Bayer CropScience Limited (BAYERCROP.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (BAYERCROP.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Agricultural Inputs Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BAYERCROP.NS | ₹4,298.40 | +0.32% | 192B | 27.85 | ₹153.40 | +2.93% |
| FACT.BO | ₹899.55 | +3.72% | 566.9B | -1436.31 | -₹0.61 | +0.04% |
| FACT.NS | ₹901.35 | +4.04% | 566.9B | -1436.15 | -₹0.61 | +0.04% |
| COROMANDEL.NS | ₹1,880.70 | +7.40% | 532.2B | 27.23 | ₹66.37 | +0.61% |
| COROMANDEL.BO | ₹1,880.65 | +7.70% | 532.2B | 27.26 | ₹66.35 | +0.61% |
| UPL.NS | ₹611.00 | -2.23% | 530.5B | 28.17 | ₹22.31 | +0.95% |
| UPL.BO | ₹611.00 | -2.25% | 529.3B | 28.12 | ₹22.30 | +0.95% |
| PIIND.NS | ₹2,807.70 | +4.73% | 434.8B | 32.96 | ₹86.97 | +0.52% |
| PIIND.BO | ₹2,806.35 | +4.66% | 434.8B | 32.87 | ₹87.15 | +0.52% |
| SUMICHEM.NS | ₹456.65 | -0.76% | 230.5B | 42.52 | ₹10.86 | +0.26% |
Stock Comparison
BAYERCROP.NS vs FACT.BO Comparison June 2026
BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 192B. In comparison, FACT.BO has a market cap of 566.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,298.40, while FACT.BO trades at ₹899.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.85, whereas FACT.BO's P/E ratio is -1436.31. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to FACT.BO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to FACT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check FACT.BO's competition here
BAYERCROP.NS vs FACT.NS Comparison June 2026
BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 192B. In comparison, FACT.NS has a market cap of 566.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,298.40, while FACT.NS trades at ₹901.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.85, whereas FACT.NS's P/E ratio is -1436.15. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to FACT.NS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to FACT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check FACT.NS's competition here
BAYERCROP.NS vs COROMANDEL.NS Comparison June 2026
BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 192B. In comparison, COROMANDEL.NS has a market cap of 532.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,298.40, while COROMANDEL.NS trades at ₹1,880.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.85, whereas COROMANDEL.NS's P/E ratio is 27.23. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to COROMANDEL.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to COROMANDEL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check COROMANDEL.NS's competition here
BAYERCROP.NS vs COROMANDEL.BO Comparison June 2026
BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 192B. In comparison, COROMANDEL.BO has a market cap of 532.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,298.40, while COROMANDEL.BO trades at ₹1,880.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.85, whereas COROMANDEL.BO's P/E ratio is 27.26. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to COROMANDEL.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to COROMANDEL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check COROMANDEL.BO's competition here
BAYERCROP.NS vs UPL.NS Comparison June 2026
BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 192B. In comparison, UPL.NS has a market cap of 530.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,298.40, while UPL.NS trades at ₹611.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.85, whereas UPL.NS's P/E ratio is 28.17. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to UPL.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to UPL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check UPL.NS's competition here
BAYERCROP.NS vs UPL.BO Comparison June 2026
BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 192B. In comparison, UPL.BO has a market cap of 529.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,298.40, while UPL.BO trades at ₹611.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.85, whereas UPL.BO's P/E ratio is 28.12. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to UPL.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to UPL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check UPL.BO's competition here
BAYERCROP.NS vs PIIND.NS Comparison June 2026
BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 192B. In comparison, PIIND.NS has a market cap of 434.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,298.40, while PIIND.NS trades at ₹2,807.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.85, whereas PIIND.NS's P/E ratio is 32.96. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to PIIND.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to PIIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check PIIND.NS's competition here
BAYERCROP.NS vs PIIND.BO Comparison June 2026
BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 192B. In comparison, PIIND.BO has a market cap of 434.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,298.40, while PIIND.BO trades at ₹2,806.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.85, whereas PIIND.BO's P/E ratio is 32.87. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to PIIND.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to PIIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check PIIND.BO's competition here
BAYERCROP.NS vs SUMICHEM.NS Comparison June 2026
BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 192B. In comparison, SUMICHEM.NS has a market cap of 230.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,298.40, while SUMICHEM.NS trades at ₹456.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.85, whereas SUMICHEM.NS's P/E ratio is 42.52. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SUMICHEM.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to SUMICHEM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check SUMICHEM.NS's competition here
BAYERCROP.NS vs SUMICHEM.BO Comparison June 2026
BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 192B. In comparison, SUMICHEM.BO has a market cap of 230.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,298.40, while SUMICHEM.BO trades at ₹457.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.85, whereas SUMICHEM.BO's P/E ratio is 42.43. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SUMICHEM.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to SUMICHEM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check SUMICHEM.BO's competition here
BAYERCROP.NS vs BAYERCROP.BO Comparison June 2026
BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 192B. In comparison, BAYERCROP.BO has a market cap of 192.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,298.40, while BAYERCROP.BO trades at ₹4,300.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.85, whereas BAYERCROP.BO's P/E ratio is 27.95. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BAYERCROP.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to BAYERCROP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check BAYERCROP.BO's competition here
BAYERCROP.NS vs CHAMBLFERT.BO Comparison June 2026
BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 192B. In comparison, CHAMBLFERT.BO has a market cap of 182.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,298.40, while CHAMBLFERT.BO trades at ₹477.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.85, whereas CHAMBLFERT.BO's P/E ratio is 9.78. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CHAMBLFERT.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to CHAMBLFERT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check CHAMBLFERT.BO's competition here
BAYERCROP.NS vs CHAMBLFERT.NS Comparison June 2026
BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 192B. In comparison, CHAMBLFERT.NS has a market cap of 182.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,298.40, while CHAMBLFERT.NS trades at ₹477.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.85, whereas CHAMBLFERT.NS's P/E ratio is 9.32. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CHAMBLFERT.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to CHAMBLFERT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check CHAMBLFERT.NS's competition here
BAYERCROP.NS vs ATUL7.BO Comparison June 2026
BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 192B. In comparison, ATUL7.BO has a market cap of 179B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,298.40, while ATUL7.BO trades at ₹7,100.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.85, whereas ATUL7.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ATUL7.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to ATUL7.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check ATUL7.BO's competition here
BAYERCROP.NS vs EIDPARRY.NS Comparison June 2026
BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 192B. In comparison, EIDPARRY.NS has a market cap of 130.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,298.40, while EIDPARRY.NS trades at ₹723.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.85, whereas EIDPARRY.NS's P/E ratio is 11.02. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to EIDPARRY.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to EIDPARRY.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check EIDPARRY.NS's competition here
BAYERCROP.NS vs EIDPARRY.BO Comparison June 2026
BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 192B. In comparison, EIDPARRY.BO has a market cap of 130.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,298.40, while EIDPARRY.BO trades at ₹723.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.85, whereas EIDPARRY.BO's P/E ratio is 11.37. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to EIDPARRY.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to EIDPARRY.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check EIDPARRY.BO's competition here
BAYERCROP.NS vs PARADEEP.NS Comparison June 2026
BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 192B. In comparison, PARADEEP.NS has a market cap of 103.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,298.40, while PARADEEP.NS trades at ₹123.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.85, whereas PARADEEP.NS's P/E ratio is 13.17. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to PARADEEP.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to PARADEEP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check PARADEEP.NS's competition here
BAYERCROP.NS vs PARADEEP.BO Comparison June 2026
BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 192B. In comparison, PARADEEP.BO has a market cap of 103.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,298.40, while PARADEEP.BO trades at ₹123.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.85, whereas PARADEEP.BO's P/E ratio is 13.16. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to PARADEEP.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to PARADEEP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check PARADEEP.BO's competition here
BAYERCROP.NS vs SHARDACROP.NS Comparison June 2026
BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 192B. In comparison, SHARDACROP.NS has a market cap of 79.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,298.40, while SHARDACROP.NS trades at ₹902.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.85, whereas SHARDACROP.NS's P/E ratio is 11.72. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SHARDACROP.NS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to SHARDACROP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check SHARDACROP.NS's competition here
BAYERCROP.NS vs SHARDACROP.BO Comparison June 2026
BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 192B. In comparison, SHARDACROP.BO has a market cap of 79.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,298.40, while SHARDACROP.BO trades at ₹906.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.85, whereas SHARDACROP.BO's P/E ratio is 11.74. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SHARDACROP.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to SHARDACROP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check SHARDACROP.BO's competition here
BAYERCROP.NS vs RCF.NS Comparison June 2026
BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 192B. In comparison, RCF.NS has a market cap of 69.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,298.40, while RCF.NS trades at ₹125.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.85, whereas RCF.NS's P/E ratio is 16.22. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to RCF.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to RCF.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check RCF.NS's competition here
BAYERCROP.NS vs RCF.BO Comparison June 2026
BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 192B. In comparison, RCF.BO has a market cap of 69.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,298.40, while RCF.BO trades at ₹125.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.85, whereas RCF.BO's P/E ratio is 16.24. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to RCF.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to RCF.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check RCF.BO's competition here
BAYERCROP.NS vs GSFC.NS Comparison June 2026
BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 192B. In comparison, GSFC.NS has a market cap of 65B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,298.40, while GSFC.NS trades at ₹163.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.85, whereas GSFC.NS's P/E ratio is 9.67. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GSFC.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to GSFC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check GSFC.NS's competition here
BAYERCROP.NS vs GSFC.BO Comparison June 2026
BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 192B. In comparison, GSFC.BO has a market cap of 64.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,298.40, while GSFC.BO trades at ₹163.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.85, whereas GSFC.BO's P/E ratio is 9.73. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GSFC.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to GSFC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check GSFC.BO's competition here
BAYERCROP.NS vs PICCADIL.BO Comparison June 2026
BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 192B. In comparison, PICCADIL.BO has a market cap of 57.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,298.40, while PICCADIL.BO trades at ₹577.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.85, whereas PICCADIL.BO's P/E ratio is 41.24. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to PICCADIL.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to PICCADIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check PICCADIL.BO's competition here
BAYERCROP.NS vs DHANUKA.BO Comparison June 2026
BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 192B. In comparison, DHANUKA.BO has a market cap of 49B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,298.40, while DHANUKA.BO trades at ₹1,070.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.85, whereas DHANUKA.BO's P/E ratio is 17.07. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to DHANUKA.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to DHANUKA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check DHANUKA.BO's competition here
BAYERCROP.NS vs DHANUKA.NS Comparison June 2026
BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 192B. In comparison, DHANUKA.NS has a market cap of 49B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,298.40, while DHANUKA.NS trades at ₹1,062.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.85, whereas DHANUKA.NS's P/E ratio is 17.07. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to DHANUKA.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to DHANUKA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check DHANUKA.NS's competition here
BAYERCROP.NS vs MBAPL.NS Comparison June 2026
BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 192B. In comparison, MBAPL.NS has a market cap of 48.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,298.40, while MBAPL.NS trades at ₹556.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.85, whereas MBAPL.NS's P/E ratio is 32.30. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MBAPL.NS's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to MBAPL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check MBAPL.NS's competition here
BAYERCROP.NS vs RALLIS.BO Comparison June 2026
BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 192B. In comparison, RALLIS.BO has a market cap of 45.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,298.40, while RALLIS.BO trades at ₹227.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.85, whereas RALLIS.BO's P/E ratio is 26.90. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to RALLIS.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to RALLIS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check RALLIS.BO's competition here
BAYERCROP.NS vs RALLIS.NS Comparison June 2026
BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 192B. In comparison, RALLIS.NS has a market cap of 44.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,298.40, while RALLIS.NS trades at ₹226.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.85, whereas RALLIS.NS's P/E ratio is 24.42. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to RALLIS.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to RALLIS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check RALLIS.NS's competition here
BAYERCROP.NS vs KSCL.NS Comparison June 2026
BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 192B. In comparison, KSCL.NS has a market cap of 44.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,298.40, while KSCL.NS trades at ₹876.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.85, whereas KSCL.NS's P/E ratio is 15.27. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to KSCL.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to KSCL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check KSCL.NS's competition here
BAYERCROP.NS vs KSCL.BO Comparison June 2026
BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 192B. In comparison, KSCL.BO has a market cap of 44.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,298.40, while KSCL.BO trades at ₹875.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.85, whereas KSCL.BO's P/E ratio is 15.29. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to KSCL.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to KSCL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check KSCL.BO's competition here
BAYERCROP.NS vs KRISHANA.NS Comparison June 2026
BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 192B. In comparison, KRISHANA.NS has a market cap of 41.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,298.40, while KRISHANA.NS trades at ₹665.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.85, whereas KRISHANA.NS's P/E ratio is 23.25. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to KRISHANA.NS's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to KRISHANA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check KRISHANA.NS's competition here
BAYERCROP.NS vs CIANAGRO.BO Comparison June 2026
BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 192B. In comparison, CIANAGRO.BO has a market cap of 40B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,298.40, while CIANAGRO.BO trades at ₹1,393.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.85, whereas CIANAGRO.BO's P/E ratio is 35.55. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CIANAGRO.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to CIANAGRO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check CIANAGRO.BO's competition here
BAYERCROP.NS vs MANGCHEFER.NS Comparison June 2026
BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 192B. In comparison, MANGCHEFER.NS has a market cap of 36.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,298.40, while MANGCHEFER.NS trades at ₹308.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.85, whereas MANGCHEFER.NS's P/E ratio is 22.67. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MANGCHEFER.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to MANGCHEFER.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check MANGCHEFER.NS's competition here
BAYERCROP.NS vs MANGCHEFER.BO Comparison June 2026
BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 192B. In comparison, MANGCHEFER.BO has a market cap of 36.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,298.40, while MANGCHEFER.BO trades at ₹308.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.85, whereas MANGCHEFER.BO's P/E ratio is 22.63. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MANGCHEFER.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to MANGCHEFER.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check MANGCHEFER.BO's competition here
BAYERCROP.NS vs NFL.NS Comparison June 2026
BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 192B. In comparison, NFL.NS has a market cap of 36.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,298.40, while NFL.NS trades at ₹75.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.85, whereas NFL.NS's P/E ratio is 17.25. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NFL.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to NFL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check NFL.NS's competition here
BAYERCROP.NS vs NFL.BO Comparison June 2026
BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 192B. In comparison, NFL.BO has a market cap of 36.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,298.40, while NFL.BO trades at ₹75.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.85, whereas NFL.BO's P/E ratio is 17.26. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NFL.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to NFL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check NFL.BO's competition here
BAYERCROP.NS vs BNHOLDINGS.BO Comparison June 2026
BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 192B. In comparison, BNHOLDINGS.BO has a market cap of 34.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,298.40, while BNHOLDINGS.BO trades at ₹355.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.85, whereas BNHOLDINGS.BO's P/E ratio is 26.71. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BNHOLDINGS.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to BNHOLDINGS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check BNHOLDINGS.BO's competition here
BAYERCROP.NS vs NACLIND.NS Comparison June 2026
BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 192B. In comparison, NACLIND.NS has a market cap of 33.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,298.40, while NACLIND.NS trades at ₹164.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.85, whereas NACLIND.NS's P/E ratio is 857.10. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NACLIND.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to NACLIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check NACLIND.NS's competition here
BAYERCROP.NS vs BHAGCHEM.NS Comparison June 2026
BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 192B. In comparison, BHAGCHEM.NS has a market cap of 33.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,298.40, while BHAGCHEM.NS trades at ₹267.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.85, whereas BHAGCHEM.NS's P/E ratio is 234.45. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BHAGCHEM.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to BHAGCHEM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check BHAGCHEM.NS's competition here
BAYERCROP.NS vs BHAGCHEM.BO Comparison June 2026
BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 192B. In comparison, BHAGCHEM.BO has a market cap of 33.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,298.40, while BHAGCHEM.BO trades at ₹267.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.85, whereas BHAGCHEM.BO's P/E ratio is 233.65. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BHAGCHEM.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to BHAGCHEM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check BHAGCHEM.BO's competition here
BAYERCROP.NS vs NACLIND.BO Comparison June 2026
BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 192B. In comparison, NACLIND.BO has a market cap of 33.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,298.40, while NACLIND.BO trades at ₹164.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.85, whereas NACLIND.BO's P/E ratio is 851.50. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NACLIND.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to NACLIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check NACLIND.BO's competition here
BAYERCROP.NS vs VENKYS.BO Comparison June 2026
BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 192B. In comparison, VENKYS.BO has a market cap of 24.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,298.40, while VENKYS.BO trades at ₹1,714.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.85, whereas VENKYS.BO's P/E ratio is -57.49. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to VENKYS.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to VENKYS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check VENKYS.BO's competition here
BAYERCROP.NS vs KSE.NS Comparison June 2026
BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 192B. In comparison, KSE.NS has a market cap of 22.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,298.40, while KSE.NS trades at ₹697.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.85, whereas KSE.NS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to KSE.NS's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is more volatile compared to KSE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check KSE.NS's competition here
BAYERCROP.NS vs INSECTICID.BO Comparison June 2026
BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 192B. In comparison, INSECTICID.BO has a market cap of 21.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,298.40, while INSECTICID.BO trades at ₹704.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.85, whereas INSECTICID.BO's P/E ratio is 15.12. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to INSECTICID.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to INSECTICID.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check INSECTICID.BO's competition here
BAYERCROP.NS vs INSECTICID.NS Comparison June 2026
BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 192B. In comparison, INSECTICID.NS has a market cap of 21.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,298.40, while INSECTICID.NS trades at ₹707.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.85, whereas INSECTICID.NS's P/E ratio is 15.14. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to INSECTICID.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to INSECTICID.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check INSECTICID.NS's competition here
BAYERCROP.NS vs IPL.NS Comparison June 2026
BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 192B. In comparison, IPL.NS has a market cap of 18.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,298.40, while IPL.NS trades at ₹159.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.85, whereas IPL.NS's P/E ratio is 15.55. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to IPL.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to IPL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check IPL.NS's competition here
BAYERCROP.NS vs IPL.BO Comparison June 2026
BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 192B. In comparison, IPL.BO has a market cap of 18.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,298.40, while IPL.BO trades at ₹159.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.85, whereas IPL.BO's P/E ratio is 15.54. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to IPL.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to IPL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check IPL.BO's competition here
BAYERCROP.NS vs ASTEC.NS Comparison June 2026
BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 192B. In comparison, ASTEC.NS has a market cap of 17.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,298.40, while ASTEC.NS trades at ₹775.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.85, whereas ASTEC.NS's P/E ratio is -21.01. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ASTEC.NS's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to ASTEC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check ASTEC.NS's competition here
BAYERCROP.NS vs ASTEC.BO Comparison June 2026
BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 192B. In comparison, ASTEC.BO has a market cap of 17.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,298.40, while ASTEC.BO trades at ₹777.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.85, whereas ASTEC.BO's P/E ratio is -20.98. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ASTEC.BO's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to ASTEC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check ASTEC.BO's competition here
BAYERCROP.NS vs SPIC.BO Comparison June 2026
BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 192B. In comparison, SPIC.BO has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,298.40, while SPIC.BO trades at ₹67.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.85, whereas SPIC.BO's P/E ratio is 7.56. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SPIC.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to SPIC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check SPIC.BO's competition here
BAYERCROP.NS vs SPIC.NS Comparison June 2026
BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 192B. In comparison, SPIC.NS has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,298.40, while SPIC.NS trades at ₹67.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.85, whereas SPIC.NS's P/E ratio is 6.63. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SPIC.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to SPIC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check SPIC.NS's competition here
BAYERCROP.NS vs MOL.BO Comparison June 2026
BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 192B. In comparison, MOL.BO has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,298.40, while MOL.BO trades at ₹46.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.85, whereas MOL.BO's P/E ratio is 42.50. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MOL.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to MOL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check MOL.BO's competition here
BAYERCROP.NS vs MOL.NS Comparison June 2026
BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 192B. In comparison, MOL.NS has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,298.40, while MOL.NS trades at ₹46.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.85, whereas MOL.NS's P/E ratio is 42.46. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MOL.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to MOL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check MOL.NS's competition here
BAYERCROP.NS vs BHARATRAS.BO Comparison June 2026
BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 192B. In comparison, BHARATRAS.BO has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,298.40, while BHARATRAS.BO trades at ₹1,383.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.85, whereas BHARATRAS.BO's P/E ratio is 17.57. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BHARATRAS.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to BHARATRAS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check BHARATRAS.BO's competition here
BAYERCROP.NS vs BHARATRAS.NS Comparison June 2026
BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 192B. In comparison, BHARATRAS.NS has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,298.40, while BHARATRAS.NS trades at ₹1,384.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.85, whereas BHARATRAS.NS's P/E ratio is 17.64. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BHARATRAS.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to BHARATRAS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check BHARATRAS.NS's competition here
BAYERCROP.NS vs MADRASFERT.NS Comparison June 2026
BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 192B. In comparison, MADRASFERT.NS has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,298.40, while MADRASFERT.NS trades at ₹67.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.85, whereas MADRASFERT.NS's P/E ratio is 13.74. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MADRASFERT.NS's ROE of +6.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to MADRASFERT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check MADRASFERT.NS's competition here
BAYERCROP.NS vs MADRASFERT.BO Comparison June 2026
BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 192B. In comparison, MADRASFERT.BO has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,298.40, while MADRASFERT.BO trades at ₹67.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.85, whereas MADRASFERT.BO's P/E ratio is 13.73. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MADRASFERT.BO's ROE of +6.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to MADRASFERT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check MADRASFERT.BO's competition here
BAYERCROP.NS vs BSHSL.NS Comparison June 2026
BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 192B. In comparison, BSHSL.NS has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,298.40, while BSHSL.NS trades at ₹94.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.85, whereas BSHSL.NS's P/E ratio is 37.80. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BSHSL.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to BSHSL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check BSHSL.NS's competition here
BAYERCROP.NS vs DHARMAJ.BO Comparison June 2026
BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 192B. In comparison, DHARMAJ.BO has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,298.40, while DHARMAJ.BO trades at ₹273.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.85, whereas DHARMAJ.BO's P/E ratio is 16.97. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to DHARMAJ.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to DHARMAJ.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check DHARMAJ.BO's competition here
BAYERCROP.NS vs DHARMAJ.NS Comparison June 2026
BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 192B. In comparison, DHARMAJ.NS has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,298.40, while DHARMAJ.NS trades at ₹275.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.85, whereas DHARMAJ.NS's P/E ratio is 16.95. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to DHARMAJ.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to DHARMAJ.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check DHARMAJ.NS's competition here
BAYERCROP.NS vs ZUARI.NS Comparison June 2026
BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 192B. In comparison, ZUARI.NS has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,298.40, while ZUARI.NS trades at ₹215.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.85, whereas ZUARI.NS's P/E ratio is 0.99. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ZUARI.NS's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to ZUARI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check ZUARI.NS's competition here
BAYERCROP.NS vs ZUARI.BO Comparison June 2026
BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 192B. In comparison, ZUARI.BO has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,298.40, while ZUARI.BO trades at ₹215.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.85, whereas ZUARI.BO's P/E ratio is 0.98. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ZUARI.BO's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to ZUARI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check ZUARI.BO's competition here
BAYERCROP.NS vs BLUECLOUDS.BO Comparison June 2026
BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 192B. In comparison, BLUECLOUDS.BO has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,298.40, while BLUECLOUDS.BO trades at ₹17.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.85, whereas BLUECLOUDS.BO's P/E ratio is 16.14. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BLUECLOUDS.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to BLUECLOUDS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check BLUECLOUDS.BO's competition here
BAYERCROP.NS vs BAJAJST.BO Comparison June 2026
BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 192B. In comparison, BAJAJST.BO has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,298.40, while BAJAJST.BO trades at ₹368.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.85, whereas BAJAJST.BO's P/E ratio is 20.82. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BAJAJST.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to BAJAJST.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check BAJAJST.BO's competition here
BAYERCROP.NS vs HERANBA.NS Comparison June 2026
BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 192B. In comparison, HERANBA.NS has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,298.40, while HERANBA.NS trades at ₹187.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.85, whereas HERANBA.NS's P/E ratio is -9.49. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to HERANBA.NS's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to HERANBA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check HERANBA.NS's competition here
BAYERCROP.NS vs HERANBA.BO Comparison June 2026
BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 192B. In comparison, HERANBA.BO has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,298.40, while HERANBA.BO trades at ₹188.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.85, whereas HERANBA.BO's P/E ratio is -9.43. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to HERANBA.BO's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to HERANBA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check HERANBA.BO's competition here
BAYERCROP.NS vs SHINDL.BO Comparison June 2026
BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 192B. In comparison, SHINDL.BO has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,298.40, while SHINDL.BO trades at ₹157.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.85, whereas SHINDL.BO's P/E ratio is 38.00. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SHINDL.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to SHINDL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check SHINDL.BO's competition here
BAYERCROP.NS vs KSE.BO Comparison June 2026
BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 192B. In comparison, KSE.BO has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,298.40, while KSE.BO trades at ₹189.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.85, whereas KSE.BO's P/E ratio is 7.20. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to KSE.BO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to KSE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check KSE.BO's competition here
BAYERCROP.NS vs BESTAGRO.BO Comparison June 2026
BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 192B. In comparison, BESTAGRO.BO has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,298.40, while BESTAGRO.BO trades at ₹15.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.85, whereas BESTAGRO.BO's P/E ratio is 64.40. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BESTAGRO.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to BESTAGRO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check BESTAGRO.BO's competition here
BAYERCROP.NS vs BESTAGRO.NS Comparison June 2026
BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 192B. In comparison, BESTAGRO.NS has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,298.40, while BESTAGRO.NS trades at ₹15.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.85, whereas BESTAGRO.NS's P/E ratio is 64.28. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BESTAGRO.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to BESTAGRO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check BESTAGRO.NS's competition here
BAYERCROP.NS vs MODINATUR.BO Comparison June 2026
BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 192B. In comparison, MODINATUR.BO has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,298.40, while MODINATUR.BO trades at ₹407.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.85, whereas MODINATUR.BO's P/E ratio is 11.16. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MODINATUR.BO's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to MODINATUR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check MODINATUR.BO's competition here
BAYERCROP.NS vs SVRL.BO Comparison June 2026
BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 192B. In comparison, SVRL.BO has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,298.40, while SVRL.BO trades at ₹251.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.85, whereas SVRL.BO's P/E ratio is 14.48. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SVRL.BO's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is more volatile compared to SVRL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check SVRL.BO's competition here
BAYERCROP.NS vs KHAICHEM.BO Comparison June 2026
BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 192B. In comparison, KHAICHEM.BO has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,298.40, while KHAICHEM.BO trades at ₹55.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.85, whereas KHAICHEM.BO's P/E ratio is 7.82. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to KHAICHEM.BO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to KHAICHEM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check KHAICHEM.BO's competition here
BAYERCROP.NS vs KHAICHEM.NS Comparison June 2026
BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 192B. In comparison, KHAICHEM.NS has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,298.40, while KHAICHEM.NS trades at ₹54.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.85, whereas KHAICHEM.NS's P/E ratio is 7.76. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to KHAICHEM.NS's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to KHAICHEM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check KHAICHEM.NS's competition here
BAYERCROP.NS vs KNAGRI.NS Comparison June 2026
BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 192B. In comparison, KNAGRI.NS has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,298.40, while KNAGRI.NS trades at ₹190.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.85, whereas KNAGRI.NS's P/E ratio is 12.92. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to KNAGRI.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to KNAGRI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check KNAGRI.NS's competition here
BAYERCROP.NS vs RAMAPHO.NS Comparison June 2026
BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 192B. In comparison, RAMAPHO.NS has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,298.40, while RAMAPHO.NS trades at ₹121.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.85, whereas RAMAPHO.NS's P/E ratio is 8.02. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to RAMAPHO.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to RAMAPHO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check RAMAPHO.NS's competition here
BAYERCROP.NS vs RAMAPHO.BO Comparison June 2026
BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 192B. In comparison, RAMAPHO.BO has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,298.40, while RAMAPHO.BO trades at ₹120.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.85, whereas RAMAPHO.BO's P/E ratio is 7.99. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to RAMAPHO.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to RAMAPHO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check RAMAPHO.BO's competition here
BAYERCROP.NS vs MISHTANN.BO Comparison June 2026
BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 192B. In comparison, MISHTANN.BO has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,298.40, while MISHTANN.BO trades at ₹3.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.85, whereas MISHTANN.BO's P/E ratio is 1.59. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MISHTANN.BO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to MISHTANN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check MISHTANN.BO's competition here
BAYERCROP.NS vs ARIES.BO Comparison June 2026
BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 192B. In comparison, ARIES.BO has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,298.40, while ARIES.BO trades at ₹327.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.85, whereas ARIES.BO's P/E ratio is 9.71. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ARIES.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to ARIES.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check ARIES.BO's competition here
BAYERCROP.NS vs ARIES.NS Comparison June 2026
BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 192B. In comparison, ARIES.NS has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,298.40, while ARIES.NS trades at ₹326.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.85, whereas ARIES.NS's P/E ratio is 9.69. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ARIES.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to ARIES.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check ARIES.NS's competition here
BAYERCROP.NS vs GOODRICKE.BO Comparison June 2026
BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 192B. In comparison, GOODRICKE.BO has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,298.40, while GOODRICKE.BO trades at ₹175.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.85, whereas GOODRICKE.BO's P/E ratio is 14.91. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GOODRICKE.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to GOODRICKE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check GOODRICKE.BO's competition here
BAYERCROP.NS vs IGCL.NS Comparison June 2026
BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 192B. In comparison, IGCL.NS has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,298.40, while IGCL.NS trades at ₹58.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.85, whereas IGCL.NS's P/E ratio is 8.79. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to IGCL.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to IGCL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check IGCL.NS's competition here
BAYERCROP.NS vs NATHBIOGEN.NS Comparison June 2026
BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 192B. In comparison, NATHBIOGEN.NS has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,298.40, while NATHBIOGEN.NS trades at ₹169.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.85, whereas NATHBIOGEN.NS's P/E ratio is 8.07. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NATHBIOGEN.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to NATHBIOGEN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check NATHBIOGEN.NS's competition here
BAYERCROP.NS vs NATHBIOGEN.BO Comparison June 2026
BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 192B. In comparison, NATHBIOGEN.BO has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,298.40, while NATHBIOGEN.BO trades at ₹169.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.85, whereas NATHBIOGEN.BO's P/E ratio is 8.02. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NATHBIOGEN.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is more volatile compared to NATHBIOGEN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check NATHBIOGEN.BO's competition here
BAYERCROP.NS vs KINGSINFR.BO Comparison June 2026
BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 192B. In comparison, KINGSINFR.BO has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,298.40, while KINGSINFR.BO trades at ₹127.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.85, whereas KINGSINFR.BO's P/E ratio is 19.32. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to KINGSINFR.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to KINGSINFR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check KINGSINFR.BO's competition here
BAYERCROP.NS vs SBECSUG.BO Comparison June 2026
BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 192B. In comparison, SBECSUG.BO has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,298.40, while SBECSUG.BO trades at ₹63.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.85, whereas SBECSUG.BO's P/E ratio is 15.39. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SBECSUG.BO's ROE of -1.29%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is more volatile compared to SBECSUG.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check SBECSUG.BO's competition here
BAYERCROP.NS vs HOACFOODS.NS Comparison June 2026
BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 192B. In comparison, HOACFOODS.NS has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,298.40, while HOACFOODS.NS trades at ₹618.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.85, whereas HOACFOODS.NS's P/E ratio is 96.00. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to HOACFOODS.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to HOACFOODS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check HOACFOODS.NS's competition here
BAYERCROP.NS vs NOVAAGRI.NS Comparison June 2026
BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 192B. In comparison, NOVAAGRI.NS has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,298.40, while NOVAAGRI.NS trades at ₹28.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.85, whereas NOVAAGRI.NS's P/E ratio is 19.44. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NOVAAGRI.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to NOVAAGRI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check NOVAAGRI.NS's competition here
BAYERCROP.NS vs NAGAFERT.BO Comparison June 2026
BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 192B. In comparison, NAGAFERT.BO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,298.40, while NAGAFERT.BO trades at ₹3.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.85, whereas NAGAFERT.BO's P/E ratio is -8.09. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NAGAFERT.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to NAGAFERT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check NAGAFERT.BO's competition here
BAYERCROP.NS vs NAGAFERT.NS Comparison June 2026
BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 192B. In comparison, NAGAFERT.NS has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,298.40, while NAGAFERT.NS trades at ₹3.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.85, whereas NAGAFERT.NS's P/E ratio is -7.87. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NAGAFERT.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to NAGAFERT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check NAGAFERT.NS's competition here
BAYERCROP.NS vs RBS.NS Comparison June 2026
BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 192B. In comparison, RBS.NS has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,298.40, while RBS.NS trades at ₹87.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.85, whereas RBS.NS's P/E ratio is 13.12. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to RBS.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to RBS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check RBS.NS's competition here
BAYERCROP.NS vs VIJSOLX.BO Comparison June 2026
BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 192B. In comparison, VIJSOLX.BO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,298.40, while VIJSOLX.BO trades at ₹608.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.85, whereas VIJSOLX.BO's P/E ratio is 10.34. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to VIJSOLX.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to VIJSOLX.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check VIJSOLX.BO's competition here
BAYERCROP.NS vs INDOUS.NS Comparison June 2026
BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 192B. In comparison, INDOUS.NS has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,298.40, while INDOUS.NS trades at ₹92.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.85, whereas INDOUS.NS's P/E ratio is 14.61. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to INDOUS.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to INDOUS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check INDOUS.NS's competition here
BAYERCROP.NS vs INDOUS.BO Comparison June 2026
BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 192B. In comparison, INDOUS.BO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,298.40, while INDOUS.BO trades at ₹93.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.85, whereas INDOUS.BO's P/E ratio is 14.59. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to INDOUS.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to INDOUS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check INDOUS.BO's competition here
BAYERCROP.NS vs EQUIPPP.NS Comparison June 2026
BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 192B. In comparison, EQUIPPP.NS has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,298.40, while EQUIPPP.NS trades at ₹17.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.85, whereas EQUIPPP.NS's P/E ratio is 95.28. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to EQUIPPP.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to EQUIPPP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check EQUIPPP.NS's competition here
BAYERCROP.NS vs EQUIPPP.BO Comparison June 2026
BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 192B. In comparison, EQUIPPP.BO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,298.40, while EQUIPPP.BO trades at ₹17.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.85, whereas EQUIPPP.BO's P/E ratio is 96.61. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to EQUIPPP.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to EQUIPPP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check EQUIPPP.BO's competition here
BAYERCROP.NS vs BHARATAGRI.BO Comparison June 2026
BAYERCROP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BAYERCROP.NS stands at 192B. In comparison, BHARATAGRI.BO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BAYERCROP.NS is priced at ₹4,298.40, while BHARATAGRI.BO trades at ₹29.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BAYERCROP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.85, whereas BHARATAGRI.BO's P/E ratio is -32.43. In terms of profitability, BAYERCROP.NS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BHARATAGRI.BO's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BAYERCROP.NS is less volatile compared to BHARATAGRI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BAYERCROP.NS.Check BHARATAGRI.BO's competition here