Schweitzer-Mauduit International, Inc. (NYSE: SWM) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

Schweitzer-Mauduit International, Inc. (NYSE: SWM) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWM stands at 1.3B. In comparison, IP has a market cap of 21.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SWM is priced at $23.41 on the NYSE, while IP trades at $41.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWM currently has a P/E ratio of 10.79, whereas IP's P/E ratio is -252.28. In terms of profitability, SWM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to IP's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SWM is more volatile compared to IP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWM.Check IP's competition here

Schweitzer-Mauduit International, Inc. (NYSE: SWM) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWM stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SUZ has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SWM is priced at $23.41 on the NYSE, while SUZ trades at $8.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWM currently has a P/E ratio of 10.79, whereas SUZ's P/E ratio is 5.07. In terms of profitability, SWM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SUZ's ROE of +38.74%. Regarding short-term risk, SWM is more volatile compared to SUZ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWM.Check SUZ's competition here

Schweitzer-Mauduit International, Inc. (NYSE: SWM) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWM stands at 1.3B. In comparison, WFG has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SWM is priced at $23.41 on the NYSE, while WFG trades at $69.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWM currently has a P/E ratio of 10.79, whereas WFG's P/E ratio is -8.81. In terms of profitability, SWM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to WFG's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SWM is more volatile compared to WFG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWM.Check WFG's competition here

Schweitzer-Mauduit International, Inc. (NYSE: SWM) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWM stands at 1.3B. In comparison, LPX has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SWM is priced at $23.41 on the NYSE, while LPX trades at $73.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWM currently has a P/E ratio of 10.79, whereas LPX's P/E ratio is 63.03. In terms of profitability, SWM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to LPX's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SWM is more volatile compared to LPX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWM.Check LPX's competition here

Schweitzer-Mauduit International, Inc. (NYSE: SWM) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWM stands at 1.3B. In comparison, UFPI has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, SWM is priced at $23.41 on the NYSE, while UFPI trades at $88.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWM currently has a P/E ratio of 10.79, whereas UFPI's P/E ratio is 19.24. In terms of profitability, SWM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to UFPI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SWM is more volatile compared to UFPI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWM.Check UFPI's competition here

Schweitzer-Mauduit International, Inc. (NYSE: SWM) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWM stands at 1.3B. In comparison, BCC has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SWM is priced at $23.41 on the NYSE, while BCC trades at $83.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWM currently has a P/E ratio of 10.79, whereas BCC's P/E ratio is 26.28. In terms of profitability, SWM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BCC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SWM is more volatile compared to BCC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWM.Check BCC's competition here

Schweitzer-Mauduit International, Inc. (NYSE: SWM) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWM stands at 1.3B. In comparison, RFP has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SWM is priced at $23.41 on the NYSE, while RFP trades at $21.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWM currently has a P/E ratio of 10.79, whereas RFP's P/E ratio is 18.96. In terms of profitability, SWM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to RFP's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SWM is more volatile compared to RFP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWM.Check RFP's competition here

Schweitzer-Mauduit International, Inc. (NYSE: SWM) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWM stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SLVM has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SWM is priced at $23.41 on the NYSE, while SLVM trades at $36.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWM currently has a P/E ratio of 10.79, whereas SLVM's P/E ratio is 15.56. In terms of profitability, SWM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SLVM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SWM is more volatile compared to SLVM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWM.Check SLVM's competition here

Schweitzer-Mauduit International, Inc. (NYSE: SWM) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWM stands at 1.3B. In comparison, MATV has a market cap of 661.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SWM is priced at $23.41 on the NYSE, while MATV trades at $12.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWM currently has a P/E ratio of 10.79, whereas MATV's P/E ratio is 10.91. In terms of profitability, SWM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MATV's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SWM is more volatile compared to MATV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWM.Check MATV's competition here

Schweitzer-Mauduit International, Inc. (NYSE: SWM) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWM stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CLW has a market cap of 349.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SWM is priced at $23.41 on the NYSE, while CLW trades at $21.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWM currently has a P/E ratio of 10.79, whereas CLW's P/E ratio is -10.84. In terms of profitability, SWM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CLW's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SWM is more volatile compared to CLW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWM.Check CLW's competition here

Schweitzer-Mauduit International, Inc. (NYSE: SWM) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWM stands at 1.3B. In comparison, GLT has a market cap of 73.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SWM is priced at $23.41 on the NYSE, while GLT trades at $21.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWM currently has a P/E ratio of 10.79, whereas GLT's P/E ratio is -1.04. In terms of profitability, SWM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GLT's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SWM is more volatile compared to GLT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWM.Check GLT's competition here

Schweitzer-Mauduit International, Inc. (NYSE: SWM) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWM stands at 1.3B. In comparison, EVA has a market cap of 31.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SWM is priced at $23.41 on the NYSE, while EVA trades at $0.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWM currently has a P/E ratio of 10.79, whereas EVA's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, SWM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to EVA's ROE of -6.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SWM is more volatile compared to EVA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWM.Check EVA's competition here

Schweitzer-Mauduit International, Inc. (NYSE: SWM) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWM stands at 1.3B. In comparison, MERC has a market cap of 28.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SWM is priced at $23.41 on the NYSE, while MERC trades at $0.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWM currently has a P/E ratio of 10.79, whereas MERC's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, SWM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MERC's ROE of -6.39%. Regarding short-term risk, SWM is more volatile compared to MERC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWM.Check MERC's competition here

Schweitzer-Mauduit International, Inc. (NYSE: SWM) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWM stands at 1.3B. In comparison, JCTCF has a market cap of 17.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SWM is priced at $23.41 on the NYSE, while JCTCF trades at $4.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWM currently has a P/E ratio of 10.79, whereas JCTCF's P/E ratio is 14.38. In terms of profitability, SWM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to JCTCF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SWM is more volatile compared to JCTCF. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWM.Check JCTCF's competition here

Schweitzer-Mauduit International, Inc. (NYSE: SWM) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWM stands at 1.3B. In comparison, JCTC has a market cap of 10.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SWM is priced at $23.41 on the NYSE, while JCTC trades at $2.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWM currently has a P/E ratio of 10.79, whereas JCTC's P/E ratio is -1.56. In terms of profitability, SWM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to JCTC's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, SWM is more volatile compared to JCTC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWM.Check JCTC's competition here

Schweitzer-Mauduit International, Inc. (NYSE: SWM) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWM stands at 1.3B. In comparison, NWGL has a market cap of 9.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SWM is priced at $23.41 on the NYSE, while NWGL trades at $0.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWM currently has a P/E ratio of 10.79, whereas NWGL's P/E ratio is -1.62. In terms of profitability, SWM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NWGL's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, SWM is less volatile compared to NWGL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWM.Check NWGL's competition here

Schweitzer-Mauduit International, Inc. (NYSE: SWM) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWM stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ITP has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SWM is priced at $23.41 on the NYSE, while ITP trades at $0.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWM currently has a P/E ratio of 10.79, whereas ITP's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, SWM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ITP's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SWM is more volatile compared to ITP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWM.Check ITP's competition here

Schweitzer-Mauduit International, Inc. (NYSE: SWM) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWM stands at 1.3B. In comparison, VRS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SWM is priced at $23.41 on the NYSE, while VRS trades at $26.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWM currently has a P/E ratio of 10.79, whereas VRS's P/E ratio is -278.25. In terms of profitability, SWM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to VRS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SWM is more volatile compared to VRS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWM.Check VRS's competition here

Schweitzer-Mauduit International, Inc. (NYSE: SWM) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWM stands at 1.3B. In comparison, KS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SWM is priced at $23.41 on the NYSE, while KS trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWM currently has a P/E ratio of 10.79, whereas KS's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, SWM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to KS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SWM is more volatile compared to KS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWM.Check KS's competition here

Schweitzer-Mauduit International, Inc. (NYSE: SWM) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWM stands at 1.3B. In comparison, AEPI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SWM is priced at $23.41 on the NYSE, while AEPI trades at $109.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWM currently has a P/E ratio of 10.79, whereas AEPI's P/E ratio is 19.46. In terms of profitability, SWM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AEPI's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SWM is more volatile compared to AEPI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWM.Check AEPI's competition here

Schweitzer-Mauduit International, Inc. (NYSE: SWM) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWM stands at 1.3B. In comparison, UFS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SWM is priced at $23.41 on the NYSE, while UFS trades at $55.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWM currently has a P/E ratio of 10.79, whereas UFS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SWM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to UFS's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, SWM is more volatile compared to UFS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWM.Check UFS's competition here

Schweitzer-Mauduit International, Inc. (NYSE: SWM) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SWM stands at 1.3B. In comparison, DEL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SWM is priced at $23.41 on the NYSE, while DEL trades at $93.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SWM currently has a P/E ratio of 10.79, whereas DEL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SWM's ROE is +0.19%, compared to DEL's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SWM is more volatile compared to DEL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWM.Check DEL's competition here