Weyerhaeuser Company
Weyerhaeuser Company (WY) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (WY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Paper, Lumber & Forest Products Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WY | $23.66 | +0.60% | 17.1B | 42.25 | $0.56 | +3.55% |
| SUZ | $8.31 | -1.66% | 10.3B | 4.54 | $1.83 | +2.57% |
| LPX | $70.51 | +0.53% | 4.9B | 60.26 | $1.17 | +1.65% |
| WFG | $62.10 | +0.34% | 4.7B | -4.16 | -$14.94 | +2.06% |
| UFPI | $80.54 | -0.05% | 4.5B | 17.55 | $4.59 | +1.75% |
| RFP | $21.92 | -0.36% | 1.7B | 18.96 | $1.16 | N/A |
| SLVM | $38.10 | -0.18% | 1.5B | 15.18 | $2.51 | +4.72% |
| SWM | $23.41 | -6.21% | 1.3B | 10.79 | $2.17 | +7.52% |
| MATV | $8.74 | +1.98% | 481.7M | 6.20 | $1.41 | +4.58% |
| CLW | $14.08 | -1.05% | 227M | -3.78 | -$3.72 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
WY vs SUZ Comparison May 2026
WY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WY stands at 17.1B. In comparison, SUZ has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WY is priced at $23.66, while SUZ trades at $8.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WY currently has a P/E ratio of 42.25, whereas SUZ's P/E ratio is 4.54. In terms of profitability, WY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SUZ's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, WY is less volatile compared to SUZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WY.Check SUZ's competition here
WY vs LPX Comparison May 2026
WY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WY stands at 17.1B. In comparison, LPX has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WY is priced at $23.66, while LPX trades at $70.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WY currently has a P/E ratio of 42.25, whereas LPX's P/E ratio is 60.26. In terms of profitability, WY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LPX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WY is less volatile compared to LPX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WY.Check LPX's competition here
WY vs WFG Comparison May 2026
WY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WY stands at 17.1B. In comparison, WFG has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WY is priced at $23.66, while WFG trades at $62.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WY currently has a P/E ratio of 42.25, whereas WFG's P/E ratio is -4.16. In terms of profitability, WY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to WFG's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, WY is less volatile compared to WFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WY.Check WFG's competition here
WY vs UFPI Comparison May 2026
WY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WY stands at 17.1B. In comparison, UFPI has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WY is priced at $23.66, while UFPI trades at $80.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WY currently has a P/E ratio of 42.25, whereas UFPI's P/E ratio is 17.55. In terms of profitability, WY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to UFPI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WY is more volatile compared to UFPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WY.Check UFPI's competition here
WY vs RFP Comparison May 2026
WY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WY stands at 17.1B. In comparison, RFP has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WY is priced at $23.66, while RFP trades at $21.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WY currently has a P/E ratio of 42.25, whereas RFP's P/E ratio is 18.96. In terms of profitability, WY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to RFP's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, WY is more volatile compared to RFP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WY.Check RFP's competition here
WY vs SLVM Comparison May 2026
WY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WY stands at 17.1B. In comparison, SLVM has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WY is priced at $23.66, while SLVM trades at $38.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WY currently has a P/E ratio of 42.25, whereas SLVM's P/E ratio is 15.18. In terms of profitability, WY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SLVM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WY is less volatile compared to SLVM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WY.Check SLVM's competition here
WY vs SWM Comparison May 2026
WY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WY stands at 17.1B. In comparison, SWM has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WY is priced at $23.66, while SWM trades at $23.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WY currently has a P/E ratio of 42.25, whereas SWM's P/E ratio is 10.79. In terms of profitability, WY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SWM's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WY is less volatile compared to SWM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WY.Check SWM's competition here
WY vs MATV Comparison May 2026
WY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WY stands at 17.1B. In comparison, MATV has a market cap of 481.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WY is priced at $23.66, while MATV trades at $8.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WY currently has a P/E ratio of 42.25, whereas MATV's P/E ratio is 6.20. In terms of profitability, WY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MATV's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WY is less volatile compared to MATV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WY.Check MATV's competition here
WY vs CLW Comparison May 2026
WY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WY stands at 17.1B. In comparison, CLW has a market cap of 227M. Regarding current trading prices, WY is priced at $23.66, while CLW trades at $14.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WY currently has a P/E ratio of 42.25, whereas CLW's P/E ratio is -3.78. In terms of profitability, WY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CLW's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WY is less volatile compared to CLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WY.Check CLW's competition here
WY vs GLT Comparison May 2026
WY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WY stands at 17.1B. In comparison, GLT has a market cap of 73.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WY is priced at $23.66, while GLT trades at $21.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WY currently has a P/E ratio of 42.25, whereas GLT's P/E ratio is -1.04. In terms of profitability, WY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GLT's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WY is more volatile compared to GLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WY.Check GLT's competition here
WY vs MERC Comparison May 2026
WY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WY stands at 17.1B. In comparison, MERC has a market cap of 69.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WY is priced at $23.66, while MERC trades at $1.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WY currently has a P/E ratio of 42.25, whereas MERC's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, WY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MERC's ROE of -2.43%. Regarding short-term risk, WY is less volatile compared to MERC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WY.Check MERC's competition here
WY vs EVA Comparison May 2026
WY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WY stands at 17.1B. In comparison, EVA has a market cap of 31.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WY is priced at $23.66, while EVA trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WY currently has a P/E ratio of 42.25, whereas EVA's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, WY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to EVA's ROE of -6.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WY is less volatile compared to EVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WY.Check EVA's competition here
WY vs JCTCF Comparison May 2026
WY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WY stands at 17.1B. In comparison, JCTCF has a market cap of 17.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WY is priced at $23.66, while JCTCF trades at $4.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WY currently has a P/E ratio of 42.25, whereas JCTCF's P/E ratio is 14.38. In terms of profitability, WY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to JCTCF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WY is more volatile compared to JCTCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WY.Check JCTCF's competition here
WY vs NWGL Comparison May 2026
WY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WY stands at 17.1B. In comparison, NWGL has a market cap of 14.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WY is priced at $23.66, while NWGL trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WY currently has a P/E ratio of 42.25, whereas NWGL's P/E ratio is -2.16. In terms of profitability, WY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NWGL's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, WY is less volatile compared to NWGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WY.Check NWGL's competition here
WY vs JCTC Comparison May 2026
WY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WY stands at 17.1B. In comparison, JCTC has a market cap of 7.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WY is priced at $23.66, while JCTC trades at $2.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WY currently has a P/E ratio of 42.25, whereas JCTC's P/E ratio is -0.92. In terms of profitability, WY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to JCTC's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, WY is less volatile compared to JCTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WY.Check JCTC's competition here
WY vs ITP Comparison May 2026
WY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WY stands at 17.1B. In comparison, ITP has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WY is priced at $23.66, while ITP trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WY currently has a P/E ratio of 42.25, whereas ITP's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, WY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ITP's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WY is less volatile compared to ITP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WY.Check ITP's competition here
WY vs DEL Comparison May 2026
WY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WY stands at 17.1B. In comparison, DEL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WY is priced at $23.66, while DEL trades at $93.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WY currently has a P/E ratio of 42.25, whereas DEL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DEL's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WY is less volatile compared to DEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WY.Check DEL's competition here
WY vs AEPI Comparison May 2026
WY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WY stands at 17.1B. In comparison, AEPI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WY is priced at $23.66, while AEPI trades at $109.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WY currently has a P/E ratio of 42.25, whereas AEPI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AEPI's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, WY is more volatile compared to AEPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WY.Check AEPI's competition here
WY vs KS Comparison May 2026
WY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WY stands at 17.1B. In comparison, KS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WY is priced at $23.66, while KS trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WY currently has a P/E ratio of 42.25, whereas KS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to KS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, WY is more volatile compared to KS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WY.Check KS's competition here
WY vs UFS Comparison May 2026
WY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WY stands at 17.1B. In comparison, UFS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WY is priced at $23.66, while UFS trades at $55.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WY currently has a P/E ratio of 42.25, whereas UFS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to UFS's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, WY is more volatile compared to UFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WY.Check UFS's competition here
WY vs VRS Comparison May 2026
WY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WY stands at 17.1B. In comparison, VRS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WY is priced at $23.66, while VRS trades at $26.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WY currently has a P/E ratio of 42.25, whereas VRS's P/E ratio is -278.25. In terms of profitability, WY's ROE is +0.04%, compared to VRS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WY is more volatile compared to VRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WY.Check VRS's competition here