Domtar Corporation (UFS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (UFS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Paper, Lumber & Forest Products Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UFS | $55.49 | +0.02% | 0 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| WY | $24.83 | +0.16% | 17.5B | 43.43 | $0.56 | +3.45% |
| SUZ | $8.44 | +0.18% | 10.2B | 4.68 | $1.77 | +2.57% |
| WFG | $71.84 | +2.73% | 5.4B | -4.71 | -$14.94 | +1.80% |
| LPX | $79.13 | +2.31% | 5.3B | 64.32 | $1.17 | +1.52% |
| UFPI | $88.08 | +2.29% | 4.7B | 18.26 | $4.60 | +1.69% |
| RFP | $21.92 | -0.36% | 1.7B | 18.96 | $1.16 | N/A |
| SLVM | $40.50 | +0.27% | 1.6B | 15.78 | $2.51 | +4.50% |
| SWM | $23.41 | -6.21% | 1.3B | 10.79 | $2.17 | +7.52% |
| MATV | $7.98 | -1.91% | 430.2M | 5.54 | $1.41 | +5.15% |
Stock Comparison
UFS vs WY Comparison June 2026
UFS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFS stands at 0. In comparison, WY has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UFS is priced at $55.49, while WY trades at $24.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WY's P/E ratio is 43.43. In terms of profitability, UFS's ROE is -0.37%, compared to WY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UFS is less volatile compared to WY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFS.Check WY's competition here
UFS vs SUZ Comparison June 2026
UFS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFS stands at 0. In comparison, SUZ has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UFS is priced at $55.49, while SUZ trades at $8.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SUZ's P/E ratio is 4.68. In terms of profitability, UFS's ROE is -0.37%, compared to SUZ's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, UFS is less volatile compared to SUZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFS.Check SUZ's competition here
UFS vs WFG Comparison June 2026
UFS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFS stands at 0. In comparison, WFG has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UFS is priced at $55.49, while WFG trades at $71.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WFG's P/E ratio is -4.71. In terms of profitability, UFS's ROE is -0.37%, compared to WFG's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, UFS is less volatile compared to WFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFS.Check WFG's competition here
UFS vs LPX Comparison June 2026
UFS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFS stands at 0. In comparison, LPX has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UFS is priced at $55.49, while LPX trades at $79.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LPX's P/E ratio is 64.32. In terms of profitability, UFS's ROE is -0.37%, compared to LPX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UFS is less volatile compared to LPX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFS.Check LPX's competition here
UFS vs UFPI Comparison June 2026
UFS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFS stands at 0. In comparison, UFPI has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UFS is priced at $55.49, while UFPI trades at $88.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UFPI's P/E ratio is 18.26. In terms of profitability, UFS's ROE is -0.37%, compared to UFPI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UFS is less volatile compared to UFPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFS.Check UFPI's competition here
UFS vs RFP Comparison June 2026
UFS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFS stands at 0. In comparison, RFP has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UFS is priced at $55.49, while RFP trades at $21.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RFP's P/E ratio is 18.96. In terms of profitability, UFS's ROE is -0.37%, compared to RFP's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, UFS is less volatile compared to RFP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFS.Check RFP's competition here
UFS vs SLVM Comparison June 2026
UFS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFS stands at 0. In comparison, SLVM has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UFS is priced at $55.49, while SLVM trades at $40.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SLVM's P/E ratio is 15.78. In terms of profitability, UFS's ROE is -0.37%, compared to SLVM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UFS is less volatile compared to SLVM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFS.Check SLVM's competition here
UFS vs SWM Comparison June 2026
UFS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFS stands at 0. In comparison, SWM has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UFS is priced at $55.49, while SWM trades at $23.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SWM's P/E ratio is 10.79. In terms of profitability, UFS's ROE is -0.37%, compared to SWM's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, UFS is less volatile compared to SWM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFS.Check SWM's competition here
UFS vs MATV Comparison June 2026
UFS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFS stands at 0. In comparison, MATV has a market cap of 430.2M. Regarding current trading prices, UFS is priced at $55.49, while MATV trades at $7.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MATV's P/E ratio is 5.54. In terms of profitability, UFS's ROE is -0.37%, compared to MATV's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, UFS is less volatile compared to MATV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFS.Check MATV's competition here
UFS vs CLW Comparison June 2026
UFS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFS stands at 0. In comparison, CLW has a market cap of 270.4M. Regarding current trading prices, UFS is priced at $55.49, while CLW trades at $16.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLW's P/E ratio is -4.51. In terms of profitability, UFS's ROE is -0.37%, compared to CLW's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UFS is less volatile compared to CLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFS.Check CLW's competition here
UFS vs GLT Comparison June 2026
UFS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFS stands at 0. In comparison, GLT has a market cap of 73.7M. Regarding current trading prices, UFS is priced at $55.49, while GLT trades at $21.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLT's P/E ratio is -1.04. In terms of profitability, UFS's ROE is -0.37%, compared to GLT's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, UFS is more volatile compared to GLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFS.Check GLT's competition here
UFS vs MERC Comparison June 2026
UFS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFS stands at 0. In comparison, MERC has a market cap of 59.2M. Regarding current trading prices, UFS is priced at $55.49, while MERC trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MERC's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, UFS's ROE is -0.37%, compared to MERC's ROE of -2.43%. Regarding short-term risk, UFS is less volatile compared to MERC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFS.Check MERC's competition here
UFS vs EVA Comparison June 2026
UFS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFS stands at 0. In comparison, EVA has a market cap of 31.3M. Regarding current trading prices, UFS is priced at $55.49, while EVA trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EVA's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, UFS's ROE is -0.37%, compared to EVA's ROE of -6.19%. Regarding short-term risk, UFS is less volatile compared to EVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFS.Check EVA's competition here
UFS vs JCTCF Comparison June 2026
UFS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFS stands at 0. In comparison, JCTCF has a market cap of 17.1M. Regarding current trading prices, UFS is priced at $55.49, while JCTCF trades at $4.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JCTCF's P/E ratio is 14.38. In terms of profitability, UFS's ROE is -0.37%, compared to JCTCF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UFS is more volatile compared to JCTCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFS.Check JCTCF's competition here
UFS vs JCTC Comparison June 2026
UFS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFS stands at 0. In comparison, JCTC has a market cap of 7.4M. Regarding current trading prices, UFS is priced at $55.49, while JCTC trades at $2.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JCTC's P/E ratio is -0.91. In terms of profitability, UFS's ROE is -0.37%, compared to JCTC's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, UFS is less volatile compared to JCTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFS.Check JCTC's competition here
UFS vs NWGL Comparison June 2026
UFS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFS stands at 0. In comparison, NWGL has a market cap of 4.3M. Regarding current trading prices, UFS is priced at $55.49, while NWGL trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NWGL's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, UFS's ROE is -0.37%, compared to NWGL's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, UFS is less volatile compared to NWGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFS.Check NWGL's competition here
UFS vs ITP Comparison June 2026
UFS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFS stands at 0. In comparison, ITP has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, UFS is priced at $55.49, while ITP trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ITP's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, UFS's ROE is -0.37%, compared to ITP's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UFS is less volatile compared to ITP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFS.Check ITP's competition here
UFS vs VRS Comparison June 2026
UFS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFS stands at 0. In comparison, VRS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UFS is priced at $55.49, while VRS trades at $26.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VRS's P/E ratio is -278.25. In terms of profitability, UFS's ROE is -0.37%, compared to VRS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UFS is less volatile compared to VRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFS.Check VRS's competition here
UFS vs DEL Comparison June 2026
UFS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFS stands at 0. In comparison, DEL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UFS is priced at $55.49, while DEL trades at $93.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DEL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UFS's ROE is -0.37%, compared to DEL's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UFS is less volatile compared to DEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFS.Check DEL's competition here
UFS vs KS Comparison June 2026
UFS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFS stands at 0. In comparison, KS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UFS is priced at $55.49, while KS trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UFS's ROE is -0.37%, compared to KS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, UFS is more volatile compared to KS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFS.Check KS's competition here
UFS vs AEPI Comparison June 2026
UFS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UFS stands at 0. In comparison, AEPI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UFS is priced at $55.49, while AEPI trades at $109.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UFS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AEPI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UFS's ROE is -0.37%, compared to AEPI's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, UFS is less volatile compared to AEPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UFS.Check AEPI's competition here