UPL Limited (UPL.BO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (UPL.BO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Agricultural Inputs Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UPL.BO | ₹611.00 | -2.56% | 515.7B | 27.40 | ₹22.30 | +0.98% |
| FACT.NS | ₹901.35 | +2.89% | 583.2B | -1477.62 | -₹0.61 | +0.04% |
| FACT.BO | ₹899.55 | +2.67% | 582.1B | -1474.67 | -₹0.61 | +0.04% |
| COROMANDEL.NS | ₹1,880.70 | +4.07% | 553.9B | 28.34 | ₹66.37 | +0.58% |
| COROMANDEL.BO | ₹1,880.65 | +3.98% | 553.4B | 28.34 | ₹66.35 | +0.58% |
| UPL.NS | ₹611.00 | -2.77% | 515.8B | 27.39 | ₹22.31 | +0.98% |
| PIIND.BO | ₹2,806.35 | -2.05% | 425.9B | 32.20 | ₹87.15 | +0.53% |
| PIIND.NS | ₹2,807.70 | -2.05% | 425.9B | 32.28 | ₹86.97 | +0.53% |
| SUMICHEM.BO | ₹457.25 | -0.86% | 228.5B | 42.07 | ₹10.87 | +0.26% |
| SUMICHEM.NS | ₹456.65 | -1.10% | 227.9B | 42.05 | ₹10.86 | +0.26% |
Stock Comparison
UPL.BO vs FACT.NS Comparison June 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 515.7B. In comparison, FACT.NS has a market cap of 583.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹611.00, while FACT.NS trades at ₹901.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.40, whereas FACT.NS's P/E ratio is -1477.62. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FACT.NS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to FACT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check FACT.NS's competition here
UPL.BO vs FACT.BO Comparison June 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 515.7B. In comparison, FACT.BO has a market cap of 582.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹611.00, while FACT.BO trades at ₹899.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.40, whereas FACT.BO's P/E ratio is -1474.67. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FACT.BO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is less volatile compared to FACT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check FACT.BO's competition here
UPL.BO vs COROMANDEL.NS Comparison June 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 515.7B. In comparison, COROMANDEL.NS has a market cap of 553.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹611.00, while COROMANDEL.NS trades at ₹1,880.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.40, whereas COROMANDEL.NS's P/E ratio is 28.34. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to COROMANDEL.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to COROMANDEL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check COROMANDEL.NS's competition here
UPL.BO vs COROMANDEL.BO Comparison June 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 515.7B. In comparison, COROMANDEL.BO has a market cap of 553.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹611.00, while COROMANDEL.BO trades at ₹1,880.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.40, whereas COROMANDEL.BO's P/E ratio is 28.34. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to COROMANDEL.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to COROMANDEL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check COROMANDEL.BO's competition here
UPL.BO vs UPL.NS Comparison June 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 515.7B. In comparison, UPL.NS has a market cap of 515.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹611.00, while UPL.NS trades at ₹611.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.40, whereas UPL.NS's P/E ratio is 27.39. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to UPL.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is less volatile compared to UPL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check UPL.NS's competition here
UPL.BO vs PIIND.BO Comparison June 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 515.7B. In comparison, PIIND.BO has a market cap of 425.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹611.00, while PIIND.BO trades at ₹2,806.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.40, whereas PIIND.BO's P/E ratio is 32.20. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PIIND.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to PIIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check PIIND.BO's competition here
UPL.BO vs PIIND.NS Comparison June 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 515.7B. In comparison, PIIND.NS has a market cap of 425.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹611.00, while PIIND.NS trades at ₹2,807.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.40, whereas PIIND.NS's P/E ratio is 32.28. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PIIND.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to PIIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check PIIND.NS's competition here
UPL.BO vs SUMICHEM.BO Comparison June 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 515.7B. In comparison, SUMICHEM.BO has a market cap of 228.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹611.00, while SUMICHEM.BO trades at ₹457.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.40, whereas SUMICHEM.BO's P/E ratio is 42.07. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SUMICHEM.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to SUMICHEM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check SUMICHEM.BO's competition here
UPL.BO vs SUMICHEM.NS Comparison June 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 515.7B. In comparison, SUMICHEM.NS has a market cap of 227.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹611.00, while SUMICHEM.NS trades at ₹456.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.40, whereas SUMICHEM.NS's P/E ratio is 42.05. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SUMICHEM.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to SUMICHEM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check SUMICHEM.NS's competition here
UPL.BO vs BAYERCROP.NS Comparison June 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 515.7B. In comparison, BAYERCROP.NS has a market cap of 193.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹611.00, while BAYERCROP.NS trades at ₹4,298.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.40, whereas BAYERCROP.NS's P/E ratio is 28.02. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BAYERCROP.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to BAYERCROP.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check BAYERCROP.NS's competition here
UPL.BO vs BAYERCROP.BO Comparison June 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 515.7B. In comparison, BAYERCROP.BO has a market cap of 192.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹611.00, while BAYERCROP.BO trades at ₹4,300.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.40, whereas BAYERCROP.BO's P/E ratio is 28.04. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BAYERCROP.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to BAYERCROP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check BAYERCROP.BO's competition here
UPL.BO vs CHAMBLFERT.BO Comparison June 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 515.7B. In comparison, CHAMBLFERT.BO has a market cap of 191.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹611.00, while CHAMBLFERT.BO trades at ₹477.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.40, whereas CHAMBLFERT.BO's P/E ratio is 10.27. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CHAMBLFERT.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to CHAMBLFERT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check CHAMBLFERT.BO's competition here
UPL.BO vs CHAMBLFERT.NS Comparison June 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 515.7B. In comparison, CHAMBLFERT.NS has a market cap of 191.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹611.00, while CHAMBLFERT.NS trades at ₹477.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.40, whereas CHAMBLFERT.NS's P/E ratio is 9.80. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CHAMBLFERT.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to CHAMBLFERT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check CHAMBLFERT.NS's competition here
UPL.BO vs ATUL7.BO Comparison June 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 515.7B. In comparison, ATUL7.BO has a market cap of 179B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹611.00, while ATUL7.BO trades at ₹7,100.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.40, whereas ATUL7.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ATUL7.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to ATUL7.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check ATUL7.BO's competition here
UPL.BO vs EIDPARRY.NS Comparison June 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 515.7B. In comparison, EIDPARRY.NS has a market cap of 128.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹611.00, while EIDPARRY.NS trades at ₹723.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.40, whereas EIDPARRY.NS's P/E ratio is 10.83. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EIDPARRY.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to EIDPARRY.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check EIDPARRY.NS's competition here
UPL.BO vs EIDPARRY.BO Comparison June 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 515.7B. In comparison, EIDPARRY.BO has a market cap of 128.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹611.00, while EIDPARRY.BO trades at ₹723.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.40, whereas EIDPARRY.BO's P/E ratio is 11.18. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EIDPARRY.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to EIDPARRY.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check EIDPARRY.BO's competition here
UPL.BO vs PARADEEP.BO Comparison June 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 515.7B. In comparison, PARADEEP.BO has a market cap of 101.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹611.00, while PARADEEP.BO trades at ₹123.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.40, whereas PARADEEP.BO's P/E ratio is 12.91. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PARADEEP.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to PARADEEP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check PARADEEP.BO's competition here
UPL.BO vs PARADEEP.NS Comparison June 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 515.7B. In comparison, PARADEEP.NS has a market cap of 101.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹611.00, while PARADEEP.NS trades at ₹123.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.40, whereas PARADEEP.NS's P/E ratio is 12.91. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PARADEEP.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is less volatile compared to PARADEEP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check PARADEEP.NS's competition here
UPL.BO vs SHARDACROP.BO Comparison June 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 515.7B. In comparison, SHARDACROP.BO has a market cap of 81.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹611.00, while SHARDACROP.BO trades at ₹906.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.40, whereas SHARDACROP.BO's P/E ratio is 12.01. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SHARDACROP.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to SHARDACROP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check SHARDACROP.BO's competition here
UPL.BO vs SHARDACROP.NS Comparison June 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 515.7B. In comparison, SHARDACROP.NS has a market cap of 81.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹611.00, while SHARDACROP.NS trades at ₹902.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.40, whereas SHARDACROP.NS's P/E ratio is 11.96. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SHARDACROP.NS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to SHARDACROP.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check SHARDACROP.NS's competition here
UPL.BO vs RCF.BO Comparison June 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 515.7B. In comparison, RCF.BO has a market cap of 69.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹611.00, while RCF.BO trades at ₹125.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.40, whereas RCF.BO's P/E ratio is 16.23. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RCF.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to RCF.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check RCF.BO's competition here
UPL.BO vs RCF.NS Comparison June 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 515.7B. In comparison, RCF.NS has a market cap of 69.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹611.00, while RCF.NS trades at ₹125.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.40, whereas RCF.NS's P/E ratio is 16.19. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RCF.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is less volatile compared to RCF.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check RCF.NS's competition here
UPL.BO vs GSFC.NS Comparison June 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 515.7B. In comparison, GSFC.NS has a market cap of 65B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹611.00, while GSFC.NS trades at ₹163.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.40, whereas GSFC.NS's P/E ratio is 9.66. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GSFC.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to GSFC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check GSFC.NS's competition here
UPL.BO vs GSFC.BO Comparison June 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 515.7B. In comparison, GSFC.BO has a market cap of 64.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹611.00, while GSFC.BO trades at ₹163.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.40, whereas GSFC.BO's P/E ratio is 9.73. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GSFC.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to GSFC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check GSFC.BO's competition here
UPL.BO vs PICCADIL.BO Comparison June 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 515.7B. In comparison, PICCADIL.BO has a market cap of 56.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹611.00, while PICCADIL.BO trades at ₹577.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.40, whereas PICCADIL.BO's P/E ratio is 40.61. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PICCADIL.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to PICCADIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check PICCADIL.BO's competition here
UPL.BO vs MBAPL.NS Comparison June 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 515.7B. In comparison, MBAPL.NS has a market cap of 48.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹611.00, while MBAPL.NS trades at ₹556.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.40, whereas MBAPL.NS's P/E ratio is 32.47. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MBAPL.NS's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to MBAPL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check MBAPL.NS's competition here
UPL.BO vs DHANUKA.BO Comparison June 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 515.7B. In comparison, DHANUKA.BO has a market cap of 48.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹611.00, while DHANUKA.BO trades at ₹1,070.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.40, whereas DHANUKA.BO's P/E ratio is 16.79. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DHANUKA.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to DHANUKA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check DHANUKA.BO's competition here
UPL.BO vs DHANUKA.NS Comparison June 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 515.7B. In comparison, DHANUKA.NS has a market cap of 47.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹611.00, while DHANUKA.NS trades at ₹1,062.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.40, whereas DHANUKA.NS's P/E ratio is 16.69. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DHANUKA.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is less volatile compared to DHANUKA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check DHANUKA.NS's competition here
UPL.BO vs KSCL.NS Comparison June 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 515.7B. In comparison, KSCL.NS has a market cap of 45.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹611.00, while KSCL.NS trades at ₹876.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.40, whereas KSCL.NS's P/E ratio is 15.39. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KSCL.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to KSCL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check KSCL.NS's competition here
UPL.BO vs KSCL.BO Comparison June 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 515.7B. In comparison, KSCL.BO has a market cap of 45B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹611.00, while KSCL.BO trades at ₹875.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.40, whereas KSCL.BO's P/E ratio is 15.38. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KSCL.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to KSCL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check KSCL.BO's competition here
UPL.BO vs RALLIS.BO Comparison June 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 515.7B. In comparison, RALLIS.BO has a market cap of 44.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹611.00, while RALLIS.BO trades at ₹227.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.40, whereas RALLIS.BO's P/E ratio is 26.49. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RALLIS.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to RALLIS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check RALLIS.BO's competition here
UPL.BO vs RALLIS.NS Comparison June 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 515.7B. In comparison, RALLIS.NS has a market cap of 44.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹611.00, while RALLIS.NS trades at ₹226.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.40, whereas RALLIS.NS's P/E ratio is 24.02. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RALLIS.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to RALLIS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check RALLIS.NS's competition here
UPL.BO vs KRISHANA.NS Comparison June 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 515.7B. In comparison, KRISHANA.NS has a market cap of 41.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹611.00, while KRISHANA.NS trades at ₹665.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.40, whereas KRISHANA.NS's P/E ratio is 22.83. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KRISHANA.NS's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to KRISHANA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check KRISHANA.NS's competition here
UPL.BO vs CIANAGRO.BO Comparison June 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 515.7B. In comparison, CIANAGRO.BO has a market cap of 39B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹611.00, while CIANAGRO.BO trades at ₹1,393.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.40, whereas CIANAGRO.BO's P/E ratio is 34.65. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CIANAGRO.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is less volatile compared to CIANAGRO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check CIANAGRO.BO's competition here
UPL.BO vs NFL.NS Comparison June 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 515.7B. In comparison, NFL.NS has a market cap of 37B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹611.00, while NFL.NS trades at ₹75.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.40, whereas NFL.NS's P/E ratio is 17.50. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NFL.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to NFL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check NFL.NS's competition here
UPL.BO vs NFL.BO Comparison June 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 515.7B. In comparison, NFL.BO has a market cap of 37B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹611.00, while NFL.BO trades at ₹75.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.40, whereas NFL.BO's P/E ratio is 17.51. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NFL.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to NFL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check NFL.BO's competition here
UPL.BO vs MANGCHEFER.NS Comparison June 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 515.7B. In comparison, MANGCHEFER.NS has a market cap of 36.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹611.00, while MANGCHEFER.NS trades at ₹308.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.40, whereas MANGCHEFER.NS's P/E ratio is 22.67. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MANGCHEFER.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to MANGCHEFER.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check MANGCHEFER.NS's competition here
UPL.BO vs MANGCHEFER.BO Comparison June 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 515.7B. In comparison, MANGCHEFER.BO has a market cap of 36.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹611.00, while MANGCHEFER.BO trades at ₹308.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.40, whereas MANGCHEFER.BO's P/E ratio is 22.63. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MANGCHEFER.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to MANGCHEFER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check MANGCHEFER.BO's competition here
UPL.BO vs BNHOLDINGS.BO Comparison June 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 515.7B. In comparison, BNHOLDINGS.BO has a market cap of 34.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹611.00, while BNHOLDINGS.BO trades at ₹355.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.40, whereas BNHOLDINGS.BO's P/E ratio is 26.71. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BNHOLDINGS.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is less volatile compared to BNHOLDINGS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check BNHOLDINGS.BO's competition here
UPL.BO vs BHAGCHEM.NS Comparison June 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 515.7B. In comparison, BHAGCHEM.NS has a market cap of 34.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹611.00, while BHAGCHEM.NS trades at ₹267.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.40, whereas BHAGCHEM.NS's P/E ratio is 243.35. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BHAGCHEM.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is less volatile compared to BHAGCHEM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check BHAGCHEM.NS's competition here
UPL.BO vs BHAGCHEM.BO Comparison June 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 515.7B. In comparison, BHAGCHEM.BO has a market cap of 34.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹611.00, while BHAGCHEM.BO trades at ₹267.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.40, whereas BHAGCHEM.BO's P/E ratio is 241.35. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BHAGCHEM.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is less volatile compared to BHAGCHEM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check BHAGCHEM.BO's competition here
UPL.BO vs NACLIND.NS Comparison June 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 515.7B. In comparison, NACLIND.NS has a market cap of 32.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹611.00, while NACLIND.NS trades at ₹164.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.40, whereas NACLIND.NS's P/E ratio is 824.95. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NACLIND.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is less volatile compared to NACLIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check NACLIND.NS's competition here
UPL.BO vs NACLIND.BO Comparison June 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 515.7B. In comparison, NACLIND.BO has a market cap of 32.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹611.00, while NACLIND.BO trades at ₹164.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.40, whereas NACLIND.BO's P/E ratio is 824.75. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NACLIND.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is less volatile compared to NACLIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check NACLIND.BO's competition here
UPL.BO vs VENKYS.BO Comparison June 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 515.7B. In comparison, VENKYS.BO has a market cap of 24.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹611.00, while VENKYS.BO trades at ₹1,714.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.40, whereas VENKYS.BO's P/E ratio is -57.49. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VENKYS.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to VENKYS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check VENKYS.BO's competition here
UPL.BO vs KSE.NS Comparison June 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 515.7B. In comparison, KSE.NS has a market cap of 22.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹611.00, while KSE.NS trades at ₹697.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.40, whereas KSE.NS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KSE.NS's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to KSE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check KSE.NS's competition here
UPL.BO vs INSECTICID.NS Comparison June 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 515.7B. In comparison, INSECTICID.NS has a market cap of 20.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹611.00, while INSECTICID.NS trades at ₹707.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.40, whereas INSECTICID.NS's P/E ratio is 14.78. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to INSECTICID.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is less volatile compared to INSECTICID.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check INSECTICID.NS's competition here
UPL.BO vs INSECTICID.BO Comparison June 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 515.7B. In comparison, INSECTICID.BO has a market cap of 20.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹611.00, while INSECTICID.BO trades at ₹704.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.40, whereas INSECTICID.BO's P/E ratio is 14.72. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to INSECTICID.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is less volatile compared to INSECTICID.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check INSECTICID.BO's competition here
UPL.BO vs IPL.NS Comparison June 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 515.7B. In comparison, IPL.NS has a market cap of 18.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹611.00, while IPL.NS trades at ₹159.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.40, whereas IPL.NS's P/E ratio is 15.35. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IPL.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is less volatile compared to IPL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check IPL.NS's competition here
UPL.BO vs IPL.BO Comparison June 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 515.7B. In comparison, IPL.BO has a market cap of 18.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹611.00, while IPL.BO trades at ₹159.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.40, whereas IPL.BO's P/E ratio is 15.32. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IPL.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is less volatile compared to IPL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check IPL.BO's competition here
UPL.BO vs ASTEC.BO Comparison June 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 515.7B. In comparison, ASTEC.BO has a market cap of 17.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹611.00, while ASTEC.BO trades at ₹777.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.40, whereas ASTEC.BO's P/E ratio is -20.56. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ASTEC.BO's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is less volatile compared to ASTEC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check ASTEC.BO's competition here
UPL.BO vs ASTEC.NS Comparison June 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 515.7B. In comparison, ASTEC.NS has a market cap of 17.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹611.00, while ASTEC.NS trades at ₹775.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.40, whereas ASTEC.NS's P/E ratio is -20.52. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ASTEC.NS's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is less volatile compared to ASTEC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check ASTEC.NS's competition here
UPL.BO vs SPIC.BO Comparison June 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 515.7B. In comparison, SPIC.BO has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹611.00, while SPIC.BO trades at ₹67.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.40, whereas SPIC.BO's P/E ratio is 7.40. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SPIC.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is less volatile compared to SPIC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check SPIC.BO's competition here
UPL.BO vs SPIC.NS Comparison June 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 515.7B. In comparison, SPIC.NS has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹611.00, while SPIC.NS trades at ₹67.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.40, whereas SPIC.NS's P/E ratio is 6.49. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SPIC.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is less volatile compared to SPIC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check SPIC.NS's competition here
UPL.BO vs MOL.NS Comparison June 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 515.7B. In comparison, MOL.NS has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹611.00, while MOL.NS trades at ₹46.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.40, whereas MOL.NS's P/E ratio is 41.27. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MOL.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to MOL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check MOL.NS's competition here
UPL.BO vs MOL.BO Comparison June 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 515.7B. In comparison, MOL.BO has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹611.00, while MOL.BO trades at ₹46.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.40, whereas MOL.BO's P/E ratio is 41.20. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MOL.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to MOL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check MOL.BO's competition here
UPL.BO vs BHARATRAS.NS Comparison June 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 515.7B. In comparison, BHARATRAS.NS has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹611.00, while BHARATRAS.NS trades at ₹1,384.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.40, whereas BHARATRAS.NS's P/E ratio is 3.95. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BHARATRAS.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to BHARATRAS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check BHARATRAS.NS's competition here
UPL.BO vs BHARATRAS.BO Comparison June 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 515.7B. In comparison, BHARATRAS.BO has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹611.00, while BHARATRAS.BO trades at ₹1,383.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.40, whereas BHARATRAS.BO's P/E ratio is 17.24. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BHARATRAS.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to BHARATRAS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check BHARATRAS.BO's competition here
UPL.BO vs MADRASFERT.NS Comparison June 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 515.7B. In comparison, MADRASFERT.NS has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹611.00, while MADRASFERT.NS trades at ₹67.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.40, whereas MADRASFERT.NS's P/E ratio is 13.61. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MADRASFERT.NS's ROE of +6.18%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is less volatile compared to MADRASFERT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check MADRASFERT.NS's competition here
UPL.BO vs MADRASFERT.BO Comparison June 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 515.7B. In comparison, MADRASFERT.BO has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹611.00, while MADRASFERT.BO trades at ₹67.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.40, whereas MADRASFERT.BO's P/E ratio is 13.60. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MADRASFERT.BO's ROE of +6.18%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is less volatile compared to MADRASFERT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check MADRASFERT.BO's competition here
UPL.BO vs BSHSL.NS Comparison June 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 515.7B. In comparison, BSHSL.NS has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹611.00, while BSHSL.NS trades at ₹94.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.40, whereas BSHSL.NS's P/E ratio is 37.01. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BSHSL.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to BSHSL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check BSHSL.NS's competition here
UPL.BO vs DHARMAJ.NS Comparison June 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 515.7B. In comparison, DHARMAJ.NS has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹611.00, while DHARMAJ.NS trades at ₹275.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.40, whereas DHARMAJ.NS's P/E ratio is 17.00. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DHARMAJ.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to DHARMAJ.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check DHARMAJ.NS's competition here
UPL.BO vs DHARMAJ.BO Comparison June 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 515.7B. In comparison, DHARMAJ.BO has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹611.00, while DHARMAJ.BO trades at ₹273.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.40, whereas DHARMAJ.BO's P/E ratio is 16.90. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DHARMAJ.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to DHARMAJ.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check DHARMAJ.BO's competition here
UPL.BO vs ZUARI.BO Comparison June 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 515.7B. In comparison, ZUARI.BO has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹611.00, while ZUARI.BO trades at ₹215.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.40, whereas ZUARI.BO's P/E ratio is 0.98. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ZUARI.BO's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to ZUARI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check ZUARI.BO's competition here
UPL.BO vs ZUARI.NS Comparison June 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 515.7B. In comparison, ZUARI.NS has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹611.00, while ZUARI.NS trades at ₹215.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.40, whereas ZUARI.NS's P/E ratio is 0.98. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ZUARI.NS's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to ZUARI.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check ZUARI.NS's competition here
UPL.BO vs BLUECLOUDS.BO Comparison June 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 515.7B. In comparison, BLUECLOUDS.BO has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹611.00, while BLUECLOUDS.BO trades at ₹17.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.40, whereas BLUECLOUDS.BO's P/E ratio is 15.71. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BLUECLOUDS.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is less volatile compared to BLUECLOUDS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check BLUECLOUDS.BO's competition here
UPL.BO vs BAJAJST.BO Comparison June 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 515.7B. In comparison, BAJAJST.BO has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹611.00, while BAJAJST.BO trades at ₹368.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.40, whereas BAJAJST.BO's P/E ratio is 20.44. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BAJAJST.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to BAJAJST.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check BAJAJST.BO's competition here
UPL.BO vs HERANBA.BO Comparison June 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 515.7B. In comparison, HERANBA.BO has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹611.00, while HERANBA.BO trades at ₹188.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.40, whereas HERANBA.BO's P/E ratio is -9.86. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HERANBA.BO's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is less volatile compared to HERANBA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check HERANBA.BO's competition here
UPL.BO vs HERANBA.NS Comparison June 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 515.7B. In comparison, HERANBA.NS has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹611.00, while HERANBA.NS trades at ₹187.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.40, whereas HERANBA.NS's P/E ratio is -9.79. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HERANBA.NS's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is less volatile compared to HERANBA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check HERANBA.NS's competition here
UPL.BO vs SHINDL.BO Comparison June 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 515.7B. In comparison, SHINDL.BO has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹611.00, while SHINDL.BO trades at ₹157.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.40, whereas SHINDL.BO's P/E ratio is 38.67. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SHINDL.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to SHINDL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check SHINDL.BO's competition here
UPL.BO vs KSE.BO Comparison June 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 515.7B. In comparison, KSE.BO has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹611.00, while KSE.BO trades at ₹189.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.40, whereas KSE.BO's P/E ratio is 7.23. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KSE.BO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to KSE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check KSE.BO's competition here
UPL.BO vs BESTAGRO.NS Comparison June 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 515.7B. In comparison, BESTAGRO.NS has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹611.00, while BESTAGRO.NS trades at ₹15.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.40, whereas BESTAGRO.NS's P/E ratio is 63.00. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BESTAGRO.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is less volatile compared to BESTAGRO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check BESTAGRO.NS's competition here
UPL.BO vs BESTAGRO.BO Comparison June 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 515.7B. In comparison, BESTAGRO.BO has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹611.00, while BESTAGRO.BO trades at ₹15.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.40, whereas BESTAGRO.BO's P/E ratio is 62.68. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BESTAGRO.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is less volatile compared to BESTAGRO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check BESTAGRO.BO's competition here
UPL.BO vs SVRL.BO Comparison June 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 515.7B. In comparison, SVRL.BO has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹611.00, while SVRL.BO trades at ₹251.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.40, whereas SVRL.BO's P/E ratio is 14.54. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SVRL.BO's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to SVRL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check SVRL.BO's competition here
UPL.BO vs MODINATUR.BO Comparison June 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 515.7B. In comparison, MODINATUR.BO has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹611.00, while MODINATUR.BO trades at ₹407.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.40, whereas MODINATUR.BO's P/E ratio is 10.71. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MODINATUR.BO's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is less volatile compared to MODINATUR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check MODINATUR.BO's competition here
UPL.BO vs KHAICHEM.BO Comparison June 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 515.7B. In comparison, KHAICHEM.BO has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹611.00, while KHAICHEM.BO trades at ₹55.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.40, whereas KHAICHEM.BO's P/E ratio is 7.77. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KHAICHEM.BO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to KHAICHEM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check KHAICHEM.BO's competition here
UPL.BO vs KHAICHEM.NS Comparison June 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 515.7B. In comparison, KHAICHEM.NS has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹611.00, while KHAICHEM.NS trades at ₹54.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.40, whereas KHAICHEM.NS's P/E ratio is 7.73. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KHAICHEM.NS's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to KHAICHEM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check KHAICHEM.NS's competition here
UPL.BO vs KNAGRI.NS Comparison June 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 515.7B. In comparison, KNAGRI.NS has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹611.00, while KNAGRI.NS trades at ₹190.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.40, whereas KNAGRI.NS's P/E ratio is 12.90. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KNAGRI.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to KNAGRI.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check KNAGRI.NS's competition here
UPL.BO vs RAMAPHO.BO Comparison June 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 515.7B. In comparison, RAMAPHO.BO has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹611.00, while RAMAPHO.BO trades at ₹120.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.40, whereas RAMAPHO.BO's P/E ratio is 8.10. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RAMAPHO.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to RAMAPHO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check RAMAPHO.BO's competition here
UPL.BO vs RAMAPHO.NS Comparison June 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 515.7B. In comparison, RAMAPHO.NS has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹611.00, while RAMAPHO.NS trades at ₹121.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.40, whereas RAMAPHO.NS's P/E ratio is 8.12. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RAMAPHO.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to RAMAPHO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check RAMAPHO.NS's competition here
UPL.BO vs ARIES.NS Comparison June 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 515.7B. In comparison, ARIES.NS has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹611.00, while ARIES.NS trades at ₹326.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.40, whereas ARIES.NS's P/E ratio is 9.91. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ARIES.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is less volatile compared to ARIES.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check ARIES.NS's competition here
UPL.BO vs ARIES.BO Comparison June 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 515.7B. In comparison, ARIES.BO has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹611.00, while ARIES.BO trades at ₹327.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.40, whereas ARIES.BO's P/E ratio is 9.93. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ARIES.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is less volatile compared to ARIES.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check ARIES.BO's competition here
UPL.BO vs GOODRICKE.BO Comparison June 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 515.7B. In comparison, GOODRICKE.BO has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹611.00, while GOODRICKE.BO trades at ₹175.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.40, whereas GOODRICKE.BO's P/E ratio is 14.80. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GOODRICKE.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to GOODRICKE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check GOODRICKE.BO's competition here
UPL.BO vs MISHTANN.BO Comparison June 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 515.7B. In comparison, MISHTANN.BO has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹611.00, while MISHTANN.BO trades at ₹3.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.40, whereas MISHTANN.BO's P/E ratio is 1.43. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MISHTANN.BO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is less volatile compared to MISHTANN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check MISHTANN.BO's competition here
UPL.BO vs IGCL.NS Comparison June 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 515.7B. In comparison, IGCL.NS has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹611.00, while IGCL.NS trades at ₹58.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.40, whereas IGCL.NS's P/E ratio is 8.64. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IGCL.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is less volatile compared to IGCL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check IGCL.NS's competition here
UPL.BO vs NATHBIOGEN.BO Comparison June 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 515.7B. In comparison, NATHBIOGEN.BO has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹611.00, while NATHBIOGEN.BO trades at ₹169.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.40, whereas NATHBIOGEN.BO's P/E ratio is 8.10. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NATHBIOGEN.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to NATHBIOGEN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check NATHBIOGEN.BO's competition here
UPL.BO vs NATHBIOGEN.NS Comparison June 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 515.7B. In comparison, NATHBIOGEN.NS has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹611.00, while NATHBIOGEN.NS trades at ₹169.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.40, whereas NATHBIOGEN.NS's P/E ratio is 8.08. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NATHBIOGEN.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to NATHBIOGEN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check NATHBIOGEN.NS's competition here
UPL.BO vs KINGSINFR.BO Comparison June 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 515.7B. In comparison, KINGSINFR.BO has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹611.00, while KINGSINFR.BO trades at ₹127.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.40, whereas KINGSINFR.BO's P/E ratio is 19.28. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KINGSINFR.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to KINGSINFR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check KINGSINFR.BO's competition here
UPL.BO vs SBECSUG.BO Comparison June 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 515.7B. In comparison, SBECSUG.BO has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹611.00, while SBECSUG.BO trades at ₹63.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.40, whereas SBECSUG.BO's P/E ratio is 16.16. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SBECSUG.BO's ROE of -1.29%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to SBECSUG.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check SBECSUG.BO's competition here
UPL.BO vs HOACFOODS.NS Comparison June 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 515.7B. In comparison, HOACFOODS.NS has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹611.00, while HOACFOODS.NS trades at ₹618.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.40, whereas HOACFOODS.NS's P/E ratio is 91.29. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HOACFOODS.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is less volatile compared to HOACFOODS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check HOACFOODS.NS's competition here
UPL.BO vs NOVAAGRI.NS Comparison June 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 515.7B. In comparison, NOVAAGRI.NS has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹611.00, while NOVAAGRI.NS trades at ₹28.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.40, whereas NOVAAGRI.NS's P/E ratio is 19.68. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NOVAAGRI.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to NOVAAGRI.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check NOVAAGRI.NS's competition here
UPL.BO vs NAGAFERT.BO Comparison June 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 515.7B. In comparison, NAGAFERT.BO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹611.00, while NAGAFERT.BO trades at ₹3.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.40, whereas NAGAFERT.BO's P/E ratio is -8.09. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NAGAFERT.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to NAGAFERT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check NAGAFERT.BO's competition here
UPL.BO vs NAGAFERT.NS Comparison June 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 515.7B. In comparison, NAGAFERT.NS has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹611.00, while NAGAFERT.NS trades at ₹3.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.40, whereas NAGAFERT.NS's P/E ratio is -7.87. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NAGAFERT.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is less volatile compared to NAGAFERT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check NAGAFERT.NS's competition here
UPL.BO vs RBS.NS Comparison June 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 515.7B. In comparison, RBS.NS has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹611.00, while RBS.NS trades at ₹87.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.40, whereas RBS.NS's P/E ratio is 12.77. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RBS.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to RBS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check RBS.NS's competition here
UPL.BO vs VIJSOLX.BO Comparison June 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 515.7B. In comparison, VIJSOLX.BO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹611.00, while VIJSOLX.BO trades at ₹608.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.40, whereas VIJSOLX.BO's P/E ratio is 10.09. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VIJSOLX.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to VIJSOLX.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check VIJSOLX.BO's competition here
UPL.BO vs INDOUS.BO Comparison June 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 515.7B. In comparison, INDOUS.BO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹611.00, while INDOUS.BO trades at ₹93.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.40, whereas INDOUS.BO's P/E ratio is 14.25. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to INDOUS.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is less volatile compared to INDOUS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check INDOUS.BO's competition here
UPL.BO vs INDOUS.NS Comparison June 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 515.7B. In comparison, INDOUS.NS has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹611.00, while INDOUS.NS trades at ₹92.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.40, whereas INDOUS.NS's P/E ratio is 14.18. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to INDOUS.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is less volatile compared to INDOUS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check INDOUS.NS's competition here
UPL.BO vs EQUIPPP.NS Comparison June 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 515.7B. In comparison, EQUIPPP.NS has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹611.00, while EQUIPPP.NS trades at ₹17.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.40, whereas EQUIPPP.NS's P/E ratio is 95.50. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EQUIPPP.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is less volatile compared to EQUIPPP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check EQUIPPP.NS's competition here
UPL.BO vs EQUIPPP.BO Comparison June 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 515.7B. In comparison, EQUIPPP.BO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹611.00, while EQUIPPP.BO trades at ₹17.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.40, whereas EQUIPPP.BO's P/E ratio is 95.61. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EQUIPPP.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is less volatile compared to EQUIPPP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check EQUIPPP.BO's competition here
UPL.BO vs NARMADA.NS Comparison June 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 515.7B. In comparison, NARMADA.NS has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹611.00, while NARMADA.NS trades at ₹43.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.40, whereas NARMADA.NS's P/E ratio is 42.71. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NARMADA.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is less volatile compared to NARMADA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check NARMADA.NS's competition here