Clearwater Paper Corporation (CLW) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CLW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Paper, Lumber & Forest Products Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLW | $17.68 | +7.15% | 285.4M | -4.76 | -$3.72 | N/A |
| WY | $24.85 | +3.24% | 17.8B | 44.02 | $0.56 | +3.35% |
| SUZ | $8.23 | +0.98% | 10.2B | 4.65 | $1.77 | +2.58% |
| LPX | $75.04 | +0.37% | 5.2B | 64.17 | $1.17 | +1.53% |
| WFG | $69.04 | +6.33% | 5.1B | -4.47 | -$14.94 | +1.85% |
| UFPI | $84.56 | +0.14% | 4.8B | 18.42 | $4.59 | +1.66% |
| RFP | $21.92 | -0.36% | 1.7B | 18.96 | $1.16 | N/A |
| SLVM | $41.61 | +0.02% | 1.7B | 16.59 | $2.51 | +4.31% |
| SWM | $23.41 | -6.21% | 1.3B | 10.79 | $2.17 | +7.52% |
| MATV | $8.13 | +2.52% | 447.6M | 5.76 | $1.41 | +4.91% |
Stock Comparison
CLW vs WY Comparison June 2026
CLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLW stands at 285.4M. In comparison, WY has a market cap of 17.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CLW is priced at $17.68, while WY trades at $24.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLW currently has a P/E ratio of -4.76, whereas WY's P/E ratio is 44.02. In terms of profitability, CLW's ROE is -0.03%, compared to WY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CLW is more volatile compared to WY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLW.Check WY's competition here
CLW vs SUZ Comparison June 2026
CLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLW stands at 285.4M. In comparison, SUZ has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CLW is priced at $17.68, while SUZ trades at $8.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLW currently has a P/E ratio of -4.76, whereas SUZ's P/E ratio is 4.65. In terms of profitability, CLW's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SUZ's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CLW is more volatile compared to SUZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLW.Check SUZ's competition here
CLW vs LPX Comparison June 2026
CLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLW stands at 285.4M. In comparison, LPX has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CLW is priced at $17.68, while LPX trades at $75.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLW currently has a P/E ratio of -4.76, whereas LPX's P/E ratio is 64.17. In terms of profitability, CLW's ROE is -0.03%, compared to LPX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CLW is more volatile compared to LPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLW.Check LPX's competition here
CLW vs WFG Comparison June 2026
CLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLW stands at 285.4M. In comparison, WFG has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CLW is priced at $17.68, while WFG trades at $69.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLW currently has a P/E ratio of -4.76, whereas WFG's P/E ratio is -4.47. In terms of profitability, CLW's ROE is -0.03%, compared to WFG's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CLW is more volatile compared to WFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLW.Check WFG's competition here
CLW vs UFPI Comparison June 2026
CLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLW stands at 285.4M. In comparison, UFPI has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CLW is priced at $17.68, while UFPI trades at $84.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLW currently has a P/E ratio of -4.76, whereas UFPI's P/E ratio is 18.42. In terms of profitability, CLW's ROE is -0.03%, compared to UFPI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CLW is more volatile compared to UFPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLW.Check UFPI's competition here
CLW vs RFP Comparison June 2026
CLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLW stands at 285.4M. In comparison, RFP has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CLW is priced at $17.68, while RFP trades at $21.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLW currently has a P/E ratio of -4.76, whereas RFP's P/E ratio is 18.96. In terms of profitability, CLW's ROE is -0.03%, compared to RFP's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CLW is more volatile compared to RFP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLW.Check RFP's competition here
CLW vs SLVM Comparison June 2026
CLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLW stands at 285.4M. In comparison, SLVM has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CLW is priced at $17.68, while SLVM trades at $41.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLW currently has a P/E ratio of -4.76, whereas SLVM's P/E ratio is 16.59. In terms of profitability, CLW's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SLVM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CLW is more volatile compared to SLVM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLW.Check SLVM's competition here
CLW vs SWM Comparison June 2026
CLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLW stands at 285.4M. In comparison, SWM has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CLW is priced at $17.68, while SWM trades at $23.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLW currently has a P/E ratio of -4.76, whereas SWM's P/E ratio is 10.79. In terms of profitability, CLW's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SWM's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CLW is less volatile compared to SWM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLW.Check SWM's competition here
CLW vs MATV Comparison June 2026
CLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLW stands at 285.4M. In comparison, MATV has a market cap of 447.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CLW is priced at $17.68, while MATV trades at $8.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLW currently has a P/E ratio of -4.76, whereas MATV's P/E ratio is 5.76. In terms of profitability, CLW's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MATV's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CLW is more volatile compared to MATV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLW.Check MATV's competition here
CLW vs GLT Comparison June 2026
CLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLW stands at 285.4M. In comparison, GLT has a market cap of 73.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CLW is priced at $17.68, while GLT trades at $21.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLW currently has a P/E ratio of -4.76, whereas GLT's P/E ratio is -1.04. In terms of profitability, CLW's ROE is -0.03%, compared to GLT's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CLW is more volatile compared to GLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLW.Check GLT's competition here
CLW vs MERC Comparison June 2026
CLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLW stands at 285.4M. In comparison, MERC has a market cap of 61M. Regarding current trading prices, CLW is priced at $17.68, while MERC trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLW currently has a P/E ratio of -4.76, whereas MERC's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, CLW's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MERC's ROE of -2.43%. Regarding short-term risk, CLW is less volatile compared to MERC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLW.Check MERC's competition here
CLW vs EVA Comparison June 2026
CLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLW stands at 285.4M. In comparison, EVA has a market cap of 31.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLW is priced at $17.68, while EVA trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLW currently has a P/E ratio of -4.76, whereas EVA's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, CLW's ROE is -0.03%, compared to EVA's ROE of -6.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CLW is more volatile compared to EVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLW.Check EVA's competition here
CLW vs JCTCF Comparison June 2026
CLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLW stands at 285.4M. In comparison, JCTCF has a market cap of 17.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CLW is priced at $17.68, while JCTCF trades at $4.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLW currently has a P/E ratio of -4.76, whereas JCTCF's P/E ratio is 14.38. In terms of profitability, CLW's ROE is -0.03%, compared to JCTCF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CLW is more volatile compared to JCTCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLW.Check JCTCF's competition here
CLW vs NWGL Comparison June 2026
CLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLW stands at 285.4M. In comparison, NWGL has a market cap of 8.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CLW is priced at $17.68, while NWGL trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLW currently has a P/E ratio of -4.76, whereas NWGL's P/E ratio is -1.24. In terms of profitability, CLW's ROE is -0.03%, compared to NWGL's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, CLW is less volatile compared to NWGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLW.Check NWGL's competition here
CLW vs JCTC Comparison June 2026
CLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLW stands at 285.4M. In comparison, JCTC has a market cap of 7.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CLW is priced at $17.68, while JCTC trades at $2.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLW currently has a P/E ratio of -4.76, whereas JCTC's P/E ratio is -0.92. In terms of profitability, CLW's ROE is -0.03%, compared to JCTC's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, CLW is less volatile compared to JCTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLW.Check JCTC's competition here
CLW vs ITP Comparison June 2026
CLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLW stands at 285.4M. In comparison, ITP has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CLW is priced at $17.68, while ITP trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLW currently has a P/E ratio of -4.76, whereas ITP's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, CLW's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ITP's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CLW is less volatile compared to ITP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLW.Check ITP's competition here
CLW vs VRS Comparison June 2026
CLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLW stands at 285.4M. In comparison, VRS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CLW is priced at $17.68, while VRS trades at $26.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLW currently has a P/E ratio of -4.76, whereas VRS's P/E ratio is -278.25. In terms of profitability, CLW's ROE is -0.03%, compared to VRS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CLW is more volatile compared to VRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLW.Check VRS's competition here
CLW vs UFS Comparison June 2026
CLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLW stands at 285.4M. In comparison, UFS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CLW is priced at $17.68, while UFS trades at $55.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLW currently has a P/E ratio of -4.76, whereas UFS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLW's ROE is -0.03%, compared to UFS's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CLW is more volatile compared to UFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLW.Check UFS's competition here
CLW vs DEL Comparison June 2026
CLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLW stands at 285.4M. In comparison, DEL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CLW is priced at $17.68, while DEL trades at $93.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLW currently has a P/E ratio of -4.76, whereas DEL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLW's ROE is -0.03%, compared to DEL's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CLW is more volatile compared to DEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLW.Check DEL's competition here
CLW vs KS Comparison June 2026
CLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLW stands at 285.4M. In comparison, KS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CLW is priced at $17.68, while KS trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLW currently has a P/E ratio of -4.76, whereas KS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLW's ROE is -0.03%, compared to KS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CLW is more volatile compared to KS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLW.Check KS's competition here
CLW vs AEPI Comparison June 2026
CLW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLW stands at 285.4M. In comparison, AEPI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CLW is priced at $17.68, while AEPI trades at $109.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLW currently has a P/E ratio of -4.76, whereas AEPI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLW's ROE is -0.03%, compared to AEPI's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CLW is more volatile compared to AEPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLW.Check AEPI's competition here