Enviva Inc.
Enviva Inc. (EVA) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (EVA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Paper, Lumber & Forest Products Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EVA | $0.42 | +0.00% | 31.3M | -0.04 | -$9.64 | N/A |
| SUZ | $9.07 | -0.33% | 11.2B | 4.18 | $2.17 | +2.34% |
| UFPI | $95.75 | -0.25% | 5.4B | 19.15 | $5.00 | +1.48% |
| LPX | $75.63 | -1.16% | 5.3B | 36.37 | $2.08 | +1.51% |
| WFG | $63.93 | -3.14% | 4.9B | -5.31 | -$12.08 | +1.99% |
| SLVM | $43.57 | +1.35% | 1.7B | 13.44 | $3.24 | +4.17% |
| RFP | $21.92 | -0.36% | 1.7B | 18.96 | $1.16 | N/A |
| SWM | $23.41 | -6.21% | 1.3B | 10.79 | $2.17 | +7.52% |
| MATV | $9.74 | +1.30% | 534.1M | -1.55 | -$6.27 | +4.14% |
| CLW | $14.85 | +1.57% | 239.5M | -4.55 | -$3.28 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
EVA vs SUZ Comparison May 2026
EVA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EVA stands at 31.3M. In comparison, SUZ has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EVA is priced at $0.42, while SUZ trades at $9.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EVA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas SUZ's P/E ratio is 4.18. In terms of profitability, EVA's ROE is -6.19%, compared to SUZ's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, EVA is more volatile compared to SUZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EVA.Check SUZ's competition here
EVA vs UFPI Comparison May 2026
EVA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EVA stands at 31.3M. In comparison, UFPI has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EVA is priced at $0.42, while UFPI trades at $95.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EVA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas UFPI's P/E ratio is 19.15. In terms of profitability, EVA's ROE is -6.19%, compared to UFPI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EVA is more volatile compared to UFPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EVA.Check UFPI's competition here
EVA vs LPX Comparison May 2026
EVA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EVA stands at 31.3M. In comparison, LPX has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EVA is priced at $0.42, while LPX trades at $75.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EVA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas LPX's P/E ratio is 36.37. In terms of profitability, EVA's ROE is -6.19%, compared to LPX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EVA is more volatile compared to LPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EVA.Check LPX's competition here
EVA vs WFG Comparison May 2026
EVA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EVA stands at 31.3M. In comparison, WFG has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EVA is priced at $0.42, while WFG trades at $63.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EVA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas WFG's P/E ratio is -5.31. In terms of profitability, EVA's ROE is -6.19%, compared to WFG's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, EVA is less volatile compared to WFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EVA.Check WFG's competition here
EVA vs SLVM Comparison May 2026
EVA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EVA stands at 31.3M. In comparison, SLVM has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EVA is priced at $0.42, while SLVM trades at $43.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EVA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas SLVM's P/E ratio is 13.44. In terms of profitability, EVA's ROE is -6.19%, compared to SLVM's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, EVA is more volatile compared to SLVM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EVA.Check SLVM's competition here
EVA vs RFP Comparison May 2026
EVA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EVA stands at 31.3M. In comparison, RFP has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EVA is priced at $0.42, while RFP trades at $21.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EVA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas RFP's P/E ratio is 18.96. In terms of profitability, EVA's ROE is -6.19%, compared to RFP's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, EVA is more volatile compared to RFP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EVA.Check RFP's competition here
EVA vs SWM Comparison May 2026
EVA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EVA stands at 31.3M. In comparison, SWM has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EVA is priced at $0.42, while SWM trades at $23.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EVA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas SWM's P/E ratio is 10.79. In terms of profitability, EVA's ROE is -6.19%, compared to SWM's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, EVA is less volatile compared to SWM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EVA.Check SWM's competition here
EVA vs MATV Comparison May 2026
EVA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EVA stands at 31.3M. In comparison, MATV has a market cap of 534.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EVA is priced at $0.42, while MATV trades at $9.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EVA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas MATV's P/E ratio is -1.55. In terms of profitability, EVA's ROE is -6.19%, compared to MATV's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, EVA is more volatile compared to MATV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EVA.Check MATV's competition here
EVA vs CLW Comparison May 2026
EVA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EVA stands at 31.3M. In comparison, CLW has a market cap of 239.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EVA is priced at $0.42, while CLW trades at $14.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EVA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas CLW's P/E ratio is -4.55. In terms of profitability, EVA's ROE is -6.19%, compared to CLW's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EVA is less volatile compared to CLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EVA.Check CLW's competition here
EVA vs GLT Comparison May 2026
EVA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EVA stands at 31.3M. In comparison, GLT has a market cap of 73.7M. Regarding current trading prices, EVA is priced at $0.42, while GLT trades at $21.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EVA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas GLT's P/E ratio is -1.04. In terms of profitability, EVA's ROE is -6.19%, compared to GLT's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, EVA is more volatile compared to GLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EVA.Check GLT's competition here
EVA vs MERC Comparison May 2026
EVA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EVA stands at 31.3M. In comparison, MERC has a market cap of 72.3M. Regarding current trading prices, EVA is priced at $0.42, while MERC trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EVA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas MERC's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, EVA's ROE is -6.19%, compared to MERC's ROE of -1.52%. Regarding short-term risk, EVA is less volatile compared to MERC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EVA.Check MERC's competition here
EVA vs JCTCF Comparison May 2026
EVA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EVA stands at 31.3M. In comparison, JCTCF has a market cap of 17.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EVA is priced at $0.42, while JCTCF trades at $4.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EVA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas JCTCF's P/E ratio is 14.38. In terms of profitability, EVA's ROE is -6.19%, compared to JCTCF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EVA is more volatile compared to JCTCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EVA.Check JCTCF's competition here
EVA vs NWGL Comparison May 2026
EVA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EVA stands at 31.3M. In comparison, NWGL has a market cap of 16.3M. Regarding current trading prices, EVA is priced at $0.42, while NWGL trades at $0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EVA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas NWGL's P/E ratio is -1.64. In terms of profitability, EVA's ROE is -6.19%, compared to NWGL's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, EVA is less volatile compared to NWGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EVA.Check NWGL's competition here
EVA vs JCTC Comparison May 2026
EVA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EVA stands at 31.3M. In comparison, JCTC has a market cap of 7M. Regarding current trading prices, EVA is priced at $0.42, while JCTC trades at $1.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EVA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas JCTC's P/E ratio is -0.86. In terms of profitability, EVA's ROE is -6.19%, compared to JCTC's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, EVA is more volatile compared to JCTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EVA.Check JCTC's competition here
EVA vs ITP Comparison May 2026
EVA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EVA stands at 31.3M. In comparison, ITP has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EVA is priced at $0.42, while ITP trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EVA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas ITP's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, EVA's ROE is -6.19%, compared to ITP's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EVA is more volatile compared to ITP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EVA.Check ITP's competition here
EVA vs UFS Comparison May 2026
EVA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EVA stands at 31.3M. In comparison, UFS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EVA is priced at $0.42, while UFS trades at $55.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EVA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas UFS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EVA's ROE is -6.19%, compared to UFS's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, EVA is more volatile compared to UFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EVA.Check UFS's competition here
EVA vs DEL Comparison May 2026
EVA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EVA stands at 31.3M. In comparison, DEL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EVA is priced at $0.42, while DEL trades at $93.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EVA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas DEL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EVA's ROE is -6.19%, compared to DEL's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EVA is less volatile compared to DEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EVA.Check DEL's competition here
EVA vs VRS Comparison May 2026
EVA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EVA stands at 31.3M. In comparison, VRS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EVA is priced at $0.42, while VRS trades at $26.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EVA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas VRS's P/E ratio is -278.25. In terms of profitability, EVA's ROE is -6.19%, compared to VRS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EVA is more volatile compared to VRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EVA.Check VRS's competition here
EVA vs KS Comparison May 2026
EVA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EVA stands at 31.3M. In comparison, KS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EVA is priced at $0.42, while KS trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EVA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas KS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EVA's ROE is -6.19%, compared to KS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, EVA is more volatile compared to KS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EVA.Check KS's competition here
EVA vs AEPI Comparison May 2026
EVA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EVA stands at 31.3M. In comparison, AEPI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EVA is priced at $0.42, while AEPI trades at $109.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EVA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas AEPI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EVA's ROE is -6.19%, compared to AEPI's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, EVA is more volatile compared to AEPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EVA.Check AEPI's competition here