India Pesticides Limited (IPL.BO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (IPL.BO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Agricultural Inputs Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IPL.BO | ₹166.35 | -2.20% | 19.1B | 16.00 | ₹10.40 | +0.45% |
| COROMANDEL.BO | ₹1,993.65 | +0.48% | 588.2B | 30.08 | ₹66.28 | +0.45% |
| COROMANDEL.NS | ₹1,992.80 | +0.26% | 586.9B | 30.06 | ₹66.30 | +0.45% |
| FACT.NS | ₹892.85 | -1.48% | 577.7B | -1417.22 | -₹0.63 | +0.04% |
| FACT.BO | ₹892.45 | -1.69% | 577.7B | -1394.45 | -₹0.64 | +0.04% |
| UPL.NS | ₹596.80 | -1.44% | 503.8B | 26.71 | ₹22.34 | +1.01% |
| UPL.BO | ₹596.65 | -1.42% | 502.9B | 26.76 | ₹22.30 | +1.01% |
| PIIND.NS | ₹2,767.00 | -1.38% | 419.8B | 31.74 | ₹87.19 | +0.54% |
| PIIND.BO | ₹2,765.80 | -1.40% | 419.6B | 31.80 | ₹86.97 | +0.54% |
| SUMICHEM.NS | ₹433.65 | -1.20% | 216.5B | 39.93 | ₹10.86 | +0.28% |
Stock Comparison
IPL.BO vs COROMANDEL.BO Comparison June 2026
IPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPL.BO stands at 19.1B. In comparison, COROMANDEL.BO has a market cap of 588.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IPL.BO is priced at ₹166.35, while COROMANDEL.BO trades at ₹1,993.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.00, whereas COROMANDEL.BO's P/E ratio is 30.08. In terms of profitability, IPL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to COROMANDEL.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, IPL.BO is more volatile compared to COROMANDEL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPL.BO.Check COROMANDEL.BO's competition here
IPL.BO vs COROMANDEL.NS Comparison June 2026
IPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPL.BO stands at 19.1B. In comparison, COROMANDEL.NS has a market cap of 586.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IPL.BO is priced at ₹166.35, while COROMANDEL.NS trades at ₹1,992.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.00, whereas COROMANDEL.NS's P/E ratio is 30.06. In terms of profitability, IPL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to COROMANDEL.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, IPL.BO is more volatile compared to COROMANDEL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPL.BO.Check COROMANDEL.NS's competition here
IPL.BO vs FACT.NS Comparison June 2026
IPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPL.BO stands at 19.1B. In comparison, FACT.NS has a market cap of 577.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IPL.BO is priced at ₹166.35, while FACT.NS trades at ₹892.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.00, whereas FACT.NS's P/E ratio is -1417.22. In terms of profitability, IPL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FACT.NS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IPL.BO is more volatile compared to FACT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPL.BO.Check FACT.NS's competition here
IPL.BO vs FACT.BO Comparison June 2026
IPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPL.BO stands at 19.1B. In comparison, FACT.BO has a market cap of 577.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IPL.BO is priced at ₹166.35, while FACT.BO trades at ₹892.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.00, whereas FACT.BO's P/E ratio is -1394.45. In terms of profitability, IPL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FACT.BO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IPL.BO is more volatile compared to FACT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPL.BO.Check FACT.BO's competition here
IPL.BO vs UPL.NS Comparison June 2026
IPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPL.BO stands at 19.1B. In comparison, UPL.NS has a market cap of 503.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IPL.BO is priced at ₹166.35, while UPL.NS trades at ₹596.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.00, whereas UPL.NS's P/E ratio is 26.71. In terms of profitability, IPL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to UPL.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IPL.BO is more volatile compared to UPL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPL.BO.Check UPL.NS's competition here
IPL.BO vs UPL.BO Comparison June 2026
IPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPL.BO stands at 19.1B. In comparison, UPL.BO has a market cap of 502.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IPL.BO is priced at ₹166.35, while UPL.BO trades at ₹596.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.00, whereas UPL.BO's P/E ratio is 26.76. In terms of profitability, IPL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to UPL.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IPL.BO is more volatile compared to UPL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPL.BO.Check UPL.BO's competition here
IPL.BO vs PIIND.NS Comparison June 2026
IPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPL.BO stands at 19.1B. In comparison, PIIND.NS has a market cap of 419.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IPL.BO is priced at ₹166.35, while PIIND.NS trades at ₹2,767.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.00, whereas PIIND.NS's P/E ratio is 31.74. In terms of profitability, IPL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PIIND.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IPL.BO is more volatile compared to PIIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPL.BO.Check PIIND.NS's competition here
IPL.BO vs PIIND.BO Comparison June 2026
IPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPL.BO stands at 19.1B. In comparison, PIIND.BO has a market cap of 419.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IPL.BO is priced at ₹166.35, while PIIND.BO trades at ₹2,765.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.00, whereas PIIND.BO's P/E ratio is 31.80. In terms of profitability, IPL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PIIND.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IPL.BO is more volatile compared to PIIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPL.BO.Check PIIND.BO's competition here
IPL.BO vs SUMICHEM.NS Comparison June 2026
IPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPL.BO stands at 19.1B. In comparison, SUMICHEM.NS has a market cap of 216.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IPL.BO is priced at ₹166.35, while SUMICHEM.NS trades at ₹433.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.00, whereas SUMICHEM.NS's P/E ratio is 39.93. In terms of profitability, IPL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SUMICHEM.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, IPL.BO is more volatile compared to SUMICHEM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPL.BO.Check SUMICHEM.NS's competition here
IPL.BO vs SUMICHEM.BO Comparison June 2026
IPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPL.BO stands at 19.1B. In comparison, SUMICHEM.BO has a market cap of 216.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IPL.BO is priced at ₹166.35, while SUMICHEM.BO trades at ₹433.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.00, whereas SUMICHEM.BO's P/E ratio is 39.95. In terms of profitability, IPL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SUMICHEM.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, IPL.BO is more volatile compared to SUMICHEM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPL.BO.Check SUMICHEM.BO's competition here
IPL.BO vs CHAMBLFERT.NS Comparison June 2026
IPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPL.BO stands at 19.1B. In comparison, CHAMBLFERT.NS has a market cap of 192.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IPL.BO is priced at ₹166.35, while CHAMBLFERT.NS trades at ₹480.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.00, whereas CHAMBLFERT.NS's P/E ratio is 9.85. In terms of profitability, IPL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CHAMBLFERT.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, IPL.BO is more volatile compared to CHAMBLFERT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPL.BO.Check CHAMBLFERT.NS's competition here
IPL.BO vs CHAMBLFERT.BO Comparison June 2026
IPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPL.BO stands at 19.1B. In comparison, CHAMBLFERT.BO has a market cap of 192.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IPL.BO is priced at ₹166.35, while CHAMBLFERT.BO trades at ₹480.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.00, whereas CHAMBLFERT.BO's P/E ratio is 10.34. In terms of profitability, IPL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CHAMBLFERT.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, IPL.BO is more volatile compared to CHAMBLFERT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPL.BO.Check CHAMBLFERT.BO's competition here
IPL.BO vs BAYERCROP.NS Comparison June 2026
IPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPL.BO stands at 19.1B. In comparison, BAYERCROP.NS has a market cap of 188.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IPL.BO is priced at ₹166.35, while BAYERCROP.NS trades at ₹4,195.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.00, whereas BAYERCROP.NS's P/E ratio is 27.37. In terms of profitability, IPL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BAYERCROP.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, IPL.BO is more volatile compared to BAYERCROP.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPL.BO.Check BAYERCROP.NS's competition here
IPL.BO vs BAYERCROP.BO Comparison June 2026
IPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPL.BO stands at 19.1B. In comparison, BAYERCROP.BO has a market cap of 188.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IPL.BO is priced at ₹166.35, while BAYERCROP.BO trades at ₹4,193.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.00, whereas BAYERCROP.BO's P/E ratio is 27.34. In terms of profitability, IPL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BAYERCROP.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, IPL.BO is more volatile compared to BAYERCROP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPL.BO.Check BAYERCROP.BO's competition here
IPL.BO vs ATUL7.BO Comparison June 2026
IPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPL.BO stands at 19.1B. In comparison, ATUL7.BO has a market cap of 179B. Regarding current trading prices, IPL.BO is priced at ₹166.35, while ATUL7.BO trades at ₹7,100.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.00, whereas ATUL7.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IPL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ATUL7.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IPL.BO is more volatile compared to ATUL7.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPL.BO.Check ATUL7.BO's competition here
IPL.BO vs EIDPARRY.BO Comparison June 2026
IPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPL.BO stands at 19.1B. In comparison, EIDPARRY.BO has a market cap of 126.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IPL.BO is priced at ₹166.35, while EIDPARRY.BO trades at ₹710.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.00, whereas EIDPARRY.BO's P/E ratio is 10.98. In terms of profitability, IPL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to EIDPARRY.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IPL.BO is more volatile compared to EIDPARRY.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPL.BO.Check EIDPARRY.BO's competition here
IPL.BO vs EIDPARRY.NS Comparison June 2026
IPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPL.BO stands at 19.1B. In comparison, EIDPARRY.NS has a market cap of 126.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IPL.BO is priced at ₹166.35, while EIDPARRY.NS trades at ₹710.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.00, whereas EIDPARRY.NS's P/E ratio is 22.25. In terms of profitability, IPL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to EIDPARRY.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IPL.BO is more volatile compared to EIDPARRY.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPL.BO.Check EIDPARRY.NS's competition here
IPL.BO vs PARADEEP.BO Comparison June 2026
IPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPL.BO stands at 19.1B. In comparison, PARADEEP.BO has a market cap of 110.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IPL.BO is priced at ₹166.35, while PARADEEP.BO trades at ₹135.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.00, whereas PARADEEP.BO's P/E ratio is 14.09. In terms of profitability, IPL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PARADEEP.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, IPL.BO is less volatile compared to PARADEEP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPL.BO.Check PARADEEP.BO's competition here
IPL.BO vs PARADEEP.NS Comparison June 2026
IPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPL.BO stands at 19.1B. In comparison, PARADEEP.NS has a market cap of 110.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IPL.BO is priced at ₹166.35, while PARADEEP.NS trades at ₹134.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.00, whereas PARADEEP.NS's P/E ratio is 14.08. In terms of profitability, IPL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PARADEEP.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, IPL.BO is more volatile compared to PARADEEP.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPL.BO.Check PARADEEP.NS's competition here
IPL.BO vs SHARDACROP.NS Comparison June 2026
IPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPL.BO stands at 19.1B. In comparison, SHARDACROP.NS has a market cap of 80.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IPL.BO is priced at ₹166.35, while SHARDACROP.NS trades at ₹887.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.00, whereas SHARDACROP.NS's P/E ratio is 11.76. In terms of profitability, IPL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SHARDACROP.NS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, IPL.BO is more volatile compared to SHARDACROP.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPL.BO.Check SHARDACROP.NS's competition here
IPL.BO vs SHARDACROP.BO Comparison June 2026
IPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPL.BO stands at 19.1B. In comparison, SHARDACROP.BO has a market cap of 80B. Regarding current trading prices, IPL.BO is priced at ₹166.35, while SHARDACROP.BO trades at ₹887.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.00, whereas SHARDACROP.BO's P/E ratio is 11.77. In terms of profitability, IPL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SHARDACROP.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, IPL.BO is more volatile compared to SHARDACROP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPL.BO.Check SHARDACROP.BO's competition here
IPL.BO vs RCF.NS Comparison June 2026
IPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPL.BO stands at 19.1B. In comparison, RCF.NS has a market cap of 74B. Regarding current trading prices, IPL.BO is priced at ₹166.35, while RCF.NS trades at ₹134.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.00, whereas RCF.NS's P/E ratio is 17.31. In terms of profitability, IPL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RCF.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IPL.BO is more volatile compared to RCF.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPL.BO.Check RCF.NS's competition here
IPL.BO vs RCF.BO Comparison June 2026
IPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPL.BO stands at 19.1B. In comparison, RCF.BO has a market cap of 74B. Regarding current trading prices, IPL.BO is priced at ₹166.35, while RCF.BO trades at ₹134.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.00, whereas RCF.BO's P/E ratio is 17.34. In terms of profitability, IPL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RCF.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IPL.BO is more volatile compared to RCF.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPL.BO.Check RCF.BO's competition here
IPL.BO vs GSFC.BO Comparison June 2026
IPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPL.BO stands at 19.1B. In comparison, GSFC.BO has a market cap of 65.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IPL.BO is priced at ₹166.35, while GSFC.BO trades at ₹163.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.00, whereas GSFC.BO's P/E ratio is 9.76. In terms of profitability, IPL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GSFC.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IPL.BO is more volatile compared to GSFC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPL.BO.Check GSFC.BO's competition here
IPL.BO vs GSFC.NS Comparison June 2026
IPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPL.BO stands at 19.1B. In comparison, GSFC.NS has a market cap of 65.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IPL.BO is priced at ₹166.35, while GSFC.NS trades at ₹163.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.00, whereas GSFC.NS's P/E ratio is 9.69. In terms of profitability, IPL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GSFC.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IPL.BO is more volatile compared to GSFC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPL.BO.Check GSFC.NS's competition here
IPL.BO vs PICCADIL.BO Comparison June 2026
IPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPL.BO stands at 19.1B. In comparison, PICCADIL.BO has a market cap of 55.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IPL.BO is priced at ₹166.35, while PICCADIL.BO trades at ₹567.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.00, whereas PICCADIL.BO's P/E ratio is 39.99. In terms of profitability, IPL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PICCADIL.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, IPL.BO is more volatile compared to PICCADIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPL.BO.Check PICCADIL.BO's competition here
IPL.BO vs CIANAGRO.BO Comparison June 2026
IPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPL.BO stands at 19.1B. In comparison, CIANAGRO.BO has a market cap of 49.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IPL.BO is priced at ₹166.35, while CIANAGRO.BO trades at ₹1,769.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.00, whereas CIANAGRO.BO's P/E ratio is 44.02. In terms of profitability, IPL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CIANAGRO.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IPL.BO is more volatile compared to CIANAGRO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPL.BO.Check CIANAGRO.BO's competition here
IPL.BO vs DHANUKA.NS Comparison June 2026
IPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPL.BO stands at 19.1B. In comparison, DHANUKA.NS has a market cap of 48.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IPL.BO is priced at ₹166.35, while DHANUKA.NS trades at ₹1,073.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.00, whereas DHANUKA.NS's P/E ratio is 16.86. In terms of profitability, IPL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DHANUKA.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, IPL.BO is more volatile compared to DHANUKA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPL.BO.Check DHANUKA.NS's competition here
IPL.BO vs DHANUKA.BO Comparison June 2026
IPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPL.BO stands at 19.1B. In comparison, DHANUKA.BO has a market cap of 48.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IPL.BO is priced at ₹166.35, while DHANUKA.BO trades at ₹1,072.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.00, whereas DHANUKA.BO's P/E ratio is 16.84. In terms of profitability, IPL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DHANUKA.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, IPL.BO is more volatile compared to DHANUKA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPL.BO.Check DHANUKA.BO's competition here
IPL.BO vs MBAPL.NS Comparison June 2026
IPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPL.BO stands at 19.1B. In comparison, MBAPL.NS has a market cap of 48.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IPL.BO is priced at ₹166.35, while MBAPL.NS trades at ₹550.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.00, whereas MBAPL.NS's P/E ratio is 32.15. In terms of profitability, IPL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MBAPL.NS's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, IPL.BO is more volatile compared to MBAPL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPL.BO.Check MBAPL.NS's competition here
IPL.BO vs KSCL.NS Comparison June 2026
IPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPL.BO stands at 19.1B. In comparison, KSCL.NS has a market cap of 47.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IPL.BO is priced at ₹166.35, while KSCL.NS trades at ₹930.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.00, whereas KSCL.NS's P/E ratio is 16.35. In terms of profitability, IPL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KSCL.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, IPL.BO is less volatile compared to KSCL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPL.BO.Check KSCL.NS's competition here
IPL.BO vs KSCL.BO Comparison June 2026
IPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPL.BO stands at 19.1B. In comparison, KSCL.BO has a market cap of 47.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IPL.BO is priced at ₹166.35, while KSCL.BO trades at ₹930.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.00, whereas KSCL.BO's P/E ratio is 16.33. In terms of profitability, IPL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KSCL.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, IPL.BO is less volatile compared to KSCL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPL.BO.Check KSCL.BO's competition here
IPL.BO vs RALLIS.NS Comparison June 2026
IPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPL.BO stands at 19.1B. In comparison, RALLIS.NS has a market cap of 44.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IPL.BO is priced at ₹166.35, while RALLIS.NS trades at ₹228.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.00, whereas RALLIS.NS's P/E ratio is 24.13. In terms of profitability, IPL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RALLIS.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IPL.BO is more volatile compared to RALLIS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPL.BO.Check RALLIS.NS's competition here
IPL.BO vs RALLIS.BO Comparison June 2026
IPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPL.BO stands at 19.1B. In comparison, RALLIS.BO has a market cap of 44.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IPL.BO is priced at ₹166.35, while RALLIS.BO trades at ₹228.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.00, whereas RALLIS.BO's P/E ratio is 26.61. In terms of profitability, IPL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RALLIS.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IPL.BO is more volatile compared to RALLIS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPL.BO.Check RALLIS.BO's competition here
IPL.BO vs KRISHANA.NS Comparison June 2026
IPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPL.BO stands at 19.1B. In comparison, KRISHANA.NS has a market cap of 42B. Regarding current trading prices, IPL.BO is priced at ₹166.35, while KRISHANA.NS trades at ₹679.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.00, whereas KRISHANA.NS's P/E ratio is 23.32. In terms of profitability, IPL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KRISHANA.NS's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, IPL.BO is more volatile compared to KRISHANA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPL.BO.Check KRISHANA.NS's competition here
IPL.BO vs NACLIND.BO Comparison June 2026
IPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPL.BO stands at 19.1B. In comparison, NACLIND.BO has a market cap of 40.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IPL.BO is priced at ₹166.35, while NACLIND.BO trades at ₹206.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.00, whereas NACLIND.BO's P/E ratio is 938.18. In terms of profitability, IPL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NACLIND.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IPL.BO is less volatile compared to NACLIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPL.BO.Check NACLIND.BO's competition here
IPL.BO vs NACLIND.NS Comparison June 2026
IPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPL.BO stands at 19.1B. In comparison, NACLIND.NS has a market cap of 40.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IPL.BO is priced at ₹166.35, while NACLIND.NS trades at ₹205.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.00, whereas NACLIND.NS's P/E ratio is 979.62. In terms of profitability, IPL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NACLIND.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IPL.BO is less volatile compared to NACLIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPL.BO.Check NACLIND.NS's competition here
IPL.BO vs NFL.BO Comparison June 2026
IPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPL.BO stands at 19.1B. In comparison, NFL.BO has a market cap of 37.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IPL.BO is priced at ₹166.35, while NFL.BO trades at ₹76.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.00, whereas NFL.BO's P/E ratio is 17.82. In terms of profitability, IPL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NFL.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IPL.BO is more volatile compared to NFL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPL.BO.Check NFL.BO's competition here
IPL.BO vs NFL.NS Comparison June 2026
IPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPL.BO stands at 19.1B. In comparison, NFL.NS has a market cap of 37.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IPL.BO is priced at ₹166.35, while NFL.NS trades at ₹76.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.00, whereas NFL.NS's P/E ratio is 17.81. In terms of profitability, IPL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NFL.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IPL.BO is more volatile compared to NFL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPL.BO.Check NFL.NS's competition here
IPL.BO vs BHAGCHEM.BO Comparison June 2026
IPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPL.BO stands at 19.1B. In comparison, BHAGCHEM.BO has a market cap of 36.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IPL.BO is priced at ₹166.35, while BHAGCHEM.BO trades at ₹282.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.00, whereas BHAGCHEM.BO's P/E ratio is 259.54. In terms of profitability, IPL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BHAGCHEM.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IPL.BO is more volatile compared to BHAGCHEM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPL.BO.Check BHAGCHEM.BO's competition here
IPL.BO vs MANGCHEFER.NS Comparison June 2026
IPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPL.BO stands at 19.1B. In comparison, MANGCHEFER.NS has a market cap of 36.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IPL.BO is priced at ₹166.35, while MANGCHEFER.NS trades at ₹308.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.00, whereas MANGCHEFER.NS's P/E ratio is 22.67. In terms of profitability, IPL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MANGCHEFER.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IPL.BO is more volatile compared to MANGCHEFER.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPL.BO.Check MANGCHEFER.NS's competition here
IPL.BO vs MANGCHEFER.BO Comparison June 2026
IPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPL.BO stands at 19.1B. In comparison, MANGCHEFER.BO has a market cap of 36.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IPL.BO is priced at ₹166.35, while MANGCHEFER.BO trades at ₹308.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.00, whereas MANGCHEFER.BO's P/E ratio is 22.63. In terms of profitability, IPL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MANGCHEFER.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IPL.BO is more volatile compared to MANGCHEFER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPL.BO.Check MANGCHEFER.BO's competition here
IPL.BO vs BHAGCHEM.NS Comparison June 2026
IPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPL.BO stands at 19.1B. In comparison, BHAGCHEM.NS has a market cap of 36.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IPL.BO is priced at ₹166.35, while BHAGCHEM.NS trades at ₹281.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.00, whereas BHAGCHEM.NS's P/E ratio is 258.46. In terms of profitability, IPL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BHAGCHEM.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IPL.BO is more volatile compared to BHAGCHEM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPL.BO.Check BHAGCHEM.NS's competition here
IPL.BO vs BNHOLDINGS.BO Comparison June 2026
IPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPL.BO stands at 19.1B. In comparison, BNHOLDINGS.BO has a market cap of 34.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IPL.BO is priced at ₹166.35, while BNHOLDINGS.BO trades at ₹355.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.00, whereas BNHOLDINGS.BO's P/E ratio is 26.71. In terms of profitability, IPL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BNHOLDINGS.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IPL.BO is less volatile compared to BNHOLDINGS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPL.BO.Check BNHOLDINGS.BO's competition here
IPL.BO vs VENKYS.BO Comparison June 2026
IPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPL.BO stands at 19.1B. In comparison, VENKYS.BO has a market cap of 24.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IPL.BO is priced at ₹166.35, while VENKYS.BO trades at ₹1,714.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.00, whereas VENKYS.BO's P/E ratio is -57.49. In terms of profitability, IPL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VENKYS.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IPL.BO is less volatile compared to VENKYS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPL.BO.Check VENKYS.BO's competition here
IPL.BO vs KSE.NS Comparison June 2026
IPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPL.BO stands at 19.1B. In comparison, KSE.NS has a market cap of 22.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IPL.BO is priced at ₹166.35, while KSE.NS trades at ₹697.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.00, whereas KSE.NS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IPL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KSE.NS's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, IPL.BO is more volatile compared to KSE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPL.BO.Check KSE.NS's competition here
IPL.BO vs INSECTICID.NS Comparison June 2026
IPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPL.BO stands at 19.1B. In comparison, INSECTICID.NS has a market cap of 19.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IPL.BO is priced at ₹166.35, while INSECTICID.NS trades at ₹673.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.00, whereas INSECTICID.NS's P/E ratio is 14.06. In terms of profitability, IPL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to INSECTICID.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IPL.BO is more volatile compared to INSECTICID.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPL.BO.Check INSECTICID.NS's competition here
IPL.BO vs INSECTICID.BO Comparison June 2026
IPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPL.BO stands at 19.1B. In comparison, INSECTICID.BO has a market cap of 19.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IPL.BO is priced at ₹166.35, while INSECTICID.BO trades at ₹675.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.00, whereas INSECTICID.BO's P/E ratio is 14.06. In terms of profitability, IPL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to INSECTICID.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IPL.BO is more volatile compared to INSECTICID.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPL.BO.Check INSECTICID.BO's competition here
IPL.BO vs IPL.NS Comparison June 2026
IPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPL.BO stands at 19.1B. In comparison, IPL.NS has a market cap of 19.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IPL.BO is priced at ₹166.35, while IPL.NS trades at ₹165.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.00, whereas IPL.NS's P/E ratio is 15.96. In terms of profitability, IPL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to IPL.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IPL.BO is less volatile compared to IPL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPL.BO.Check IPL.NS's competition here
IPL.BO vs ASTEC.NS Comparison June 2026
IPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPL.BO stands at 19.1B. In comparison, ASTEC.NS has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IPL.BO is priced at ₹166.35, while ASTEC.NS trades at ₹768.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.00, whereas ASTEC.NS's P/E ratio is -20.33. In terms of profitability, IPL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ASTEC.NS's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, IPL.BO is less volatile compared to ASTEC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPL.BO.Check ASTEC.NS's competition here
IPL.BO vs ASTEC.BO Comparison June 2026
IPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPL.BO stands at 19.1B. In comparison, ASTEC.BO has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IPL.BO is priced at ₹166.35, while ASTEC.BO trades at ₹767.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.00, whereas ASTEC.BO's P/E ratio is -20.29. In terms of profitability, IPL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ASTEC.BO's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, IPL.BO is more volatile compared to ASTEC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPL.BO.Check ASTEC.BO's competition here
IPL.BO vs SPIC.NS Comparison June 2026
IPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPL.BO stands at 19.1B. In comparison, SPIC.NS has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IPL.BO is priced at ₹166.35, while SPIC.NS trades at ₹69.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.00, whereas SPIC.NS's P/E ratio is 6.73. In terms of profitability, IPL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SPIC.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, IPL.BO is more volatile compared to SPIC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPL.BO.Check SPIC.NS's competition here
IPL.BO vs SPIC.BO Comparison June 2026
IPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPL.BO stands at 19.1B. In comparison, SPIC.BO has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IPL.BO is priced at ₹166.35, while SPIC.BO trades at ₹69.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.00, whereas SPIC.BO's P/E ratio is 7.67. In terms of profitability, IPL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SPIC.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, IPL.BO is more volatile compared to SPIC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPL.BO.Check SPIC.BO's competition here
IPL.BO vs MOL.NS Comparison June 2026
IPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPL.BO stands at 19.1B. In comparison, MOL.NS has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IPL.BO is priced at ₹166.35, while MOL.NS trades at ₹49.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.00, whereas MOL.NS's P/E ratio is 43.89. In terms of profitability, IPL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MOL.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IPL.BO is less volatile compared to MOL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPL.BO.Check MOL.NS's competition here
IPL.BO vs MOL.BO Comparison June 2026
IPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPL.BO stands at 19.1B. In comparison, MOL.BO has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IPL.BO is priced at ₹166.35, while MOL.BO trades at ₹49.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.00, whereas MOL.BO's P/E ratio is 43.98. In terms of profitability, IPL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MOL.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IPL.BO is less volatile compared to MOL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPL.BO.Check MOL.BO's competition here
IPL.BO vs BLUECLOUDS.BO Comparison June 2026
IPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPL.BO stands at 19.1B. In comparison, BLUECLOUDS.BO has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IPL.BO is priced at ₹166.35, while BLUECLOUDS.BO trades at ₹25.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.00, whereas BLUECLOUDS.BO's P/E ratio is 22.96. In terms of profitability, IPL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BLUECLOUDS.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, IPL.BO is less volatile compared to BLUECLOUDS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPL.BO.Check BLUECLOUDS.BO's competition here
IPL.BO vs BHARATRAS.BO Comparison June 2026
IPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPL.BO stands at 19.1B. In comparison, BHARATRAS.BO has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IPL.BO is priced at ₹166.35, while BHARATRAS.BO trades at ₹1,395.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.00, whereas BHARATRAS.BO's P/E ratio is 17.40. In terms of profitability, IPL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BHARATRAS.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IPL.BO is more volatile compared to BHARATRAS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPL.BO.Check BHARATRAS.BO's competition here
IPL.BO vs BHARATRAS.NS Comparison June 2026
IPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPL.BO stands at 19.1B. In comparison, BHARATRAS.NS has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IPL.BO is priced at ₹166.35, while BHARATRAS.NS trades at ₹1,392.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.00, whereas BHARATRAS.NS's P/E ratio is 3.97. In terms of profitability, IPL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BHARATRAS.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IPL.BO is more volatile compared to BHARATRAS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPL.BO.Check BHARATRAS.NS's competition here
IPL.BO vs MADRASFERT.BO Comparison June 2026
IPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPL.BO stands at 19.1B. In comparison, MADRASFERT.BO has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IPL.BO is priced at ₹166.35, while MADRASFERT.BO trades at ₹70.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.00, whereas MADRASFERT.BO's P/E ratio is 14.07. In terms of profitability, IPL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MADRASFERT.BO's ROE of +6.18%. Regarding short-term risk, IPL.BO is more volatile compared to MADRASFERT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPL.BO.Check MADRASFERT.BO's competition here
IPL.BO vs MADRASFERT.NS Comparison June 2026
IPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPL.BO stands at 19.1B. In comparison, MADRASFERT.NS has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IPL.BO is priced at ₹166.35, while MADRASFERT.NS trades at ₹70.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.00, whereas MADRASFERT.NS's P/E ratio is 14.05. In terms of profitability, IPL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MADRASFERT.NS's ROE of +6.18%. Regarding short-term risk, IPL.BO is more volatile compared to MADRASFERT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPL.BO.Check MADRASFERT.NS's competition here
IPL.BO vs ZUARI.BO Comparison June 2026
IPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPL.BO stands at 19.1B. In comparison, ZUARI.BO has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IPL.BO is priced at ₹166.35, while ZUARI.BO trades at ₹235.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.00, whereas ZUARI.BO's P/E ratio is 1.07. In terms of profitability, IPL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ZUARI.BO's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, IPL.BO is less volatile compared to ZUARI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPL.BO.Check ZUARI.BO's competition here
IPL.BO vs ZUARI.NS Comparison June 2026
IPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPL.BO stands at 19.1B. In comparison, ZUARI.NS has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IPL.BO is priced at ₹166.35, while ZUARI.NS trades at ₹235.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.00, whereas ZUARI.NS's P/E ratio is 1.08. In terms of profitability, IPL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ZUARI.NS's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, IPL.BO is less volatile compared to ZUARI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPL.BO.Check ZUARI.NS's competition here
IPL.BO vs BSHSL.NS Comparison June 2026
IPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPL.BO stands at 19.1B. In comparison, BSHSL.NS has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IPL.BO is priced at ₹166.35, while BSHSL.NS trades at ₹91.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.00, whereas BSHSL.NS's P/E ratio is 36.00. In terms of profitability, IPL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BSHSL.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, IPL.BO is more volatile compared to BSHSL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPL.BO.Check BSHSL.NS's competition here
IPL.BO vs DHARMAJ.BO Comparison June 2026
IPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPL.BO stands at 19.1B. In comparison, DHARMAJ.BO has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, IPL.BO is priced at ₹166.35, while DHARMAJ.BO trades at ₹265.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.00, whereas DHARMAJ.BO's P/E ratio is 16.42. In terms of profitability, IPL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DHARMAJ.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IPL.BO is more volatile compared to DHARMAJ.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPL.BO.Check DHARMAJ.BO's competition here
IPL.BO vs DHARMAJ.NS Comparison June 2026
IPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPL.BO stands at 19.1B. In comparison, DHARMAJ.NS has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, IPL.BO is priced at ₹166.35, while DHARMAJ.NS trades at ₹264.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.00, whereas DHARMAJ.NS's P/E ratio is 54.33. In terms of profitability, IPL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DHARMAJ.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IPL.BO is more volatile compared to DHARMAJ.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPL.BO.Check DHARMAJ.NS's competition here
IPL.BO vs BAJAJST.BO Comparison June 2026
IPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPL.BO stands at 19.1B. In comparison, BAJAJST.BO has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IPL.BO is priced at ₹166.35, while BAJAJST.BO trades at ₹398.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.00, whereas BAJAJST.BO's P/E ratio is 22.10. In terms of profitability, IPL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BAJAJST.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IPL.BO is less volatile compared to BAJAJST.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPL.BO.Check BAJAJST.BO's competition here
IPL.BO vs HERANBA.NS Comparison June 2026
IPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPL.BO stands at 19.1B. In comparison, HERANBA.NS has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IPL.BO is priced at ₹166.35, while HERANBA.NS trades at ₹190.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.00, whereas HERANBA.NS's P/E ratio is -9.96. In terms of profitability, IPL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HERANBA.NS's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IPL.BO is less volatile compared to HERANBA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPL.BO.Check HERANBA.NS's competition here
IPL.BO vs HERANBA.BO Comparison June 2026
IPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPL.BO stands at 19.1B. In comparison, HERANBA.BO has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IPL.BO is priced at ₹166.35, while HERANBA.BO trades at ₹189.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.00, whereas HERANBA.BO's P/E ratio is -9.94. In terms of profitability, IPL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HERANBA.BO's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IPL.BO is less volatile compared to HERANBA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPL.BO.Check HERANBA.BO's competition here
IPL.BO vs KSE.BO Comparison June 2026
IPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPL.BO stands at 19.1B. In comparison, KSE.BO has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, IPL.BO is priced at ₹166.35, while KSE.BO trades at ₹187.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.00, whereas KSE.BO's P/E ratio is 20.85. In terms of profitability, IPL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KSE.BO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, IPL.BO is more volatile compared to KSE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPL.BO.Check KSE.BO's competition here
IPL.BO vs SHINDL.BO Comparison June 2026
IPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPL.BO stands at 19.1B. In comparison, SHINDL.BO has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IPL.BO is priced at ₹166.35, while SHINDL.BO trades at ₹147.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.00, whereas SHINDL.BO's P/E ratio is 36.38. In terms of profitability, IPL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SHINDL.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IPL.BO is less volatile compared to SHINDL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPL.BO.Check SHINDL.BO's competition here
IPL.BO vs BESTAGRO.NS Comparison June 2026
IPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPL.BO stands at 19.1B. In comparison, BESTAGRO.NS has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IPL.BO is priced at ₹166.35, while BESTAGRO.NS trades at ₹15.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.00, whereas BESTAGRO.NS's P/E ratio is 62.08. In terms of profitability, IPL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BESTAGRO.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IPL.BO is more volatile compared to BESTAGRO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPL.BO.Check BESTAGRO.NS's competition here
IPL.BO vs BESTAGRO.BO Comparison June 2026
IPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPL.BO stands at 19.1B. In comparison, BESTAGRO.BO has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IPL.BO is priced at ₹166.35, while BESTAGRO.BO trades at ₹15.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.00, whereas BESTAGRO.BO's P/E ratio is 62.12. In terms of profitability, IPL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BESTAGRO.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IPL.BO is more volatile compared to BESTAGRO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPL.BO.Check BESTAGRO.BO's competition here
IPL.BO vs SVRL.BO Comparison June 2026
IPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPL.BO stands at 19.1B. In comparison, SVRL.BO has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IPL.BO is priced at ₹166.35, while SVRL.BO trades at ₹248.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.00, whereas SVRL.BO's P/E ratio is 14.37. In terms of profitability, IPL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SVRL.BO's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, IPL.BO is less volatile compared to SVRL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPL.BO.Check SVRL.BO's competition here
IPL.BO vs KHAICHEM.NS Comparison June 2026
IPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPL.BO stands at 19.1B. In comparison, KHAICHEM.NS has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IPL.BO is priced at ₹166.35, while KHAICHEM.NS trades at ₹56.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.00, whereas KHAICHEM.NS's P/E ratio is 7.94. In terms of profitability, IPL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KHAICHEM.NS's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, IPL.BO is more volatile compared to KHAICHEM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPL.BO.Check KHAICHEM.NS's competition here
IPL.BO vs MODINATUR.BO Comparison June 2026
IPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPL.BO stands at 19.1B. In comparison, MODINATUR.BO has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IPL.BO is priced at ₹166.35, while MODINATUR.BO trades at ₹405.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.00, whereas MODINATUR.BO's P/E ratio is 10.67. In terms of profitability, IPL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MODINATUR.BO's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, IPL.BO is less volatile compared to MODINATUR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPL.BO.Check MODINATUR.BO's competition here
IPL.BO vs KHAICHEM.BO Comparison June 2026
IPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPL.BO stands at 19.1B. In comparison, KHAICHEM.BO has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IPL.BO is priced at ₹166.35, while KHAICHEM.BO trades at ₹55.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.00, whereas KHAICHEM.BO's P/E ratio is 7.80. In terms of profitability, IPL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KHAICHEM.BO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, IPL.BO is less volatile compared to KHAICHEM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPL.BO.Check KHAICHEM.BO's competition here
IPL.BO vs KNAGRI.NS Comparison June 2026
IPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPL.BO stands at 19.1B. In comparison, KNAGRI.NS has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IPL.BO is priced at ₹166.35, while KNAGRI.NS trades at ₹210.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.00, whereas KNAGRI.NS's P/E ratio is 14.24. In terms of profitability, IPL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KNAGRI.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IPL.BO is less volatile compared to KNAGRI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPL.BO.Check KNAGRI.NS's competition here
IPL.BO vs RAMAPHO.NS Comparison June 2026
IPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPL.BO stands at 19.1B. In comparison, RAMAPHO.NS has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IPL.BO is priced at ₹166.35, while RAMAPHO.NS trades at ₹135.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.00, whereas RAMAPHO.NS's P/E ratio is 9.06. In terms of profitability, IPL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RAMAPHO.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IPL.BO is less volatile compared to RAMAPHO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPL.BO.Check RAMAPHO.NS's competition here
IPL.BO vs RAMAPHO.BO Comparison June 2026
IPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPL.BO stands at 19.1B. In comparison, RAMAPHO.BO has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IPL.BO is priced at ₹166.35, while RAMAPHO.BO trades at ₹134.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.00, whereas RAMAPHO.BO's P/E ratio is 9.02. In terms of profitability, IPL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RAMAPHO.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IPL.BO is less volatile compared to RAMAPHO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPL.BO.Check RAMAPHO.BO's competition here
IPL.BO vs ARIES.NS Comparison June 2026
IPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPL.BO stands at 19.1B. In comparison, ARIES.NS has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IPL.BO is priced at ₹166.35, while ARIES.NS trades at ₹333.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.00, whereas ARIES.NS's P/E ratio is 10.11. In terms of profitability, IPL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ARIES.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IPL.BO is more volatile compared to ARIES.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPL.BO.Check ARIES.NS's competition here
IPL.BO vs ARIES.BO Comparison June 2026
IPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPL.BO stands at 19.1B. In comparison, ARIES.BO has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IPL.BO is priced at ₹166.35, while ARIES.BO trades at ₹336.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.00, whereas ARIES.BO's P/E ratio is 10.21. In terms of profitability, IPL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ARIES.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IPL.BO is more volatile compared to ARIES.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPL.BO.Check ARIES.BO's competition here
IPL.BO vs MISHTANN.BO Comparison June 2026
IPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPL.BO stands at 19.1B. In comparison, MISHTANN.BO has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IPL.BO is priced at ₹166.35, while MISHTANN.BO trades at ₹3.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.00, whereas MISHTANN.BO's P/E ratio is 1.61. In terms of profitability, IPL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MISHTANN.BO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, IPL.BO is more volatile compared to MISHTANN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPL.BO.Check MISHTANN.BO's competition here
IPL.BO vs GOODRICKE.BO Comparison June 2026
IPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPL.BO stands at 19.1B. In comparison, GOODRICKE.BO has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IPL.BO is priced at ₹166.35, while GOODRICKE.BO trades at ₹178.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.00, whereas GOODRICKE.BO's P/E ratio is 15.09. In terms of profitability, IPL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GOODRICKE.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IPL.BO is more volatile compared to GOODRICKE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPL.BO.Check GOODRICKE.BO's competition here
IPL.BO vs IGCL.NS Comparison June 2026
IPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPL.BO stands at 19.1B. In comparison, IGCL.NS has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IPL.BO is priced at ₹166.35, while IGCL.NS trades at ₹60.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.00, whereas IGCL.NS's P/E ratio is 8.96. In terms of profitability, IPL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to IGCL.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IPL.BO is less volatile compared to IGCL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPL.BO.Check IGCL.NS's competition here
IPL.BO vs SBECSUG.BO Comparison June 2026
IPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPL.BO stands at 19.1B. In comparison, SBECSUG.BO has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IPL.BO is priced at ₹166.35, while SBECSUG.BO trades at ₹72.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.00, whereas SBECSUG.BO's P/E ratio is 18.59. In terms of profitability, IPL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SBECSUG.BO's ROE of -1.29%. Regarding short-term risk, IPL.BO is more volatile compared to SBECSUG.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPL.BO.Check SBECSUG.BO's competition here
IPL.BO vs NATHBIOGEN.NS Comparison June 2026
IPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPL.BO stands at 19.1B. In comparison, NATHBIOGEN.NS has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IPL.BO is priced at ₹166.35, while NATHBIOGEN.NS trades at ₹167.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.00, whereas NATHBIOGEN.NS's P/E ratio is 45.97. In terms of profitability, IPL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NATHBIOGEN.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IPL.BO is more volatile compared to NATHBIOGEN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPL.BO.Check NATHBIOGEN.NS's competition here
IPL.BO vs NATHBIOGEN.BO Comparison June 2026
IPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPL.BO stands at 19.1B. In comparison, NATHBIOGEN.BO has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IPL.BO is priced at ₹166.35, while NATHBIOGEN.BO trades at ₹167.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.00, whereas NATHBIOGEN.BO's P/E ratio is 7.98. In terms of profitability, IPL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NATHBIOGEN.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IPL.BO is more volatile compared to NATHBIOGEN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPL.BO.Check NATHBIOGEN.BO's competition here
IPL.BO vs KINGSINFR.BO Comparison June 2026
IPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPL.BO stands at 19.1B. In comparison, KINGSINFR.BO has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IPL.BO is priced at ₹166.35, while KINGSINFR.BO trades at ₹126.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.00, whereas KINGSINFR.BO's P/E ratio is 19.21. In terms of profitability, IPL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KINGSINFR.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, IPL.BO is more volatile compared to KINGSINFR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPL.BO.Check KINGSINFR.BO's competition here
IPL.BO vs HOACFOODS.NS Comparison June 2026
IPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPL.BO stands at 19.1B. In comparison, HOACFOODS.NS has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, IPL.BO is priced at ₹166.35, while HOACFOODS.NS trades at ₹680.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.00, whereas HOACFOODS.NS's P/E ratio is 100.44. In terms of profitability, IPL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HOACFOODS.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IPL.BO is more volatile compared to HOACFOODS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPL.BO.Check HOACFOODS.NS's competition here
IPL.BO vs EQUIPPP.NS Comparison June 2026
IPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPL.BO stands at 19.1B. In comparison, EQUIPPP.NS has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IPL.BO is priced at ₹166.35, while EQUIPPP.NS trades at ₹21.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.00, whereas EQUIPPP.NS's P/E ratio is 121.61. In terms of profitability, IPL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to EQUIPPP.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IPL.BO is more volatile compared to EQUIPPP.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPL.BO.Check EQUIPPP.NS's competition here
IPL.BO vs NOVAAGRI.NS Comparison June 2026
IPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPL.BO stands at 19.1B. In comparison, NOVAAGRI.NS has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IPL.BO is priced at ₹166.35, while NOVAAGRI.NS trades at ₹24.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.00, whereas NOVAAGRI.NS's P/E ratio is 17.43. In terms of profitability, IPL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NOVAAGRI.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IPL.BO is less volatile compared to NOVAAGRI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPL.BO.Check NOVAAGRI.NS's competition here
IPL.BO vs EQUIPPP.BO Comparison June 2026
IPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPL.BO stands at 19.1B. In comparison, EQUIPPP.BO has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IPL.BO is priced at ₹166.35, while EQUIPPP.BO trades at ₹21.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.00, whereas EQUIPPP.BO's P/E ratio is 119.44. In terms of profitability, IPL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to EQUIPPP.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IPL.BO is less volatile compared to EQUIPPP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPL.BO.Check EQUIPPP.BO's competition here
IPL.BO vs NAGAFERT.BO Comparison June 2026
IPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPL.BO stands at 19.1B. In comparison, NAGAFERT.BO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, IPL.BO is priced at ₹166.35, while NAGAFERT.BO trades at ₹3.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.00, whereas NAGAFERT.BO's P/E ratio is -7.26. In terms of profitability, IPL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NAGAFERT.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IPL.BO is more volatile compared to NAGAFERT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPL.BO.Check NAGAFERT.BO's competition here
IPL.BO vs NAGAFERT.NS Comparison June 2026
IPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPL.BO stands at 19.1B. In comparison, NAGAFERT.NS has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, IPL.BO is priced at ₹166.35, while NAGAFERT.NS trades at ₹3.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.00, whereas NAGAFERT.NS's P/E ratio is -7.28. In terms of profitability, IPL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NAGAFERT.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IPL.BO is more volatile compared to NAGAFERT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPL.BO.Check NAGAFERT.NS's competition here
IPL.BO vs RBS.NS Comparison June 2026
IPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPL.BO stands at 19.1B. In comparison, RBS.NS has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IPL.BO is priced at ₹166.35, while RBS.NS trades at ₹84.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.00, whereas RBS.NS's P/E ratio is 12.24. In terms of profitability, IPL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RBS.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IPL.BO is more volatile compared to RBS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPL.BO.Check RBS.NS's competition here
IPL.BO vs VIJSOLX.BO Comparison June 2026
IPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPL.BO stands at 19.1B. In comparison, VIJSOLX.BO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IPL.BO is priced at ₹166.35, while VIJSOLX.BO trades at ₹593.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.00, whereas VIJSOLX.BO's P/E ratio is 9.84. In terms of profitability, IPL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VIJSOLX.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IPL.BO is less volatile compared to VIJSOLX.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPL.BO.Check VIJSOLX.BO's competition here
IPL.BO vs INDOUS.NS Comparison June 2026
IPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPL.BO stands at 19.1B. In comparison, INDOUS.NS has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IPL.BO is priced at ₹166.35, while INDOUS.NS trades at ₹89.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.00, whereas INDOUS.NS's P/E ratio is 13.71. In terms of profitability, IPL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to INDOUS.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IPL.BO is less volatile compared to INDOUS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPL.BO.Check INDOUS.NS's competition here
IPL.BO vs INDOUS.BO Comparison June 2026
IPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPL.BO stands at 19.1B. In comparison, INDOUS.BO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IPL.BO is priced at ₹166.35, while INDOUS.BO trades at ₹89.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.00, whereas INDOUS.BO's P/E ratio is 13.66. In terms of profitability, IPL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to INDOUS.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IPL.BO is less volatile compared to INDOUS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPL.BO.Check INDOUS.BO's competition here
IPL.BO vs BHARATAGRI.BO Comparison June 2026
IPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPL.BO stands at 19.1B. In comparison, BHARATAGRI.BO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IPL.BO is priced at ₹166.35, while BHARATAGRI.BO trades at ₹29.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.00, whereas BHARATAGRI.BO's P/E ratio is -30.99. In terms of profitability, IPL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BHARATAGRI.BO's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IPL.BO is more volatile compared to BHARATAGRI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPL.BO.Check BHARATAGRI.BO's competition here