Ubiquiti Inc.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, CSCO has a market cap of 235.91B. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while CSCO trades at $59.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas CSCO's P/E ratio is 26.01. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to CSCO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is more volatile compared to CSCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, MSI has a market cap of 67.64B. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while MSI trades at $405.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas MSI's P/E ratio is 33.79. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to MSI's ROE of +1.50%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to MSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, ERIXF has a market cap of 27.98B. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while ERIXF trades at $8.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas ERIXF's P/E ratio is 167.80. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to ERIXF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is more volatile compared to ERIXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, ERIC has a market cap of 27.35B. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while ERIC trades at $8.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas ERIC's P/E ratio is 165.00. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to ERIC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is more volatile compared to ERIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, NOK has a market cap of 26.98B. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while NOK trades at $5.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas NOK's P/E ratio is 20.02. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to NOK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is more volatile compared to NOK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, NOKBF has a market cap of 25.89B. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while NOKBF trades at $4.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas NOKBF's P/E ratio is 19.80. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to NOKBF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is more volatile compared to NOKBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, HPE has a market cap of 21.93B. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while HPE trades at $16.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas HPE's P/E ratio is 8.03. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to HPE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to HPE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, ZTCOF has a market cap of 19.86B. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while ZTCOF trades at $3.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas ZTCOF's P/E ratio is 13.04. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to ZTCOF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is more volatile compared to ZTCOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, ZBRA has a market cap of 12.75B. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while ZBRA trades at $250.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas ZBRA's P/E ratio is 24.60. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to ZBRA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to ZBRA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, JNPR has a market cap of 12.24B. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while JNPR trades at $36.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas JNPR's P/E ratio is 34.87. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to JNPR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is more volatile compared to JNPR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, CIEN has a market cap of 10.36B. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while CIEN trades at $72.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas CIEN's P/E ratio is 132.53. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to CIEN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to CIEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, CRDO has a market cap of 8.27B. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while CRDO trades at $48.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas CRDO's P/E ratio is 1623.00. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to CRDO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to CRDO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, ASTS has a market cap of 8.11B. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while ASTS trades at $24.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas ASTS's P/E ratio is -12.76. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to ASTS's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to ASTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, SATS has a market cap of 6.84B. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while SATS trades at $23.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas SATS's P/E ratio is -54.27. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to SATS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to SATS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, AACAY has a market cap of 5.75B. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while AACAY trades at $4.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas AACAY's P/E ratio is 23.17. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to AACAY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to AACAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, AACAF has a market cap of 4.61B. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while AACAF trades at $3.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas AACAF's P/E ratio is 18.57. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to AACAF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to AACAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, LITE has a market cap of 4.37B. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while LITE trades at $63.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas LITE's P/E ratio is -8.18. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to LITE's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to LITE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, BDC has a market cap of 4.16B. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while BDC trades at $104.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas BDC's P/E ratio is 20.21. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to BDC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to BDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, MAXR has a market cap of 4.00B. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while MAXR trades at $52.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas MAXR's P/E ratio is -26.10. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to MAXR's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is more volatile compared to MAXR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, PI has a market cap of 2.85B. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while PI trades at $98.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas PI's P/E ratio is 70.83. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to PI's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to PI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, ETCMY has a market cap of 2.46B. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while ETCMY trades at $1.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas ETCMY's P/E ratio is -2.23. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to ETCMY's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to ETCMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, VIAV has a market cap of 2.01B. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while VIAV trades at $9.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas VIAV's P/E ratio is 451.50. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to VIAV's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to VIAV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, EXTR has a market cap of 1.86B. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while EXTR trades at $14.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas EXTR's P/E ratio is -34.17. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to EXTR's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to EXTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, HMNKF has a market cap of 1.84B. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while HMNKF trades at $36.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas HMNKF's P/E ratio is 55.53. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to HMNKF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is more volatile compared to HMNKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, VTKLY has a market cap of 1.70B. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while VTKLY trades at $6.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas VTKLY's P/E ratio is 10.48. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to VTKLY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to VTKLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, INFN has a market cap of 1.57B. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while INFN trades at $6.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas INFN's P/E ratio is -10.38. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to INFN's ROE of -1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is more volatile compared to INFN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, VTKLF has a market cap of 1.47B. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while VTKLF trades at $5.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas VTKLF's P/E ratio is 9.08. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to VTKLF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to VTKLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, KN has a market cap of 1.42B. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while KN trades at $16.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas KN's P/E ratio is 62.81. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to KN's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is more volatile compared to KN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, YZOFF has a market cap of 1.33B. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while YZOFF trades at $1.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas YZOFF's P/E ratio is 4.90. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to YZOFF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to YZOFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, SWIR has a market cap of 1.21B. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while SWIR trades at $30.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas SWIR's P/E ratio is -22.82. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to SWIR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UI is more volatile compared to SWIR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, VSAT has a market cap of 1.19B. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while VSAT trades at $9.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas VSAT's P/E ratio is -2.94. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to VSAT's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to VSAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, ADVOF has a market cap of 1.09B. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while ADVOF trades at $20.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas ADVOF's P/E ratio is -40.88. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to ADVOF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to ADVOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, EUTLF has a market cap of 1.07B. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while EUTLF trades at $2.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas EUTLF's P/E ratio is -0.97. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to EUTLF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to EUTLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, HLIT has a market cap of 1.05B. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while HLIT trades at $8.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas HLIT's P/E ratio is 19.84. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to HLIT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to HLIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, DGII has a market cap of 1.03B. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while DGII trades at $28.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas DGII's P/E ratio is 29.20. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to DGII's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to DGII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, COMM has a market cap of 1.03B. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while COMM trades at $4.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas COMM's P/E ratio is -26.39. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to COMM's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to COMM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, HTCKF has a market cap of 976.07M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while HTCKF trades at $6.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas HTCKF's P/E ratio is -14.13. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to HTCKF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is more volatile compared to HTCKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, FXCNF has a market cap of 946.14M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while FXCNF trades at $0.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas FXCNF's P/E ratio is -12.00. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to FXCNF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to FXCNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, POLY has a market cap of 790.50M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while POLY trades at $39.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas POLY's P/E ratio is 75.13. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to POLY's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is more volatile compared to POLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, NTGR has a market cap of 779.41M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while NTGR trades at $27.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas NTGR's P/E ratio is 64.48. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to NTGR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to NTGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, UBLXF has a market cap of 769.98M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while UBLXF trades at $103.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas UBLXF's P/E ratio is -7.05. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to UBLXF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to UBLXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, COBJF has a market cap of 702.71M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while COBJF trades at $0.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas COBJF's P/E ratio is -7.59. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to COBJF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to COBJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, ITRN has a market cap of 695.28M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while ITRN trades at $34.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas ITRN's P/E ratio is 12.94. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to ITRN's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to ITRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, AIOT has a market cap of 673.15M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while AIOT trades at $5.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas AIOT's P/E ratio is -9.77. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to AIOT's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to AIOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, ADTN has a market cap of 631.30M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while ADTN trades at $7.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas ADTN's P/E ratio is -1.39. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to ADTN's ROE of -2.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to ADTN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, EVTZF has a market cap of 602.65M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while EVTZF trades at $7.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas EVTZF's P/E ratio is 13.93. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to EVTZF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is more volatile compared to EVTZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, FXCNY has a market cap of 591.34M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while FXCNY trades at $1.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas FXCNY's P/E ratio is -30.00. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to FXCNY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to FXCNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, OKIEF has a market cap of 577.93M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while OKIEF trades at $6.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas OKIEF's P/E ratio is 3.24. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to OKIEF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is more volatile compared to OKIEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, EVSBY has a market cap of 558.45M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while EVSBY trades at $9.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas EVSBY's P/E ratio is 11.05. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to EVSBY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is more volatile compared to EVSBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, OKIEY has a market cap of 528.93M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while OKIEY trades at $6.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas OKIEY's P/E ratio is 2.96. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to OKIEY's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is more volatile compared to OKIEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, PWFL has a market cap of 490.59M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while PWFL trades at $4.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas PWFL's P/E ratio is -9.33. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to PWFL's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to PWFL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, SATOF has a market cap of 465.20M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while SATOF trades at $14.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas SATOF's P/E ratio is 10.61. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to SATOF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is more volatile compared to SATOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, CLFD has a market cap of 435.82M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while CLFD trades at $30.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas CLFD's P/E ratio is -50.56. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to CLFD's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to CLFD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, GILT has a market cap of 366.62M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while GILT trades at $6.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas GILT's P/E ratio is 14.61. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to GILT's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to GILT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, ITI has a market cap of 309.47M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while ITI trades at $7.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas ITI's P/E ratio is 239.67. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to ITI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is more volatile compared to ITI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, FLTCF has a market cap of 280.87M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while FLTCF trades at $1.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas FLTCF's P/E ratio is 21.38. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to FLTCF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to FLTCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, AUDC has a market cap of 275.43M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while AUDC trades at $9.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas AUDC's P/E ratio is 18.56. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to AUDC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to AUDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, AVNW has a market cap of 241.63M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while AVNW trades at $19.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas AVNW's P/E ratio is -119.06. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to AVNW's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to AVNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, TSAT has a market cap of 222.93M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while TSAT trades at $16.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas TSAT's P/E ratio is -3.62. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to TSAT's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to TSAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, PAOTF has a market cap of 214.92M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while PAOTF trades at $7.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas PAOTF's P/E ratio is -9.46. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to PAOTF's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to PAOTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, CRNT has a market cap of 204.33M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while CRNT trades at $2.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas CRNT's P/E ratio is 8.52. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to CRNT's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to CRNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, FEIM has a market cap of 174.85M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while FEIM trades at $18.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas FEIM's P/E ratio is 7.50. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to FEIM's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is more volatile compared to FEIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, SATX has a market cap of 174.17M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while SATX trades at $2.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas SATX's P/E ratio is -3.72. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to SATX's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is more volatile compared to SATX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, BKTI has a market cap of 162.59M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while BKTI trades at $45.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas BKTI's P/E ratio is 20.16. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to BKTI's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to BKTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, VNWTF has a market cap of 161.21M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while VNWTF trades at $6.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas VNWTF's P/E ratio is 26.52. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to VNWTF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to VNWTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, PCTI has a market cap of 135.28M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while PCTI trades at $6.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas PCTI's P/E ratio is 30.39. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to PCTI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is more volatile compared to PCTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, INSG has a market cap of 121.55M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while INSG trades at $8.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas INSG's P/E ratio is -5.74. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to INSG's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to INSG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, QTRHF has a market cap of 121.00M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while QTRHF trades at $1.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas QTRHF's P/E ratio is -10.45. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to QTRHF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is more volatile compared to QTRHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, ONDS has a market cap of 102.01M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while ONDS trades at $0.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas ONDS's P/E ratio is -1.25. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to ONDS's ROE of -1.93%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to ONDS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, KVHI has a market cap of 98.42M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while KVHI trades at $5.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas KVHI's P/E ratio is -8.77. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to KVHI's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is more volatile compared to KVHI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, ATSKF has a market cap of 93.81M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while ATSKF trades at $0.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas ATSKF's P/E ratio is 7.30. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to ATSKF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is more volatile compared to ATSKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, SILC has a market cap of 92.28M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while SILC trades at $15.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas SILC's P/E ratio is -7.60. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to SILC's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to SILC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, NPNZF has a market cap of 91.75M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while NPNZF trades at $8.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas NPNZF's P/E ratio is -11.23. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to NPNZF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is more volatile compared to NPNZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, LTRX has a market cap of 85.73M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while LTRX trades at $2.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas LTRX's P/E ratio is -17.00. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to LTRX's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to LTRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, TESS has a market cap of 83.30M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while TESS trades at $8.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas TESS's P/E ratio is -19.13. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to TESS's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is more volatile compared to TESS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, JCS has a market cap of 77.02M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while JCS trades at $8.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas JCS's P/E ratio is 6.60. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to JCS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to JCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, FKWL has a market cap of 56.68M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while FKWL trades at $4.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas FKWL's P/E ratio is -25.32. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to FKWL's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to FKWL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, AIRG has a market cap of 48.32M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while AIRG trades at $4.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas AIRG's P/E ratio is -5.29. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to AIRG's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to AIRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, ELSLF has a market cap of 48.10M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while ELSLF trades at $0.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas ELSLF's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to ELSLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UI is more volatile compared to ELSLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, WTT has a market cap of 45.31M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while WTT trades at $2.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas WTT's P/E ratio is -19.32. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to WTT's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is more volatile compared to WTT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, SIMTF has a market cap of 45.01M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while SIMTF trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas SIMTF's P/E ratio is 1.05. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to SIMTF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to SIMTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, CMTL has a market cap of 43.43M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while CMTL trades at $1.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas CMTL's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to CMTL's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to CMTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, BEWFF has a market cap of 41.59M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while BEWFF trades at $0.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas BEWFF's P/E ratio is 47.00. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to BEWFF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is more volatile compared to BEWFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, AMPGW has a market cap of 39.55M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while AMPGW trades at $0.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas AMPGW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to AMPGW's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to AMPGW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, AMPG has a market cap of 37.75M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while AMPG trades at $1.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas AMPG's P/E ratio is -1.78. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to AMPG's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to AMPG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, ASROF has a market cap of 36.30M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while ASROF trades at $0.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas ASROF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to ASROF's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is more volatile compared to ASROF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, BYLTF has a market cap of 30.83M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while BYLTF trades at $0.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas BYLTF's P/E ratio is -5.08. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to BYLTF's ROE of +1.61%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to BYLTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, CYSNF has a market cap of 30.06M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while CYSNF trades at $0.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas CYSNF's P/E ratio is -71.14. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to CYSNF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is more volatile compared to CYSNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, OCC has a market cap of 25.95M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while OCC trades at $3.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas OCC's P/E ratio is -6.33. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to OCC's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to OCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, UTSI has a market cap of 25.19M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while UTSI trades at $2.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas UTSI's P/E ratio is -5.54. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to UTSI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is more volatile compared to UTSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, BOSC has a market cap of 22.63M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while BOSC trades at $3.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas BOSC's P/E ratio is 9.79. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to BOSC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to BOSC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, WSTL has a market cap of 21.80M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while WSTL trades at $1.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas WSTL's P/E ratio is -8.52. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to WSTL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is more volatile compared to WSTL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, CLRO has a market cap of 13.93M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while CLRO trades at $0.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas CLRO's P/E ratio is -1.45. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to CLRO's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to CLRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, SONM has a market cap of 13.15M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while SONM trades at $1.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas SONM's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to SONM's ROE of -2.87%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to SONM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, MILOF has a market cap of 12.84M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while MILOF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas MILOF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to MILOF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UI is more volatile compared to MILOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, CMBM has a market cap of 12.71M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while CMBM trades at $0.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas CMBM's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to CMBM's ROE of -1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to CMBM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, SYNX has a market cap of 11.54M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while SYNX trades at $1.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas SYNX's P/E ratio is -7.57. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to SYNX's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to SYNX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, IOTR has a market cap of 10.20M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while IOTR trades at $0.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas IOTR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to IOTR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to IOTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, ATGN has a market cap of 9.87M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while ATGN trades at $0.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas ATGN's P/E ratio is -4.21. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to ATGN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is more volatile compared to ATGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, KPIFF has a market cap of 9.23M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while KPIFF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas KPIFF's P/E ratio is -3.88. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to KPIFF's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to KPIFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, CYCA has a market cap of 8.77M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while CYCA trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas CYCA's P/E ratio is -1.87. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to CYCA's ROE of +5.72%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to CYCA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, ENAFF has a market cap of 7.67M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while ENAFF trades at $0.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas ENAFF's P/E ratio is -0.66. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to ENAFF's ROE of +0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to ENAFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, ASNS has a market cap of 6.68M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while ASNS trades at $0.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas ASNS's P/E ratio is -0.92. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to ASNS's ROE of -3.44%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to ASNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, VMNT has a market cap of 6.46M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while VMNT trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas VMNT's P/E ratio is -4.40. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to VMNT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to VMNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, LTCCF has a market cap of 6.17M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while LTCCF trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas LTCCF's P/E ratio is -2.96. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to LTCCF's ROE of +8.51%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is more volatile compared to LTCCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, VISL has a market cap of 5.91M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while VISL trades at $2.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas VISL's P/E ratio is -0.68. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to VISL's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is more volatile compared to VISL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, MITQ has a market cap of 5.82M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while MITQ trades at $0.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas MITQ's P/E ratio is -3.68. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to MITQ's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to MITQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, AKTS has a market cap of 5.75M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while AKTS trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas AKTS's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to AKTS's ROE of +23.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to AKTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, MINM has a market cap of 5.41M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while MINM trades at $1.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas MINM's P/E ratio is -0.82. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to MINM's ROE of +2.61%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is more volatile compared to MINM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, MOYFF has a market cap of 4.76M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while MOYFF trades at $0.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas MOYFF's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to MOYFF's ROE of +8.70%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is more volatile compared to MOYFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, ISEYF has a market cap of 4.36M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while ISEYF trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas ISEYF's P/E ratio is -2.64. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to ISEYF's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to ISEYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, STRH has a market cap of 3.78M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while STRH trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas STRH's P/E ratio is -7.06. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to STRH's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to STRH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, HPNN has a market cap of 3.72M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while HPNN trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas HPNN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to HPNN's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to HPNN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, CASA has a market cap of 3.47M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while CASA trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas CASA's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to CASA's ROE of +1.82%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to CASA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, BOXL has a market cap of 3.43M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while BOXL trades at $1.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas BOXL's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to BOXL's ROE of -1.69%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to BOXL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, SYTAW has a market cap of 3.35M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while SYTAW trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas SYTAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to SYTAW's ROE of -4.62%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to SYTAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, TTLTF has a market cap of 3.21M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while TTLTF trades at $0.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas TTLTF's P/E ratio is 12.15. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to TTLTF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to TTLTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, SYTA has a market cap of 3.20M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while SYTA trades at $1.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas SYTA's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to SYTA's ROE of -4.62%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to SYTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, WLAN has a market cap of 2.79M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while WLAN trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas WLAN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to WLAN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to WLAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, NRRWF has a market cap of 2.25M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while NRRWF trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas NRRWF's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to NRRWF's ROE of -8.90%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is more volatile compared to NRRWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, MYNA has a market cap of 1.66M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while MYNA trades at $0.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas MYNA's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to MYNA's ROE of +8.70%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to MYNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, NVRVF has a market cap of 1.54M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while NVRVF trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas NVRVF's P/E ratio is -2.30. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to NVRVF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is more volatile compared to NVRVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, LMGR has a market cap of 1.47M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while LMGR trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas LMGR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to LMGR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to LMGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, CNTFY has a market cap of 1.27M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while CNTFY trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas CNTFY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to CNTFY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UI is more volatile compared to CNTFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, MOBBW has a market cap of 1.09M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while MOBBW trades at $0.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas MOBBW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to MOBBW's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to MOBBW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, MFCO has a market cap of 928440.00. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while MFCO trades at $0.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas MFCO's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to MFCO's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to MFCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, BDRL has a market cap of 921223.00. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while BDRL trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas BDRL's P/E ratio is -1.72. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to BDRL's ROE of +1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is more volatile compared to BDRL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, DZSI has a market cap of 810698.00. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while DZSI trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas DZSI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to DZSI's ROE of -2.37%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to DZSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, TPTW has a market cap of 735711.00. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while TPTW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas TPTW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to TPTW's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is more volatile compared to TPTW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, MLRT has a market cap of 618459.00. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while MLRT trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas MLRT's P/E ratio is -0.82. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to MLRT's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is more volatile compared to MLRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, ELST has a market cap of 494650.00. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while ELST trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas ELST's P/E ratio is -1.67. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to ELST's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to ELST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, ATCLF has a market cap of 493528.00. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while ATCLF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas ATCLF's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to ATCLF's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to ATCLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, VCTY has a market cap of 479580.00. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while VCTY trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas VCTY's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to VCTY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to VCTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, CRMK has a market cap of 441374.00. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while CRMK trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas CRMK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to CRMK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to CRMK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, IPTK has a market cap of 429764.00. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while IPTK trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas IPTK's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to IPTK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is more volatile compared to IPTK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, AXBSF has a market cap of 425865.00. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while AXBSF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas AXBSF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to AXBSF's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to AXBSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, AAPJ has a market cap of 355976.00. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while AAPJ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas AAPJ's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to AAPJ's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is more volatile compared to AAPJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, BKSD has a market cap of 273869.00. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while BKSD trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas BKSD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to BKSD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UI is more volatile compared to BKSD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, WGNR has a market cap of 241609.00. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while WGNR trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas WGNR's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to WGNR's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to WGNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, CAMPQ has a market cap of 120572.00. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while CAMPQ trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas CAMPQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to CAMPQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to CAMPQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, ERFB has a market cap of 84128.00. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while ERFB trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas ERFB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to ERFB's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is more volatile compared to ERFB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, PDXP has a market cap of 81715.00. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while PDXP trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas PDXP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to PDXP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to PDXP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, EZEN has a market cap of 72600.00. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while EZEN trades at $3,300.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas EZEN's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to EZEN's ROE of -1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. UI has daily volatility of 1.93 and EZEN has daily volatility of N/A.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, PMOZ has a market cap of 68195.00. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while PMOZ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas PMOZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to PMOZ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UI is more volatile compared to PMOZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, CRLI has a market cap of 60539.00. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while CRLI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas CRLI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to CRLI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is more volatile compared to CRLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, ETCIA has a market cap of 55198.00. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while ETCIA trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas ETCIA's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to ETCIA's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is more volatile compared to ETCIA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, MOB has a market cap of 31926.00. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while MOB trades at $1.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas MOB's P/E ratio is -1.38. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to MOB's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to MOB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, FBCE has a market cap of 9988.00. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while FBCE trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas FBCE's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to FBCE's ROE of -1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to FBCE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, OTOW has a market cap of 8778.00. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while OTOW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas OTOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to OTOW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UI is more volatile compared to OTOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, UTRK has a market cap of 5912.00. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while UTRK trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas UTRK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to UTRK's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to UTRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, LTTC has a market cap of 4788.00. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while LTTC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas LTTC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to LTTC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to LTTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, JUMT has a market cap of 4647.00. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while JUMT trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas JUMT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to JUMT's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to JUMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, AVSR has a market cap of 4086.00. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while AVSR trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas AVSR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to AVSR's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is more volatile compared to AVSR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, MPEG has a market cap of 3799.00. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while MPEG trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas MPEG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to MPEG's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to MPEG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, WIRX has a market cap of 3500.00. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while WIRX trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas WIRX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to WIRX's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to WIRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, CYBD has a market cap of 3353.00. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while CYBD trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas CYBD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to CYBD's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is more volatile compared to CYBD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, VRCM has a market cap of 2980.00. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while VRCM trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas VRCM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to VRCM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to VRCM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, IZNN has a market cap of 2468.00. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while IZNN trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas IZNN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to IZNN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to IZNN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, PRXM has a market cap of 2386.00. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while PRXM trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas PRXM's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to PRXM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UI is more volatile compared to PRXM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, RPDT has a market cap of 2170.00. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while RPDT trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas RPDT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to RPDT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to RPDT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, XCOMQ has a market cap of 1722.00. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while XCOMQ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas XCOMQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to XCOMQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to XCOMQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, RITT has a market cap of 1554.00. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while RITT trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas RITT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to RITT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to RITT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, ZSTN has a market cap of 1160.00. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while ZSTN trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas ZSTN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to ZSTN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to ZSTN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, ABILF has a market cap of 799.00. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while ABILF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas ABILF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to ABILF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is more volatile compared to ABILF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, GNRD has a market cap of 353.00. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while GNRD trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas GNRD's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to GNRD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is more volatile compared to GNRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, ZTNO has a market cap of 301.00. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while ZTNO trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas ZTNO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to ZTNO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to ZTNO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, TCCO has a market cap of 185.00. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while TCCO trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas TCCO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to TCCO's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is more volatile compared to TCCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, HDIH has a market cap of 45.00. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while HDIH trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas HDIH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to HDIH's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UI is more volatile compared to HDIH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, LMSC has a market cap of 31.00. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while LMSC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas LMSC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to LMSC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UI is more volatile compared to LMSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, STCI has a market cap of 20.00. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while STCI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas STCI's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to STCI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UI is more volatile compared to STCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, ORSX has a market cap of 3.00. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while ORSX trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas ORSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to ORSX's ROE of -2.51%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is more volatile compared to ORSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, BETW has a market cap of 3.00. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while BETW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas BETW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to BETW's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to BETW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, DGIV comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while DGIV trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas DGIV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to DGIV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to DGIV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, SATX-WTA comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while SATX-WTA trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas SATX-WTA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to SATX-WTA's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to SATX-WTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, VCRA comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while VCRA trades at $79.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas VCRA's P/E ratio is -316.52. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to VCRA's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is more volatile compared to VCRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, BDR comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while BDR trades at $0.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas BDR's P/E ratio is -5.87. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to BDR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to BDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, AXCP comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while AXCP trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas AXCP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to AXCP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to AXCP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, EXFO comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while EXFO trades at $6.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas EXFO's P/E ratio is -56.31. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to EXFO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is more volatile compared to EXFO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.

UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 20.76B. In comparison, ORBC comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $343.26, while ORBC trades at $11.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UI currently has a P/E ratio of 46.64, whereas ORBC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.97%, compared to ORBC's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is more volatile compared to ORBC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.