U.S. Bancorp (USB-PH) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (USB-PH) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Banks - Diversified Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| USB-PH | $18.84 | +0.78% | 67.5B | 4.06 | $4.64 | +3.54% |
| JPM-PL | $18.77 | +0.12% | 889.7B | 1.40 | $13.48 | +1.81% |
| JPM-PK | $18.50 | +0.43% | 889.2B | 1.37 | $13.48 | +1.81% |
| JPM-PM | $17.30 | +0.14% | 888.8B | 1.28 | $13.48 | +1.81% |
| JPM-PJ | $19.32 | +0.10% | 886.8B | 1.43 | $13.48 | +1.81% |
| JPM | $327.12 | -1.90% | 871.6B | 15.57 | $20.89 | +1.81% |
| JPM-PC | $25.38 | +0.14% | 800.8B | 1.88 | $13.48 | +1.81% |
| JPM-PD | $24.26 | +0.25% | 780.5B | 1.80 | $13.48 | +1.81% |
| BAC-PL | $1,246.68 | +0.17% | 462.6B | 355.00 | $3.51 | +1.99% |
| BAC-PP | $16.70 | -0.30% | 410.8B | 4.79 | $3.51 | +1.99% |
Stock Comparison
USB-PH vs JPM-PL Comparison June 2026
USB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PH stands at 67.5B. In comparison, JPM-PL has a market cap of 889.7B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PH is priced at $18.84, while JPM-PL trades at $18.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.06, whereas JPM-PL's P/E ratio is 1.40. In terms of profitability, USB-PH's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JPM-PL's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PH is more volatile compared to JPM-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PH.Check JPM-PL's competition here
USB-PH vs JPM-PK Comparison June 2026
USB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PH stands at 67.5B. In comparison, JPM-PK has a market cap of 889.2B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PH is priced at $18.84, while JPM-PK trades at $18.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.06, whereas JPM-PK's P/E ratio is 1.37. In terms of profitability, USB-PH's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JPM-PK's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PH is more volatile compared to JPM-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PH.Check JPM-PK's competition here
USB-PH vs JPM-PM Comparison June 2026
USB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PH stands at 67.5B. In comparison, JPM-PM has a market cap of 888.8B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PH is priced at $18.84, while JPM-PM trades at $17.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.06, whereas JPM-PM's P/E ratio is 1.28. In terms of profitability, USB-PH's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JPM-PM's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PH is more volatile compared to JPM-PM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PH.Check JPM-PM's competition here
USB-PH vs JPM-PJ Comparison June 2026
USB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PH stands at 67.5B. In comparison, JPM-PJ has a market cap of 886.8B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PH is priced at $18.84, while JPM-PJ trades at $19.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.06, whereas JPM-PJ's P/E ratio is 1.43. In terms of profitability, USB-PH's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JPM-PJ's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PH is more volatile compared to JPM-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PH.Check JPM-PJ's competition here
USB-PH vs JPM Comparison June 2026
USB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PH stands at 67.5B. In comparison, JPM has a market cap of 871.6B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PH is priced at $18.84, while JPM trades at $327.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.06, whereas JPM's P/E ratio is 15.57. In terms of profitability, USB-PH's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JPM's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PH is less volatile compared to JPM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PH.Check JPM's competition here
USB-PH vs JPM-PC Comparison June 2026
USB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PH stands at 67.5B. In comparison, JPM-PC has a market cap of 800.8B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PH is priced at $18.84, while JPM-PC trades at $25.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.06, whereas JPM-PC's P/E ratio is 1.88. In terms of profitability, USB-PH's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JPM-PC's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PH is more volatile compared to JPM-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PH.Check JPM-PC's competition here
USB-PH vs JPM-PD Comparison June 2026
USB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PH stands at 67.5B. In comparison, JPM-PD has a market cap of 780.5B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PH is priced at $18.84, while JPM-PD trades at $24.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.06, whereas JPM-PD's P/E ratio is 1.80. In terms of profitability, USB-PH's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JPM-PD's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PH is more volatile compared to JPM-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PH.Check JPM-PD's competition here
USB-PH vs BAC-PL Comparison June 2026
USB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PH stands at 67.5B. In comparison, BAC-PL has a market cap of 462.6B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PH is priced at $18.84, while BAC-PL trades at $1,246.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.06, whereas BAC-PL's P/E ratio is 355.00. In terms of profitability, USB-PH's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BAC-PL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PH is more volatile compared to BAC-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PH.Check BAC-PL's competition here
USB-PH vs BAC-PP Comparison June 2026
USB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PH stands at 67.5B. In comparison, BAC-PP has a market cap of 410.8B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PH is priced at $18.84, while BAC-PP trades at $16.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.06, whereas BAC-PP's P/E ratio is 4.79. In terms of profitability, USB-PH's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BAC-PP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PH is more volatile compared to BAC-PP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PH.Check BAC-PP's competition here
USB-PH vs BAC-PQ Comparison June 2026
USB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PH stands at 67.5B. In comparison, BAC-PQ has a market cap of 408.9B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PH is priced at $18.84, while BAC-PQ trades at $17.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.06, whereas BAC-PQ's P/E ratio is 4.85. In terms of profitability, USB-PH's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BAC-PQ's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PH is more volatile compared to BAC-PQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PH.Check BAC-PQ's competition here
USB-PH vs BAC-PM Comparison June 2026
USB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PH stands at 67.5B. In comparison, BAC-PM has a market cap of 408.1B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PH is priced at $18.84, while BAC-PM trades at $21.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.06, whereas BAC-PM's P/E ratio is 6.08. In terms of profitability, USB-PH's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BAC-PM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PH is more volatile compared to BAC-PM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PH.Check BAC-PM's competition here
USB-PH vs BAC-PN Comparison June 2026
USB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PH stands at 67.5B. In comparison, BAC-PN has a market cap of 407.5B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PH is priced at $18.84, while BAC-PN trades at $20.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.06, whereas BAC-PN's P/E ratio is 5.70. In terms of profitability, USB-PH's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BAC-PN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PH is more volatile compared to BAC-PN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PH.Check BAC-PN's competition here
USB-PH vs BAC-PS Comparison June 2026
USB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PH stands at 67.5B. In comparison, BAC-PS has a market cap of 407B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PH is priced at $18.84, while BAC-PS trades at $19.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.06, whereas BAC-PS's P/E ratio is 5.43. In terms of profitability, USB-PH's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BAC-PS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PH is more volatile compared to BAC-PS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PH.Check BAC-PS's competition here
USB-PH vs BAC-PO Comparison June 2026
USB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PH stands at 67.5B. In comparison, BAC-PO has a market cap of 406.5B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PH is priced at $18.84, while BAC-PO trades at $17.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.06, whereas BAC-PO's P/E ratio is 5.00. In terms of profitability, USB-PH's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BAC-PO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PH is more volatile compared to BAC-PO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PH.Check BAC-PO's competition here
USB-PH vs BAC Comparison June 2026
USB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PH stands at 67.5B. In comparison, BAC has a market cap of 398.8B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PH is priced at $18.84, while BAC trades at $57.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.06, whereas BAC's P/E ratio is 13.95. In terms of profitability, USB-PH's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BAC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PH is more volatile compared to BAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PH.Check BAC's competition here
USB-PH vs BAC-PB Comparison June 2026
USB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PH stands at 67.5B. In comparison, BAC-PB has a market cap of 351.4B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PH is priced at $18.84, while BAC-PB trades at $25.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.06, whereas BAC-PB's P/E ratio is 7.16. In terms of profitability, USB-PH's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BAC-PB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PH is more volatile compared to BAC-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PH.Check BAC-PB's competition here
USB-PH vs BAC-PK Comparison June 2026
USB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PH stands at 67.5B. In comparison, BAC-PK has a market cap of 349.5B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PH is priced at $18.84, while BAC-PK trades at $24.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.06, whereas BAC-PK's P/E ratio is 7.03. In terms of profitability, USB-PH's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BAC-PK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PH is more volatile compared to BAC-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PH.Check BAC-PK's competition here
USB-PH vs BML-PL Comparison June 2026
USB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PH stands at 67.5B. In comparison, BML-PL has a market cap of 330.6B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PH is priced at $18.84, while BML-PL trades at $19.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.06, whereas BML-PL's P/E ratio is 5.55. In terms of profitability, USB-PH's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BML-PL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PH is more volatile compared to BML-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PH.Check BML-PL's competition here
USB-PH vs HSBC Comparison June 2026
USB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PH stands at 67.5B. In comparison, HSBC has a market cap of 326.4B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PH is priced at $18.84, while HSBC trades at $96.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.06, whereas HSBC's P/E ratio is 15.70. In terms of profitability, USB-PH's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HSBC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PH is more volatile compared to HSBC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PH.Check HSBC's competition here
USB-PH vs BML-PJ Comparison June 2026
USB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PH stands at 67.5B. In comparison, BML-PJ has a market cap of 324.9B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PH is priced at $18.84, while BML-PJ trades at $19.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.06, whereas BML-PJ's P/E ratio is 5.68. In terms of profitability, USB-PH's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BML-PJ's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PH is more volatile compared to BML-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PH.Check BML-PJ's competition here
USB-PH vs BML-PH Comparison June 2026
USB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PH stands at 67.5B. In comparison, BML-PH has a market cap of 323.2B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PH is priced at $18.84, while BML-PH trades at $19.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.06, whereas BML-PH's P/E ratio is 5.47. In terms of profitability, USB-PH's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BML-PH's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PH is more volatile compared to BML-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PH.Check BML-PH's competition here
USB-PH vs BML-PG Comparison June 2026
USB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PH stands at 67.5B. In comparison, BML-PG has a market cap of 318.1B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PH is priced at $18.84, while BML-PG trades at $18.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.06, whereas BML-PG's P/E ratio is 5.41. In terms of profitability, USB-PH's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BML-PG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PH is more volatile compared to BML-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PH.Check BML-PG's competition here
USB-PH vs BAC-PE Comparison June 2026
USB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PH stands at 67.5B. In comparison, BAC-PE has a market cap of 312.2B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PH is priced at $18.84, while BAC-PE trades at $18.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.06, whereas BAC-PE's P/E ratio is 5.37. In terms of profitability, USB-PH's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BAC-PE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PH is more volatile compared to BAC-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PH.Check BAC-PE's competition here
USB-PH vs RY Comparison June 2026
USB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PH stands at 67.5B. In comparison, RY has a market cap of 281.5B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PH is priced at $18.84, while RY trades at $201.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.06, whereas RY's P/E ratio is 18.29. In terms of profitability, USB-PH's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PH is more volatile compared to RY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PH.Check RY's competition here
USB-PH vs WFC Comparison June 2026
USB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PH stands at 67.5B. In comparison, WFC has a market cap of 251.6B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PH is priced at $18.84, while WFC trades at $83.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.06, whereas WFC's P/E ratio is 12.42. In terms of profitability, USB-PH's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WFC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PH is more volatile compared to WFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PH.Check WFC's competition here
USB-PH vs WFC-PC Comparison June 2026
USB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PH stands at 67.5B. In comparison, WFC-PC has a market cap of 251.6B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PH is priced at $18.84, while WFC-PC trades at $17.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.06, whereas WFC-PC's P/E ratio is 59.69. In terms of profitability, USB-PH's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WFC-PC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PH is more volatile compared to WFC-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PH.Check WFC-PC's competition here
USB-PH vs WFC-PA Comparison June 2026
USB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PH stands at 67.5B. In comparison, WFC-PA has a market cap of 251.6B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PH is priced at $18.84, while WFC-PA trades at $18.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.06, whereas WFC-PA's P/E ratio is 3.83. In terms of profitability, USB-PH's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WFC-PA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PH is more volatile compared to WFC-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PH.Check WFC-PA's competition here
USB-PH vs WFC-PD Comparison June 2026
USB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PH stands at 67.5B. In comparison, WFC-PD has a market cap of 251.6B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PH is priced at $18.84, while WFC-PD trades at $16.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.06, whereas WFC-PD's P/E ratio is 3.49. In terms of profitability, USB-PH's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WFC-PD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PH is more volatile compared to WFC-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PH.Check WFC-PD's competition here
USB-PH vs C Comparison June 2026
USB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PH stands at 67.5B. In comparison, C has a market cap of 244.1B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PH is priced at $18.84, while C trades at $145.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.06, whereas C's P/E ratio is 17.69. In terms of profitability, USB-PH's ROE is +0.12%, compared to C's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PH is less volatile compared to C. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PH.Check C's competition here
USB-PH vs WFC-PL Comparison June 2026
USB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PH stands at 67.5B. In comparison, WFC-PL has a market cap of 240B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PH is priced at $18.84, while WFC-PL trades at $1,179.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.06, whereas WFC-PL's P/E ratio is 243.07. In terms of profitability, USB-PH's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WFC-PL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PH is more volatile compared to WFC-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PH.Check WFC-PL's competition here
USB-PH vs MUFG Comparison June 2026
USB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PH stands at 67.5B. In comparison, MUFG has a market cap of 237.9B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PH is priced at $18.84, while MUFG trades at $20.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.06, whereas MUFG's P/E ratio is 15.85. In terms of profitability, USB-PH's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MUFG's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PH is more volatile compared to MUFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PH.Check MUFG's competition here
USB-PH vs TD Comparison June 2026
USB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PH stands at 67.5B. In comparison, TD has a market cap of 201.5B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PH is priced at $18.84, while TD trades at $119.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.06, whereas TD's P/E ratio is 19.56. In terms of profitability, USB-PH's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PH is more volatile compared to TD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PH.Check TD's competition here
USB-PH vs WFC-PQ Comparison June 2026
USB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PH stands at 67.5B. In comparison, WFC-PQ has a market cap of 200.9B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PH is priced at $18.84, while WFC-PQ trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.06, whereas WFC-PQ's P/E ratio is 5.17. In terms of profitability, USB-PH's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WFC-PQ's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PH is more volatile compared to WFC-PQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PH.Check WFC-PQ's competition here
USB-PH vs SAN Comparison June 2026
USB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PH stands at 67.5B. In comparison, SAN has a market cap of 198.2B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PH is priced at $18.84, while SAN trades at $13.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.06, whereas SAN's P/E ratio is 13.11. In terms of profitability, USB-PH's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SAN's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PH is more volatile compared to SAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PH.Check SAN's competition here
USB-PH vs WFC-PY Comparison June 2026
USB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PH stands at 67.5B. In comparison, WFC-PY has a market cap of 188.3B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PH is priced at $18.84, while WFC-PY trades at $23.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.06, whereas WFC-PY's P/E ratio is 4.77. In terms of profitability, USB-PH's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WFC-PY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PH is more volatile compared to WFC-PY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PH.Check WFC-PY's competition here
USB-PH vs WFC-PR Comparison June 2026
USB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PH stands at 67.5B. In comparison, WFC-PR has a market cap of 184.2B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PH is priced at $18.84, while WFC-PR trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.06, whereas WFC-PR's P/E ratio is 5.17. In terms of profitability, USB-PH's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WFC-PR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PH is more volatile compared to WFC-PR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PH.Check WFC-PR's competition here
USB-PH vs UBS Comparison June 2026
USB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PH stands at 67.5B. In comparison, UBS has a market cap of 166.5B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PH is priced at $18.84, while UBS trades at $51.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.06, whereas UBS's P/E ratio is 18.21. In terms of profitability, USB-PH's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UBS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PH is more volatile compared to UBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PH.Check UBS's competition here
USB-PH vs BBVA Comparison June 2026
USB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PH stands at 67.5B. In comparison, BBVA has a market cap of 136.4B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PH is priced at $18.84, while BBVA trades at $24.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.06, whereas BBVA's P/E ratio is 11.60. In terms of profitability, USB-PH's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BBVA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PH is more volatile compared to BBVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PH.Check BBVA's competition here
USB-PH vs C-PJ Comparison June 2026
USB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PH stands at 67.5B. In comparison, C-PJ has a market cap of 122.2B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PH is priced at $18.84, while C-PJ trades at $25.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.06, whereas C-PJ's P/E ratio is 2.95. In terms of profitability, USB-PH's ROE is +0.12%, compared to C-PJ's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PH is more volatile compared to C-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PH.Check C-PJ's competition here
USB-PH vs BMO Comparison June 2026
USB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PH stands at 67.5B. In comparison, BMO has a market cap of 119.6B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PH is priced at $18.84, while BMO trades at $171.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.06, whereas BMO's P/E ratio is 18.33. In terms of profitability, USB-PH's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BMO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PH is more volatile compared to BMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PH.Check BMO's competition here
USB-PH vs BNS Comparison June 2026
USB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PH stands at 67.5B. In comparison, BNS has a market cap of 106.7B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PH is priced at $18.84, while BNS trades at $87.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.06, whereas BNS's P/E ratio is 16.77. In terms of profitability, USB-PH's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BNS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PH is more volatile compared to BNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PH.Check BNS's competition here
USB-PH vs CM Comparison June 2026
USB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PH stands at 67.5B. In comparison, CM has a market cap of 103.5B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PH is priced at $18.84, while CM trades at $113.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.06, whereas CM's P/E ratio is 15.47. In terms of profitability, USB-PH's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CM's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PH is more volatile compared to CM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PH.Check CM's competition here
USB-PH vs RY-PT Comparison June 2026
USB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PH stands at 67.5B. In comparison, RY-PT has a market cap of 98.8B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PH is priced at $18.84, while RY-PT trades at $25.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.06, whereas RY-PT's P/E ratio is 2.84. In terms of profitability, USB-PH's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RY-PT's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PH is more volatile compared to RY-PT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PH.Check RY-PT's competition here
USB-PH vs SMFG Comparison June 2026
USB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PH stands at 67.5B. In comparison, SMFG has a market cap of 97.7B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PH is priced at $18.84, while SMFG trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.06, whereas SMFG's P/E ratio is 16.38. In terms of profitability, USB-PH's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SMFG's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PH is more volatile compared to SMFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PH.Check SMFG's competition here
USB-PH vs USB Comparison June 2026
USB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PH stands at 67.5B. In comparison, USB has a market cap of 90.3B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PH is priced at $18.84, while USB trades at $58.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.06, whereas USB's P/E ratio is 12.19. In terms of profitability, USB-PH's ROE is +0.12%, compared to USB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PH is more volatile compared to USB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PH.Check USB's competition here
USB-PH vs ING Comparison June 2026
USB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PH stands at 67.5B. In comparison, ING has a market cap of 90.2B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PH is priced at $18.84, while ING trades at $32.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.06, whereas ING's P/E ratio is 12.35. In terms of profitability, USB-PH's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ING's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PH is less volatile compared to ING. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PH.Check ING's competition here
USB-PH vs USB-PQ Comparison June 2026
USB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PH stands at 67.5B. In comparison, USB-PQ has a market cap of 90.1B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PH is priced at $18.84, while USB-PQ trades at $14.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.06, whereas USB-PQ's P/E ratio is 3.22. In terms of profitability, USB-PH's ROE is +0.12%, compared to USB-PQ's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PH is more volatile compared to USB-PQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PH.Check USB-PQ's competition here
USB-PH vs USB-PR Comparison June 2026
USB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PH stands at 67.5B. In comparison, USB-PR has a market cap of 90B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PH is priced at $18.84, while USB-PR trades at $15.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.06, whereas USB-PR's P/E ratio is 3.38. In terms of profitability, USB-PH's ROE is +0.12%, compared to USB-PR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PH is more volatile compared to USB-PR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PH.Check USB-PR's competition here
USB-PH vs BCS Comparison June 2026
USB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PH stands at 67.5B. In comparison, BCS has a market cap of 88.8B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PH is priced at $18.84, while BCS trades at $27.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.06, whereas BCS's P/E ratio is 11.24. In terms of profitability, USB-PH's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BCS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PH is less volatile compared to BCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PH.Check BCS's competition here
USB-PH vs USB-PP Comparison June 2026
USB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PH stands at 67.5B. In comparison, USB-PP has a market cap of 68.3B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PH is priced at $18.84, while USB-PP trades at $21.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.06, whereas USB-PP's P/E ratio is 4.70. In terms of profitability, USB-PH's ROE is +0.12%, compared to USB-PP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PH is more volatile compared to USB-PP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PH.Check USB-PP's competition here
USB-PH vs NU Comparison June 2026
USB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PH stands at 67.5B. In comparison, NU has a market cap of 61.6B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PH is priced at $18.84, while NU trades at $12.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.06, whereas NU's P/E ratio is 19.55. In terms of profitability, USB-PH's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NU's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PH is less volatile compared to NU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PH.Check NU's competition here
USB-PH vs WFC-PZ Comparison June 2026
USB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PH stands at 67.5B. In comparison, WFC-PZ has a market cap of 58.9B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PH is priced at $18.84, while WFC-PZ trades at $18.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.06, whereas WFC-PZ's P/E ratio is 3.87. In terms of profitability, USB-PH's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WFC-PZ's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PH is more volatile compared to WFC-PZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PH.Check WFC-PZ's competition here
USB-PH vs C-PK Comparison June 2026
USB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PH stands at 67.5B. In comparison, C-PK has a market cap of 48.1B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PH is priced at $18.84, while C-PK trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.06, whereas C-PK's P/E ratio is 2.94. In terms of profitability, USB-PH's ROE is +0.12%, compared to C-PK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PH is more volatile compared to C-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PH.Check C-PK's competition here
USB-PH vs NWG Comparison June 2026
USB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PH stands at 67.5B. In comparison, NWG has a market cap of 33.4B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PH is priced at $18.84, while NWG trades at $17.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.06, whereas NWG's P/E ratio is 8.92. In terms of profitability, USB-PH's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NWG's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PH is less volatile compared to NWG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PH.Check NWG's competition here
USB-PH vs NTRSO Comparison June 2026
USB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PH stands at 67.5B. In comparison, NTRSO has a market cap of 32.5B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PH is priced at $18.84, while NTRSO trades at $18.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.06, whereas NTRSO's P/E ratio is 2.57. In terms of profitability, USB-PH's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NTRSO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PH is more volatile compared to NTRSO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PH.Check NTRSO's competition here
USB-PH vs NTRS Comparison June 2026
USB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PH stands at 67.5B. In comparison, NTRS has a market cap of 31.8B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PH is priced at $18.84, while NTRS trades at $173.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.06, whereas NTRS's P/E ratio is 18.02. In terms of profitability, USB-PH's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NTRS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PH is more volatile compared to NTRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PH.Check NTRS's competition here
USB-PH vs BAP Comparison June 2026
USB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PH stands at 67.5B. In comparison, BAP has a market cap of 30.4B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PH is priced at $18.84, while BAP trades at $383.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.06, whereas BAP's P/E ratio is 14.65. In terms of profitability, USB-PH's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BAP's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PH is less volatile compared to BAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PH.Check BAP's competition here
USB-PH vs EWBC Comparison June 2026
USB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PH stands at 67.5B. In comparison, EWBC has a market cap of 17.4B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PH is priced at $18.84, while EWBC trades at $127.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.06, whereas EWBC's P/E ratio is 12.67. In terms of profitability, USB-PH's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EWBC's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PH is more volatile compared to EWBC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PH.Check EWBC's competition here
USB-PH vs CS Comparison June 2026
USB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PH stands at 67.5B. In comparison, CS has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PH is priced at $18.84, while CS trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.06, whereas CS's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, USB-PH's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CS's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PH is less volatile compared to CS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PH.Check CS's competition here
USB-PH vs NTB Comparison June 2026
USB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PH stands at 67.5B. In comparison, NTB has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PH is priced at $18.84, while NTB trades at $58.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.06, whereas NTB's P/E ratio is 10.15. In terms of profitability, USB-PH's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NTB's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PH is more volatile compared to NTB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PH.Check NTB's competition here
USB-PH vs TANNL Comparison June 2026
USB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PH stands at 67.5B. In comparison, TANNL has a market cap of 989.3M. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PH is priced at $18.84, while TANNL trades at $25.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.06, whereas TANNL's P/E ratio is 34.88. In terms of profitability, USB-PH's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TANNL's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PH is more volatile compared to TANNL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PH.Check TANNL's competition here
USB-PH vs FRBT Comparison June 2026
USB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PH stands at 67.5B. In comparison, FRBT has a market cap of 915.7M. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PH is priced at $18.84, while FRBT trades at $18.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.06, whereas FRBT's P/E ratio is 10.11. In terms of profitability, USB-PH's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FRBT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PH is more volatile compared to FRBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PH.Check FRBT's competition here
USB-PH vs FRC-PL Comparison June 2026
USB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PH stands at 67.5B. In comparison, FRC-PL has a market cap of 312.2M. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PH is priced at $18.84, while FRC-PL trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.06, whereas FRC-PL's P/E ratio is 0.22. In terms of profitability, USB-PH's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FRC-PL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PH is less volatile compared to FRC-PL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PH.Check FRC-PL's competition here
USB-PH vs WBK Comparison June 2026
USB-PH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PH stands at 67.5B. In comparison, WBK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PH is priced at $18.84, while WBK trades at $14.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PH currently has a P/E ratio of 4.06, whereas WBK's P/E ratio is 14.31. In terms of profitability, USB-PH's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WBK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PH is less volatile compared to WBK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PH.Check WBK's competition here