Vitesse Energy, Inc.
Vitesse Energy, Inc. (VTS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (VTS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VTS | $19.26 | -2.31% | 787.2M | 30.92 | $0.64 | +11.33% |
| COP | $121.31 | +0.87% | 149B | 19.19 | $6.35 | +2.65% |
| CNQ | $48.51 | -0.12% | 101B | 12.36 | $3.92 | +3.49% |
| EOG | $134.59 | +1.17% | 72.5B | 14.64 | $9.13 | +2.98% |
| PXD | $269.62 | +0.73% | 63B | 13.33 | $20.22 | +4.06% |
| OXY | $57.32 | -1.87% | 57.1B | 42.87 | $1.35 | +1.69% |
| FANG | $181.55 | +2.56% | 51.9B | 31.88 | $5.72 | +2.21% |
| HES | $148.97 | +0.00% | 46.1B | 20.66 | $7.21 | +0.67% |
| WDS | $22.14 | -0.85% | 42B | 15.62 | $1.42 | +4.86% |
| EQT | $64.32 | -0.50% | 40.2B | 19.45 | $3.31 | +1.00% |
Stock Comparison
VTS vs COP Comparison March 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 787.2M. In comparison, COP has a market cap of 149B. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $19.26, while COP trades at $121.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas COP's P/E ratio is 19.19. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to COP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is more volatile compared to COP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check COP's competition here
VTS vs CNQ Comparison March 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 787.2M. In comparison, CNQ has a market cap of 101B. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $19.26, while CNQ trades at $48.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas CNQ's P/E ratio is 12.36. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CNQ's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is more volatile compared to CNQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check CNQ's competition here
VTS vs EOG Comparison March 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 787.2M. In comparison, EOG has a market cap of 72.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $19.26, while EOG trades at $134.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas EOG's P/E ratio is 14.64. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to EOG's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is more volatile compared to EOG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check EOG's competition here
VTS vs PXD Comparison March 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 787.2M. In comparison, PXD has a market cap of 63B. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $19.26, while PXD trades at $269.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas PXD's P/E ratio is 13.33. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PXD's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is more volatile compared to PXD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check PXD's competition here
VTS vs OXY Comparison March 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 787.2M. In comparison, OXY has a market cap of 57.1B. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $19.26, while OXY trades at $57.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas OXY's P/E ratio is 42.87. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to OXY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is more volatile compared to OXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check OXY's competition here
VTS vs FANG Comparison March 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 787.2M. In comparison, FANG has a market cap of 51.9B. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $19.26, while FANG trades at $181.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas FANG's P/E ratio is 31.88. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FANG's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is more volatile compared to FANG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check FANG's competition here
VTS vs HES Comparison March 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 787.2M. In comparison, HES has a market cap of 46.1B. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $19.26, while HES trades at $148.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas HES's P/E ratio is 20.66. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HES's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is more volatile compared to HES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check HES's competition here
VTS vs WDS Comparison March 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 787.2M. In comparison, WDS has a market cap of 42B. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $19.26, while WDS trades at $22.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas WDS's P/E ratio is 15.62. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to WDS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is more volatile compared to WDS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check WDS's competition here
VTS vs EQT Comparison March 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 787.2M. In comparison, EQT has a market cap of 40.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $19.26, while EQT trades at $64.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas EQT's P/E ratio is 19.45. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to EQT's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is more volatile compared to EQT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check EQT's competition here
VTS vs TPL Comparison March 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 787.2M. In comparison, TPL has a market cap of 36.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $19.26, while TPL trades at $522.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas TPL's P/E ratio is 76.06. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TPL's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is more volatile compared to TPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check TPL's competition here
VTS vs OXY-WT Comparison March 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 787.2M. In comparison, OXY-WT has a market cap of 35.4B. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $19.26, while OXY-WT trades at $35.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas OXY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to OXY-WT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is less volatile compared to OXY-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check OXY-WT's competition here
VTS vs DVN Comparison March 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 787.2M. In comparison, DVN has a market cap of 28.7B. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $19.26, while DVN trades at $46.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas DVN's P/E ratio is 11.09. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DVN's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is less volatile compared to DVN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check DVN's competition here
VTS vs EXE Comparison March 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 787.2M. In comparison, EXE has a market cap of 25.7B. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $19.26, while EXE trades at $107.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas EXE's P/E ratio is 14.14. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to EXE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is less volatile compared to EXE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check EXE's competition here
VTS vs CTRA Comparison March 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 787.2M. In comparison, CTRA has a market cap of 24.4B. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $19.26, while CTRA trades at $32.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas CTRA's P/E ratio is 14.35. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CTRA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is less volatile compared to CTRA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check CTRA's competition here
VTS vs COG Comparison March 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 787.2M. In comparison, COG has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $19.26, while COG trades at $22.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas COG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to COG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is less volatile compared to COG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check COG's competition here
VTS vs MRO Comparison March 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 787.2M. In comparison, MRO has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $19.26, while MRO trades at $28.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas MRO's P/E ratio is 12.31. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MRO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is more volatile compared to MRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check MRO's competition here
VTS vs OVV Comparison March 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 787.2M. In comparison, OVV has a market cap of 15.7B. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $19.26, while OVV trades at $55.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas OVV's P/E ratio is 11.58. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to OVV's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is less volatile compared to OVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check OVV's competition here
VTS vs PR Comparison March 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 787.2M. In comparison, PR has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $19.26, while PR trades at $19.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas PR's P/E ratio is 15.12. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is less volatile compared to PR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check PR's competition here
VTS vs AR Comparison March 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 787.2M. In comparison, AR has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $19.26, while AR trades at $41.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas AR's P/E ratio is 20.18. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is less volatile compared to AR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check AR's competition here
VTS vs APA Comparison March 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 787.2M. In comparison, APA has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $19.26, while APA trades at $34.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas APA's P/E ratio is 8.64. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to APA's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is less volatile compared to APA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check APA's competition here
VTS vs CHK Comparison March 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 787.2M. In comparison, CHK has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $19.26, while CHK trades at $81.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas CHK's P/E ratio is 26.88. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CHK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is more volatile compared to CHK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check CHK's competition here
VTS vs RRC Comparison March 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 787.2M. In comparison, RRC has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $19.26, while RRC trades at $43.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas RRC's P/E ratio is 15.89. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to RRC's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is less volatile compared to RRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check RRC's competition here
VTS vs CHKEW Comparison March 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 787.2M. In comparison, CHKEW has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $19.26, while CHKEW trades at $71.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas CHKEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CHKEW's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is more volatile compared to CHKEW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check CHKEW's competition here
VTS vs CHKEZ Comparison March 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 787.2M. In comparison, CHKEZ has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $19.26, while CHKEZ trades at $64.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas CHKEZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CHKEZ's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is more volatile compared to CHKEZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check CHKEZ's competition here
VTS vs CHKEL Comparison March 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 787.2M. In comparison, CHKEL has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $19.26, while CHKEL trades at $62.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas CHKEL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CHKEL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is more volatile compared to CHKEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check CHKEL's competition here
VTS vs SWN Comparison March 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 787.2M. In comparison, SWN has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $19.26, while SWN trades at $7.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas SWN's P/E ratio is -2.84. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SWN's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is more volatile compared to SWN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check SWN's competition here
VTS vs MTDR Comparison March 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 787.2M. In comparison, MTDR has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $19.26, while MTDR trades at $56.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas MTDR's P/E ratio is 9.39. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MTDR's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is less volatile compared to MTDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check MTDR's competition here
VTS vs CHRD Comparison March 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 787.2M. In comparison, CHRD has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $19.26, while CHRD trades at $125.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas CHRD's P/E ratio is 166.82. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CHRD's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is less volatile compared to CHRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check CHRD's competition here
VTS vs VIST Comparison March 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 787.2M. In comparison, VIST has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $19.26, while VIST trades at $65.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas VIST's P/E ratio is 9.66. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to VIST's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is less volatile compared to VIST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check VIST's competition here
VTS vs CRK Comparison March 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 787.2M. In comparison, CRK has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $19.26, while CRK trades at $20.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas CRK's P/E ratio is 14.56. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CRK's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is less volatile compared to CRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check CRK's competition here
VTS vs CNX Comparison March 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 787.2M. In comparison, CNX has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $19.26, while CNX trades at $42.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas CNX's P/E ratio is 10.59. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CNX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is more volatile compared to CNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check CNX's competition here
VTS vs CEO Comparison March 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 787.2M. In comparison, CEO has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $19.26, while CEO trades at $121.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas CEO's P/E ratio is 10.59. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CEO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is less volatile compared to CEO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check CEO's competition here
VTS vs CRC Comparison March 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 787.2M. In comparison, CRC has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $19.26, while CRC trades at $62.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas CRC's P/E ratio is 14.81. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CRC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is less volatile compared to CRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check CRC's competition here
VTS vs MGY Comparison March 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 787.2M. In comparison, MGY has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $19.26, while MGY trades at $29.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas MGY's P/E ratio is 17.05. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MGY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is more volatile compared to MGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check MGY's competition here
VTS vs CPG Comparison March 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 787.2M. In comparison, CPG has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $19.26, while CPG trades at $8.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas CPG's P/E ratio is 23.86. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CPG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is more volatile compared to CPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check CPG's competition here
VTS vs MUR Comparison March 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 787.2M. In comparison, MUR has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $19.26, while MUR trades at $36.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas MUR's P/E ratio is 51.11. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MUR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is less volatile compared to MUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check MUR's competition here
VTS vs OAS Comparison March 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 787.2M. In comparison, OAS has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $19.26, while OAS trades at $109.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas OAS's P/E ratio is 8.90. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to OAS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is less volatile compared to OAS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check OAS's competition here
VTS vs DEN Comparison March 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 787.2M. In comparison, DEN has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $19.26, while DEN trades at $88.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas DEN's P/E ratio is 9.94. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DEN's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is more volatile compared to DEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check DEN's competition here
VTS vs BCEI Comparison March 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 787.2M. In comparison, BCEI has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $19.26, while BCEI trades at $54.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas BCEI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BCEI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is less volatile compared to BCEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check BCEI's competition here
VTS vs CDEV Comparison March 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 787.2M. In comparison, CDEV has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $19.26, while CDEV trades at $7.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas CDEV's P/E ratio is 5.52. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CDEV's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is less volatile compared to CDEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check CDEV's competition here
VTS vs ERF Comparison March 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 787.2M. In comparison, ERF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $19.26, while ERF trades at $20.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas ERF's P/E ratio is 11.22. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ERF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is more volatile compared to ERF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check ERF's competition here
VTS vs CRGY Comparison March 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 787.2M. In comparison, CRGY has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $19.26, while CRGY trades at $11.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas CRGY's P/E ratio is 22.20. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CRGY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is less volatile compared to CRGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check CRGY's competition here
VTS vs GPOR Comparison March 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 787.2M. In comparison, GPOR has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $19.26, while GPOR trades at $202.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas GPOR's P/E ratio is 9.16. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GPOR's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is less volatile compared to GPOR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check GPOR's competition here
VTS vs VRN Comparison March 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 787.2M. In comparison, VRN has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $19.26, while VRN trades at $6.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas VRN's P/E ratio is 18.21. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to VRN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is less volatile compared to VRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check VRN's competition here
VTS vs BSM Comparison March 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 787.2M. In comparison, BSM has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $19.26, while BSM trades at $15.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas BSM's P/E ratio is 12.02. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BSM's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is more volatile compared to BSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check BSM's competition here
VTS vs BTE Comparison March 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 787.2M. In comparison, BTE has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $19.26, while BTE trades at $4.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas BTE's P/E ratio is -15.50. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BTE's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is less volatile compared to BTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check BTE's competition here
VTS vs SM Comparison March 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 787.2M. In comparison, SM has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $19.26, while SM trades at $26.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas SM's P/E ratio is 4.75. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SM's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is less volatile compared to SM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check SM's competition here
VTS vs ESTE Comparison March 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 787.2M. In comparison, ESTE has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $19.26, while ESTE trades at $21.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas ESTE's P/E ratio is 4.64. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ESTE's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is less volatile compared to ESTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check ESTE's competition here
VTS vs BKV Comparison March 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 787.2M. In comparison, BKV has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $19.26, while BKV trades at $28.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas BKV's P/E ratio is 14.51. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BKV's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is more volatile compared to BKV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check BKV's competition here
VTS vs NOG Comparison March 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 787.2M. In comparison, NOG has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $19.26, while NOG trades at $27.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas NOG's P/E ratio is 70.49. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NOG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is less volatile compared to NOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check NOG's competition here
VTS vs CLMT Comparison March 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 787.2M. In comparison, CLMT has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $19.26, while CLMT trades at $28.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas CLMT's P/E ratio is -73.31. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CLMT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is less volatile compared to CLMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check CLMT's competition here
VTS vs CPE Comparison March 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 787.2M. In comparison, CPE has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $19.26, while CPE trades at $35.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas CPE's P/E ratio is 5.78. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CPE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is more volatile compared to CPE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check CPE's competition here
VTS vs TALO Comparison March 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 787.2M. In comparison, TALO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $19.26, while TALO trades at $13.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas TALO's P/E ratio is -4.90. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TALO's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is less volatile compared to TALO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check TALO's competition here
VTS vs CIVI Comparison March 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 787.2M. In comparison, CIVI has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $19.26, while CIVI trades at $27.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas CIVI's P/E ratio is 3.97. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CIVI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is less volatile compared to CIVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check CIVI's competition here
VTS vs MNR Comparison March 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 787.2M. In comparison, MNR has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $19.26, while MNR trades at $13.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas MNR's P/E ratio is 14.53. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MNR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is more volatile compared to MNR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check MNR's competition here
VTS vs STRDW Comparison March 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 787.2M. In comparison, STRDW has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $19.26, while STRDW trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas STRDW's P/E ratio is 0.27. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to STRDW's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is more volatile compared to STRDW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check STRDW's competition here
VTS vs VET Comparison March 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 787.2M. In comparison, VET has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $19.26, while VET trades at $11.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas VET's P/E ratio is 24.05. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to VET's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is less volatile compared to VET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check VET's competition here
VTS vs KRP Comparison March 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 787.2M. In comparison, KRP has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $19.26, while KRP trades at $14.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas KRP's P/E ratio is 23.73. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to KRP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is more volatile compared to KRP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check KRP's competition here
VTS vs NEXT Comparison March 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 787.2M. In comparison, NEXT has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $19.26, while NEXT trades at $5.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas NEXT's P/E ratio is -7.80. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NEXT's ROE of -1.51%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is less volatile compared to NEXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check NEXT's competition here
VTS vs HHRS Comparison March 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 787.2M. In comparison, HHRS has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $19.26, while HHRS trades at $15.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas HHRS's P/E ratio is -46.42. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HHRS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is more volatile compared to HHRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check HHRS's competition here
VTS vs DMLP Comparison March 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 787.2M. In comparison, DMLP has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $19.26, while DMLP trades at $27.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas DMLP's P/E ratio is 23.25. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DMLP's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is more volatile compared to DMLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check DMLP's competition here
VTS vs FLMN Comparison March 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 787.2M. In comparison, FLMN has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $19.26, while FLMN trades at $7.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas FLMN's P/E ratio is 64.75. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FLMN's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is more volatile compared to FLMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check FLMN's competition here
VTS vs KOS Comparison March 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 787.2M. In comparison, KOS has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $19.26, while KOS trades at $2.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas KOS's P/E ratio is -1.58. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to KOS's ROE of -0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is less volatile compared to KOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check KOS's competition here
VTS vs SBR Comparison March 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 787.2M. In comparison, SBR has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $19.26, while SBR trades at $75.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas SBR's P/E ratio is 14.86. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SBR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is less volatile compared to SBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check SBR's competition here
VTS vs SBOW Comparison March 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 787.2M. In comparison, SBOW has a market cap of 940.4M. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $19.26, while SBOW trades at $36.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas SBOW's P/E ratio is 4.69. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SBOW's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is less volatile compared to SBOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check SBOW's competition here
VTS vs IMPPP Comparison March 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 787.2M. In comparison, IMPPP has a market cap of 912M. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $19.26, while IMPPP trades at $26.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas IMPPP's P/E ratio is -67.44. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to IMPPP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is more volatile compared to IMPPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check IMPPP's competition here
VTS vs TELL Comparison March 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 787.2M. In comparison, TELL has a market cap of 893M. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $19.26, while TELL trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas TELL's P/E ratio is -4.34. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TELL's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is more volatile compared to TELL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check TELL's competition here
VTS vs HPK Comparison March 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 787.2M. In comparison, HPK has a market cap of 754.8M. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $19.26, while HPK trades at $6.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas HPK's P/E ratio is 15.41. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HPK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is less volatile compared to HPK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check HPK's competition here
VTS vs REPX Comparison March 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 787.2M. In comparison, REPX has a market cap of 727.2M. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $19.26, while REPX trades at $33.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas REPX's P/E ratio is 8.15. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to REPX's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is less volatile compared to REPX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check REPX's competition here
VTS vs ROCC Comparison March 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 787.2M. In comparison, ROCC has a market cap of 712.3M. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $19.26, while ROCC trades at $37.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas ROCC's P/E ratio is 2.74. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ROCC's ROE of +1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is less volatile compared to ROCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check ROCC's competition here
VTS vs VTLE Comparison March 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 787.2M. In comparison, VTLE has a market cap of 693.3M. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $19.26, while VTLE trades at $17.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas VTLE's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to VTLE's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is less volatile compared to VTLE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check VTLE's competition here
VTS vs TXO Comparison March 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 787.2M. In comparison, TXO has a market cap of 682.8M. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $19.26, while TXO trades at $12.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas TXO's P/E ratio is -28.74. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TXO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is less volatile compared to TXO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check TXO's competition here
VTS vs GRNT Comparison March 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 787.2M. In comparison, GRNT has a market cap of 677.9M. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $19.26, while GRNT trades at $5.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas GRNT's P/E ratio is 17.81. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GRNT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is less volatile compared to GRNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check GRNT's competition here
VTS vs TBN Comparison March 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 787.2M. In comparison, TBN has a market cap of 645.9M. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $19.26, while TBN trades at $29.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas TBN's P/E ratio is -15.02. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TBN's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is less volatile compared to TBN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check TBN's competition here
VTS vs SD Comparison March 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 787.2M. In comparison, SD has a market cap of 621.8M. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $19.26, while SD trades at $16.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas SD's P/E ratio is 9.45. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is more volatile compared to SD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check SD's competition here
VTS vs PVAC Comparison March 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 787.2M. In comparison, PVAC has a market cap of 581.3M. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $19.26, while PVAC trades at $30.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas PVAC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PVAC's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is less volatile compared to PVAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check PVAC's competition here
VTS vs OBE Comparison March 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 787.2M. In comparison, OBE has a market cap of 572.1M. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $19.26, while OBE trades at $8.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas OBE's P/E ratio is 23.61. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to OBE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is less volatile compared to OBE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check OBE's competition here
VTS vs EGY Comparison March 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 787.2M. In comparison, EGY has a market cap of 561.4M. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $19.26, while EGY trades at $5.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas EGY's P/E ratio is 19.94. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to EGY's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is less volatile compared to EGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check EGY's competition here
VTS vs WTI Comparison March 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 787.2M. In comparison, WTI has a market cap of 500.6M. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $19.26, while WTI trades at $3.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas WTI's P/E ratio is -3.40. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to WTI's ROE of +1.08%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is less volatile compared to WTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check WTI's competition here
VTS vs GPRK Comparison March 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 787.2M. In comparison, GPRK has a market cap of 454.1M. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $19.26, while GPRK trades at $8.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas GPRK's P/E ratio is 9.16. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GPRK's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is less volatile compared to GPRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check GPRK's competition here
VTS vs GFR Comparison March 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 787.2M. In comparison, GFR has a market cap of 418.7M. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $19.26, while GFR trades at $5.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas GFR's P/E ratio is 4.81. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GFR's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is more volatile compared to GFR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check GFR's competition here
VTS vs PNRG Comparison March 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 787.2M. In comparison, PNRG has a market cap of 339.1M. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $19.26, while PNRG trades at $209.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas PNRG's P/E ratio is 19.66. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PNRG's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is less volatile compared to PNRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check PNRG's competition here
VTS vs REI Comparison March 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 787.2M. In comparison, REI has a market cap of 310.8M. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $19.26, while REI trades at $1.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas REI's P/E ratio is -18.75. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to REI's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is less volatile compared to REI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check REI's competition here
VTS vs BATL Comparison March 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 787.2M. In comparison, BATL has a market cap of 308.9M. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $19.26, while BATL trades at $15.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas BATL's P/E ratio is -5.59. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BATL's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is less volatile compared to BATL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check BATL's competition here
VTS vs GTE Comparison March 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 787.2M. In comparison, GTE has a market cap of 289.1M. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $19.26, while GTE trades at $8.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas GTE's P/E ratio is -1.51. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GTE's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is less volatile compared to GTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check GTE's competition here
VTS vs INR Comparison March 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 787.2M. In comparison, INR has a market cap of 284.5M. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $19.26, while INR trades at $18.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas INR's P/E ratio is -20.92. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to INR's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is less volatile compared to INR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check INR's competition here
VTS vs AMPY Comparison March 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 787.2M. In comparison, AMPY has a market cap of 264.7M. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $19.26, while AMPY trades at $6.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas AMPY's P/E ratio is -8.72. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AMPY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is less volatile compared to AMPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check AMPY's competition here
VTS vs BRY Comparison March 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 787.2M. In comparison, BRY has a market cap of 253M. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $19.26, while BRY trades at $3.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas BRY's P/E ratio is -2.79. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BRY's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is more volatile compared to BRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check BRY's competition here
VTS vs SJT Comparison March 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 787.2M. In comparison, SJT has a market cap of 228.8M. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $19.26, while SJT trades at $4.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas SJT's P/E ratio is -491.00. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SJT's ROE of -2.12%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is less volatile compared to SJT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check SJT's competition here
VTS vs KGEI Comparison March 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 787.2M. In comparison, KGEI has a market cap of 170.6M. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $19.26, while KGEI trades at $4.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas KGEI's P/E ratio is 9.85. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to KGEI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is less volatile compared to KGEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check KGEI's competition here
VTS vs IMPP Comparison March 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 787.2M. In comparison, IMPP has a market cap of 167.4M. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $19.26, while IMPP trades at $4.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas IMPP's P/E ratio is 4.32. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to IMPP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is less volatile compared to IMPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check IMPP's competition here
VTS vs PHX Comparison March 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 787.2M. In comparison, PHX has a market cap of 165M. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $19.26, while PHX trades at $4.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas PHX's P/E ratio is 22.89. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PHX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is more volatile compared to PHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check PHX's competition here
VTS vs EPM Comparison March 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 787.2M. In comparison, EPM has a market cap of 164.3M. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $19.26, while EPM trades at $4.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas EPM's P/E ratio is 58.69. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to EPM's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is less volatile compared to EPM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check EPM's competition here
VTS vs ANNA Comparison March 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 787.2M. In comparison, ANNA has a market cap of 161M. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $19.26, while ANNA trades at $3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas ANNA's P/E ratio is -18.00. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ANNA's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is less volatile compared to ANNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check ANNA's competition here
VTS vs EPSN Comparison March 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 787.2M. In comparison, EPSN has a market cap of 123.7M. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $19.26, while EPSN trades at $5.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas EPSN's P/E ratio is 20.78. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to EPSN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is less volatile compared to EPSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check EPSN's competition here
VTS vs EP Comparison March 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 787.2M. In comparison, EP has a market cap of 108.8M. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $19.26, while EP trades at $3.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas EP's P/E ratio is -5.94. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to EP's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is more volatile compared to EP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check EP's competition here
VTS vs PED Comparison March 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 787.2M. In comparison, PED has a market cap of 87.1M. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $19.26, while PED trades at $16.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas PED's P/E ratio is 8.26. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PED's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is less volatile compared to PED. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check PED's competition here
VTS vs SAFX Comparison March 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 787.2M. In comparison, SAFX has a market cap of 82.7M. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $19.26, while SAFX trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas SAFX's P/E ratio is 0.74. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SAFX's ROE of +14.25%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is less volatile compared to SAFX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check SAFX's competition here
VTS vs NRT Comparison March 2026
VTS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VTS stands at 787.2M. In comparison, NRT has a market cap of 82.7M. Regarding current trading prices, VTS is priced at $19.26, while NRT trades at $8.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VTS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.92, whereas NRT's P/E ratio is 8.65. In terms of profitability, VTS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NRT's ROE of +6.89%. Regarding short-term risk, VTS is less volatile compared to NRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VTS.Check NRT's competition here