Ubiquiti Inc.
Ubiquiti Inc. UI Peers
See (UI) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Communication Equipment Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UI | $411.65 | +2.21% | 24.9B | 45.38 | $9.08 | +0.59% |
| CSCO | $69.38 | +1.06% | 274.7B | 28.32 | $2.45 | +2.33% |
| MSI | $420.46 | +0.43% | 70.2B | 35.09 | $11.98 | +1.01% |
| ERIC | $8.48 | +0.47% | 28B | 169.60 | $0.05 | +0.31% |
| NOK | $5.18 | +0.19% | 27.9B | 19.88 | $0.26 | +2.80% |
| HPE | $20.45 | +11.08% | 26.8B | 19.66 | $1.04 | +2.54% |
| ASTS | $46.73 | -5.33% | 16.4B | -23.60 | -$1.98 | N/A |
| CRDO | $92.59 | -0.96% | 15.7B | 319.28 | $0.29 | N/A |
| ZBRA | $308.36 | -0.29% | 15.7B | 29.19 | $10.56 | N/A |
| JNPR | $39.93 | +8.45% | 13.3B | 38.00 | $1.05 | +2.21% |
Stock Comparison
UI vs CSCO Comparison
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 24.9B. In comparison, CSCO has a market cap of 274.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $411.65, while CSCO trades at $69.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 45.38, whereas CSCO's P/E ratio is 28.32. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to CSCO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to CSCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.
UI vs MSI Comparison
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 24.9B. In comparison, MSI has a market cap of 70.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $411.65, while MSI trades at $420.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 45.38, whereas MSI's P/E ratio is 35.09. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to MSI's ROE of +1.50%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is more volatile compared to MSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.
UI vs ERIC Comparison
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 24.9B. In comparison, ERIC has a market cap of 28B. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $411.65, while ERIC trades at $8.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 45.38, whereas ERIC's P/E ratio is 169.60. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to ERIC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to ERIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.
UI vs NOK Comparison
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 24.9B. In comparison, NOK has a market cap of 27.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $411.65, while NOK trades at $5.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 45.38, whereas NOK's P/E ratio is 19.88. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to NOK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to NOK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.
UI vs HPE Comparison
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 24.9B. In comparison, HPE has a market cap of 26.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $411.65, while HPE trades at $20.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 45.38, whereas HPE's P/E ratio is 19.66. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to HPE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to HPE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.
UI vs ASTS Comparison
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 24.9B. In comparison, ASTS has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $411.65, while ASTS trades at $46.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 45.38, whereas ASTS's P/E ratio is -23.60. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to ASTS's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to ASTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.
UI vs CRDO Comparison
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 24.9B. In comparison, CRDO has a market cap of 15.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $411.65, while CRDO trades at $92.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 45.38, whereas CRDO's P/E ratio is 319.28. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to CRDO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to CRDO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.
UI vs ZBRA Comparison
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 24.9B. In comparison, ZBRA has a market cap of 15.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $411.65, while ZBRA trades at $308.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 45.38, whereas ZBRA's P/E ratio is 29.19. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to ZBRA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to ZBRA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.
UI vs JNPR Comparison
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 24.9B. In comparison, JNPR has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $411.65, while JNPR trades at $39.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 45.38, whereas JNPR's P/E ratio is 38.00. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to JNPR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is more volatile compared to JNPR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.
UI vs CIEN Comparison
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 24.9B. In comparison, CIEN has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $411.65, while CIEN trades at $81.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 45.38, whereas CIEN's P/E ratio is 111.37. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to CIEN's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to CIEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.
UI vs SATS Comparison
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 24.9B. In comparison, SATS has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $411.65, while SATS trades at $27.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 45.38, whereas SATS's P/E ratio is -36.93. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to SATS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to SATS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.
UI vs LITE Comparison
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 24.9B. In comparison, LITE has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $411.65, while LITE trades at $95.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 45.38, whereas LITE's P/E ratio is -14.72. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to LITE's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to LITE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.
UI vs BDC Comparison
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 24.9B. In comparison, BDC has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $411.65, while BDC trades at $115.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 45.38, whereas BDC's P/E ratio is 22.35. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to BDC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to BDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.
UI vs MAXR Comparison
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 24.9B. In comparison, MAXR has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $411.65, while MAXR trades at $52.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 45.38, whereas MAXR's P/E ratio is -26.10. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to MAXR's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is more volatile compared to MAXR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.
UI vs PI Comparison
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 24.9B. In comparison, PI has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $411.65, while PI trades at $111.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 45.38, whereas PI's P/E ratio is -1851.17. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to PI's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to PI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.
UI vs EXTR Comparison
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 24.9B. In comparison, EXTR has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $411.65, while EXTR trades at $17.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 45.38, whereas EXTR's P/E ratio is -43.78. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to EXTR's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to EXTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.
UI vs VIAV Comparison
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 24.9B. In comparison, VIAV has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $411.65, while VIAV trades at $10.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 45.38, whereas VIAV's P/E ratio is 503.50. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to VIAV's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is more volatile compared to VIAV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.
UI vs VSAT Comparison
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 24.9B. In comparison, VSAT has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $411.65, while VSAT trades at $14.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 45.38, whereas VSAT's P/E ratio is -3.26. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to VSAT's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to VSAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.
UI vs COMM Comparison
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 24.9B. In comparison, COMM has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $411.65, while COMM trades at $8.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 45.38, whereas COMM's P/E ratio is -46.00. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to COMM's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to COMM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.
UI vs INFN Comparison
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 24.9B. In comparison, INFN has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $411.65, while INFN trades at $6.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 45.38, whereas INFN's P/E ratio is -10.38. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to INFN's ROE of -1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is more volatile compared to INFN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.
UI vs KN Comparison
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 24.9B. In comparison, KN has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $411.65, while KN trades at $17.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 45.38, whereas KN's P/E ratio is 65.28. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to KN's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to KN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.
UI vs DGII Comparison
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 24.9B. In comparison, DGII has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $411.65, while DGII trades at $34.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 45.38, whereas DGII's P/E ratio is 30.85. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to DGII's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to DGII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.
UI vs SWIR Comparison
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 24.9B. In comparison, SWIR has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $411.65, while SWIR trades at $30.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 45.38, whereas SWIR's P/E ratio is -22.82. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to SWIR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UI is more volatile compared to SWIR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.
UI vs HLIT Comparison
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 24.9B. In comparison, HLIT has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $411.65, while HLIT trades at $9.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 45.38, whereas HLIT's P/E ratio is 21.04. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to HLIT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to HLIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.
UI vs NTGR Comparison
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 24.9B. In comparison, NTGR has a market cap of 836.7M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $411.65, while NTGR trades at $29.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 45.38, whereas NTGR's P/E ratio is 34.61. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to NTGR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to NTGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.
UI vs POLY Comparison
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 24.9B. In comparison, POLY has a market cap of 790.5M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $411.65, while POLY trades at $39.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 45.38, whereas POLY's P/E ratio is 75.13. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to POLY's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is more volatile compared to POLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.
UI vs ITRN Comparison
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 24.9B. In comparison, ITRN has a market cap of 770.5M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $411.65, while ITRN trades at $38.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 45.38, whereas ITRN's P/E ratio is 13.98. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to ITRN's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to ITRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.
UI vs ADTN Comparison
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 24.9B. In comparison, ADTN has a market cap of 717.9M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $411.65, while ADTN trades at $8.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 45.38, whereas ADTN's P/E ratio is -5.57. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to ADTN's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to ADTN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.
UI vs CLFD Comparison
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 24.9B. In comparison, CLFD has a market cap of 600.4M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $411.65, while CLFD trades at $43.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 45.38, whereas CLFD's P/E ratio is -310.07. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to CLFD's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to CLFD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.
UI vs AIOT Comparison
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 24.9B. In comparison, AIOT has a market cap of 574.8M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $411.65, while AIOT trades at $4.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 45.38, whereas AIOT's P/E ratio is -10.02. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to AIOT's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to AIOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.
UI vs PWFL Comparison
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 24.9B. In comparison, PWFL has a market cap of 490.6M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $411.65, while PWFL trades at $4.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 45.38, whereas PWFL's P/E ratio is -9.33. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to PWFL's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to PWFL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.
UI vs GILT Comparison
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 24.9B. In comparison, GILT has a market cap of 404.3M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $411.65, while GILT trades at $7.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 45.38, whereas GILT's P/E ratio is 29.54. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to GILT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to GILT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.
UI vs TSAT Comparison
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 24.9B. In comparison, TSAT has a market cap of 358.5M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $411.65, while TSAT trades at $24.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 45.38, whereas TSAT's P/E ratio is -5.32. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to TSAT's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to TSAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.
UI vs ONDS Comparison
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 24.9B. In comparison, ONDS has a market cap of 335.5M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $411.65, while ONDS trades at $1.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 45.38, whereas ONDS's P/E ratio is -3.25. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to ONDS's ROE of -2.26%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to ONDS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.
UI vs ITI Comparison
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 24.9B. In comparison, ITI has a market cap of 309.5M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $411.65, while ITI trades at $7.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 45.38, whereas ITI's P/E ratio is 239.67. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to ITI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is more volatile compared to ITI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.
UI vs AVNW Comparison
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 24.9B. In comparison, AVNW has a market cap of 306.3M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $411.65, while AVNW trades at $24.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 45.38, whereas AVNW's P/E ratio is -126.58. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to AVNW's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to AVNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.
UI vs AUDC Comparison
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 24.9B. In comparison, AUDC has a market cap of 291.5M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $411.65, while AUDC trades at $9.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 45.38, whereas AUDC's P/E ratio is 17.54. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to AUDC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to AUDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.
UI vs SATX Comparison
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 24.9B. In comparison, SATX has a market cap of 255.3M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $411.65, while SATX trades at $2.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 45.38, whereas SATX's P/E ratio is -5.67. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to SATX's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to SATX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.
UI vs FEIM Comparison
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 24.9B. In comparison, FEIM has a market cap of 219.8M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $411.65, while FEIM trades at $22.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 45.38, whereas FEIM's P/E ratio is 9.42. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to FEIM's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to FEIM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.
UI vs CRNT Comparison
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 24.9B. In comparison, CRNT has a market cap of 218.5M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $411.65, while CRNT trades at $2.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 45.38, whereas CRNT's P/E ratio is 9.46. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to CRNT's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to CRNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.
UI vs BKTI Comparison
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 24.9B. In comparison, BKTI has a market cap of 172.5M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $411.65, while BKTI trades at $47.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 45.38, whereas BKTI's P/E ratio is 17.99. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to BKTI's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to BKTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.
UI vs PCTI Comparison
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 24.9B. In comparison, PCTI has a market cap of 135.3M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $411.65, while PCTI trades at $6.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 45.38, whereas PCTI's P/E ratio is 30.39. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to PCTI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is more volatile compared to PCTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.
UI vs INSG Comparison
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 24.9B. In comparison, INSG has a market cap of 123.7M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $411.65, while INSG trades at $8.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 45.38, whereas INSG's P/E ratio is -8.08. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to INSG's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to INSG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.
UI vs LTRX Comparison
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 24.9B. In comparison, LTRX has a market cap of 111.6M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $411.65, while LTRX trades at $2.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 45.38, whereas LTRX's P/E ratio is -13.05. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to LTRX's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to LTRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.
UI vs KVHI Comparison
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 24.9B. In comparison, KVHI has a market cap of 104.5M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $411.65, while KVHI trades at $5.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 45.38, whereas KVHI's P/E ratio is -10.66. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to KVHI's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to KVHI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.
UI vs SILC Comparison
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 24.9B. In comparison, SILC has a market cap of 87.3M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $411.65, while SILC trades at $15.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 45.38, whereas SILC's P/E ratio is -6.90. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to SILC's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to SILC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.
UI vs TESS Comparison
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 24.9B. In comparison, TESS has a market cap of 83.3M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $411.65, while TESS trades at $8.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 45.38, whereas TESS's P/E ratio is -19.13. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to TESS's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is more volatile compared to TESS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.
UI vs JCS Comparison
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 24.9B. In comparison, JCS has a market cap of 77M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $411.65, while JCS trades at $8.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 45.38, whereas JCS's P/E ratio is 6.60. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to JCS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to JCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.
UI vs CMTL Comparison
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 24.9B. In comparison, CMTL has a market cap of 72M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $411.65, while CMTL trades at $2.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 45.38, whereas CMTL's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to CMTL's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to CMTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.
UI vs AMPGW Comparison
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 24.9B. In comparison, AMPGW has a market cap of 49.3M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $411.65, while AMPGW trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 45.38, whereas AMPGW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to AMPGW's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to AMPGW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.
UI vs FKWL Comparison
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 24.9B. In comparison, FKWL has a market cap of 49.3M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $411.65, while FKWL trades at $4.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 45.38, whereas FKWL's P/E ratio is -29.86. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to FKWL's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to FKWL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.
UI vs AIRG Comparison
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 24.9B. In comparison, AIRG has a market cap of 48.9M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $411.65, while AIRG trades at $4.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 45.38, whereas AIRG's P/E ratio is -6.01. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to AIRG's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to AIRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.
UI vs WTT Comparison
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 24.9B. In comparison, WTT has a market cap of 45.3M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $411.65, while WTT trades at $2.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 45.38, whereas WTT's P/E ratio is -19.32. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to WTT's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is more volatile compared to WTT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.
UI vs AMPG Comparison
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 24.9B. In comparison, AMPG has a market cap of 43.6M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $411.65, while AMPG trades at $2.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 45.38, whereas AMPG's P/E ratio is -3.07. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to AMPG's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to AMPG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.
UI vs BOSC Comparison
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 24.9B. In comparison, BOSC has a market cap of 28.7M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $411.65, while BOSC trades at $4.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 45.38, whereas BOSC's P/E ratio is 10.10. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to BOSC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to BOSC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.
UI vs UTSI Comparison
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 24.9B. In comparison, UTSI has a market cap of 24.6M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $411.65, while UTSI trades at $2.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 45.38, whereas UTSI's P/E ratio is -5.42. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to UTSI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to UTSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.
UI vs OCC Comparison
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 24.9B. In comparison, OCC has a market cap of 23.5M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $411.65, while OCC trades at $2.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 45.38, whereas OCC's P/E ratio is -7.50. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to OCC's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to OCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.
UI vs MOB Comparison
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 24.9B. In comparison, MOB has a market cap of 19M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $411.65, while MOB trades at $2.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 45.38, whereas MOB's P/E ratio is -1.92. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to MOB's ROE of -1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to MOB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.
UI vs SYTA Comparison
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 24.9B. In comparison, SYTA has a market cap of 15.1M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $411.65, while SYTA trades at $2.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 45.38, whereas SYTA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to SYTA's ROE of -5.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to SYTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.
UI vs SYTAW Comparison
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 24.9B. In comparison, SYTAW has a market cap of 12.1M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $411.65, while SYTAW trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 45.38, whereas SYTAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to SYTAW's ROE of -5.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to SYTAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.
UI vs CMBM Comparison
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 24.9B. In comparison, CMBM has a market cap of 11.4M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $411.65, while CMBM trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 45.38, whereas CMBM's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to CMBM's ROE of -1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to CMBM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.
UI vs SYNX Comparison
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 24.9B. In comparison, SYNX has a market cap of 11.3M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $411.65, while SYNX trades at $1.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 45.38, whereas SYNX's P/E ratio is -3.78. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to SYNX's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to SYNX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.
UI vs SONM Comparison
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 24.9B. In comparison, SONM has a market cap of 11.2M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $411.65, while SONM trades at $1.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 45.38, whereas SONM's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to SONM's ROE of -4.65%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to SONM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.
UI vs IOTR Comparison
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 24.9B. In comparison, IOTR has a market cap of 10.5M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $411.65, while IOTR trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 45.38, whereas IOTR's P/E ratio is -40.95. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to IOTR's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to IOTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.
UI vs MINM Comparison
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 24.9B. In comparison, MINM has a market cap of 10.3M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $411.65, while MINM trades at $2.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 45.38, whereas MINM's P/E ratio is -10.62. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to MINM's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to MINM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.
UI vs CLRO Comparison
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 24.9B. In comparison, CLRO has a market cap of 9.9M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $411.65, while CLRO trades at $5.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 45.38, whereas CLRO's P/E ratio is -0.96. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to CLRO's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to CLRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.
UI vs MITQ Comparison
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 24.9B. In comparison, MITQ has a market cap of 6.5M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $411.65, while MITQ trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 45.38, whereas MITQ's P/E ratio is -5.49. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to MITQ's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to MITQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.
UI vs AKTS Comparison
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 24.9B. In comparison, AKTS has a market cap of 5.8M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $411.65, while AKTS trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 45.38, whereas AKTS's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to AKTS's ROE of +23.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to AKTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.
UI vs ASNS Comparison
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 24.9B. In comparison, ASNS has a market cap of 5.7M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $411.65, while ASNS trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 45.38, whereas ASNS's P/E ratio is -1.08. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to ASNS's ROE of -1.78%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to ASNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.
UI vs VISL Comparison
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 24.9B. In comparison, VISL has a market cap of 5.2M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $411.65, while VISL trades at $1.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 45.38, whereas VISL's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to VISL's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to VISL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.
UI vs BOXL Comparison
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 24.9B. In comparison, BOXL has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $411.65, while BOXL trades at $1.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 45.38, whereas BOXL's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to BOXL's ROE of -1.71%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to BOXL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.
UI vs CASA Comparison
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 24.9B. In comparison, CASA has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $411.65, while CASA trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 45.38, whereas CASA's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to CASA's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to CASA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.
UI vs MOBBW Comparison
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 24.9B. In comparison, MOBBW has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $411.65, while MOBBW trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 45.38, whereas MOBBW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to MOBBW's ROE of -1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is more volatile compared to MOBBW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.
UI vs MYNA Comparison
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 24.9B. In comparison, MYNA has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $411.65, while MYNA trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 45.38, whereas MYNA's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to MYNA's ROE of +8.70%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to MYNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.
UI vs DZSI Comparison
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 24.9B. In comparison, DZSI has a market cap of 810.7K. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $411.65, while DZSI trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 45.38, whereas DZSI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to DZSI's ROE of -2.37%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to DZSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.
UI vs EXFO Comparison
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 24.9B. In comparison, EXFO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $411.65, while EXFO trades at $6.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 45.38, whereas EXFO's P/E ratio is -56.31. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to EXFO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is more volatile compared to EXFO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.
UI vs BDR Comparison
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 24.9B. In comparison, BDR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $411.65, while BDR trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 45.38, whereas BDR's P/E ratio is -5.87. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to BDR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to BDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.
UI vs VCRA Comparison
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 24.9B. In comparison, VCRA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $411.65, while VCRA trades at $79.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 45.38, whereas VCRA's P/E ratio is -316.52. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to VCRA's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is more volatile compared to VCRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.
UI vs ZXZZT Comparison
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 24.9B. In comparison, ZXZZT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $411.65, while ZXZZT trades at $12.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 45.38, whereas ZXZZT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to ZXZZT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UI is more volatile compared to ZXZZT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.
UI vs SATX-WTA Comparison
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 24.9B. In comparison, SATX-WTA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $411.65, while SATX-WTA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 45.38, whereas SATX-WTA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to SATX-WTA's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to SATX-WTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.
UI vs ORBC Comparison
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 24.9B. In comparison, ORBC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $411.65, while ORBC trades at $11.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 45.38, whereas ORBC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +2.17%, compared to ORBC's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is more volatile compared to ORBC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.