The Fertilisers And Chemicals Travancore Limited
The Fertilisers And Chemicals Travancore Limited (FACT.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FACT.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Agricultural Inputs Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FACT.NS | ₹852.35 | -1.00% | 554.9B | 1824.68 | ₹0.47 | +0.05% |
| COROMANDEL.BO | ₹2,094.10 | -2.31% | 635.1B | 26.53 | ₹81.24 | +0.84% |
| COROMANDEL.NS | ₹2,093.60 | -2.46% | 635.1B | 26.14 | ₹82.42 | +0.84% |
| FACT.BO | ₹851.55 | -1.03% | 554.8B | 1786.25 | ₹0.48 | +0.05% |
| UPL.NS | ₹643.75 | +0.27% | 544.4B | 30.77 | ₹20.96 | +0.93% |
| PIIND.BO | ₹2,911.30 | +1.12% | 447.9B | 30.87 | ₹95.65 | +0.51% |
| PIIND.NS | ₹2,909.40 | +1.00% | 447.8B | 30.82 | ₹95.77 | +0.51% |
| BAYERCROP.NS | ₹4,893.00 | +1.75% | 216B | 32.23 | ₹149.08 | +2.60% |
| SUMICHEM.NS | ₹422.20 | +1.70% | 208.9B | 39.23 | ₹10.67 | +0.29% |
| SUMICHEM.BO | ₹422.15 | +1.69% | 208.7B | 39.33 | ₹10.63 | +0.29% |
Stock Comparison
FACT.NS vs COROMANDEL.BO Comparison April 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 554.9B. In comparison, COROMANDEL.BO has a market cap of 635.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹852.35, while COROMANDEL.BO trades at ₹2,094.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1824.68, whereas COROMANDEL.BO's P/E ratio is 26.53. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to COROMANDEL.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is less volatile compared to COROMANDEL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check COROMANDEL.BO's competition here
FACT.NS vs COROMANDEL.NS Comparison April 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 554.9B. In comparison, COROMANDEL.NS has a market cap of 635.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹852.35, while COROMANDEL.NS trades at ₹2,093.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1824.68, whereas COROMANDEL.NS's P/E ratio is 26.14. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to COROMANDEL.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is less volatile compared to COROMANDEL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check COROMANDEL.NS's competition here
FACT.NS vs FACT.BO Comparison April 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 554.9B. In comparison, FACT.BO has a market cap of 554.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹852.35, while FACT.BO trades at ₹851.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1824.68, whereas FACT.BO's P/E ratio is 1786.25. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FACT.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is less volatile compared to FACT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check FACT.BO's competition here
FACT.NS vs UPL.NS Comparison April 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 554.9B. In comparison, UPL.NS has a market cap of 544.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹852.35, while UPL.NS trades at ₹643.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1824.68, whereas UPL.NS's P/E ratio is 30.77. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to UPL.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is less volatile compared to UPL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check UPL.NS's competition here
FACT.NS vs PIIND.BO Comparison April 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 554.9B. In comparison, PIIND.BO has a market cap of 447.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹852.35, while PIIND.BO trades at ₹2,911.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1824.68, whereas PIIND.BO's P/E ratio is 30.87. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PIIND.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is more volatile compared to PIIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check PIIND.BO's competition here
FACT.NS vs PIIND.NS Comparison April 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 554.9B. In comparison, PIIND.NS has a market cap of 447.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹852.35, while PIIND.NS trades at ₹2,909.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1824.68, whereas PIIND.NS's P/E ratio is 30.82. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PIIND.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is more volatile compared to PIIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check PIIND.NS's competition here
FACT.NS vs BAYERCROP.NS Comparison April 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 554.9B. In comparison, BAYERCROP.NS has a market cap of 216B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹852.35, while BAYERCROP.NS trades at ₹4,893.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1824.68, whereas BAYERCROP.NS's P/E ratio is 32.23. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BAYERCROP.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is less volatile compared to BAYERCROP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check BAYERCROP.NS's competition here
FACT.NS vs SUMICHEM.NS Comparison April 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 554.9B. In comparison, SUMICHEM.NS has a market cap of 208.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹852.35, while SUMICHEM.NS trades at ₹422.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1824.68, whereas SUMICHEM.NS's P/E ratio is 39.23. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SUMICHEM.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is less volatile compared to SUMICHEM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check SUMICHEM.NS's competition here
FACT.NS vs SUMICHEM.BO Comparison April 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 554.9B. In comparison, SUMICHEM.BO has a market cap of 208.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹852.35, while SUMICHEM.BO trades at ₹422.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1824.68, whereas SUMICHEM.BO's P/E ratio is 39.33. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SUMICHEM.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is less volatile compared to SUMICHEM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check SUMICHEM.BO's competition here
FACT.NS vs CHAMBLFERT.NS Comparison April 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 554.9B. In comparison, CHAMBLFERT.NS has a market cap of 183B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹852.35, while CHAMBLFERT.NS trades at ₹457.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1824.68, whereas CHAMBLFERT.NS's P/E ratio is 9.56. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CHAMBLFERT.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is more volatile compared to CHAMBLFERT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check CHAMBLFERT.NS's competition here
FACT.NS vs CHAMBLFERT.BO Comparison April 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 554.9B. In comparison, CHAMBLFERT.BO has a market cap of 182.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹852.35, while CHAMBLFERT.BO trades at ₹457.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1824.68, whereas CHAMBLFERT.BO's P/E ratio is 9.82. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CHAMBLFERT.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is more volatile compared to CHAMBLFERT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check CHAMBLFERT.BO's competition here
FACT.NS vs ATUL7.BO Comparison April 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 554.9B. In comparison, ATUL7.BO has a market cap of 179B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹852.35, while ATUL7.BO trades at ₹7,100.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1824.68, whereas ATUL7.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ATUL7.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is more volatile compared to ATUL7.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check ATUL7.BO's competition here
FACT.NS vs EIDPARRY.BO Comparison April 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 554.9B. In comparison, EIDPARRY.BO has a market cap of 151.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹852.35, while EIDPARRY.BO trades at ₹860.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1824.68, whereas EIDPARRY.BO's P/E ratio is 13.19. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to EIDPARRY.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is more volatile compared to EIDPARRY.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check EIDPARRY.BO's competition here
FACT.NS vs PARADEEP.NS Comparison April 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 554.9B. In comparison, PARADEEP.NS has a market cap of 98.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹852.35, while PARADEEP.NS trades at ₹120.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1824.68, whereas PARADEEP.NS's P/E ratio is 11.95. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PARADEEP.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is less volatile compared to PARADEEP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check PARADEEP.NS's competition here
FACT.NS vs PARADEEP.BO Comparison April 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 554.9B. In comparison, PARADEEP.BO has a market cap of 98.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹852.35, while PARADEEP.BO trades at ₹120.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1824.68, whereas PARADEEP.BO's P/E ratio is 12.15. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PARADEEP.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is less volatile compared to PARADEEP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check PARADEEP.BO's competition here
FACT.NS vs SHARDACROP.NS Comparison April 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 554.9B. In comparison, SHARDACROP.NS has a market cap of 95.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹852.35, while SHARDACROP.NS trades at ₹1,043.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1824.68, whereas SHARDACROP.NS's P/E ratio is 16.87. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SHARDACROP.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is less volatile compared to SHARDACROP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check SHARDACROP.NS's competition here
FACT.NS vs SHARDACROP.BO Comparison April 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 554.9B. In comparison, SHARDACROP.BO has a market cap of 95.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹852.35, while SHARDACROP.BO trades at ₹1,042.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1824.68, whereas SHARDACROP.BO's P/E ratio is 17.11. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SHARDACROP.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is less volatile compared to SHARDACROP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check SHARDACROP.BO's competition here
FACT.NS vs RCF.BO Comparison April 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 554.9B. In comparison, RCF.BO has a market cap of 70.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹852.35, while RCF.BO trades at ₹126.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1824.68, whereas RCF.BO's P/E ratio is 22.61. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RCF.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is more volatile compared to RCF.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check RCF.BO's competition here
FACT.NS vs RCF.NS Comparison April 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 554.9B. In comparison, RCF.NS has a market cap of 70.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹852.35, while RCF.NS trades at ₹126.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1824.68, whereas RCF.NS's P/E ratio is 22.61. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RCF.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is less volatile compared to RCF.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check RCF.NS's competition here
FACT.NS vs GSFC.NS Comparison April 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 554.9B. In comparison, GSFC.NS has a market cap of 65.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹852.35, while GSFC.NS trades at ₹167.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1824.68, whereas GSFC.NS's P/E ratio is 9.42. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GSFC.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is less volatile compared to GSFC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check GSFC.NS's competition here
FACT.NS vs GSFC.BO Comparison April 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 554.9B. In comparison, GSFC.BO has a market cap of 65.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹852.35, while GSFC.BO trades at ₹167.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1824.68, whereas GSFC.BO's P/E ratio is 9.77. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GSFC.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is less volatile compared to GSFC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check GSFC.BO's competition here
FACT.NS vs PICCADIL.BO Comparison April 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 554.9B. In comparison, PICCADIL.BO has a market cap of 56.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹852.35, while PICCADIL.BO trades at ₹559.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1824.68, whereas PICCADIL.BO's P/E ratio is 41.33. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PICCADIL.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is more volatile compared to PICCADIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check PICCADIL.BO's competition here
FACT.NS vs RALLIS.BO Comparison April 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 554.9B. In comparison, RALLIS.BO has a market cap of 50.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹852.35, while RALLIS.BO trades at ₹258.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1824.68, whereas RALLIS.BO's P/E ratio is 30.10. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RALLIS.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is more volatile compared to RALLIS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check RALLIS.BO's competition here
FACT.NS vs RALLIS.NS Comparison April 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 554.9B. In comparison, RALLIS.NS has a market cap of 50.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹852.35, while RALLIS.NS trades at ₹257.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1824.68, whereas RALLIS.NS's P/E ratio is 29.44. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RALLIS.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is more volatile compared to RALLIS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check RALLIS.NS's competition here
FACT.NS vs KSCL.BO Comparison April 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 554.9B. In comparison, KSCL.BO has a market cap of 47.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹852.35, while KSCL.BO trades at ₹927.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1824.68, whereas KSCL.BO's P/E ratio is 15.69. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to KSCL.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is less volatile compared to KSCL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check KSCL.BO's competition here
FACT.NS vs DHANUKA.BO Comparison April 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 554.9B. In comparison, DHANUKA.BO has a market cap of 46.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹852.35, while DHANUKA.BO trades at ₹1,008.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1824.68, whereas DHANUKA.BO's P/E ratio is 6.56. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DHANUKA.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is more volatile compared to DHANUKA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check DHANUKA.BO's competition here
FACT.NS vs DHANUKA.NS Comparison April 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 554.9B. In comparison, DHANUKA.NS has a market cap of 46.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹852.35, while DHANUKA.NS trades at ₹1,007.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1824.68, whereas DHANUKA.NS's P/E ratio is 6.55. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DHANUKA.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is more volatile compared to DHANUKA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check DHANUKA.NS's competition here
FACT.NS vs MBAPL.NS Comparison April 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 554.9B. In comparison, MBAPL.NS has a market cap of 45.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹852.35, while MBAPL.NS trades at ₹528.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1824.68, whereas MBAPL.NS's P/E ratio is 43.76. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MBAPL.NS's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is less volatile compared to MBAPL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check MBAPL.NS's competition here
FACT.NS vs NFL.BO Comparison April 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 554.9B. In comparison, NFL.BO has a market cap of 37.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹852.35, while NFL.BO trades at ₹74.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1824.68, whereas NFL.BO's P/E ratio is 19.03. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NFL.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is less volatile compared to NFL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check NFL.BO's competition here
FACT.NS vs NFL.NS Comparison April 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 554.9B. In comparison, NFL.NS has a market cap of 37B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹852.35, while NFL.NS trades at ₹74.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1824.68, whereas NFL.NS's P/E ratio is 19.01. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NFL.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is less volatile compared to NFL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check NFL.NS's competition here
FACT.NS vs MANGCHEFER.NS Comparison April 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 554.9B. In comparison, MANGCHEFER.NS has a market cap of 36.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹852.35, while MANGCHEFER.NS trades at ₹308.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1824.68, whereas MANGCHEFER.NS's P/E ratio is 22.67. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MANGCHEFER.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is more volatile compared to MANGCHEFER.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check MANGCHEFER.NS's competition here
FACT.NS vs MANGCHEFER.BO Comparison April 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 554.9B. In comparison, MANGCHEFER.BO has a market cap of 36.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹852.35, while MANGCHEFER.BO trades at ₹308.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1824.68, whereas MANGCHEFER.BO's P/E ratio is 22.63. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MANGCHEFER.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is more volatile compared to MANGCHEFER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check MANGCHEFER.BO's competition here
FACT.NS vs KRISHANA.NS Comparison April 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 554.9B. In comparison, KRISHANA.NS has a market cap of 35.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹852.35, while KRISHANA.NS trades at ₹580.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1824.68, whereas KRISHANA.NS's P/E ratio is 27.22. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to KRISHANA.NS's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is less volatile compared to KRISHANA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check KRISHANA.NS's competition here
FACT.NS vs BNHOLDINGS.BO Comparison April 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 554.9B. In comparison, BNHOLDINGS.BO has a market cap of 34.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹852.35, while BNHOLDINGS.BO trades at ₹355.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1824.68, whereas BNHOLDINGS.BO's P/E ratio is 26.71. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BNHOLDINGS.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is less volatile compared to BNHOLDINGS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check BNHOLDINGS.BO's competition here
FACT.NS vs NACLIND.BO Comparison April 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 554.9B. In comparison, NACLIND.BO has a market cap of 32.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹852.35, while NACLIND.BO trades at ₹162.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1824.68, whereas NACLIND.BO's P/E ratio is -81.54. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NACLIND.BO's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is less volatile compared to NACLIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check NACLIND.BO's competition here
FACT.NS vs NACLIND.NS Comparison April 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 554.9B. In comparison, NACLIND.NS has a market cap of 32.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹852.35, while NACLIND.NS trades at ₹162.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1824.68, whereas NACLIND.NS's P/E ratio is -81.50. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NACLIND.NS's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is less volatile compared to NACLIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check NACLIND.NS's competition here
FACT.NS vs BHAGCHEM.BO Comparison April 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 554.9B. In comparison, BHAGCHEM.BO has a market cap of 29B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹852.35, while BHAGCHEM.BO trades at ₹211.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1824.68, whereas BHAGCHEM.BO's P/E ratio is 230.88. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BHAGCHEM.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is more volatile compared to BHAGCHEM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check BHAGCHEM.BO's competition here
FACT.NS vs BHAGCHEM.NS Comparison April 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 554.9B. In comparison, BHAGCHEM.NS has a market cap of 28.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹852.35, while BHAGCHEM.NS trades at ₹214.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1824.68, whereas BHAGCHEM.NS's P/E ratio is 229.24. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BHAGCHEM.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is less volatile compared to BHAGCHEM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check BHAGCHEM.NS's competition here
FACT.NS vs CIANAGRO.BO Comparison April 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 554.9B. In comparison, CIANAGRO.BO has a market cap of 24.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹852.35, while CIANAGRO.BO trades at ₹907.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1824.68, whereas CIANAGRO.BO's P/E ratio is 21.55. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CIANAGRO.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is more volatile compared to CIANAGRO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check CIANAGRO.BO's competition here
FACT.NS vs VENKYS.BO Comparison April 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 554.9B. In comparison, VENKYS.BO has a market cap of 24.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹852.35, while VENKYS.BO trades at ₹1,714.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1824.68, whereas VENKYS.BO's P/E ratio is -57.49. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to VENKYS.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is less volatile compared to VENKYS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check VENKYS.BO's competition here
FACT.NS vs KSE.NS Comparison April 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 554.9B. In comparison, KSE.NS has a market cap of 22.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹852.35, while KSE.NS trades at ₹697.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1824.68, whereas KSE.NS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to KSE.NS's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is more volatile compared to KSE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check KSE.NS's competition here
FACT.NS vs INSECTICID.NS Comparison April 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 554.9B. In comparison, INSECTICID.NS has a market cap of 18.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹852.35, while INSECTICID.NS trades at ₹676.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1824.68, whereas INSECTICID.NS's P/E ratio is 13.23. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to INSECTICID.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is less volatile compared to INSECTICID.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check INSECTICID.NS's competition here
FACT.NS vs INSECTICID.BO Comparison April 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 554.9B. In comparison, INSECTICID.BO has a market cap of 18.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹852.35, while INSECTICID.BO trades at ₹677.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1824.68, whereas INSECTICID.BO's P/E ratio is 13.21. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to INSECTICID.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is less volatile compared to INSECTICID.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check INSECTICID.BO's competition here
FACT.NS vs IPL.BO Comparison April 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 554.9B. In comparison, IPL.BO has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹852.35, while IPL.BO trades at ₹147.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1824.68, whereas IPL.BO's P/E ratio is 15.58. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to IPL.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is more volatile compared to IPL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check IPL.BO's competition here
FACT.NS vs IPL.NS Comparison April 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 554.9B. In comparison, IPL.NS has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹852.35, while IPL.NS trades at ₹147.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1824.68, whereas IPL.NS's P/E ratio is 15.56. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to IPL.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is more volatile compared to IPL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check IPL.NS's competition here
FACT.NS vs ASTEC.BO Comparison April 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 554.9B. In comparison, ASTEC.BO has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹852.35, while ASTEC.BO trades at ₹634.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1824.68, whereas ASTEC.BO's P/E ratio is -15.59. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ASTEC.BO's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is less volatile compared to ASTEC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check ASTEC.BO's competition here
FACT.NS vs ASTEC.NS Comparison April 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 554.9B. In comparison, ASTEC.NS has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹852.35, while ASTEC.NS trades at ₹635.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1824.68, whereas ASTEC.NS's P/E ratio is -15.58. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ASTEC.NS's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is less volatile compared to ASTEC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check ASTEC.NS's competition here
FACT.NS vs SPIC.BO Comparison April 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 554.9B. In comparison, SPIC.BO has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹852.35, while SPIC.BO trades at ₹66.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1824.68, whereas SPIC.BO's P/E ratio is 7.39. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SPIC.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is less volatile compared to SPIC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check SPIC.BO's competition here
FACT.NS vs SPIC.NS Comparison April 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 554.9B. In comparison, SPIC.NS has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹852.35, while SPIC.NS trades at ₹66.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1824.68, whereas SPIC.NS's P/E ratio is 6.80. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SPIC.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is less volatile compared to SPIC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check SPIC.NS's competition here
FACT.NS vs BHARATRAS.BO Comparison April 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 554.9B. In comparison, BHARATRAS.BO has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹852.35, while BHARATRAS.BO trades at ₹1,584.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1824.68, whereas BHARATRAS.BO's P/E ratio is 19.61. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BHARATRAS.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is less volatile compared to BHARATRAS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check BHARATRAS.BO's competition here
FACT.NS vs BHARATRAS.NS Comparison April 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 554.9B. In comparison, BHARATRAS.NS has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹852.35, while BHARATRAS.NS trades at ₹1,586.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1824.68, whereas BHARATRAS.NS's P/E ratio is 19.23. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BHARATRAS.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is less volatile compared to BHARATRAS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check BHARATRAS.NS's competition here
FACT.NS vs MOL.BO Comparison April 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 554.9B. In comparison, MOL.BO has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹852.35, while MOL.BO trades at ₹48.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1824.68, whereas MOL.BO's P/E ratio is 31.25. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MOL.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is less volatile compared to MOL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check MOL.BO's competition here
FACT.NS vs MOL.NS Comparison April 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 554.9B. In comparison, MOL.NS has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹852.35, while MOL.NS trades at ₹48.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1824.68, whereas MOL.NS's P/E ratio is 31.22. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MOL.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is less volatile compared to MOL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check MOL.NS's competition here
FACT.NS vs MADRASFERT.NS Comparison April 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 554.9B. In comparison, MADRASFERT.NS has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹852.35, while MADRASFERT.NS trades at ₹66.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1824.68, whereas MADRASFERT.NS's P/E ratio is 148.36. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MADRASFERT.NS's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is less volatile compared to MADRASFERT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check MADRASFERT.NS's competition here
FACT.NS vs MADRASFERT.BO Comparison April 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 554.9B. In comparison, MADRASFERT.BO has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹852.35, while MADRASFERT.BO trades at ₹66.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1824.68, whereas MADRASFERT.BO's P/E ratio is 148.27. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MADRASFERT.BO's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is less volatile compared to MADRASFERT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check MADRASFERT.BO's competition here
FACT.NS vs BSHSL.NS Comparison April 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 554.9B. In comparison, BSHSL.NS has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹852.35, while BSHSL.NS trades at ₹101.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1824.68, whereas BSHSL.NS's P/E ratio is 36.75. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BSHSL.NS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is less volatile compared to BSHSL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check BSHSL.NS's competition here
FACT.NS vs BAJAJST.BO Comparison April 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 554.9B. In comparison, BAJAJST.BO has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹852.35, while BAJAJST.BO trades at ₹464.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1824.68, whereas BAJAJST.BO's P/E ratio is 18.93. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BAJAJST.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is more volatile compared to BAJAJST.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check BAJAJST.BO's competition here
FACT.NS vs ZUARI.NS Comparison April 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 554.9B. In comparison, ZUARI.NS has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹852.35, while ZUARI.NS trades at ₹217.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1824.68, whereas ZUARI.NS's P/E ratio is 0.96. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ZUARI.NS's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is less volatile compared to ZUARI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check ZUARI.NS's competition here
FACT.NS vs BLUECLOUDS.BO Comparison April 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 554.9B. In comparison, BLUECLOUDS.BO has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹852.35, while BLUECLOUDS.BO trades at ₹19.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1824.68, whereas BLUECLOUDS.BO's P/E ratio is 14.87. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BLUECLOUDS.BO's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is more volatile compared to BLUECLOUDS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check BLUECLOUDS.BO's competition here
FACT.NS vs DHARMAJ.NS Comparison April 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 554.9B. In comparison, DHARMAJ.NS has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹852.35, while DHARMAJ.NS trades at ₹275.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1824.68, whereas DHARMAJ.NS's P/E ratio is 18.93. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DHARMAJ.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is less volatile compared to DHARMAJ.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check DHARMAJ.NS's competition here
FACT.NS vs DHARMAJ.BO Comparison April 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 554.9B. In comparison, DHARMAJ.BO has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹852.35, while DHARMAJ.BO trades at ₹274.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1824.68, whereas DHARMAJ.BO's P/E ratio is 18.95. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DHARMAJ.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is less volatile compared to DHARMAJ.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check DHARMAJ.BO's competition here
FACT.NS vs HERANBA.BO Comparison April 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 554.9B. In comparison, HERANBA.BO has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹852.35, while HERANBA.BO trades at ₹199.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1824.68, whereas HERANBA.BO's P/E ratio is -12.94. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HERANBA.BO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is less volatile compared to HERANBA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check HERANBA.BO's competition here
FACT.NS vs HERANBA.NS Comparison April 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 554.9B. In comparison, HERANBA.NS has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹852.35, while HERANBA.NS trades at ₹200.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1824.68, whereas HERANBA.NS's P/E ratio is -12.72. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HERANBA.NS's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is less volatile compared to HERANBA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check HERANBA.NS's competition here
FACT.NS vs KSE.BO Comparison April 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 554.9B. In comparison, KSE.BO has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹852.35, while KSE.BO trades at ₹194.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1824.68, whereas KSE.BO's P/E ratio is 5.37. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to KSE.BO's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is more volatile compared to KSE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check KSE.BO's competition here
FACT.NS vs BESTAGRO.BO Comparison April 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 554.9B. In comparison, BESTAGRO.BO has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹852.35, while BESTAGRO.BO trades at ₹17.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1824.68, whereas BESTAGRO.BO's P/E ratio is 9.20. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BESTAGRO.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is less volatile compared to BESTAGRO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check BESTAGRO.BO's competition here
FACT.NS vs BESTAGRO.NS Comparison April 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 554.9B. In comparison, BESTAGRO.NS has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹852.35, while BESTAGRO.NS trades at ₹17.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1824.68, whereas BESTAGRO.NS's P/E ratio is 8.72. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BESTAGRO.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is less volatile compared to BESTAGRO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check BESTAGRO.NS's competition here
FACT.NS vs SHINDL.BO Comparison April 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 554.9B. In comparison, SHINDL.BO has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹852.35, while SHINDL.BO trades at ₹147.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1824.68, whereas SHINDL.BO's P/E ratio is 46.99. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SHINDL.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is more volatile compared to SHINDL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check SHINDL.BO's competition here
FACT.NS vs SVRL.BO Comparison April 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 554.9B. In comparison, SVRL.BO has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹852.35, while SVRL.BO trades at ₹261.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1824.68, whereas SVRL.BO's P/E ratio is 22.77. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SVRL.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is less volatile compared to SVRL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check SVRL.BO's competition here
FACT.NS vs KNAGRI.NS Comparison April 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 554.9B. In comparison, KNAGRI.NS has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹852.35, while KNAGRI.NS trades at ₹220.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1824.68, whereas KNAGRI.NS's P/E ratio is 15.32. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to KNAGRI.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is less volatile compared to KNAGRI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check KNAGRI.NS's competition here
FACT.NS vs KHAICHEM.BO Comparison April 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 554.9B. In comparison, KHAICHEM.BO has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹852.35, while KHAICHEM.BO trades at ₹56.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1824.68, whereas KHAICHEM.BO's P/E ratio is 7.68. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to KHAICHEM.BO's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is less volatile compared to KHAICHEM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check KHAICHEM.BO's competition here
FACT.NS vs KHAICHEM.NS Comparison April 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 554.9B. In comparison, KHAICHEM.NS has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹852.35, while KHAICHEM.NS trades at ₹56.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1824.68, whereas KHAICHEM.NS's P/E ratio is 7.26. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to KHAICHEM.NS's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is less volatile compared to KHAICHEM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check KHAICHEM.NS's competition here
FACT.NS vs MODINATUR.BO Comparison April 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 554.9B. In comparison, MODINATUR.BO has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹852.35, while MODINATUR.BO trades at ₹381.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1824.68, whereas MODINATUR.BO's P/E ratio is 12.98. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MODINATUR.BO's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is less volatile compared to MODINATUR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check MODINATUR.BO's competition here
FACT.NS vs ARIES.NS Comparison April 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 554.9B. In comparison, ARIES.NS has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹852.35, while ARIES.NS trades at ₹377.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1824.68, whereas ARIES.NS's P/E ratio is 11.35. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ARIES.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is less volatile compared to ARIES.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check ARIES.NS's competition here
FACT.NS vs MISHTANN.BO Comparison April 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 554.9B. In comparison, MISHTANN.BO has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹852.35, while MISHTANN.BO trades at ₹4.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1824.68, whereas MISHTANN.BO's P/E ratio is 1.45. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MISHTANN.BO's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is less volatile compared to MISHTANN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check MISHTANN.BO's competition here
FACT.NS vs RAMAPHO.BO Comparison April 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 554.9B. In comparison, RAMAPHO.BO has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹852.35, while RAMAPHO.BO trades at ₹132.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1824.68, whereas RAMAPHO.BO's P/E ratio is 9.15. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RAMAPHO.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is less volatile compared to RAMAPHO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check RAMAPHO.BO's competition here
FACT.NS vs RAMAPHO.NS Comparison April 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 554.9B. In comparison, RAMAPHO.NS has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹852.35, while RAMAPHO.NS trades at ₹133.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1824.68, whereas RAMAPHO.NS's P/E ratio is 8.96. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RAMAPHO.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is less volatile compared to RAMAPHO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check RAMAPHO.NS's competition here
FACT.NS vs SHIVALIK.NS Comparison April 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 554.9B. In comparison, SHIVALIK.NS has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹852.35, while SHIVALIK.NS trades at ₹274.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1824.68, whereas SHIVALIK.NS's P/E ratio is 32.63. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SHIVALIK.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is less volatile compared to SHIVALIK.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check SHIVALIK.NS's competition here
FACT.NS vs IGCL.NS Comparison April 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 554.9B. In comparison, IGCL.NS has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹852.35, while IGCL.NS trades at ₹62.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1824.68, whereas IGCL.NS's P/E ratio is 11.09. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to IGCL.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is less volatile compared to IGCL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check IGCL.NS's competition here
FACT.NS vs GOODRICKE.BO Comparison April 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 554.9B. In comparison, GOODRICKE.BO has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹852.35, while GOODRICKE.BO trades at ₹160.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1824.68, whereas GOODRICKE.BO's P/E ratio is 19.59. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GOODRICKE.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is less volatile compared to GOODRICKE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check GOODRICKE.BO's competition here
FACT.NS vs KINGSINFR.BO Comparison April 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 554.9B. In comparison, KINGSINFR.BO has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹852.35, while KINGSINFR.BO trades at ₹127.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1824.68, whereas KINGSINFR.BO's P/E ratio is 23.66. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to KINGSINFR.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is less volatile compared to KINGSINFR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check KINGSINFR.BO's competition here
FACT.NS vs NATHBIOGEN.NS Comparison April 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 554.9B. In comparison, NATHBIOGEN.NS has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹852.35, while NATHBIOGEN.NS trades at ₹172.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1824.68, whereas NATHBIOGEN.NS's P/E ratio is 6.74. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NATHBIOGEN.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is less volatile compared to NATHBIOGEN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check NATHBIOGEN.NS's competition here
FACT.NS vs NATHBIOGEN.BO Comparison April 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 554.9B. In comparison, NATHBIOGEN.BO has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹852.35, while NATHBIOGEN.BO trades at ₹172.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1824.68, whereas NATHBIOGEN.BO's P/E ratio is 6.73. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NATHBIOGEN.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is less volatile compared to NATHBIOGEN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check NATHBIOGEN.BO's competition here
FACT.NS vs NOVAAGRI.NS Comparison April 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 554.9B. In comparison, NOVAAGRI.NS has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹852.35, while NOVAAGRI.NS trades at ₹28.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1824.68, whereas NOVAAGRI.NS's P/E ratio is 15.87. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NOVAAGRI.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is less volatile compared to NOVAAGRI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check NOVAAGRI.NS's competition here
FACT.NS vs NAGAFERT.BO Comparison April 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 554.9B. In comparison, NAGAFERT.BO has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹852.35, while NAGAFERT.BO trades at ₹4.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1824.68, whereas NAGAFERT.BO's P/E ratio is -8.91. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NAGAFERT.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is less volatile compared to NAGAFERT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check NAGAFERT.BO's competition here
FACT.NS vs NAGAFERT.NS Comparison April 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 554.9B. In comparison, NAGAFERT.NS has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹852.35, while NAGAFERT.NS trades at ₹4.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1824.68, whereas NAGAFERT.NS's P/E ratio is -8.83. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NAGAFERT.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is more volatile compared to NAGAFERT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check NAGAFERT.NS's competition here
FACT.NS vs INDOUS.BO Comparison April 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 554.9B. In comparison, INDOUS.BO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹852.35, while INDOUS.BO trades at ₹106.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1824.68, whereas INDOUS.BO's P/E ratio is 14.48. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to INDOUS.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is less volatile compared to INDOUS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check INDOUS.BO's competition here
FACT.NS vs INDOUS.NS Comparison April 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 554.9B. In comparison, INDOUS.NS has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹852.35, while INDOUS.NS trades at ₹106.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1824.68, whereas INDOUS.NS's P/E ratio is 14.40. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to INDOUS.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is less volatile compared to INDOUS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check INDOUS.NS's competition here
FACT.NS vs RBS.NS Comparison April 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 554.9B. In comparison, RBS.NS has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹852.35, while RBS.NS trades at ₹90.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1824.68, whereas RBS.NS's P/E ratio is 12.89. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RBS.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is less volatile compared to RBS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check RBS.NS's competition here
FACT.NS vs VIJSOLX.BO Comparison April 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 554.9B. In comparison, VIJSOLX.BO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹852.35, while VIJSOLX.BO trades at ₹585.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1824.68, whereas VIJSOLX.BO's P/E ratio is 12.51. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to VIJSOLX.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is less volatile compared to VIJSOLX.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check VIJSOLX.BO's competition here
FACT.NS vs HOACFOODS.NS Comparison April 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 554.9B. In comparison, HOACFOODS.NS has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹852.35, while HOACFOODS.NS trades at ₹423.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1824.68, whereas HOACFOODS.NS's P/E ratio is 61.51. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HOACFOODS.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is less volatile compared to HOACFOODS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check HOACFOODS.NS's competition here
FACT.NS vs EQUIPPP.BO Comparison April 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 554.9B. In comparison, EQUIPPP.BO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹852.35, while EQUIPPP.BO trades at ₹15.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1824.68, whereas EQUIPPP.BO's P/E ratio is 213.57. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to EQUIPPP.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is more volatile compared to EQUIPPP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check EQUIPPP.BO's competition here
FACT.NS vs EQUIPPP.NS Comparison April 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 554.9B. In comparison, EQUIPPP.NS has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹852.35, while EQUIPPP.NS trades at ₹14.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1824.68, whereas EQUIPPP.NS's P/E ratio is 213.14. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to EQUIPPP.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is more volatile compared to EQUIPPP.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check EQUIPPP.NS's competition here
FACT.NS vs MSL.BO Comparison April 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 554.9B. In comparison, MSL.BO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹852.35, while MSL.BO trades at ₹123.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1824.68, whereas MSL.BO's P/E ratio is 13.58. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MSL.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is less volatile compared to MSL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check MSL.BO's competition here
FACT.NS vs SBECSUG.BO Comparison April 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 554.9B. In comparison, SBECSUG.BO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹852.35, while SBECSUG.BO trades at ₹30.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1824.68, whereas SBECSUG.BO's P/E ratio is -5.51. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SBECSUG.BO's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is less volatile compared to SBECSUG.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check SBECSUG.BO's competition here
FACT.NS vs SSLEL.BO Comparison April 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 554.9B. In comparison, SSLEL.BO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹852.35, while SSLEL.BO trades at ₹267.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1824.68, whereas SSLEL.BO's P/E ratio is -5.92. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SSLEL.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is less volatile compared to SSLEL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check SSLEL.BO's competition here
FACT.NS vs NARMADA.BO Comparison April 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 554.9B. In comparison, NARMADA.BO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹852.35, while NARMADA.BO trades at ₹35.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1824.68, whereas NARMADA.BO's P/E ratio is 31.64. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NARMADA.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is more volatile compared to NARMADA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check NARMADA.BO's competition here
FACT.NS vs NARMADA.NS Comparison April 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 554.9B. In comparison, NARMADA.NS has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹852.35, while NARMADA.NS trades at ₹35.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1824.68, whereas NARMADA.NS's P/E ratio is 31.28. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NARMADA.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is less volatile compared to NARMADA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check NARMADA.NS's competition here
FACT.NS vs BHARATAGRI.BO Comparison April 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 554.9B. In comparison, BHARATAGRI.BO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹852.35, while BHARATAGRI.BO trades at ₹25.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1824.68, whereas BHARATAGRI.BO's P/E ratio is -64.95. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BHARATAGRI.BO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is less volatile compared to BHARATAGRI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check BHARATAGRI.BO's competition here
FACT.NS vs INDSUCR.BO Comparison April 2026
FACT.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FACT.NS stands at 554.9B. In comparison, INDSUCR.BO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FACT.NS is priced at ₹852.35, while INDSUCR.BO trades at ₹73.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FACT.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 1824.68, whereas INDSUCR.BO's P/E ratio is 3.16. In terms of profitability, FACT.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to INDSUCR.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FACT.NS is more volatile compared to INDSUCR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FACT.NS.Check INDSUCR.BO's competition here