IT Tech Packaging, Inc. (ITP) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (ITP) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Paper, Lumber & Forest Products Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ITP | $0.19 | +1.06% | 3.2M | -0.21 | -$0.91 | N/A |
| WY | $24.32 | -0.04% | 17.5B | 43.45 | $0.56 | +3.44% |
| SUZ | $8.39 | +1.33% | 10.4B | 4.64 | $1.81 | +2.51% |
| LPX | $77.56 | +3.02% | 5.4B | 66.32 | $1.17 | +1.49% |
| WFG | $70.20 | -0.27% | 5.3B | -4.69 | -$14.94 | +1.82% |
| UFPI | $86.58 | +3.10% | 4.9B | 18.86 | $4.59 | +1.64% |
| RFP | $21.92 | -0.36% | 1.7B | 18.96 | $1.16 | N/A |
| SLVM | $39.66 | +0.18% | 1.6B | 15.80 | $2.51 | +4.48% |
| SWM | $23.41 | -6.21% | 1.3B | 10.79 | $2.17 | +7.52% |
| MATV | $7.92 | +1.54% | 437.6M | 5.63 | $1.41 | +5.02% |
Stock Comparison
ITP vs WY Comparison June 2026
ITP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITP stands at 3.2M. In comparison, WY has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ITP is priced at $0.19, while WY trades at $24.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas WY's P/E ratio is 43.45. In terms of profitability, ITP's ROE is -0.07%, compared to WY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ITP is more volatile compared to WY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITP.Check WY's competition here
ITP vs SUZ Comparison June 2026
ITP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITP stands at 3.2M. In comparison, SUZ has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ITP is priced at $0.19, while SUZ trades at $8.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas SUZ's P/E ratio is 4.64. In terms of profitability, ITP's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SUZ's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ITP is less volatile compared to SUZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITP.Check SUZ's competition here
ITP vs LPX Comparison June 2026
ITP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITP stands at 3.2M. In comparison, LPX has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ITP is priced at $0.19, while LPX trades at $77.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas LPX's P/E ratio is 66.32. In terms of profitability, ITP's ROE is -0.07%, compared to LPX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ITP is less volatile compared to LPX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITP.Check LPX's competition here
ITP vs WFG Comparison June 2026
ITP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITP stands at 3.2M. In comparison, WFG has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ITP is priced at $0.19, while WFG trades at $70.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas WFG's P/E ratio is -4.69. In terms of profitability, ITP's ROE is -0.07%, compared to WFG's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ITP is less volatile compared to WFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITP.Check WFG's competition here
ITP vs UFPI Comparison June 2026
ITP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITP stands at 3.2M. In comparison, UFPI has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ITP is priced at $0.19, while UFPI trades at $86.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas UFPI's P/E ratio is 18.86. In terms of profitability, ITP's ROE is -0.07%, compared to UFPI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ITP is less volatile compared to UFPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITP.Check UFPI's competition here
ITP vs RFP Comparison June 2026
ITP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITP stands at 3.2M. In comparison, RFP has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ITP is priced at $0.19, while RFP trades at $21.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas RFP's P/E ratio is 18.96. In terms of profitability, ITP's ROE is -0.07%, compared to RFP's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ITP is more volatile compared to RFP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITP.Check RFP's competition here
ITP vs SLVM Comparison June 2026
ITP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITP stands at 3.2M. In comparison, SLVM has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ITP is priced at $0.19, while SLVM trades at $39.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas SLVM's P/E ratio is 15.80. In terms of profitability, ITP's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SLVM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ITP is less volatile compared to SLVM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITP.Check SLVM's competition here
ITP vs SWM Comparison June 2026
ITP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITP stands at 3.2M. In comparison, SWM has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ITP is priced at $0.19, while SWM trades at $23.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas SWM's P/E ratio is 10.79. In terms of profitability, ITP's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SWM's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ITP is less volatile compared to SWM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITP.Check SWM's competition here
ITP vs MATV Comparison June 2026
ITP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITP stands at 3.2M. In comparison, MATV has a market cap of 437.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ITP is priced at $0.19, while MATV trades at $7.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas MATV's P/E ratio is 5.63. In terms of profitability, ITP's ROE is -0.07%, compared to MATV's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ITP is less volatile compared to MATV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITP.Check MATV's competition here
ITP vs CLW Comparison June 2026
ITP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITP stands at 3.2M. In comparison, CLW has a market cap of 270.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ITP is priced at $0.19, while CLW trades at $16.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas CLW's P/E ratio is -4.51. In terms of profitability, ITP's ROE is -0.07%, compared to CLW's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ITP is more volatile compared to CLW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITP.Check CLW's competition here
ITP vs GLT Comparison June 2026
ITP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITP stands at 3.2M. In comparison, GLT has a market cap of 73.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ITP is priced at $0.19, while GLT trades at $21.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas GLT's P/E ratio is -1.04. In terms of profitability, ITP's ROE is -0.07%, compared to GLT's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ITP is more volatile compared to GLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITP.Check GLT's competition here
ITP vs MERC Comparison June 2026
ITP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITP stands at 3.2M. In comparison, MERC has a market cap of 57.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ITP is priced at $0.19, while MERC trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas MERC's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, ITP's ROE is -0.07%, compared to MERC's ROE of -2.43%. Regarding short-term risk, ITP is less volatile compared to MERC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITP.Check MERC's competition here
ITP vs EVA Comparison June 2026
ITP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITP stands at 3.2M. In comparison, EVA has a market cap of 31.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ITP is priced at $0.19, while EVA trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas EVA's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, ITP's ROE is -0.07%, compared to EVA's ROE of -6.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ITP is less volatile compared to EVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITP.Check EVA's competition here
ITP vs JCTCF Comparison June 2026
ITP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITP stands at 3.2M. In comparison, JCTCF has a market cap of 17.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ITP is priced at $0.19, while JCTCF trades at $4.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas JCTCF's P/E ratio is 14.38. In terms of profitability, ITP's ROE is -0.07%, compared to JCTCF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ITP is more volatile compared to JCTCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITP.Check JCTCF's competition here
ITP vs JCTC Comparison June 2026
ITP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITP stands at 3.2M. In comparison, JCTC has a market cap of 7.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ITP is priced at $0.19, while JCTC trades at $2.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas JCTC's P/E ratio is -0.92. In terms of profitability, ITP's ROE is -0.07%, compared to JCTC's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, ITP is less volatile compared to JCTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITP.Check JCTC's competition here
ITP vs NWGL Comparison June 2026
ITP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITP stands at 3.2M. In comparison, NWGL has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ITP is priced at $0.19, while NWGL trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas NWGL's P/E ratio is -0.62. In terms of profitability, ITP's ROE is -0.07%, compared to NWGL's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, ITP is less volatile compared to NWGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITP.Check NWGL's competition here
ITP vs VRS Comparison June 2026
ITP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITP stands at 3.2M. In comparison, VRS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ITP is priced at $0.19, while VRS trades at $26.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas VRS's P/E ratio is -278.25. In terms of profitability, ITP's ROE is -0.07%, compared to VRS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ITP is more volatile compared to VRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITP.Check VRS's competition here
ITP vs UFS Comparison June 2026
ITP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITP stands at 3.2M. In comparison, UFS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ITP is priced at $0.19, while UFS trades at $55.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas UFS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ITP's ROE is -0.07%, compared to UFS's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, ITP is more volatile compared to UFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITP.Check UFS's competition here
ITP vs DEL Comparison June 2026
ITP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITP stands at 3.2M. In comparison, DEL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ITP is priced at $0.19, while DEL trades at $93.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas DEL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ITP's ROE is -0.07%, compared to DEL's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ITP is less volatile compared to DEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITP.Check DEL's competition here
ITP vs KS Comparison June 2026
ITP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITP stands at 3.2M. In comparison, KS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ITP is priced at $0.19, while KS trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas KS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ITP's ROE is -0.07%, compared to KS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ITP is more volatile compared to KS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITP.Check KS's competition here
ITP vs AEPI Comparison June 2026
ITP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITP stands at 3.2M. In comparison, AEPI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ITP is priced at $0.19, while AEPI trades at $109.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas AEPI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ITP's ROE is -0.07%, compared to AEPI's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ITP is more volatile compared to AEPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITP.Check AEPI's competition here