Tile Shop Holdings, Inc.
Tile Shop Holdings, Inc. (TTSH) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (TTSH) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Home Improvement Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TTSH | $3.05 | -3.17% | 136.4M | -30.50 | -$0.10 | N/A |
| HD | $342.67 | +1.10% | 337.5B | 23.81 | $14.24 | +2.71% |
| LOW | $241.91 | +1.03% | 133.3B | 20.05 | $11.85 | +1.99% |
| FND | $57.26 | +2.76% | 6.2B | 29.70 | $1.92 | N/A |
| MLHR | $38.66 | +0.08% | 2.9B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| ARHS | $7.31 | +3.54% | 1B | 14.79 | $0.48 | N/A |
| HVT-A | $24.55 | +0.16% | 368.2M | 19.08 | $1.19 | +6.09% |
| HVT | $21.91 | +1.62% | 353.4M | 17.99 | $1.19 | +6.09% |
| EMPG | $17.36 | +0.00% | 143M | 192.89 | $0.09 | N/A |
| LIVE | $10.70 | -9.74% | 35M | 2.40 | $4.75 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
TTSH vs HD Comparison March 2026
TTSH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTSH stands at 136.4M. In comparison, HD has a market cap of 337.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TTSH is priced at $3.05, while HD trades at $342.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTSH currently has a P/E ratio of -30.50, whereas HD's P/E ratio is 23.81. In terms of profitability, TTSH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to HD's ROE of +1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TTSH is less volatile compared to HD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTSH.Check HD's competition here
TTSH vs LOW Comparison March 2026
TTSH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTSH stands at 136.4M. In comparison, LOW has a market cap of 133.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TTSH is priced at $3.05, while LOW trades at $241.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTSH currently has a P/E ratio of -30.50, whereas LOW's P/E ratio is 20.05. In terms of profitability, TTSH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to LOW's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, TTSH is less volatile compared to LOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTSH.Check LOW's competition here
TTSH vs FND Comparison March 2026
TTSH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTSH stands at 136.4M. In comparison, FND has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TTSH is priced at $3.05, while FND trades at $57.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTSH currently has a P/E ratio of -30.50, whereas FND's P/E ratio is 29.70. In terms of profitability, TTSH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to FND's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TTSH is less volatile compared to FND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTSH.Check FND's competition here
TTSH vs MLHR Comparison March 2026
TTSH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTSH stands at 136.4M. In comparison, MLHR has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TTSH is priced at $3.05, while MLHR trades at $38.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTSH currently has a P/E ratio of -30.50, whereas MLHR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TTSH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to MLHR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TTSH is less volatile compared to MLHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTSH.Check MLHR's competition here
TTSH vs ARHS Comparison March 2026
TTSH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTSH stands at 136.4M. In comparison, ARHS has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, TTSH is priced at $3.05, while ARHS trades at $7.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTSH currently has a P/E ratio of -30.50, whereas ARHS's P/E ratio is 14.79. In terms of profitability, TTSH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ARHS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TTSH is less volatile compared to ARHS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTSH.Check ARHS's competition here
TTSH vs HVT-A Comparison March 2026
TTSH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTSH stands at 136.4M. In comparison, HVT-A has a market cap of 368.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TTSH is priced at $3.05, while HVT-A trades at $24.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTSH currently has a P/E ratio of -30.50, whereas HVT-A's P/E ratio is 19.08. In terms of profitability, TTSH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to HVT-A's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TTSH is less volatile compared to HVT-A. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTSH.Check HVT-A's competition here
TTSH vs HVT Comparison March 2026
TTSH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTSH stands at 136.4M. In comparison, HVT has a market cap of 353.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TTSH is priced at $3.05, while HVT trades at $21.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTSH currently has a P/E ratio of -30.50, whereas HVT's P/E ratio is 17.99. In terms of profitability, TTSH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to HVT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TTSH is less volatile compared to HVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTSH.Check HVT's competition here
TTSH vs EMPG Comparison March 2026
TTSH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTSH stands at 136.4M. In comparison, EMPG has a market cap of 143M. Regarding current trading prices, TTSH is priced at $3.05, while EMPG trades at $17.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTSH currently has a P/E ratio of -30.50, whereas EMPG's P/E ratio is 192.89. In terms of profitability, TTSH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to EMPG's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, TTSH is more volatile compared to EMPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTSH.Check EMPG's competition here
TTSH vs LIVE Comparison March 2026
TTSH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTSH stands at 136.4M. In comparison, LIVE has a market cap of 35M. Regarding current trading prices, TTSH is priced at $3.05, while LIVE trades at $10.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTSH currently has a P/E ratio of -30.50, whereas LIVE's P/E ratio is 2.40. In terms of profitability, TTSH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to LIVE's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TTSH is less volatile compared to LIVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTSH.Check LIVE's competition here
TTSH vs PFAI Comparison March 2026
TTSH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTSH stands at 136.4M. In comparison, PFAI has a market cap of 28.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TTSH is priced at $3.05, while PFAI trades at $2.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTSH currently has a P/E ratio of -30.50, whereas PFAI's P/E ratio is -120.00. In terms of profitability, TTSH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to PFAI's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, TTSH is less volatile compared to PFAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTSH.Check PFAI's competition here
TTSH vs LL Comparison March 2026
TTSH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTSH stands at 136.4M. In comparison, LL has a market cap of 25.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TTSH is priced at $3.05, while LL trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTSH currently has a P/E ratio of -30.50, whereas LL's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, TTSH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to LL's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, TTSH is less volatile compared to LL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTSH.Check LL's competition here
TTSH vs LESL Comparison March 2026
TTSH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTSH stands at 136.4M. In comparison, LESL has a market cap of 11M. Regarding current trading prices, TTSH is priced at $3.05, while LESL trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTSH currently has a P/E ratio of -30.50, whereas LESL's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, TTSH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to LESL's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, TTSH is less volatile compared to LESL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTSH.Check LESL's competition here
TTSH vs CAA Comparison March 2026
TTSH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTSH stands at 136.4M. In comparison, CAA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TTSH is priced at $3.05, while CAA trades at $53.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTSH currently has a P/E ratio of -30.50, whereas CAA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TTSH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CAA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TTSH is less volatile compared to CAA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTSH.Check CAA's competition here
TTSH vs FLE Comparison March 2026
TTSH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTSH stands at 136.4M. In comparison, FLE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TTSH is priced at $3.05, while FLE trades at $15,400.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTSH currently has a P/E ratio of -30.50, whereas FLE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TTSH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to FLE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TTSH is more volatile compared to FLE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTSH.Check FLE's competition here
TTSH vs HBP Comparison March 2026
TTSH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTSH stands at 136.4M. In comparison, HBP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TTSH is priced at $3.05, while HBP trades at $10.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTSH currently has a P/E ratio of -30.50, whereas HBP's P/E ratio is 6.07. In terms of profitability, TTSH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to HBP's ROE of +0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, TTSH is more volatile compared to HBP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTSH.Check HBP's competition here