LL Flooring Holdings, Inc. (LL) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (LL) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Home Improvement Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LL | $0.84 | +0.45% | 25.9M | -0.20 | -$4.22 | N/A |
| HD | $350.84 | -0.52% | 349.9B | 24.09 | $14.57 | +2.63% |
| LOW | $221.92 | +0.65% | 124.4B | 17.89 | $12.40 | +2.15% |
| FND | $59.06 | -0.51% | 6.4B | 32.10 | $1.84 | N/A |
| MLHR | $38.66 | +0.08% | 2.9B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| ARHS | $8.59 | +2.02% | 1.2B | 18.28 | $0.47 | +4.11% |
| HVT-A | $30.47 | +8.47% | 445.7M | 19.56 | $1.56 | +5.13% |
| HVT | $25.44 | -0.35% | 408.8M | 21.17 | $1.20 | +5.13% |
| EMPG | $17.36 | +0.00% | 143M | 192.89 | $0.09 | N/A |
| TTSH | $3.00 | +1.69% | 119.5M | -28.28 | -$0.11 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
LL vs HD Comparison July 2026
LL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LL stands at 25.9M. In comparison, HD has a market cap of 349.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LL is priced at $0.84, while HD trades at $350.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas HD's P/E ratio is 24.09. In terms of profitability, LL's ROE is -0.50%, compared to HD's ROE of +1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LL is more volatile compared to HD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LL.Check HD's competition here
LL vs LOW Comparison July 2026
LL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LL stands at 25.9M. In comparison, LOW has a market cap of 124.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LL is priced at $0.84, while LOW trades at $221.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas LOW's P/E ratio is 17.89. In terms of profitability, LL's ROE is -0.50%, compared to LOW's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, LL is more volatile compared to LOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LL.Check LOW's competition here
LL vs FND Comparison July 2026
LL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LL stands at 25.9M. In comparison, FND has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LL is priced at $0.84, while FND trades at $59.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas FND's P/E ratio is 32.10. In terms of profitability, LL's ROE is -0.50%, compared to FND's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LL is more volatile compared to FND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LL.Check FND's competition here
LL vs MLHR Comparison July 2026
LL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LL stands at 25.9M. In comparison, MLHR has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LL is priced at $0.84, while MLHR trades at $38.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas MLHR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LL's ROE is -0.50%, compared to MLHR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LL is more volatile compared to MLHR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LL.Check MLHR's competition here
LL vs ARHS Comparison July 2026
LL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LL stands at 25.9M. In comparison, ARHS has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LL is priced at $0.84, while ARHS trades at $8.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas ARHS's P/E ratio is 18.28. In terms of profitability, LL's ROE is -0.50%, compared to ARHS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LL is more volatile compared to ARHS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LL.Check ARHS's competition here
LL vs HVT-A Comparison July 2026
LL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LL stands at 25.9M. In comparison, HVT-A has a market cap of 445.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LL is priced at $0.84, while HVT-A trades at $30.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas HVT-A's P/E ratio is 19.56. In terms of profitability, LL's ROE is -0.50%, compared to HVT-A's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LL is more volatile compared to HVT-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LL.Check HVT-A's competition here
LL vs HVT Comparison July 2026
LL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LL stands at 25.9M. In comparison, HVT has a market cap of 408.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LL is priced at $0.84, while HVT trades at $25.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas HVT's P/E ratio is 21.17. In terms of profitability, LL's ROE is -0.50%, compared to HVT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LL is more volatile compared to HVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LL.Check HVT's competition here
LL vs EMPG Comparison July 2026
LL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LL stands at 25.9M. In comparison, EMPG has a market cap of 143M. Regarding current trading prices, LL is priced at $0.84, while EMPG trades at $17.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas EMPG's P/E ratio is 192.89. In terms of profitability, LL's ROE is -0.50%, compared to EMPG's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, LL is more volatile compared to EMPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LL.Check EMPG's competition here
LL vs TTSH Comparison July 2026
LL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LL stands at 25.9M. In comparison, TTSH has a market cap of 119.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LL is priced at $0.84, while TTSH trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas TTSH's P/E ratio is -28.28. In terms of profitability, LL's ROE is -0.50%, compared to TTSH's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LL is more volatile compared to TTSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LL.Check TTSH's competition here
LL vs LESL Comparison July 2026
LL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LL stands at 25.9M. In comparison, LESL has a market cap of 89.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LL is priced at $0.84, while LESL trades at $9.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas LESL's P/E ratio is -1.47. In terms of profitability, LL's ROE is -0.50%, compared to LESL's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, LL is more volatile compared to LESL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LL.Check LESL's competition here
LL vs PFAI Comparison July 2026
LL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LL stands at 25.9M. In comparison, PFAI has a market cap of 43.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LL is priced at $0.84, while PFAI trades at $3.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas PFAI's P/E ratio is -22.00. In terms of profitability, LL's ROE is -0.50%, compared to PFAI's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, LL is more volatile compared to PFAI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LL.Check PFAI's competition here
LL vs LIVE Comparison July 2026
LL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LL stands at 25.9M. In comparison, LIVE has a market cap of 32.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LL is priced at $0.84, while LIVE trades at $9.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas LIVE's P/E ratio is 13.56. In terms of profitability, LL's ROE is -0.50%, compared to LIVE's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LL is more volatile compared to LIVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LL.Check LIVE's competition here
LL vs CAA Comparison July 2026
LL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LL stands at 25.9M. In comparison, CAA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LL is priced at $0.84, while CAA trades at $53.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas CAA's P/E ratio is 15.73. In terms of profitability, LL's ROE is -0.50%, compared to CAA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LL is more volatile compared to CAA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LL.Check CAA's competition here
LL vs FLE Comparison July 2026
LL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LL stands at 25.9M. In comparison, FLE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LL is priced at $0.84, while FLE trades at $15,400.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas FLE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LL's ROE is -0.50%, compared to FLE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LL is more volatile compared to FLE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LL.Check FLE's competition here
LL vs HBP Comparison July 2026
LL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LL stands at 25.9M. In comparison, HBP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LL is priced at $0.84, while HBP trades at $10.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas HBP's P/E ratio is 6.07. In terms of profitability, LL's ROE is -0.50%, compared to HBP's ROE of +0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, LL is more volatile compared to HBP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LL.Check HBP's competition here