UL Solutions Inc.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, CTAS has a market cap of 86.71B. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while CTAS trades at $214.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas CTAS's P/E ratio is 49.94. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to CTAS's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is more volatile compared to CTAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, TRI has a market cap of 84.42B. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while TRI trades at $187.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas TRI's P/E ratio is 39.45. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to TRI's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is more volatile compared to TRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, WOLTF has a market cap of 41.93B. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while WOLTF trades at $178.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas WOLTF's P/E ratio is 34.95. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to WOLTF's ROE of +0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is less volatile compared to WOLTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, WTKWY has a market cap of 41.30B. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while WTKWY trades at $176.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas WTKWY's P/E ratio is 34.48. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to WTKWY's ROE of +0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is less volatile compared to WTKWY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, GPN has a market cap of 19.63B. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while GPN trades at $80.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas GPN's P/E ratio is 13.03. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to GPN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is more volatile compared to GPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, RBA has a market cap of 19.61B. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while RBA trades at $105.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas RBA's P/E ratio is 52.69. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to RBA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is more volatile compared to RBA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, BMBLF has a market cap of 18.80B. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while BMBLF trades at $13.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas BMBLF's P/E ratio is 22.87. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to BMBLF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is more volatile compared to BMBLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, BXBLY has a market cap of 18.79B. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while BXBLY trades at $27.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas BXBLY's P/E ratio is 22.88. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to BXBLY's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is less volatile compared to BXBLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, DNPCF has a market cap of 14.98B. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while DNPCF trades at $30.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas DNPCF's P/E ratio is 18.26. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to DNPCF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is more volatile compared to DNPCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, BIPI has a market cap of 13.19B. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while BIPI trades at $16.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas BIPI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to BIPI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is more volatile compared to BIPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, RTO has a market cap of 11.69B. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while RTO trades at $23.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas RTO's P/E ratio is 28.72. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to RTO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is more volatile compared to RTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, IKTSF has a market cap of 10.34B. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while IKTSF trades at $64.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas IKTSF's P/E ratio is 23.00. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to IKTSF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is more volatile compared to IKTSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, RKLIF has a market cap of 10.18B. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while RKLIF trades at $4.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas RKLIF's P/E ratio is 25.31. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to RKLIF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is less volatile compared to RKLIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, IKTSY has a market cap of 10.14B. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while IKTSY trades at $63.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas IKTSY's P/E ratio is 22.55. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to IKTSY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is more volatile compared to IKTSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, ARMK has a market cap of 10.05B. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while ARMK trades at $38.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas ARMK's P/E ratio is 29.51. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to ARMK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is less volatile compared to ARMK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, TOPPY has a market cap of 9.87B. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while TOPPY trades at $16.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas TOPPY's P/E ratio is 16.18. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to TOPPY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is more volatile compared to TOPPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, SDXOF has a market cap of 9.29B. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while SDXOF trades at $63.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas SDXOF's P/E ratio is 12.28. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to SDXOF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is less volatile compared to SDXOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, SDXAY has a market cap of 9.06B. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while SDXAY trades at $12.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas SDXAY's P/E ratio is 12.01. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to SDXAY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is less volatile compared to SDXAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, TONPF has a market cap of 8.82B. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while TONPF trades at $30.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas TONPF's P/E ratio is 16.97. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to TONPF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is less volatile compared to TONPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, INPOY has a market cap of 8.71B. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while INPOY trades at $8.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas INPOY's P/E ratio is 26.52. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to INPOY's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is less volatile compared to INPOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, DNPLY has a market cap of 6.42B. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while DNPLY trades at $7.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas DNPLY's P/E ratio is 7.31. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to DNPLY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is more volatile compared to DNPLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, TLPFY has a market cap of 6.30B. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while TLPFY trades at $52.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas TLPFY's P/E ratio is 10.69. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to TLPFY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is more volatile compared to TLPFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, TLPFF has a market cap of 6.08B. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while TLPFF trades at $102.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas TLPFF's P/E ratio is 10.44. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to TLPFF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is more volatile compared to TLPFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, ELSSF has a market cap of 5.72B. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while ELSSF trades at $24.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas ELSSF's P/E ratio is 15.80. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to ELSSF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is less volatile compared to ELSSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, IAA has a market cap of 5.34B. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while IAA trades at $39.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas IAA's P/E ratio is 18.55. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to IAA's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is less volatile compared to IAA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, INPOF has a market cap of 4.97B. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while INPOF trades at $9.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas INPOF's P/E ratio is 38.42. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to INPOF's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is more volatile compared to INPOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, ISFFF has a market cap of 4.32B. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while ISFFF trades at $24.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas ISFFF's P/E ratio is 11.24. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to ISFFF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is less volatile compared to ISFFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, MMS has a market cap of 4.26B. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while MMS trades at $75.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas MMS's P/E ratio is 16.24. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to MMS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is less volatile compared to MMS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, CBZ has a market cap of 3.94B. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while CBZ trades at $72.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas CBZ's P/E ratio is 62.43. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to CBZ's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is more volatile compared to CBZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, UNF has a market cap of 3.29B. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while UNF trades at $184.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas UNF's P/E ratio is 22.89. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to UNF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is more volatile compared to UNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, ABM has a market cap of 3.16B. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while ABM trades at $50.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas ABM's P/E ratio is 39.93. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to ABM's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is more volatile compared to ABM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, FA has a market cap of 3.07B. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while FA trades at $17.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas FA's P/E ratio is -23.88. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to FA's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is less volatile compared to FA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, MITFF has a market cap of 2.45B. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while MITFF trades at $2.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas MITFF's P/E ratio is 16.68. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to MITFF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is less volatile compared to MITFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, MITFY has a market cap of 2.41B. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while MITFY trades at $7.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas MITFY's P/E ratio is 16.81. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to MITFY's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is more volatile compared to MITFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, SCGPY has a market cap of 2.35B. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while SCGPY trades at $2.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas SCGPY's P/E ratio is 42.40. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to SCGPY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is more volatile compared to SCGPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, SECCF has a market cap of 2.34B. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while SECCF trades at $2.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas SECCF's P/E ratio is 46.28. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to SECCF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is more volatile compared to SECCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, ACENY has a market cap of 2.06B. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while ACENY trades at $9.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas ACENY's P/E ratio is 28.44. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to ACENY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is less volatile compared to ACENY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, RELOF has a market cap of 1.86B. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while RELOF trades at $12.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas RELOF's P/E ratio is -68.89. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to RELOF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is less volatile compared to RELOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, APLUF has a market cap of 1.81B. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while APLUF trades at $12.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas APLUF's P/E ratio is 27.27. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to APLUF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is less volatile compared to APLUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, ISSDY has a market cap of 1.70B. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while ISSDY trades at $9.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas ISSDY's P/E ratio is 12.57. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to ISSDY's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is less volatile compared to ISSDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, LZ has a market cap of 1.64B. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while LZ trades at $9.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas LZ's P/E ratio is 56.44. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to LZ's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is less volatile compared to LZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, BV has a market cap of 1.51B. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while BV trades at $15.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas BV's P/E ratio is 58.59. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to BV's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is more volatile compared to BV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, VVI has a market cap of 1.19B. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while VVI trades at $42.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas VVI's P/E ratio is 41.68. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to VVI's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is less volatile compared to VVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, TCLAF has a market cap of 1.16B. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while TCLAF trades at $13.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas TCLAF's P/E ratio is 10.07. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to TCLAF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is more volatile compared to TCLAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, IPHLF has a market cap of 1.12B. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while IPHLF trades at $4.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas IPHLF's P/E ratio is 26.19. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to IPHLF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is less volatile compared to IPHLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, TCLCF has a market cap of 1.09B. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while TCLCF trades at $13.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas TCLCF's P/E ratio is 9.83. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to TCLCF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is more volatile compared to TCLCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, SP has a market cap of 1.07B. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while SP trades at $53.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas SP's P/E ratio is 35.29. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to SP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is more volatile compared to SP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, TDCX has a market cap of 1.03B. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while TDCX trades at $7.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas TDCX's P/E ratio is 11.69. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to TDCX's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is more volatile compared to TDCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, JSVGF has a market cap of 850.07M. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while JSVGF trades at $1.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas JSVGF's P/E ratio is 117.73. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to JSVGF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is more volatile compared to JSVGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, STGXF has a market cap of 837.48M. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while STGXF trades at $6.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas STGXF's P/E ratio is 19.41. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to STGXF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is more volatile compared to STGXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, PRSU has a market cap of 816.94M. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while PRSU trades at $28.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas PRSU's P/E ratio is -12.54. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to PRSU's ROE of +2.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is less volatile compared to PRSU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, TH has a market cap of 683.79M. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while TH trades at $6.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas TH's P/E ratio is 9.89. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to TH's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is less volatile compared to TH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, RKSLF has a market cap of 590.66M. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while RKSLF trades at $10.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas RKSLF's P/E ratio is 67.87. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to RKSLF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is less volatile compared to RKSLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, CASS has a market cap of 564.73M. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while CASS trades at $42.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas CASS's P/E ratio is 27.99. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to CASS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is more volatile compared to CASS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, GLCDF has a market cap of 539.55M. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while GLCDF trades at $18.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas GLCDF's P/E ratio is 8.89. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to GLCDF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is more volatile compared to GLCDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, GDIFF has a market cap of 509.37M. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while GDIFF trades at $21.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas GDIFF's P/E ratio is 22.07. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to GDIFF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is less volatile compared to GDIFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, ITEPF has a market cap of 448.62M. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while ITEPF trades at $1.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas ITEPF's P/E ratio is -13.68. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to ITEPF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is more volatile compared to ITEPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, KODK has a market cap of 435.33M. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while KODK trades at $5.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas KODK's P/E ratio is 5.99. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to KODK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is less volatile compared to KODK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, IRMTF has a market cap of 385.89M. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while IRMTF trades at $20.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas IRMTF's P/E ratio is 26.04. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to IRMTF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is less volatile compared to IRMTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, HZNOF has a market cap of 383.17M. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while HZNOF trades at $6.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas HZNOF's P/E ratio is 14.60. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to HZNOF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is more volatile compared to HZNOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, ACTG has a market cap of 362.24M. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while ACTG trades at $3.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas ACTG's P/E ratio is -10.47. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to ACTG's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is less volatile compared to ACTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, KPGHF has a market cap of 358.30M. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while KPGHF trades at $7.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas KPGHF's P/E ratio is 199.50. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to KPGHF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is less volatile compared to KPGHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, DELRF has a market cap of 338.02M. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while DELRF trades at $1.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas DELRF's P/E ratio is -15.18. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to DELRF's ROE of -5.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is more volatile compared to DELRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, CLNFF has a market cap of 334.34M. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while CLNFF trades at $28.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas CLNFF's P/E ratio is 102.14. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to CLNFF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is less volatile compared to CLNFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, VSSPY has a market cap of 316.58M. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while VSSPY trades at $4.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas VSSPY's P/E ratio is 4.76. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to VSSPY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is less volatile compared to VSSPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, DLUEY has a market cap of 314.23M. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while DLUEY trades at $4.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas DLUEY's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to DLUEY's ROE of -5.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is more volatile compared to DLUEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, SPIR has a market cap of 304.10M. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while SPIR trades at $9.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas SPIR's P/E ratio is -2.31. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to SPIR's ROE of -2.83%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is less volatile compared to SPIR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, QUAD has a market cap of 293.55M. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while QUAD trades at $5.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas QUAD's P/E ratio is -16.11. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to QUAD's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is less volatile compared to QUAD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, CTAGF has a market cap of 287.83M. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while CTAGF trades at $2.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas CTAGF's P/E ratio is 2.66. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to CTAGF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is less volatile compared to CTAGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, CVEO has a market cap of 281.44M. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while CVEO trades at $20.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas CVEO's P/E ratio is -13.41. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to CVEO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is less volatile compared to CVEO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, PFMT has a market cap of 278.72M. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while PFMT trades at $3.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas PFMT's P/E ratio is -35.60. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to PFMT's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is less volatile compared to PFMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, KBRLF has a market cap of 265.05M. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while KBRLF trades at $25.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas KBRLF's P/E ratio is 19.72. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to KBRLF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is less volatile compared to KBRLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, RHLD has a market cap of 246.91M. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while RHLD trades at $28.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas RHLD's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to RHLD's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is less volatile compared to RHLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, ITEGY has a market cap of 244.73M. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while ITEGY trades at $0.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas ITEGY's P/E ratio is -7.46. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to ITEGY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is more volatile compared to ITEGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, PFSW has a market cap of 170.59M. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while PFSW trades at $7.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas PFSW's P/E ratio is -17.43. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to PFSW's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is more volatile compared to PFSW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, PCRRF has a market cap of 164.00M. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while PCRRF trades at $11.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas PCRRF's P/E ratio is 7.08. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to PCRRF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is more volatile compared to PCRRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, ARC has a market cap of 146.66M. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while ARC trades at $3.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas ARC's P/E ratio is 30.82. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to ARC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is more volatile compared to ARC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, AJISF has a market cap of 130.72M. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while AJISF trades at $15.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas AJISF's P/E ratio is 8.56. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to AJISF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is less volatile compared to AJISF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, PCOA has a market cap of 113.40M. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while PCOA trades at $150,000.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas PCOA's P/E ratio is 8.08. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to PCOA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. ULS has daily volatility of 1.94 and PCOA has daily volatility of N/A.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, YSXT has a market cap of 101.53M. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while YSXT trades at $4.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas YSXT's P/E ratio is 27.06. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to YSXT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is less volatile compared to YSXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, CTAGY has a market cap of 97.65M. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while CTAGY trades at $0.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas CTAGY's P/E ratio is 0.24. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to CTAGY's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is less volatile compared to CTAGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, TISI has a market cap of 94.23M. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while TISI trades at $20.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas TISI's P/E ratio is -2.43. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to TISI's ROE of -2.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is less volatile compared to TISI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, WTLLF has a market cap of 84.40M. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while WTLLF trades at $4.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas WTLLF's P/E ratio is 16.11. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to WTLLF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is more volatile compared to WTLLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, ASFH has a market cap of 81.55M. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while ASFH trades at $1.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas ASFH's P/E ratio is 100.00. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to ASFH's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is less volatile compared to ASFH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, PGWFF has a market cap of 78.50M. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while PGWFF trades at $1.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas PGWFF's P/E ratio is 52.00. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to PGWFF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is less volatile compared to PGWFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, DCMDF has a market cap of 69.14M. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while DCMDF trades at $1.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas DCMDF's P/E ratio is 31.25. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to DCMDF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is more volatile compared to DCMDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, RDCPF has a market cap of 63.88M. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while RDCPF trades at $3.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas RDCPF's P/E ratio is 173.50. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to RDCPF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is more volatile compared to RDCPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, CERGF has a market cap of 62.28M. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while CERGF trades at $2.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas CERGF's P/E ratio is 33.33. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to CERGF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is more volatile compared to CERGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, DLHC has a market cap of 59.70M. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while DLHC trades at $4.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas DLHC's P/E ratio is 9.43. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to DLHC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is less volatile compared to DLHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, FLNCF has a market cap of 56.70M. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while FLNCF trades at $0.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas FLNCF's P/E ratio is -12.57. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to FLNCF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is less volatile compared to FLNCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, PMEC has a market cap of 46.13M. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while PMEC trades at $1.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas PMEC's P/E ratio is -8.64. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to PMEC's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is less volatile compared to PMEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, SST has a market cap of 44.47M. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while SST trades at $0.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas SST's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to SST's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is less volatile compared to SST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, ESTTF has a market cap of 42.87M. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while ESTTF trades at $8.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas ESTTF's P/E ratio is 15.96. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to ESTTF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is less volatile compared to ESTTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, SFRX has a market cap of 38.75M. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while SFRX trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas SFRX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to SFRX's ROE of +1.67%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is less volatile compared to SFRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, CRKT has a market cap of 38.36M. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while CRKT trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas CRKT's P/E ratio is -1.11. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to CRKT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is less volatile compared to CRKT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, SGRP has a market cap of 34.71M. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while SGRP trades at $1.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas SGRP's P/E ratio is 2.90. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to SGRP's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is less volatile compared to SGRP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, OMEX has a market cap of 34.70M. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while OMEX trades at $1.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas OMEX's P/E ratio is 17.00. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to OMEX's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is less volatile compared to OMEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, UWHGF has a market cap of 32.41M. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while UWHGF trades at $1.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas UWHGF's P/E ratio is -8.53. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to UWHGF's ROE of -3.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is more volatile compared to UWHGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, FTBGF has a market cap of 29.04M. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while FTBGF trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas FTBGF's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to FTBGF's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is more volatile compared to FTBGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, NTIP has a market cap of 28.27M. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while NTIP trades at $1.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas NTIP's P/E ratio is -9.46. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to NTIP's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is more volatile compared to NTIP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, SRRPF has a market cap of 24.96M. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while SRRPF trades at $2.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas SRRPF's P/E ratio is 6.49. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to SRRPF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is more volatile compared to SRRPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, GNOLF has a market cap of 19.69M. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while GNOLF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas GNOLF's P/E ratio is -1.43. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to GNOLF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is more volatile compared to GNOLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, NSYC has a market cap of 19.63M. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while NSYC trades at $450.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas NSYC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to NSYC's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is more volatile compared to NSYC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, SFHG has a market cap of 15.44M. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while SFHG trades at $0.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas SFHG's P/E ratio is -38.04. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to SFHG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is less volatile compared to SFHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, WHLM has a market cap of 15.01M. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while WHLM trades at $3.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas WHLM's P/E ratio is 25.42. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to WHLM's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is less volatile compared to WHLM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, ELVG has a market cap of 8.25M. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while ELVG trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas ELVG's P/E ratio is 0.66. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to ELVG's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is less volatile compared to ELVG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, GPOX has a market cap of 7.90M. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while GPOX trades at $0.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas GPOX's P/E ratio is -1.93. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to GPOX's ROE of +0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is less volatile compared to GPOX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, ATTO has a market cap of 6.84M. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while ATTO trades at $0.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas ATTO's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to ATTO's ROE of -1.66%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is less volatile compared to ATTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, ADMQ has a market cap of 6.36M. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while ADMQ trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas ADMQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to ADMQ's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is more volatile compared to ADMQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, REPO has a market cap of 4.71M. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while REPO trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas REPO's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to REPO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is less volatile compared to REPO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, SMX has a market cap of 4.36M. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while SMX trades at $1.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas SMX's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to SMX's ROE of -3.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is less volatile compared to SMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, LMTI has a market cap of 2.38M. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while LMTI trades at $0.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas LMTI's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to LMTI's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is less volatile compared to LMTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, BLIS has a market cap of 2.36M. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while BLIS trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas BLIS's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to BLIS's ROE of -2.42%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is more volatile compared to BLIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, LICN has a market cap of 2.34M. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while LICN trades at $3.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas LICN's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to LICN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is less volatile compared to LICN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, CGRW has a market cap of 2.23M. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while CGRW trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas CGRW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to CGRW's ROE of +1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is more volatile compared to CGRW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, OODH has a market cap of 2.15M. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while OODH trades at $0.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas OODH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to OODH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is less volatile compared to OODH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, ANMP has a market cap of 1.48M. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while ANMP trades at $0.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas ANMP's P/E ratio is 2.35. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to ANMP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is more volatile compared to ANMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, SAYFF has a market cap of 1.17M. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while SAYFF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas SAYFF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to SAYFF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is more volatile compared to SAYFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, JFIL has a market cap of 999285.00. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while JFIL trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas JFIL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to JFIL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is more volatile compared to JFIL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, HHGI has a market cap of 675406.00. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while HHGI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas HHGI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to HHGI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is more volatile compared to HHGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, CLRYF has a market cap of 579915.00. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while CLRYF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas CLRYF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to CLRYF's ROE of +1.68%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is less volatile compared to CLRYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, UNDR has a market cap of 479404.00. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while UNDR trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas UNDR's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to UNDR's ROE of +1.37%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is more volatile compared to UNDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, AWAW has a market cap of 435082.00. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while AWAW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas AWAW's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to AWAW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is less volatile compared to AWAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, MTPR has a market cap of 407967.00. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while MTPR trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas MTPR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to MTPR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is less volatile compared to MTPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, DTSL has a market cap of 391291.00. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while DTSL trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas DTSL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to DTSL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is less volatile compared to DTSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, WLDPF has a market cap of 305956.00. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while WLDPF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas WLDPF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to WLDPF's ROE of +1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is less volatile compared to WLDPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, THWWW has a market cap of 252316.00. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while THWWW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas THWWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to THWWW's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is less volatile compared to THWWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, ECOX has a market cap of 219256.00. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while ECOX trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas ECOX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to ECOX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is less volatile compared to ECOX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, OPMG has a market cap of 219237.00. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while OPMG trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas OPMG's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to OPMG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is less volatile compared to OPMG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, IJJP has a market cap of 192545.00. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while IJJP trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas IJJP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to IJJP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is more volatile compared to IJJP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, XCPL has a market cap of 168521.00. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while XCPL trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas XCPL's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to XCPL's ROE of +7.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is more volatile compared to XCPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, DPUI has a market cap of 166592.00. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while DPUI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas DPUI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to DPUI's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is more volatile compared to DPUI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, IMJX has a market cap of 112725.00. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while IMJX trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas IMJX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to IMJX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is less volatile compared to IMJX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, BRYN has a market cap of 107900.00. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while BRYN trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas BRYN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to BRYN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is less volatile compared to BRYN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, INCC has a market cap of 107488.00. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while INCC trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas INCC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to INCC's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is more volatile compared to INCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, CTGL has a market cap of 104407.00. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while CTGL trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas CTGL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to CTGL's ROE of +1.35%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is more volatile compared to CTGL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, NNFC has a market cap of 97837.00. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while NNFC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas NNFC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to NNFC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is less volatile compared to NNFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, UCPC has a market cap of 56164.00. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while UCPC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas UCPC's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to UCPC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is less volatile compared to UCPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, PIFR has a market cap of 52699.00. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while PIFR trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas PIFR's P/E ratio is -0.90. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to PIFR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is less volatile compared to PIFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, GFGU has a market cap of 48460.00. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while GFGU trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas GFGU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to GFGU's ROE of +15.99%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is less volatile compared to GFGU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, BFLD has a market cap of 43750.00. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while BFLD trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas BFLD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to BFLD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is less volatile compared to BFLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, CBMJ has a market cap of 40017.00. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while CBMJ trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas CBMJ's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to CBMJ's ROE of -1.58%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is less volatile compared to CBMJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, SGLS has a market cap of 39548.00. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while SGLS trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas SGLS's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to SGLS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is less volatile compared to SGLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, EVSV has a market cap of 35364.00. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while EVSV trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas EVSV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to EVSV's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is more volatile compared to EVSV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, AXCG has a market cap of 31542.00. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while AXCG trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas AXCG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to AXCG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is less volatile compared to AXCG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, PVNO has a market cap of 26784.00. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while PVNO trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas PVNO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to PVNO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is more volatile compared to PVNO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, OPMZ has a market cap of 26293.00. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while OPMZ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas OPMZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to OPMZ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is less volatile compared to OPMZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, VTON has a market cap of 22058.00. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while VTON trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas VTON's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to VTON's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is less volatile compared to VTON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, STVA has a market cap of 20946.00. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while STVA trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas STVA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to STVA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is more volatile compared to STVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, DPBE has a market cap of 19393.00. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while DPBE trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas DPBE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to DPBE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is less volatile compared to DPBE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, PSCR has a market cap of 17071.00. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while PSCR trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas PSCR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to PSCR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is more volatile compared to PSCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, CMIT has a market cap of 16385.00. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while CMIT trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas CMIT's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to CMIT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is more volatile compared to CMIT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, EIGH has a market cap of 15182.00. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while EIGH trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas EIGH's P/E ratio is 0.10. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to EIGH's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is more volatile compared to EIGH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, ETKR has a market cap of 12449.00. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while ETKR trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas ETKR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to ETKR's ROE of -1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is more volatile compared to ETKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, BWVI has a market cap of 12203.00. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while BWVI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas BWVI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to BWVI's ROE of +470.66%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is more volatile compared to BWVI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, MHHC has a market cap of 10827.00. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while MHHC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas MHHC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to MHHC's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is more volatile compared to MHHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, APRO has a market cap of 8592.00. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while APRO trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas APRO's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to APRO's ROE of +5.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is more volatile compared to APRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, VTTH has a market cap of 8000.00. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while VTTH trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas VTTH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to VTTH's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is less volatile compared to VTTH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, GPAK has a market cap of 7674.00. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while GPAK trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas GPAK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to GPAK's ROE of -1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is more volatile compared to GPAK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, EOSC has a market cap of 6839.00. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while EOSC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas EOSC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to EOSC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is less volatile compared to EOSC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, ISVG has a market cap of 6170.00. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while ISVG trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas ISVG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to ISVG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is less volatile compared to ISVG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, PPMT has a market cap of 5430.00. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while PPMT trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas PPMT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to PPMT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is less volatile compared to PPMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, FIFG has a market cap of 5412.00. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while FIFG trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas FIFG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to FIFG's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is less volatile compared to FIFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, OLNK has a market cap of 3731.00. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while OLNK trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas OLNK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to OLNK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is less volatile compared to OLNK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, SSRC has a market cap of 3364.00. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while SSRC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas SSRC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to SSRC's ROE of +1.57%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is less volatile compared to SSRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, ISON has a market cap of 2800.00. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while ISON trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas ISON's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to ISON's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is more volatile compared to ISON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, VOYT has a market cap of 2563.00. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while VOYT trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas VOYT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to VOYT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is less volatile compared to VOYT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, TEKI has a market cap of 2521.00. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while TEKI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas TEKI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to TEKI's ROE of -3.85%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is less volatile compared to TEKI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, AOOO has a market cap of 2484.00. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while AOOO trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas AOOO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to AOOO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is more volatile compared to AOOO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, BSGC has a market cap of 1440.00. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while BSGC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas BSGC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to BSGC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is less volatile compared to BSGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, THPHF has a market cap of 984.00. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while THPHF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas THPHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to THPHF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is more volatile compared to THPHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, MENI has a market cap of 918.00. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while MENI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas MENI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to MENI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is less volatile compared to MENI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, CFCC has a market cap of 810.00. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while CFCC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas CFCC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to CFCC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is more volatile compared to CFCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, FRPC has a market cap of 667.00. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while FRPC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas FRPC's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to FRPC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is less volatile compared to FRPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, XREG has a market cap of 439.00. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while XREG trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas XREG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to XREG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is less volatile compared to XREG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, ALCN has a market cap of 400.00. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while ALCN trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas ALCN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to ALCN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is more volatile compared to ALCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, NXPS has a market cap of 324.00. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while NXPS trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas NXPS's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to NXPS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is more volatile compared to NXPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, NSEO has a market cap of 269.00. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while NSEO trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas NSEO's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to NSEO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is more volatile compared to NSEO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, IEXA has a market cap of 222.00. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while IEXA trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas IEXA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to IEXA's ROE of -5.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is more volatile compared to IEXA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, EMNC has a market cap of 149.00. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while EMNC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas EMNC's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to EMNC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is more volatile compared to EMNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, OPUS has a market cap of 110.00. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while OPUS trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas OPUS's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to OPUS's ROE of +12.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is more volatile compared to OPUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, NXRA has a market cap of 38.00. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while NXRA trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas NXRA's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to NXRA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is more volatile compared to NXRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, CLBN has a market cap of 37.00. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while CLBN trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas CLBN's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to CLBN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is more volatile compared to CLBN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, OGNT has a market cap of 29.00. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while OGNT trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas OGNT's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to OGNT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is more volatile compared to OGNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, AZIL has a market cap of 8.00. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while AZIL trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas AZIL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to AZIL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is more volatile compared to AZIL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, CXIA has a market cap of 8.00. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while CXIA trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas CXIA's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to CXIA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is more volatile compared to CXIA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, APRM comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while APRM trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas APRM's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to APRM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is more volatile compared to APRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, RRD comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while RRD trades at $10.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas RRD's P/E ratio is 225.83. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to RRD's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is more volatile compared to RRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, HMSVY comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while HMSVY trades at $27.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas HMSVY's P/E ratio is 28.73. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to HMSVY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is more volatile compared to HMSVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, CURZ comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while CURZ trades at $1.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas CURZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to CURZ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is less volatile compared to CURZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, PAE comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while PAE trades at $10.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas PAE's P/E ratio is 19.74. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to PAE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is more volatile compared to PAE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, PMKY comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while PMKY trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas PMKY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to PMKY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is less volatile compared to PMKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, EDZR comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while EDZR trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas EDZR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to EDZR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is less volatile compared to EDZR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, ALJJ comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while ALJJ trades at $1.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas ALJJ's P/E ratio is 1.06. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to ALJJ's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is more volatile compared to ALJJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, CESF comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while CESF trades at $0.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas CESF's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to CESF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is more volatile compared to CESF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, CWPS comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while CWPS trades at $28.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas CWPS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to CWPS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is less volatile compared to CWPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, PAEWW comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while PAEWW trades at $2.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas PAEWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to PAEWW's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is more volatile compared to PAEWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, MNII comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while MNII trades at $0.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas MNII's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to MNII's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is less volatile compared to MNII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.

ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.06B. In comparison, HMSVF comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $70.14, while HMSVF trades at $14.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.00, whereas HMSVF's P/E ratio is 30.63. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.41%, compared to HMSVF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is more volatile compared to HMSVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.