Mercer International Inc.
Mercer International Inc. (MERC) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (MERC) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Paper, Lumber & Forest Products Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MERC | $1.15 | +2.68% | 77M | -0.15 | -$7.44 | +6.44% |
| SUZ | $8.71 | -1.80% | 10.8B | 4.73 | $1.84 | +2.43% |
| LPX | $71.26 | -1.29% | 5B | 34.25 | $2.08 | +1.60% |
| UFPI | $85.18 | -4.82% | 4.8B | 18.56 | $4.59 | +1.65% |
| WFG | $62.39 | -1.45% | 4.7B | -4.18 | -$14.94 | +2.04% |
| SLVM | $43.65 | +2.15% | 1.7B | 13.47 | $3.24 | +4.09% |
| RFP | $21.92 | -0.36% | 1.7B | 18.96 | $1.16 | N/A |
| SWM | $23.41 | -6.21% | 1.3B | 10.79 | $2.17 | +7.52% |
| MATV | $9.39 | +1.19% | 514.7M | -1.52 | -$6.19 | +4.30% |
| CLW | $13.32 | -2.84% | 215.4M | -3.59 | -$3.72 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
MERC vs SUZ Comparison May 2026
MERC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MERC stands at 77M. In comparison, SUZ has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MERC is priced at $1.15, while SUZ trades at $8.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MERC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas SUZ's P/E ratio is 4.73. In terms of profitability, MERC's ROE is -1.52%, compared to SUZ's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MERC is more volatile compared to SUZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MERC.Check SUZ's competition here
MERC vs LPX Comparison May 2026
MERC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MERC stands at 77M. In comparison, LPX has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, MERC is priced at $1.15, while LPX trades at $71.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MERC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas LPX's P/E ratio is 34.25. In terms of profitability, MERC's ROE is -1.52%, compared to LPX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MERC is more volatile compared to LPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MERC.Check LPX's competition here
MERC vs UFPI Comparison May 2026
MERC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MERC stands at 77M. In comparison, UFPI has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MERC is priced at $1.15, while UFPI trades at $85.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MERC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas UFPI's P/E ratio is 18.56. In terms of profitability, MERC's ROE is -1.52%, compared to UFPI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MERC is less volatile compared to UFPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MERC.Check UFPI's competition here
MERC vs WFG Comparison May 2026
MERC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MERC stands at 77M. In comparison, WFG has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MERC is priced at $1.15, while WFG trades at $62.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MERC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas WFG's P/E ratio is -4.18. In terms of profitability, MERC's ROE is -1.52%, compared to WFG's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MERC is more volatile compared to WFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MERC.Check WFG's competition here
MERC vs SLVM Comparison May 2026
MERC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MERC stands at 77M. In comparison, SLVM has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MERC is priced at $1.15, while SLVM trades at $43.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MERC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas SLVM's P/E ratio is 13.47. In terms of profitability, MERC's ROE is -1.52%, compared to SLVM's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MERC is more volatile compared to SLVM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MERC.Check SLVM's competition here
MERC vs RFP Comparison May 2026
MERC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MERC stands at 77M. In comparison, RFP has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MERC is priced at $1.15, while RFP trades at $21.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MERC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas RFP's P/E ratio is 18.96. In terms of profitability, MERC's ROE is -1.52%, compared to RFP's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MERC is more volatile compared to RFP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MERC.Check RFP's competition here
MERC vs SWM Comparison May 2026
MERC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MERC stands at 77M. In comparison, SWM has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MERC is priced at $1.15, while SWM trades at $23.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MERC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas SWM's P/E ratio is 10.79. In terms of profitability, MERC's ROE is -1.52%, compared to SWM's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, MERC is less volatile compared to SWM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MERC.Check SWM's competition here
MERC vs MATV Comparison May 2026
MERC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MERC stands at 77M. In comparison, MATV has a market cap of 514.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MERC is priced at $1.15, while MATV trades at $9.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MERC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas MATV's P/E ratio is -1.52. In terms of profitability, MERC's ROE is -1.52%, compared to MATV's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, MERC is more volatile compared to MATV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MERC.Check MATV's competition here
MERC vs CLW Comparison May 2026
MERC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MERC stands at 77M. In comparison, CLW has a market cap of 215.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MERC is priced at $1.15, while CLW trades at $13.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MERC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas CLW's P/E ratio is -3.59. In terms of profitability, MERC's ROE is -1.52%, compared to CLW's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MERC is less volatile compared to CLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MERC.Check CLW's competition here
MERC vs GLT Comparison May 2026
MERC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MERC stands at 77M. In comparison, GLT has a market cap of 73.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MERC is priced at $1.15, while GLT trades at $21.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MERC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas GLT's P/E ratio is -1.04. In terms of profitability, MERC's ROE is -1.52%, compared to GLT's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MERC is more volatile compared to GLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MERC.Check GLT's competition here
MERC vs EVA Comparison May 2026
MERC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MERC stands at 77M. In comparison, EVA has a market cap of 31.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MERC is priced at $1.15, while EVA trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MERC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas EVA's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, MERC's ROE is -1.52%, compared to EVA's ROE of -6.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MERC is more volatile compared to EVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MERC.Check EVA's competition here
MERC vs JCTCF Comparison May 2026
MERC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MERC stands at 77M. In comparison, JCTCF has a market cap of 17.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MERC is priced at $1.15, while JCTCF trades at $4.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MERC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas JCTCF's P/E ratio is 14.38. In terms of profitability, MERC's ROE is -1.52%, compared to JCTCF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MERC is more volatile compared to JCTCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MERC.Check JCTCF's competition here
MERC vs NWGL Comparison May 2026
MERC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MERC stands at 77M. In comparison, NWGL has a market cap of 15.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MERC is priced at $1.15, while NWGL trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MERC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas NWGL's P/E ratio is -2.40. In terms of profitability, MERC's ROE is -1.52%, compared to NWGL's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, MERC is less volatile compared to NWGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MERC.Check NWGL's competition here
MERC vs JCTC Comparison May 2026
MERC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MERC stands at 77M. In comparison, JCTC has a market cap of 7M. Regarding current trading prices, MERC is priced at $1.15, while JCTC trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MERC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas JCTC's P/E ratio is -0.87. In terms of profitability, MERC's ROE is -1.52%, compared to JCTC's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, MERC is more volatile compared to JCTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MERC.Check JCTC's competition here
MERC vs ITP Comparison May 2026
MERC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MERC stands at 77M. In comparison, ITP has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MERC is priced at $1.15, while ITP trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MERC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas ITP's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, MERC's ROE is -1.52%, compared to ITP's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MERC is less volatile compared to ITP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MERC.Check ITP's competition here
MERC vs AEPI Comparison May 2026
MERC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MERC stands at 77M. In comparison, AEPI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MERC is priced at $1.15, while AEPI trades at $109.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MERC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas AEPI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MERC's ROE is -1.52%, compared to AEPI's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MERC is more volatile compared to AEPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MERC.Check AEPI's competition here
MERC vs KS Comparison May 2026
MERC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MERC stands at 77M. In comparison, KS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MERC is priced at $1.15, while KS trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MERC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas KS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MERC's ROE is -1.52%, compared to KS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MERC is more volatile compared to KS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MERC.Check KS's competition here
MERC vs VRS Comparison May 2026
MERC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MERC stands at 77M. In comparison, VRS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MERC is priced at $1.15, while VRS trades at $26.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MERC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas VRS's P/E ratio is -278.25. In terms of profitability, MERC's ROE is -1.52%, compared to VRS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MERC is more volatile compared to VRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MERC.Check VRS's competition here
MERC vs DEL Comparison May 2026
MERC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MERC stands at 77M. In comparison, DEL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MERC is priced at $1.15, while DEL trades at $93.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MERC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas DEL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MERC's ROE is -1.52%, compared to DEL's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MERC is less volatile compared to DEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MERC.Check DEL's competition here
MERC vs UFS Comparison May 2026
MERC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MERC stands at 77M. In comparison, UFS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MERC is priced at $1.15, while UFS trades at $55.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MERC currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas UFS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MERC's ROE is -1.52%, compared to UFS's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MERC is more volatile compared to UFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MERC.Check UFS's competition here