Nu Holdings Ltd. (NU) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (NU) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Banks - Diversified Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NU | $12.58 | -1.01% | 61.9B | 19.67 | $0.65 | N/A |
| JPM-PL | $18.58 | -0.91% | 889.7B | 1.40 | $13.48 | +1.79% |
| JPM-PK | $18.29 | -0.73% | 889.2B | 1.37 | $13.48 | +1.79% |
| JPM-PM | $17.12 | -0.90% | 888.8B | 1.28 | $13.48 | +1.79% |
| JPM-PJ | $19.20 | -0.52% | 886.8B | 1.43 | $13.48 | +1.79% |
| JPM | $334.46 | +0.30% | 871.6B | 15.57 | $20.89 | +1.79% |
| JPM-PC | $25.24 | -0.39% | 800.8B | 1.88 | $13.48 | +1.79% |
| JPM-PD | $23.96 | -0.99% | 780.5B | 1.80 | $13.48 | +1.79% |
| BAC-PL | $1,254.00 | +0.52% | 463.2B | 355.49 | $3.51 | +1.95% |
| BAC | $57.82 | +2.87% | 407.2B | 14.24 | $4.03 | +1.95% |
Stock Comparison
NU vs JPM-PL Comparison June 2026
NU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NU stands at 61.9B. In comparison, JPM-PL has a market cap of 889.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NU is priced at $12.58, while JPM-PL trades at $18.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas JPM-PL's P/E ratio is 1.40. In terms of profitability, NU's ROE is +0.29%, compared to JPM-PL's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NU is more volatile compared to JPM-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NU.Check JPM-PL's competition here
NU vs JPM-PK Comparison June 2026
NU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NU stands at 61.9B. In comparison, JPM-PK has a market cap of 889.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NU is priced at $12.58, while JPM-PK trades at $18.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas JPM-PK's P/E ratio is 1.37. In terms of profitability, NU's ROE is +0.29%, compared to JPM-PK's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NU is more volatile compared to JPM-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NU.Check JPM-PK's competition here
NU vs JPM-PM Comparison June 2026
NU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NU stands at 61.9B. In comparison, JPM-PM has a market cap of 888.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NU is priced at $12.58, while JPM-PM trades at $17.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas JPM-PM's P/E ratio is 1.28. In terms of profitability, NU's ROE is +0.29%, compared to JPM-PM's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NU is more volatile compared to JPM-PM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NU.Check JPM-PM's competition here
NU vs JPM-PJ Comparison June 2026
NU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NU stands at 61.9B. In comparison, JPM-PJ has a market cap of 886.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NU is priced at $12.58, while JPM-PJ trades at $19.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas JPM-PJ's P/E ratio is 1.43. In terms of profitability, NU's ROE is +0.29%, compared to JPM-PJ's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NU is more volatile compared to JPM-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NU.Check JPM-PJ's competition here
NU vs JPM Comparison June 2026
NU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NU stands at 61.9B. In comparison, JPM has a market cap of 871.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NU is priced at $12.58, while JPM trades at $334.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas JPM's P/E ratio is 15.57. In terms of profitability, NU's ROE is +0.29%, compared to JPM's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NU is less volatile compared to JPM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NU.Check JPM's competition here
NU vs JPM-PC Comparison June 2026
NU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NU stands at 61.9B. In comparison, JPM-PC has a market cap of 800.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NU is priced at $12.58, while JPM-PC trades at $25.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas JPM-PC's P/E ratio is 1.88. In terms of profitability, NU's ROE is +0.29%, compared to JPM-PC's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NU is more volatile compared to JPM-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NU.Check JPM-PC's competition here
NU vs JPM-PD Comparison June 2026
NU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NU stands at 61.9B. In comparison, JPM-PD has a market cap of 780.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NU is priced at $12.58, while JPM-PD trades at $23.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas JPM-PD's P/E ratio is 1.80. In terms of profitability, NU's ROE is +0.29%, compared to JPM-PD's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NU is more volatile compared to JPM-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NU.Check JPM-PD's competition here
NU vs BAC-PL Comparison June 2026
NU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NU stands at 61.9B. In comparison, BAC-PL has a market cap of 463.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NU is priced at $12.58, while BAC-PL trades at $1,254.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas BAC-PL's P/E ratio is 355.49. In terms of profitability, NU's ROE is +0.29%, compared to BAC-PL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NU is more volatile compared to BAC-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NU.Check BAC-PL's competition here
NU vs BAC Comparison June 2026
NU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NU stands at 61.9B. In comparison, BAC has a market cap of 407.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NU is priced at $12.58, while BAC trades at $57.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas BAC's P/E ratio is 14.24. In terms of profitability, NU's ROE is +0.29%, compared to BAC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NU is more volatile compared to BAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NU.Check BAC's competition here
NU vs BAC-PN Comparison June 2026
NU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NU stands at 61.9B. In comparison, BAC-PN has a market cap of 399B. Regarding current trading prices, NU is priced at $12.58, while BAC-PN trades at $19.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas BAC-PN's P/E ratio is 5.71. In terms of profitability, NU's ROE is +0.29%, compared to BAC-PN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NU is more volatile compared to BAC-PN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NU.Check BAC-PN's competition here
NU vs BAC-PM Comparison June 2026
NU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NU stands at 61.9B. In comparison, BAC-PM has a market cap of 397.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NU is priced at $12.58, while BAC-PM trades at $21.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas BAC-PM's P/E ratio is 6.06. In terms of profitability, NU's ROE is +0.29%, compared to BAC-PM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NU is more volatile compared to BAC-PM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NU.Check BAC-PM's competition here
NU vs BAC-PS Comparison June 2026
NU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NU stands at 61.9B. In comparison, BAC-PS has a market cap of 397.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NU is priced at $12.58, while BAC-PS trades at $18.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas BAC-PS's P/E ratio is 5.40. In terms of profitability, NU's ROE is +0.29%, compared to BAC-PS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NU is more volatile compared to BAC-PS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NU.Check BAC-PS's competition here
NU vs BAC-PQ Comparison June 2026
NU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NU stands at 61.9B. In comparison, BAC-PQ has a market cap of 396.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NU is priced at $12.58, while BAC-PQ trades at $16.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas BAC-PQ's P/E ratio is 4.83. In terms of profitability, NU's ROE is +0.29%, compared to BAC-PQ's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NU is more volatile compared to BAC-PQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NU.Check BAC-PQ's competition here
NU vs BAC-PP Comparison June 2026
NU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NU stands at 61.9B. In comparison, BAC-PP has a market cap of 396.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NU is priced at $12.58, while BAC-PP trades at $16.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas BAC-PP's P/E ratio is 4.76. In terms of profitability, NU's ROE is +0.29%, compared to BAC-PP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NU is more volatile compared to BAC-PP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NU.Check BAC-PP's competition here
NU vs BAC-PO Comparison June 2026
NU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NU stands at 61.9B. In comparison, BAC-PO has a market cap of 395.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NU is priced at $12.58, while BAC-PO trades at $17.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas BAC-PO's P/E ratio is 4.96. In terms of profitability, NU's ROE is +0.29%, compared to BAC-PO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NU is more volatile compared to BAC-PO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NU.Check BAC-PO's competition here
NU vs BAC-PB Comparison June 2026
NU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NU stands at 61.9B. In comparison, BAC-PB has a market cap of 349.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NU is priced at $12.58, while BAC-PB trades at $25.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas BAC-PB's P/E ratio is 7.12. In terms of profitability, NU's ROE is +0.29%, compared to BAC-PB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NU is more volatile compared to BAC-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NU.Check BAC-PB's competition here
NU vs BAC-PK Comparison June 2026
NU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NU stands at 61.9B. In comparison, BAC-PK has a market cap of 348.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NU is priced at $12.58, while BAC-PK trades at $24.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas BAC-PK's P/E ratio is 7.01. In terms of profitability, NU's ROE is +0.29%, compared to BAC-PK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NU is more volatile compared to BAC-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NU.Check BAC-PK's competition here
NU vs HSBC Comparison June 2026
NU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NU stands at 61.9B. In comparison, HSBC has a market cap of 331.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NU is priced at $12.58, while HSBC trades at $95.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas HSBC's P/E ratio is 15.95. In terms of profitability, NU's ROE is +0.29%, compared to HSBC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NU is more volatile compared to HSBC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NU.Check HSBC's competition here
NU vs BML-PL Comparison June 2026
NU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NU stands at 61.9B. In comparison, BML-PL has a market cap of 329.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NU is priced at $12.58, while BML-PL trades at $19.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas BML-PL's P/E ratio is 5.53. In terms of profitability, NU's ROE is +0.29%, compared to BML-PL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NU is more volatile compared to BML-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NU.Check BML-PL's competition here
NU vs BML-PJ Comparison June 2026
NU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NU stands at 61.9B. In comparison, BML-PJ has a market cap of 324.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NU is priced at $12.58, while BML-PJ trades at $19.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas BML-PJ's P/E ratio is 5.68. In terms of profitability, NU's ROE is +0.29%, compared to BML-PJ's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NU is more volatile compared to BML-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NU.Check BML-PJ's competition here
NU vs BML-PH Comparison June 2026
NU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NU stands at 61.9B. In comparison, BML-PH has a market cap of 322.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NU is priced at $12.58, while BML-PH trades at $19.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas BML-PH's P/E ratio is 5.45. In terms of profitability, NU's ROE is +0.29%, compared to BML-PH's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NU is more volatile compared to BML-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NU.Check BML-PH's competition here
NU vs BML-PG Comparison June 2026
NU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NU stands at 61.9B. In comparison, BML-PG has a market cap of 315.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NU is priced at $12.58, while BML-PG trades at $18.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas BML-PG's P/E ratio is 5.37. In terms of profitability, NU's ROE is +0.29%, compared to BML-PG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NU is more volatile compared to BML-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NU.Check BML-PG's competition here
NU vs BAC-PE Comparison June 2026
NU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NU stands at 61.9B. In comparison, BAC-PE has a market cap of 310.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NU is priced at $12.58, while BAC-PE trades at $18.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas BAC-PE's P/E ratio is 5.34. In terms of profitability, NU's ROE is +0.29%, compared to BAC-PE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NU is more volatile compared to BAC-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NU.Check BAC-PE's competition here
NU vs RY Comparison June 2026
NU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NU stands at 61.9B. In comparison, RY has a market cap of 283.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NU is priced at $12.58, while RY trades at $202.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas RY's P/E ratio is 18.44. In terms of profitability, NU's ROE is +0.29%, compared to RY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NU is more volatile compared to RY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NU.Check RY's competition here
NU vs WFC Comparison June 2026
NU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NU stands at 61.9B. In comparison, WFC has a market cap of 256.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NU is priced at $12.58, while WFC trades at $83.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas WFC's P/E ratio is 12.96. In terms of profitability, NU's ROE is +0.29%, compared to WFC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NU is more volatile compared to WFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NU.Check WFC's competition here
NU vs WFC-PA Comparison June 2026
NU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NU stands at 61.9B. In comparison, WFC-PA has a market cap of 249.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NU is priced at $12.58, while WFC-PA trades at $18.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas WFC-PA's P/E ratio is 3.80. In terms of profitability, NU's ROE is +0.29%, compared to WFC-PA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NU is more volatile compared to WFC-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NU.Check WFC-PA's competition here
NU vs WFC-PD Comparison June 2026
NU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NU stands at 61.9B. In comparison, WFC-PD has a market cap of 248.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NU is priced at $12.58, while WFC-PD trades at $16.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas WFC-PD's P/E ratio is 3.45. In terms of profitability, NU's ROE is +0.29%, compared to WFC-PD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NU is more volatile compared to WFC-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NU.Check WFC-PD's competition here
NU vs WFC-PC Comparison June 2026
NU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NU stands at 61.9B. In comparison, WFC-PC has a market cap of 248.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NU is priced at $12.58, while WFC-PC trades at $16.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas WFC-PC's P/E ratio is 59.00. In terms of profitability, NU's ROE is +0.29%, compared to WFC-PC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NU is more volatile compared to WFC-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NU.Check WFC-PC's competition here
NU vs C Comparison June 2026
NU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NU stands at 61.9B. In comparison, C has a market cap of 248.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NU is priced at $12.58, while C trades at $145.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas C's P/E ratio is 18.04. In terms of profitability, NU's ROE is +0.29%, compared to C's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NU is more volatile compared to C. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NU.Check C's competition here
NU vs WFC-PL Comparison June 2026
NU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NU stands at 61.9B. In comparison, WFC-PL has a market cap of 239B. Regarding current trading prices, NU is priced at $12.58, while WFC-PL trades at $1,168.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas WFC-PL's P/E ratio is 242.13. In terms of profitability, NU's ROE is +0.29%, compared to WFC-PL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NU is more volatile compared to WFC-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NU.Check WFC-PL's competition here
NU vs MUFG Comparison June 2026
NU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NU stands at 61.9B. In comparison, MUFG has a market cap of 235.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NU is priced at $12.58, while MUFG trades at $20.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas MUFG's P/E ratio is 15.82. In terms of profitability, NU's ROE is +0.29%, compared to MUFG's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NU is more volatile compared to MUFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NU.Check MUFG's competition here
NU vs TD Comparison June 2026
NU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NU stands at 61.9B. In comparison, TD has a market cap of 202.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NU is priced at $12.58, while TD trades at $119.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas TD's P/E ratio is 19.68. In terms of profitability, NU's ROE is +0.29%, compared to TD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NU is more volatile compared to TD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NU.Check TD's competition here
NU vs SAN Comparison June 2026
NU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NU stands at 61.9B. In comparison, SAN has a market cap of 201.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NU is priced at $12.58, while SAN trades at $13.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas SAN's P/E ratio is 13.34. In terms of profitability, NU's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SAN's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NU is more volatile compared to SAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NU.Check SAN's competition here
NU vs WFC-PQ Comparison June 2026
NU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NU stands at 61.9B. In comparison, WFC-PQ has a market cap of 200.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NU is priced at $12.58, while WFC-PQ trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas WFC-PQ's P/E ratio is 5.17. In terms of profitability, NU's ROE is +0.29%, compared to WFC-PQ's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NU is more volatile compared to WFC-PQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NU.Check WFC-PQ's competition here
NU vs WFC-PY Comparison June 2026
NU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NU stands at 61.9B. In comparison, WFC-PY has a market cap of 186.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NU is priced at $12.58, while WFC-PY trades at $22.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas WFC-PY's P/E ratio is 4.72. In terms of profitability, NU's ROE is +0.29%, compared to WFC-PY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NU is more volatile compared to WFC-PY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NU.Check WFC-PY's competition here
NU vs WFC-PR Comparison June 2026
NU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NU stands at 61.9B. In comparison, WFC-PR has a market cap of 184.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NU is priced at $12.58, while WFC-PR trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas WFC-PR's P/E ratio is 5.17. In terms of profitability, NU's ROE is +0.29%, compared to WFC-PR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NU is more volatile compared to WFC-PR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NU.Check WFC-PR's competition here
NU vs UBS Comparison June 2026
NU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NU stands at 61.9B. In comparison, UBS has a market cap of 167.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NU is priced at $12.58, while UBS trades at $50.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas UBS's P/E ratio is 18.33. In terms of profitability, NU's ROE is +0.29%, compared to UBS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NU is more volatile compared to UBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NU.Check UBS's competition here
NU vs BBVA Comparison June 2026
NU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NU stands at 61.9B. In comparison, BBVA has a market cap of 138.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NU is priced at $12.58, while BBVA trades at $24.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas BBVA's P/E ratio is 11.78. In terms of profitability, NU's ROE is +0.29%, compared to BBVA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NU is more volatile compared to BBVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NU.Check BBVA's competition here
NU vs C-PJ Comparison June 2026
NU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NU stands at 61.9B. In comparison, C-PJ has a market cap of 122.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NU is priced at $12.58, while C-PJ trades at $25.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas C-PJ's P/E ratio is 2.95. In terms of profitability, NU's ROE is +0.29%, compared to C-PJ's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NU is more volatile compared to C-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NU.Check C-PJ's competition here
NU vs BMO Comparison June 2026
NU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NU stands at 61.9B. In comparison, BMO has a market cap of 121.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NU is priced at $12.58, while BMO trades at $173.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas BMO's P/E ratio is 18.61. In terms of profitability, NU's ROE is +0.29%, compared to BMO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NU is more volatile compared to BMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NU.Check BMO's competition here
NU vs BNS Comparison June 2026
NU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NU stands at 61.9B. In comparison, BNS has a market cap of 106.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NU is priced at $12.58, while BNS trades at $86.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas BNS's P/E ratio is 16.78. In terms of profitability, NU's ROE is +0.29%, compared to BNS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NU is more volatile compared to BNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NU.Check BNS's competition here
NU vs CM Comparison June 2026
NU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NU stands at 61.9B. In comparison, CM has a market cap of 105.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NU is priced at $12.58, while CM trades at $114.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas CM's P/E ratio is 15.84. In terms of profitability, NU's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CM's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NU is less volatile compared to CM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NU.Check CM's competition here
NU vs RY-PT Comparison June 2026
NU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NU stands at 61.9B. In comparison, RY-PT has a market cap of 98.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NU is priced at $12.58, while RY-PT trades at $25.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas RY-PT's P/E ratio is 2.84. In terms of profitability, NU's ROE is +0.29%, compared to RY-PT's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NU is more volatile compared to RY-PT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NU.Check RY-PT's competition here
NU vs SMFG Comparison June 2026
NU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NU stands at 61.9B. In comparison, SMFG has a market cap of 97B. Regarding current trading prices, NU is priced at $12.58, while SMFG trades at $24.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas SMFG's P/E ratio is 16.25. In terms of profitability, NU's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SMFG's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NU is more volatile compared to SMFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NU.Check SMFG's competition here
NU vs BCS Comparison June 2026
NU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NU stands at 61.9B. In comparison, BCS has a market cap of 92.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NU is priced at $12.58, while BCS trades at $27.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas BCS's P/E ratio is 11.71. In terms of profitability, NU's ROE is +0.29%, compared to BCS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NU is more volatile compared to BCS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NU.Check BCS's competition here
NU vs USB-PQ Comparison June 2026
NU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NU stands at 61.9B. In comparison, USB-PQ has a market cap of 91.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NU is priced at $12.58, while USB-PQ trades at $14.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas USB-PQ's P/E ratio is 3.19. In terms of profitability, NU's ROE is +0.29%, compared to USB-PQ's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NU is more volatile compared to USB-PQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NU.Check USB-PQ's competition here
NU vs USB Comparison June 2026
NU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NU stands at 61.9B. In comparison, USB has a market cap of 91.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NU is priced at $12.58, while USB trades at $59.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas USB's P/E ratio is 12.30. In terms of profitability, NU's ROE is +0.29%, compared to USB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NU is less volatile compared to USB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NU.Check USB's competition here
NU vs USB-PR Comparison June 2026
NU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NU stands at 61.9B. In comparison, USB-PR has a market cap of 91B. Regarding current trading prices, NU is priced at $12.58, while USB-PR trades at $15.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas USB-PR's P/E ratio is 3.35. In terms of profitability, NU's ROE is +0.29%, compared to USB-PR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NU is more volatile compared to USB-PR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NU.Check USB-PR's competition here
NU vs ING Comparison June 2026
NU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NU stands at 61.9B. In comparison, ING has a market cap of 90.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NU is priced at $12.58, while ING trades at $31.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas ING's P/E ratio is 12.35. In terms of profitability, NU's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ING's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NU is more volatile compared to ING. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NU.Check ING's competition here
NU vs USB-PP Comparison June 2026
NU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NU stands at 61.9B. In comparison, USB-PP has a market cap of 67.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NU is priced at $12.58, while USB-PP trades at $21.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas USB-PP's P/E ratio is 4.66. In terms of profitability, NU's ROE is +0.29%, compared to USB-PP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NU is more volatile compared to USB-PP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NU.Check USB-PP's competition here
NU vs USB-PH Comparison June 2026
NU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NU stands at 61.9B. In comparison, USB-PH has a market cap of 67.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NU is priced at $12.58, while USB-PH trades at $18.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas USB-PH's P/E ratio is 4.04. In terms of profitability, NU's ROE is +0.29%, compared to USB-PH's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NU is more volatile compared to USB-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NU.Check USB-PH's competition here
NU vs WFC-PZ Comparison June 2026
NU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NU stands at 61.9B. In comparison, WFC-PZ has a market cap of 58.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NU is priced at $12.58, while WFC-PZ trades at $18.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas WFC-PZ's P/E ratio is 3.83. In terms of profitability, NU's ROE is +0.29%, compared to WFC-PZ's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NU is more volatile compared to WFC-PZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NU.Check WFC-PZ's competition here
NU vs C-PK Comparison June 2026
NU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NU stands at 61.9B. In comparison, C-PK has a market cap of 48.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NU is priced at $12.58, while C-PK trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas C-PK's P/E ratio is 2.94. In terms of profitability, NU's ROE is +0.29%, compared to C-PK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NU is more volatile compared to C-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NU.Check C-PK's competition here
NU vs NWG Comparison June 2026
NU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NU stands at 61.9B. In comparison, NWG has a market cap of 34.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NU is priced at $12.58, while NWG trades at $17.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas NWG's P/E ratio is 9.36. In terms of profitability, NU's ROE is +0.29%, compared to NWG's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NU is more volatile compared to NWG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NU.Check NWG's competition here
NU vs NTRS Comparison June 2026
NU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NU stands at 61.9B. In comparison, NTRS has a market cap of 32.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NU is priced at $12.58, while NTRS trades at $177.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas NTRS's P/E ratio is 18.38. In terms of profitability, NU's ROE is +0.29%, compared to NTRS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NU is more volatile compared to NTRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NU.Check NTRS's competition here
NU vs NTRSO Comparison June 2026
NU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NU stands at 61.9B. In comparison, NTRSO has a market cap of 32.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NU is priced at $12.58, while NTRSO trades at $18.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas NTRSO's P/E ratio is 2.55. In terms of profitability, NU's ROE is +0.29%, compared to NTRSO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NU is more volatile compared to NTRSO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NU.Check NTRSO's competition here
NU vs BAP Comparison June 2026
NU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NU stands at 61.9B. In comparison, BAP has a market cap of 30.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NU is priced at $12.58, while BAP trades at $373.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas BAP's P/E ratio is 14.61. In terms of profitability, NU's ROE is +0.29%, compared to BAP's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NU is more volatile compared to BAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NU.Check BAP's competition here
NU vs EWBC Comparison June 2026
NU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NU stands at 61.9B. In comparison, EWBC has a market cap of 17.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NU is priced at $12.58, while EWBC trades at $130.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas EWBC's P/E ratio is 12.90. In terms of profitability, NU's ROE is +0.29%, compared to EWBC's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NU is more volatile compared to EWBC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NU.Check EWBC's competition here
NU vs CS Comparison June 2026
NU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NU stands at 61.9B. In comparison, CS has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NU is priced at $12.58, while CS trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas CS's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, NU's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CS's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NU is more volatile compared to CS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NU.Check CS's competition here
NU vs NTB Comparison June 2026
NU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NU stands at 61.9B. In comparison, NTB has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NU is priced at $12.58, while NTB trades at $59.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas NTB's P/E ratio is 10.18. In terms of profitability, NU's ROE is +0.29%, compared to NTB's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NU is more volatile compared to NTB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NU.Check NTB's competition here
NU vs TANNL Comparison June 2026
NU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NU stands at 61.9B. In comparison, TANNL has a market cap of 989.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NU is priced at $12.58, while TANNL trades at $25.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas TANNL's P/E ratio is 34.88. In terms of profitability, NU's ROE is +0.29%, compared to TANNL's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NU is more volatile compared to TANNL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NU.Check TANNL's competition here
NU vs FRBT Comparison June 2026
NU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NU stands at 61.9B. In comparison, FRBT has a market cap of 916.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NU is priced at $12.58, while FRBT trades at $17.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas FRBT's P/E ratio is 10.12. In terms of profitability, NU's ROE is +0.29%, compared to FRBT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NU is more volatile compared to FRBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NU.Check FRBT's competition here
NU vs FRC-PL Comparison June 2026
NU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NU stands at 61.9B. In comparison, FRC-PL has a market cap of 312.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NU is priced at $12.58, while FRC-PL trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas FRC-PL's P/E ratio is 0.22. In terms of profitability, NU's ROE is +0.29%, compared to FRC-PL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NU is less volatile compared to FRC-PL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NU.Check FRC-PL's competition here
NU vs WBK Comparison June 2026
NU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NU stands at 61.9B. In comparison, WBK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NU is priced at $12.58, while WBK trades at $14.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas WBK's P/E ratio is 14.31. In terms of profitability, NU's ROE is +0.29%, compared to WBK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NU is more volatile compared to WBK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NU.Check WBK's competition here