Khaitan Chemicals and Fertilizers Limited
Khaitan Chemicals and Fertilizers Limited (KHAICHEM.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (KHAICHEM.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Agricultural Inputs Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KHAICHEM.NS | ₹56.87 | +7.83% | 5.2B | 7.26 | ₹7.42 | N/A |
| COROMANDEL.BO | ₹2,099.00 | -2.08% | 635.1B | 26.53 | ₹81.24 | +0.84% |
| COROMANDEL.NS | ₹2,107.20 | -1.82% | 635.1B | 26.14 | ₹82.42 | +0.84% |
| FACT.NS | ₹846.95 | -1.63% | 554.9B | 1824.68 | ₹0.47 | +0.05% |
| FACT.BO | ₹845.85 | -1.69% | 554.8B | 1786.25 | ₹0.48 | +0.05% |
| UPL.NS | ₹641.70 | -0.05% | 544.4B | 30.77 | ₹20.96 | +0.93% |
| PIIND.BO | ₹2,929.35 | +1.74% | 447.9B | 30.87 | ₹95.65 | +0.51% |
| PIIND.NS | ₹2,924.40 | +1.52% | 447.8B | 30.82 | ₹95.77 | +0.51% |
| BAYERCROP.NS | ₹4,946.00 | +2.85% | 216B | 32.23 | ₹149.08 | +2.60% |
| SUMICHEM.NS | ₹423.80 | +2.08% | 208.9B | 39.23 | ₹10.67 | +0.29% |
Stock Comparison
KHAICHEM.NS vs COROMANDEL.BO Comparison April 2026
KHAICHEM.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHAICHEM.NS stands at 5.2B. In comparison, COROMANDEL.BO has a market cap of 635.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KHAICHEM.NS is priced at ₹56.87, while COROMANDEL.BO trades at ₹2,099.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHAICHEM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas COROMANDEL.BO's P/E ratio is 26.53. In terms of profitability, KHAICHEM.NS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to COROMANDEL.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KHAICHEM.NS is more volatile compared to COROMANDEL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHAICHEM.NS.Check COROMANDEL.BO's competition here
KHAICHEM.NS vs COROMANDEL.NS Comparison April 2026
KHAICHEM.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHAICHEM.NS stands at 5.2B. In comparison, COROMANDEL.NS has a market cap of 635.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KHAICHEM.NS is priced at ₹56.87, while COROMANDEL.NS trades at ₹2,107.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHAICHEM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas COROMANDEL.NS's P/E ratio is 26.14. In terms of profitability, KHAICHEM.NS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to COROMANDEL.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KHAICHEM.NS is more volatile compared to COROMANDEL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHAICHEM.NS.Check COROMANDEL.NS's competition here
KHAICHEM.NS vs FACT.NS Comparison April 2026
KHAICHEM.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHAICHEM.NS stands at 5.2B. In comparison, FACT.NS has a market cap of 554.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KHAICHEM.NS is priced at ₹56.87, while FACT.NS trades at ₹846.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHAICHEM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas FACT.NS's P/E ratio is 1824.68. In terms of profitability, KHAICHEM.NS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to FACT.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KHAICHEM.NS is more volatile compared to FACT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHAICHEM.NS.Check FACT.NS's competition here
KHAICHEM.NS vs FACT.BO Comparison April 2026
KHAICHEM.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHAICHEM.NS stands at 5.2B. In comparison, FACT.BO has a market cap of 554.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KHAICHEM.NS is priced at ₹56.87, while FACT.BO trades at ₹845.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHAICHEM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas FACT.BO's P/E ratio is 1786.25. In terms of profitability, KHAICHEM.NS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to FACT.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KHAICHEM.NS is more volatile compared to FACT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHAICHEM.NS.Check FACT.BO's competition here
KHAICHEM.NS vs UPL.NS Comparison April 2026
KHAICHEM.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHAICHEM.NS stands at 5.2B. In comparison, UPL.NS has a market cap of 544.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KHAICHEM.NS is priced at ₹56.87, while UPL.NS trades at ₹641.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHAICHEM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas UPL.NS's P/E ratio is 30.77. In terms of profitability, KHAICHEM.NS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to UPL.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KHAICHEM.NS is more volatile compared to UPL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHAICHEM.NS.Check UPL.NS's competition here
KHAICHEM.NS vs PIIND.BO Comparison April 2026
KHAICHEM.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHAICHEM.NS stands at 5.2B. In comparison, PIIND.BO has a market cap of 447.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KHAICHEM.NS is priced at ₹56.87, while PIIND.BO trades at ₹2,929.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHAICHEM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas PIIND.BO's P/E ratio is 30.87. In terms of profitability, KHAICHEM.NS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to PIIND.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KHAICHEM.NS is more volatile compared to PIIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHAICHEM.NS.Check PIIND.BO's competition here
KHAICHEM.NS vs PIIND.NS Comparison April 2026
KHAICHEM.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHAICHEM.NS stands at 5.2B. In comparison, PIIND.NS has a market cap of 447.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KHAICHEM.NS is priced at ₹56.87, while PIIND.NS trades at ₹2,924.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHAICHEM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas PIIND.NS's P/E ratio is 30.82. In terms of profitability, KHAICHEM.NS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to PIIND.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KHAICHEM.NS is more volatile compared to PIIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHAICHEM.NS.Check PIIND.NS's competition here
KHAICHEM.NS vs BAYERCROP.NS Comparison April 2026
KHAICHEM.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHAICHEM.NS stands at 5.2B. In comparison, BAYERCROP.NS has a market cap of 216B. Regarding current trading prices, KHAICHEM.NS is priced at ₹56.87, while BAYERCROP.NS trades at ₹4,946.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHAICHEM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas BAYERCROP.NS's P/E ratio is 32.23. In terms of profitability, KHAICHEM.NS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to BAYERCROP.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, KHAICHEM.NS is more volatile compared to BAYERCROP.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHAICHEM.NS.Check BAYERCROP.NS's competition here
KHAICHEM.NS vs SUMICHEM.NS Comparison April 2026
KHAICHEM.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHAICHEM.NS stands at 5.2B. In comparison, SUMICHEM.NS has a market cap of 208.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KHAICHEM.NS is priced at ₹56.87, while SUMICHEM.NS trades at ₹423.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHAICHEM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas SUMICHEM.NS's P/E ratio is 39.23. In terms of profitability, KHAICHEM.NS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to SUMICHEM.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KHAICHEM.NS is more volatile compared to SUMICHEM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHAICHEM.NS.Check SUMICHEM.NS's competition here
KHAICHEM.NS vs SUMICHEM.BO Comparison April 2026
KHAICHEM.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHAICHEM.NS stands at 5.2B. In comparison, SUMICHEM.BO has a market cap of 208.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KHAICHEM.NS is priced at ₹56.87, while SUMICHEM.BO trades at ₹422.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHAICHEM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas SUMICHEM.BO's P/E ratio is 39.33. In terms of profitability, KHAICHEM.NS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to SUMICHEM.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KHAICHEM.NS is more volatile compared to SUMICHEM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHAICHEM.NS.Check SUMICHEM.BO's competition here
KHAICHEM.NS vs CHAMBLFERT.NS Comparison April 2026
KHAICHEM.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHAICHEM.NS stands at 5.2B. In comparison, CHAMBLFERT.NS has a market cap of 183B. Regarding current trading prices, KHAICHEM.NS is priced at ₹56.87, while CHAMBLFERT.NS trades at ₹456.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHAICHEM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas CHAMBLFERT.NS's P/E ratio is 9.56. In terms of profitability, KHAICHEM.NS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to CHAMBLFERT.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KHAICHEM.NS is more volatile compared to CHAMBLFERT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHAICHEM.NS.Check CHAMBLFERT.NS's competition here
KHAICHEM.NS vs CHAMBLFERT.BO Comparison April 2026
KHAICHEM.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHAICHEM.NS stands at 5.2B. In comparison, CHAMBLFERT.BO has a market cap of 182.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KHAICHEM.NS is priced at ₹56.87, while CHAMBLFERT.BO trades at ₹455.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHAICHEM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas CHAMBLFERT.BO's P/E ratio is 9.82. In terms of profitability, KHAICHEM.NS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to CHAMBLFERT.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KHAICHEM.NS is more volatile compared to CHAMBLFERT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHAICHEM.NS.Check CHAMBLFERT.BO's competition here
KHAICHEM.NS vs ATUL7.BO Comparison April 2026
KHAICHEM.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHAICHEM.NS stands at 5.2B. In comparison, ATUL7.BO has a market cap of 179B. Regarding current trading prices, KHAICHEM.NS is priced at ₹56.87, while ATUL7.BO trades at ₹7,100.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHAICHEM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas ATUL7.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KHAICHEM.NS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ATUL7.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KHAICHEM.NS is more volatile compared to ATUL7.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHAICHEM.NS.Check ATUL7.BO's competition here
KHAICHEM.NS vs EIDPARRY.BO Comparison April 2026
KHAICHEM.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHAICHEM.NS stands at 5.2B. In comparison, EIDPARRY.BO has a market cap of 151.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KHAICHEM.NS is priced at ₹56.87, while EIDPARRY.BO trades at ₹857.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHAICHEM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas EIDPARRY.BO's P/E ratio is 13.19. In terms of profitability, KHAICHEM.NS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to EIDPARRY.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KHAICHEM.NS is more volatile compared to EIDPARRY.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHAICHEM.NS.Check EIDPARRY.BO's competition here
KHAICHEM.NS vs PARADEEP.NS Comparison April 2026
KHAICHEM.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHAICHEM.NS stands at 5.2B. In comparison, PARADEEP.NS has a market cap of 98.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KHAICHEM.NS is priced at ₹56.87, while PARADEEP.NS trades at ₹120.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHAICHEM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas PARADEEP.NS's P/E ratio is 11.95. In terms of profitability, KHAICHEM.NS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to PARADEEP.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, KHAICHEM.NS is more volatile compared to PARADEEP.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHAICHEM.NS.Check PARADEEP.NS's competition here
KHAICHEM.NS vs PARADEEP.BO Comparison April 2026
KHAICHEM.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHAICHEM.NS stands at 5.2B. In comparison, PARADEEP.BO has a market cap of 98.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KHAICHEM.NS is priced at ₹56.87, while PARADEEP.BO trades at ₹119.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHAICHEM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas PARADEEP.BO's P/E ratio is 12.15. In terms of profitability, KHAICHEM.NS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to PARADEEP.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, KHAICHEM.NS is more volatile compared to PARADEEP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHAICHEM.NS.Check PARADEEP.BO's competition here
KHAICHEM.NS vs SHARDACROP.NS Comparison April 2026
KHAICHEM.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHAICHEM.NS stands at 5.2B. In comparison, SHARDACROP.NS has a market cap of 95.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KHAICHEM.NS is priced at ₹56.87, while SHARDACROP.NS trades at ₹1,053.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHAICHEM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas SHARDACROP.NS's P/E ratio is 16.87. In terms of profitability, KHAICHEM.NS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to SHARDACROP.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, KHAICHEM.NS is more volatile compared to SHARDACROP.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHAICHEM.NS.Check SHARDACROP.NS's competition here
KHAICHEM.NS vs SHARDACROP.BO Comparison April 2026
KHAICHEM.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHAICHEM.NS stands at 5.2B. In comparison, SHARDACROP.BO has a market cap of 95.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KHAICHEM.NS is priced at ₹56.87, while SHARDACROP.BO trades at ₹1,051.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHAICHEM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas SHARDACROP.BO's P/E ratio is 17.11. In terms of profitability, KHAICHEM.NS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to SHARDACROP.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, KHAICHEM.NS is more volatile compared to SHARDACROP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHAICHEM.NS.Check SHARDACROP.BO's competition here
KHAICHEM.NS vs RCF.NS Comparison April 2026
KHAICHEM.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHAICHEM.NS stands at 5.2B. In comparison, RCF.NS has a market cap of 70.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KHAICHEM.NS is priced at ₹56.87, while RCF.NS trades at ₹126.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHAICHEM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas RCF.NS's P/E ratio is 22.61. In terms of profitability, KHAICHEM.NS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to RCF.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KHAICHEM.NS is more volatile compared to RCF.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHAICHEM.NS.Check RCF.NS's competition here
KHAICHEM.NS vs RCF.BO Comparison April 2026
KHAICHEM.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHAICHEM.NS stands at 5.2B. In comparison, RCF.BO has a market cap of 70.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KHAICHEM.NS is priced at ₹56.87, while RCF.BO trades at ₹126.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHAICHEM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas RCF.BO's P/E ratio is 22.61. In terms of profitability, KHAICHEM.NS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to RCF.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KHAICHEM.NS is more volatile compared to RCF.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHAICHEM.NS.Check RCF.BO's competition here
KHAICHEM.NS vs GSFC.NS Comparison April 2026
KHAICHEM.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHAICHEM.NS stands at 5.2B. In comparison, GSFC.NS has a market cap of 65.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KHAICHEM.NS is priced at ₹56.87, while GSFC.NS trades at ₹168.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHAICHEM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas GSFC.NS's P/E ratio is 9.42. In terms of profitability, KHAICHEM.NS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to GSFC.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KHAICHEM.NS is more volatile compared to GSFC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHAICHEM.NS.Check GSFC.NS's competition here
KHAICHEM.NS vs GSFC.BO Comparison April 2026
KHAICHEM.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHAICHEM.NS stands at 5.2B. In comparison, GSFC.BO has a market cap of 65.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KHAICHEM.NS is priced at ₹56.87, while GSFC.BO trades at ₹168.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHAICHEM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas GSFC.BO's P/E ratio is 9.77. In terms of profitability, KHAICHEM.NS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to GSFC.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KHAICHEM.NS is more volatile compared to GSFC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHAICHEM.NS.Check GSFC.BO's competition here
KHAICHEM.NS vs PICCADIL.BO Comparison April 2026
KHAICHEM.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHAICHEM.NS stands at 5.2B. In comparison, PICCADIL.BO has a market cap of 56.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KHAICHEM.NS is priced at ₹56.87, while PICCADIL.BO trades at ₹562.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHAICHEM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas PICCADIL.BO's P/E ratio is 41.33. In terms of profitability, KHAICHEM.NS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to PICCADIL.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KHAICHEM.NS is more volatile compared to PICCADIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHAICHEM.NS.Check PICCADIL.BO's competition here
KHAICHEM.NS vs RALLIS.BO Comparison April 2026
KHAICHEM.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHAICHEM.NS stands at 5.2B. In comparison, RALLIS.BO has a market cap of 50.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KHAICHEM.NS is priced at ₹56.87, while RALLIS.BO trades at ₹258.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHAICHEM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas RALLIS.BO's P/E ratio is 30.10. In terms of profitability, KHAICHEM.NS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to RALLIS.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KHAICHEM.NS is more volatile compared to RALLIS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHAICHEM.NS.Check RALLIS.BO's competition here
KHAICHEM.NS vs RALLIS.NS Comparison April 2026
KHAICHEM.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHAICHEM.NS stands at 5.2B. In comparison, RALLIS.NS has a market cap of 50.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KHAICHEM.NS is priced at ₹56.87, while RALLIS.NS trades at ₹258.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHAICHEM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas RALLIS.NS's P/E ratio is 29.44. In terms of profitability, KHAICHEM.NS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to RALLIS.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KHAICHEM.NS is more volatile compared to RALLIS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHAICHEM.NS.Check RALLIS.NS's competition here
KHAICHEM.NS vs KSCL.BO Comparison April 2026
KHAICHEM.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHAICHEM.NS stands at 5.2B. In comparison, KSCL.BO has a market cap of 47.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KHAICHEM.NS is priced at ₹56.87, while KSCL.BO trades at ₹932.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHAICHEM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas KSCL.BO's P/E ratio is 15.69. In terms of profitability, KHAICHEM.NS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to KSCL.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KHAICHEM.NS is more volatile compared to KSCL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHAICHEM.NS.Check KSCL.BO's competition here
KHAICHEM.NS vs DHANUKA.BO Comparison April 2026
KHAICHEM.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHAICHEM.NS stands at 5.2B. In comparison, DHANUKA.BO has a market cap of 46.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KHAICHEM.NS is priced at ₹56.87, while DHANUKA.BO trades at ₹1,019.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHAICHEM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas DHANUKA.BO's P/E ratio is 6.56. In terms of profitability, KHAICHEM.NS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to DHANUKA.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KHAICHEM.NS is more volatile compared to DHANUKA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHAICHEM.NS.Check DHANUKA.BO's competition here
KHAICHEM.NS vs DHANUKA.NS Comparison April 2026
KHAICHEM.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHAICHEM.NS stands at 5.2B. In comparison, DHANUKA.NS has a market cap of 46.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KHAICHEM.NS is priced at ₹56.87, while DHANUKA.NS trades at ₹1,017.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHAICHEM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas DHANUKA.NS's P/E ratio is 6.55. In terms of profitability, KHAICHEM.NS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to DHANUKA.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KHAICHEM.NS is more volatile compared to DHANUKA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHAICHEM.NS.Check DHANUKA.NS's competition here
KHAICHEM.NS vs MBAPL.NS Comparison April 2026
KHAICHEM.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHAICHEM.NS stands at 5.2B. In comparison, MBAPL.NS has a market cap of 45.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KHAICHEM.NS is priced at ₹56.87, while MBAPL.NS trades at ₹524.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHAICHEM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas MBAPL.NS's P/E ratio is 43.76. In terms of profitability, KHAICHEM.NS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to MBAPL.NS's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, KHAICHEM.NS is more volatile compared to MBAPL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHAICHEM.NS.Check MBAPL.NS's competition here
KHAICHEM.NS vs NFL.BO Comparison April 2026
KHAICHEM.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHAICHEM.NS stands at 5.2B. In comparison, NFL.BO has a market cap of 37.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KHAICHEM.NS is priced at ₹56.87, while NFL.BO trades at ₹74.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHAICHEM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas NFL.BO's P/E ratio is 19.03. In terms of profitability, KHAICHEM.NS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to NFL.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KHAICHEM.NS is more volatile compared to NFL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHAICHEM.NS.Check NFL.BO's competition here
KHAICHEM.NS vs NFL.NS Comparison April 2026
KHAICHEM.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHAICHEM.NS stands at 5.2B. In comparison, NFL.NS has a market cap of 37B. Regarding current trading prices, KHAICHEM.NS is priced at ₹56.87, while NFL.NS trades at ₹74.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHAICHEM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas NFL.NS's P/E ratio is 19.01. In terms of profitability, KHAICHEM.NS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to NFL.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KHAICHEM.NS is more volatile compared to NFL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHAICHEM.NS.Check NFL.NS's competition here
KHAICHEM.NS vs MANGCHEFER.NS Comparison April 2026
KHAICHEM.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHAICHEM.NS stands at 5.2B. In comparison, MANGCHEFER.NS has a market cap of 36.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KHAICHEM.NS is priced at ₹56.87, while MANGCHEFER.NS trades at ₹308.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHAICHEM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas MANGCHEFER.NS's P/E ratio is 22.67. In terms of profitability, KHAICHEM.NS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to MANGCHEFER.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KHAICHEM.NS is more volatile compared to MANGCHEFER.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHAICHEM.NS.Check MANGCHEFER.NS's competition here
KHAICHEM.NS vs MANGCHEFER.BO Comparison April 2026
KHAICHEM.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHAICHEM.NS stands at 5.2B. In comparison, MANGCHEFER.BO has a market cap of 36.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KHAICHEM.NS is priced at ₹56.87, while MANGCHEFER.BO trades at ₹308.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHAICHEM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas MANGCHEFER.BO's P/E ratio is 22.63. In terms of profitability, KHAICHEM.NS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to MANGCHEFER.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KHAICHEM.NS is more volatile compared to MANGCHEFER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHAICHEM.NS.Check MANGCHEFER.BO's competition here
KHAICHEM.NS vs KRISHANA.NS Comparison April 2026
KHAICHEM.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHAICHEM.NS stands at 5.2B. In comparison, KRISHANA.NS has a market cap of 35.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KHAICHEM.NS is priced at ₹56.87, while KRISHANA.NS trades at ₹582.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHAICHEM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas KRISHANA.NS's P/E ratio is 27.22. In terms of profitability, KHAICHEM.NS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to KRISHANA.NS's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, KHAICHEM.NS is more volatile compared to KRISHANA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHAICHEM.NS.Check KRISHANA.NS's competition here
KHAICHEM.NS vs BNHOLDINGS.BO Comparison April 2026
KHAICHEM.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHAICHEM.NS stands at 5.2B. In comparison, BNHOLDINGS.BO has a market cap of 34.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KHAICHEM.NS is priced at ₹56.87, while BNHOLDINGS.BO trades at ₹355.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHAICHEM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas BNHOLDINGS.BO's P/E ratio is 26.71. In terms of profitability, KHAICHEM.NS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to BNHOLDINGS.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KHAICHEM.NS is more volatile compared to BNHOLDINGS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHAICHEM.NS.Check BNHOLDINGS.BO's competition here
KHAICHEM.NS vs NACLIND.BO Comparison April 2026
KHAICHEM.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHAICHEM.NS stands at 5.2B. In comparison, NACLIND.BO has a market cap of 32.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KHAICHEM.NS is priced at ₹56.87, while NACLIND.BO trades at ₹163.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHAICHEM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas NACLIND.BO's P/E ratio is -81.54. In terms of profitability, KHAICHEM.NS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to NACLIND.BO's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KHAICHEM.NS is more volatile compared to NACLIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHAICHEM.NS.Check NACLIND.BO's competition here
KHAICHEM.NS vs NACLIND.NS Comparison April 2026
KHAICHEM.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHAICHEM.NS stands at 5.2B. In comparison, NACLIND.NS has a market cap of 32.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KHAICHEM.NS is priced at ₹56.87, while NACLIND.NS trades at ₹164.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHAICHEM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas NACLIND.NS's P/E ratio is -81.50. In terms of profitability, KHAICHEM.NS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to NACLIND.NS's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KHAICHEM.NS is more volatile compared to NACLIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHAICHEM.NS.Check NACLIND.NS's competition here
KHAICHEM.NS vs BHAGCHEM.BO Comparison April 2026
KHAICHEM.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHAICHEM.NS stands at 5.2B. In comparison, BHAGCHEM.BO has a market cap of 29B. Regarding current trading prices, KHAICHEM.NS is priced at ₹56.87, while BHAGCHEM.BO trades at ₹216.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHAICHEM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas BHAGCHEM.BO's P/E ratio is 230.88. In terms of profitability, KHAICHEM.NS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to BHAGCHEM.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KHAICHEM.NS is more volatile compared to BHAGCHEM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHAICHEM.NS.Check BHAGCHEM.BO's competition here
KHAICHEM.NS vs BHAGCHEM.NS Comparison April 2026
KHAICHEM.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHAICHEM.NS stands at 5.2B. In comparison, BHAGCHEM.NS has a market cap of 28.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KHAICHEM.NS is priced at ₹56.87, while BHAGCHEM.NS trades at ₹217.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHAICHEM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas BHAGCHEM.NS's P/E ratio is 229.24. In terms of profitability, KHAICHEM.NS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to BHAGCHEM.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KHAICHEM.NS is more volatile compared to BHAGCHEM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHAICHEM.NS.Check BHAGCHEM.NS's competition here
KHAICHEM.NS vs CIANAGRO.BO Comparison April 2026
KHAICHEM.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHAICHEM.NS stands at 5.2B. In comparison, CIANAGRO.BO has a market cap of 24.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KHAICHEM.NS is priced at ₹56.87, while CIANAGRO.BO trades at ₹907.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHAICHEM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas CIANAGRO.BO's P/E ratio is 21.55. In terms of profitability, KHAICHEM.NS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to CIANAGRO.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KHAICHEM.NS is more volatile compared to CIANAGRO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHAICHEM.NS.Check CIANAGRO.BO's competition here
KHAICHEM.NS vs VENKYS.BO Comparison April 2026
KHAICHEM.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHAICHEM.NS stands at 5.2B. In comparison, VENKYS.BO has a market cap of 24.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KHAICHEM.NS is priced at ₹56.87, while VENKYS.BO trades at ₹1,714.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHAICHEM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas VENKYS.BO's P/E ratio is -57.49. In terms of profitability, KHAICHEM.NS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to VENKYS.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KHAICHEM.NS is more volatile compared to VENKYS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHAICHEM.NS.Check VENKYS.BO's competition here
KHAICHEM.NS vs KSE.NS Comparison April 2026
KHAICHEM.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHAICHEM.NS stands at 5.2B. In comparison, KSE.NS has a market cap of 22.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KHAICHEM.NS is priced at ₹56.87, while KSE.NS trades at ₹697.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHAICHEM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas KSE.NS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KHAICHEM.NS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to KSE.NS's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, KHAICHEM.NS is more volatile compared to KSE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHAICHEM.NS.Check KSE.NS's competition here
KHAICHEM.NS vs INSECTICID.NS Comparison April 2026
KHAICHEM.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHAICHEM.NS stands at 5.2B. In comparison, INSECTICID.NS has a market cap of 18.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KHAICHEM.NS is priced at ₹56.87, while INSECTICID.NS trades at ₹674.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHAICHEM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas INSECTICID.NS's P/E ratio is 13.23. In terms of profitability, KHAICHEM.NS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to INSECTICID.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KHAICHEM.NS is more volatile compared to INSECTICID.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHAICHEM.NS.Check INSECTICID.NS's competition here
KHAICHEM.NS vs INSECTICID.BO Comparison April 2026
KHAICHEM.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHAICHEM.NS stands at 5.2B. In comparison, INSECTICID.BO has a market cap of 18.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KHAICHEM.NS is priced at ₹56.87, while INSECTICID.BO trades at ₹675.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHAICHEM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas INSECTICID.BO's P/E ratio is 13.21. In terms of profitability, KHAICHEM.NS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to INSECTICID.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KHAICHEM.NS is more volatile compared to INSECTICID.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHAICHEM.NS.Check INSECTICID.BO's competition here
KHAICHEM.NS vs IPL.BO Comparison April 2026
KHAICHEM.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHAICHEM.NS stands at 5.2B. In comparison, IPL.BO has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KHAICHEM.NS is priced at ₹56.87, while IPL.BO trades at ₹147.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHAICHEM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas IPL.BO's P/E ratio is 15.58. In terms of profitability, KHAICHEM.NS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to IPL.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KHAICHEM.NS is more volatile compared to IPL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHAICHEM.NS.Check IPL.BO's competition here
KHAICHEM.NS vs IPL.NS Comparison April 2026
KHAICHEM.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHAICHEM.NS stands at 5.2B. In comparison, IPL.NS has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, KHAICHEM.NS is priced at ₹56.87, while IPL.NS trades at ₹147.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHAICHEM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas IPL.NS's P/E ratio is 15.56. In terms of profitability, KHAICHEM.NS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to IPL.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KHAICHEM.NS is more volatile compared to IPL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHAICHEM.NS.Check IPL.NS's competition here
KHAICHEM.NS vs ASTEC.BO Comparison April 2026
KHAICHEM.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHAICHEM.NS stands at 5.2B. In comparison, ASTEC.BO has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KHAICHEM.NS is priced at ₹56.87, while ASTEC.BO trades at ₹641.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHAICHEM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas ASTEC.BO's P/E ratio is -15.59. In terms of profitability, KHAICHEM.NS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ASTEC.BO's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, KHAICHEM.NS is more volatile compared to ASTEC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHAICHEM.NS.Check ASTEC.BO's competition here
KHAICHEM.NS vs ASTEC.NS Comparison April 2026
KHAICHEM.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHAICHEM.NS stands at 5.2B. In comparison, ASTEC.NS has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KHAICHEM.NS is priced at ₹56.87, while ASTEC.NS trades at ₹643.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHAICHEM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas ASTEC.NS's P/E ratio is -15.58. In terms of profitability, KHAICHEM.NS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ASTEC.NS's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, KHAICHEM.NS is more volatile compared to ASTEC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHAICHEM.NS.Check ASTEC.NS's competition here
KHAICHEM.NS vs SPIC.BO Comparison April 2026
KHAICHEM.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHAICHEM.NS stands at 5.2B. In comparison, SPIC.BO has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KHAICHEM.NS is priced at ₹56.87, while SPIC.BO trades at ₹66.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHAICHEM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas SPIC.BO's P/E ratio is 7.39. In terms of profitability, KHAICHEM.NS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to SPIC.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KHAICHEM.NS is more volatile compared to SPIC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHAICHEM.NS.Check SPIC.BO's competition here
KHAICHEM.NS vs SPIC.NS Comparison April 2026
KHAICHEM.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHAICHEM.NS stands at 5.2B. In comparison, SPIC.NS has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KHAICHEM.NS is priced at ₹56.87, while SPIC.NS trades at ₹66.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHAICHEM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas SPIC.NS's P/E ratio is 6.80. In terms of profitability, KHAICHEM.NS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to SPIC.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KHAICHEM.NS is more volatile compared to SPIC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHAICHEM.NS.Check SPIC.NS's competition here
KHAICHEM.NS vs BHARATRAS.BO Comparison April 2026
KHAICHEM.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHAICHEM.NS stands at 5.2B. In comparison, BHARATRAS.BO has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KHAICHEM.NS is priced at ₹56.87, while BHARATRAS.BO trades at ₹1,577.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHAICHEM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas BHARATRAS.BO's P/E ratio is 19.61. In terms of profitability, KHAICHEM.NS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to BHARATRAS.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KHAICHEM.NS is more volatile compared to BHARATRAS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHAICHEM.NS.Check BHARATRAS.BO's competition here
KHAICHEM.NS vs BHARATRAS.NS Comparison April 2026
KHAICHEM.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHAICHEM.NS stands at 5.2B. In comparison, BHARATRAS.NS has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, KHAICHEM.NS is priced at ₹56.87, while BHARATRAS.NS trades at ₹1,590.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHAICHEM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas BHARATRAS.NS's P/E ratio is 19.23. In terms of profitability, KHAICHEM.NS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to BHARATRAS.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KHAICHEM.NS is more volatile compared to BHARATRAS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHAICHEM.NS.Check BHARATRAS.NS's competition here
KHAICHEM.NS vs MOL.BO Comparison April 2026
KHAICHEM.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHAICHEM.NS stands at 5.2B. In comparison, MOL.BO has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KHAICHEM.NS is priced at ₹56.87, while MOL.BO trades at ₹48.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHAICHEM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas MOL.BO's P/E ratio is 31.25. In terms of profitability, KHAICHEM.NS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to MOL.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KHAICHEM.NS is more volatile compared to MOL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHAICHEM.NS.Check MOL.BO's competition here
KHAICHEM.NS vs MOL.NS Comparison April 2026
KHAICHEM.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHAICHEM.NS stands at 5.2B. In comparison, MOL.NS has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KHAICHEM.NS is priced at ₹56.87, while MOL.NS trades at ₹48.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHAICHEM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas MOL.NS's P/E ratio is 31.22. In terms of profitability, KHAICHEM.NS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to MOL.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KHAICHEM.NS is more volatile compared to MOL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHAICHEM.NS.Check MOL.NS's competition here
KHAICHEM.NS vs MADRASFERT.NS Comparison April 2026
KHAICHEM.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHAICHEM.NS stands at 5.2B. In comparison, MADRASFERT.NS has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KHAICHEM.NS is priced at ₹56.87, while MADRASFERT.NS trades at ₹66.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHAICHEM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas MADRASFERT.NS's P/E ratio is 148.36. In terms of profitability, KHAICHEM.NS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to MADRASFERT.NS's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, KHAICHEM.NS is more volatile compared to MADRASFERT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHAICHEM.NS.Check MADRASFERT.NS's competition here
KHAICHEM.NS vs MADRASFERT.BO Comparison April 2026
KHAICHEM.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHAICHEM.NS stands at 5.2B. In comparison, MADRASFERT.BO has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KHAICHEM.NS is priced at ₹56.87, while MADRASFERT.BO trades at ₹65.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHAICHEM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas MADRASFERT.BO's P/E ratio is 148.27. In terms of profitability, KHAICHEM.NS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to MADRASFERT.BO's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, KHAICHEM.NS is more volatile compared to MADRASFERT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHAICHEM.NS.Check MADRASFERT.BO's competition here
KHAICHEM.NS vs BSHSL.NS Comparison April 2026
KHAICHEM.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHAICHEM.NS stands at 5.2B. In comparison, BSHSL.NS has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KHAICHEM.NS is priced at ₹56.87, while BSHSL.NS trades at ₹101.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHAICHEM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas BSHSL.NS's P/E ratio is 36.75. In terms of profitability, KHAICHEM.NS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to BSHSL.NS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, KHAICHEM.NS is more volatile compared to BSHSL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHAICHEM.NS.Check BSHSL.NS's competition here
KHAICHEM.NS vs BAJAJST.BO Comparison April 2026
KHAICHEM.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHAICHEM.NS stands at 5.2B. In comparison, BAJAJST.BO has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KHAICHEM.NS is priced at ₹56.87, while BAJAJST.BO trades at ₹465.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHAICHEM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas BAJAJST.BO's P/E ratio is 18.93. In terms of profitability, KHAICHEM.NS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to BAJAJST.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KHAICHEM.NS is more volatile compared to BAJAJST.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHAICHEM.NS.Check BAJAJST.BO's competition here
KHAICHEM.NS vs ZUARI.NS Comparison April 2026
KHAICHEM.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHAICHEM.NS stands at 5.2B. In comparison, ZUARI.NS has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KHAICHEM.NS is priced at ₹56.87, while ZUARI.NS trades at ₹219.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHAICHEM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas ZUARI.NS's P/E ratio is 0.96. In terms of profitability, KHAICHEM.NS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ZUARI.NS's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, KHAICHEM.NS is more volatile compared to ZUARI.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHAICHEM.NS.Check ZUARI.NS's competition here
KHAICHEM.NS vs BLUECLOUDS.BO Comparison April 2026
KHAICHEM.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHAICHEM.NS stands at 5.2B. In comparison, BLUECLOUDS.BO has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KHAICHEM.NS is priced at ₹56.87, while BLUECLOUDS.BO trades at ₹19.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHAICHEM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas BLUECLOUDS.BO's P/E ratio is 14.87. In terms of profitability, KHAICHEM.NS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to BLUECLOUDS.BO's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, KHAICHEM.NS is more volatile compared to BLUECLOUDS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHAICHEM.NS.Check BLUECLOUDS.BO's competition here
KHAICHEM.NS vs DHARMAJ.NS Comparison April 2026
KHAICHEM.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHAICHEM.NS stands at 5.2B. In comparison, DHARMAJ.NS has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KHAICHEM.NS is priced at ₹56.87, while DHARMAJ.NS trades at ₹275.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHAICHEM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas DHARMAJ.NS's P/E ratio is 18.93. In terms of profitability, KHAICHEM.NS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to DHARMAJ.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KHAICHEM.NS is more volatile compared to DHARMAJ.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHAICHEM.NS.Check DHARMAJ.NS's competition here
KHAICHEM.NS vs DHARMAJ.BO Comparison April 2026
KHAICHEM.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHAICHEM.NS stands at 5.2B. In comparison, DHARMAJ.BO has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KHAICHEM.NS is priced at ₹56.87, while DHARMAJ.BO trades at ₹277.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHAICHEM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas DHARMAJ.BO's P/E ratio is 18.95. In terms of profitability, KHAICHEM.NS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to DHARMAJ.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KHAICHEM.NS is more volatile compared to DHARMAJ.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHAICHEM.NS.Check DHARMAJ.BO's competition here
KHAICHEM.NS vs HERANBA.BO Comparison April 2026
KHAICHEM.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHAICHEM.NS stands at 5.2B. In comparison, HERANBA.BO has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KHAICHEM.NS is priced at ₹56.87, while HERANBA.BO trades at ₹199.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHAICHEM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas HERANBA.BO's P/E ratio is -12.94. In terms of profitability, KHAICHEM.NS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to HERANBA.BO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KHAICHEM.NS is more volatile compared to HERANBA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHAICHEM.NS.Check HERANBA.BO's competition here
KHAICHEM.NS vs HERANBA.NS Comparison April 2026
KHAICHEM.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHAICHEM.NS stands at 5.2B. In comparison, HERANBA.NS has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KHAICHEM.NS is priced at ₹56.87, while HERANBA.NS trades at ₹200.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHAICHEM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas HERANBA.NS's P/E ratio is -12.72. In terms of profitability, KHAICHEM.NS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to HERANBA.NS's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KHAICHEM.NS is more volatile compared to HERANBA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHAICHEM.NS.Check HERANBA.NS's competition here
KHAICHEM.NS vs KSE.BO Comparison April 2026
KHAICHEM.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHAICHEM.NS stands at 5.2B. In comparison, KSE.BO has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KHAICHEM.NS is priced at ₹56.87, while KSE.BO trades at ₹197.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHAICHEM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas KSE.BO's P/E ratio is 5.37. In terms of profitability, KHAICHEM.NS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to KSE.BO's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, KHAICHEM.NS is more volatile compared to KSE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHAICHEM.NS.Check KSE.BO's competition here
KHAICHEM.NS vs BESTAGRO.BO Comparison April 2026
KHAICHEM.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHAICHEM.NS stands at 5.2B. In comparison, BESTAGRO.BO has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KHAICHEM.NS is priced at ₹56.87, while BESTAGRO.BO trades at ₹17.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHAICHEM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas BESTAGRO.BO's P/E ratio is 9.20. In terms of profitability, KHAICHEM.NS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to BESTAGRO.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KHAICHEM.NS is more volatile compared to BESTAGRO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHAICHEM.NS.Check BESTAGRO.BO's competition here
KHAICHEM.NS vs BESTAGRO.NS Comparison April 2026
KHAICHEM.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHAICHEM.NS stands at 5.2B. In comparison, BESTAGRO.NS has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KHAICHEM.NS is priced at ₹56.87, while BESTAGRO.NS trades at ₹17.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHAICHEM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas BESTAGRO.NS's P/E ratio is 8.72. In terms of profitability, KHAICHEM.NS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to BESTAGRO.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KHAICHEM.NS is more volatile compared to BESTAGRO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHAICHEM.NS.Check BESTAGRO.NS's competition here
KHAICHEM.NS vs SHINDL.BO Comparison April 2026
KHAICHEM.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHAICHEM.NS stands at 5.2B. In comparison, SHINDL.BO has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KHAICHEM.NS is priced at ₹56.87, while SHINDL.BO trades at ₹147.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHAICHEM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas SHINDL.BO's P/E ratio is 46.99. In terms of profitability, KHAICHEM.NS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to SHINDL.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KHAICHEM.NS is more volatile compared to SHINDL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHAICHEM.NS.Check SHINDL.BO's competition here
KHAICHEM.NS vs SVRL.BO Comparison April 2026
KHAICHEM.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHAICHEM.NS stands at 5.2B. In comparison, SVRL.BO has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KHAICHEM.NS is priced at ₹56.87, while SVRL.BO trades at ₹261.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHAICHEM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas SVRL.BO's P/E ratio is 22.77. In terms of profitability, KHAICHEM.NS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to SVRL.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KHAICHEM.NS is more volatile compared to SVRL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHAICHEM.NS.Check SVRL.BO's competition here
KHAICHEM.NS vs KNAGRI.NS Comparison April 2026
KHAICHEM.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHAICHEM.NS stands at 5.2B. In comparison, KNAGRI.NS has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KHAICHEM.NS is priced at ₹56.87, while KNAGRI.NS trades at ₹221.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHAICHEM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas KNAGRI.NS's P/E ratio is 15.32. In terms of profitability, KHAICHEM.NS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to KNAGRI.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KHAICHEM.NS is more volatile compared to KNAGRI.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHAICHEM.NS.Check KNAGRI.NS's competition here
KHAICHEM.NS vs KHAICHEM.BO Comparison April 2026
KHAICHEM.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHAICHEM.NS stands at 5.2B. In comparison, KHAICHEM.BO has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KHAICHEM.NS is priced at ₹56.87, while KHAICHEM.BO trades at ₹56.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHAICHEM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas KHAICHEM.BO's P/E ratio is 7.68. In terms of profitability, KHAICHEM.NS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to KHAICHEM.BO's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, KHAICHEM.NS is less volatile compared to KHAICHEM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHAICHEM.NS.Check KHAICHEM.BO's competition here
KHAICHEM.NS vs MODINATUR.BO Comparison April 2026
KHAICHEM.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHAICHEM.NS stands at 5.2B. In comparison, MODINATUR.BO has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, KHAICHEM.NS is priced at ₹56.87, while MODINATUR.BO trades at ₹378.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHAICHEM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas MODINATUR.BO's P/E ratio is 12.98. In terms of profitability, KHAICHEM.NS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to MODINATUR.BO's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, KHAICHEM.NS is more volatile compared to MODINATUR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHAICHEM.NS.Check MODINATUR.BO's competition here
KHAICHEM.NS vs ARIES.NS Comparison April 2026
KHAICHEM.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHAICHEM.NS stands at 5.2B. In comparison, ARIES.NS has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KHAICHEM.NS is priced at ₹56.87, while ARIES.NS trades at ₹379.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHAICHEM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas ARIES.NS's P/E ratio is 11.35. In terms of profitability, KHAICHEM.NS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ARIES.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KHAICHEM.NS is more volatile compared to ARIES.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHAICHEM.NS.Check ARIES.NS's competition here
KHAICHEM.NS vs MISHTANN.BO Comparison April 2026
KHAICHEM.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHAICHEM.NS stands at 5.2B. In comparison, MISHTANN.BO has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KHAICHEM.NS is priced at ₹56.87, while MISHTANN.BO trades at ₹4.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHAICHEM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas MISHTANN.BO's P/E ratio is 1.45. In terms of profitability, KHAICHEM.NS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to MISHTANN.BO's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, KHAICHEM.NS is more volatile compared to MISHTANN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHAICHEM.NS.Check MISHTANN.BO's competition here
KHAICHEM.NS vs RAMAPHO.BO Comparison April 2026
KHAICHEM.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHAICHEM.NS stands at 5.2B. In comparison, RAMAPHO.BO has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KHAICHEM.NS is priced at ₹56.87, while RAMAPHO.BO trades at ₹130.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHAICHEM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas RAMAPHO.BO's P/E ratio is 9.15. In terms of profitability, KHAICHEM.NS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to RAMAPHO.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KHAICHEM.NS is more volatile compared to RAMAPHO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHAICHEM.NS.Check RAMAPHO.BO's competition here
KHAICHEM.NS vs RAMAPHO.NS Comparison April 2026
KHAICHEM.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHAICHEM.NS stands at 5.2B. In comparison, RAMAPHO.NS has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KHAICHEM.NS is priced at ₹56.87, while RAMAPHO.NS trades at ₹132.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHAICHEM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas RAMAPHO.NS's P/E ratio is 8.96. In terms of profitability, KHAICHEM.NS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to RAMAPHO.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KHAICHEM.NS is more volatile compared to RAMAPHO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHAICHEM.NS.Check RAMAPHO.NS's competition here
KHAICHEM.NS vs SHIVALIK.NS Comparison April 2026
KHAICHEM.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHAICHEM.NS stands at 5.2B. In comparison, SHIVALIK.NS has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KHAICHEM.NS is priced at ₹56.87, while SHIVALIK.NS trades at ₹276.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHAICHEM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas SHIVALIK.NS's P/E ratio is 32.63. In terms of profitability, KHAICHEM.NS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to SHIVALIK.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KHAICHEM.NS is more volatile compared to SHIVALIK.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHAICHEM.NS.Check SHIVALIK.NS's competition here
KHAICHEM.NS vs IGCL.NS Comparison April 2026
KHAICHEM.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHAICHEM.NS stands at 5.2B. In comparison, IGCL.NS has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KHAICHEM.NS is priced at ₹56.87, while IGCL.NS trades at ₹61.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHAICHEM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas IGCL.NS's P/E ratio is 11.09. In terms of profitability, KHAICHEM.NS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to IGCL.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KHAICHEM.NS is more volatile compared to IGCL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHAICHEM.NS.Check IGCL.NS's competition here
KHAICHEM.NS vs GOODRICKE.BO Comparison April 2026
KHAICHEM.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHAICHEM.NS stands at 5.2B. In comparison, GOODRICKE.BO has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KHAICHEM.NS is priced at ₹56.87, while GOODRICKE.BO trades at ₹165.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHAICHEM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas GOODRICKE.BO's P/E ratio is 19.59. In terms of profitability, KHAICHEM.NS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to GOODRICKE.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KHAICHEM.NS is more volatile compared to GOODRICKE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHAICHEM.NS.Check GOODRICKE.BO's competition here
KHAICHEM.NS vs KINGSINFR.BO Comparison April 2026
KHAICHEM.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHAICHEM.NS stands at 5.2B. In comparison, KINGSINFR.BO has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KHAICHEM.NS is priced at ₹56.87, while KINGSINFR.BO trades at ₹127.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHAICHEM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas KINGSINFR.BO's P/E ratio is 23.66. In terms of profitability, KHAICHEM.NS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to KINGSINFR.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KHAICHEM.NS is more volatile compared to KINGSINFR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHAICHEM.NS.Check KINGSINFR.BO's competition here
KHAICHEM.NS vs NATHBIOGEN.NS Comparison April 2026
KHAICHEM.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHAICHEM.NS stands at 5.2B. In comparison, NATHBIOGEN.NS has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KHAICHEM.NS is priced at ₹56.87, while NATHBIOGEN.NS trades at ₹176.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHAICHEM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas NATHBIOGEN.NS's P/E ratio is 6.74. In terms of profitability, KHAICHEM.NS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to NATHBIOGEN.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KHAICHEM.NS is less volatile compared to NATHBIOGEN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHAICHEM.NS.Check NATHBIOGEN.NS's competition here
KHAICHEM.NS vs NATHBIOGEN.BO Comparison April 2026
KHAICHEM.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHAICHEM.NS stands at 5.2B. In comparison, NATHBIOGEN.BO has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KHAICHEM.NS is priced at ₹56.87, while NATHBIOGEN.BO trades at ₹175.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHAICHEM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas NATHBIOGEN.BO's P/E ratio is 6.73. In terms of profitability, KHAICHEM.NS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to NATHBIOGEN.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KHAICHEM.NS is less volatile compared to NATHBIOGEN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHAICHEM.NS.Check NATHBIOGEN.BO's competition here
KHAICHEM.NS vs NOVAAGRI.NS Comparison April 2026
KHAICHEM.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHAICHEM.NS stands at 5.2B. In comparison, NOVAAGRI.NS has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KHAICHEM.NS is priced at ₹56.87, while NOVAAGRI.NS trades at ₹28.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHAICHEM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas NOVAAGRI.NS's P/E ratio is 15.87. In terms of profitability, KHAICHEM.NS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to NOVAAGRI.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KHAICHEM.NS is more volatile compared to NOVAAGRI.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHAICHEM.NS.Check NOVAAGRI.NS's competition here
KHAICHEM.NS vs NAGAFERT.BO Comparison April 2026
KHAICHEM.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHAICHEM.NS stands at 5.2B. In comparison, NAGAFERT.BO has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KHAICHEM.NS is priced at ₹56.87, while NAGAFERT.BO trades at ₹4.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHAICHEM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas NAGAFERT.BO's P/E ratio is -8.91. In terms of profitability, KHAICHEM.NS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to NAGAFERT.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KHAICHEM.NS is more volatile compared to NAGAFERT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHAICHEM.NS.Check NAGAFERT.BO's competition here
KHAICHEM.NS vs NAGAFERT.NS Comparison April 2026
KHAICHEM.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHAICHEM.NS stands at 5.2B. In comparison, NAGAFERT.NS has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KHAICHEM.NS is priced at ₹56.87, while NAGAFERT.NS trades at ₹4.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHAICHEM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas NAGAFERT.NS's P/E ratio is -8.83. In terms of profitability, KHAICHEM.NS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to NAGAFERT.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KHAICHEM.NS is more volatile compared to NAGAFERT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHAICHEM.NS.Check NAGAFERT.NS's competition here
KHAICHEM.NS vs INDOUS.BO Comparison April 2026
KHAICHEM.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHAICHEM.NS stands at 5.2B. In comparison, INDOUS.BO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KHAICHEM.NS is priced at ₹56.87, while INDOUS.BO trades at ₹106.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHAICHEM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas INDOUS.BO's P/E ratio is 14.48. In terms of profitability, KHAICHEM.NS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to INDOUS.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KHAICHEM.NS is more volatile compared to INDOUS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHAICHEM.NS.Check INDOUS.BO's competition here
KHAICHEM.NS vs INDOUS.NS Comparison April 2026
KHAICHEM.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHAICHEM.NS stands at 5.2B. In comparison, INDOUS.NS has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KHAICHEM.NS is priced at ₹56.87, while INDOUS.NS trades at ₹105.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHAICHEM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas INDOUS.NS's P/E ratio is 14.40. In terms of profitability, KHAICHEM.NS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to INDOUS.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KHAICHEM.NS is more volatile compared to INDOUS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHAICHEM.NS.Check INDOUS.NS's competition here
KHAICHEM.NS vs RBS.NS Comparison April 2026
KHAICHEM.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHAICHEM.NS stands at 5.2B. In comparison, RBS.NS has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, KHAICHEM.NS is priced at ₹56.87, while RBS.NS trades at ₹87.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHAICHEM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas RBS.NS's P/E ratio is 12.89. In terms of profitability, KHAICHEM.NS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to RBS.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KHAICHEM.NS is more volatile compared to RBS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHAICHEM.NS.Check RBS.NS's competition here
KHAICHEM.NS vs VIJSOLX.BO Comparison April 2026
KHAICHEM.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHAICHEM.NS stands at 5.2B. In comparison, VIJSOLX.BO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KHAICHEM.NS is priced at ₹56.87, while VIJSOLX.BO trades at ₹614.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHAICHEM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas VIJSOLX.BO's P/E ratio is 12.51. In terms of profitability, KHAICHEM.NS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to VIJSOLX.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KHAICHEM.NS is more volatile compared to VIJSOLX.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHAICHEM.NS.Check VIJSOLX.BO's competition here
KHAICHEM.NS vs HOACFOODS.NS Comparison April 2026
KHAICHEM.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHAICHEM.NS stands at 5.2B. In comparison, HOACFOODS.NS has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KHAICHEM.NS is priced at ₹56.87, while HOACFOODS.NS trades at ₹398.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHAICHEM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas HOACFOODS.NS's P/E ratio is 61.51. In terms of profitability, KHAICHEM.NS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to HOACFOODS.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KHAICHEM.NS is more volatile compared to HOACFOODS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHAICHEM.NS.Check HOACFOODS.NS's competition here
KHAICHEM.NS vs EQUIPPP.BO Comparison April 2026
KHAICHEM.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHAICHEM.NS stands at 5.2B. In comparison, EQUIPPP.BO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KHAICHEM.NS is priced at ₹56.87, while EQUIPPP.BO trades at ₹14.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHAICHEM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas EQUIPPP.BO's P/E ratio is 213.57. In terms of profitability, KHAICHEM.NS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to EQUIPPP.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, KHAICHEM.NS is more volatile compared to EQUIPPP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHAICHEM.NS.Check EQUIPPP.BO's competition here
KHAICHEM.NS vs EQUIPPP.NS Comparison April 2026
KHAICHEM.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHAICHEM.NS stands at 5.2B. In comparison, EQUIPPP.NS has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KHAICHEM.NS is priced at ₹56.87, while EQUIPPP.NS trades at ₹14.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHAICHEM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas EQUIPPP.NS's P/E ratio is 213.14. In terms of profitability, KHAICHEM.NS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to EQUIPPP.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, KHAICHEM.NS is more volatile compared to EQUIPPP.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHAICHEM.NS.Check EQUIPPP.NS's competition here
KHAICHEM.NS vs MSL.BO Comparison April 2026
KHAICHEM.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHAICHEM.NS stands at 5.2B. In comparison, MSL.BO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KHAICHEM.NS is priced at ₹56.87, while MSL.BO trades at ₹123.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHAICHEM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas MSL.BO's P/E ratio is 13.58. In terms of profitability, KHAICHEM.NS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to MSL.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KHAICHEM.NS is more volatile compared to MSL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHAICHEM.NS.Check MSL.BO's competition here
KHAICHEM.NS vs SBECSUG.BO Comparison April 2026
KHAICHEM.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHAICHEM.NS stands at 5.2B. In comparison, SBECSUG.BO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KHAICHEM.NS is priced at ₹56.87, while SBECSUG.BO trades at ₹30.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHAICHEM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas SBECSUG.BO's P/E ratio is -5.51. In terms of profitability, KHAICHEM.NS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to SBECSUG.BO's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, KHAICHEM.NS is more volatile compared to SBECSUG.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHAICHEM.NS.Check SBECSUG.BO's competition here
KHAICHEM.NS vs SSLEL.BO Comparison April 2026
KHAICHEM.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHAICHEM.NS stands at 5.2B. In comparison, SSLEL.BO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KHAICHEM.NS is priced at ₹56.87, while SSLEL.BO trades at ₹266.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHAICHEM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas SSLEL.BO's P/E ratio is -5.92. In terms of profitability, KHAICHEM.NS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to SSLEL.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KHAICHEM.NS is more volatile compared to SSLEL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHAICHEM.NS.Check SSLEL.BO's competition here
KHAICHEM.NS vs NARMADA.BO Comparison April 2026
KHAICHEM.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHAICHEM.NS stands at 5.2B. In comparison, NARMADA.BO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KHAICHEM.NS is priced at ₹56.87, while NARMADA.BO trades at ₹35.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHAICHEM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas NARMADA.BO's P/E ratio is 31.64. In terms of profitability, KHAICHEM.NS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to NARMADA.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KHAICHEM.NS is more volatile compared to NARMADA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHAICHEM.NS.Check NARMADA.BO's competition here
KHAICHEM.NS vs NARMADA.NS Comparison April 2026
KHAICHEM.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHAICHEM.NS stands at 5.2B. In comparison, NARMADA.NS has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KHAICHEM.NS is priced at ₹56.87, while NARMADA.NS trades at ₹35.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHAICHEM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas NARMADA.NS's P/E ratio is 31.28. In terms of profitability, KHAICHEM.NS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to NARMADA.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KHAICHEM.NS is more volatile compared to NARMADA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHAICHEM.NS.Check NARMADA.NS's competition here
KHAICHEM.NS vs BHARATAGRI.BO Comparison April 2026
KHAICHEM.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHAICHEM.NS stands at 5.2B. In comparison, BHARATAGRI.BO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KHAICHEM.NS is priced at ₹56.87, while BHARATAGRI.BO trades at ₹25.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHAICHEM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas BHARATAGRI.BO's P/E ratio is -64.95. In terms of profitability, KHAICHEM.NS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to BHARATAGRI.BO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KHAICHEM.NS is more volatile compared to BHARATAGRI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHAICHEM.NS.Check BHARATAGRI.BO's competition here
KHAICHEM.NS vs INDSUCR.BO Comparison April 2026
KHAICHEM.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHAICHEM.NS stands at 5.2B. In comparison, INDSUCR.BO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KHAICHEM.NS is priced at ₹56.87, while INDSUCR.BO trades at ₹73.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHAICHEM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.26, whereas INDSUCR.BO's P/E ratio is 3.16. In terms of profitability, KHAICHEM.NS's ROE is +0.31%, compared to INDSUCR.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KHAICHEM.NS is more volatile compared to INDSUCR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHAICHEM.NS.Check INDSUCR.BO's competition here