Narmada Agrobase Limited (NARMADA.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

NARMADA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NARMADA.NS stands at 1.7B. In comparison, FACT.NS has a market cap of 583.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NARMADA.NS is priced at ₹36.58, while FACT.NS trades at ₹885.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NARMADA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.71, whereas FACT.NS's P/E ratio is -1477.62. In terms of profitability, NARMADA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FACT.NS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NARMADA.NS is more volatile compared to FACT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NARMADA.NS.Check FACT.NS's competition here

NARMADA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NARMADA.NS stands at 1.7B. In comparison, FACT.BO has a market cap of 582.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NARMADA.NS is priced at ₹36.58, while FACT.BO trades at ₹885.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NARMADA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.71, whereas FACT.BO's P/E ratio is -1474.67. In terms of profitability, NARMADA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FACT.BO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NARMADA.NS is more volatile compared to FACT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NARMADA.NS.Check FACT.BO's competition here

NARMADA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NARMADA.NS stands at 1.7B. In comparison, COROMANDEL.NS has a market cap of 553.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NARMADA.NS is priced at ₹36.58, while COROMANDEL.NS trades at ₹1,861.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NARMADA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.71, whereas COROMANDEL.NS's P/E ratio is 28.34. In terms of profitability, NARMADA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to COROMANDEL.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NARMADA.NS is more volatile compared to COROMANDEL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NARMADA.NS.Check COROMANDEL.NS's competition here

NARMADA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NARMADA.NS stands at 1.7B. In comparison, COROMANDEL.BO has a market cap of 553.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NARMADA.NS is priced at ₹36.58, while COROMANDEL.BO trades at ₹1,861.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NARMADA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.71, whereas COROMANDEL.BO's P/E ratio is 28.36. In terms of profitability, NARMADA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to COROMANDEL.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NARMADA.NS is more volatile compared to COROMANDEL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NARMADA.NS.Check COROMANDEL.BO's competition here

NARMADA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NARMADA.NS stands at 1.7B. In comparison, UPL.BO has a market cap of 515.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NARMADA.NS is priced at ₹36.58, while UPL.BO trades at ₹596.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NARMADA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.71, whereas UPL.BO's P/E ratio is 27.40. In terms of profitability, NARMADA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to UPL.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NARMADA.NS is more volatile compared to UPL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NARMADA.NS.Check UPL.BO's competition here

NARMADA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NARMADA.NS stands at 1.7B. In comparison, UPL.NS has a market cap of 515.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NARMADA.NS is priced at ₹36.58, while UPL.NS trades at ₹596.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NARMADA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.71, whereas UPL.NS's P/E ratio is 27.36. In terms of profitability, NARMADA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to UPL.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NARMADA.NS is more volatile compared to UPL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NARMADA.NS.Check UPL.NS's competition here

NARMADA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NARMADA.NS stands at 1.7B. In comparison, PIIND.BO has a market cap of 425.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NARMADA.NS is priced at ₹36.58, while PIIND.BO trades at ₹2,781.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NARMADA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.71, whereas PIIND.BO's P/E ratio is 32.20. In terms of profitability, NARMADA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PIIND.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NARMADA.NS is more volatile compared to PIIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NARMADA.NS.Check PIIND.BO's competition here

NARMADA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NARMADA.NS stands at 1.7B. In comparison, PIIND.NS has a market cap of 425.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NARMADA.NS is priced at ₹36.58, while PIIND.NS trades at ₹2,780.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NARMADA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.71, whereas PIIND.NS's P/E ratio is 32.28. In terms of profitability, NARMADA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PIIND.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NARMADA.NS is more volatile compared to PIIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NARMADA.NS.Check PIIND.NS's competition here

NARMADA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NARMADA.NS stands at 1.7B. In comparison, SUMICHEM.BO has a market cap of 228.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NARMADA.NS is priced at ₹36.58, while SUMICHEM.BO trades at ₹448.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NARMADA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.71, whereas SUMICHEM.BO's P/E ratio is 41.99. In terms of profitability, NARMADA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SUMICHEM.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NARMADA.NS is more volatile compared to SUMICHEM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NARMADA.NS.Check SUMICHEM.BO's competition here

NARMADA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NARMADA.NS stands at 1.7B. In comparison, SUMICHEM.NS has a market cap of 227.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NARMADA.NS is priced at ₹36.58, while SUMICHEM.NS trades at ₹447.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NARMADA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.71, whereas SUMICHEM.NS's P/E ratio is 42.05. In terms of profitability, NARMADA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SUMICHEM.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NARMADA.NS is more volatile compared to SUMICHEM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NARMADA.NS.Check SUMICHEM.NS's competition here

NARMADA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NARMADA.NS stands at 1.7B. In comparison, BAYERCROP.NS has a market cap of 193.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NARMADA.NS is priced at ₹36.58, while BAYERCROP.NS trades at ₹4,258.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NARMADA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.71, whereas BAYERCROP.NS's P/E ratio is 28.02. In terms of profitability, NARMADA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BAYERCROP.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, NARMADA.NS is more volatile compared to BAYERCROP.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NARMADA.NS.Check BAYERCROP.NS's competition here

NARMADA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NARMADA.NS stands at 1.7B. In comparison, BAYERCROP.BO has a market cap of 192.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NARMADA.NS is priced at ₹36.58, while BAYERCROP.BO trades at ₹4,259.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NARMADA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.71, whereas BAYERCROP.BO's P/E ratio is 28.04. In terms of profitability, NARMADA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BAYERCROP.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, NARMADA.NS is more volatile compared to BAYERCROP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NARMADA.NS.Check BAYERCROP.BO's competition here

NARMADA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NARMADA.NS stands at 1.7B. In comparison, CHAMBLFERT.BO has a market cap of 191.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NARMADA.NS is priced at ₹36.58, while CHAMBLFERT.BO trades at ₹471.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NARMADA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.71, whereas CHAMBLFERT.BO's P/E ratio is 10.28. In terms of profitability, NARMADA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CHAMBLFERT.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NARMADA.NS is more volatile compared to CHAMBLFERT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NARMADA.NS.Check CHAMBLFERT.BO's competition here

NARMADA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NARMADA.NS stands at 1.7B. In comparison, CHAMBLFERT.NS has a market cap of 191.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NARMADA.NS is priced at ₹36.58, while CHAMBLFERT.NS trades at ₹471.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NARMADA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.71, whereas CHAMBLFERT.NS's P/E ratio is 9.79. In terms of profitability, NARMADA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CHAMBLFERT.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NARMADA.NS is more volatile compared to CHAMBLFERT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NARMADA.NS.Check CHAMBLFERT.NS's competition here

NARMADA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NARMADA.NS stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ATUL7.BO has a market cap of 179B. Regarding current trading prices, NARMADA.NS is priced at ₹36.58, while ATUL7.BO trades at ₹7,100.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NARMADA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.71, whereas ATUL7.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NARMADA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ATUL7.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NARMADA.NS is more volatile compared to ATUL7.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NARMADA.NS.Check ATUL7.BO's competition here

NARMADA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NARMADA.NS stands at 1.7B. In comparison, EIDPARRY.NS has a market cap of 128.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NARMADA.NS is priced at ₹36.58, while EIDPARRY.NS trades at ₹710.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NARMADA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.71, whereas EIDPARRY.NS's P/E ratio is 10.83. In terms of profitability, NARMADA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to EIDPARRY.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NARMADA.NS is more volatile compared to EIDPARRY.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NARMADA.NS.Check EIDPARRY.NS's competition here

NARMADA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NARMADA.NS stands at 1.7B. In comparison, EIDPARRY.BO has a market cap of 128.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NARMADA.NS is priced at ₹36.58, while EIDPARRY.BO trades at ₹710.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NARMADA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.71, whereas EIDPARRY.BO's P/E ratio is 11.17. In terms of profitability, NARMADA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to EIDPARRY.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NARMADA.NS is more volatile compared to EIDPARRY.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NARMADA.NS.Check EIDPARRY.BO's competition here

NARMADA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NARMADA.NS stands at 1.7B. In comparison, PARADEEP.BO has a market cap of 101.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NARMADA.NS is priced at ₹36.58, while PARADEEP.BO trades at ₹121.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NARMADA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.71, whereas PARADEEP.BO's P/E ratio is 12.91. In terms of profitability, NARMADA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PARADEEP.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NARMADA.NS is more volatile compared to PARADEEP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NARMADA.NS.Check PARADEEP.BO's competition here

NARMADA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NARMADA.NS stands at 1.7B. In comparison, PARADEEP.NS has a market cap of 101.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NARMADA.NS is priced at ₹36.58, while PARADEEP.NS trades at ₹121.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NARMADA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.71, whereas PARADEEP.NS's P/E ratio is 12.91. In terms of profitability, NARMADA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PARADEEP.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NARMADA.NS is more volatile compared to PARADEEP.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NARMADA.NS.Check PARADEEP.NS's competition here

NARMADA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NARMADA.NS stands at 1.7B. In comparison, SHARDACROP.NS has a market cap of 81.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NARMADA.NS is priced at ₹36.58, while SHARDACROP.NS trades at ₹885.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NARMADA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.71, whereas SHARDACROP.NS's P/E ratio is 11.96. In terms of profitability, NARMADA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SHARDACROP.NS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, NARMADA.NS is more volatile compared to SHARDACROP.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NARMADA.NS.Check SHARDACROP.NS's competition here

NARMADA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NARMADA.NS stands at 1.7B. In comparison, SHARDACROP.BO has a market cap of 80.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NARMADA.NS is priced at ₹36.58, while SHARDACROP.BO trades at ₹884.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NARMADA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.71, whereas SHARDACROP.BO's P/E ratio is 11.83. In terms of profitability, NARMADA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SHARDACROP.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, NARMADA.NS is more volatile compared to SHARDACROP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NARMADA.NS.Check SHARDACROP.BO's competition here

NARMADA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NARMADA.NS stands at 1.7B. In comparison, RCF.BO has a market cap of 69.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NARMADA.NS is priced at ₹36.58, while RCF.BO trades at ₹122.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NARMADA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.71, whereas RCF.BO's P/E ratio is 16.23. In terms of profitability, NARMADA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RCF.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NARMADA.NS is more volatile compared to RCF.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NARMADA.NS.Check RCF.BO's competition here

NARMADA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NARMADA.NS stands at 1.7B. In comparison, RCF.NS has a market cap of 69.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NARMADA.NS is priced at ₹36.58, while RCF.NS trades at ₹123.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NARMADA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.71, whereas RCF.NS's P/E ratio is 16.19. In terms of profitability, NARMADA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RCF.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NARMADA.NS is more volatile compared to RCF.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NARMADA.NS.Check RCF.NS's competition here

NARMADA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NARMADA.NS stands at 1.7B. In comparison, GSFC.NS has a market cap of 65B. Regarding current trading prices, NARMADA.NS is priced at ₹36.58, while GSFC.NS trades at ₹161.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NARMADA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.71, whereas GSFC.NS's P/E ratio is 9.66. In terms of profitability, NARMADA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GSFC.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NARMADA.NS is more volatile compared to GSFC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NARMADA.NS.Check GSFC.NS's competition here

NARMADA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NARMADA.NS stands at 1.7B. In comparison, GSFC.BO has a market cap of 64.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NARMADA.NS is priced at ₹36.58, while GSFC.BO trades at ₹161.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NARMADA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.71, whereas GSFC.BO's P/E ratio is 9.73. In terms of profitability, NARMADA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GSFC.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NARMADA.NS is more volatile compared to GSFC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NARMADA.NS.Check GSFC.BO's competition here

NARMADA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NARMADA.NS stands at 1.7B. In comparison, PICCADIL.BO has a market cap of 56.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NARMADA.NS is priced at ₹36.58, while PICCADIL.BO trades at ₹573.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NARMADA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.71, whereas PICCADIL.BO's P/E ratio is 40.61. In terms of profitability, NARMADA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PICCADIL.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NARMADA.NS is more volatile compared to PICCADIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NARMADA.NS.Check PICCADIL.BO's competition here

NARMADA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NARMADA.NS stands at 1.7B. In comparison, MBAPL.NS has a market cap of 48.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NARMADA.NS is priced at ₹36.58, while MBAPL.NS trades at ₹559.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NARMADA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.71, whereas MBAPL.NS's P/E ratio is 32.47. In terms of profitability, NARMADA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MBAPL.NS's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, NARMADA.NS is more volatile compared to MBAPL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NARMADA.NS.Check MBAPL.NS's competition here

NARMADA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NARMADA.NS stands at 1.7B. In comparison, DHANUKA.NS has a market cap of 47.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NARMADA.NS is priced at ₹36.58, while DHANUKA.NS trades at ₹1,053.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NARMADA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.71, whereas DHANUKA.NS's P/E ratio is 16.69. In terms of profitability, NARMADA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DHANUKA.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NARMADA.NS is more volatile compared to DHANUKA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NARMADA.NS.Check DHANUKA.NS's competition here

NARMADA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NARMADA.NS stands at 1.7B. In comparison, DHANUKA.BO has a market cap of 47.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NARMADA.NS is priced at ₹36.58, while DHANUKA.BO trades at ₹1,062.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NARMADA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.71, whereas DHANUKA.BO's P/E ratio is 16.56. In terms of profitability, NARMADA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DHANUKA.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NARMADA.NS is more volatile compared to DHANUKA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NARMADA.NS.Check DHANUKA.BO's competition here

NARMADA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NARMADA.NS stands at 1.7B. In comparison, KSCL.NS has a market cap of 45.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NARMADA.NS is priced at ₹36.58, while KSCL.NS trades at ₹868.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NARMADA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.71, whereas KSCL.NS's P/E ratio is 15.39. In terms of profitability, NARMADA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KSCL.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NARMADA.NS is more volatile compared to KSCL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NARMADA.NS.Check KSCL.NS's competition here

NARMADA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NARMADA.NS stands at 1.7B. In comparison, KSCL.BO has a market cap of 44.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NARMADA.NS is priced at ₹36.58, while KSCL.BO trades at ₹871.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NARMADA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.71, whereas KSCL.BO's P/E ratio is 15.34. In terms of profitability, NARMADA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KSCL.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NARMADA.NS is more volatile compared to KSCL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NARMADA.NS.Check KSCL.BO's competition here

NARMADA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NARMADA.NS stands at 1.7B. In comparison, RALLIS.BO has a market cap of 44.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NARMADA.NS is priced at ₹36.58, while RALLIS.BO trades at ₹225.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NARMADA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.71, whereas RALLIS.BO's P/E ratio is 26.49. In terms of profitability, NARMADA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RALLIS.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NARMADA.NS is more volatile compared to RALLIS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NARMADA.NS.Check RALLIS.BO's competition here

NARMADA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NARMADA.NS stands at 1.7B. In comparison, RALLIS.NS has a market cap of 44.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NARMADA.NS is priced at ₹36.58, while RALLIS.NS trades at ₹224.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NARMADA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.71, whereas RALLIS.NS's P/E ratio is 24.02. In terms of profitability, NARMADA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RALLIS.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NARMADA.NS is more volatile compared to RALLIS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NARMADA.NS.Check RALLIS.NS's competition here

NARMADA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NARMADA.NS stands at 1.7B. In comparison, KRISHANA.NS has a market cap of 41.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NARMADA.NS is priced at ₹36.58, while KRISHANA.NS trades at ₹668.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NARMADA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.71, whereas KRISHANA.NS's P/E ratio is 22.83. In terms of profitability, NARMADA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KRISHANA.NS's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, NARMADA.NS is more volatile compared to KRISHANA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NARMADA.NS.Check KRISHANA.NS's competition here

NARMADA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NARMADA.NS stands at 1.7B. In comparison, CIANAGRO.BO has a market cap of 39B. Regarding current trading prices, NARMADA.NS is priced at ₹36.58, while CIANAGRO.BO trades at ₹1,385.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NARMADA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.71, whereas CIANAGRO.BO's P/E ratio is 34.65. In terms of profitability, NARMADA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CIANAGRO.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NARMADA.NS is more volatile compared to CIANAGRO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NARMADA.NS.Check CIANAGRO.BO's competition here

NARMADA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NARMADA.NS stands at 1.7B. In comparison, NFL.NS has a market cap of 37B. Regarding current trading prices, NARMADA.NS is priced at ₹36.58, while NFL.NS trades at ₹74.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NARMADA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.71, whereas NFL.NS's P/E ratio is 17.50. In terms of profitability, NARMADA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NFL.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NARMADA.NS is more volatile compared to NFL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NARMADA.NS.Check NFL.NS's competition here

NARMADA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NARMADA.NS stands at 1.7B. In comparison, NFL.BO has a market cap of 36.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NARMADA.NS is priced at ₹36.58, while NFL.BO trades at ₹74.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NARMADA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.71, whereas NFL.BO's P/E ratio is 17.48. In terms of profitability, NARMADA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NFL.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NARMADA.NS is more volatile compared to NFL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NARMADA.NS.Check NFL.BO's competition here

NARMADA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NARMADA.NS stands at 1.7B. In comparison, MANGCHEFER.NS has a market cap of 36.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NARMADA.NS is priced at ₹36.58, while MANGCHEFER.NS trades at ₹308.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NARMADA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.71, whereas MANGCHEFER.NS's P/E ratio is 22.67. In terms of profitability, NARMADA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MANGCHEFER.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NARMADA.NS is more volatile compared to MANGCHEFER.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NARMADA.NS.Check MANGCHEFER.NS's competition here

NARMADA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NARMADA.NS stands at 1.7B. In comparison, MANGCHEFER.BO has a market cap of 36.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NARMADA.NS is priced at ₹36.58, while MANGCHEFER.BO trades at ₹308.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NARMADA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.71, whereas MANGCHEFER.BO's P/E ratio is 22.63. In terms of profitability, NARMADA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MANGCHEFER.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NARMADA.NS is more volatile compared to MANGCHEFER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NARMADA.NS.Check MANGCHEFER.BO's competition here

NARMADA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NARMADA.NS stands at 1.7B. In comparison, BNHOLDINGS.BO has a market cap of 34.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NARMADA.NS is priced at ₹36.58, while BNHOLDINGS.BO trades at ₹355.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NARMADA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.71, whereas BNHOLDINGS.BO's P/E ratio is 26.71. In terms of profitability, NARMADA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BNHOLDINGS.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NARMADA.NS is more volatile compared to BNHOLDINGS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NARMADA.NS.Check BNHOLDINGS.BO's competition here

NARMADA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NARMADA.NS stands at 1.7B. In comparison, BHAGCHEM.NS has a market cap of 34.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NARMADA.NS is priced at ₹36.58, while BHAGCHEM.NS trades at ₹265.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NARMADA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.71, whereas BHAGCHEM.NS's P/E ratio is 243.35. In terms of profitability, NARMADA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BHAGCHEM.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NARMADA.NS is more volatile compared to BHAGCHEM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NARMADA.NS.Check BHAGCHEM.NS's competition here

NARMADA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NARMADA.NS stands at 1.7B. In comparison, BHAGCHEM.BO has a market cap of 33.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NARMADA.NS is priced at ₹36.58, while BHAGCHEM.BO trades at ₹265.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NARMADA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.71, whereas BHAGCHEM.BO's P/E ratio is 235.81. In terms of profitability, NARMADA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BHAGCHEM.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NARMADA.NS is more volatile compared to BHAGCHEM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NARMADA.NS.Check BHAGCHEM.BO's competition here

NARMADA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NARMADA.NS stands at 1.7B. In comparison, NACLIND.BO has a market cap of 32.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NARMADA.NS is priced at ₹36.58, while NACLIND.BO trades at ₹161.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NARMADA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.71, whereas NACLIND.BO's P/E ratio is 826.25. In terms of profitability, NARMADA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NACLIND.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NARMADA.NS is more volatile compared to NACLIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NARMADA.NS.Check NACLIND.BO's competition here

NARMADA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NARMADA.NS stands at 1.7B. In comparison, NACLIND.NS has a market cap of 32.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NARMADA.NS is priced at ₹36.58, while NACLIND.NS trades at ₹161.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NARMADA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.71, whereas NACLIND.NS's P/E ratio is 824.95. In terms of profitability, NARMADA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NACLIND.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NARMADA.NS is more volatile compared to NACLIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NARMADA.NS.Check NACLIND.NS's competition here

NARMADA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NARMADA.NS stands at 1.7B. In comparison, VENKYS.BO has a market cap of 24.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NARMADA.NS is priced at ₹36.58, while VENKYS.BO trades at ₹1,714.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NARMADA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.71, whereas VENKYS.BO's P/E ratio is -57.49. In terms of profitability, NARMADA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VENKYS.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NARMADA.NS is more volatile compared to VENKYS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NARMADA.NS.Check VENKYS.BO's competition here

NARMADA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NARMADA.NS stands at 1.7B. In comparison, KSE.NS has a market cap of 22.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NARMADA.NS is priced at ₹36.58, while KSE.NS trades at ₹697.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NARMADA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.71, whereas KSE.NS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NARMADA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KSE.NS's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, NARMADA.NS is more volatile compared to KSE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NARMADA.NS.Check KSE.NS's competition here

NARMADA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NARMADA.NS stands at 1.7B. In comparison, INSECTICID.NS has a market cap of 20.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NARMADA.NS is priced at ₹36.58, while INSECTICID.NS trades at ₹710.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NARMADA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.71, whereas INSECTICID.NS's P/E ratio is 14.78. In terms of profitability, NARMADA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to INSECTICID.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NARMADA.NS is more volatile compared to INSECTICID.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NARMADA.NS.Check INSECTICID.NS's competition here

NARMADA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NARMADA.NS stands at 1.7B. In comparison, INSECTICID.BO has a market cap of 20.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NARMADA.NS is priced at ₹36.58, while INSECTICID.BO trades at ₹707.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NARMADA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.71, whereas INSECTICID.BO's P/E ratio is 14.67. In terms of profitability, NARMADA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to INSECTICID.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NARMADA.NS is more volatile compared to INSECTICID.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NARMADA.NS.Check INSECTICID.BO's competition here

NARMADA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NARMADA.NS stands at 1.7B. In comparison, IPL.NS has a market cap of 18.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NARMADA.NS is priced at ₹36.58, while IPL.NS trades at ₹156.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NARMADA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.71, whereas IPL.NS's P/E ratio is 15.35. In terms of profitability, NARMADA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to IPL.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NARMADA.NS is more volatile compared to IPL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NARMADA.NS.Check IPL.NS's competition here

NARMADA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NARMADA.NS stands at 1.7B. In comparison, IPL.BO has a market cap of 18.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NARMADA.NS is priced at ₹36.58, while IPL.BO trades at ₹156.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NARMADA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.71, whereas IPL.BO's P/E ratio is 15.28. In terms of profitability, NARMADA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to IPL.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NARMADA.NS is more volatile compared to IPL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NARMADA.NS.Check IPL.BO's competition here

NARMADA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NARMADA.NS stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ASTEC.NS has a market cap of 17.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NARMADA.NS is priced at ₹36.58, while ASTEC.NS trades at ₹767.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NARMADA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.71, whereas ASTEC.NS's P/E ratio is -20.52. In terms of profitability, NARMADA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ASTEC.NS's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, NARMADA.NS is more volatile compared to ASTEC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NARMADA.NS.Check ASTEC.NS's competition here

NARMADA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NARMADA.NS stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ASTEC.BO has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NARMADA.NS is priced at ₹36.58, while ASTEC.BO trades at ₹768.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NARMADA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.71, whereas ASTEC.BO's P/E ratio is -20.40. In terms of profitability, NARMADA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ASTEC.BO's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, NARMADA.NS is more volatile compared to ASTEC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NARMADA.NS.Check ASTEC.BO's competition here

NARMADA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NARMADA.NS stands at 1.7B. In comparison, SPIC.BO has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NARMADA.NS is priced at ₹36.58, while SPIC.BO trades at ₹66.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NARMADA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.71, whereas SPIC.BO's P/E ratio is 7.40. In terms of profitability, NARMADA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SPIC.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NARMADA.NS is more volatile compared to SPIC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NARMADA.NS.Check SPIC.BO's competition here

NARMADA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NARMADA.NS stands at 1.7B. In comparison, SPIC.NS has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NARMADA.NS is priced at ₹36.58, while SPIC.NS trades at ₹66.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NARMADA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.71, whereas SPIC.NS's P/E ratio is 6.49. In terms of profitability, NARMADA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SPIC.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NARMADA.NS is more volatile compared to SPIC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NARMADA.NS.Check SPIC.NS's competition here

NARMADA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NARMADA.NS stands at 1.7B. In comparison, MOL.BO has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NARMADA.NS is priced at ₹36.58, while MOL.BO trades at ₹46.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NARMADA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.71, whereas MOL.BO's P/E ratio is 41.46. In terms of profitability, NARMADA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MOL.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NARMADA.NS is more volatile compared to MOL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NARMADA.NS.Check MOL.BO's competition here

NARMADA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NARMADA.NS stands at 1.7B. In comparison, MOL.NS has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NARMADA.NS is priced at ₹36.58, while MOL.NS trades at ₹46.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NARMADA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.71, whereas MOL.NS's P/E ratio is 41.27. In terms of profitability, NARMADA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MOL.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NARMADA.NS is more volatile compared to MOL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NARMADA.NS.Check MOL.NS's competition here

NARMADA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NARMADA.NS stands at 1.7B. In comparison, BHARATRAS.BO has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NARMADA.NS is priced at ₹36.58, while BHARATRAS.BO trades at ₹1,372.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NARMADA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.71, whereas BHARATRAS.BO's P/E ratio is 17.37. In terms of profitability, NARMADA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BHARATRAS.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NARMADA.NS is more volatile compared to BHARATRAS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NARMADA.NS.Check BHARATRAS.BO's competition here

NARMADA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NARMADA.NS stands at 1.7B. In comparison, BHARATRAS.NS has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NARMADA.NS is priced at ₹36.58, while BHARATRAS.NS trades at ₹1,377.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NARMADA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.71, whereas BHARATRAS.NS's P/E ratio is 3.95. In terms of profitability, NARMADA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BHARATRAS.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NARMADA.NS is more volatile compared to BHARATRAS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NARMADA.NS.Check BHARATRAS.NS's competition here

NARMADA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NARMADA.NS stands at 1.7B. In comparison, MADRASFERT.BO has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NARMADA.NS is priced at ₹36.58, while MADRASFERT.BO trades at ₹67.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NARMADA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.71, whereas MADRASFERT.BO's P/E ratio is 13.83. In terms of profitability, NARMADA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MADRASFERT.BO's ROE of +6.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NARMADA.NS is more volatile compared to MADRASFERT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NARMADA.NS.Check MADRASFERT.BO's competition here

NARMADA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NARMADA.NS stands at 1.7B. In comparison, MADRASFERT.NS has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NARMADA.NS is priced at ₹36.58, while MADRASFERT.NS trades at ₹67.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NARMADA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.71, whereas MADRASFERT.NS's P/E ratio is 13.61. In terms of profitability, NARMADA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MADRASFERT.NS's ROE of +6.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NARMADA.NS is more volatile compared to MADRASFERT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NARMADA.NS.Check MADRASFERT.NS's competition here

NARMADA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NARMADA.NS stands at 1.7B. In comparison, BSHSL.NS has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NARMADA.NS is priced at ₹36.58, while BSHSL.NS trades at ₹94.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NARMADA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.71, whereas BSHSL.NS's P/E ratio is 37.01. In terms of profitability, NARMADA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BSHSL.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, NARMADA.NS is more volatile compared to BSHSL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NARMADA.NS.Check BSHSL.NS's competition here

NARMADA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NARMADA.NS stands at 1.7B. In comparison, DHARMAJ.NS has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NARMADA.NS is priced at ₹36.58, while DHARMAJ.NS trades at ₹275.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NARMADA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.71, whereas DHARMAJ.NS's P/E ratio is 17.00. In terms of profitability, NARMADA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DHARMAJ.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NARMADA.NS is more volatile compared to DHARMAJ.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NARMADA.NS.Check DHARMAJ.NS's competition here

NARMADA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NARMADA.NS stands at 1.7B. In comparison, DHARMAJ.BO has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NARMADA.NS is priced at ₹36.58, while DHARMAJ.BO trades at ₹275.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NARMADA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.71, whereas DHARMAJ.BO's P/E ratio is 16.90. In terms of profitability, NARMADA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DHARMAJ.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NARMADA.NS is more volatile compared to DHARMAJ.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NARMADA.NS.Check DHARMAJ.BO's competition here

NARMADA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NARMADA.NS stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ZUARI.BO has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NARMADA.NS is priced at ₹36.58, while ZUARI.BO trades at ₹212.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NARMADA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.71, whereas ZUARI.BO's P/E ratio is 0.98. In terms of profitability, NARMADA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ZUARI.BO's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, NARMADA.NS is more volatile compared to ZUARI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NARMADA.NS.Check ZUARI.BO's competition here

NARMADA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NARMADA.NS stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ZUARI.NS has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NARMADA.NS is priced at ₹36.58, while ZUARI.NS trades at ₹211.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NARMADA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.71, whereas ZUARI.NS's P/E ratio is 0.98. In terms of profitability, NARMADA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ZUARI.NS's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, NARMADA.NS is more volatile compared to ZUARI.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NARMADA.NS.Check ZUARI.NS's competition here

NARMADA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NARMADA.NS stands at 1.7B. In comparison, BLUECLOUDS.BO has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NARMADA.NS is priced at ₹36.58, while BLUECLOUDS.BO trades at ₹18.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NARMADA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.71, whereas BLUECLOUDS.BO's P/E ratio is 15.71. In terms of profitability, NARMADA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BLUECLOUDS.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NARMADA.NS is more volatile compared to BLUECLOUDS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NARMADA.NS.Check BLUECLOUDS.BO's competition here

NARMADA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NARMADA.NS stands at 1.7B. In comparison, BAJAJST.BO has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NARMADA.NS is priced at ₹36.58, while BAJAJST.BO trades at ₹359.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NARMADA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.71, whereas BAJAJST.BO's P/E ratio is 20.45. In terms of profitability, NARMADA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BAJAJST.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NARMADA.NS is more volatile compared to BAJAJST.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NARMADA.NS.Check BAJAJST.BO's competition here

NARMADA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NARMADA.NS stands at 1.7B. In comparison, HERANBA.BO has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NARMADA.NS is priced at ₹36.58, while HERANBA.BO trades at ₹184.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NARMADA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.71, whereas HERANBA.BO's P/E ratio is -9.86. In terms of profitability, NARMADA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HERANBA.BO's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NARMADA.NS is more volatile compared to HERANBA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NARMADA.NS.Check HERANBA.BO's competition here

NARMADA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NARMADA.NS stands at 1.7B. In comparison, HERANBA.NS has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NARMADA.NS is priced at ₹36.58, while HERANBA.NS trades at ₹184.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NARMADA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.71, whereas HERANBA.NS's P/E ratio is -9.79. In terms of profitability, NARMADA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HERANBA.NS's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NARMADA.NS is more volatile compared to HERANBA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NARMADA.NS.Check HERANBA.NS's competition here

NARMADA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NARMADA.NS stands at 1.7B. In comparison, SHINDL.BO has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NARMADA.NS is priced at ₹36.58, while SHINDL.BO trades at ₹156.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NARMADA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.71, whereas SHINDL.BO's P/E ratio is 38.82. In terms of profitability, NARMADA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SHINDL.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NARMADA.NS is more volatile compared to SHINDL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NARMADA.NS.Check SHINDL.BO's competition here

NARMADA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NARMADA.NS stands at 1.7B. In comparison, KSE.BO has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NARMADA.NS is priced at ₹36.58, while KSE.BO trades at ₹189.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NARMADA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.71, whereas KSE.BO's P/E ratio is 7.23. In terms of profitability, NARMADA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KSE.BO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, NARMADA.NS is more volatile compared to KSE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NARMADA.NS.Check KSE.BO's competition here

NARMADA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NARMADA.NS stands at 1.7B. In comparison, BESTAGRO.NS has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NARMADA.NS is priced at ₹36.58, while BESTAGRO.NS trades at ₹15.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NARMADA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.71, whereas BESTAGRO.NS's P/E ratio is 63.00. In terms of profitability, NARMADA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BESTAGRO.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NARMADA.NS is more volatile compared to BESTAGRO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NARMADA.NS.Check BESTAGRO.NS's competition here

NARMADA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NARMADA.NS stands at 1.7B. In comparison, SVRL.BO has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NARMADA.NS is priced at ₹36.58, while SVRL.BO trades at ₹251.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NARMADA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.71, whereas SVRL.BO's P/E ratio is 14.54. In terms of profitability, NARMADA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SVRL.BO's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, NARMADA.NS is more volatile compared to SVRL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NARMADA.NS.Check SVRL.BO's competition here

NARMADA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NARMADA.NS stands at 1.7B. In comparison, BESTAGRO.BO has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NARMADA.NS is priced at ₹36.58, while BESTAGRO.BO trades at ₹15.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NARMADA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.71, whereas BESTAGRO.BO's P/E ratio is 62.40. In terms of profitability, NARMADA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BESTAGRO.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NARMADA.NS is more volatile compared to BESTAGRO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NARMADA.NS.Check BESTAGRO.BO's competition here

NARMADA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NARMADA.NS stands at 1.7B. In comparison, KHAICHEM.BO has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NARMADA.NS is priced at ₹36.58, while KHAICHEM.BO trades at ₹54.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NARMADA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.71, whereas KHAICHEM.BO's P/E ratio is 7.83. In terms of profitability, NARMADA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KHAICHEM.BO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, NARMADA.NS is more volatile compared to KHAICHEM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NARMADA.NS.Check KHAICHEM.BO's competition here

NARMADA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NARMADA.NS stands at 1.7B. In comparison, MODINATUR.BO has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NARMADA.NS is priced at ₹36.58, while MODINATUR.BO trades at ₹388.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NARMADA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.71, whereas MODINATUR.BO's P/E ratio is 10.71. In terms of profitability, NARMADA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MODINATUR.BO's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, NARMADA.NS is more volatile compared to MODINATUR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NARMADA.NS.Check MODINATUR.BO's competition here

NARMADA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NARMADA.NS stands at 1.7B. In comparison, KHAICHEM.NS has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NARMADA.NS is priced at ₹36.58, while KHAICHEM.NS trades at ₹54.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NARMADA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.71, whereas KHAICHEM.NS's P/E ratio is 7.73. In terms of profitability, NARMADA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KHAICHEM.NS's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, NARMADA.NS is more volatile compared to KHAICHEM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NARMADA.NS.Check KHAICHEM.NS's competition here

NARMADA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NARMADA.NS stands at 1.7B. In comparison, KNAGRI.NS has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NARMADA.NS is priced at ₹36.58, while KNAGRI.NS trades at ₹190.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NARMADA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.71, whereas KNAGRI.NS's P/E ratio is 12.90. In terms of profitability, NARMADA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KNAGRI.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NARMADA.NS is more volatile compared to KNAGRI.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NARMADA.NS.Check KNAGRI.NS's competition here

NARMADA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NARMADA.NS stands at 1.7B. In comparison, RAMAPHO.NS has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NARMADA.NS is priced at ₹36.58, while RAMAPHO.NS trades at ₹120.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NARMADA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.71, whereas RAMAPHO.NS's P/E ratio is 8.17. In terms of profitability, NARMADA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RAMAPHO.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NARMADA.NS is more volatile compared to RAMAPHO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NARMADA.NS.Check RAMAPHO.NS's competition here

NARMADA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NARMADA.NS stands at 1.7B. In comparison, RAMAPHO.BO has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NARMADA.NS is priced at ₹36.58, while RAMAPHO.BO trades at ₹121.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NARMADA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.71, whereas RAMAPHO.BO's P/E ratio is 8.10. In terms of profitability, NARMADA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RAMAPHO.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NARMADA.NS is more volatile compared to RAMAPHO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NARMADA.NS.Check RAMAPHO.BO's competition here

NARMADA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NARMADA.NS stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ARIES.BO has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NARMADA.NS is priced at ₹36.58, while ARIES.BO trades at ₹328.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NARMADA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.71, whereas ARIES.BO's P/E ratio is 9.95. In terms of profitability, NARMADA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ARIES.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NARMADA.NS is more volatile compared to ARIES.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NARMADA.NS.Check ARIES.BO's competition here

NARMADA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NARMADA.NS stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ARIES.NS has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NARMADA.NS is priced at ₹36.58, while ARIES.NS trades at ₹327.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NARMADA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.71, whereas ARIES.NS's P/E ratio is 9.91. In terms of profitability, NARMADA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ARIES.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NARMADA.NS is more volatile compared to ARIES.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NARMADA.NS.Check ARIES.NS's competition here

NARMADA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NARMADA.NS stands at 1.7B. In comparison, GOODRICKE.BO has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NARMADA.NS is priced at ₹36.58, while GOODRICKE.BO trades at ₹175.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NARMADA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.71, whereas GOODRICKE.BO's P/E ratio is 14.86. In terms of profitability, NARMADA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GOODRICKE.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NARMADA.NS is more volatile compared to GOODRICKE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NARMADA.NS.Check GOODRICKE.BO's competition here

NARMADA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NARMADA.NS stands at 1.7B. In comparison, MISHTANN.BO has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NARMADA.NS is priced at ₹36.58, while MISHTANN.BO trades at ₹3.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NARMADA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.71, whereas MISHTANN.BO's P/E ratio is 1.43. In terms of profitability, NARMADA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MISHTANN.BO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, NARMADA.NS is more volatile compared to MISHTANN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NARMADA.NS.Check MISHTANN.BO's competition here

NARMADA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NARMADA.NS stands at 1.7B. In comparison, IGCL.NS has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NARMADA.NS is priced at ₹36.58, while IGCL.NS trades at ₹56.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NARMADA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.71, whereas IGCL.NS's P/E ratio is 8.64. In terms of profitability, NARMADA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to IGCL.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NARMADA.NS is more volatile compared to IGCL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NARMADA.NS.Check IGCL.NS's competition here

NARMADA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NARMADA.NS stands at 1.7B. In comparison, NATHBIOGEN.BO has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NARMADA.NS is priced at ₹36.58, while NATHBIOGEN.BO trades at ₹168.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NARMADA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.71, whereas NATHBIOGEN.BO's P/E ratio is 8.10. In terms of profitability, NARMADA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NATHBIOGEN.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NARMADA.NS is more volatile compared to NATHBIOGEN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NARMADA.NS.Check NATHBIOGEN.BO's competition here

NARMADA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NARMADA.NS stands at 1.7B. In comparison, NATHBIOGEN.NS has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NARMADA.NS is priced at ₹36.58, while NATHBIOGEN.NS trades at ₹168.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NARMADA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.71, whereas NATHBIOGEN.NS's P/E ratio is 8.08. In terms of profitability, NARMADA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NATHBIOGEN.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NARMADA.NS is more volatile compared to NATHBIOGEN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NARMADA.NS.Check NATHBIOGEN.NS's competition here

NARMADA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NARMADA.NS stands at 1.7B. In comparison, KINGSINFR.BO has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NARMADA.NS is priced at ₹36.58, while KINGSINFR.BO trades at ₹127.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NARMADA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.71, whereas KINGSINFR.BO's P/E ratio is 19.27. In terms of profitability, NARMADA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KINGSINFR.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NARMADA.NS is more volatile compared to KINGSINFR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NARMADA.NS.Check KINGSINFR.BO's competition here

NARMADA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NARMADA.NS stands at 1.7B. In comparison, SBECSUG.BO has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, NARMADA.NS is priced at ₹36.58, while SBECSUG.BO trades at ₹66.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NARMADA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.71, whereas SBECSUG.BO's P/E ratio is 16.16. In terms of profitability, NARMADA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SBECSUG.BO's ROE of -1.29%. Regarding short-term risk, NARMADA.NS is more volatile compared to SBECSUG.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NARMADA.NS.Check SBECSUG.BO's competition here

NARMADA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NARMADA.NS stands at 1.7B. In comparison, HOACFOODS.NS has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NARMADA.NS is priced at ₹36.58, while HOACFOODS.NS trades at ₹618.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NARMADA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.71, whereas HOACFOODS.NS's P/E ratio is 91.29. In terms of profitability, NARMADA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HOACFOODS.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NARMADA.NS is more volatile compared to HOACFOODS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NARMADA.NS.Check HOACFOODS.NS's competition here

NARMADA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NARMADA.NS stands at 1.7B. In comparison, NOVAAGRI.NS has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NARMADA.NS is priced at ₹36.58, while NOVAAGRI.NS trades at ₹27.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NARMADA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.71, whereas NOVAAGRI.NS's P/E ratio is 19.68. In terms of profitability, NARMADA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NOVAAGRI.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NARMADA.NS is more volatile compared to NOVAAGRI.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NARMADA.NS.Check NOVAAGRI.NS's competition here

NARMADA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NARMADA.NS stands at 1.7B. In comparison, NAGAFERT.BO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NARMADA.NS is priced at ₹36.58, while NAGAFERT.BO trades at ₹3.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NARMADA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.71, whereas NAGAFERT.BO's P/E ratio is -8.09. In terms of profitability, NARMADA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NAGAFERT.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NARMADA.NS is more volatile compared to NAGAFERT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NARMADA.NS.Check NAGAFERT.BO's competition here

NARMADA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NARMADA.NS stands at 1.7B. In comparison, NAGAFERT.NS has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NARMADA.NS is priced at ₹36.58, while NAGAFERT.NS trades at ₹3.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NARMADA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.71, whereas NAGAFERT.NS's P/E ratio is -7.87. In terms of profitability, NARMADA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NAGAFERT.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NARMADA.NS is more volatile compared to NAGAFERT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NARMADA.NS.Check NAGAFERT.NS's competition here

NARMADA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NARMADA.NS stands at 1.7B. In comparison, RBS.NS has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, NARMADA.NS is priced at ₹36.58, while RBS.NS trades at ₹87.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NARMADA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.71, whereas RBS.NS's P/E ratio is 12.77. In terms of profitability, NARMADA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RBS.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NARMADA.NS is more volatile compared to RBS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NARMADA.NS.Check RBS.NS's competition here

NARMADA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NARMADA.NS stands at 1.7B. In comparison, VIJSOLX.BO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NARMADA.NS is priced at ₹36.58, while VIJSOLX.BO trades at ₹608.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NARMADA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.71, whereas VIJSOLX.BO's P/E ratio is 10.09. In terms of profitability, NARMADA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VIJSOLX.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NARMADA.NS is more volatile compared to VIJSOLX.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NARMADA.NS.Check VIJSOLX.BO's competition here

NARMADA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NARMADA.NS stands at 1.7B. In comparison, INDOUS.NS has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NARMADA.NS is priced at ₹36.58, while INDOUS.NS trades at ₹91.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NARMADA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.71, whereas INDOUS.NS's P/E ratio is 14.18. In terms of profitability, NARMADA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to INDOUS.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NARMADA.NS is more volatile compared to INDOUS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NARMADA.NS.Check INDOUS.NS's competition here

NARMADA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NARMADA.NS stands at 1.7B. In comparison, INDOUS.BO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NARMADA.NS is priced at ₹36.58, while INDOUS.BO trades at ₹92.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NARMADA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.71, whereas INDOUS.BO's P/E ratio is 13.76. In terms of profitability, NARMADA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to INDOUS.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NARMADA.NS is more volatile compared to INDOUS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NARMADA.NS.Check INDOUS.BO's competition here

NARMADA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NARMADA.NS stands at 1.7B. In comparison, EQUIPPP.NS has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NARMADA.NS is priced at ₹36.58, while EQUIPPP.NS trades at ₹17.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NARMADA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.71, whereas EQUIPPP.NS's P/E ratio is 95.50. In terms of profitability, NARMADA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to EQUIPPP.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NARMADA.NS is more volatile compared to EQUIPPP.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NARMADA.NS.Check EQUIPPP.NS's competition here

NARMADA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NARMADA.NS stands at 1.7B. In comparison, EQUIPPP.BO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NARMADA.NS is priced at ₹36.58, while EQUIPPP.BO trades at ₹17.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NARMADA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.71, whereas EQUIPPP.BO's P/E ratio is 95.61. In terms of profitability, NARMADA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to EQUIPPP.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NARMADA.NS is more volatile compared to EQUIPPP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NARMADA.NS.Check EQUIPPP.BO's competition here