U.S. Bancorp (USB-PH) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (USB-PH) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Banks - Diversified Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| USB-PH | $18.59 | +0.16% | 66.6B | 3.81 | $4.88 | +3.34% |
| JPM | $342.89 | +2.50% | 919.1B | 14.70 | $23.34 | +1.79% |
| JPM-PK | $18.30 | -0.05% | 916B | 0.78 | $23.42 | +1.79% |
| JPM-PL | $18.62 | -0.37% | 915.7B | 0.80 | $23.42 | +1.79% |
| JPM-PM | $17.11 | +0.47% | 913.4B | 0.73 | $23.42 | +1.79% |
| JPM-PJ | $19.23 | +0.37% | 912.9B | 0.82 | $23.42 | +1.79% |
| JPM-PC | $25.28 | +0.08% | 798.9B | 1.08 | $23.42 | +1.79% |
| JPM-PD | $24.06 | +0.38% | 772.8B | 1.03 | $23.42 | +1.79% |
| BAC-PL | $1,275.00 | +0.82% | 471.7B | 291.74 | $4.36 | +1.88% |
| BAC | $60.62 | +1.88% | 430.3B | 13.91 | $4.36 | +1.88% |
Stock Comparison
USB-PH vs JPM Comparison July 2026
USB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PH stands at 66.6B. In comparison, JPM has a market cap of 919.1B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PH is priced at $18.59, while JPM trades at $342.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.81, whereas JPM's P/E ratio is 14.70. In terms of profitability, USB-PH's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JPM's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PH is less volatile compared to JPM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PH.Check JPM's competition here
USB-PH vs JPM-PK Comparison July 2026
USB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PH stands at 66.6B. In comparison, JPM-PK has a market cap of 916B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PH is priced at $18.59, while JPM-PK trades at $18.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.81, whereas JPM-PK's P/E ratio is 0.78. In terms of profitability, USB-PH's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JPM-PK's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PH is more volatile compared to JPM-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PH.Check JPM-PK's competition here
USB-PH vs JPM-PL Comparison July 2026
USB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PH stands at 66.6B. In comparison, JPM-PL has a market cap of 915.7B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PH is priced at $18.59, while JPM-PL trades at $18.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.81, whereas JPM-PL's P/E ratio is 0.80. In terms of profitability, USB-PH's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JPM-PL's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PH is more volatile compared to JPM-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PH.Check JPM-PL's competition here
USB-PH vs JPM-PM Comparison July 2026
USB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PH stands at 66.6B. In comparison, JPM-PM has a market cap of 913.4B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PH is priced at $18.59, while JPM-PM trades at $17.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.81, whereas JPM-PM's P/E ratio is 0.73. In terms of profitability, USB-PH's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JPM-PM's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PH is more volatile compared to JPM-PM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PH.Check JPM-PM's competition here
USB-PH vs JPM-PJ Comparison July 2026
USB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PH stands at 66.6B. In comparison, JPM-PJ has a market cap of 912.9B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PH is priced at $18.59, while JPM-PJ trades at $19.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.81, whereas JPM-PJ's P/E ratio is 0.82. In terms of profitability, USB-PH's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JPM-PJ's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PH is more volatile compared to JPM-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PH.Check JPM-PJ's competition here
USB-PH vs JPM-PC Comparison July 2026
USB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PH stands at 66.6B. In comparison, JPM-PC has a market cap of 798.9B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PH is priced at $18.59, while JPM-PC trades at $25.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.81, whereas JPM-PC's P/E ratio is 1.08. In terms of profitability, USB-PH's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JPM-PC's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PH is more volatile compared to JPM-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PH.Check JPM-PC's competition here
USB-PH vs JPM-PD Comparison July 2026
USB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PH stands at 66.6B. In comparison, JPM-PD has a market cap of 772.8B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PH is priced at $18.59, while JPM-PD trades at $24.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.81, whereas JPM-PD's P/E ratio is 1.03. In terms of profitability, USB-PH's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JPM-PD's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PH is more volatile compared to JPM-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PH.Check JPM-PD's competition here
USB-PH vs BAC-PL Comparison July 2026
USB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PH stands at 66.6B. In comparison, BAC-PL has a market cap of 471.7B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PH is priced at $18.59, while BAC-PL trades at $1,275.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.81, whereas BAC-PL's P/E ratio is 291.74. In terms of profitability, USB-PH's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BAC-PL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PH is more volatile compared to BAC-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PH.Check BAC-PL's competition here
USB-PH vs BAC Comparison July 2026
USB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PH stands at 66.6B. In comparison, BAC has a market cap of 430.3B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PH is priced at $18.59, while BAC trades at $60.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.81, whereas BAC's P/E ratio is 13.91. In terms of profitability, USB-PH's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BAC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PH is less volatile compared to BAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PH.Check BAC's competition here
USB-PH vs BAC-PQ Comparison July 2026
USB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PH stands at 66.6B. In comparison, BAC-PQ has a market cap of 430B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PH is priced at $18.59, while BAC-PQ trades at $16.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.81, whereas BAC-PQ's P/E ratio is 3.85. In terms of profitability, USB-PH's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BAC-PQ's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PH is more volatile compared to BAC-PQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PH.Check BAC-PQ's competition here
USB-PH vs BAC-PS Comparison July 2026
USB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PH stands at 66.6B. In comparison, BAC-PS has a market cap of 429.9B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PH is priced at $18.59, while BAC-PS trades at $18.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.81, whereas BAC-PS's P/E ratio is 4.30. In terms of profitability, USB-PH's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BAC-PS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PH is more volatile compared to BAC-PS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PH.Check BAC-PS's competition here
USB-PH vs BAC-PO Comparison July 2026
USB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PH stands at 66.6B. In comparison, BAC-PO has a market cap of 429.7B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PH is priced at $18.59, while BAC-PO trades at $17.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.81, whereas BAC-PO's P/E ratio is 3.97. In terms of profitability, USB-PH's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BAC-PO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PH is more volatile compared to BAC-PO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PH.Check BAC-PO's competition here
USB-PH vs BAC-PP Comparison July 2026
USB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PH stands at 66.6B. In comparison, BAC-PP has a market cap of 429.6B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PH is priced at $18.59, while BAC-PP trades at $16.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.81, whereas BAC-PP's P/E ratio is 3.78. In terms of profitability, USB-PH's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BAC-PP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PH is more volatile compared to BAC-PP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PH.Check BAC-PP's competition here
USB-PH vs BAC-PM Comparison July 2026
USB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PH stands at 66.6B. In comparison, BAC-PM has a market cap of 429.5B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PH is priced at $18.59, while BAC-PM trades at $21.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.81, whereas BAC-PM's P/E ratio is 4.84. In terms of profitability, USB-PH's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BAC-PM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PH is more volatile compared to BAC-PM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PH.Check BAC-PM's competition here
USB-PH vs BAC-PN Comparison July 2026
USB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PH stands at 66.6B. In comparison, BAC-PN has a market cap of 429.2B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PH is priced at $18.59, while BAC-PN trades at $19.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.81, whereas BAC-PN's P/E ratio is 4.49. In terms of profitability, USB-PH's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BAC-PN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PH is more volatile compared to BAC-PN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PH.Check BAC-PN's competition here
USB-PH vs BAC-PB Comparison July 2026
USB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PH stands at 66.6B. In comparison, BAC-PB has a market cap of 348.8B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PH is priced at $18.59, while BAC-PB trades at $24.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.81, whereas BAC-PB's P/E ratio is 5.67. In terms of profitability, USB-PH's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BAC-PB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PH is more volatile compared to BAC-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PH.Check BAC-PB's competition here
USB-PH vs BAC-PK Comparison July 2026
USB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PH stands at 66.6B. In comparison, BAC-PK has a market cap of 343.5B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PH is priced at $18.59, while BAC-PK trades at $24.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.81, whereas BAC-PK's P/E ratio is 5.52. In terms of profitability, USB-PH's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BAC-PK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PH is more volatile compared to BAC-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PH.Check BAC-PK's competition here
USB-PH vs HSBC Comparison July 2026
USB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PH stands at 66.6B. In comparison, HSBC has a market cap of 341.1B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PH is priced at $18.59, while HSBC trades at $99.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.81, whereas HSBC's P/E ratio is 12.72. In terms of profitability, USB-PH's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HSBC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PH is less volatile compared to HSBC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PH.Check HSBC's competition here
USB-PH vs BML-PL Comparison July 2026
USB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PH stands at 66.6B. In comparison, BML-PL has a market cap of 327B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PH is priced at $18.59, while BML-PL trades at $19.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.81, whereas BML-PL's P/E ratio is 4.39. In terms of profitability, USB-PH's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BML-PL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PH is more volatile compared to BML-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PH.Check BML-PL's competition here
USB-PH vs BML-PJ Comparison July 2026
USB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PH stands at 66.6B. In comparison, BML-PJ has a market cap of 323.9B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PH is priced at $18.59, while BML-PJ trades at $19.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.81, whereas BML-PJ's P/E ratio is 4.52. In terms of profitability, USB-PH's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BML-PJ's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PH is less volatile compared to BML-PJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PH.Check BML-PJ's competition here
USB-PH vs BML-PG Comparison July 2026
USB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PH stands at 66.6B. In comparison, BML-PG has a market cap of 317.3B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PH is priced at $18.59, while BML-PG trades at $18.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.81, whereas BML-PG's P/E ratio is 4.31. In terms of profitability, USB-PH's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BML-PG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PH is more volatile compared to BML-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PH.Check BML-PG's competition here
USB-PH vs BML-PH Comparison July 2026
USB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PH stands at 66.6B. In comparison, BML-PH has a market cap of 314.2B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PH is priced at $18.59, while BML-PH trades at $18.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.81, whereas BML-PH's P/E ratio is 4.25. In terms of profitability, USB-PH's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BML-PH's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PH is more volatile compared to BML-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PH.Check BML-PH's competition here
USB-PH vs BAC-PE Comparison July 2026
USB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PH stands at 66.6B. In comparison, BAC-PE has a market cap of 308.4B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PH is priced at $18.59, while BAC-PE trades at $18.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.81, whereas BAC-PE's P/E ratio is 4.23. In terms of profitability, USB-PH's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BAC-PE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PH is more volatile compared to BAC-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PH.Check BAC-PE's competition here
USB-PH vs RY Comparison July 2026
USB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PH stands at 66.6B. In comparison, RY has a market cap of 297.5B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PH is priced at $18.59, while RY trades at $214.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.81, whereas RY's P/E ratio is 18.89. In terms of profitability, USB-PH's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PH is less volatile compared to RY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PH.Check RY's competition here
USB-PH vs WFC Comparison July 2026
USB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PH stands at 66.6B. In comparison, WFC has a market cap of 261.7B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PH is priced at $18.59, while WFC trades at $85.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.81, whereas WFC's P/E ratio is 12.38. In terms of profitability, USB-PH's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WFC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PH is less volatile compared to WFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PH.Check WFC's competition here
USB-PH vs WFC-PZ Comparison July 2026
USB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PH stands at 66.6B. In comparison, WFC-PZ has a market cap of 260.7B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PH is priced at $18.59, while WFC-PZ trades at $18.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.81, whereas WFC-PZ's P/E ratio is 2.64. In terms of profitability, USB-PH's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WFC-PZ's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PH is more volatile compared to WFC-PZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PH.Check WFC-PZ's competition here
USB-PH vs WFC-PD Comparison July 2026
USB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PH stands at 66.6B. In comparison, WFC-PD has a market cap of 260.4B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PH is priced at $18.59, while WFC-PD trades at $16.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.81, whereas WFC-PD's P/E ratio is 2.38. In terms of profitability, USB-PH's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WFC-PD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PH is more volatile compared to WFC-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PH.Check WFC-PD's competition here
USB-PH vs WFC-PA Comparison July 2026
USB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PH stands at 66.6B. In comparison, WFC-PA has a market cap of 260B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PH is priced at $18.59, while WFC-PA trades at $18.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.81, whereas WFC-PA's P/E ratio is 2.61. In terms of profitability, USB-PH's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WFC-PA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PH is more volatile compared to WFC-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PH.Check WFC-PA's competition here
USB-PH vs WFC-PC Comparison July 2026
USB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PH stands at 66.6B. In comparison, WFC-PC has a market cap of 259.7B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PH is priced at $18.59, while WFC-PC trades at $16.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.81, whereas WFC-PC's P/E ratio is 2.44. In terms of profitability, USB-PH's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WFC-PC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PH is more volatile compared to WFC-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PH.Check WFC-PC's competition here
USB-PH vs MUFG Comparison July 2026
USB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PH stands at 66.6B. In comparison, MUFG has a market cap of 253.9B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PH is priced at $18.59, while MUFG trades at $22.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.81, whereas MUFG's P/E ratio is 16.07. In terms of profitability, USB-PH's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MUFG's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PH is less volatile compared to MUFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PH.Check MUFG's competition here
USB-PH vs WFC-PL Comparison July 2026
USB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PH stands at 66.6B. In comparison, WFC-PL has a market cap of 240.2B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PH is priced at $18.59, while WFC-PL trades at $1,176.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.81, whereas WFC-PL's P/E ratio is 169.14. In terms of profitability, USB-PH's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WFC-PL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PH is more volatile compared to WFC-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PH.Check WFC-PL's competition here
USB-PH vs C Comparison July 2026
USB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PH stands at 66.6B. In comparison, C has a market cap of 228.6B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PH is priced at $18.59, while C trades at $133.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.81, whereas C's P/E ratio is 14.40. In terms of profitability, USB-PH's ROE is +0.12%, compared to C's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PH is less volatile compared to C. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PH.Check C's competition here
USB-PH vs TD Comparison July 2026
USB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PH stands at 66.6B. In comparison, TD has a market cap of 207.6B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PH is priced at $18.59, while TD trades at $122.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.81, whereas TD's P/E ratio is 17.60. In terms of profitability, USB-PH's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PH is less volatile compared to TD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PH.Check TD's competition here
USB-PH vs WFC-PQ Comparison July 2026
USB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PH stands at 66.6B. In comparison, WFC-PQ has a market cap of 200.9B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PH is priced at $18.59, while WFC-PQ trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.81, whereas WFC-PQ's P/E ratio is 5.17. In terms of profitability, USB-PH's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WFC-PQ's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PH is more volatile compared to WFC-PQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PH.Check WFC-PQ's competition here
USB-PH vs SAN Comparison July 2026
USB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PH stands at 66.6B. In comparison, SAN has a market cap of 200.2B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PH is priced at $18.59, while SAN trades at $13.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.81, whereas SAN's P/E ratio is 12.24. In terms of profitability, USB-PH's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SAN's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PH is less volatile compared to SAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PH.Check SAN's competition here
USB-PH vs MER-PK Comparison July 2026
USB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PH stands at 66.6B. In comparison, MER-PK has a market cap of 192.6B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PH is priced at $18.59, while MER-PK trades at $25.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.81, whereas MER-PK's P/E ratio is 6.26. In terms of profitability, USB-PH's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MER-PK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PH is more volatile compared to MER-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PH.Check MER-PK's competition here
USB-PH vs WFC-PR Comparison July 2026
USB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PH stands at 66.6B. In comparison, WFC-PR has a market cap of 184.2B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PH is priced at $18.59, while WFC-PR trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.81, whereas WFC-PR's P/E ratio is 5.17. In terms of profitability, USB-PH's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WFC-PR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PH is more volatile compared to WFC-PR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PH.Check WFC-PR's competition here
USB-PH vs WFC-PY Comparison July 2026
USB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PH stands at 66.6B. In comparison, WFC-PY has a market cap of 183.1B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PH is priced at $18.59, while WFC-PY trades at $22.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.81, whereas WFC-PY's P/E ratio is 3.22. In terms of profitability, USB-PH's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WFC-PY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PH is more volatile compared to WFC-PY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PH.Check WFC-PY's competition here
USB-PH vs UBS Comparison July 2026
USB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PH stands at 66.6B. In comparison, UBS has a market cap of 176.4B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PH is priced at $18.59, while UBS trades at $53.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.81, whereas UBS's P/E ratio is 19.29. In terms of profitability, USB-PH's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UBS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PH is less volatile compared to UBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PH.Check UBS's competition here
USB-PH vs BBVA Comparison July 2026
USB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PH stands at 66.6B. In comparison, BBVA has a market cap of 142.3B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PH is priced at $18.59, while BBVA trades at $25.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.81, whereas BBVA's P/E ratio is 12.17. In terms of profitability, USB-PH's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BBVA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PH is less volatile compared to BBVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PH.Check BBVA's competition here
USB-PH vs BMO Comparison July 2026
USB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PH stands at 66.6B. In comparison, BMO has a market cap of 126.7B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PH is priced at $18.59, while BMO trades at $180.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.81, whereas BMO's P/E ratio is 18.30. In terms of profitability, USB-PH's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BMO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PH is less volatile compared to BMO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PH.Check BMO's competition here
USB-PH vs C-PJ Comparison July 2026
USB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PH stands at 66.6B. In comparison, C-PJ has a market cap of 122.2B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PH is priced at $18.59, while C-PJ trades at $25.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.81, whereas C-PJ's P/E ratio is 2.95. In terms of profitability, USB-PH's ROE is +0.12%, compared to C-PJ's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PH is more volatile compared to C-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PH.Check C-PJ's competition here
USB-PH vs CM Comparison July 2026
USB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PH stands at 66.6B. In comparison, CM has a market cap of 109.9B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PH is priced at $18.59, while CM trades at $118.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.81, whereas CM's P/E ratio is 16.96. In terms of profitability, USB-PH's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CM's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PH is less volatile compared to CM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PH.Check CM's competition here
USB-PH vs BNS Comparison July 2026
USB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PH stands at 66.6B. In comparison, BNS has a market cap of 109.1B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PH is priced at $18.59, while BNS trades at $88.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.81, whereas BNS's P/E ratio is 15.59. In terms of profitability, USB-PH's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BNS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PH is less volatile compared to BNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PH.Check BNS's competition here
USB-PH vs SMFG Comparison July 2026
USB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PH stands at 66.6B. In comparison, SMFG has a market cap of 101.7B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PH is priced at $18.59, while SMFG trades at $26.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.81, whereas SMFG's P/E ratio is 18.88. In terms of profitability, USB-PH's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SMFG's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PH is less volatile compared to SMFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PH.Check SMFG's competition here
USB-PH vs RY-PT Comparison July 2026
USB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PH stands at 66.6B. In comparison, RY-PT has a market cap of 98.8B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PH is priced at $18.59, while RY-PT trades at $25.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.81, whereas RY-PT's P/E ratio is 2.84. In terms of profitability, USB-PH's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RY-PT's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PH is more volatile compared to RY-PT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PH.Check RY-PT's competition here
USB-PH vs USB-PQ Comparison July 2026
USB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PH stands at 66.6B. In comparison, USB-PQ has a market cap of 97.1B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PH is priced at $18.59, while USB-PQ trades at $14.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.81, whereas USB-PQ's P/E ratio is 2.98. In terms of profitability, USB-PH's ROE is +0.12%, compared to USB-PQ's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PH is more volatile compared to USB-PQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PH.Check USB-PQ's competition here
USB-PH vs USB-PR Comparison July 2026
USB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PH stands at 66.6B. In comparison, USB-PR has a market cap of 97B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PH is priced at $18.59, while USB-PR trades at $15.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.81, whereas USB-PR's P/E ratio is 3.13. In terms of profitability, USB-PH's ROE is +0.12%, compared to USB-PR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PH is more volatile compared to USB-PR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PH.Check USB-PR's competition here
USB-PH vs USB Comparison July 2026
USB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PH stands at 66.6B. In comparison, USB has a market cap of 96.8B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PH is priced at $18.59, while USB trades at $62.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.81, whereas USB's P/E ratio is 13.03. In terms of profitability, USB-PH's ROE is +0.12%, compared to USB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PH is less volatile compared to USB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PH.Check USB's competition here
USB-PH vs ING Comparison July 2026
USB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PH stands at 66.6B. In comparison, ING has a market cap of 94.2B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PH is priced at $18.59, while ING trades at $32.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.81, whereas ING's P/E ratio is 12.94. In terms of profitability, USB-PH's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ING's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PH is less volatile compared to ING. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PH.Check ING's competition here
USB-PH vs BCS Comparison July 2026
USB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PH stands at 66.6B. In comparison, BCS has a market cap of 92.8B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PH is priced at $18.59, while BCS trades at $27.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.81, whereas BCS's P/E ratio is 11.47. In terms of profitability, USB-PH's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BCS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PH is less volatile compared to BCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PH.Check BCS's competition here
USB-PH vs USB-PP Comparison July 2026
USB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PH stands at 66.6B. In comparison, USB-PP has a market cap of 67.1B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PH is priced at $18.59, while USB-PP trades at $21.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.81, whereas USB-PP's P/E ratio is 4.38. In terms of profitability, USB-PH's ROE is +0.12%, compared to USB-PP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PH is more volatile compared to USB-PP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PH.Check USB-PP's competition here
USB-PH vs C-PK Comparison July 2026
USB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PH stands at 66.6B. In comparison, C-PK has a market cap of 48.1B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PH is priced at $18.59, while C-PK trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.81, whereas C-PK's P/E ratio is 2.94. In terms of profitability, USB-PH's ROE is +0.12%, compared to C-PK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PH is more volatile compared to C-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PH.Check C-PK's competition here
USB-PH vs NTRS Comparison July 2026
USB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PH stands at 66.6B. In comparison, NTRS has a market cap of 34.5B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PH is priced at $18.59, while NTRS trades at $186.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.81, whereas NTRS's P/E ratio is 19.01. In terms of profitability, USB-PH's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NTRS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PH is less volatile compared to NTRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PH.Check NTRS's competition here
USB-PH vs NWG Comparison July 2026
USB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PH stands at 66.6B. In comparison, NWG has a market cap of 34.3B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PH is priced at $18.59, while NWG trades at $17.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.81, whereas NWG's P/E ratio is 9.16. In terms of profitability, USB-PH's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NWG's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PH is less volatile compared to NWG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PH.Check NWG's competition here
USB-PH vs NTRSO Comparison July 2026
USB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PH stands at 66.6B. In comparison, NTRSO has a market cap of 33.8B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PH is priced at $18.59, while NTRSO trades at $18.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.81, whereas NTRSO's P/E ratio is 1.87. In terms of profitability, USB-PH's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NTRSO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PH is more volatile compared to NTRSO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PH.Check NTRSO's competition here
USB-PH vs EWBC Comparison July 2026
USB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PH stands at 66.6B. In comparison, EWBC has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PH is priced at $18.59, while EWBC trades at $131.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.81, whereas EWBC's P/E ratio is 13.13. In terms of profitability, USB-PH's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EWBC's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PH is less volatile compared to EWBC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PH.Check EWBC's competition here
USB-PH vs CS Comparison July 2026
USB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PH stands at 66.6B. In comparison, CS has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PH is priced at $18.59, while CS trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.81, whereas CS's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, USB-PH's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CS's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PH is less volatile compared to CS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PH.Check CS's competition here
USB-PH vs FRBT Comparison July 2026
USB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PH stands at 66.6B. In comparison, FRBT has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PH is priced at $18.59, while FRBT trades at $20.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.81, whereas FRBT's P/E ratio is 11.29. In terms of profitability, USB-PH's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FRBT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PH is less volatile compared to FRBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PH.Check FRBT's competition here
USB-PH vs TANNL Comparison July 2026
USB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PH stands at 66.6B. In comparison, TANNL has a market cap of 989.3M. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PH is priced at $18.59, while TANNL trades at $25.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.81, whereas TANNL's P/E ratio is 34.88. In terms of profitability, USB-PH's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TANNL's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PH is more volatile compared to TANNL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PH.Check TANNL's competition here
USB-PH vs FRC-PL Comparison July 2026
USB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PH stands at 66.6B. In comparison, FRC-PL has a market cap of 312.2M. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PH is priced at $18.59, while FRC-PL trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.81, whereas FRC-PL's P/E ratio is 0.22. In terms of profitability, USB-PH's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FRC-PL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PH is less volatile compared to FRC-PL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PH.Check FRC-PL's competition here
USB-PH vs WBK Comparison July 2026
USB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PH stands at 66.6B. In comparison, WBK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PH is priced at $18.59, while WBK trades at $14.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.81, whereas WBK's P/E ratio is 14.31. In terms of profitability, USB-PH's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WBK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PH is less volatile compared to WBK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PH.Check WBK's competition here