UL Solutions Inc.
UL Solutions Inc. ULS Peers
See (ULS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Specialty Business Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ULS | $71.48 | +0.69% | 14.3B | 42.80 | $1.67 | +0.88% |
| CTAS | $226.50 | +0.78% | 91.5B | 52.67 | $4.30 | +0.94% |
| TRI | $198.65 | +1.15% | 89.5B | 41.82 | $4.75 | +1.15% |
| RBA | $105.25 | +1.32% | 19.5B | 52.10 | $2.02 | +1.10% |
| GPN | $75.57 | -0.37% | 18.4B | 12.23 | $6.18 | +1.32% |
| BIPI | $16.22 | -0.77% | 12.9B | N/A | N/A | +5.91% |
| RTO | $23.78 | +0.40% | 12B | 28.99 | $0.82 | +2.47% |
| ARMK | $40.51 | +0.85% | 10.6B | 31.16 | $1.30 | +1.01% |
| IAA | $39.89 | -0.10% | 5.3B | 18.55 | $2.15 | N/A |
| MMS | $72.47 | +0.51% | 4.1B | 14.52 | $4.99 | +1.65% |
Stock Comparison
ULS vs CTAS Comparison
ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.3B. In comparison, CTAS has a market cap of 91.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $71.48, while CTAS trades at $226.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.80, whereas CTAS's P/E ratio is 52.67. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.38%, compared to CTAS's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is more volatile compared to CTAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.
ULS vs TRI Comparison
ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.3B. In comparison, TRI has a market cap of 89.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $71.48, while TRI trades at $198.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.80, whereas TRI's P/E ratio is 41.82. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.38%, compared to TRI's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is more volatile compared to TRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.
ULS vs RBA Comparison
ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.3B. In comparison, RBA has a market cap of 19.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $71.48, while RBA trades at $105.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.80, whereas RBA's P/E ratio is 52.10. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.38%, compared to RBA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is more volatile compared to RBA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.
ULS vs GPN Comparison
ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.3B. In comparison, GPN has a market cap of 18.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $71.48, while GPN trades at $75.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.80, whereas GPN's P/E ratio is 12.23. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.38%, compared to GPN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is more volatile compared to GPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.
ULS vs BIPI Comparison
ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.3B. In comparison, BIPI has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $71.48, while BIPI trades at $16.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.80, whereas BIPI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.38%, compared to BIPI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is more volatile compared to BIPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.
ULS vs RTO Comparison
ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.3B. In comparison, RTO has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $71.48, while RTO trades at $23.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.80, whereas RTO's P/E ratio is 28.99. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.38%, compared to RTO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is more volatile compared to RTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.
ULS vs ARMK Comparison
ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.3B. In comparison, ARMK has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $71.48, while ARMK trades at $40.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.80, whereas ARMK's P/E ratio is 31.16. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.38%, compared to ARMK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is more volatile compared to ARMK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.
ULS vs IAA Comparison
ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.3B. In comparison, IAA has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $71.48, while IAA trades at $39.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.80, whereas IAA's P/E ratio is 18.55. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.38%, compared to IAA's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is less volatile compared to IAA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.
ULS vs MMS Comparison
ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.3B. In comparison, MMS has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $71.48, while MMS trades at $72.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.80, whereas MMS's P/E ratio is 14.52. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.38%, compared to MMS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is more volatile compared to MMS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.
ULS vs CBZ Comparison
ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.3B. In comparison, CBZ has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $71.48, while CBZ trades at $72.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.80, whereas CBZ's P/E ratio is 63.33. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.38%, compared to CBZ's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is more volatile compared to CBZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.
ULS vs UNF Comparison
ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.3B. In comparison, UNF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $71.48, while UNF trades at $188.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.80, whereas UNF's P/E ratio is 23.45. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.38%, compared to UNF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is more volatile compared to UNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.
ULS vs ABM Comparison
ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.3B. In comparison, ABM has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $71.48, while ABM trades at $52.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.80, whereas ABM's P/E ratio is 41.44. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.38%, compared to ABM's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is more volatile compared to ABM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.
ULS vs FA Comparison
ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.3B. In comparison, FA has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $71.48, while FA trades at $17.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.80, whereas FA's P/E ratio is -17.82. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.38%, compared to FA's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is less volatile compared to FA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.
ULS vs LZ Comparison
ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.3B. In comparison, LZ has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $71.48, while LZ trades at $9.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.80, whereas LZ's P/E ratio is 57.06. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.38%, compared to LZ's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is less volatile compared to LZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.
ULS vs BV Comparison
ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.3B. In comparison, BV has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $71.48, while BV trades at $15.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.80, whereas BV's P/E ratio is -779.00. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.38%, compared to BV's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is more volatile compared to BV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.
ULS vs VVI Comparison
ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.3B. In comparison, VVI has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $71.48, while VVI trades at $42.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.80, whereas VVI's P/E ratio is 41.68. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.38%, compared to VVI's ROE of +1.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is less volatile compared to VVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.
ULS vs SP Comparison
ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.3B. In comparison, SP has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $71.48, while SP trades at $53.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.80, whereas SP's P/E ratio is 35.29. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.38%, compared to SP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is more volatile compared to SP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.
ULS vs TDCX Comparison
ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.3B. In comparison, TDCX has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $71.48, while TDCX trades at $7.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.80, whereas TDCX's P/E ratio is 11.69. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.38%, compared to TDCX's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is more volatile compared to TDCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.
ULS vs PRSU Comparison
ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.3B. In comparison, PRSU has a market cap of 787.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $71.48, while PRSU trades at $27.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.80, whereas PRSU's P/E ratio is -14.29. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.38%, compared to PRSU's ROE of +2.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is less volatile compared to PRSU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.
ULS vs TH Comparison
ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.3B. In comparison, TH has a market cap of 726.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $71.48, while TH trades at $7.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.80, whereas TH's P/E ratio is 17.00. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.38%, compared to TH's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is less volatile compared to TH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.
ULS vs CASS Comparison
ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.3B. In comparison, CASS has a market cap of 565.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $71.48, while CASS trades at $42.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.80, whereas CASS's P/E ratio is 28.01. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.38%, compared to CASS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is more volatile compared to CASS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.
ULS vs KODK Comparison
ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.3B. In comparison, KODK has a market cap of 458M. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $71.48, while KODK trades at $5.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.80, whereas KODK's P/E ratio is 11.81. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.38%, compared to KODK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is less volatile compared to KODK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.
ULS vs ACTG Comparison
ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.3B. In comparison, ACTG has a market cap of 358.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $71.48, while ACTG trades at $3.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.80, whereas ACTG's P/E ratio is -33.91. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.38%, compared to ACTG's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is less volatile compared to ACTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.
ULS vs SPIR Comparison
ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.3B. In comparison, SPIR has a market cap of 322M. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $71.48, while SPIR trades at $10.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.80, whereas SPIR's P/E ratio is -2.70. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.38%, compared to SPIR's ROE of -6.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is less volatile compared to SPIR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.
ULS vs QUAD Comparison
ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.3B. In comparison, QUAD has a market cap of 294.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $71.48, while QUAD trades at $5.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.80, whereas QUAD's P/E ratio is -16.18. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.38%, compared to QUAD's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is less volatile compared to QUAD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.
ULS vs CVEO Comparison
ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.3B. In comparison, CVEO has a market cap of 293.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $71.48, while CVEO trades at $21.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.80, whereas CVEO's P/E ratio is -13.98. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.38%, compared to CVEO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is more volatile compared to CVEO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.
ULS vs RHLD Comparison
ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.3B. In comparison, RHLD has a market cap of 293.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $71.48, while RHLD trades at $34.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.80, whereas RHLD's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.38%, compared to RHLD's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is less volatile compared to RHLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.
ULS vs PFMT Comparison
ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.3B. In comparison, PFMT has a market cap of 278.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $71.48, while PFMT trades at $3.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.80, whereas PFMT's P/E ratio is -35.60. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.38%, compared to PFMT's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is less volatile compared to PFMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.
ULS vs PFSW Comparison
ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.3B. In comparison, PFSW has a market cap of 170.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $71.48, while PFSW trades at $7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.80, whereas PFSW's P/E ratio is -17.43. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.38%, compared to PFSW's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is more volatile compared to PFSW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.
ULS vs ARC Comparison
ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.3B. In comparison, ARC has a market cap of 146.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $71.48, while ARC trades at $3.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.80, whereas ARC's P/E ratio is 30.82. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.38%, compared to ARC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is more volatile compared to ARC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.
ULS vs YSXT Comparison
ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.3B. In comparison, YSXT has a market cap of 132.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $71.48, while YSXT trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.80, whereas YSXT's P/E ratio is 35.29. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.38%, compared to YSXT's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is less volatile compared to YSXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.
ULS vs TISI Comparison
ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.3B. In comparison, TISI has a market cap of 81.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $71.48, while TISI trades at $18.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.80, whereas TISI's P/E ratio is -1.60. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.38%, compared to TISI's ROE of -11.58%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is less volatile compared to TISI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.
ULS vs DLHC Comparison
ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.3B. In comparison, DLHC has a market cap of 72.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $71.48, while DLHC trades at $5.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.80, whereas DLHC's P/E ratio is 13.25. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.38%, compared to DLHC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is more volatile compared to DLHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.
ULS vs PMEC Comparison
ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.3B. In comparison, PMEC has a market cap of 47.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $71.48, while PMEC trades at $1.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.80, whereas PMEC's P/E ratio is -8.79. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.38%, compared to PMEC's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is less volatile compared to PMEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.
ULS vs SST Comparison
ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.3B. In comparison, SST has a market cap of 33.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $71.48, while SST trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.80, whereas SST's P/E ratio is -0.32. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.38%, compared to SST's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is less volatile compared to SST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.
ULS vs NTIP Comparison
ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.3B. In comparison, NTIP has a market cap of 28.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $71.48, while NTIP trades at $1.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.80, whereas NTIP's P/E ratio is -11.41. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.38%, compared to NTIP's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is more volatile compared to NTIP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.
ULS vs OMEX Comparison
ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.3B. In comparison, OMEX has a market cap of 24.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $71.48, while OMEX trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.80, whereas OMEX's P/E ratio is 3.01. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.38%, compared to OMEX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is less volatile compared to OMEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.
ULS vs SGRP Comparison
ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.3B. In comparison, SGRP has a market cap of 24.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $71.48, while SGRP trades at $1.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.80, whereas SGRP's P/E ratio is -7.96. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.38%, compared to SGRP's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is more volatile compared to SGRP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.
ULS vs SFHG Comparison
ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.3B. In comparison, SFHG has a market cap of 17M. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $71.48, while SFHG trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.80, whereas SFHG's P/E ratio is -41.80. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.38%, compared to SFHG's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is less volatile compared to SFHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.
ULS vs WHLM Comparison
ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.3B. In comparison, WHLM has a market cap of 16M. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $71.48, while WHLM trades at $3.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.80, whereas WHLM's P/E ratio is 25.08. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.38%, compared to WHLM's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is more volatile compared to WHLM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.
ULS vs ATTO Comparison
ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.3B. In comparison, ATTO has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $71.48, while ATTO trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.80, whereas ATTO's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.38%, compared to ATTO's ROE of -1.66%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is less volatile compared to ATTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.
ULS vs SMX Comparison
ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.3B. In comparison, SMX has a market cap of 5.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $71.48, while SMX trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.80, whereas SMX's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.38%, compared to SMX's ROE of -3.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is less volatile compared to SMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.
ULS vs LICN Comparison
ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.3B. In comparison, LICN has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $71.48, while LICN trades at $4.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.80, whereas LICN's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.38%, compared to LICN's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is less volatile compared to LICN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.
ULS vs THWWW Comparison
ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.3B. In comparison, THWWW has a market cap of 252.3K. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $71.48, while THWWW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.80, whereas THWWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.38%, compared to THWWW's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is less volatile compared to THWWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.
ULS vs GPAK Comparison
ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.3B. In comparison, GPAK has a market cap of 7.7K. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $71.48, while GPAK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.80, whereas GPAK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.38%, compared to GPAK's ROE of -1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is more volatile compared to GPAK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.
ULS vs ALJJ Comparison
ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.3B. In comparison, ALJJ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $71.48, while ALJJ trades at $1.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.80, whereas ALJJ's P/E ratio is 1.06. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.38%, compared to ALJJ's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is more volatile compared to ALJJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.
ULS vs RRD Comparison
ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.3B. In comparison, RRD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $71.48, while RRD trades at $10.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.80, whereas RRD's P/E ratio is 225.83. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.38%, compared to RRD's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is more volatile compared to RRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.
ULS vs PAE Comparison
ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.3B. In comparison, PAE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $71.48, while PAE trades at $10.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.80, whereas PAE's P/E ratio is 19.74. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.38%, compared to PAE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is more volatile compared to PAE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.
ULS vs PAEWW Comparison
ULS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ULS stands at 14.3B. In comparison, PAEWW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ULS is priced at $71.48, while PAEWW trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ULS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.80, whereas PAEWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ULS's ROE is +0.38%, compared to PAEWW's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ULS is more volatile compared to PAEWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ULS.