Tile Shop Holdings, Inc.

TTSH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTSH stands at 284.9M. In comparison, HD has a market cap of 365.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TTSH is priced at $6.37, while HD trades at $368.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTSH currently has a P/E ratio of 637.00, whereas HD's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, TTSH's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HD's ROE of +2.36%. Regarding short-term risk, TTSH is more volatile compared to HD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTSH.

TTSH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTSH stands at 284.9M. In comparison, LOW has a market cap of 126.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TTSH is priced at $6.37, while LOW trades at $225.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTSH currently has a P/E ratio of 637.00, whereas LOW's P/E ratio is 18.65. In terms of profitability, TTSH's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LOW's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, TTSH is more volatile compared to LOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTSH.

TTSH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTSH stands at 284.9M. In comparison, FND has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TTSH is priced at $6.37, while FND trades at $71.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTSH currently has a P/E ratio of 637.00, whereas FND's P/E ratio is 37.92. In terms of profitability, TTSH's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FND's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TTSH is more volatile compared to FND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTSH.

TTSH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTSH stands at 284.9M. In comparison, MLHR has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TTSH is priced at $6.37, while MLHR trades at $38.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTSH currently has a P/E ratio of 637.00, whereas MLHR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TTSH's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MLHR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TTSH is more volatile compared to MLHR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTSH.

TTSH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTSH stands at 284.9M. In comparison, ARHS has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TTSH is priced at $6.37, while ARHS trades at $8.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTSH currently has a P/E ratio of 637.00, whereas ARHS's P/E ratio is 21.90. In terms of profitability, TTSH's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ARHS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TTSH is less volatile compared to ARHS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTSH.

TTSH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTSH stands at 284.9M. In comparison, HVT has a market cap of 339.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TTSH is priced at $6.37, while HVT trades at $21.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTSH currently has a P/E ratio of 637.00, whereas HVT's P/E ratio is 16.41. In terms of profitability, TTSH's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HVT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TTSH is more volatile compared to HVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTSH.

TTSH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTSH stands at 284.9M. In comparison, HVT-A has a market cap of 337.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TTSH is priced at $6.37, while HVT-A trades at $20.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTSH currently has a P/E ratio of 637.00, whereas HVT-A's P/E ratio is 16.18. In terms of profitability, TTSH's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HVT-A's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TTSH is more volatile compared to HVT-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTSH.

TTSH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTSH stands at 284.9M. In comparison, LESL has a market cap of 139.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TTSH is priced at $6.37, while LESL trades at $0.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTSH currently has a P/E ratio of 637.00, whereas LESL's P/E ratio is -3.01. In terms of profitability, TTSH's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LESL's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TTSH is less volatile compared to LESL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTSH.

TTSH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTSH stands at 284.9M. In comparison, LIVE has a market cap of 66.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TTSH is priced at $6.37, while LIVE trades at $21.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTSH currently has a P/E ratio of 637.00, whereas LIVE's P/E ratio is -11.35. In terms of profitability, TTSH's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LIVE's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TTSH is less volatile compared to LIVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTSH.

TTSH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTSH stands at 284.9M. In comparison, PFAI has a market cap of 32.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TTSH is priced at $6.37, while PFAI trades at $2.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTSH currently has a P/E ratio of 637.00, whereas PFAI's P/E ratio is 46.00. In terms of profitability, TTSH's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PFAI's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, TTSH is less volatile compared to PFAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTSH.

TTSH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTSH stands at 284.9M. In comparison, LL has a market cap of 25.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TTSH is priced at $6.37, while LL trades at $0.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTSH currently has a P/E ratio of 637.00, whereas LL's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, TTSH's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LL's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, TTSH is less volatile compared to LL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTSH.

TTSH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TTSH stands at 284.9M. In comparison, HBP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TTSH is priced at $6.37, while HBP trades at $10.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TTSH currently has a P/E ratio of 637.00, whereas HBP's P/E ratio is 6.07. In terms of profitability, TTSH's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HBP's ROE of +0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, TTSH is more volatile compared to HBP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTSH.