UPL Limited
UPL Limited (UPL.BO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (UPL.BO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Agricultural Inputs Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UPL.BO | ₹638.55 | +0.96% | 539B | 28.62 | ₹22.31 | +0.95% |
| FACT.BO | ₹866.10 | -1.79% | 560.4B | 1968.41 | ₹0.44 | +0.04% |
| FACT.NS | ₹865.65 | -1.93% | 560.1B | 1967.39 | ₹0.44 | +0.04% |
| COROMANDEL.BO | ₹1,838.70 | -1.41% | 541.9B | 27.75 | ₹66.26 | +0.96% |
| COROMANDEL.NS | ₹1,837.20 | -1.53% | 541.5B | 27.74 | ₹66.24 | +0.96% |
| UPL.NS | ₹637.85 | +0.89% | 538.5B | 28.58 | ₹22.32 | +0.95% |
| PIIND.BO | ₹3,096.60 | -0.72% | 469.8B | 32.40 | ₹95.56 | +0.48% |
| PIIND.NS | ₹3,096.30 | -0.60% | 469.7B | 32.38 | ₹95.63 | +0.48% |
| SUMICHEM.NS | ₹449.65 | -1.98% | 224.4B | 42.26 | ₹10.64 | +0.26% |
| SUMICHEM.BO | ₹449.65 | -1.87% | 224.4B | 42.30 | ₹10.63 | +0.26% |
Stock Comparison
UPL.BO vs FACT.BO Comparison May 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 539B. In comparison, FACT.BO has a market cap of 560.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹638.55, while FACT.BO trades at ₹866.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.62, whereas FACT.BO's P/E ratio is 1968.41. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FACT.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is less volatile compared to FACT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check FACT.BO's competition here
UPL.BO vs FACT.NS Comparison May 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 539B. In comparison, FACT.NS has a market cap of 560.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹638.55, while FACT.NS trades at ₹865.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.62, whereas FACT.NS's P/E ratio is 1967.39. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FACT.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is less volatile compared to FACT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check FACT.NS's competition here
UPL.BO vs COROMANDEL.BO Comparison May 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 539B. In comparison, COROMANDEL.BO has a market cap of 541.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹638.55, while COROMANDEL.BO trades at ₹1,838.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.62, whereas COROMANDEL.BO's P/E ratio is 27.75. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to COROMANDEL.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is less volatile compared to COROMANDEL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check COROMANDEL.BO's competition here
UPL.BO vs COROMANDEL.NS Comparison May 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 539B. In comparison, COROMANDEL.NS has a market cap of 541.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹638.55, while COROMANDEL.NS trades at ₹1,837.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.62, whereas COROMANDEL.NS's P/E ratio is 27.74. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to COROMANDEL.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is less volatile compared to COROMANDEL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check COROMANDEL.NS's competition here
UPL.BO vs UPL.NS Comparison May 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 539B. In comparison, UPL.NS has a market cap of 538.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹638.55, while UPL.NS trades at ₹637.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.62, whereas UPL.NS's P/E ratio is 28.58. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to UPL.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is less volatile compared to UPL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check UPL.NS's competition here
UPL.BO vs PIIND.BO Comparison May 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 539B. In comparison, PIIND.BO has a market cap of 469.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹638.55, while PIIND.BO trades at ₹3,096.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.62, whereas PIIND.BO's P/E ratio is 32.40. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PIIND.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to PIIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check PIIND.BO's competition here
UPL.BO vs PIIND.NS Comparison May 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 539B. In comparison, PIIND.NS has a market cap of 469.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹638.55, while PIIND.NS trades at ₹3,096.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.62, whereas PIIND.NS's P/E ratio is 32.38. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PIIND.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to PIIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check PIIND.NS's competition here
UPL.BO vs SUMICHEM.NS Comparison May 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 539B. In comparison, SUMICHEM.NS has a market cap of 224.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹638.55, while SUMICHEM.NS trades at ₹449.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.62, whereas SUMICHEM.NS's P/E ratio is 42.26. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SUMICHEM.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to SUMICHEM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check SUMICHEM.NS's competition here
UPL.BO vs SUMICHEM.BO Comparison May 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 539B. In comparison, SUMICHEM.BO has a market cap of 224.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹638.55, while SUMICHEM.BO trades at ₹449.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.62, whereas SUMICHEM.BO's P/E ratio is 42.30. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SUMICHEM.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to SUMICHEM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check SUMICHEM.BO's competition here
UPL.BO vs BAYERCROP.BO Comparison May 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 539B. In comparison, BAYERCROP.BO has a market cap of 193.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹638.55, while BAYERCROP.BO trades at ₹4,304.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.62, whereas BAYERCROP.BO's P/E ratio is 28.85. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BAYERCROP.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to BAYERCROP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check BAYERCROP.BO's competition here
UPL.BO vs BAYERCROP.NS Comparison May 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 539B. In comparison, BAYERCROP.NS has a market cap of 193.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹638.55, while BAYERCROP.NS trades at ₹4,300.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.62, whereas BAYERCROP.NS's P/E ratio is 28.82. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BAYERCROP.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to BAYERCROP.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check BAYERCROP.NS's competition here
UPL.BO vs CHAMBLFERT.NS Comparison May 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 539B. In comparison, CHAMBLFERT.NS has a market cap of 183.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹638.55, while CHAMBLFERT.NS trades at ₹457.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.62, whereas CHAMBLFERT.NS's P/E ratio is 9.38. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CHAMBLFERT.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is less volatile compared to CHAMBLFERT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check CHAMBLFERT.NS's competition here
UPL.BO vs CHAMBLFERT.BO Comparison May 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 539B. In comparison, CHAMBLFERT.BO has a market cap of 183.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹638.55, while CHAMBLFERT.BO trades at ₹457.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.62, whereas CHAMBLFERT.BO's P/E ratio is 9.84. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CHAMBLFERT.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is less volatile compared to CHAMBLFERT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check CHAMBLFERT.BO's competition here
UPL.BO vs ATUL7.BO Comparison May 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 539B. In comparison, ATUL7.BO has a market cap of 179B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹638.55, while ATUL7.BO trades at ₹7,100.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.62, whereas ATUL7.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ATUL7.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to ATUL7.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check ATUL7.BO's competition here
UPL.BO vs EIDPARRY.NS Comparison May 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 539B. In comparison, EIDPARRY.NS has a market cap of 138.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹638.55, while EIDPARRY.NS trades at ₹781.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.62, whereas EIDPARRY.NS's P/E ratio is 11.69. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EIDPARRY.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is less volatile compared to EIDPARRY.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check EIDPARRY.NS's competition here
UPL.BO vs EIDPARRY.BO Comparison May 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 539B. In comparison, EIDPARRY.BO has a market cap of 138.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹638.55, while EIDPARRY.BO trades at ₹780.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.62, whereas EIDPARRY.BO's P/E ratio is 12.07. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EIDPARRY.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is less volatile compared to EIDPARRY.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check EIDPARRY.BO's competition here
UPL.BO vs PARADEEP.BO Comparison May 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 539B. In comparison, PARADEEP.BO has a market cap of 98.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹638.55, while PARADEEP.BO trades at ₹121.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.62, whereas PARADEEP.BO's P/E ratio is 12.63. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PARADEEP.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is less volatile compared to PARADEEP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check PARADEEP.BO's competition here
UPL.BO vs PARADEEP.NS Comparison May 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 539B. In comparison, PARADEEP.NS has a market cap of 98.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹638.55, while PARADEEP.NS trades at ₹120.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.62, whereas PARADEEP.NS's P/E ratio is 12.61. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PARADEEP.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is less volatile compared to PARADEEP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check PARADEEP.NS's competition here
UPL.BO vs SHARDACROP.BO Comparison May 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 539B. In comparison, SHARDACROP.BO has a market cap of 81.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹638.55, while SHARDACROP.BO trades at ₹904.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.62, whereas SHARDACROP.BO's P/E ratio is 14.41. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SHARDACROP.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is less volatile compared to SHARDACROP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check SHARDACROP.BO's competition here
UPL.BO vs SHARDACROP.NS Comparison May 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 539B. In comparison, SHARDACROP.NS has a market cap of 81.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹638.55, while SHARDACROP.NS trades at ₹901.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.62, whereas SHARDACROP.NS's P/E ratio is 14.38. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SHARDACROP.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is less volatile compared to SHARDACROP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check SHARDACROP.NS's competition here
UPL.BO vs GSFC.NS Comparison May 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 539B. In comparison, GSFC.NS has a market cap of 67.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹638.55, while GSFC.NS trades at ₹169.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.62, whereas GSFC.NS's P/E ratio is 9.75. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GSFC.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to GSFC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check GSFC.NS's competition here
UPL.BO vs GSFC.BO Comparison May 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 539B. In comparison, GSFC.BO has a market cap of 67.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹638.55, while GSFC.BO trades at ₹169.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.62, whereas GSFC.BO's P/E ratio is 10.09. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GSFC.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to GSFC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check GSFC.BO's competition here
UPL.BO vs RCF.BO Comparison May 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 539B. In comparison, RCF.BO has a market cap of 67.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹638.55, while RCF.BO trades at ₹121.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.62, whereas RCF.BO's P/E ratio is 21.48. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RCF.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to RCF.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check RCF.BO's competition here
UPL.BO vs RCF.NS Comparison May 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 539B. In comparison, RCF.NS has a market cap of 67.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹638.55, while RCF.NS trades at ₹121.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.62, whereas RCF.NS's P/E ratio is 21.46. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RCF.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to RCF.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check RCF.NS's competition here
UPL.BO vs PICCADIL.BO Comparison May 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 539B. In comparison, PICCADIL.BO has a market cap of 57.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹638.55, while PICCADIL.BO trades at ₹579.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.62, whereas PICCADIL.BO's P/E ratio is 40.72. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PICCADIL.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is less volatile compared to PICCADIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check PICCADIL.BO's competition here
UPL.BO vs RALLIS.NS Comparison May 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 539B. In comparison, RALLIS.NS has a market cap of 49.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹638.55, while RALLIS.NS trades at ₹255.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.62, whereas RALLIS.NS's P/E ratio is 26.99. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RALLIS.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to RALLIS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check RALLIS.NS's competition here
UPL.BO vs RALLIS.BO Comparison May 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 539B. In comparison, RALLIS.BO has a market cap of 49.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹638.55, while RALLIS.BO trades at ₹255.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.62, whereas RALLIS.BO's P/E ratio is 29.79. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RALLIS.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to RALLIS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check RALLIS.BO's competition here
UPL.BO vs DHANUKA.BO Comparison May 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 539B. In comparison, DHANUKA.BO has a market cap of 49B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹638.55, while DHANUKA.BO trades at ₹1,087.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.62, whereas DHANUKA.BO's P/E ratio is 6.95. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DHANUKA.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to DHANUKA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check DHANUKA.BO's competition here
UPL.BO vs DHANUKA.NS Comparison May 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 539B. In comparison, DHANUKA.NS has a market cap of 49B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹638.55, while DHANUKA.NS trades at ₹1,085.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.62, whereas DHANUKA.NS's P/E ratio is 6.95. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DHANUKA.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to DHANUKA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check DHANUKA.NS's competition here
UPL.BO vs KSCL.NS Comparison May 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 539B. In comparison, KSCL.NS has a market cap of 47.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹638.55, while KSCL.NS trades at ₹932.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.62, whereas KSCL.NS's P/E ratio is 15.81. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KSCL.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is less volatile compared to KSCL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check KSCL.NS's competition here
UPL.BO vs KSCL.BO Comparison May 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 539B. In comparison, KSCL.BO has a market cap of 47.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹638.55, while KSCL.BO trades at ₹931.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.62, whereas KSCL.BO's P/E ratio is 15.80. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KSCL.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is less volatile compared to KSCL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check KSCL.BO's competition here
UPL.BO vs MBAPL.NS Comparison May 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 539B. In comparison, MBAPL.NS has a market cap of 46.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹638.55, while MBAPL.NS trades at ₹526.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.62, whereas MBAPL.NS's P/E ratio is 44.06. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MBAPL.NS's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to MBAPL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check MBAPL.NS's competition here
UPL.BO vs CIANAGRO.BO Comparison May 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 539B. In comparison, CIANAGRO.BO has a market cap of 42.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹638.55, while CIANAGRO.BO trades at ₹1,529.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.62, whereas CIANAGRO.BO's P/E ratio is 38.15. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CIANAGRO.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to CIANAGRO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check CIANAGRO.BO's competition here
UPL.BO vs KRISHANA.NS Comparison May 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 539B. In comparison, KRISHANA.NS has a market cap of 41.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹638.55, while KRISHANA.NS trades at ₹665.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.62, whereas KRISHANA.NS's P/E ratio is 22.84. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KRISHANA.NS's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to KRISHANA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check KRISHANA.NS's competition here
UPL.BO vs MANGCHEFER.NS Comparison May 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 539B. In comparison, MANGCHEFER.NS has a market cap of 36.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹638.55, while MANGCHEFER.NS trades at ₹308.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.62, whereas MANGCHEFER.NS's P/E ratio is 22.67. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MANGCHEFER.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is less volatile compared to MANGCHEFER.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check MANGCHEFER.NS's competition here
UPL.BO vs MANGCHEFER.BO Comparison May 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 539B. In comparison, MANGCHEFER.BO has a market cap of 36.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹638.55, while MANGCHEFER.BO trades at ₹308.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.62, whereas MANGCHEFER.BO's P/E ratio is 22.63. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MANGCHEFER.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to MANGCHEFER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check MANGCHEFER.BO's competition here
UPL.BO vs NFL.BO Comparison May 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 539B. In comparison, NFL.BO has a market cap of 36B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹638.55, while NFL.BO trades at ₹73.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.62, whereas NFL.BO's P/E ratio is 18.50. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NFL.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to NFL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check NFL.BO's competition here
UPL.BO vs NFL.NS Comparison May 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 539B. In comparison, NFL.NS has a market cap of 36B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹638.55, while NFL.NS trades at ₹73.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.62, whereas NFL.NS's P/E ratio is 18.49. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NFL.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to NFL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check NFL.NS's competition here
UPL.BO vs BNHOLDINGS.BO Comparison May 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 539B. In comparison, BNHOLDINGS.BO has a market cap of 34.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹638.55, while BNHOLDINGS.BO trades at ₹355.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.62, whereas BNHOLDINGS.BO's P/E ratio is 26.71. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BNHOLDINGS.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is less volatile compared to BNHOLDINGS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check BNHOLDINGS.BO's competition here
UPL.BO vs NACLIND.BO Comparison May 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 539B. In comparison, NACLIND.BO has a market cap of 31.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹638.55, while NACLIND.BO trades at ₹161.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.62, whereas NACLIND.BO's P/E ratio is 769.05. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NACLIND.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is less volatile compared to NACLIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check NACLIND.BO's competition here
UPL.BO vs NACLIND.NS Comparison May 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 539B. In comparison, NACLIND.NS has a market cap of 31.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹638.55, while NACLIND.NS trades at ₹161.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.62, whereas NACLIND.NS's P/E ratio is 767.19. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NACLIND.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is less volatile compared to NACLIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check NACLIND.NS's competition here
UPL.BO vs BHAGCHEM.NS Comparison May 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 539B. In comparison, BHAGCHEM.NS has a market cap of 31.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹638.55, while BHAGCHEM.NS trades at ₹242.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.62, whereas BHAGCHEM.NS's P/E ratio is 237.70. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BHAGCHEM.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is less volatile compared to BHAGCHEM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check BHAGCHEM.NS's competition here
UPL.BO vs BHAGCHEM.BO Comparison May 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 539B. In comparison, BHAGCHEM.BO has a market cap of 31B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹638.55, while BHAGCHEM.BO trades at ₹239.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.62, whereas BHAGCHEM.BO's P/E ratio is 237.03. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BHAGCHEM.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is less volatile compared to BHAGCHEM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check BHAGCHEM.BO's competition here
UPL.BO vs VENKYS.BO Comparison May 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 539B. In comparison, VENKYS.BO has a market cap of 24.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹638.55, while VENKYS.BO trades at ₹1,714.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.62, whereas VENKYS.BO's P/E ratio is -57.49. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VENKYS.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is less volatile compared to VENKYS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check VENKYS.BO's competition here
UPL.BO vs KSE.NS Comparison May 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 539B. In comparison, KSE.NS has a market cap of 22.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹638.55, while KSE.NS trades at ₹697.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.62, whereas KSE.NS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KSE.NS's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to KSE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check KSE.NS's competition here
UPL.BO vs INSECTICID.NS Comparison May 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 539B. In comparison, INSECTICID.NS has a market cap of 21B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹638.55, while INSECTICID.NS trades at ₹722.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.62, whereas INSECTICID.NS's P/E ratio is 14.82. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to INSECTICID.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to INSECTICID.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check INSECTICID.NS's competition here
UPL.BO vs INSECTICID.BO Comparison May 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 539B. In comparison, INSECTICID.BO has a market cap of 21B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹638.55, while INSECTICID.BO trades at ₹721.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.62, whereas INSECTICID.BO's P/E ratio is 14.80. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to INSECTICID.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to INSECTICID.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check INSECTICID.BO's competition here
UPL.BO vs IPL.BO Comparison May 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 539B. In comparison, IPL.BO has a market cap of 18.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹638.55, while IPL.BO trades at ₹164.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.62, whereas IPL.BO's P/E ratio is 17.29. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IPL.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is less volatile compared to IPL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check IPL.BO's competition here
UPL.BO vs IPL.NS Comparison May 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 539B. In comparison, IPL.NS has a market cap of 18.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹638.55, while IPL.NS trades at ₹164.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.62, whereas IPL.NS's P/E ratio is 17.25. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IPL.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is less volatile compared to IPL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check IPL.NS's competition here
UPL.BO vs ASTEC.NS Comparison May 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 539B. In comparison, ASTEC.NS has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹638.55, while ASTEC.NS trades at ₹754.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.62, whereas ASTEC.NS's P/E ratio is -19.98. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ASTEC.NS's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is less volatile compared to ASTEC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check ASTEC.NS's competition here
UPL.BO vs ASTEC.BO Comparison May 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 539B. In comparison, ASTEC.BO has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹638.55, while ASTEC.BO trades at ₹750.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.62, whereas ASTEC.BO's P/E ratio is -19.87. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ASTEC.BO's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is less volatile compared to ASTEC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check ASTEC.BO's competition here
UPL.BO vs SPIC.BO Comparison May 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 539B. In comparison, SPIC.BO has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹638.55, while SPIC.BO trades at ₹67.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.62, whereas SPIC.BO's P/E ratio is 7.45. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SPIC.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is less volatile compared to SPIC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check SPIC.BO's competition here
UPL.BO vs SPIC.NS Comparison May 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 539B. In comparison, SPIC.NS has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹638.55, while SPIC.NS trades at ₹67.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.62, whereas SPIC.NS's P/E ratio is 6.85. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SPIC.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is less volatile compared to SPIC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check SPIC.NS's competition here
UPL.BO vs MOL.BO Comparison May 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 539B. In comparison, MOL.BO has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹638.55, while MOL.BO trades at ₹49.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.62, whereas MOL.BO's P/E ratio is 31.06. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MOL.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is less volatile compared to MOL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check MOL.BO's competition here
UPL.BO vs MOL.NS Comparison May 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 539B. In comparison, MOL.NS has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹638.55, while MOL.NS trades at ₹49.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.62, whereas MOL.NS's P/E ratio is 31.03. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MOL.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is less volatile compared to MOL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check MOL.NS's competition here
UPL.BO vs BHARATRAS.NS Comparison May 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 539B. In comparison, BHARATRAS.NS has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹638.55, while BHARATRAS.NS trades at ₹1,382.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.62, whereas BHARATRAS.NS's P/E ratio is 17.33. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BHARATRAS.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is less volatile compared to BHARATRAS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check BHARATRAS.NS's competition here
UPL.BO vs BHARATRAS.BO Comparison May 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 539B. In comparison, BHARATRAS.BO has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹638.55, while BHARATRAS.BO trades at ₹1,379.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.62, whereas BHARATRAS.BO's P/E ratio is 17.19. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BHARATRAS.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is less volatile compared to BHARATRAS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check BHARATRAS.BO's competition here
UPL.BO vs MADRASFERT.BO Comparison May 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 539B. In comparison, MADRASFERT.BO has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹638.55, while MADRASFERT.BO trades at ₹64.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.62, whereas MADRASFERT.BO's P/E ratio is 143.53. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MADRASFERT.BO's ROE of +6.18%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is less volatile compared to MADRASFERT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check MADRASFERT.BO's competition here
UPL.BO vs MADRASFERT.NS Comparison May 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 539B. In comparison, MADRASFERT.NS has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹638.55, while MADRASFERT.NS trades at ₹64.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.62, whereas MADRASFERT.NS's P/E ratio is 143.51. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MADRASFERT.NS's ROE of +6.18%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is less volatile compared to MADRASFERT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check MADRASFERT.NS's competition here
UPL.BO vs BSHSL.NS Comparison May 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 539B. In comparison, BSHSL.NS has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹638.55, while BSHSL.NS trades at ₹96.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.62, whereas BSHSL.NS's P/E ratio is 36.04. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BSHSL.NS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is less volatile compared to BSHSL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check BSHSL.NS's competition here
UPL.BO vs ZUARI.BO Comparison May 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 539B. In comparison, ZUARI.BO has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹638.55, while ZUARI.BO trades at ₹214.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.62, whereas ZUARI.BO's P/E ratio is 0.93. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ZUARI.BO's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is less volatile compared to ZUARI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check ZUARI.BO's competition here
UPL.BO vs ZUARI.NS Comparison May 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 539B. In comparison, ZUARI.NS has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹638.55, while ZUARI.NS trades at ₹214.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.62, whereas ZUARI.NS's P/E ratio is 0.93. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ZUARI.NS's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is less volatile compared to ZUARI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check ZUARI.NS's competition here
UPL.BO vs DHARMAJ.NS Comparison May 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 539B. In comparison, DHARMAJ.NS has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹638.55, while DHARMAJ.NS trades at ₹265.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.62, whereas DHARMAJ.NS's P/E ratio is 18.63. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DHARMAJ.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to DHARMAJ.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check DHARMAJ.NS's competition here
UPL.BO vs DHARMAJ.BO Comparison May 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 539B. In comparison, DHARMAJ.BO has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹638.55, while DHARMAJ.BO trades at ₹264.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.62, whereas DHARMAJ.BO's P/E ratio is 18.53. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DHARMAJ.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to DHARMAJ.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check DHARMAJ.BO's competition here
UPL.BO vs BAJAJST.BO Comparison May 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 539B. In comparison, BAJAJST.BO has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹638.55, while BAJAJST.BO trades at ₹400.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.62, whereas BAJAJST.BO's P/E ratio is 15.96. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BAJAJST.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is less volatile compared to BAJAJST.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check BAJAJST.BO's competition here
UPL.BO vs BLUECLOUDS.BO Comparison May 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 539B. In comparison, BLUECLOUDS.BO has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹638.55, while BLUECLOUDS.BO trades at ₹17.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.62, whereas BLUECLOUDS.BO's P/E ratio is 13.08. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BLUECLOUDS.BO's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is less volatile compared to BLUECLOUDS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check BLUECLOUDS.BO's competition here
UPL.BO vs HERANBA.BO Comparison May 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 539B. In comparison, HERANBA.BO has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹638.55, while HERANBA.BO trades at ₹196.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.62, whereas HERANBA.BO's P/E ratio is -13.11. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HERANBA.BO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is less volatile compared to HERANBA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check HERANBA.BO's competition here
UPL.BO vs HERANBA.NS Comparison May 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 539B. In comparison, HERANBA.NS has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹638.55, while HERANBA.NS trades at ₹196.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.62, whereas HERANBA.NS's P/E ratio is -13.10. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HERANBA.NS's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is less volatile compared to HERANBA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check HERANBA.NS's competition here
UPL.BO vs KSE.BO Comparison May 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 539B. In comparison, KSE.BO has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹638.55, while KSE.BO trades at ₹208.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.62, whereas KSE.BO's P/E ratio is 5.45. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KSE.BO's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is less volatile compared to KSE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check KSE.BO's competition here
UPL.BO vs SHINDL.BO Comparison May 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 539B. In comparison, SHINDL.BO has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹638.55, while SHINDL.BO trades at ₹151.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.62, whereas SHINDL.BO's P/E ratio is 48.17. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SHINDL.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is less volatile compared to SHINDL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check SHINDL.BO's competition here
UPL.BO vs BESTAGRO.BO Comparison May 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 539B. In comparison, BESTAGRO.BO has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹638.55, while BESTAGRO.BO trades at ₹16.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.62, whereas BESTAGRO.BO's P/E ratio is 8.79. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BESTAGRO.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is less volatile compared to BESTAGRO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check BESTAGRO.BO's competition here
UPL.BO vs BESTAGRO.NS Comparison May 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 539B. In comparison, BESTAGRO.NS has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹638.55, while BESTAGRO.NS trades at ₹16.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.62, whereas BESTAGRO.NS's P/E ratio is 8.73. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BESTAGRO.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is less volatile compared to BESTAGRO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check BESTAGRO.NS's competition here
UPL.BO vs SVRL.BO Comparison May 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 539B. In comparison, SVRL.BO has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹638.55, while SVRL.BO trades at ₹254.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.62, whereas SVRL.BO's P/E ratio is 22.31. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SVRL.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to SVRL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check SVRL.BO's competition here
UPL.BO vs MODINATUR.BO Comparison May 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 539B. In comparison, MODINATUR.BO has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹638.55, while MODINATUR.BO trades at ₹418.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.62, whereas MODINATUR.BO's P/E ratio is 14.36. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MODINATUR.BO's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is less volatile compared to MODINATUR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check MODINATUR.BO's competition here
UPL.BO vs KHAICHEM.BO Comparison May 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 539B. In comparison, KHAICHEM.BO has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹638.55, while KHAICHEM.BO trades at ₹55.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.62, whereas KHAICHEM.BO's P/E ratio is 7.76. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KHAICHEM.BO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is less volatile compared to KHAICHEM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check KHAICHEM.BO's competition here
UPL.BO vs KHAICHEM.NS Comparison May 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 539B. In comparison, KHAICHEM.NS has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹638.55, while KHAICHEM.NS trades at ₹54.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.62, whereas KHAICHEM.NS's P/E ratio is 7.72. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KHAICHEM.NS's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is less volatile compared to KHAICHEM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check KHAICHEM.NS's competition here
UPL.BO vs KNAGRI.NS Comparison May 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 539B. In comparison, KNAGRI.NS has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹638.55, while KNAGRI.NS trades at ₹194.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.62, whereas KNAGRI.NS's P/E ratio is 13.22. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KNAGRI.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to KNAGRI.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check KNAGRI.NS's competition here
UPL.BO vs ARIES.NS Comparison May 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 539B. In comparison, ARIES.NS has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹638.55, while ARIES.NS trades at ₹357.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.62, whereas ARIES.NS's P/E ratio is 10.65. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ARIES.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is less volatile compared to ARIES.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check ARIES.NS's competition here
UPL.BO vs RAMAPHO.BO Comparison May 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 539B. In comparison, RAMAPHO.BO has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹638.55, while RAMAPHO.BO trades at ₹130.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.62, whereas RAMAPHO.BO's P/E ratio is 8.79. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RAMAPHO.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is less volatile compared to RAMAPHO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check RAMAPHO.BO's competition here
UPL.BO vs RAMAPHO.NS Comparison May 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 539B. In comparison, RAMAPHO.NS has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹638.55, while RAMAPHO.NS trades at ₹130.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.62, whereas RAMAPHO.NS's P/E ratio is 8.76. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RAMAPHO.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is less volatile compared to RAMAPHO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check RAMAPHO.NS's competition here
UPL.BO vs ARIES.BO Comparison May 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 539B. In comparison, ARIES.BO has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹638.55, while ARIES.BO trades at ₹353.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.62, whereas ARIES.BO's P/E ratio is 10.55. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ARIES.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is less volatile compared to ARIES.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check ARIES.BO's competition here
UPL.BO vs MISHTANN.BO Comparison May 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 539B. In comparison, MISHTANN.BO has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹638.55, while MISHTANN.BO trades at ₹4.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.62, whereas MISHTANN.BO's P/E ratio is 1.35. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MISHTANN.BO's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is less volatile compared to MISHTANN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check MISHTANN.BO's competition here
UPL.BO vs IGCL.NS Comparison May 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 539B. In comparison, IGCL.NS has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹638.55, while IGCL.NS trades at ₹60.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.62, whereas IGCL.NS's P/E ratio is 11.08. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IGCL.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to IGCL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check IGCL.NS's competition here
UPL.BO vs GOODRICKE.BO Comparison May 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 539B. In comparison, GOODRICKE.BO has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹638.55, while GOODRICKE.BO trades at ₹175.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.62, whereas GOODRICKE.BO's P/E ratio is 20.79. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GOODRICKE.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to GOODRICKE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check GOODRICKE.BO's competition here
UPL.BO vs KINGSINFR.BO Comparison May 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 539B. In comparison, KINGSINFR.BO has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹638.55, while KINGSINFR.BO trades at ₹124.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.62, whereas KINGSINFR.BO's P/E ratio is 22.39. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KINGSINFR.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is less volatile compared to KINGSINFR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check KINGSINFR.BO's competition here
UPL.BO vs NATHBIOGEN.BO Comparison May 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 539B. In comparison, NATHBIOGEN.BO has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹638.55, while NATHBIOGEN.BO trades at ₹158.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.62, whereas NATHBIOGEN.BO's P/E ratio is 7.55. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NATHBIOGEN.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is less volatile compared to NATHBIOGEN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check NATHBIOGEN.BO's competition here
UPL.BO vs NATHBIOGEN.NS Comparison May 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 539B. In comparison, NATHBIOGEN.NS has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹638.55, while NATHBIOGEN.NS trades at ₹158.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.62, whereas NATHBIOGEN.NS's P/E ratio is 7.55. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NATHBIOGEN.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is less volatile compared to NATHBIOGEN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check NATHBIOGEN.NS's competition here
UPL.BO vs NOVAAGRI.NS Comparison May 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 539B. In comparison, NOVAAGRI.NS has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹638.55, while NOVAAGRI.NS trades at ₹27.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.62, whereas NOVAAGRI.NS's P/E ratio is 14.32. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NOVAAGRI.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is less volatile compared to NOVAAGRI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check NOVAAGRI.NS's competition here
UPL.BO vs NAGAFERT.NS Comparison May 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 539B. In comparison, NAGAFERT.NS has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹638.55, while NAGAFERT.NS trades at ₹3.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.62, whereas NAGAFERT.NS's P/E ratio is -8.30. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NAGAFERT.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is less volatile compared to NAGAFERT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check NAGAFERT.NS's competition here
UPL.BO vs NAGAFERT.BO Comparison May 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 539B. In comparison, NAGAFERT.BO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹638.55, while NAGAFERT.BO trades at ₹3.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.62, whereas NAGAFERT.BO's P/E ratio is -8.11. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NAGAFERT.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is less volatile compared to NAGAFERT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check NAGAFERT.BO's competition here
UPL.BO vs RBS.NS Comparison May 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 539B. In comparison, RBS.NS has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹638.55, while RBS.NS trades at ₹98.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.62, whereas RBS.NS's P/E ratio is 14.29. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RBS.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is less volatile compared to RBS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check RBS.NS's competition here
UPL.BO vs INDOUS.NS Comparison May 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 539B. In comparison, INDOUS.NS has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹638.55, while INDOUS.NS trades at ₹102.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.62, whereas INDOUS.NS's P/E ratio is 13.86. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to INDOUS.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is less volatile compared to INDOUS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check INDOUS.NS's competition here
UPL.BO vs INDOUS.BO Comparison May 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 539B. In comparison, INDOUS.BO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹638.55, while INDOUS.BO trades at ₹102.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.62, whereas INDOUS.BO's P/E ratio is 13.84. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to INDOUS.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to INDOUS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check INDOUS.BO's competition here
UPL.BO vs HOACFOODS.NS Comparison May 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 539B. In comparison, HOACFOODS.NS has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹638.55, while HOACFOODS.NS trades at ₹467.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.62, whereas HOACFOODS.NS's P/E ratio is 68.98. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HOACFOODS.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is less volatile compared to HOACFOODS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check HOACFOODS.NS's competition here
UPL.BO vs VIJSOLX.BO Comparison May 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 539B. In comparison, VIJSOLX.BO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹638.55, while VIJSOLX.BO trades at ₹608.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.62, whereas VIJSOLX.BO's P/E ratio is 12.71. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VIJSOLX.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is less volatile compared to VIJSOLX.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check VIJSOLX.BO's competition here
UPL.BO vs BHARATAGRI.BO Comparison May 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 539B. In comparison, BHARATAGRI.BO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹638.55, while BHARATAGRI.BO trades at ₹29.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.62, whereas BHARATAGRI.BO's P/E ratio is -76.95. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BHARATAGRI.BO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is less volatile compared to BHARATAGRI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check BHARATAGRI.BO's competition here
UPL.BO vs EQUIPPP.NS Comparison May 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 539B. In comparison, EQUIPPP.NS has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹638.55, while EQUIPPP.NS trades at ₹14.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.62, whereas EQUIPPP.NS's P/E ratio is 207.86. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EQUIPPP.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is more volatile compared to EQUIPPP.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check EQUIPPP.NS's competition here
UPL.BO vs EQUIPPP.BO Comparison May 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 539B. In comparison, EQUIPPP.BO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹638.55, while EQUIPPP.BO trades at ₹14.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.62, whereas EQUIPPP.BO's P/E ratio is 207.14. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EQUIPPP.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is less volatile compared to EQUIPPP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check EQUIPPP.BO's competition here
UPL.BO vs MSL.BO Comparison May 2026
UPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UPL.BO stands at 539B. In comparison, MSL.BO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UPL.BO is priced at ₹638.55, while MSL.BO trades at ₹131.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.62, whereas MSL.BO's P/E ratio is 13.93. In terms of profitability, UPL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MSL.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, UPL.BO is less volatile compared to MSL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UPL.BO.Check MSL.BO's competition here