Rashtriya Chemicals and Fertilizers Limited (RCF.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (RCF.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Agricultural Inputs Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RCF.NS | ₹136.97 | +0.23% | 75.6B | 17.67 | ₹7.75 | +1.69% |
| FACT.BO | ₹907.80 | +2.60% | 587.7B | -1464.19 | -₹0.62 | +0.04% |
| FACT.NS | ₹906.25 | +2.42% | 586.4B | -1461.69 | -₹0.62 | +0.04% |
| COROMANDEL.NS | ₹1,987.70 | -1.36% | 585.4B | 29.98 | ₹66.30 | +0.45% |
| COROMANDEL.BO | ₹1,984.15 | -1.51% | 584.5B | 29.94 | ₹66.28 | +0.45% |
| UPL.NS | ₹605.50 | -0.52% | 511.1B | 27.10 | ₹22.34 | +0.99% |
| UPL.BO | ₹605.25 | -0.39% | 510.1B | 27.14 | ₹22.30 | +0.99% |
| PIIND.NS | ₹2,805.60 | +0.07% | 425.6B | 32.17 | ₹87.20 | +0.53% |
| PIIND.BO | ₹2,805.20 | -0.01% | 425.3B | 32.23 | ₹87.04 | +0.53% |
| SUMICHEM.BO | ₹439.45 | -2.87% | 219.5B | 40.47 | ₹10.86 | +0.27% |
Stock Comparison
RCF.NS vs FACT.BO Comparison June 2026
RCF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.NS stands at 75.6B. In comparison, FACT.BO has a market cap of 587.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.NS is priced at ₹136.97, while FACT.BO trades at ₹907.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas FACT.BO's P/E ratio is -1464.19. In terms of profitability, RCF.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FACT.BO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.NS is less volatile compared to FACT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.NS.Check FACT.BO's competition here
RCF.NS vs FACT.NS Comparison June 2026
RCF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.NS stands at 75.6B. In comparison, FACT.NS has a market cap of 586.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.NS is priced at ₹136.97, while FACT.NS trades at ₹906.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas FACT.NS's P/E ratio is -1461.69. In terms of profitability, RCF.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FACT.NS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.NS is less volatile compared to FACT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.NS.Check FACT.NS's competition here
RCF.NS vs COROMANDEL.NS Comparison June 2026
RCF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.NS stands at 75.6B. In comparison, COROMANDEL.NS has a market cap of 585.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.NS is priced at ₹136.97, while COROMANDEL.NS trades at ₹1,987.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas COROMANDEL.NS's P/E ratio is 29.98. In terms of profitability, RCF.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to COROMANDEL.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.NS is less volatile compared to COROMANDEL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.NS.Check COROMANDEL.NS's competition here
RCF.NS vs COROMANDEL.BO Comparison June 2026
RCF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.NS stands at 75.6B. In comparison, COROMANDEL.BO has a market cap of 584.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.NS is priced at ₹136.97, while COROMANDEL.BO trades at ₹1,984.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas COROMANDEL.BO's P/E ratio is 29.94. In terms of profitability, RCF.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to COROMANDEL.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.NS is more volatile compared to COROMANDEL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.NS.Check COROMANDEL.BO's competition here
RCF.NS vs UPL.NS Comparison June 2026
RCF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.NS stands at 75.6B. In comparison, UPL.NS has a market cap of 511.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.NS is priced at ₹136.97, while UPL.NS trades at ₹605.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas UPL.NS's P/E ratio is 27.10. In terms of profitability, RCF.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to UPL.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.NS is more volatile compared to UPL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.NS.Check UPL.NS's competition here
RCF.NS vs UPL.BO Comparison June 2026
RCF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.NS stands at 75.6B. In comparison, UPL.BO has a market cap of 510.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.NS is priced at ₹136.97, while UPL.BO trades at ₹605.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas UPL.BO's P/E ratio is 27.14. In terms of profitability, RCF.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to UPL.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.NS is more volatile compared to UPL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.NS.Check UPL.BO's competition here
RCF.NS vs PIIND.NS Comparison June 2026
RCF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.NS stands at 75.6B. In comparison, PIIND.NS has a market cap of 425.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.NS is priced at ₹136.97, while PIIND.NS trades at ₹2,805.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas PIIND.NS's P/E ratio is 32.17. In terms of profitability, RCF.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PIIND.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.NS is more volatile compared to PIIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.NS.Check PIIND.NS's competition here
RCF.NS vs PIIND.BO Comparison June 2026
RCF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.NS stands at 75.6B. In comparison, PIIND.BO has a market cap of 425.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.NS is priced at ₹136.97, while PIIND.BO trades at ₹2,805.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas PIIND.BO's P/E ratio is 32.23. In terms of profitability, RCF.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PIIND.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.NS is more volatile compared to PIIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.NS.Check PIIND.BO's competition here
RCF.NS vs SUMICHEM.BO Comparison June 2026
RCF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.NS stands at 75.6B. In comparison, SUMICHEM.BO has a market cap of 219.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.NS is priced at ₹136.97, while SUMICHEM.BO trades at ₹439.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas SUMICHEM.BO's P/E ratio is 40.47. In terms of profitability, RCF.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SUMICHEM.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.NS is less volatile compared to SUMICHEM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.NS.Check SUMICHEM.BO's competition here
RCF.NS vs SUMICHEM.NS Comparison June 2026
RCF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.NS stands at 75.6B. In comparison, SUMICHEM.NS has a market cap of 219.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.NS is priced at ₹136.97, while SUMICHEM.NS trades at ₹438.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas SUMICHEM.NS's P/E ratio is 40.41. In terms of profitability, RCF.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SUMICHEM.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.NS is less volatile compared to SUMICHEM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.NS.Check SUMICHEM.NS's competition here
RCF.NS vs CHAMBLFERT.BO Comparison June 2026
RCF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.NS stands at 75.6B. In comparison, CHAMBLFERT.BO has a market cap of 195.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.NS is priced at ₹136.97, while CHAMBLFERT.BO trades at ₹487.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas CHAMBLFERT.BO's P/E ratio is 10.49. In terms of profitability, RCF.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CHAMBLFERT.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.NS is more volatile compared to CHAMBLFERT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.NS.Check CHAMBLFERT.BO's competition here
RCF.NS vs CHAMBLFERT.NS Comparison June 2026
RCF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.NS stands at 75.6B. In comparison, CHAMBLFERT.NS has a market cap of 195.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.NS is priced at ₹136.97, while CHAMBLFERT.NS trades at ₹487.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas CHAMBLFERT.NS's P/E ratio is 9.99. In terms of profitability, RCF.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CHAMBLFERT.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.NS is more volatile compared to CHAMBLFERT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.NS.Check CHAMBLFERT.NS's competition here
RCF.NS vs BAYERCROP.NS Comparison June 2026
RCF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.NS stands at 75.6B. In comparison, BAYERCROP.NS has a market cap of 187.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.NS is priced at ₹136.97, while BAYERCROP.NS trades at ₹4,178.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas BAYERCROP.NS's P/E ratio is 27.26. In terms of profitability, RCF.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BAYERCROP.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.NS is less volatile compared to BAYERCROP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.NS.Check BAYERCROP.NS's competition here
RCF.NS vs BAYERCROP.BO Comparison June 2026
RCF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.NS stands at 75.6B. In comparison, BAYERCROP.BO has a market cap of 186.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.NS is priced at ₹136.97, while BAYERCROP.BO trades at ₹4,178.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas BAYERCROP.BO's P/E ratio is 27.21. In terms of profitability, RCF.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BAYERCROP.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.NS is less volatile compared to BAYERCROP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.NS.Check BAYERCROP.BO's competition here
RCF.NS vs ATUL7.BO Comparison June 2026
RCF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.NS stands at 75.6B. In comparison, ATUL7.BO has a market cap of 179B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.NS is priced at ₹136.97, while ATUL7.BO trades at ₹7,100.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas ATUL7.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RCF.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ATUL7.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.NS is more volatile compared to ATUL7.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.NS.Check ATUL7.BO's competition here
RCF.NS vs EIDPARRY.NS Comparison June 2026
RCF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.NS stands at 75.6B. In comparison, EIDPARRY.NS has a market cap of 127.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.NS is priced at ₹136.97, while EIDPARRY.NS trades at ₹715.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas EIDPARRY.NS's P/E ratio is 22.44. In terms of profitability, RCF.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EIDPARRY.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.NS is more volatile compared to EIDPARRY.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.NS.Check EIDPARRY.NS's competition here
RCF.NS vs EIDPARRY.BO Comparison June 2026
RCF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.NS stands at 75.6B. In comparison, EIDPARRY.BO has a market cap of 127.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.NS is priced at ₹136.97, while EIDPARRY.BO trades at ₹716.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas EIDPARRY.BO's P/E ratio is 11.07. In terms of profitability, RCF.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EIDPARRY.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.NS is more volatile compared to EIDPARRY.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.NS.Check EIDPARRY.BO's competition here
RCF.NS vs PARADEEP.NS Comparison June 2026
RCF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.NS stands at 75.6B. In comparison, PARADEEP.NS has a market cap of 113.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.NS is priced at ₹136.97, while PARADEEP.NS trades at ₹138.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas PARADEEP.NS's P/E ratio is 14.49. In terms of profitability, RCF.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PARADEEP.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.NS is less volatile compared to PARADEEP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.NS.Check PARADEEP.NS's competition here
RCF.NS vs PARADEEP.BO Comparison June 2026
RCF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.NS stands at 75.6B. In comparison, PARADEEP.BO has a market cap of 113.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.NS is priced at ₹136.97, while PARADEEP.BO trades at ₹138.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas PARADEEP.BO's P/E ratio is 14.48. In terms of profitability, RCF.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PARADEEP.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.NS is less volatile compared to PARADEEP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.NS.Check PARADEEP.BO's competition here
RCF.NS vs SHARDACROP.NS Comparison June 2026
RCF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.NS stands at 75.6B. In comparison, SHARDACROP.NS has a market cap of 81.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.NS is priced at ₹136.97, while SHARDACROP.NS trades at ₹903.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas SHARDACROP.NS's P/E ratio is 11.96. In terms of profitability, RCF.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SHARDACROP.NS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.NS is more volatile compared to SHARDACROP.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.NS.Check SHARDACROP.NS's competition here
RCF.NS vs SHARDACROP.BO Comparison June 2026
RCF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.NS stands at 75.6B. In comparison, SHARDACROP.BO has a market cap of 81.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.NS is priced at ₹136.97, while SHARDACROP.BO trades at ₹903.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas SHARDACROP.BO's P/E ratio is 11.98. In terms of profitability, RCF.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SHARDACROP.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.NS is more volatile compared to SHARDACROP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.NS.Check SHARDACROP.BO's competition here
RCF.NS vs RCF.BO Comparison June 2026
RCF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.NS stands at 75.6B. In comparison, RCF.BO has a market cap of 75.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.NS is priced at ₹136.97, while RCF.BO trades at ₹136.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas RCF.BO's P/E ratio is 17.64. In terms of profitability, RCF.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RCF.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.NS is less volatile compared to RCF.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.NS.Check RCF.BO's competition here
RCF.NS vs GSFC.NS Comparison June 2026
RCF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.NS stands at 75.6B. In comparison, GSFC.NS has a market cap of 66.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.NS is priced at ₹136.97, while GSFC.NS trades at ₹166.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas GSFC.NS's P/E ratio is 9.89. In terms of profitability, RCF.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GSFC.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.NS is less volatile compared to GSFC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.NS.Check GSFC.NS's competition here
RCF.NS vs GSFC.BO Comparison June 2026
RCF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.NS stands at 75.6B. In comparison, GSFC.BO has a market cap of 66.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.NS is priced at ₹136.97, while GSFC.BO trades at ₹166.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas GSFC.BO's P/E ratio is 9.95. In terms of profitability, RCF.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GSFC.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.NS is less volatile compared to GSFC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.NS.Check GSFC.BO's competition here
RCF.NS vs PICCADIL.BO Comparison June 2026
RCF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.NS stands at 75.6B. In comparison, PICCADIL.BO has a market cap of 56.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.NS is priced at ₹136.97, while PICCADIL.BO trades at ₹577.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas PICCADIL.BO's P/E ratio is 40.68. In terms of profitability, RCF.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PICCADIL.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.NS is more volatile compared to PICCADIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.NS.Check PICCADIL.BO's competition here
RCF.NS vs CIANAGRO.BO Comparison June 2026
RCF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.NS stands at 75.6B. In comparison, CIANAGRO.BO has a market cap of 52.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.NS is priced at ₹136.97, while CIANAGRO.BO trades at ₹1,862.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas CIANAGRO.BO's P/E ratio is 46.34. In terms of profitability, RCF.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CIANAGRO.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.NS is less volatile compared to CIANAGRO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.NS.Check CIANAGRO.BO's competition here
RCF.NS vs DHANUKA.NS Comparison June 2026
RCF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.NS stands at 75.6B. In comparison, DHANUKA.NS has a market cap of 48.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.NS is priced at ₹136.97, while DHANUKA.NS trades at ₹1,071.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas DHANUKA.NS's P/E ratio is 16.84. In terms of profitability, RCF.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DHANUKA.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.NS is more volatile compared to DHANUKA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.NS.Check DHANUKA.NS's competition here
RCF.NS vs MBAPL.NS Comparison June 2026
RCF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.NS stands at 75.6B. In comparison, MBAPL.NS has a market cap of 48.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.NS is priced at ₹136.97, while MBAPL.NS trades at ₹555.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas MBAPL.NS's P/E ratio is 32.45. In terms of profitability, RCF.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MBAPL.NS's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.NS is less volatile compared to MBAPL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.NS.Check MBAPL.NS's competition here
RCF.NS vs KSCL.BO Comparison June 2026
RCF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.NS stands at 75.6B. In comparison, KSCL.BO has a market cap of 48.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.NS is priced at ₹136.97, while KSCL.BO trades at ₹943.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas KSCL.BO's P/E ratio is 16.57. In terms of profitability, RCF.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KSCL.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.NS is less volatile compared to KSCL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.NS.Check KSCL.BO's competition here
RCF.NS vs KSCL.NS Comparison June 2026
RCF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.NS stands at 75.6B. In comparison, KSCL.NS has a market cap of 48.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.NS is priced at ₹136.97, while KSCL.NS trades at ₹944.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas KSCL.NS's P/E ratio is 16.59. In terms of profitability, RCF.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KSCL.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.NS is less volatile compared to KSCL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.NS.Check KSCL.NS's competition here
RCF.NS vs DHANUKA.BO Comparison June 2026
RCF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.NS stands at 75.6B. In comparison, DHANUKA.BO has a market cap of 48.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.NS is priced at ₹136.97, while DHANUKA.BO trades at ₹1,073.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas DHANUKA.BO's P/E ratio is 16.85. In terms of profitability, RCF.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DHANUKA.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.NS is more volatile compared to DHANUKA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.NS.Check DHANUKA.BO's competition here
RCF.NS vs RALLIS.NS Comparison June 2026
RCF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.NS stands at 75.6B. In comparison, RALLIS.NS has a market cap of 45.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.NS is priced at ₹136.97, while RALLIS.NS trades at ₹233.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas RALLIS.NS's P/E ratio is 24.67. In terms of profitability, RCF.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RALLIS.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.NS is more volatile compared to RALLIS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.NS.Check RALLIS.NS's competition here
RCF.NS vs RALLIS.BO Comparison June 2026
RCF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.NS stands at 75.6B. In comparison, RALLIS.BO has a market cap of 45.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.NS is priced at ₹136.97, while RALLIS.BO trades at ₹233.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas RALLIS.BO's P/E ratio is 27.21. In terms of profitability, RCF.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RALLIS.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.NS is less volatile compared to RALLIS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.NS.Check RALLIS.BO's competition here
RCF.NS vs NACLIND.NS Comparison June 2026
RCF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.NS stands at 75.6B. In comparison, NACLIND.NS has a market cap of 42.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.NS is priced at ₹136.97, while NACLIND.NS trades at ₹215.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas NACLIND.NS's P/E ratio is 1027.76. In terms of profitability, RCF.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NACLIND.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.NS is less volatile compared to NACLIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.NS.Check NACLIND.NS's competition here
RCF.NS vs NACLIND.BO Comparison June 2026
RCF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.NS stands at 75.6B. In comparison, NACLIND.BO has a market cap of 42.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.NS is priced at ₹136.97, while NACLIND.BO trades at ₹215.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas NACLIND.BO's P/E ratio is 1027.38. In terms of profitability, RCF.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NACLIND.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.NS is less volatile compared to NACLIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.NS.Check NACLIND.BO's competition here
RCF.NS vs KRISHANA.NS Comparison June 2026
RCF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.NS stands at 75.6B. In comparison, KRISHANA.NS has a market cap of 42B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.NS is priced at ₹136.97, while KRISHANA.NS trades at ₹678.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas KRISHANA.NS's P/E ratio is 23.28. In terms of profitability, RCF.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KRISHANA.NS's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.NS is more volatile compared to KRISHANA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.NS.Check KRISHANA.NS's competition here
RCF.NS vs NFL.NS Comparison June 2026
RCF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.NS stands at 75.6B. In comparison, NFL.NS has a market cap of 38.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.NS is priced at ₹136.97, while NFL.NS trades at ₹78.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas NFL.NS's P/E ratio is 18.18. In terms of profitability, RCF.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NFL.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.NS is more volatile compared to NFL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.NS.Check NFL.NS's competition here
RCF.NS vs NFL.BO Comparison June 2026
RCF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.NS stands at 75.6B. In comparison, NFL.BO has a market cap of 38.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.NS is priced at ₹136.97, while NFL.BO trades at ₹78.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas NFL.BO's P/E ratio is 18.17. In terms of profitability, RCF.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NFL.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.NS is more volatile compared to NFL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.NS.Check NFL.BO's competition here
RCF.NS vs BHAGCHEM.NS Comparison June 2026
RCF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.NS stands at 75.6B. In comparison, BHAGCHEM.NS has a market cap of 37.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.NS is priced at ₹136.97, while BHAGCHEM.NS trades at ₹288.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas BHAGCHEM.NS's P/E ratio is 264.65. In terms of profitability, RCF.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BHAGCHEM.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.NS is less volatile compared to BHAGCHEM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.NS.Check BHAGCHEM.NS's competition here
RCF.NS vs BHAGCHEM.BO Comparison June 2026
RCF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.NS stands at 75.6B. In comparison, BHAGCHEM.BO has a market cap of 37.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.NS is priced at ₹136.97, while BHAGCHEM.BO trades at ₹288.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas BHAGCHEM.BO's P/E ratio is 259.95. In terms of profitability, RCF.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BHAGCHEM.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.NS is less volatile compared to BHAGCHEM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.NS.Check BHAGCHEM.BO's competition here
RCF.NS vs MANGCHEFER.NS Comparison June 2026
RCF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.NS stands at 75.6B. In comparison, MANGCHEFER.NS has a market cap of 36.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.NS is priced at ₹136.97, while MANGCHEFER.NS trades at ₹308.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas MANGCHEFER.NS's P/E ratio is 22.67. In terms of profitability, RCF.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MANGCHEFER.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.NS is less volatile compared to MANGCHEFER.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.NS.Check MANGCHEFER.NS's competition here
RCF.NS vs MANGCHEFER.BO Comparison June 2026
RCF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.NS stands at 75.6B. In comparison, MANGCHEFER.BO has a market cap of 36.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.NS is priced at ₹136.97, while MANGCHEFER.BO trades at ₹308.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas MANGCHEFER.BO's P/E ratio is 22.63. In terms of profitability, RCF.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MANGCHEFER.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.NS is less volatile compared to MANGCHEFER.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.NS.Check MANGCHEFER.BO's competition here
RCF.NS vs BNHOLDINGS.BO Comparison June 2026
RCF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.NS stands at 75.6B. In comparison, BNHOLDINGS.BO has a market cap of 34.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.NS is priced at ₹136.97, while BNHOLDINGS.BO trades at ₹355.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas BNHOLDINGS.BO's P/E ratio is 26.71. In terms of profitability, RCF.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BNHOLDINGS.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.NS is less volatile compared to BNHOLDINGS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.NS.Check BNHOLDINGS.BO's competition here
RCF.NS vs VENKYS.BO Comparison June 2026
RCF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.NS stands at 75.6B. In comparison, VENKYS.BO has a market cap of 24.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.NS is priced at ₹136.97, while VENKYS.BO trades at ₹1,714.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas VENKYS.BO's P/E ratio is -57.49. In terms of profitability, RCF.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VENKYS.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.NS is less volatile compared to VENKYS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.NS.Check VENKYS.BO's competition here
RCF.NS vs KSE.NS Comparison June 2026
RCF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.NS stands at 75.6B. In comparison, KSE.NS has a market cap of 22.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.NS is priced at ₹136.97, while KSE.NS trades at ₹697.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas KSE.NS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RCF.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KSE.NS's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.NS is more volatile compared to KSE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.NS.Check KSE.NS's competition here
RCF.NS vs INSECTICID.NS Comparison June 2026
RCF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.NS stands at 75.6B. In comparison, INSECTICID.NS has a market cap of 20B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.NS is priced at ₹136.97, while INSECTICID.NS trades at ₹688.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas INSECTICID.NS's P/E ratio is 14.37. In terms of profitability, RCF.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to INSECTICID.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.NS is less volatile compared to INSECTICID.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.NS.Check INSECTICID.NS's competition here
RCF.NS vs INSECTICID.BO Comparison June 2026
RCF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.NS stands at 75.6B. In comparison, INSECTICID.BO has a market cap of 20B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.NS is priced at ₹136.97, while INSECTICID.BO trades at ₹689.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas INSECTICID.BO's P/E ratio is 14.36. In terms of profitability, RCF.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to INSECTICID.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.NS is less volatile compared to INSECTICID.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.NS.Check INSECTICID.BO's competition here
RCF.NS vs IPL.NS Comparison June 2026
RCF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.NS stands at 75.6B. In comparison, IPL.NS has a market cap of 18.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.NS is priced at ₹136.97, while IPL.NS trades at ₹169.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas IPL.NS's P/E ratio is 15.40. In terms of profitability, RCF.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IPL.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.NS is less volatile compared to IPL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.NS.Check IPL.NS's competition here
RCF.NS vs IPL.BO Comparison June 2026
RCF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.NS stands at 75.6B. In comparison, IPL.BO has a market cap of 18.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.NS is priced at ₹136.97, while IPL.BO trades at ₹170.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas IPL.BO's P/E ratio is 15.35. In terms of profitability, RCF.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IPL.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.NS is less volatile compared to IPL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.NS.Check IPL.BO's competition here
RCF.NS vs ASTEC.BO Comparison June 2026
RCF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.NS stands at 75.6B. In comparison, ASTEC.BO has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.NS is priced at ₹136.97, while ASTEC.BO trades at ₹779.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas ASTEC.BO's P/E ratio is -20.64. In terms of profitability, RCF.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ASTEC.BO's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.NS is less volatile compared to ASTEC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.NS.Check ASTEC.BO's competition here
RCF.NS vs ASTEC.NS Comparison June 2026
RCF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.NS stands at 75.6B. In comparison, ASTEC.NS has a market cap of 17.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.NS is priced at ₹136.97, while ASTEC.NS trades at ₹777.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas ASTEC.NS's P/E ratio is -20.56. In terms of profitability, RCF.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ASTEC.NS's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.NS is less volatile compared to ASTEC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.NS.Check ASTEC.NS's competition here
RCF.NS vs SPIC.NS Comparison June 2026
RCF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.NS stands at 75.6B. In comparison, SPIC.NS has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.NS is priced at ₹136.97, while SPIC.NS trades at ₹71.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas SPIC.NS's P/E ratio is 6.85. In terms of profitability, RCF.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SPIC.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.NS is more volatile compared to SPIC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.NS.Check SPIC.NS's competition here
RCF.NS vs SPIC.BO Comparison June 2026
RCF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.NS stands at 75.6B. In comparison, SPIC.BO has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.NS is priced at ₹136.97, while SPIC.BO trades at ₹71.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas SPIC.BO's P/E ratio is 7.80. In terms of profitability, RCF.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SPIC.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.NS is more volatile compared to SPIC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.NS.Check SPIC.BO's competition here
RCF.NS vs MOL.NS Comparison June 2026
RCF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.NS stands at 75.6B. In comparison, MOL.NS has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.NS is priced at ₹136.97, while MOL.NS trades at ₹50.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas MOL.NS's P/E ratio is 44.91. In terms of profitability, RCF.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MOL.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.NS is less volatile compared to MOL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.NS.Check MOL.NS's competition here
RCF.NS vs MOL.BO Comparison June 2026
RCF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.NS stands at 75.6B. In comparison, MOL.BO has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.NS is priced at ₹136.97, while MOL.BO trades at ₹50.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas MOL.BO's P/E ratio is 44.94. In terms of profitability, RCF.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MOL.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.NS is less volatile compared to MOL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.NS.Check MOL.BO's competition here
RCF.NS vs MADRASFERT.NS Comparison June 2026
RCF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.NS stands at 75.6B. In comparison, MADRASFERT.NS has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.NS is priced at ₹136.97, while MADRASFERT.NS trades at ₹72.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas MADRASFERT.NS's P/E ratio is 14.45. In terms of profitability, RCF.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MADRASFERT.NS's ROE of +6.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.NS is more volatile compared to MADRASFERT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.NS.Check MADRASFERT.NS's competition here
RCF.NS vs BHARATRAS.NS Comparison June 2026
RCF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.NS stands at 75.6B. In comparison, BHARATRAS.NS has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.NS is priced at ₹136.97, while BHARATRAS.NS trades at ₹1,395.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas BHARATRAS.NS's P/E ratio is 3.98. In terms of profitability, RCF.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BHARATRAS.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.NS is less volatile compared to BHARATRAS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.NS.Check BHARATRAS.NS's competition here
RCF.NS vs MADRASFERT.BO Comparison June 2026
RCF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.NS stands at 75.6B. In comparison, MADRASFERT.BO has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.NS is priced at ₹136.97, while MADRASFERT.BO trades at ₹72.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas MADRASFERT.BO's P/E ratio is 14.44. In terms of profitability, RCF.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MADRASFERT.BO's ROE of +6.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.NS is more volatile compared to MADRASFERT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.NS.Check MADRASFERT.BO's competition here
RCF.NS vs BHARATRAS.BO Comparison June 2026
RCF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.NS stands at 75.6B. In comparison, BHARATRAS.BO has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.NS is priced at ₹136.97, while BHARATRAS.BO trades at ₹1,394.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas BHARATRAS.BO's P/E ratio is 17.39. In terms of profitability, RCF.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BHARATRAS.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.NS is more volatile compared to BHARATRAS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.NS.Check BHARATRAS.BO's competition here
RCF.NS vs ZUARI.BO Comparison June 2026
RCF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.NS stands at 75.6B. In comparison, ZUARI.BO has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.NS is priced at ₹136.97, while ZUARI.BO trades at ₹241.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas ZUARI.BO's P/E ratio is 1.10. In terms of profitability, RCF.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ZUARI.BO's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.NS is less volatile compared to ZUARI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.NS.Check ZUARI.BO's competition here
RCF.NS vs ZUARI.NS Comparison June 2026
RCF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.NS stands at 75.6B. In comparison, ZUARI.NS has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.NS is priced at ₹136.97, while ZUARI.NS trades at ₹241.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas ZUARI.NS's P/E ratio is 1.10. In terms of profitability, RCF.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ZUARI.NS's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.NS is less volatile compared to ZUARI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.NS.Check ZUARI.NS's competition here
RCF.NS vs BLUECLOUDS.BO Comparison June 2026
RCF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.NS stands at 75.6B. In comparison, BLUECLOUDS.BO has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.NS is priced at ₹136.97, while BLUECLOUDS.BO trades at ₹21.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas BLUECLOUDS.BO's P/E ratio is 19.15. In terms of profitability, RCF.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BLUECLOUDS.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.NS is less volatile compared to BLUECLOUDS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.NS.Check BLUECLOUDS.BO's competition here
RCF.NS vs BSHSL.NS Comparison June 2026
RCF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.NS stands at 75.6B. In comparison, BSHSL.NS has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.NS is priced at ₹136.97, while BSHSL.NS trades at ₹92.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas BSHSL.NS's P/E ratio is 36.41. In terms of profitability, RCF.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BSHSL.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.NS is more volatile compared to BSHSL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.NS.Check BSHSL.NS's competition here
RCF.NS vs DHARMAJ.BO Comparison June 2026
RCF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.NS stands at 75.6B. In comparison, DHARMAJ.BO has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.NS is priced at ₹136.97, while DHARMAJ.BO trades at ₹265.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas DHARMAJ.BO's P/E ratio is 16.38. In terms of profitability, RCF.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DHARMAJ.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.NS is less volatile compared to DHARMAJ.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.NS.Check DHARMAJ.BO's competition here
RCF.NS vs DHARMAJ.NS Comparison June 2026
RCF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.NS stands at 75.6B. In comparison, DHARMAJ.NS has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.NS is priced at ₹136.97, while DHARMAJ.NS trades at ₹263.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas DHARMAJ.NS's P/E ratio is 16.32. In terms of profitability, RCF.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DHARMAJ.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.NS is less volatile compared to DHARMAJ.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.NS.Check DHARMAJ.NS's competition here
RCF.NS vs BAJAJST.BO Comparison June 2026
RCF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.NS stands at 75.6B. In comparison, BAJAJST.BO has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.NS is priced at ₹136.97, while BAJAJST.BO trades at ₹408.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas BAJAJST.BO's P/E ratio is 22.67. In terms of profitability, RCF.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BAJAJST.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.NS is less volatile compared to BAJAJST.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.NS.Check BAJAJST.BO's competition here
RCF.NS vs HERANBA.BO Comparison June 2026
RCF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.NS stands at 75.6B. In comparison, HERANBA.BO has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.NS is priced at ₹136.97, while HERANBA.BO trades at ₹192.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas HERANBA.BO's P/E ratio is -10.07. In terms of profitability, RCF.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HERANBA.BO's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.NS is more volatile compared to HERANBA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.NS.Check HERANBA.BO's competition here
RCF.NS vs HERANBA.NS Comparison June 2026
RCF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.NS stands at 75.6B. In comparison, HERANBA.NS has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.NS is priced at ₹136.97, while HERANBA.NS trades at ₹192.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas HERANBA.NS's P/E ratio is -10.06. In terms of profitability, RCF.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HERANBA.NS's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.NS is less volatile compared to HERANBA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.NS.Check HERANBA.NS's competition here
RCF.NS vs SHINDL.BO Comparison June 2026
RCF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.NS stands at 75.6B. In comparison, SHINDL.BO has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.NS is priced at ₹136.97, while SHINDL.BO trades at ₹153.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas SHINDL.BO's P/E ratio is 37.63. In terms of profitability, RCF.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SHINDL.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.NS is less volatile compared to SHINDL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.NS.Check SHINDL.BO's competition here
RCF.NS vs KSE.BO Comparison June 2026
RCF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.NS stands at 75.6B. In comparison, KSE.BO has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.NS is priced at ₹136.97, while KSE.BO trades at ₹186.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas KSE.BO's P/E ratio is 7.09. In terms of profitability, RCF.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KSE.BO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.NS is less volatile compared to KSE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.NS.Check KSE.BO's competition here
RCF.NS vs BESTAGRO.NS Comparison June 2026
RCF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.NS stands at 75.6B. In comparison, BESTAGRO.NS has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.NS is priced at ₹136.97, while BESTAGRO.NS trades at ₹15.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas BESTAGRO.NS's P/E ratio is 63.36. In terms of profitability, RCF.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BESTAGRO.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.NS is less volatile compared to BESTAGRO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.NS.Check BESTAGRO.NS's competition here
RCF.NS vs KHAICHEM.BO Comparison June 2026
RCF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.NS stands at 75.6B. In comparison, KHAICHEM.BO has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.NS is priced at ₹136.97, while KHAICHEM.BO trades at ₹56.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas KHAICHEM.BO's P/E ratio is 8.00. In terms of profitability, RCF.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KHAICHEM.BO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.NS is less volatile compared to KHAICHEM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.NS.Check KHAICHEM.BO's competition here
RCF.NS vs BESTAGRO.BO Comparison June 2026
RCF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.NS stands at 75.6B. In comparison, BESTAGRO.BO has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.NS is priced at ₹136.97, while BESTAGRO.BO trades at ₹15.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas BESTAGRO.BO's P/E ratio is 63.52. In terms of profitability, RCF.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BESTAGRO.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.NS is more volatile compared to BESTAGRO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.NS.Check BESTAGRO.BO's competition here
RCF.NS vs KHAICHEM.NS Comparison June 2026
RCF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.NS stands at 75.6B. In comparison, KHAICHEM.NS has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.NS is priced at ₹136.97, while KHAICHEM.NS trades at ₹56.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas KHAICHEM.NS's P/E ratio is 8.03. In terms of profitability, RCF.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KHAICHEM.NS's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.NS is more volatile compared to KHAICHEM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.NS.Check KHAICHEM.NS's competition here
RCF.NS vs MODINATUR.BO Comparison June 2026
RCF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.NS stands at 75.6B. In comparison, MODINATUR.BO has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.NS is priced at ₹136.97, while MODINATUR.BO trades at ₹409.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas MODINATUR.BO's P/E ratio is 10.78. In terms of profitability, RCF.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MODINATUR.BO's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.NS is less volatile compared to MODINATUR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.NS.Check MODINATUR.BO's competition here
RCF.NS vs SVRL.BO Comparison June 2026
RCF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.NS stands at 75.6B. In comparison, SVRL.BO has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.NS is priced at ₹136.97, while SVRL.BO trades at ₹238.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas SVRL.BO's P/E ratio is 13.78. In terms of profitability, RCF.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SVRL.BO's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.NS is less volatile compared to SVRL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.NS.Check SVRL.BO's competition here
RCF.NS vs KNAGRI.NS Comparison June 2026
RCF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.NS stands at 75.6B. In comparison, KNAGRI.NS has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.NS is priced at ₹136.97, while KNAGRI.NS trades at ₹210.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas KNAGRI.NS's P/E ratio is 14.18. In terms of profitability, RCF.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KNAGRI.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.NS is less volatile compared to KNAGRI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.NS.Check KNAGRI.NS's competition here
RCF.NS vs RAMAPHO.BO Comparison June 2026
RCF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.NS stands at 75.6B. In comparison, RAMAPHO.BO has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.NS is priced at ₹136.97, while RAMAPHO.BO trades at ₹134.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas RAMAPHO.BO's P/E ratio is 9.05. In terms of profitability, RCF.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RAMAPHO.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.NS is less volatile compared to RAMAPHO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.NS.Check RAMAPHO.BO's competition here
RCF.NS vs RAMAPHO.NS Comparison June 2026
RCF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.NS stands at 75.6B. In comparison, RAMAPHO.NS has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.NS is priced at ₹136.97, while RAMAPHO.NS trades at ₹134.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas RAMAPHO.NS's P/E ratio is 9.06. In terms of profitability, RCF.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RAMAPHO.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.NS is less volatile compared to RAMAPHO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.NS.Check RAMAPHO.NS's competition here
RCF.NS vs ARIES.BO Comparison June 2026
RCF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.NS stands at 75.6B. In comparison, ARIES.BO has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.NS is priced at ₹136.97, while ARIES.BO trades at ₹331.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas ARIES.BO's P/E ratio is 10.06. In terms of profitability, RCF.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ARIES.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.NS is less volatile compared to ARIES.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.NS.Check ARIES.BO's competition here
RCF.NS vs ARIES.NS Comparison June 2026
RCF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.NS stands at 75.6B. In comparison, ARIES.NS has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.NS is priced at ₹136.97, while ARIES.NS trades at ₹332.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas ARIES.NS's P/E ratio is 10.09. In terms of profitability, RCF.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ARIES.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.NS is less volatile compared to ARIES.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.NS.Check ARIES.NS's competition here
RCF.NS vs MISHTANN.BO Comparison June 2026
RCF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.NS stands at 75.6B. In comparison, MISHTANN.BO has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.NS is priced at ₹136.97, while MISHTANN.BO trades at ₹3.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas MISHTANN.BO's P/E ratio is 1.62. In terms of profitability, RCF.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MISHTANN.BO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.NS is more volatile compared to MISHTANN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.NS.Check MISHTANN.BO's competition here
RCF.NS vs IGCL.NS Comparison June 2026
RCF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.NS stands at 75.6B. In comparison, IGCL.NS has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.NS is priced at ₹136.97, while IGCL.NS trades at ₹61.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas IGCL.NS's P/E ratio is 9.17. In terms of profitability, RCF.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IGCL.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.NS is less volatile compared to IGCL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.NS.Check IGCL.NS's competition here
RCF.NS vs GOODRICKE.BO Comparison June 2026
RCF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.NS stands at 75.6B. In comparison, GOODRICKE.BO has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.NS is priced at ₹136.97, while GOODRICKE.BO trades at ₹179.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas GOODRICKE.BO's P/E ratio is 15.22. In terms of profitability, RCF.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GOODRICKE.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.NS is more volatile compared to GOODRICKE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.NS.Check GOODRICKE.BO's competition here
RCF.NS vs SBECSUG.BO Comparison June 2026
RCF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.NS stands at 75.6B. In comparison, SBECSUG.BO has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.NS is priced at ₹136.97, while SBECSUG.BO trades at ₹76.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas SBECSUG.BO's P/E ratio is 19.56. In terms of profitability, RCF.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SBECSUG.BO's ROE of -1.29%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.NS is more volatile compared to SBECSUG.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.NS.Check SBECSUG.BO's competition here
RCF.NS vs NATHBIOGEN.NS Comparison June 2026
RCF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.NS stands at 75.6B. In comparison, NATHBIOGEN.NS has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.NS is priced at ₹136.97, while NATHBIOGEN.NS trades at ₹168.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas NATHBIOGEN.NS's P/E ratio is 8.02. In terms of profitability, RCF.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NATHBIOGEN.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.NS is less volatile compared to NATHBIOGEN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.NS.Check NATHBIOGEN.NS's competition here
RCF.NS vs NATHBIOGEN.BO Comparison June 2026
RCF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.NS stands at 75.6B. In comparison, NATHBIOGEN.BO has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.NS is priced at ₹136.97, while NATHBIOGEN.BO trades at ₹168.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas NATHBIOGEN.BO's P/E ratio is 8.04. In terms of profitability, RCF.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NATHBIOGEN.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.NS is less volatile compared to NATHBIOGEN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.NS.Check NATHBIOGEN.BO's competition here
RCF.NS vs KINGSINFR.BO Comparison June 2026
RCF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.NS stands at 75.6B. In comparison, KINGSINFR.BO has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.NS is priced at ₹136.97, while KINGSINFR.BO trades at ₹126.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas KINGSINFR.BO's P/E ratio is 19.20. In terms of profitability, RCF.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KINGSINFR.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.NS is less volatile compared to KINGSINFR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.NS.Check KINGSINFR.BO's competition here
RCF.NS vs HOACFOODS.NS Comparison June 2026
RCF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.NS stands at 75.6B. In comparison, HOACFOODS.NS has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.NS is priced at ₹136.97, while HOACFOODS.NS trades at ₹651.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas HOACFOODS.NS's P/E ratio is 96.16. In terms of profitability, RCF.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HOACFOODS.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.NS is more volatile compared to HOACFOODS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.NS.Check HOACFOODS.NS's competition here
RCF.NS vs NOVAAGRI.NS Comparison June 2026
RCF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.NS stands at 75.6B. In comparison, NOVAAGRI.NS has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.NS is priced at ₹136.97, while NOVAAGRI.NS trades at ₹25.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas NOVAAGRI.NS's P/E ratio is 17.87. In terms of profitability, RCF.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NOVAAGRI.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.NS is less volatile compared to NOVAAGRI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.NS.Check NOVAAGRI.NS's competition here
RCF.NS vs EQUIPPP.BO Comparison June 2026
RCF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.NS stands at 75.6B. In comparison, EQUIPPP.BO has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.NS is priced at ₹136.97, while EQUIPPP.BO trades at ₹21.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas EQUIPPP.BO's P/E ratio is 120.78. In terms of profitability, RCF.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EQUIPPP.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.NS is less volatile compared to EQUIPPP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.NS.Check EQUIPPP.BO's competition here
RCF.NS vs EQUIPPP.NS Comparison June 2026
RCF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.NS stands at 75.6B. In comparison, EQUIPPP.NS has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.NS is priced at ₹136.97, while EQUIPPP.NS trades at ₹21.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas EQUIPPP.NS's P/E ratio is 119.39. In terms of profitability, RCF.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EQUIPPP.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.NS is less volatile compared to EQUIPPP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.NS.Check EQUIPPP.NS's competition here
RCF.NS vs NAGAFERT.BO Comparison June 2026
RCF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.NS stands at 75.6B. In comparison, NAGAFERT.BO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.NS is priced at ₹136.97, while NAGAFERT.BO trades at ₹3.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas NAGAFERT.BO's P/E ratio is -7.26. In terms of profitability, RCF.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NAGAFERT.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.NS is more volatile compared to NAGAFERT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.NS.Check NAGAFERT.BO's competition here
RCF.NS vs NAGAFERT.NS Comparison June 2026
RCF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.NS stands at 75.6B. In comparison, NAGAFERT.NS has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.NS is priced at ₹136.97, while NAGAFERT.NS trades at ₹3.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas NAGAFERT.NS's P/E ratio is -7.28. In terms of profitability, RCF.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NAGAFERT.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.NS is more volatile compared to NAGAFERT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.NS.Check NAGAFERT.NS's competition here
RCF.NS vs RBS.NS Comparison June 2026
RCF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.NS stands at 75.6B. In comparison, RBS.NS has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.NS is priced at ₹136.97, while RBS.NS trades at ₹87.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas RBS.NS's P/E ratio is 12.68. In terms of profitability, RCF.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RBS.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.NS is less volatile compared to RBS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.NS.Check RBS.NS's competition here
RCF.NS vs VIJSOLX.BO Comparison June 2026
RCF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.NS stands at 75.6B. In comparison, VIJSOLX.BO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.NS is priced at ₹136.97, while VIJSOLX.BO trades at ₹607.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas VIJSOLX.BO's P/E ratio is 10.08. In terms of profitability, RCF.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VIJSOLX.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.NS is more volatile compared to VIJSOLX.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.NS.Check VIJSOLX.BO's competition here
RCF.NS vs INDOUS.NS Comparison June 2026
RCF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.NS stands at 75.6B. In comparison, INDOUS.NS has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.NS is priced at ₹136.97, while INDOUS.NS trades at ₹92.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas INDOUS.NS's P/E ratio is 13.95. In terms of profitability, RCF.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to INDOUS.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.NS is less volatile compared to INDOUS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.NS.Check INDOUS.NS's competition here
RCF.NS vs INDOUS.BO Comparison June 2026
RCF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.NS stands at 75.6B. In comparison, INDOUS.BO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.NS is priced at ₹136.97, while INDOUS.BO trades at ₹93.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas INDOUS.BO's P/E ratio is 13.80. In terms of profitability, RCF.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to INDOUS.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.NS is more volatile compared to INDOUS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.NS.Check INDOUS.BO's competition here
RCF.NS vs BHARATAGRI.BO Comparison June 2026
RCF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCF.NS stands at 75.6B. In comparison, BHARATAGRI.BO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RCF.NS is priced at ₹136.97, while BHARATAGRI.BO trades at ₹29.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.67, whereas BHARATAGRI.BO's P/E ratio is -30.81. In terms of profitability, RCF.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BHARATAGRI.BO's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RCF.NS is less volatile compared to BHARATAGRI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCF.NS.Check BHARATAGRI.BO's competition here