IT Tech Packaging, Inc.
IT Tech Packaging, Inc. (ITP) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (ITP) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Paper, Lumber & Forest Products Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ITP | $0.19 | +3.23% | 3.2M | -0.21 | -$0.91 | N/A |
| SUZ | $8.87 | -0.67% | 10.9B | 4.10 | $2.16 | +2.38% |
| UFPI | $89.49 | -3.71% | 5.1B | 17.90 | $5.00 | +1.56% |
| LPX | $72.19 | +0.14% | 5B | 34.72 | $2.08 | +1.58% |
| WFG | $63.31 | +0.30% | 4.8B | -5.25 | -$12.08 | +2.03% |
| SLVM | $42.73 | -1.43% | 1.7B | 13.20 | $3.24 | +4.14% |
| RFP | $21.92 | -0.36% | 1.7B | 18.96 | $1.16 | N/A |
| SWM | $23.41 | -6.21% | 1.3B | 10.79 | $2.17 | +7.52% |
| MATV | $9.28 | -1.69% | 508.1M | -1.50 | -$6.19 | +4.32% |
| CLW | $13.71 | +6.36% | 220.9M | -3.68 | -$3.72 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
ITP vs SUZ Comparison May 2026
ITP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITP stands at 3.2M. In comparison, SUZ has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ITP is priced at $0.19, while SUZ trades at $8.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas SUZ's P/E ratio is 4.10. In terms of profitability, ITP's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SUZ's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, ITP is more volatile compared to SUZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITP.Check SUZ's competition here
ITP vs UFPI Comparison May 2026
ITP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITP stands at 3.2M. In comparison, UFPI has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ITP is priced at $0.19, while UFPI trades at $89.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas UFPI's P/E ratio is 17.90. In terms of profitability, ITP's ROE is -0.07%, compared to UFPI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ITP is less volatile compared to UFPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITP.Check UFPI's competition here
ITP vs LPX Comparison May 2026
ITP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITP stands at 3.2M. In comparison, LPX has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, ITP is priced at $0.19, while LPX trades at $72.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas LPX's P/E ratio is 34.72. In terms of profitability, ITP's ROE is -0.07%, compared to LPX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ITP is more volatile compared to LPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITP.Check LPX's competition here
ITP vs WFG Comparison May 2026
ITP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITP stands at 3.2M. In comparison, WFG has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ITP is priced at $0.19, while WFG trades at $63.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas WFG's P/E ratio is -5.25. In terms of profitability, ITP's ROE is -0.07%, compared to WFG's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ITP is more volatile compared to WFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITP.Check WFG's competition here
ITP vs SLVM Comparison May 2026
ITP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITP stands at 3.2M. In comparison, SLVM has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ITP is priced at $0.19, while SLVM trades at $42.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas SLVM's P/E ratio is 13.20. In terms of profitability, ITP's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SLVM's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ITP is more volatile compared to SLVM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITP.Check SLVM's competition here
ITP vs RFP Comparison May 2026
ITP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITP stands at 3.2M. In comparison, RFP has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ITP is priced at $0.19, while RFP trades at $21.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas RFP's P/E ratio is 18.96. In terms of profitability, ITP's ROE is -0.07%, compared to RFP's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ITP is more volatile compared to RFP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITP.Check RFP's competition here
ITP vs SWM Comparison May 2026
ITP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITP stands at 3.2M. In comparison, SWM has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ITP is priced at $0.19, while SWM trades at $23.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas SWM's P/E ratio is 10.79. In terms of profitability, ITP's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SWM's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, ITP is less volatile compared to SWM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITP.Check SWM's competition here
ITP vs MATV Comparison May 2026
ITP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITP stands at 3.2M. In comparison, MATV has a market cap of 508.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ITP is priced at $0.19, while MATV trades at $9.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas MATV's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, ITP's ROE is -0.07%, compared to MATV's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, ITP is more volatile compared to MATV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITP.Check MATV's competition here
ITP vs CLW Comparison May 2026
ITP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITP stands at 3.2M. In comparison, CLW has a market cap of 220.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ITP is priced at $0.19, while CLW trades at $13.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas CLW's P/E ratio is -3.68. In terms of profitability, ITP's ROE is -0.07%, compared to CLW's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ITP is less volatile compared to CLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITP.Check CLW's competition here
ITP vs MERC Comparison May 2026
ITP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITP stands at 3.2M. In comparison, MERC has a market cap of 74.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ITP is priced at $0.19, while MERC trades at $1.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas MERC's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, ITP's ROE is -0.07%, compared to MERC's ROE of -1.52%. Regarding short-term risk, ITP is less volatile compared to MERC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITP.Check MERC's competition here
ITP vs GLT Comparison May 2026
ITP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITP stands at 3.2M. In comparison, GLT has a market cap of 73.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ITP is priced at $0.19, while GLT trades at $21.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas GLT's P/E ratio is -1.04. In terms of profitability, ITP's ROE is -0.07%, compared to GLT's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ITP is more volatile compared to GLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITP.Check GLT's competition here
ITP vs EVA Comparison May 2026
ITP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITP stands at 3.2M. In comparison, EVA has a market cap of 31.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ITP is priced at $0.19, while EVA trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas EVA's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, ITP's ROE is -0.07%, compared to EVA's ROE of -6.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ITP is more volatile compared to EVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITP.Check EVA's competition here
ITP vs JCTCF Comparison May 2026
ITP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITP stands at 3.2M. In comparison, JCTCF has a market cap of 17.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ITP is priced at $0.19, while JCTCF trades at $4.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas JCTCF's P/E ratio is 14.38. In terms of profitability, ITP's ROE is -0.07%, compared to JCTCF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ITP is more volatile compared to JCTCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITP.Check JCTCF's competition here
ITP vs NWGL Comparison May 2026
ITP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITP stands at 3.2M. In comparison, NWGL has a market cap of 15.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ITP is priced at $0.19, while NWGL trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas NWGL's P/E ratio is -2.30. In terms of profitability, ITP's ROE is -0.07%, compared to NWGL's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, ITP is less volatile compared to NWGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITP.Check NWGL's competition here
ITP vs JCTC Comparison May 2026
ITP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITP stands at 3.2M. In comparison, JCTC has a market cap of 6.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ITP is priced at $0.19, while JCTC trades at $1.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas JCTC's P/E ratio is -0.85. In terms of profitability, ITP's ROE is -0.07%, compared to JCTC's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, ITP is more volatile compared to JCTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITP.Check JCTC's competition here
ITP vs UFS Comparison May 2026
ITP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITP stands at 3.2M. In comparison, UFS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ITP is priced at $0.19, while UFS trades at $55.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas UFS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ITP's ROE is -0.07%, compared to UFS's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ITP is more volatile compared to UFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITP.Check UFS's competition here
ITP vs DEL Comparison May 2026
ITP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITP stands at 3.2M. In comparison, DEL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ITP is priced at $0.19, while DEL trades at $93.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas DEL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ITP's ROE is -0.07%, compared to DEL's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ITP is less volatile compared to DEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITP.Check DEL's competition here
ITP vs VRS Comparison May 2026
ITP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITP stands at 3.2M. In comparison, VRS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ITP is priced at $0.19, while VRS trades at $26.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas VRS's P/E ratio is -278.25. In terms of profitability, ITP's ROE is -0.07%, compared to VRS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ITP is more volatile compared to VRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITP.Check VRS's competition here
ITP vs KS Comparison May 2026
ITP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITP stands at 3.2M. In comparison, KS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ITP is priced at $0.19, while KS trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas KS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ITP's ROE is -0.07%, compared to KS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ITP is more volatile compared to KS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITP.Check KS's competition here
ITP vs AEPI Comparison May 2026
ITP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITP stands at 3.2M. In comparison, AEPI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ITP is priced at $0.19, while AEPI trades at $109.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITP currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas AEPI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ITP's ROE is -0.07%, compared to AEPI's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ITP is more volatile compared to AEPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITP.Check AEPI's competition here