KapStone Paper and Packaging Corporation
KapStone Paper and Packaging Corporation (KS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (KS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Paper, Lumber & Forest Products Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KS | $0.04 | +0.00% | 0 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| SUZ | $8.71 | -1.80% | 10.8B | 4.73 | $1.84 | +2.43% |
| LPX | $71.26 | -1.29% | 5B | 34.25 | $2.08 | +1.60% |
| UFPI | $85.18 | -4.82% | 4.8B | 18.56 | $4.59 | +1.65% |
| WFG | $62.39 | -1.45% | 4.7B | -4.18 | -$14.94 | +2.04% |
| SLVM | $43.65 | +2.15% | 1.7B | 13.47 | $3.24 | +4.09% |
| RFP | $21.92 | -0.36% | 1.7B | 18.96 | $1.16 | N/A |
| SWM | $23.41 | -6.21% | 1.3B | 10.79 | $2.17 | +7.52% |
| MATV | $9.39 | +1.19% | 514.7M | -1.52 | -$6.19 | +4.30% |
| CLW | $13.32 | -2.84% | 215.4M | -3.59 | -$3.72 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
KS vs SUZ Comparison May 2026
KS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KS stands at 0. In comparison, SUZ has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KS is priced at $0.04, while SUZ trades at $8.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SUZ's P/E ratio is 4.73. In terms of profitability, KS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SUZ's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, KS is less volatile compared to SUZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KS.Check SUZ's competition here
KS vs LPX Comparison May 2026
KS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KS stands at 0. In comparison, LPX has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, KS is priced at $0.04, while LPX trades at $71.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LPX's P/E ratio is 34.25. In terms of profitability, KS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to LPX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KS is less volatile compared to LPX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KS.Check LPX's competition here
KS vs UFPI Comparison May 2026
KS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KS stands at 0. In comparison, UFPI has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KS is priced at $0.04, while UFPI trades at $85.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UFPI's P/E ratio is 18.56. In terms of profitability, KS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to UFPI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KS is less volatile compared to UFPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KS.Check UFPI's competition here
KS vs WFG Comparison May 2026
KS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KS stands at 0. In comparison, WFG has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KS is priced at $0.04, while WFG trades at $62.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WFG's P/E ratio is -4.18. In terms of profitability, KS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to WFG's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KS is less volatile compared to WFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KS.Check WFG's competition here
KS vs SLVM Comparison May 2026
KS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KS stands at 0. In comparison, SLVM has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KS is priced at $0.04, while SLVM trades at $43.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SLVM's P/E ratio is 13.47. In terms of profitability, KS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SLVM's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KS is less volatile compared to SLVM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KS.Check SLVM's competition here
KS vs RFP Comparison May 2026
KS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KS stands at 0. In comparison, RFP has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KS is priced at $0.04, while RFP trades at $21.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RFP's P/E ratio is 18.96. In terms of profitability, KS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to RFP's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, KS is less volatile compared to RFP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KS.Check RFP's competition here
KS vs SWM Comparison May 2026
KS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KS stands at 0. In comparison, SWM has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KS is priced at $0.04, while SWM trades at $23.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SWM's P/E ratio is 10.79. In terms of profitability, KS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SWM's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, KS is less volatile compared to SWM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KS.Check SWM's competition here
KS vs MATV Comparison May 2026
KS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KS stands at 0. In comparison, MATV has a market cap of 514.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KS is priced at $0.04, while MATV trades at $9.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MATV's P/E ratio is -1.52. In terms of profitability, KS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to MATV's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, KS is less volatile compared to MATV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KS.Check MATV's competition here
KS vs CLW Comparison May 2026
KS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KS stands at 0. In comparison, CLW has a market cap of 215.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KS is priced at $0.04, while CLW trades at $13.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLW's P/E ratio is -3.59. In terms of profitability, KS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CLW's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KS is less volatile compared to CLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KS.Check CLW's competition here
KS vs MERC Comparison May 2026
KS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KS stands at 0. In comparison, MERC has a market cap of 77M. Regarding current trading prices, KS is priced at $0.04, while MERC trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MERC's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, KS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to MERC's ROE of -1.52%. Regarding short-term risk, KS is less volatile compared to MERC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KS.Check MERC's competition here
KS vs GLT Comparison May 2026
KS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KS stands at 0. In comparison, GLT has a market cap of 73.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KS is priced at $0.04, while GLT trades at $21.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLT's P/E ratio is -1.04. In terms of profitability, KS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to GLT's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KS and GLT have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GLT's competition here
KS vs EVA Comparison May 2026
KS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KS stands at 0. In comparison, EVA has a market cap of 31.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KS is priced at $0.04, while EVA trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EVA's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, KS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to EVA's ROE of -6.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KS is less volatile compared to EVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KS.Check EVA's competition here
KS vs JCTCF Comparison May 2026
KS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KS stands at 0. In comparison, JCTCF has a market cap of 17.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KS is priced at $0.04, while JCTCF trades at $4.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JCTCF's P/E ratio is 14.38. In terms of profitability, KS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to JCTCF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KS and JCTCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check JCTCF's competition here
KS vs NWGL Comparison May 2026
KS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KS stands at 0. In comparison, NWGL has a market cap of 15.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KS is priced at $0.04, while NWGL trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NWGL's P/E ratio is -2.40. In terms of profitability, KS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to NWGL's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, KS is less volatile compared to NWGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KS.Check NWGL's competition here
KS vs JCTC Comparison May 2026
KS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KS stands at 0. In comparison, JCTC has a market cap of 7M. Regarding current trading prices, KS is priced at $0.04, while JCTC trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JCTC's P/E ratio is -0.87. In terms of profitability, KS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to JCTC's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, KS is less volatile compared to JCTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KS.Check JCTC's competition here
KS vs ITP Comparison May 2026
KS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KS stands at 0. In comparison, ITP has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KS is priced at $0.04, while ITP trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ITP's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, KS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ITP's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KS is less volatile compared to ITP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KS.Check ITP's competition here
KS vs UFS Comparison May 2026
KS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KS stands at 0. In comparison, UFS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KS is priced at $0.04, while UFS trades at $55.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UFS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to UFS's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, KS is less volatile compared to UFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KS.Check UFS's competition here
KS vs DEL Comparison May 2026
KS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KS stands at 0. In comparison, DEL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KS is priced at $0.04, while DEL trades at $93.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DEL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to DEL's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KS is less volatile compared to DEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KS.Check DEL's competition here
KS vs VRS Comparison May 2026
KS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KS stands at 0. In comparison, VRS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KS is priced at $0.04, while VRS trades at $26.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VRS's P/E ratio is -278.25. In terms of profitability, KS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to VRS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KS is less volatile compared to VRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KS.Check VRS's competition here
KS vs AEPI Comparison May 2026
KS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KS stands at 0. In comparison, AEPI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KS is priced at $0.04, while AEPI trades at $109.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AEPI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to AEPI's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, KS is less volatile compared to AEPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KS.Check AEPI's competition here