Rashtriya Chemicals and Fertilizers Limited (RCF.BO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (RCF.BO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Agricultural Inputs Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RCF.BO | ₹136.75 | +1.67% | 75.4B | 17.65 | ₹7.75 | +1.70% |
| COROMANDEL.BO | ₹2,014.60 | -2.59% | 595B | 30.36 | ₹66.35 | +0.55% |
| COROMANDEL.NS | ₹2,015.20 | -2.56% | 593.5B | 30.39 | ₹66.32 | +0.55% |
| FACT.NS | ₹884.85 | -7.19% | 572.6B | -1474.75 | -₹0.60 | +0.04% |
| FACT.BO | ₹884.80 | -7.19% | 572.6B | -1474.67 | -₹0.60 | +0.04% |
| UPL.NS | ₹608.65 | -0.35% | 513.8B | 27.24 | ₹22.34 | +0.99% |
| UPL.BO | ₹607.60 | -0.50% | 513.1B | 27.20 | ₹22.34 | +0.99% |
| PIIND.BO | ₹2,805.45 | -1.40% | 425.8B | 32.23 | ₹87.04 | +0.54% |
| PIIND.NS | ₹2,803.60 | -1.49% | 425.3B | 32.15 | ₹87.20 | +0.54% |
| SUMICHEM.NS | ₹452.70 | +0.08% | 226B | 41.61 | ₹10.88 | +0.27% |
Stock Comparison
RCF.BO vs COROMANDEL.BO Comparison June 2026
RCF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.BO stands at 75.4B. In comparison, COROMANDEL.BO has a market cap of 595B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.BO is priced at ₹136.75, while COROMANDEL.BO trades at ₹2,014.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas COROMANDEL.BO's P/E ratio is 30.36. In terms of profitability, RCF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to COROMANDEL.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.BO is more volatile compared to COROMANDEL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.BO.Check COROMANDEL.BO's competition here
RCF.BO vs COROMANDEL.NS Comparison June 2026
RCF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.BO stands at 75.4B. In comparison, COROMANDEL.NS has a market cap of 593.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.BO is priced at ₹136.75, while COROMANDEL.NS trades at ₹2,015.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas COROMANDEL.NS's P/E ratio is 30.39. In terms of profitability, RCF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to COROMANDEL.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.BO is more volatile compared to COROMANDEL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.BO.Check COROMANDEL.NS's competition here
RCF.BO vs FACT.NS Comparison June 2026
RCF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.BO stands at 75.4B. In comparison, FACT.NS has a market cap of 572.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.BO is priced at ₹136.75, while FACT.NS trades at ₹884.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas FACT.NS's P/E ratio is -1474.75. In terms of profitability, RCF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FACT.NS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.BO is less volatile compared to FACT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.BO.Check FACT.NS's competition here
RCF.BO vs FACT.BO Comparison June 2026
RCF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.BO stands at 75.4B. In comparison, FACT.BO has a market cap of 572.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.BO is priced at ₹136.75, while FACT.BO trades at ₹884.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas FACT.BO's P/E ratio is -1474.67. In terms of profitability, RCF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FACT.BO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.BO is less volatile compared to FACT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.BO.Check FACT.BO's competition here
RCF.BO vs UPL.NS Comparison June 2026
RCF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.BO stands at 75.4B. In comparison, UPL.NS has a market cap of 513.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.BO is priced at ₹136.75, while UPL.NS trades at ₹608.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas UPL.NS's P/E ratio is 27.24. In terms of profitability, RCF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to UPL.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.BO is more volatile compared to UPL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.BO.Check UPL.NS's competition here
RCF.BO vs UPL.BO Comparison June 2026
RCF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.BO stands at 75.4B. In comparison, UPL.BO has a market cap of 513.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.BO is priced at ₹136.75, while UPL.BO trades at ₹607.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas UPL.BO's P/E ratio is 27.20. In terms of profitability, RCF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to UPL.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.BO is more volatile compared to UPL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.BO.Check UPL.BO's competition here
RCF.BO vs PIIND.BO Comparison June 2026
RCF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.BO stands at 75.4B. In comparison, PIIND.BO has a market cap of 425.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.BO is priced at ₹136.75, while PIIND.BO trades at ₹2,805.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas PIIND.BO's P/E ratio is 32.23. In terms of profitability, RCF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PIIND.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.BO is more volatile compared to PIIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.BO.Check PIIND.BO's competition here
RCF.BO vs PIIND.NS Comparison June 2026
RCF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.BO stands at 75.4B. In comparison, PIIND.NS has a market cap of 425.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.BO is priced at ₹136.75, while PIIND.NS trades at ₹2,803.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas PIIND.NS's P/E ratio is 32.15. In terms of profitability, RCF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PIIND.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.BO is more volatile compared to PIIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.BO.Check PIIND.NS's competition here
RCF.BO vs SUMICHEM.NS Comparison June 2026
RCF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.BO stands at 75.4B. In comparison, SUMICHEM.NS has a market cap of 226B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.BO is priced at ₹136.75, while SUMICHEM.NS trades at ₹452.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas SUMICHEM.NS's P/E ratio is 41.61. In terms of profitability, RCF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SUMICHEM.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.BO is more volatile compared to SUMICHEM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.BO.Check SUMICHEM.NS's competition here
RCF.BO vs SUMICHEM.BO Comparison June 2026
RCF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.BO stands at 75.4B. In comparison, SUMICHEM.BO has a market cap of 225.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.BO is priced at ₹136.75, while SUMICHEM.BO trades at ₹452.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas SUMICHEM.BO's P/E ratio is 41.62. In terms of profitability, RCF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SUMICHEM.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.BO is more volatile compared to SUMICHEM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.BO.Check SUMICHEM.BO's competition here
RCF.BO vs CHAMBLFERT.NS Comparison June 2026
RCF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.BO stands at 75.4B. In comparison, CHAMBLFERT.NS has a market cap of 194B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.BO is priced at ₹136.75, while CHAMBLFERT.NS trades at ₹484.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas CHAMBLFERT.NS's P/E ratio is 9.93. In terms of profitability, RCF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CHAMBLFERT.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.BO is more volatile compared to CHAMBLFERT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.BO.Check CHAMBLFERT.NS's competition here
RCF.BO vs CHAMBLFERT.BO Comparison June 2026
RCF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.BO stands at 75.4B. In comparison, CHAMBLFERT.BO has a market cap of 194B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.BO is priced at ₹136.75, while CHAMBLFERT.BO trades at ₹484.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas CHAMBLFERT.BO's P/E ratio is 10.42. In terms of profitability, RCF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CHAMBLFERT.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.BO is more volatile compared to CHAMBLFERT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.BO.Check CHAMBLFERT.BO's competition here
RCF.BO vs BAYERCROP.BO Comparison June 2026
RCF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.BO stands at 75.4B. In comparison, BAYERCROP.BO has a market cap of 192.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.BO is priced at ₹136.75, while BAYERCROP.BO trades at ₹4,276.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas BAYERCROP.BO's P/E ratio is 27.91. In terms of profitability, RCF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BAYERCROP.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.BO is more volatile compared to BAYERCROP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.BO.Check BAYERCROP.BO's competition here
RCF.BO vs BAYERCROP.NS Comparison June 2026
RCF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.BO stands at 75.4B. In comparison, BAYERCROP.NS has a market cap of 191.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.BO is priced at ₹136.75, while BAYERCROP.NS trades at ₹4,269.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas BAYERCROP.NS's P/E ratio is 27.86. In terms of profitability, RCF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BAYERCROP.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.BO is more volatile compared to BAYERCROP.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.BO.Check BAYERCROP.NS's competition here
RCF.BO vs ATUL7.BO Comparison June 2026
RCF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.BO stands at 75.4B. In comparison, ATUL7.BO has a market cap of 179B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.BO is priced at ₹136.75, while ATUL7.BO trades at ₹7,100.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas ATUL7.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RCF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ATUL7.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.BO is more volatile compared to ATUL7.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.BO.Check ATUL7.BO's competition here
RCF.BO vs EIDPARRY.BO Comparison June 2026
RCF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.BO stands at 75.4B. In comparison, EIDPARRY.BO has a market cap of 125.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.BO is priced at ₹136.75, while EIDPARRY.BO trades at ₹704.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas EIDPARRY.BO's P/E ratio is 10.90. In terms of profitability, RCF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EIDPARRY.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.BO is more volatile compared to EIDPARRY.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.BO.Check EIDPARRY.BO's competition here
RCF.BO vs EIDPARRY.NS Comparison June 2026
RCF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.BO stands at 75.4B. In comparison, EIDPARRY.NS has a market cap of 125.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.BO is priced at ₹136.75, while EIDPARRY.NS trades at ₹704.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas EIDPARRY.NS's P/E ratio is 10.55. In terms of profitability, RCF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EIDPARRY.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.BO is more volatile compared to EIDPARRY.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.BO.Check EIDPARRY.NS's competition here
RCF.BO vs PARADEEP.NS Comparison June 2026
RCF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.BO stands at 75.4B. In comparison, PARADEEP.NS has a market cap of 111.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.BO is priced at ₹136.75, while PARADEEP.NS trades at ₹136.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas PARADEEP.NS's P/E ratio is 14.19. In terms of profitability, RCF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PARADEEP.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.BO is more volatile compared to PARADEEP.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.BO.Check PARADEEP.NS's competition here
RCF.BO vs PARADEEP.BO Comparison June 2026
RCF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.BO stands at 75.4B. In comparison, PARADEEP.BO has a market cap of 111.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.BO is priced at ₹136.75, while PARADEEP.BO trades at ₹136.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas PARADEEP.BO's P/E ratio is 14.20. In terms of profitability, RCF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PARADEEP.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.BO is more volatile compared to PARADEEP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.BO.Check PARADEEP.BO's competition here
RCF.BO vs SHARDACROP.BO Comparison June 2026
RCF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.BO stands at 75.4B. In comparison, SHARDACROP.BO has a market cap of 81.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.BO is priced at ₹136.75, while SHARDACROP.BO trades at ₹901.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas SHARDACROP.BO's P/E ratio is 11.94. In terms of profitability, RCF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SHARDACROP.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.BO is more volatile compared to SHARDACROP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.BO.Check SHARDACROP.BO's competition here
RCF.BO vs SHARDACROP.NS Comparison June 2026
RCF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.BO stands at 75.4B. In comparison, SHARDACROP.NS has a market cap of 81.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.BO is priced at ₹136.75, while SHARDACROP.NS trades at ₹900.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas SHARDACROP.NS's P/E ratio is 11.93. In terms of profitability, RCF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SHARDACROP.NS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.BO is more volatile compared to SHARDACROP.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.BO.Check SHARDACROP.NS's competition here
RCF.BO vs RCF.NS Comparison June 2026
RCF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.BO stands at 75.4B. In comparison, RCF.NS has a market cap of 75.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.BO is priced at ₹136.75, while RCF.NS trades at ₹136.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas RCF.NS's P/E ratio is 17.61. In terms of profitability, RCF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RCF.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.BO and RCF.NS have similar daily volatility (4.44).Check RCF.NS's competition here
RCF.BO vs GSFC.BO Comparison June 2026
RCF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.BO stands at 75.4B. In comparison, GSFC.BO has a market cap of 65.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.BO is priced at ₹136.75, while GSFC.BO trades at ₹165.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas GSFC.BO's P/E ratio is 9.88. In terms of profitability, RCF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GSFC.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.BO is more volatile compared to GSFC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.BO.Check GSFC.BO's competition here
RCF.BO vs GSFC.NS Comparison June 2026
RCF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.BO stands at 75.4B. In comparison, GSFC.NS has a market cap of 65.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.BO is priced at ₹136.75, while GSFC.NS trades at ₹165.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas GSFC.NS's P/E ratio is 9.80. In terms of profitability, RCF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GSFC.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.BO is more volatile compared to GSFC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.BO.Check GSFC.NS's competition here
RCF.BO vs PICCADIL.BO Comparison June 2026
RCF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.BO stands at 75.4B. In comparison, PICCADIL.BO has a market cap of 57.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.BO is priced at ₹136.75, while PICCADIL.BO trades at ₹578.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas PICCADIL.BO's P/E ratio is 40.77. In terms of profitability, RCF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PICCADIL.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.BO is more volatile compared to PICCADIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.BO.Check PICCADIL.BO's competition here
RCF.BO vs CIANAGRO.BO Comparison June 2026
RCF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.BO stands at 75.4B. In comparison, CIANAGRO.BO has a market cap of 54.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.BO is priced at ₹136.75, while CIANAGRO.BO trades at ₹1,960.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas CIANAGRO.BO's P/E ratio is 48.82. In terms of profitability, RCF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CIANAGRO.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.BO is less volatile compared to CIANAGRO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.BO.Check CIANAGRO.BO's competition here
RCF.BO vs MBAPL.NS Comparison June 2026
RCF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.BO stands at 75.4B. In comparison, MBAPL.NS has a market cap of 49.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.BO is priced at ₹136.75, while MBAPL.NS trades at ₹563.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas MBAPL.NS's P/E ratio is 32.85. In terms of profitability, RCF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MBAPL.NS's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.BO is more volatile compared to MBAPL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.BO.Check MBAPL.NS's competition here
RCF.BO vs DHANUKA.NS Comparison June 2026
RCF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.BO stands at 75.4B. In comparison, DHANUKA.NS has a market cap of 48.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.BO is priced at ₹136.75, while DHANUKA.NS trades at ₹1,068.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas DHANUKA.NS's P/E ratio is 16.76. In terms of profitability, RCF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DHANUKA.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.BO is more volatile compared to DHANUKA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.BO.Check DHANUKA.NS's competition here
RCF.BO vs DHANUKA.BO Comparison June 2026
RCF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.BO stands at 75.4B. In comparison, DHANUKA.BO has a market cap of 48B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.BO is priced at ₹136.75, while DHANUKA.BO trades at ₹1,065.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas DHANUKA.BO's P/E ratio is 16.73. In terms of profitability, RCF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DHANUKA.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.BO is more volatile compared to DHANUKA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.BO.Check DHANUKA.BO's competition here
RCF.BO vs RALLIS.NS Comparison June 2026
RCF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.BO stands at 75.4B. In comparison, RALLIS.NS has a market cap of 44.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.BO is priced at ₹136.75, while RALLIS.NS trades at ₹229.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas RALLIS.NS's P/E ratio is 24.32. In terms of profitability, RCF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RALLIS.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.BO is more volatile compared to RALLIS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.BO.Check RALLIS.NS's competition here
RCF.BO vs RALLIS.BO Comparison June 2026
RCF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.BO stands at 75.4B. In comparison, RALLIS.BO has a market cap of 44.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.BO is priced at ₹136.75, while RALLIS.BO trades at ₹229.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas RALLIS.BO's P/E ratio is 26.79. In terms of profitability, RCF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RALLIS.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.BO is more volatile compared to RALLIS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.BO.Check RALLIS.BO's competition here
RCF.BO vs KSCL.NS Comparison June 2026
RCF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.BO stands at 75.4B. In comparison, KSCL.NS has a market cap of 43.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.BO is priced at ₹136.75, while KSCL.NS trades at ₹849.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas KSCL.NS's P/E ratio is 14.91. In terms of profitability, RCF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KSCL.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.BO is more volatile compared to KSCL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.BO.Check KSCL.NS's competition here
RCF.BO vs KSCL.BO Comparison June 2026
RCF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.BO stands at 75.4B. In comparison, KSCL.BO has a market cap of 43.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.BO is priced at ₹136.75, while KSCL.BO trades at ₹848.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas KSCL.BO's P/E ratio is 14.91. In terms of profitability, RCF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KSCL.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.BO is more volatile compared to KSCL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.BO.Check KSCL.BO's competition here
RCF.BO vs KRISHANA.NS Comparison June 2026
RCF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.BO stands at 75.4B. In comparison, KRISHANA.NS has a market cap of 42B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.BO is priced at ₹136.75, while KRISHANA.NS trades at ₹679.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas KRISHANA.NS's P/E ratio is 23.33. In terms of profitability, RCF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KRISHANA.NS's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.BO is more volatile compared to KRISHANA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.BO.Check KRISHANA.NS's competition here
RCF.BO vs NFL.BO Comparison June 2026
RCF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.BO stands at 75.4B. In comparison, NFL.BO has a market cap of 38.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.BO is priced at ₹136.75, while NFL.BO trades at ₹77.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas NFL.BO's P/E ratio is 18.06. In terms of profitability, RCF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NFL.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.BO is more volatile compared to NFL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.BO.Check NFL.BO's competition here
RCF.BO vs NFL.NS Comparison June 2026
RCF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.BO stands at 75.4B. In comparison, NFL.NS has a market cap of 38.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.BO is priced at ₹136.75, while NFL.NS trades at ₹77.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas NFL.NS's P/E ratio is 18.06. In terms of profitability, RCF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NFL.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.BO is more volatile compared to NFL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.BO.Check NFL.NS's competition here
RCF.BO vs NACLIND.BO Comparison June 2026
RCF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.BO stands at 75.4B. In comparison, NACLIND.BO has a market cap of 38B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.BO is priced at ₹136.75, while NACLIND.BO trades at ₹193.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas NACLIND.BO's P/E ratio is 923.57. In terms of profitability, RCF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NACLIND.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.BO is less volatile compared to NACLIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.BO.Check NACLIND.BO's competition here
RCF.BO vs NACLIND.NS Comparison June 2026
RCF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.BO stands at 75.4B. In comparison, NACLIND.NS has a market cap of 38B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.BO is priced at ₹136.75, while NACLIND.NS trades at ₹193.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas NACLIND.NS's P/E ratio is 922.86. In terms of profitability, RCF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NACLIND.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.BO is less volatile compared to NACLIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.BO.Check NACLIND.NS's competition here
RCF.BO vs MANGCHEFER.NS Comparison June 2026
RCF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.BO stands at 75.4B. In comparison, MANGCHEFER.NS has a market cap of 36.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.BO is priced at ₹136.75, while MANGCHEFER.NS trades at ₹308.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas MANGCHEFER.NS's P/E ratio is 22.67. In terms of profitability, RCF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MANGCHEFER.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.BO is more volatile compared to MANGCHEFER.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.BO.Check MANGCHEFER.NS's competition here
RCF.BO vs MANGCHEFER.BO Comparison June 2026
RCF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.BO stands at 75.4B. In comparison, MANGCHEFER.BO has a market cap of 36.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.BO is priced at ₹136.75, while MANGCHEFER.BO trades at ₹308.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas MANGCHEFER.BO's P/E ratio is 22.63. In terms of profitability, RCF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MANGCHEFER.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.BO is more volatile compared to MANGCHEFER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.BO.Check MANGCHEFER.BO's competition here
RCF.BO vs BHAGCHEM.NS Comparison June 2026
RCF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.BO stands at 75.4B. In comparison, BHAGCHEM.NS has a market cap of 36.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.BO is priced at ₹136.75, while BHAGCHEM.NS trades at ₹279.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas BHAGCHEM.NS's P/E ratio is 256.20. In terms of profitability, RCF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BHAGCHEM.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.BO is less volatile compared to BHAGCHEM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.BO.Check BHAGCHEM.NS's competition here
RCF.BO vs BHAGCHEM.BO Comparison June 2026
RCF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.BO stands at 75.4B. In comparison, BHAGCHEM.BO has a market cap of 36B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.BO is priced at ₹136.75, while BHAGCHEM.BO trades at ₹279.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas BHAGCHEM.BO's P/E ratio is 252.03. In terms of profitability, RCF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BHAGCHEM.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.BO is less volatile compared to BHAGCHEM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.BO.Check BHAGCHEM.BO's competition here
RCF.BO vs BNHOLDINGS.BO Comparison June 2026
RCF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.BO stands at 75.4B. In comparison, BNHOLDINGS.BO has a market cap of 34.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.BO is priced at ₹136.75, while BNHOLDINGS.BO trades at ₹355.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas BNHOLDINGS.BO's P/E ratio is 26.71. In terms of profitability, RCF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BNHOLDINGS.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.BO is less volatile compared to BNHOLDINGS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.BO.Check BNHOLDINGS.BO's competition here
RCF.BO vs VENKYS.BO Comparison June 2026
RCF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.BO stands at 75.4B. In comparison, VENKYS.BO has a market cap of 24.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.BO is priced at ₹136.75, while VENKYS.BO trades at ₹1,714.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas VENKYS.BO's P/E ratio is -57.49. In terms of profitability, RCF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VENKYS.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.BO is less volatile compared to VENKYS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.BO.Check VENKYS.BO's competition here
RCF.BO vs KSE.NS Comparison June 2026
RCF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.BO stands at 75.4B. In comparison, KSE.NS has a market cap of 22.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.BO is priced at ₹136.75, while KSE.NS trades at ₹697.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas KSE.NS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RCF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KSE.NS's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.BO is more volatile compared to KSE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.BO.Check KSE.NS's competition here
RCF.BO vs INSECTICID.NS Comparison June 2026
RCF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.BO stands at 75.4B. In comparison, INSECTICID.NS has a market cap of 20B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.BO is priced at ₹136.75, while INSECTICID.NS trades at ₹688.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas INSECTICID.NS's P/E ratio is 14.37. In terms of profitability, RCF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to INSECTICID.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.BO is more volatile compared to INSECTICID.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.BO.Check INSECTICID.NS's competition here
RCF.BO vs INSECTICID.BO Comparison June 2026
RCF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.BO stands at 75.4B. In comparison, INSECTICID.BO has a market cap of 20B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.BO is priced at ₹136.75, while INSECTICID.BO trades at ₹687.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas INSECTICID.BO's P/E ratio is 14.36. In terms of profitability, RCF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to INSECTICID.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.BO is more volatile compared to INSECTICID.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.BO.Check INSECTICID.BO's competition here
RCF.BO vs IPL.NS Comparison June 2026
RCF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.BO stands at 75.4B. In comparison, IPL.NS has a market cap of 18.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.BO is priced at ₹136.75, while IPL.NS trades at ₹160.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas IPL.NS's P/E ratio is 15.40. In terms of profitability, RCF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IPL.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.BO is more volatile compared to IPL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.BO.Check IPL.NS's competition here
RCF.BO vs IPL.BO Comparison June 2026
RCF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.BO stands at 75.4B. In comparison, IPL.BO has a market cap of 18.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.BO is priced at ₹136.75, while IPL.BO trades at ₹159.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas IPL.BO's P/E ratio is 15.35. In terms of profitability, RCF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IPL.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.BO is more volatile compared to IPL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.BO.Check IPL.BO's competition here
RCF.BO vs ASTEC.NS Comparison June 2026
RCF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.BO stands at 75.4B. In comparison, ASTEC.NS has a market cap of 17.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.BO is priced at ₹136.75, while ASTEC.NS trades at ₹797.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas ASTEC.NS's P/E ratio is -21.13. In terms of profitability, RCF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ASTEC.NS's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.BO is more volatile compared to ASTEC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.BO.Check ASTEC.NS's competition here
RCF.BO vs ASTEC.BO Comparison June 2026
RCF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.BO stands at 75.4B. In comparison, ASTEC.BO has a market cap of 17.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.BO is priced at ₹136.75, while ASTEC.BO trades at ₹797.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas ASTEC.BO's P/E ratio is -21.09. In terms of profitability, RCF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ASTEC.BO's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.BO is more volatile compared to ASTEC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.BO.Check ASTEC.BO's competition here
RCF.BO vs SPIC.NS Comparison June 2026
RCF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.BO stands at 75.4B. In comparison, SPIC.NS has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.BO is priced at ₹136.75, while SPIC.NS trades at ₹70.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas SPIC.NS's P/E ratio is 6.80. In terms of profitability, RCF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SPIC.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.BO is more volatile compared to SPIC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.BO.Check SPIC.NS's competition here
RCF.BO vs SPIC.BO Comparison June 2026
RCF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.BO stands at 75.4B. In comparison, SPIC.BO has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.BO is priced at ₹136.75, while SPIC.BO trades at ₹70.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas SPIC.BO's P/E ratio is 7.74. In terms of profitability, RCF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SPIC.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.BO is more volatile compared to SPIC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.BO.Check SPIC.BO's competition here
RCF.BO vs MOL.BO Comparison June 2026
RCF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.BO stands at 75.4B. In comparison, MOL.BO has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.BO is priced at ₹136.75, while MOL.BO trades at ₹50.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas MOL.BO's P/E ratio is 44.53. In terms of profitability, RCF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MOL.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.BO is more volatile compared to MOL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.BO.Check MOL.BO's competition here
RCF.BO vs MOL.NS Comparison June 2026
RCF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.BO stands at 75.4B. In comparison, MOL.NS has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.BO is priced at ₹136.75, while MOL.NS trades at ₹50.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas MOL.NS's P/E ratio is 44.50. In terms of profitability, RCF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MOL.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.BO is more volatile compared to MOL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.BO.Check MOL.NS's competition here
RCF.BO vs BHARATRAS.NS Comparison June 2026
RCF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.BO stands at 75.4B. In comparison, BHARATRAS.NS has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.BO is priced at ₹136.75, while BHARATRAS.NS trades at ₹1,422.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas BHARATRAS.NS's P/E ratio is 4.06. In terms of profitability, RCF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BHARATRAS.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.BO is more volatile compared to BHARATRAS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.BO.Check BHARATRAS.NS's competition here
RCF.BO vs BHARATRAS.BO Comparison June 2026
RCF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.BO stands at 75.4B. In comparison, BHARATRAS.BO has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.BO is priced at ₹136.75, while BHARATRAS.BO trades at ₹1,422.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas BHARATRAS.BO's P/E ratio is 17.73. In terms of profitability, RCF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BHARATRAS.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.BO is more volatile compared to BHARATRAS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.BO.Check BHARATRAS.BO's competition here
RCF.BO vs MADRASFERT.NS Comparison June 2026
RCF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.BO stands at 75.4B. In comparison, MADRASFERT.NS has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.BO is priced at ₹136.75, while MADRASFERT.NS trades at ₹71.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas MADRASFERT.NS's P/E ratio is 14.40. In terms of profitability, RCF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MADRASFERT.NS's ROE of +6.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.BO is more volatile compared to MADRASFERT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.BO.Check MADRASFERT.NS's competition here
RCF.BO vs MADRASFERT.BO Comparison June 2026
RCF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.BO stands at 75.4B. In comparison, MADRASFERT.BO has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.BO is priced at ₹136.75, while MADRASFERT.BO trades at ₹71.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas MADRASFERT.BO's P/E ratio is 14.42. In terms of profitability, RCF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MADRASFERT.BO's ROE of +6.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.BO is more volatile compared to MADRASFERT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.BO.Check MADRASFERT.BO's competition here
RCF.BO vs ZUARI.NS Comparison June 2026
RCF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.BO stands at 75.4B. In comparison, ZUARI.NS has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.BO is priced at ₹136.75, while ZUARI.NS trades at ₹238.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas ZUARI.NS's P/E ratio is 1.09. In terms of profitability, RCF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ZUARI.NS's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.BO is less volatile compared to ZUARI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.BO.Check ZUARI.NS's competition here
RCF.BO vs ZUARI.BO Comparison June 2026
RCF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.BO stands at 75.4B. In comparison, ZUARI.BO has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.BO is priced at ₹136.75, while ZUARI.BO trades at ₹238.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas ZUARI.BO's P/E ratio is 1.09. In terms of profitability, RCF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ZUARI.BO's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.BO is less volatile compared to ZUARI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.BO.Check ZUARI.BO's competition here
RCF.BO vs BSHSL.NS Comparison June 2026
RCF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.BO stands at 75.4B. In comparison, BSHSL.NS has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.BO is priced at ₹136.75, while BSHSL.NS trades at ₹90.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas BSHSL.NS's P/E ratio is 35.46. In terms of profitability, RCF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BSHSL.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.BO is more volatile compared to BSHSL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.BO.Check BSHSL.NS's competition here
RCF.BO vs DHARMAJ.BO Comparison June 2026
RCF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.BO stands at 75.4B. In comparison, DHARMAJ.BO has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.BO is priced at ₹136.75, while DHARMAJ.BO trades at ₹264.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas DHARMAJ.BO's P/E ratio is 16.36. In terms of profitability, RCF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DHARMAJ.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.BO is more volatile compared to DHARMAJ.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.BO.Check DHARMAJ.BO's competition here
RCF.BO vs DHARMAJ.NS Comparison June 2026
RCF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.BO stands at 75.4B. In comparison, DHARMAJ.NS has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.BO is priced at ₹136.75, while DHARMAJ.NS trades at ₹264.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas DHARMAJ.NS's P/E ratio is 16.35. In terms of profitability, RCF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DHARMAJ.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.BO is more volatile compared to DHARMAJ.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.BO.Check DHARMAJ.NS's competition here
RCF.BO vs BAJAJST.BO Comparison June 2026
RCF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.BO stands at 75.4B. In comparison, BAJAJST.BO has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.BO is priced at ₹136.75, while BAJAJST.BO trades at ₹420.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas BAJAJST.BO's P/E ratio is 23.33. In terms of profitability, RCF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BAJAJST.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.BO is less volatile compared to BAJAJST.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.BO.Check BAJAJST.BO's competition here
RCF.BO vs BLUECLOUDS.BO Comparison June 2026
RCF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.BO stands at 75.4B. In comparison, BLUECLOUDS.BO has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.BO is priced at ₹136.75, while BLUECLOUDS.BO trades at ₹18.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas BLUECLOUDS.BO's P/E ratio is 15.98. In terms of profitability, RCF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BLUECLOUDS.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.BO is more volatile compared to BLUECLOUDS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.BO.Check BLUECLOUDS.BO's competition here
RCF.BO vs HERANBA.NS Comparison June 2026
RCF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.BO stands at 75.4B. In comparison, HERANBA.NS has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.BO is priced at ₹136.75, while HERANBA.NS trades at ₹188.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas HERANBA.NS's P/E ratio is -9.86. In terms of profitability, RCF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HERANBA.NS's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.BO is more volatile compared to HERANBA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.BO.Check HERANBA.NS's competition here
RCF.BO vs HERANBA.BO Comparison June 2026
RCF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.BO stands at 75.4B. In comparison, HERANBA.BO has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.BO is priced at ₹136.75, while HERANBA.BO trades at ₹188.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas HERANBA.BO's P/E ratio is -9.86. In terms of profitability, RCF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HERANBA.BO's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.BO is more volatile compared to HERANBA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.BO.Check HERANBA.BO's competition here
RCF.BO vs SHINDL.BO Comparison June 2026
RCF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.BO stands at 75.4B. In comparison, SHINDL.BO has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.BO is priced at ₹136.75, while SHINDL.BO trades at ₹154.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas SHINDL.BO's P/E ratio is 37.99. In terms of profitability, RCF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SHINDL.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.BO is less volatile compared to SHINDL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.BO.Check SHINDL.BO's competition here
RCF.BO vs KSE.BO Comparison June 2026
RCF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.BO stands at 75.4B. In comparison, KSE.BO has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.BO is priced at ₹136.75, while KSE.BO trades at ₹188.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas KSE.BO's P/E ratio is 7.19. In terms of profitability, RCF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KSE.BO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.BO is more volatile compared to KSE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.BO.Check KSE.BO's competition here
RCF.BO vs BESTAGRO.NS Comparison June 2026
RCF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.BO stands at 75.4B. In comparison, BESTAGRO.NS has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.BO is priced at ₹136.75, while BESTAGRO.NS trades at ₹15.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas BESTAGRO.NS's P/E ratio is 63.60. In terms of profitability, RCF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BESTAGRO.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.BO is more volatile compared to BESTAGRO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.BO.Check BESTAGRO.NS's competition here
RCF.BO vs BESTAGRO.BO Comparison June 2026
RCF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.BO stands at 75.4B. In comparison, BESTAGRO.BO has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.BO is priced at ₹136.75, while BESTAGRO.BO trades at ₹15.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas BESTAGRO.BO's P/E ratio is 63.68. In terms of profitability, RCF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BESTAGRO.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.BO is less volatile compared to BESTAGRO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.BO.Check BESTAGRO.BO's competition here
RCF.BO vs KHAICHEM.NS Comparison June 2026
RCF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.BO stands at 75.4B. In comparison, KHAICHEM.NS has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.BO is priced at ₹136.75, while KHAICHEM.NS trades at ₹56.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas KHAICHEM.NS's P/E ratio is 8.00. In terms of profitability, RCF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KHAICHEM.NS's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.BO is more volatile compared to KHAICHEM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.BO.Check KHAICHEM.NS's competition here
RCF.BO vs KHAICHEM.BO Comparison June 2026
RCF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.BO stands at 75.4B. In comparison, KHAICHEM.BO has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.BO is priced at ₹136.75, while KHAICHEM.BO trades at ₹55.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas KHAICHEM.BO's P/E ratio is 7.83. In terms of profitability, RCF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KHAICHEM.BO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.BO is more volatile compared to KHAICHEM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.BO.Check KHAICHEM.BO's competition here
RCF.BO vs SVRL.BO Comparison June 2026
RCF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.BO stands at 75.4B. In comparison, SVRL.BO has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.BO is priced at ₹136.75, while SVRL.BO trades at ₹242.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas SVRL.BO's P/E ratio is 14.02. In terms of profitability, RCF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SVRL.BO's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.BO is more volatile compared to SVRL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.BO.Check SVRL.BO's competition here
RCF.BO vs MODINATUR.BO Comparison June 2026
RCF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.BO stands at 75.4B. In comparison, MODINATUR.BO has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.BO is priced at ₹136.75, while MODINATUR.BO trades at ₹400.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas MODINATUR.BO's P/E ratio is 10.54. In terms of profitability, RCF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MODINATUR.BO's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.BO is more volatile compared to MODINATUR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.BO.Check MODINATUR.BO's competition here
RCF.BO vs KNAGRI.NS Comparison June 2026
RCF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.BO stands at 75.4B. In comparison, KNAGRI.NS has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.BO is priced at ₹136.75, while KNAGRI.NS trades at ₹211.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas KNAGRI.NS's P/E ratio is 14.37. In terms of profitability, RCF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KNAGRI.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.BO is less volatile compared to KNAGRI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.BO.Check KNAGRI.NS's competition here
RCF.BO vs RAMAPHO.NS Comparison June 2026
RCF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.BO stands at 75.4B. In comparison, RAMAPHO.NS has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.BO is priced at ₹136.75, while RAMAPHO.NS trades at ₹129.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas RAMAPHO.NS's P/E ratio is 8.66. In terms of profitability, RCF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RAMAPHO.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.BO is less volatile compared to RAMAPHO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.BO.Check RAMAPHO.NS's competition here
RCF.BO vs RAMAPHO.BO Comparison June 2026
RCF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.BO stands at 75.4B. In comparison, RAMAPHO.BO has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.BO is priced at ₹136.75, while RAMAPHO.BO trades at ₹128.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas RAMAPHO.BO's P/E ratio is 8.65. In terms of profitability, RCF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RAMAPHO.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.BO is less volatile compared to RAMAPHO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.BO.Check RAMAPHO.BO's competition here
RCF.BO vs ARIES.NS Comparison June 2026
RCF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.BO stands at 75.4B. In comparison, ARIES.NS has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.BO is priced at ₹136.75, while ARIES.NS trades at ₹328.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas ARIES.NS's P/E ratio is 9.96. In terms of profitability, RCF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ARIES.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.BO is more volatile compared to ARIES.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.BO.Check ARIES.NS's competition here
RCF.BO vs MISHTANN.BO Comparison June 2026
RCF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.BO stands at 75.4B. In comparison, MISHTANN.BO has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.BO is priced at ₹136.75, while MISHTANN.BO trades at ₹3.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas MISHTANN.BO's P/E ratio is 1.62. In terms of profitability, RCF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MISHTANN.BO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.BO is more volatile compared to MISHTANN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.BO.Check MISHTANN.BO's competition here
RCF.BO vs ARIES.BO Comparison June 2026
RCF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.BO stands at 75.4B. In comparison, ARIES.BO has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.BO is priced at ₹136.75, while ARIES.BO trades at ₹327.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas ARIES.BO's P/E ratio is 9.94. In terms of profitability, RCF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ARIES.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.BO is more volatile compared to ARIES.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.BO.Check ARIES.BO's competition here
RCF.BO vs IGCL.NS Comparison June 2026
RCF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.BO stands at 75.4B. In comparison, IGCL.NS has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.BO is priced at ₹136.75, while IGCL.NS trades at ₹61.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas IGCL.NS's P/E ratio is 9.13. In terms of profitability, RCF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IGCL.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.BO is less volatile compared to IGCL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.BO.Check IGCL.NS's competition here
RCF.BO vs SBECSUG.BO Comparison June 2026
RCF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.BO stands at 75.4B. In comparison, SBECSUG.BO has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.BO is priced at ₹136.75, while SBECSUG.BO trades at ₹80.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas SBECSUG.BO's P/E ratio is 20.59. In terms of profitability, RCF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SBECSUG.BO's ROE of -1.29%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.BO is less volatile compared to SBECSUG.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.BO.Check SBECSUG.BO's competition here
RCF.BO vs GOODRICKE.BO Comparison June 2026
RCF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.BO stands at 75.4B. In comparison, GOODRICKE.BO has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.BO is priced at ₹136.75, while GOODRICKE.BO trades at ₹176.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas GOODRICKE.BO's P/E ratio is 14.93. In terms of profitability, RCF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GOODRICKE.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.BO is more volatile compared to GOODRICKE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.BO.Check GOODRICKE.BO's competition here
RCF.BO vs KINGSINFR.BO Comparison June 2026
RCF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.BO stands at 75.4B. In comparison, KINGSINFR.BO has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.BO is priced at ₹136.75, while KINGSINFR.BO trades at ₹127.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas KINGSINFR.BO's P/E ratio is 19.32. In terms of profitability, RCF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KINGSINFR.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.BO is more volatile compared to KINGSINFR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.BO.Check KINGSINFR.BO's competition here
RCF.BO vs NATHBIOGEN.NS Comparison June 2026
RCF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.BO stands at 75.4B. In comparison, NATHBIOGEN.NS has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.BO is priced at ₹136.75, while NATHBIOGEN.NS trades at ₹160.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas NATHBIOGEN.NS's P/E ratio is 7.66. In terms of profitability, RCF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NATHBIOGEN.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.BO is less volatile compared to NATHBIOGEN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.BO.Check NATHBIOGEN.NS's competition here
RCF.BO vs NATHBIOGEN.BO Comparison June 2026
RCF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.BO stands at 75.4B. In comparison, NATHBIOGEN.BO has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.BO is priced at ₹136.75, while NATHBIOGEN.BO trades at ₹160.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas NATHBIOGEN.BO's P/E ratio is 7.67. In terms of profitability, RCF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NATHBIOGEN.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.BO is less volatile compared to NATHBIOGEN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.BO.Check NATHBIOGEN.BO's competition here
RCF.BO vs HOACFOODS.NS Comparison June 2026
RCF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.BO stands at 75.4B. In comparison, HOACFOODS.NS has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.BO is priced at ₹136.75, while HOACFOODS.NS trades at ₹635.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas HOACFOODS.NS's P/E ratio is 93.80. In terms of profitability, RCF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HOACFOODS.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.BO is more volatile compared to HOACFOODS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.BO.Check HOACFOODS.NS's competition here
RCF.BO vs NOVAAGRI.NS Comparison June 2026
RCF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.BO stands at 75.4B. In comparison, NOVAAGRI.NS has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.BO is priced at ₹136.75, while NOVAAGRI.NS trades at ₹25.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas NOVAAGRI.NS's P/E ratio is 18.08. In terms of profitability, RCF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NOVAAGRI.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.BO is less volatile compared to NOVAAGRI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.BO.Check NOVAAGRI.NS's competition here
RCF.BO vs EQUIPPP.NS Comparison June 2026
RCF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.BO stands at 75.4B. In comparison, EQUIPPP.NS has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.BO is priced at ₹136.75, while EQUIPPP.NS trades at ₹22.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas EQUIPPP.NS's P/E ratio is 122.22. In terms of profitability, RCF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EQUIPPP.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.BO is less volatile compared to EQUIPPP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.BO.Check EQUIPPP.NS's competition here
RCF.BO vs EQUIPPP.BO Comparison June 2026
RCF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.BO stands at 75.4B. In comparison, EQUIPPP.BO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.BO is priced at ₹136.75, while EQUIPPP.BO trades at ₹22.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas EQUIPPP.BO's P/E ratio is 122.22. In terms of profitability, RCF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EQUIPPP.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.BO is less volatile compared to EQUIPPP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.BO.Check EQUIPPP.BO's competition here
RCF.BO vs NAGAFERT.BO Comparison June 2026
RCF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.BO stands at 75.4B. In comparison, NAGAFERT.BO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.BO is priced at ₹136.75, while NAGAFERT.BO trades at ₹3.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas NAGAFERT.BO's P/E ratio is -7.62. In terms of profitability, RCF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NAGAFERT.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.BO is less volatile compared to NAGAFERT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.BO.Check NAGAFERT.BO's competition here
RCF.BO vs NAGAFERT.NS Comparison June 2026
RCF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.BO stands at 75.4B. In comparison, NAGAFERT.NS has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.BO is priced at ₹136.75, while NAGAFERT.NS trades at ₹3.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas NAGAFERT.NS's P/E ratio is -7.49. In terms of profitability, RCF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NAGAFERT.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.BO is more volatile compared to NAGAFERT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.BO.Check NAGAFERT.NS's competition here
RCF.BO vs VIJSOLX.BO Comparison June 2026
RCF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.BO stands at 75.4B. In comparison, VIJSOLX.BO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.BO is priced at ₹136.75, while VIJSOLX.BO trades at ₹630.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas VIJSOLX.BO's P/E ratio is 10.45. In terms of profitability, RCF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VIJSOLX.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.BO is more volatile compared to VIJSOLX.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.BO.Check VIJSOLX.BO's competition here
RCF.BO vs RBS.NS Comparison June 2026
RCF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.BO stands at 75.4B. In comparison, RBS.NS has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.BO is priced at ₹136.75, while RBS.NS trades at ₹88.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas RBS.NS's P/E ratio is 12.83. In terms of profitability, RCF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RBS.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.BO is more volatile compared to RBS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.BO.Check RBS.NS's competition here
RCF.BO vs INDOUS.NS Comparison June 2026
RCF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.BO stands at 75.4B. In comparison, INDOUS.NS has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.BO is priced at ₹136.75, while INDOUS.NS trades at ₹91.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas INDOUS.NS's P/E ratio is 13.95. In terms of profitability, RCF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to INDOUS.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.BO is more volatile compared to INDOUS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.BO.Check INDOUS.NS's competition here
RCF.BO vs INDOUS.BO Comparison June 2026
RCF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.BO stands at 75.4B. In comparison, INDOUS.BO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.BO is priced at ₹136.75, while INDOUS.BO trades at ₹90.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas INDOUS.BO's P/E ratio is 13.80. In terms of profitability, RCF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to INDOUS.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.BO is more volatile compared to INDOUS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.BO.Check INDOUS.BO's competition here
RCF.BO vs BHARATAGRI.BO Comparison June 2026
RCF.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.BO stands at 75.4B. In comparison, BHARATAGRI.BO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.BO is priced at ₹136.75, while BHARATAGRI.BO trades at ₹28.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas BHARATAGRI.BO's P/E ratio is -30.19. In terms of profitability, RCF.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BHARATAGRI.BO's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.BO is less volatile compared to BHARATAGRI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.BO.Check BHARATAGRI.BO's competition here