The Fertilisers And Chemicals Travancore Limited
The Fertilisers And Chemicals Travancore Limited (FACT.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FACT.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Agricultural Inputs Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FACT.NS | ₹916.80 | +1.45% | 592.1B | 2033.33 | ₹0.45 | +0.04% |
| COROMANDEL.BO | ₹1,963.10 | -2.34% | 594.9B | 24.86 | ₹81.21 | +0.89% |
| COROMANDEL.NS | ₹1,967.40 | -2.19% | 594.8B | 24.84 | ₹81.26 | +0.89% |
| FACT.BO | ₹915.70 | +1.34% | 591.9B | 2032.89 | ₹0.45 | +0.04% |
| UPL.NS | ₹650.40 | +1.30% | 557.2B | 31.55 | ₹20.92 | +0.91% |
| PIIND.BO | ₹3,102.70 | +3.06% | 466.1B | 32.12 | ₹95.64 | +0.49% |
| PIIND.NS | ₹3,095.70 | +2.70% | 465.9B | 32.09 | ₹95.69 | +0.49% |
| SUMICHEM.NS | ₹499.50 | +4.73% | 247.3B | 46.51 | ₹10.65 | +0.24% |
| SUMICHEM.BO | ₹499.55 | +4.67% | 247.1B | 46.52 | ₹10.64 | +0.24% |
| BAYERCROP.NS | ₹4,632.30 | -0.22% | 209B | 31.19 | ₹149.12 | +2.69% |
Stock Comparison
FACT.NS vs COROMANDEL.BO Comparison May 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 592.1B. In comparison, COROMANDEL.BO has a market cap of 594.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹916.80, while COROMANDEL.BO trades at ₹1,963.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 2033.33, whereas COROMANDEL.BO's P/E ratio is 24.86. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to COROMANDEL.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is less volatile compared to COROMANDEL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check COROMANDEL.BO's competition here
FACT.NS vs COROMANDEL.NS Comparison May 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 592.1B. In comparison, COROMANDEL.NS has a market cap of 594.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹916.80, while COROMANDEL.NS trades at ₹1,967.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 2033.33, whereas COROMANDEL.NS's P/E ratio is 24.84. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to COROMANDEL.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is less volatile compared to COROMANDEL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check COROMANDEL.NS's competition here
FACT.NS vs FACT.BO Comparison May 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 592.1B. In comparison, FACT.BO has a market cap of 591.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹916.80, while FACT.BO trades at ₹915.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 2033.33, whereas FACT.BO's P/E ratio is 2032.89. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FACT.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is more volatile compared to FACT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check FACT.BO's competition here
FACT.NS vs UPL.NS Comparison May 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 592.1B. In comparison, UPL.NS has a market cap of 557.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹916.80, while UPL.NS trades at ₹650.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 2033.33, whereas UPL.NS's P/E ratio is 31.55. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to UPL.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is less volatile compared to UPL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check UPL.NS's competition here
FACT.NS vs PIIND.BO Comparison May 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 592.1B. In comparison, PIIND.BO has a market cap of 466.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹916.80, while PIIND.BO trades at ₹3,102.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 2033.33, whereas PIIND.BO's P/E ratio is 32.12. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PIIND.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is more volatile compared to PIIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check PIIND.BO's competition here
FACT.NS vs PIIND.NS Comparison May 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 592.1B. In comparison, PIIND.NS has a market cap of 465.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹916.80, while PIIND.NS trades at ₹3,095.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 2033.33, whereas PIIND.NS's P/E ratio is 32.09. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PIIND.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is more volatile compared to PIIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check PIIND.NS's competition here
FACT.NS vs SUMICHEM.NS Comparison May 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 592.1B. In comparison, SUMICHEM.NS has a market cap of 247.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹916.80, while SUMICHEM.NS trades at ₹499.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 2033.33, whereas SUMICHEM.NS's P/E ratio is 46.51. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SUMICHEM.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is less volatile compared to SUMICHEM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check SUMICHEM.NS's competition here
FACT.NS vs SUMICHEM.BO Comparison May 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 592.1B. In comparison, SUMICHEM.BO has a market cap of 247.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹916.80, while SUMICHEM.BO trades at ₹499.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 2033.33, whereas SUMICHEM.BO's P/E ratio is 46.52. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SUMICHEM.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is less volatile compared to SUMICHEM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check SUMICHEM.BO's competition here
FACT.NS vs BAYERCROP.NS Comparison May 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 592.1B. In comparison, BAYERCROP.NS has a market cap of 209B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹916.80, while BAYERCROP.NS trades at ₹4,632.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 2033.33, whereas BAYERCROP.NS's P/E ratio is 31.19. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BAYERCROP.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is more volatile compared to BAYERCROP.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check BAYERCROP.NS's competition here
FACT.NS vs CHAMBLFERT.BO Comparison May 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 592.1B. In comparison, CHAMBLFERT.BO has a market cap of 181.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹916.80, while CHAMBLFERT.BO trades at ₹454.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 2033.33, whereas CHAMBLFERT.BO's P/E ratio is 9.74. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CHAMBLFERT.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is more volatile compared to CHAMBLFERT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check CHAMBLFERT.BO's competition here
FACT.NS vs CHAMBLFERT.NS Comparison May 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 592.1B. In comparison, CHAMBLFERT.NS has a market cap of 181.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹916.80, while CHAMBLFERT.NS trades at ₹454.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 2033.33, whereas CHAMBLFERT.NS's P/E ratio is 9.47. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CHAMBLFERT.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is more volatile compared to CHAMBLFERT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check CHAMBLFERT.NS's competition here
FACT.NS vs ATUL7.BO Comparison May 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 592.1B. In comparison, ATUL7.BO has a market cap of 179B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹916.80, while ATUL7.BO trades at ₹7,100.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 2033.33, whereas ATUL7.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ATUL7.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is more volatile compared to ATUL7.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check ATUL7.BO's competition here
FACT.NS vs EIDPARRY.BO Comparison May 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 592.1B. In comparison, EIDPARRY.BO has a market cap of 152.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹916.80, while EIDPARRY.BO trades at ₹848.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 2033.33, whereas EIDPARRY.BO's P/E ratio is 13.24. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to EIDPARRY.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is less volatile compared to EIDPARRY.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check EIDPARRY.BO's competition here
FACT.NS vs PARADEEP.BO Comparison May 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 592.1B. In comparison, PARADEEP.BO has a market cap of 103.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹916.80, while PARADEEP.BO trades at ₹126.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 2033.33, whereas PARADEEP.BO's P/E ratio is 12.47. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PARADEEP.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is less volatile compared to PARADEEP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check PARADEEP.BO's competition here
FACT.NS vs PARADEEP.NS Comparison May 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 592.1B. In comparison, PARADEEP.NS has a market cap of 103.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹916.80, while PARADEEP.NS trades at ₹127.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 2033.33, whereas PARADEEP.NS's P/E ratio is 12.73. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PARADEEP.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is less volatile compared to PARADEEP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check PARADEEP.NS's competition here
FACT.NS vs SHARDACROP.BO Comparison May 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 592.1B. In comparison, SHARDACROP.BO has a market cap of 101.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹916.80, while SHARDACROP.BO trades at ₹1,140.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 2033.33, whereas SHARDACROP.BO's P/E ratio is 17.88. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SHARDACROP.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is less volatile compared to SHARDACROP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check SHARDACROP.BO's competition here
FACT.NS vs SHARDACROP.NS Comparison May 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 592.1B. In comparison, SHARDACROP.NS has a market cap of 101B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹916.80, while SHARDACROP.NS trades at ₹1,133.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 2033.33, whereas SHARDACROP.NS's P/E ratio is 17.84. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SHARDACROP.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is less volatile compared to SHARDACROP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check SHARDACROP.NS's competition here
FACT.NS vs RCF.NS Comparison May 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 592.1B. In comparison, RCF.NS has a market cap of 72.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹916.80, while RCF.NS trades at ₹131.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 2033.33, whereas RCF.NS's P/E ratio is 23.25. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RCF.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is more volatile compared to RCF.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check RCF.NS's competition here
FACT.NS vs RCF.BO Comparison May 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 592.1B. In comparison, RCF.BO has a market cap of 72.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹916.80, while RCF.BO trades at ₹131.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 2033.33, whereas RCF.BO's P/E ratio is 23.28. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RCF.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is less volatile compared to RCF.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check RCF.BO's competition here
FACT.NS vs GSFC.NS Comparison May 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 592.1B. In comparison, GSFC.NS has a market cap of 70.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹916.80, while GSFC.NS trades at ₹177.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 2033.33, whereas GSFC.NS's P/E ratio is 10.24. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GSFC.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is more volatile compared to GSFC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check GSFC.NS's competition here
FACT.NS vs GSFC.BO Comparison May 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 592.1B. In comparison, GSFC.BO has a market cap of 70.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹916.80, while GSFC.BO trades at ₹177.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 2033.33, whereas GSFC.BO's P/E ratio is 10.61. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GSFC.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is less volatile compared to GSFC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check GSFC.BO's competition here
FACT.NS vs PICCADIL.BO Comparison May 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 592.1B. In comparison, PICCADIL.BO has a market cap of 60.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹916.80, while PICCADIL.BO trades at ₹635.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 2033.33, whereas PICCADIL.BO's P/E ratio is 43.20. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PICCADIL.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is less volatile compared to PICCADIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check PICCADIL.BO's competition here
FACT.NS vs CIANAGRO.BO Comparison May 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 592.1B. In comparison, CIANAGRO.BO has a market cap of 52.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹916.80, while CIANAGRO.BO trades at ₹1,980.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 2033.33, whereas CIANAGRO.BO's P/E ratio is 46.92. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CIANAGRO.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is more volatile compared to CIANAGRO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check CIANAGRO.BO's competition here
FACT.NS vs RALLIS.BO Comparison May 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 592.1B. In comparison, RALLIS.BO has a market cap of 51.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹916.80, while RALLIS.BO trades at ₹264.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 2033.33, whereas RALLIS.BO's P/E ratio is 30.77. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RALLIS.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is more volatile compared to RALLIS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check RALLIS.BO's competition here
FACT.NS vs RALLIS.NS Comparison May 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 592.1B. In comparison, RALLIS.NS has a market cap of 51.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹916.80, while RALLIS.NS trades at ₹264.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 2033.33, whereas RALLIS.NS's P/E ratio is 27.90. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RALLIS.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is more volatile compared to RALLIS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check RALLIS.NS's competition here
FACT.NS vs KSCL.BO Comparison May 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 592.1B. In comparison, KSCL.BO has a market cap of 51.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹916.80, while KSCL.BO trades at ₹1,006.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 2033.33, whereas KSCL.BO's P/E ratio is 16.88. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to KSCL.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is less volatile compared to KSCL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check KSCL.BO's competition here
FACT.NS vs MBAPL.NS Comparison May 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 592.1B. In comparison, MBAPL.NS has a market cap of 50.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹916.80, while MBAPL.NS trades at ₹575.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 2033.33, whereas MBAPL.NS's P/E ratio is 47.81. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MBAPL.NS's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is less volatile compared to MBAPL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check MBAPL.NS's competition here
FACT.NS vs DHANUKA.NS Comparison May 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 592.1B. In comparison, DHANUKA.NS has a market cap of 49.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹916.80, while DHANUKA.NS trades at ₹1,092.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 2033.33, whereas DHANUKA.NS's P/E ratio is 6.97. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DHANUKA.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is more volatile compared to DHANUKA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check DHANUKA.NS's competition here
FACT.NS vs DHANUKA.BO Comparison May 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 592.1B. In comparison, DHANUKA.BO has a market cap of 49.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹916.80, while DHANUKA.BO trades at ₹1,093.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 2033.33, whereas DHANUKA.BO's P/E ratio is 6.96. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DHANUKA.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is more volatile compared to DHANUKA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check DHANUKA.BO's competition here
FACT.NS vs KRISHANA.NS Comparison May 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 592.1B. In comparison, KRISHANA.NS has a market cap of 41.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹916.80, while KRISHANA.NS trades at ₹680.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 2033.33, whereas KRISHANA.NS's P/E ratio is 22.77. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to KRISHANA.NS's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is less volatile compared to KRISHANA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check KRISHANA.NS's competition here
FACT.NS vs NFL.BO Comparison May 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 592.1B. In comparison, NFL.BO has a market cap of 38.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹916.80, while NFL.BO trades at ₹78.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 2033.33, whereas NFL.BO's P/E ratio is 19.92. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NFL.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is less volatile compared to NFL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check NFL.BO's competition here
FACT.NS vs NFL.NS Comparison May 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 592.1B. In comparison, NFL.NS has a market cap of 38.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹916.80, while NFL.NS trades at ₹78.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 2033.33, whereas NFL.NS's P/E ratio is 19.90. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NFL.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is less volatile compared to NFL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check NFL.NS's competition here
FACT.NS vs MANGCHEFER.NS Comparison May 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 592.1B. In comparison, MANGCHEFER.NS has a market cap of 36.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹916.80, while MANGCHEFER.NS trades at ₹308.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 2033.33, whereas MANGCHEFER.NS's P/E ratio is 22.67. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MANGCHEFER.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is less volatile compared to MANGCHEFER.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check MANGCHEFER.NS's competition here
FACT.NS vs MANGCHEFER.BO Comparison May 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 592.1B. In comparison, MANGCHEFER.BO has a market cap of 36.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹916.80, while MANGCHEFER.BO trades at ₹308.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 2033.33, whereas MANGCHEFER.BO's P/E ratio is 22.63. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MANGCHEFER.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is less volatile compared to MANGCHEFER.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check MANGCHEFER.BO's competition here
FACT.NS vs BNHOLDINGS.BO Comparison May 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 592.1B. In comparison, BNHOLDINGS.BO has a market cap of 34.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹916.80, while BNHOLDINGS.BO trades at ₹355.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 2033.33, whereas BNHOLDINGS.BO's P/E ratio is 26.71. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BNHOLDINGS.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is less volatile compared to BNHOLDINGS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check BNHOLDINGS.BO's competition here
FACT.NS vs BHAGCHEM.BO Comparison May 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 592.1B. In comparison, BHAGCHEM.BO has a market cap of 34.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹916.80, while BHAGCHEM.BO trades at ₹262.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 2033.33, whereas BHAGCHEM.BO's P/E ratio is 262.87. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BHAGCHEM.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is more volatile compared to BHAGCHEM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check BHAGCHEM.BO's competition here
FACT.NS vs BHAGCHEM.NS Comparison May 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 592.1B. In comparison, BHAGCHEM.NS has a market cap of 34.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹916.80, while BHAGCHEM.NS trades at ₹261.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 2033.33, whereas BHAGCHEM.NS's P/E ratio is 261.39. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BHAGCHEM.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is less volatile compared to BHAGCHEM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check BHAGCHEM.NS's competition here
FACT.NS vs NACLIND.BO Comparison May 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 592.1B. In comparison, NACLIND.BO has a market cap of 33.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹916.80, while NACLIND.BO trades at ₹179.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 2033.33, whereas NACLIND.BO's P/E ratio is -85.22. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NACLIND.BO's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is less volatile compared to NACLIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check NACLIND.BO's competition here
FACT.NS vs NACLIND.NS Comparison May 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 592.1B. In comparison, NACLIND.NS has a market cap of 33.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹916.80, while NACLIND.NS trades at ₹180.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 2033.33, whereas NACLIND.NS's P/E ratio is -85.02. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NACLIND.NS's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is less volatile compared to NACLIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check NACLIND.NS's competition here
FACT.NS vs VENKYS.BO Comparison May 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 592.1B. In comparison, VENKYS.BO has a market cap of 24.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹916.80, while VENKYS.BO trades at ₹1,714.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 2033.33, whereas VENKYS.BO's P/E ratio is -57.49. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to VENKYS.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is less volatile compared to VENKYS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check VENKYS.BO's competition here
FACT.NS vs KSE.NS Comparison May 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 592.1B. In comparison, KSE.NS has a market cap of 22.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹916.80, while KSE.NS trades at ₹697.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 2033.33, whereas KSE.NS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to KSE.NS's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is more volatile compared to KSE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check KSE.NS's competition here
FACT.NS vs INSECTICID.NS Comparison May 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 592.1B. In comparison, INSECTICID.NS has a market cap of 20.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹916.80, while INSECTICID.NS trades at ₹720.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 2033.33, whereas INSECTICID.NS's P/E ratio is 14.62. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to INSECTICID.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS and INSECTICID.NS have similar daily volatility (1.94).Check INSECTICID.NS's competition here
FACT.NS vs INSECTICID.BO Comparison May 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 592.1B. In comparison, INSECTICID.BO has a market cap of 20.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹916.80, while INSECTICID.BO trades at ₹717.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 2033.33, whereas INSECTICID.BO's P/E ratio is 14.56. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to INSECTICID.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is more volatile compared to INSECTICID.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check INSECTICID.BO's competition here
FACT.NS vs IPL.BO Comparison May 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 592.1B. In comparison, IPL.BO has a market cap of 18.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹916.80, while IPL.BO trades at ₹162.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 2033.33, whereas IPL.BO's P/E ratio is 16.50. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to IPL.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is less volatile compared to IPL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check IPL.BO's competition here
FACT.NS vs IPL.NS Comparison May 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 592.1B. In comparison, IPL.NS has a market cap of 18.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹916.80, while IPL.NS trades at ₹162.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 2033.33, whereas IPL.NS's P/E ratio is 16.54. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to IPL.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is less volatile compared to IPL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check IPL.NS's competition here
FACT.NS vs ASTEC.NS Comparison May 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 592.1B. In comparison, ASTEC.NS has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹916.80, while ASTEC.NS trades at ₹714.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 2033.33, whereas ASTEC.NS's P/E ratio is -18.84. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ASTEC.NS's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is less volatile compared to ASTEC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check ASTEC.NS's competition here
FACT.NS vs ASTEC.BO Comparison May 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 592.1B. In comparison, ASTEC.BO has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹916.80, while ASTEC.BO trades at ₹715.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 2033.33, whereas ASTEC.BO's P/E ratio is -18.72. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ASTEC.BO's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is less volatile compared to ASTEC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check ASTEC.BO's competition here
FACT.NS vs MOL.BO Comparison May 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 592.1B. In comparison, MOL.BO has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹916.80, while MOL.BO trades at ₹59.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 2033.33, whereas MOL.BO's P/E ratio is 34.67. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MOL.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is less volatile compared to MOL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check MOL.BO's competition here
FACT.NS vs MOL.NS Comparison May 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 592.1B. In comparison, MOL.NS has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹916.80, while MOL.NS trades at ₹59.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 2033.33, whereas MOL.NS's P/E ratio is 36.84. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MOL.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is less volatile compared to MOL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check MOL.NS's competition here
FACT.NS vs SPIC.BO Comparison May 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 592.1B. In comparison, SPIC.BO has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹916.80, while SPIC.BO trades at ₹71.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 2033.33, whereas SPIC.BO's P/E ratio is 7.93. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SPIC.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is less volatile compared to SPIC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check SPIC.BO's competition here
FACT.NS vs SPIC.NS Comparison May 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 592.1B. In comparison, SPIC.NS has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹916.80, while SPIC.NS trades at ₹71.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 2033.33, whereas SPIC.NS's P/E ratio is 7.29. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SPIC.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS and SPIC.NS have similar daily volatility (1.94).Check SPIC.NS's competition here
FACT.NS vs BHARATRAS.NS Comparison May 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 592.1B. In comparison, BHARATRAS.NS has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹916.80, while BHARATRAS.NS trades at ₹1,451.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 2033.33, whereas BHARATRAS.NS's P/E ratio is 17.94. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BHARATRAS.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is less volatile compared to BHARATRAS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check BHARATRAS.NS's competition here
FACT.NS vs BHARATRAS.BO Comparison May 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 592.1B. In comparison, BHARATRAS.BO has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹916.80, while BHARATRAS.BO trades at ₹1,456.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 2033.33, whereas BHARATRAS.BO's P/E ratio is 17.85. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BHARATRAS.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is less volatile compared to BHARATRAS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check BHARATRAS.BO's competition here
FACT.NS vs MADRASFERT.BO Comparison May 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 592.1B. In comparison, MADRASFERT.BO has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹916.80, while MADRASFERT.BO trades at ₹70.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 2033.33, whereas MADRASFERT.BO's P/E ratio is 155.84. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MADRASFERT.BO's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is more volatile compared to MADRASFERT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check MADRASFERT.BO's competition here
FACT.NS vs MADRASFERT.NS Comparison May 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 592.1B. In comparison, MADRASFERT.NS has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹916.80, while MADRASFERT.NS trades at ₹70.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 2033.33, whereas MADRASFERT.NS's P/E ratio is 155.64. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MADRASFERT.NS's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is more volatile compared to MADRASFERT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check MADRASFERT.NS's competition here
FACT.NS vs ZUARI.NS Comparison May 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 592.1B. In comparison, ZUARI.NS has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹916.80, while ZUARI.NS trades at ₹247.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 2033.33, whereas ZUARI.NS's P/E ratio is 1.07. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ZUARI.NS's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is less volatile compared to ZUARI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check ZUARI.NS's competition here
FACT.NS vs BSHSL.NS Comparison May 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 592.1B. In comparison, BSHSL.NS has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹916.80, while BSHSL.NS trades at ₹98.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 2033.33, whereas BSHSL.NS's P/E ratio is 36.62. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BSHSL.NS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is less volatile compared to BSHSL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check BSHSL.NS's competition here
FACT.NS vs DHARMAJ.NS Comparison May 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 592.1B. In comparison, DHARMAJ.NS has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹916.80, while DHARMAJ.NS trades at ₹276.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 2033.33, whereas DHARMAJ.NS's P/E ratio is 19.03. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DHARMAJ.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is less volatile compared to DHARMAJ.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check DHARMAJ.NS's competition here
FACT.NS vs DHARMAJ.BO Comparison May 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 592.1B. In comparison, DHARMAJ.BO has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹916.80, while DHARMAJ.BO trades at ₹278.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 2033.33, whereas DHARMAJ.BO's P/E ratio is 19.49. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DHARMAJ.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is less volatile compared to DHARMAJ.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check DHARMAJ.BO's competition here
FACT.NS vs BAJAJST.BO Comparison May 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 592.1B. In comparison, BAJAJST.BO has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹916.80, while BAJAJST.BO trades at ₹445.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 2033.33, whereas BAJAJST.BO's P/E ratio is 17.91. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BAJAJST.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is less volatile compared to BAJAJST.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check BAJAJST.BO's competition here
FACT.NS vs HERANBA.BO Comparison May 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 592.1B. In comparison, HERANBA.BO has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹916.80, while HERANBA.BO trades at ₹225.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 2033.33, whereas HERANBA.BO's P/E ratio is -14.77. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HERANBA.BO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is less volatile compared to HERANBA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check HERANBA.BO's competition here
FACT.NS vs HERANBA.NS Comparison May 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 592.1B. In comparison, HERANBA.NS has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹916.80, while HERANBA.NS trades at ₹225.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 2033.33, whereas HERANBA.NS's P/E ratio is -14.68. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HERANBA.NS's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is less volatile compared to HERANBA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check HERANBA.NS's competition here
FACT.NS vs BLUECLOUDS.BO Comparison May 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 592.1B. In comparison, BLUECLOUDS.BO has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹916.80, while BLUECLOUDS.BO trades at ₹19.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 2033.33, whereas BLUECLOUDS.BO's P/E ratio is 14.23. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BLUECLOUDS.BO's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is less volatile compared to BLUECLOUDS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check BLUECLOUDS.BO's competition here
FACT.NS vs KSE.BO Comparison May 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 592.1B. In comparison, KSE.BO has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹916.80, while KSE.BO trades at ₹212.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 2033.33, whereas KSE.BO's P/E ratio is 5.34. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to KSE.BO's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is less volatile compared to KSE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check KSE.BO's competition here
FACT.NS vs BESTAGRO.NS Comparison May 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 592.1B. In comparison, BESTAGRO.NS has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹916.80, while BESTAGRO.NS trades at ₹19.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 2033.33, whereas BESTAGRO.NS's P/E ratio is 9.79. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BESTAGRO.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is less volatile compared to BESTAGRO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check BESTAGRO.NS's competition here
FACT.NS vs BESTAGRO.BO Comparison May 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 592.1B. In comparison, BESTAGRO.BO has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹916.80, while BESTAGRO.BO trades at ₹19.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 2033.33, whereas BESTAGRO.BO's P/E ratio is 9.91. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BESTAGRO.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is less volatile compared to BESTAGRO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check BESTAGRO.BO's competition here
FACT.NS vs SHINDL.BO Comparison May 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 592.1B. In comparison, SHINDL.BO has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹916.80, while SHINDL.BO trades at ₹151.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 2033.33, whereas SHINDL.BO's P/E ratio is 48.07. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SHINDL.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is more volatile compared to SHINDL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check SHINDL.BO's competition here
FACT.NS vs KHAICHEM.BO Comparison May 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 592.1B. In comparison, KHAICHEM.BO has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹916.80, while KHAICHEM.BO trades at ₹60.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 2033.33, whereas KHAICHEM.BO's P/E ratio is 8.21. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to KHAICHEM.BO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is less volatile compared to KHAICHEM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check KHAICHEM.BO's competition here
FACT.NS vs KHAICHEM.NS Comparison May 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 592.1B. In comparison, KHAICHEM.NS has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹916.80, while KHAICHEM.NS trades at ₹60.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 2033.33, whereas KHAICHEM.NS's P/E ratio is 8.16. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to KHAICHEM.NS's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is less volatile compared to KHAICHEM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check KHAICHEM.NS's competition here
FACT.NS vs SVRL.BO Comparison May 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 592.1B. In comparison, SVRL.BO has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹916.80, while SVRL.BO trades at ₹227.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 2033.33, whereas SVRL.BO's P/E ratio is 20.77. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SVRL.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is less volatile compared to SVRL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check SVRL.BO's competition here
FACT.NS vs MISHTANN.BO Comparison May 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 592.1B. In comparison, MISHTANN.BO has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹916.80, while MISHTANN.BO trades at ₹4.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 2033.33, whereas MISHTANN.BO's P/E ratio is 1.49. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MISHTANN.BO's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is more volatile compared to MISHTANN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check MISHTANN.BO's competition here
FACT.NS vs RAMAPHO.BO Comparison May 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 592.1B. In comparison, RAMAPHO.BO has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹916.80, while RAMAPHO.BO trades at ₹142.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 2033.33, whereas RAMAPHO.BO's P/E ratio is 9.37. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RAMAPHO.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is less volatile compared to RAMAPHO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check RAMAPHO.BO's competition here
FACT.NS vs KNAGRI.NS Comparison May 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 592.1B. In comparison, KNAGRI.NS has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹916.80, while KNAGRI.NS trades at ₹190.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 2033.33, whereas KNAGRI.NS's P/E ratio is 13.36. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to KNAGRI.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is less volatile compared to KNAGRI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check KNAGRI.NS's competition here
FACT.NS vs RAMAPHO.NS Comparison May 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 592.1B. In comparison, RAMAPHO.NS has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹916.80, while RAMAPHO.NS trades at ₹141.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 2033.33, whereas RAMAPHO.NS's P/E ratio is 9.27. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RAMAPHO.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is less volatile compared to RAMAPHO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check RAMAPHO.NS's competition here
FACT.NS vs ARIES.NS Comparison May 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 592.1B. In comparison, ARIES.NS has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹916.80, while ARIES.NS trades at ₹378.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 2033.33, whereas ARIES.NS's P/E ratio is 11.20. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ARIES.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is less volatile compared to ARIES.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check ARIES.NS's competition here
FACT.NS vs MODINATUR.BO Comparison May 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 592.1B. In comparison, MODINATUR.BO has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹916.80, while MODINATUR.BO trades at ₹365.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 2033.33, whereas MODINATUR.BO's P/E ratio is 12.52. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MODINATUR.BO's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is less volatile compared to MODINATUR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check MODINATUR.BO's competition here
FACT.NS vs SHIVALIK.NS Comparison May 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 592.1B. In comparison, SHIVALIK.NS has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹916.80, while SHIVALIK.NS trades at ₹278.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 2033.33, whereas SHIVALIK.NS's P/E ratio is 36.90. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SHIVALIK.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is less volatile compared to SHIVALIK.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check SHIVALIK.NS's competition here
FACT.NS vs IGCL.NS Comparison May 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 592.1B. In comparison, IGCL.NS has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹916.80, while IGCL.NS trades at ₹70.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 2033.33, whereas IGCL.NS's P/E ratio is 12.09. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to IGCL.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is less volatile compared to IGCL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check IGCL.NS's competition here
FACT.NS vs GOODRICKE.BO Comparison May 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 592.1B. In comparison, GOODRICKE.BO has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹916.80, while GOODRICKE.BO trades at ₹183.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 2033.33, whereas GOODRICKE.BO's P/E ratio is 21.75. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GOODRICKE.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is less volatile compared to GOODRICKE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check GOODRICKE.BO's competition here
FACT.NS vs NATHBIOGEN.NS Comparison May 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 592.1B. In comparison, NATHBIOGEN.NS has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹916.80, while NATHBIOGEN.NS trades at ₹174.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 2033.33, whereas NATHBIOGEN.NS's P/E ratio is 7.80. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NATHBIOGEN.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is less volatile compared to NATHBIOGEN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check NATHBIOGEN.NS's competition here
FACT.NS vs NATHBIOGEN.BO Comparison May 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 592.1B. In comparison, NATHBIOGEN.BO has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹916.80, while NATHBIOGEN.BO trades at ₹174.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 2033.33, whereas NATHBIOGEN.BO's P/E ratio is 7.75. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NATHBIOGEN.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is less volatile compared to NATHBIOGEN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check NATHBIOGEN.BO's competition here
FACT.NS vs KINGSINFR.BO Comparison May 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 592.1B. In comparison, KINGSINFR.BO has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹916.80, while KINGSINFR.BO trades at ₹129.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 2033.33, whereas KINGSINFR.BO's P/E ratio is 22.29. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to KINGSINFR.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is less volatile compared to KINGSINFR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check KINGSINFR.BO's competition here
FACT.NS vs NOVAAGRI.NS Comparison May 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 592.1B. In comparison, NOVAAGRI.NS has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹916.80, while NOVAAGRI.NS trades at ₹29.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 2033.33, whereas NOVAAGRI.NS's P/E ratio is 14.91. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NOVAAGRI.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is less volatile compared to NOVAAGRI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check NOVAAGRI.NS's competition here
FACT.NS vs RBS.NS Comparison May 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 592.1B. In comparison, RBS.NS has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹916.80, while RBS.NS trades at ₹102.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 2033.33, whereas RBS.NS's P/E ratio is 15.48. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RBS.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is less volatile compared to RBS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check RBS.NS's competition here
FACT.NS vs NAGAFERT.NS Comparison May 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 592.1B. In comparison, NAGAFERT.NS has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹916.80, while NAGAFERT.NS trades at ₹3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 2033.33, whereas NAGAFERT.NS's P/E ratio is -8.52. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NAGAFERT.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is less volatile compared to NAGAFERT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check NAGAFERT.NS's competition here
FACT.NS vs NAGAFERT.BO Comparison May 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 592.1B. In comparison, NAGAFERT.BO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹916.80, while NAGAFERT.BO trades at ₹3.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 2033.33, whereas NAGAFERT.BO's P/E ratio is -8.48. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NAGAFERT.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is less volatile compared to NAGAFERT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check NAGAFERT.BO's competition here
FACT.NS vs INDOUS.NS Comparison May 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 592.1B. In comparison, INDOUS.NS has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹916.80, while INDOUS.NS trades at ₹112.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 2033.33, whereas INDOUS.NS's P/E ratio is 14.73. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to INDOUS.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is less volatile compared to INDOUS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check INDOUS.NS's competition here
FACT.NS vs INDOUS.BO Comparison May 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 592.1B. In comparison, INDOUS.BO has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹916.80, while INDOUS.BO trades at ₹113.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 2033.33, whereas INDOUS.BO's P/E ratio is 14.50. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to INDOUS.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is less volatile compared to INDOUS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check INDOUS.BO's competition here
FACT.NS vs HOACFOODS.NS Comparison May 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 592.1B. In comparison, HOACFOODS.NS has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹916.80, while HOACFOODS.NS trades at ₹484.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 2033.33, whereas HOACFOODS.NS's P/E ratio is 68.15. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HOACFOODS.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is less volatile compared to HOACFOODS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check HOACFOODS.NS's competition here
FACT.NS vs VIJSOLX.BO Comparison May 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 592.1B. In comparison, VIJSOLX.BO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹916.80, while VIJSOLX.BO trades at ₹587.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 2033.33, whereas VIJSOLX.BO's P/E ratio is 12.31. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to VIJSOLX.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is less volatile compared to VIJSOLX.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check VIJSOLX.BO's competition here
FACT.NS vs EQUIPPP.BO Comparison May 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 592.1B. In comparison, EQUIPPP.BO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹916.80, while EQUIPPP.BO trades at ₹16.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 2033.33, whereas EQUIPPP.BO's P/E ratio is 248.57. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to EQUIPPP.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is more volatile compared to EQUIPPP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check EQUIPPP.BO's competition here
FACT.NS vs EQUIPPP.NS Comparison May 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 592.1B. In comparison, EQUIPPP.NS has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹916.80, while EQUIPPP.NS trades at ₹16.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 2033.33, whereas EQUIPPP.NS's P/E ratio is 242.86. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to EQUIPPP.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is less volatile compared to EQUIPPP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check EQUIPPP.NS's competition here
FACT.NS vs MSL.BO Comparison May 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 592.1B. In comparison, MSL.BO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹916.80, while MSL.BO trades at ₹140.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 2033.33, whereas MSL.BO's P/E ratio is 14.63. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MSL.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is less volatile compared to MSL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check MSL.BO's competition here
FACT.NS vs BHARATAGRI.BO Comparison May 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 592.1B. In comparison, BHARATAGRI.BO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹916.80, while BHARATAGRI.BO trades at ₹30.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 2033.33, whereas BHARATAGRI.BO's P/E ratio is -75.66. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BHARATAGRI.BO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is less volatile compared to BHARATAGRI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check BHARATAGRI.BO's competition here
FACT.NS vs SBECSUG.BO Comparison May 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 592.1B. In comparison, SBECSUG.BO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹916.80, while SBECSUG.BO trades at ₹31.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 2033.33, whereas SBECSUG.BO's P/E ratio is -5.77. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SBECSUG.BO's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is less volatile compared to SBECSUG.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check SBECSUG.BO's competition here
FACT.NS vs NARMADA.BO Comparison May 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 592.1B. In comparison, NARMADA.BO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹916.80, while NARMADA.BO trades at ₹37.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 2033.33, whereas NARMADA.BO's P/E ratio is 34.09. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NARMADA.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is less volatile compared to NARMADA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check NARMADA.BO's competition here
FACT.NS vs SSLEL.BO Comparison May 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 592.1B. In comparison, SSLEL.BO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹916.80, while SSLEL.BO trades at ₹275.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 2033.33, whereas SSLEL.BO's P/E ratio is -6.04. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SSLEL.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is less volatile compared to SSLEL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check SSLEL.BO's competition here
FACT.NS vs NARMADA.NS Comparison May 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 592.1B. In comparison, NARMADA.NS has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹916.80, while NARMADA.NS trades at ₹36.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 2033.33, whereas NARMADA.NS's P/E ratio is 33.61. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NARMADA.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is less volatile compared to NARMADA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check NARMADA.NS's competition here
FACT.NS vs INDSUCR.BO Comparison May 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 592.1B. In comparison, INDSUCR.BO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹916.80, while INDSUCR.BO trades at ₹82.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 2033.33, whereas INDSUCR.BO's P/E ratio is 3.36. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to INDSUCR.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is less volatile compared to INDSUCR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check INDSUCR.BO's competition here