UPL Limited (UPL.BO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (UPL.BO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Agricultural Inputs Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UPL.BO | ₹606.45 | +3.04% | 512.1B | 26.64 | ₹22.77 | +0.99% |
| COROMANDEL.BO | ₹2,032.30 | +1.24% | 600.9B | 30.62 | ₹66.37 | +0.88% |
| COROMANDEL.NS | ₹2,023.10 | +0.84% | 599.1B | 30.73 | ₹66.19 | +0.88% |
| FACT.NS | ₹877.10 | -0.01% | 571.6B | -1453.75 | -₹0.61 | +0.04% |
| FACT.BO | ₹881.00 | +0.52% | 569.8B | -1449.97 | -₹0.61 | +0.04% |
| UPL.NS | ₹608.60 | +3.37% | 512.7B | 28.81 | ₹21.08 | +0.99% |
| PIIND.NS | ₹2,651.40 | +1.64% | 401.4B | 30.63 | ₹86.40 | +0.57% |
| PIIND.BO | ₹2,646.50 | +1.43% | 401.4B | 30.58 | ₹86.54 | +0.57% |
| SUMICHEM.NS | ₹493.20 | +11.79% | 250.7B | 52.38 | ₹9.59 | +0.24% |
| SUMICHEM.BO | ₹501.75 | +13.80% | 249.2B | 45.08 | ₹11.13 | +0.24% |
Stock Comparison
UPL.BO vs COROMANDEL.BO Comparison July 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 512.1B. In comparison, COROMANDEL.BO has a market cap of 600.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹606.45, while COROMANDEL.BO trades at ₹2,032.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas COROMANDEL.BO's P/E ratio is 30.62. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to COROMANDEL.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to COROMANDEL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check COROMANDEL.BO's competition here
UPL.BO vs COROMANDEL.NS Comparison July 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 512.1B. In comparison, COROMANDEL.NS has a market cap of 599.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹606.45, while COROMANDEL.NS trades at ₹2,023.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas COROMANDEL.NS's P/E ratio is 30.73. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to COROMANDEL.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to COROMANDEL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check COROMANDEL.NS's competition here
UPL.BO vs FACT.NS Comparison July 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 512.1B. In comparison, FACT.NS has a market cap of 571.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹606.45, while FACT.NS trades at ₹877.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas FACT.NS's P/E ratio is -1453.75. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FACT.NS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to FACT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check FACT.NS's competition here
UPL.BO vs FACT.BO Comparison July 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 512.1B. In comparison, FACT.BO has a market cap of 569.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹606.45, while FACT.BO trades at ₹881.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas FACT.BO's P/E ratio is -1449.97. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FACT.BO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to FACT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check FACT.BO's competition here
UPL.BO vs UPL.NS Comparison July 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 512.1B. In comparison, UPL.NS has a market cap of 512.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹606.45, while UPL.NS trades at ₹608.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas UPL.NS's P/E ratio is 28.81. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to UPL.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to UPL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check UPL.NS's competition here
UPL.BO vs PIIND.NS Comparison July 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 512.1B. In comparison, PIIND.NS has a market cap of 401.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹606.45, while PIIND.NS trades at ₹2,651.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas PIIND.NS's P/E ratio is 30.63. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PIIND.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to PIIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check PIIND.NS's competition here
UPL.BO vs PIIND.BO Comparison July 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 512.1B. In comparison, PIIND.BO has a market cap of 401.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹606.45, while PIIND.BO trades at ₹2,646.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas PIIND.BO's P/E ratio is 30.58. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PIIND.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to PIIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check PIIND.BO's competition here
UPL.BO vs SUMICHEM.NS Comparison July 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 512.1B. In comparison, SUMICHEM.NS has a market cap of 250.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹606.45, while SUMICHEM.NS trades at ₹493.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas SUMICHEM.NS's P/E ratio is 52.38. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SUMICHEM.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to SUMICHEM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check SUMICHEM.NS's competition here
UPL.BO vs SUMICHEM.BO Comparison July 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 512.1B. In comparison, SUMICHEM.BO has a market cap of 249.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹606.45, while SUMICHEM.BO trades at ₹501.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas SUMICHEM.BO's P/E ratio is 45.08. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SUMICHEM.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is less volatile compared to SUMICHEM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check SUMICHEM.BO's competition here
UPL.BO vs CHAMBLFERT.NS Comparison July 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 512.1B. In comparison, CHAMBLFERT.NS has a market cap of 192.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹606.45, while CHAMBLFERT.NS trades at ₹479.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas CHAMBLFERT.NS's P/E ratio is 9.89. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CHAMBLFERT.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to CHAMBLFERT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check CHAMBLFERT.NS's competition here
UPL.BO vs CHAMBLFERT.BO Comparison July 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 512.1B. In comparison, CHAMBLFERT.BO has a market cap of 192.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹606.45, while CHAMBLFERT.BO trades at ₹481.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas CHAMBLFERT.BO's P/E ratio is 9.89. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CHAMBLFERT.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to CHAMBLFERT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check CHAMBLFERT.BO's competition here
UPL.BO vs BAYERCROP.NS Comparison July 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 512.1B. In comparison, BAYERCROP.NS has a market cap of 185.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹606.45, while BAYERCROP.NS trades at ₹4,139.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas BAYERCROP.NS's P/E ratio is 26.96. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BAYERCROP.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to BAYERCROP.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check BAYERCROP.NS's competition here
UPL.BO vs BAYERCROP.BO Comparison July 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 512.1B. In comparison, BAYERCROP.BO has a market cap of 185.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹606.45, while BAYERCROP.BO trades at ₹4,138.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas BAYERCROP.BO's P/E ratio is 26.98. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BAYERCROP.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to BAYERCROP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check BAYERCROP.BO's competition here
UPL.BO vs ATUL7.BO Comparison July 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 512.1B. In comparison, ATUL7.BO has a market cap of 179B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹606.45, while ATUL7.BO trades at ₹7,100.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas ATUL7.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ATUL7.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to ATUL7.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check ATUL7.BO's competition here
UPL.BO vs EIDPARRY.BO Comparison July 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 512.1B. In comparison, EIDPARRY.BO has a market cap of 132.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹606.45, while EIDPARRY.BO trades at ₹742.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas EIDPARRY.BO's P/E ratio is 10.47. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EIDPARRY.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to EIDPARRY.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check EIDPARRY.BO's competition here
UPL.BO vs EIDPARRY.NS Comparison July 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 512.1B. In comparison, EIDPARRY.NS has a market cap of 132.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹606.45, while EIDPARRY.NS trades at ₹738.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas EIDPARRY.NS's P/E ratio is 29.02. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EIDPARRY.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to EIDPARRY.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check EIDPARRY.NS's competition here
UPL.BO vs PARADEEP.BO Comparison July 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 512.1B. In comparison, PARADEEP.BO has a market cap of 119.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹606.45, while PARADEEP.BO trades at ₹146.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas PARADEEP.BO's P/E ratio is 13.07. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PARADEEP.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is less volatile compared to PARADEEP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check PARADEEP.BO's competition here
UPL.BO vs PARADEEP.NS Comparison July 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 512.1B. In comparison, PARADEEP.NS has a market cap of 119.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹606.45, while PARADEEP.NS trades at ₹144.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas PARADEEP.NS's P/E ratio is 16.31. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PARADEEP.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to PARADEEP.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check PARADEEP.NS's competition here
UPL.BO vs SHARDACROP.NS Comparison July 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 512.1B. In comparison, SHARDACROP.NS has a market cap of 82.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹606.45, while SHARDACROP.NS trades at ₹908.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas SHARDACROP.NS's P/E ratio is 11.75. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SHARDACROP.NS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to SHARDACROP.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check SHARDACROP.NS's competition here
UPL.BO vs SHARDACROP.BO Comparison July 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 512.1B. In comparison, SHARDACROP.BO has a market cap of 82.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹606.45, while SHARDACROP.BO trades at ₹910.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas SHARDACROP.BO's P/E ratio is 12.07. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SHARDACROP.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to SHARDACROP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check SHARDACROP.BO's competition here
UPL.BO vs RCF.BO Comparison July 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 512.1B. In comparison, RCF.BO has a market cap of 73.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹606.45, while RCF.BO trades at ₹133.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas RCF.BO's P/E ratio is 17.17. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RCF.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to RCF.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check RCF.BO's competition here
UPL.BO vs RCF.NS Comparison July 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 512.1B. In comparison, RCF.NS has a market cap of 73.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹606.45, while RCF.NS trades at ₹131.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas RCF.NS's P/E ratio is 16.48. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RCF.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to RCF.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check RCF.NS's competition here
UPL.BO vs GSFC.BO Comparison July 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 512.1B. In comparison, GSFC.BO has a market cap of 64.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹606.45, while GSFC.BO trades at ₹162.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas GSFC.BO's P/E ratio is 9.44. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GSFC.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to GSFC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check GSFC.BO's competition here
UPL.BO vs GSFC.NS Comparison July 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 512.1B. In comparison, GSFC.NS has a market cap of 64.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹606.45, while GSFC.NS trades at ₹161.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas GSFC.NS's P/E ratio is 14.92. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GSFC.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to GSFC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check GSFC.NS's competition here
UPL.BO vs PICCADIL.BO Comparison July 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 512.1B. In comparison, PICCADIL.BO has a market cap of 63.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹606.45, while PICCADIL.BO trades at ₹646.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas PICCADIL.BO's P/E ratio is 137.77. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PICCADIL.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is less volatile compared to PICCADIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check PICCADIL.BO's competition here
UPL.BO vs MBAPL.NS Comparison July 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 512.1B. In comparison, MBAPL.NS has a market cap of 54.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹606.45, while MBAPL.NS trades at ₹118.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas MBAPL.NS's P/E ratio is 7.30. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MBAPL.NS's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is less volatile compared to MBAPL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check MBAPL.NS's competition here
UPL.BO vs DHANUKA.BO Comparison July 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 512.1B. In comparison, DHANUKA.BO has a market cap of 49.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹606.45, while DHANUKA.BO trades at ₹1,092.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas DHANUKA.BO's P/E ratio is 17.14. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DHANUKA.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to DHANUKA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check DHANUKA.BO's competition here
UPL.BO vs DHANUKA.NS Comparison July 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 512.1B. In comparison, DHANUKA.NS has a market cap of 49.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹606.45, while DHANUKA.NS trades at ₹1,082.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas DHANUKA.NS's P/E ratio is 16.03. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DHANUKA.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to DHANUKA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check DHANUKA.NS's competition here
UPL.BO vs KSCL.NS Comparison July 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 512.1B. In comparison, KSCL.NS has a market cap of 47.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹606.45, while KSCL.NS trades at ₹915.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas KSCL.NS's P/E ratio is 15.86. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KSCL.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to KSCL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check KSCL.NS's competition here
UPL.BO vs KSCL.BO Comparison July 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 512.1B. In comparison, KSCL.BO has a market cap of 47.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹606.45, while KSCL.BO trades at ₹917.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas KSCL.BO's P/E ratio is 15.83. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KSCL.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to KSCL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check KSCL.BO's competition here
UPL.BO vs KRISHANA.NS Comparison July 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 512.1B. In comparison, KRISHANA.NS has a market cap of 46.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹606.45, while KRISHANA.NS trades at ₹143.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas KRISHANA.NS's P/E ratio is 5.21. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KRISHANA.NS's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is less volatile compared to KRISHANA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check KRISHANA.NS's competition here
UPL.BO vs CIANAGRO.BO Comparison July 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 512.1B. In comparison, CIANAGRO.BO has a market cap of 45.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹606.45, while CIANAGRO.BO trades at ₹1,622.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas CIANAGRO.BO's P/E ratio is 50.84. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CIANAGRO.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is less volatile compared to CIANAGRO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check CIANAGRO.BO's competition here
UPL.BO vs RALLIS.BO Comparison July 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 512.1B. In comparison, RALLIS.BO has a market cap of 44.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹606.45, while RALLIS.BO trades at ₹228.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas RALLIS.BO's P/E ratio is 21.35. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RALLIS.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to RALLIS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check RALLIS.BO's competition here
UPL.BO vs RALLIS.NS Comparison July 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 512.1B. In comparison, RALLIS.NS has a market cap of 44.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹606.45, while RALLIS.NS trades at ₹229.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas RALLIS.NS's P/E ratio is 61.00. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RALLIS.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to RALLIS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check RALLIS.NS's competition here
UPL.BO vs NACLIND.BO Comparison July 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 512.1B. In comparison, NACLIND.BO has a market cap of 42.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹606.45, while NACLIND.BO trades at ₹218.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas NACLIND.BO's P/E ratio is 820.33. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NACLIND.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is less volatile compared to NACLIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check NACLIND.BO's competition here
UPL.BO vs NACLIND.NS Comparison July 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 512.1B. In comparison, NACLIND.NS has a market cap of 42.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹606.45, while NACLIND.NS trades at ₹215.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas NACLIND.NS's P/E ratio is -75.44. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NACLIND.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to NACLIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check NACLIND.NS's competition here
UPL.BO vs NFL.NS Comparison July 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 512.1B. In comparison, NFL.NS has a market cap of 37.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹606.45, while NFL.NS trades at ₹75.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas NFL.NS's P/E ratio is 9.62. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NFL.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to NFL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check NFL.NS's competition here
UPL.BO vs NFL.BO Comparison July 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 512.1B. In comparison, NFL.BO has a market cap of 37.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹606.45, while NFL.BO trades at ₹75.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas NFL.BO's P/E ratio is 17.49. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NFL.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to NFL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check NFL.BO's competition here
UPL.BO vs BHAGCHEM.NS Comparison July 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 512.1B. In comparison, BHAGCHEM.NS has a market cap of 36.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹606.45, while BHAGCHEM.NS trades at ₹283.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas BHAGCHEM.NS's P/E ratio is 200.99. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BHAGCHEM.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to BHAGCHEM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check BHAGCHEM.NS's competition here
UPL.BO vs MANGCHEFER.NS Comparison July 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 512.1B. In comparison, MANGCHEFER.NS has a market cap of 36.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹606.45, while MANGCHEFER.NS trades at ₹308.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas MANGCHEFER.NS's P/E ratio is 22.67. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MANGCHEFER.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to MANGCHEFER.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check MANGCHEFER.NS's competition here
UPL.BO vs MANGCHEFER.BO Comparison July 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 512.1B. In comparison, MANGCHEFER.BO has a market cap of 36.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹606.45, while MANGCHEFER.BO trades at ₹308.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas MANGCHEFER.BO's P/E ratio is 22.63. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MANGCHEFER.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to MANGCHEFER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check MANGCHEFER.BO's competition here
UPL.BO vs BHAGCHEM.BO Comparison July 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 512.1B. In comparison, BHAGCHEM.BO has a market cap of 36.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹606.45, while BHAGCHEM.BO trades at ₹284.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas BHAGCHEM.BO's P/E ratio is 201.84. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BHAGCHEM.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to BHAGCHEM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check BHAGCHEM.BO's competition here
UPL.BO vs BNHOLDINGS.BO Comparison July 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 512.1B. In comparison, BNHOLDINGS.BO has a market cap of 34.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹606.45, while BNHOLDINGS.BO trades at ₹355.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas BNHOLDINGS.BO's P/E ratio is 26.71. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BNHOLDINGS.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is less volatile compared to BNHOLDINGS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check BNHOLDINGS.BO's competition here
UPL.BO vs JUBLCPL.BO Comparison July 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 512.1B. In comparison, JUBLCPL.BO has a market cap of 33.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹606.45, while JUBLCPL.BO trades at ₹2,192.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas JUBLCPL.BO's P/E ratio is 101.21. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to JUBLCPL.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is less volatile compared to JUBLCPL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check JUBLCPL.BO's competition here
UPL.BO vs VENKYS.BO Comparison July 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 512.1B. In comparison, VENKYS.BO has a market cap of 24.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹606.45, while VENKYS.BO trades at ₹1,714.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas VENKYS.BO's P/E ratio is -57.49. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VENKYS.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is less volatile compared to VENKYS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check VENKYS.BO's competition here
UPL.BO vs KSE.NS Comparison July 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 512.1B. In comparison, KSE.NS has a market cap of 22.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹606.45, while KSE.NS trades at ₹697.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas KSE.NS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KSE.NS's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to KSE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check KSE.NS's competition here
UPL.BO vs INSECTICID.NS Comparison July 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 512.1B. In comparison, INSECTICID.NS has a market cap of 19.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹606.45, while INSECTICID.NS trades at ₹661.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas INSECTICID.NS's P/E ratio is 19.95. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to INSECTICID.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to INSECTICID.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check INSECTICID.NS's competition here
UPL.BO vs INSECTICID.BO Comparison July 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 512.1B. In comparison, INSECTICID.BO has a market cap of 19.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹606.45, while INSECTICID.BO trades at ₹663.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas INSECTICID.BO's P/E ratio is 13.59. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to INSECTICID.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to INSECTICID.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check INSECTICID.BO's competition here
UPL.BO vs IPL.BO Comparison July 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 512.1B. In comparison, IPL.BO has a market cap of 18.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹606.45, while IPL.BO trades at ₹163.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas IPL.BO's P/E ratio is 15.74. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IPL.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to IPL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check IPL.BO's competition here
UPL.BO vs IPL.NS Comparison July 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 512.1B. In comparison, IPL.NS has a market cap of 18.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹606.45, while IPL.NS trades at ₹165.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas IPL.NS's P/E ratio is 15.76. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IPL.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to IPL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check IPL.NS's competition here
UPL.BO vs ASTEC.BO Comparison July 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 512.1B. In comparison, ASTEC.BO has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹606.45, while ASTEC.BO trades at ₹712.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas ASTEC.BO's P/E ratio is -18.49. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ASTEC.BO's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to ASTEC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check ASTEC.BO's competition here
UPL.BO vs ASTEC.NS Comparison July 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 512.1B. In comparison, ASTEC.NS has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹606.45, while ASTEC.NS trades at ₹710.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas ASTEC.NS's P/E ratio is -14.91. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ASTEC.NS's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to ASTEC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check ASTEC.NS's competition here
UPL.BO vs SPIC.NS Comparison July 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 512.1B. In comparison, SPIC.NS has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹606.45, while SPIC.NS trades at ₹69.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas SPIC.NS's P/E ratio is 6.74. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SPIC.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to SPIC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check SPIC.NS's competition here
UPL.BO vs SPIC.BO Comparison July 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 512.1B. In comparison, SPIC.BO has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹606.45, while SPIC.BO trades at ₹70.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas SPIC.BO's P/E ratio is 6.74. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SPIC.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to SPIC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check SPIC.BO's competition here
UPL.BO vs PUNJABCHEM.BO Comparison July 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 512.1B. In comparison, PUNJABCHEM.BO has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹606.45, while PUNJABCHEM.BO trades at ₹1,075.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas PUNJABCHEM.BO's P/E ratio is 20.62. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PUNJABCHEM.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is less volatile compared to PUNJABCHEM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check PUNJABCHEM.BO's competition here
UPL.BO vs PUNJABCHEM.NS Comparison July 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 512.1B. In comparison, PUNJABCHEM.NS has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹606.45, while PUNJABCHEM.NS trades at ₹1,070.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas PUNJABCHEM.NS's P/E ratio is 20.67. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PUNJABCHEM.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to PUNJABCHEM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check PUNJABCHEM.NS's competition here
UPL.BO vs MOL.NS Comparison July 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 512.1B. In comparison, MOL.NS has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹606.45, while MOL.NS trades at ₹47.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas MOL.NS's P/E ratio is 29.96. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MOL.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to MOL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check MOL.NS's competition here
UPL.BO vs MADRASFERT.BO Comparison July 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 512.1B. In comparison, MADRASFERT.BO has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹606.45, while MADRASFERT.BO trades at ₹69.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas MADRASFERT.BO's P/E ratio is 13.96. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MADRASFERT.BO's ROE of +6.18%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to MADRASFERT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check MADRASFERT.BO's competition here
UPL.BO vs MADRASFERT.NS Comparison July 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 512.1B. In comparison, MADRASFERT.NS has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹606.45, while MADRASFERT.NS trades at ₹70.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas MADRASFERT.NS's P/E ratio is -70.80. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MADRASFERT.NS's ROE of +6.18%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to MADRASFERT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check MADRASFERT.NS's competition here
UPL.BO vs BHARATRAS.BO Comparison July 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 512.1B. In comparison, BHARATRAS.BO has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹606.45, while BHARATRAS.BO trades at ₹1,344.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas BHARATRAS.BO's P/E ratio is 10.48. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BHARATRAS.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to BHARATRAS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check BHARATRAS.BO's competition here
UPL.BO vs BHARATRAS.NS Comparison July 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 512.1B. In comparison, BHARATRAS.NS has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹606.45, while BHARATRAS.NS trades at ₹1,339.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas BHARATRAS.NS's P/E ratio is 8.29. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BHARATRAS.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to BHARATRAS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check BHARATRAS.NS's competition here
UPL.BO vs ZUARI.BO Comparison July 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 512.1B. In comparison, ZUARI.BO has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹606.45, while ZUARI.BO trades at ₹241.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas ZUARI.BO's P/E ratio is 1.10. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ZUARI.BO's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is less volatile compared to ZUARI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check ZUARI.BO's competition here
UPL.BO vs ZUARI.NS Comparison July 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 512.1B. In comparison, ZUARI.NS has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹606.45, while ZUARI.NS trades at ₹241.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas ZUARI.NS's P/E ratio is 1.10. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ZUARI.NS's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to ZUARI.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check ZUARI.NS's competition here
UPL.BO vs BLUECLOUDS.BO Comparison July 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 512.1B. In comparison, BLUECLOUDS.BO has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹606.45, while BLUECLOUDS.BO trades at ₹21.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas BLUECLOUDS.BO's P/E ratio is 18.98. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BLUECLOUDS.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is less volatile compared to BLUECLOUDS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check BLUECLOUDS.BO's competition here
UPL.BO vs BSHSL.NS Comparison July 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 512.1B. In comparison, BSHSL.NS has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹606.45, while BSHSL.NS trades at ₹91.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas BSHSL.NS's P/E ratio is 35.21. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BSHSL.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is less volatile compared to BSHSL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check BSHSL.NS's competition here
UPL.BO vs DHARMAJ.NS Comparison July 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 512.1B. In comparison, DHARMAJ.NS has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹606.45, while DHARMAJ.NS trades at ₹261.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas DHARMAJ.NS's P/E ratio is 53.38. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DHARMAJ.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to DHARMAJ.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check DHARMAJ.NS's competition here
UPL.BO vs DHARMAJ.BO Comparison July 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 512.1B. In comparison, DHARMAJ.BO has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹606.45, while DHARMAJ.BO trades at ₹260.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas DHARMAJ.BO's P/E ratio is 150.58. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DHARMAJ.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is less volatile compared to DHARMAJ.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check DHARMAJ.BO's competition here
UPL.BO vs BAJAJST.BO Comparison July 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 512.1B. In comparison, BAJAJST.BO has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹606.45, while BAJAJST.BO trades at ₹412.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas BAJAJST.BO's P/E ratio is 15.10. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BAJAJST.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is less volatile compared to BAJAJST.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check BAJAJST.BO's competition here
UPL.BO vs HERANBA.BO Comparison July 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 512.1B. In comparison, HERANBA.BO has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹606.45, while HERANBA.BO trades at ₹188.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas HERANBA.BO's P/E ratio is -12.69. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HERANBA.BO's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to HERANBA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check HERANBA.BO's competition here
UPL.BO vs HERANBA.NS Comparison July 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 512.1B. In comparison, HERANBA.NS has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹606.45, while HERANBA.NS trades at ₹186.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas HERANBA.NS's P/E ratio is -12.55. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HERANBA.NS's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to HERANBA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check HERANBA.NS's competition here
UPL.BO vs SVRL.BO Comparison July 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 512.1B. In comparison, SVRL.BO has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹606.45, while SVRL.BO trades at ₹324.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas SVRL.BO's P/E ratio is 172.34. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SVRL.BO's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to SVRL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check SVRL.BO's competition here
UPL.BO vs KSE.BO Comparison July 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 512.1B. In comparison, KSE.BO has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹606.45, while KSE.BO trades at ₹182.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas KSE.BO's P/E ratio is 20.27. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KSE.BO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to KSE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check KSE.BO's competition here
UPL.BO vs MODINATUR.BO Comparison July 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 512.1B. In comparison, MODINATUR.BO has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹606.45, while MODINATUR.BO trades at ₹436.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas MODINATUR.BO's P/E ratio is 24.64. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MODINATUR.BO's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is less volatile compared to MODINATUR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check MODINATUR.BO's competition here
UPL.BO vs SHINDL.BO Comparison July 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 512.1B. In comparison, SHINDL.BO has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹606.45, while SHINDL.BO trades at ₹145.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas SHINDL.BO's P/E ratio is 96.27. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SHINDL.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is less volatile compared to SHINDL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check SHINDL.BO's competition here
UPL.BO vs BESTAGRO.NS Comparison July 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 512.1B. In comparison, BESTAGRO.NS has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹606.45, while BESTAGRO.NS trades at ₹15.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas BESTAGRO.NS's P/E ratio is -10.86. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BESTAGRO.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to BESTAGRO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check BESTAGRO.NS's competition here
UPL.BO vs BESTAGRO.BO Comparison July 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 512.1B. In comparison, BESTAGRO.BO has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹606.45, while BESTAGRO.BO trades at ₹15.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas BESTAGRO.BO's P/E ratio is -10.87. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BESTAGRO.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to BESTAGRO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check BESTAGRO.BO's competition here
UPL.BO vs KHAICHEM.BO Comparison July 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 512.1B. In comparison, KHAICHEM.BO has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹606.45, while KHAICHEM.BO trades at ₹53.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas KHAICHEM.BO's P/E ratio is 8.06. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KHAICHEM.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to KHAICHEM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check KHAICHEM.BO's competition here
UPL.BO vs KHAICHEM.NS Comparison July 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 512.1B. In comparison, KHAICHEM.NS has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹606.45, while KHAICHEM.NS trades at ₹54.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas KHAICHEM.NS's P/E ratio is 7.98. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KHAICHEM.NS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to KHAICHEM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check KHAICHEM.NS's competition here
UPL.BO vs RAMAPHO.BO Comparison July 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 512.1B. In comparison, RAMAPHO.BO has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹606.45, while RAMAPHO.BO trades at ₹129.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas RAMAPHO.BO's P/E ratio is 8.72. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RAMAPHO.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is less volatile compared to RAMAPHO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check RAMAPHO.BO's competition here
UPL.BO vs RAMAPHO.NS Comparison July 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 512.1B. In comparison, RAMAPHO.NS has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹606.45, while RAMAPHO.NS trades at ₹128.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas RAMAPHO.NS's P/E ratio is 10.92. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RAMAPHO.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to RAMAPHO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check RAMAPHO.NS's competition here
UPL.BO vs ARIES.NS Comparison July 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 512.1B. In comparison, ARIES.NS has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹606.45, while ARIES.NS trades at ₹341.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas ARIES.NS's P/E ratio is 10.43. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ARIES.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to ARIES.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check ARIES.NS's competition here
UPL.BO vs ARIES.BO Comparison July 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 512.1B. In comparison, ARIES.BO has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹606.45, while ARIES.BO trades at ₹341.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas ARIES.BO's P/E ratio is 10.37. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ARIES.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to ARIES.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check ARIES.BO's competition here
UPL.BO vs IGCL.NS Comparison July 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 512.1B. In comparison, IGCL.NS has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹606.45, while IGCL.NS trades at ₹69.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas IGCL.NS's P/E ratio is 10.39. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IGCL.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to IGCL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check IGCL.NS's competition here
UPL.BO vs MISHTANN.BO Comparison July 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 512.1B. In comparison, MISHTANN.BO has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹606.45, while MISHTANN.BO trades at ₹3.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas MISHTANN.BO's P/E ratio is 2.37. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MISHTANN.BO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to MISHTANN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check MISHTANN.BO's competition here
UPL.BO vs GOODRICKE.BO Comparison July 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 512.1B. In comparison, GOODRICKE.BO has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹606.45, while GOODRICKE.BO trades at ₹184.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas GOODRICKE.BO's P/E ratio is -5.66. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GOODRICKE.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to GOODRICKE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check GOODRICKE.BO's competition here
UPL.BO vs DCMSRIND.NS Comparison July 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 512.1B. In comparison, DCMSRIND.NS has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹606.45, while DCMSRIND.NS trades at ₹39.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas DCMSRIND.NS's P/E ratio is 6.99. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DCMSRIND.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to DCMSRIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check DCMSRIND.NS's competition here
UPL.BO vs SBECSUG.BO Comparison July 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 512.1B. In comparison, SBECSUG.BO has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹606.45, while SBECSUG.BO trades at ₹68.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas SBECSUG.BO's P/E ratio is -11.56. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SBECSUG.BO's ROE of -1.29%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is less volatile compared to SBECSUG.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check SBECSUG.BO's competition here
UPL.BO vs NATHBIOGEN.BO Comparison July 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 512.1B. In comparison, NATHBIOGEN.BO has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹606.45, while NATHBIOGEN.BO trades at ₹168.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas NATHBIOGEN.BO's P/E ratio is 7.99. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NATHBIOGEN.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to NATHBIOGEN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check NATHBIOGEN.BO's competition here
UPL.BO vs NATHBIOGEN.NS Comparison July 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 512.1B. In comparison, NATHBIOGEN.NS has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹606.45, while NATHBIOGEN.NS trades at ₹167.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas NATHBIOGEN.NS's P/E ratio is 45.91. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NATHBIOGEN.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to NATHBIOGEN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check NATHBIOGEN.NS's competition here
UPL.BO vs HOACFOODS.NS Comparison July 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 512.1B. In comparison, HOACFOODS.NS has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹606.45, while HOACFOODS.NS trades at ₹680.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas HOACFOODS.NS's P/E ratio is 100.45. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HOACFOODS.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to HOACFOODS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check HOACFOODS.NS's competition here
UPL.BO vs VIJSOLX.BO Comparison July 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 512.1B. In comparison, VIJSOLX.BO has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹606.45, while VIJSOLX.BO trades at ₹780.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas VIJSOLX.BO's P/E ratio is 150.73. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VIJSOLX.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is less volatile compared to VIJSOLX.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check VIJSOLX.BO's competition here
UPL.BO vs NOVAAGRI.NS Comparison July 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 512.1B. In comparison, NOVAAGRI.NS has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹606.45, while NOVAAGRI.NS trades at ₹26.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas NOVAAGRI.NS's P/E ratio is 18.08. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NOVAAGRI.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to NOVAAGRI.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check NOVAAGRI.NS's competition here
UPL.BO vs EQUIPPP.NS Comparison July 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 512.1B. In comparison, EQUIPPP.NS has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹606.45, while EQUIPPP.NS trades at ₹21.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas EQUIPPP.NS's P/E ratio is 137.88. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EQUIPPP.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to EQUIPPP.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check EQUIPPP.NS's competition here
UPL.BO vs EQUIPPP.BO Comparison July 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 512.1B. In comparison, EQUIPPP.BO has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹606.45, while EQUIPPP.BO trades at ₹21.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas EQUIPPP.BO's P/E ratio is 142.30. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EQUIPPP.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is less volatile compared to EQUIPPP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check EQUIPPP.BO's competition here
UPL.BO vs NAGAFERT.NS Comparison July 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 512.1B. In comparison, NAGAFERT.NS has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹606.45, while NAGAFERT.NS trades at ₹3.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas NAGAFERT.NS's P/E ratio is -6.88. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NAGAFERT.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to NAGAFERT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check NAGAFERT.NS's competition here
UPL.BO vs NAGAFERT.BO Comparison July 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 512.1B. In comparison, NAGAFERT.BO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹606.45, while NAGAFERT.BO trades at ₹3.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas NAGAFERT.BO's P/E ratio is -6.89. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NAGAFERT.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to NAGAFERT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check NAGAFERT.BO's competition here
UPL.BO vs RBS.NS Comparison July 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 512.1B. In comparison, RBS.NS has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹606.45, while RBS.NS trades at ₹80.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas RBS.NS's P/E ratio is 11.66. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RBS.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to RBS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check RBS.NS's competition here
UPL.BO vs INDOUS.NS Comparison July 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 512.1B. In comparison, INDOUS.NS has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹606.45, while INDOUS.NS trades at ₹90.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas INDOUS.NS's P/E ratio is 13.63. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to INDOUS.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to INDOUS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check INDOUS.NS's competition here
UPL.BO vs INDOUS.BO Comparison July 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 512.1B. In comparison, INDOUS.BO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹606.45, while INDOUS.BO trades at ₹88.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas INDOUS.BO's P/E ratio is 13.56. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to INDOUS.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to INDOUS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check INDOUS.BO's competition here