Ubiquiti Inc.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 27B. In comparison, CSCO has a market cap of 272.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $446.46, while CSCO trades at $68.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 49.15, whereas CSCO's P/E ratio is 28.04. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to CSCO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is more volatile compared to CSCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check CSCO's competition here

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 27B. In comparison, MSI has a market cap of 71.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $446.46, while MSI trades at $428.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 49.15, whereas MSI's P/E ratio is 35.75. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to MSI's ROE of +1.50%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is more volatile compared to MSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check MSI's competition here

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 27B. In comparison, HPE has a market cap of 27.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $446.46, while HPE trades at $20.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 49.15, whereas HPE's P/E ratio is 19.92. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to HPE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is more volatile compared to HPE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check HPE's competition here

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 27B. In comparison, ERIC has a market cap of 25.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $446.46, while ERIC trades at $7.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 49.15, whereas ERIC's P/E ratio is 13.62. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to ERIC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is more volatile compared to ERIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check ERIC's competition here

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 27B. In comparison, NOK has a market cap of 23.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $446.46, while NOK trades at $4.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 49.15, whereas NOK's P/E ratio is 22.87. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to NOK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is more volatile compared to NOK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check NOK's competition here

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 27B. In comparison, ASTS has a market cap of 19B. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $446.46, while ASTS trades at $54.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 49.15, whereas ASTS's P/E ratio is -27.44. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to ASTS's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to ASTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check ASTS's competition here

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 27B. In comparison, CRDO has a market cap of 17.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $446.46, while CRDO trades at $101.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 49.15, whereas CRDO's P/E ratio is 349.03. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to CRDO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to CRDO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check CRDO's competition here

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 27B. In comparison, ZBRA has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $446.46, while ZBRA trades at $335.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 49.15, whereas ZBRA's P/E ratio is 31.76. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to ZBRA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to ZBRA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check ZBRA's competition here

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 27B. In comparison, JNPR has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $446.46, while JNPR trades at $39.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 49.15, whereas JNPR's P/E ratio is 38.05. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to JNPR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is more volatile compared to JNPR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check JNPR's competition here

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 27B. In comparison, CIEN has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $446.46, while CIEN trades at $88.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 49.15, whereas CIEN's P/E ratio is 121.34. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to CIEN's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to CIEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check CIEN's competition here

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 27B. In comparison, SATS has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $446.46, while SATS trades at $29.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 49.15, whereas SATS's P/E ratio is -39.56. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to SATS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to SATS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check SATS's competition here

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 27B. In comparison, LITE has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $446.46, while LITE trades at $104.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 49.15, whereas LITE's P/E ratio is -16.18. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to LITE's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to LITE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check LITE's competition here

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 27B. In comparison, BDC has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $446.46, while BDC trades at $128.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 49.15, whereas BDC's P/E ratio is 24.81. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to BDC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is more volatile compared to BDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check BDC's competition here

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 27B. In comparison, MAXR has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $446.46, while MAXR trades at $52.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 49.15, whereas MAXR's P/E ratio is -26.10. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to MAXR's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is more volatile compared to MAXR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check MAXR's competition here

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 27B. In comparison, PI has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $446.46, while PI trades at $124.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 49.15, whereas PI's P/E ratio is -2072.33. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to PI's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to PI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check PI's competition here

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 27B. In comparison, EXTR has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $446.46, while EXTR trades at $17.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 49.15, whereas EXTR's P/E ratio is -43.54. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to EXTR's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is more volatile compared to EXTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check EXTR's competition here

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 27B. In comparison, VIAV has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $446.46, while VIAV trades at $10.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 49.15, whereas VIAV's P/E ratio is 508.75. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to VIAV's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is more volatile compared to VIAV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check VIAV's competition here

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 27B. In comparison, VSAT has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $446.46, while VSAT trades at $14.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 49.15, whereas VSAT's P/E ratio is -3.28. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to VSAT's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to VSAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check VSAT's competition here

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 27B. In comparison, KN has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $446.46, while KN trades at $20.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 49.15, whereas KN's P/E ratio is 75.56. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to KN's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to KN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check KN's competition here

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 27B. In comparison, COMM has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $446.46, while COMM trades at $7.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 49.15, whereas COMM's P/E ratio is -44.33. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to COMM's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to COMM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check COMM's competition here

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 27B. In comparison, INFN has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $446.46, while INFN trades at $6.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 49.15, whereas INFN's P/E ratio is -10.38. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to INFN's ROE of -1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is more volatile compared to INFN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check INFN's competition here

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 27B. In comparison, DGII has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $446.46, while DGII trades at $33.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 49.15, whereas DGII's P/E ratio is 29.68. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to DGII's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to DGII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check DGII's competition here

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 27B. In comparison, SWIR has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $446.46, while SWIR trades at $30.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 49.15, whereas SWIR's P/E ratio is -22.82. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to SWIR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UI is more volatile compared to SWIR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check SWIR's competition here

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 27B. In comparison, HLIT has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $446.46, while HLIT trades at $9.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 49.15, whereas HLIT's P/E ratio is 20.00. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to HLIT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is more volatile compared to HLIT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check HLIT's competition here

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 27B. In comparison, ITRN has a market cap of 808.3M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $446.46, while ITRN trades at $40.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 49.15, whereas ITRN's P/E ratio is 14.69. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to ITRN's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to ITRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check ITRN's competition here

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 27B. In comparison, POLY has a market cap of 790.5M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $446.46, while POLY trades at $39.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 49.15, whereas POLY's P/E ratio is 75.13. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to POLY's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is more volatile compared to POLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check POLY's competition here

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 27B. In comparison, NTGR has a market cap of 742M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $446.46, while NTGR trades at $25.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 49.15, whereas NTGR's P/E ratio is 30.69. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to NTGR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to NTGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check NTGR's competition here

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 27B. In comparison, ADTN has a market cap of 738.7M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $446.46, while ADTN trades at $9.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 49.15, whereas ADTN's P/E ratio is -5.73. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to ADTN's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is more volatile compared to ADTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check ADTN's competition here

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 27B. In comparison, CLFD has a market cap of 612.9M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $446.46, while CLFD trades at $44.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 49.15, whereas CLFD's P/E ratio is -316.50. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to CLFD's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is more volatile compared to CLFD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check CLFD's competition here

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 27B. In comparison, AIOT has a market cap of 609.5M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $446.46, while AIOT trades at $4.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 49.15, whereas AIOT's P/E ratio is -10.63. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to AIOT's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to AIOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check AIOT's competition here

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 27B. In comparison, PWFL has a market cap of 490.6M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $446.46, while PWFL trades at $4.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 49.15, whereas PWFL's P/E ratio is -9.33. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to PWFL's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to PWFL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check PWFL's competition here

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 27B. In comparison, GILT has a market cap of 441.3M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $446.46, while GILT trades at $7.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 49.15, whereas GILT's P/E ratio is 32.25. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to GILT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to GILT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check GILT's competition here

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 27B. In comparison, TSAT has a market cap of 383.2M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $446.46, while TSAT trades at $26.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 49.15, whereas TSAT's P/E ratio is -5.65. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to TSAT's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to TSAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check TSAT's competition here

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 27B. In comparison, ONDS has a market cap of 371.4M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $446.46, while ONDS trades at $2.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 49.15, whereas ONDS's P/E ratio is -3.60. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to ONDS's ROE of -2.26%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to ONDS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check ONDS's competition here

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 27B. In comparison, AUDC has a market cap of 310.7M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $446.46, while AUDC trades at $10.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 49.15, whereas AUDC's P/E ratio is 18.70. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to AUDC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to AUDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check AUDC's competition here

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 27B. In comparison, ITI has a market cap of 309.5M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $446.46, while ITI trades at $7.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 49.15, whereas ITI's P/E ratio is 239.67. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to ITI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is more volatile compared to ITI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check ITI's competition here

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 27B. In comparison, AVNW has a market cap of 295.3M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $446.46, while AVNW trades at $23.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 49.15, whereas AVNW's P/E ratio is -122.05. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to AVNW's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is more volatile compared to AVNW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check AVNW's competition here

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 27B. In comparison, FEIM has a market cap of 272.2M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $446.46, while FEIM trades at $27.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 49.15, whereas FEIM's P/E ratio is 11.37. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to FEIM's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to FEIM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check FEIM's competition here

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 27B. In comparison, SATX has a market cap of 256.5M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $446.46, while SATX trades at $2.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 49.15, whereas SATX's P/E ratio is -5.69. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to SATX's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is more volatile compared to SATX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check SATX's competition here

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 27B. In comparison, CRNT has a market cap of 203M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $446.46, while CRNT trades at $2.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 49.15, whereas CRNT's P/E ratio is 8.79. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to CRNT's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to CRNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check CRNT's competition here

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 27B. In comparison, BKTI has a market cap of 139.7M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $446.46, while BKTI trades at $38.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 49.15, whereas BKTI's P/E ratio is 14.57. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to BKTI's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to BKTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check BKTI's competition here

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 27B. In comparison, PCTI has a market cap of 135.3M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $446.46, while PCTI trades at $6.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 49.15, whereas PCTI's P/E ratio is 30.39. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to PCTI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is more volatile compared to PCTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check PCTI's competition here

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 27B. In comparison, LTRX has a market cap of 124.4M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $446.46, while LTRX trades at $3.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 49.15, whereas LTRX's P/E ratio is -14.55. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to LTRX's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to LTRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check LTRX's competition here

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 27B. In comparison, INSG has a market cap of 110.5M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $446.46, while INSG trades at $7.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 49.15, whereas INSG's P/E ratio is -7.22. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to INSG's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to INSG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check INSG's competition here

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 27B. In comparison, KVHI has a market cap of 103.5M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $446.46, while KVHI trades at $5.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 49.15, whereas KVHI's P/E ratio is -10.56. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to KVHI's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to KVHI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check KVHI's competition here

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 27B. In comparison, SILC has a market cap of 90.5M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $446.46, while SILC trades at $15.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 49.15, whereas SILC's P/E ratio is -7.16. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to SILC's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to SILC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check SILC's competition here

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 27B. In comparison, TESS has a market cap of 83.3M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $446.46, while TESS trades at $8.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 49.15, whereas TESS's P/E ratio is -19.13. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to TESS's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is more volatile compared to TESS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check TESS's competition here

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 27B. In comparison, JCS has a market cap of 77M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $446.46, while JCS trades at $8.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 49.15, whereas JCS's P/E ratio is 6.60. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to JCS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to JCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check JCS's competition here

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 27B. In comparison, CMTL has a market cap of 66.7M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $446.46, while CMTL trades at $2.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 49.15, whereas CMTL's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to CMTL's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to CMTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check CMTL's competition here

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 27B. In comparison, AMPG has a market cap of 63.2M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $446.46, while AMPG trades at $3.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 49.15, whereas AMPG's P/E ratio is -4.45. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to AMPG's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to AMPG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check AMPG's competition here

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 27B. In comparison, AIRG has a market cap of 59.4M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $446.46, while AIRG trades at $5.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 49.15, whereas AIRG's P/E ratio is -7.30. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to AIRG's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to AIRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check AIRG's competition here

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 27B. In comparison, AMPGW has a market cap of 52.1M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $446.46, while AMPGW trades at $0.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 49.15, whereas AMPGW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to AMPGW's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to AMPGW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check AMPGW's competition here

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 27B. In comparison, FKWL has a market cap of 46.9M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $446.46, while FKWL trades at $3.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 49.15, whereas FKWL's P/E ratio is -28.43. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to FKWL's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is more volatile compared to FKWL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check FKWL's competition here

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 27B. In comparison, WTT has a market cap of 45.3M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $446.46, while WTT trades at $2.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 49.15, whereas WTT's P/E ratio is -19.32. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to WTT's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is more volatile compared to WTT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check WTT's competition here

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 27B. In comparison, OCC has a market cap of 41M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $446.46, while OCC trades at $4.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 49.15, whereas OCC's P/E ratio is -13.11. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to OCC's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to OCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check OCC's competition here

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 27B. In comparison, SYTAW has a market cap of 39.5M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $446.46, while SYTAW trades at $0.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 49.15, whereas SYTAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to SYTAW's ROE of -5.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to SYTAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check SYTAW's competition here

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 27B. In comparison, SYTA has a market cap of 33.3M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $446.46, while SYTA trades at $3.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 49.15, whereas SYTA's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to SYTA's ROE of -5.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to SYTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check SYTA's competition here

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 27B. In comparison, BOSC has a market cap of 29.8M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $446.46, while BOSC trades at $5.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 49.15, whereas BOSC's P/E ratio is 10.48. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to BOSC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to BOSC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check BOSC's competition here

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 27B. In comparison, CMBM has a market cap of 26.5M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $446.46, while CMBM trades at $0.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 49.15, whereas CMBM's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to CMBM's ROE of -1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to CMBM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check CMBM's competition here

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 27B. In comparison, MOB has a market cap of 26.5M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $446.46, while MOB trades at $3.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 49.15, whereas MOB's P/E ratio is -2.68. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to MOB's ROE of -1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to MOB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check MOB's competition here

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 27B. In comparison, UTSI has a market cap of 23.8M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $446.46, while UTSI trades at $2.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 49.15, whereas UTSI's P/E ratio is -5.23. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to UTSI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is more volatile compared to UTSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check UTSI's competition here

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 27B. In comparison, MINM has a market cap of 13.4M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $446.46, while MINM trades at $3.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 49.15, whereas MINM's P/E ratio is -13.88. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to MINM's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to MINM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check MINM's competition here

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 27B. In comparison, IOTR has a market cap of 13.2M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $446.46, while IOTR trades at $0.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 49.15, whereas IOTR's P/E ratio is -51.49. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to IOTR's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to IOTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check IOTR's competition here

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 27B. In comparison, SONM has a market cap of 13M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $446.46, while SONM trades at $0.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 49.15, whereas SONM's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to SONM's ROE of -4.65%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to SONM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check SONM's competition here

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 27B. In comparison, SYNX has a market cap of 12M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $446.46, while SYNX trades at $1.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 49.15, whereas SYNX's P/E ratio is -4.02. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to SYNX's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to SYNX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check SYNX's competition here

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 27B. In comparison, CLRO has a market cap of 10M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $446.46, while CLRO trades at $5.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 49.15, whereas CLRO's P/E ratio is -0.96. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to CLRO's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to CLRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check CLRO's competition here

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 27B. In comparison, MITQ has a market cap of 7.5M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $446.46, while MITQ trades at $0.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 49.15, whereas MITQ's P/E ratio is -6.28. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to MITQ's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to MITQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check MITQ's competition here

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 27B. In comparison, BOXL has a market cap of 5.8M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $446.46, while BOXL trades at $2.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 49.15, whereas BOXL's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to BOXL's ROE of -1.71%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to BOXL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check BOXL's competition here

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 27B. In comparison, AKTS has a market cap of 5.7M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $446.46, while AKTS trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 49.15, whereas AKTS's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to AKTS's ROE of +23.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to AKTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check AKTS's competition here

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 27B. In comparison, VISL has a market cap of 5.7M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $446.46, while VISL trades at $2.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 49.15, whereas VISL's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to VISL's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to VISL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check VISL's competition here

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 27B. In comparison, ASNS has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $446.46, while ASNS trades at $0.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 49.15, whereas ASNS's P/E ratio is -0.93. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to ASNS's ROE of -1.78%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to ASNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check ASNS's competition here

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 27B. In comparison, CASA has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $446.46, while CASA trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 49.15, whereas CASA's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to CASA's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to CASA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check CASA's competition here

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 27B. In comparison, MOBBW has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $446.46, while MOBBW trades at $0.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 49.15, whereas MOBBW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to MOBBW's ROE of -1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is more volatile compared to MOBBW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check MOBBW's competition here

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 27B. In comparison, MYNA has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $446.46, while MYNA trades at $0.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 49.15, whereas MYNA's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to MYNA's ROE of +8.70%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to MYNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check MYNA's competition here

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 27B. In comparison, DZSI has a market cap of 810.7K. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $446.46, while DZSI trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 49.15, whereas DZSI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to DZSI's ROE of -2.37%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to DZSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check DZSI's competition here

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 27B. In comparison, EXFO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $446.46, while EXFO trades at $6.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 49.15, whereas EXFO's P/E ratio is -56.31. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to EXFO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is more volatile compared to EXFO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check EXFO's competition here

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 27B. In comparison, ZXZZT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $446.46, while ZXZZT trades at $12.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 49.15, whereas ZXZZT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to ZXZZT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UI is more volatile compared to ZXZZT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check ZXZZT's competition here

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 27B. In comparison, BDR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $446.46, while BDR trades at $0.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 49.15, whereas BDR's P/E ratio is -5.87. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to BDR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to BDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check BDR's competition here

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 27B. In comparison, ORBC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $446.46, while ORBC trades at $11.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 49.15, whereas ORBC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to ORBC's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is more volatile compared to ORBC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check ORBC's competition here

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 27B. In comparison, SATX-WTA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $446.46, while SATX-WTA trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 49.15, whereas SATX-WTA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to SATX-WTA's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to SATX-WTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check SATX-WTA's competition here

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 27B. In comparison, VCRA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $446.46, while VCRA trades at $79.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 49.15, whereas VCRA's P/E ratio is -316.52. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to VCRA's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is more volatile compared to VCRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check VCRA's competition here