LL Flooring Holdings, Inc.
LL Flooring Holdings, Inc. (LL) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (LL) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Home Improvement Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LL | $0.84 | +0.45% | 25.9M | -0.20 | -$4.22 | N/A |
| HD | $302.44 | +0.88% | 301.3B | 21.24 | $14.24 | +3.06% |
| LOW | $218.37 | +0.16% | 122.3B | 18.41 | $11.86 | +2.20% |
| FND | $44.22 | -1.69% | 4.8B | 24.03 | $1.84 | N/A |
| MLHR | $38.66 | +0.08% | 2.9B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| ARHS | $5.78 | -1.53% | 818.1M | 12.30 | $0.47 | +6.12% |
| HVT-A | $22.29 | -6.11% | 358.8M | 18.27 | $1.22 | +6.15% |
| HVT | $21.22 | +0.14% | 342.8M | 17.46 | $1.22 | +6.15% |
| EMPG | $17.36 | +0.00% | 143M | 192.89 | $0.09 | N/A |
| TTSH | $2.70 | -0.74% | 107.5M | -27.00 | -$0.10 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
LL vs HD Comparison May 2026
LL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LL stands at 25.9M. In comparison, HD has a market cap of 301.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LL is priced at $0.84, while HD trades at $302.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas HD's P/E ratio is 21.24. In terms of profitability, LL's ROE is -0.50%, compared to HD's ROE of +1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LL is more volatile compared to HD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LL.Check HD's competition here
LL vs LOW Comparison May 2026
LL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LL stands at 25.9M. In comparison, LOW has a market cap of 122.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LL is priced at $0.84, while LOW trades at $218.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas LOW's P/E ratio is 18.41. In terms of profitability, LL's ROE is -0.50%, compared to LOW's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, LL is more volatile compared to LOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LL.Check LOW's competition here
LL vs FND Comparison May 2026
LL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LL stands at 25.9M. In comparison, FND has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LL is priced at $0.84, while FND trades at $44.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas FND's P/E ratio is 24.03. In terms of profitability, LL's ROE is -0.50%, compared to FND's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LL is more volatile compared to FND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LL.Check FND's competition here
LL vs MLHR Comparison May 2026
LL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LL stands at 25.9M. In comparison, MLHR has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LL is priced at $0.84, while MLHR trades at $38.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas MLHR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LL's ROE is -0.50%, compared to MLHR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LL is more volatile compared to MLHR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LL.Check MLHR's competition here
LL vs ARHS Comparison May 2026
LL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LL stands at 25.9M. In comparison, ARHS has a market cap of 818.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LL is priced at $0.84, while ARHS trades at $5.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas ARHS's P/E ratio is 12.30. In terms of profitability, LL's ROE is -0.50%, compared to ARHS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LL is more volatile compared to ARHS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LL.Check ARHS's competition here
LL vs HVT-A Comparison May 2026
LL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LL stands at 25.9M. In comparison, HVT-A has a market cap of 358.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LL is priced at $0.84, while HVT-A trades at $22.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas HVT-A's P/E ratio is 18.27. In terms of profitability, LL's ROE is -0.50%, compared to HVT-A's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LL is more volatile compared to HVT-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LL.Check HVT-A's competition here
LL vs HVT Comparison May 2026
LL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LL stands at 25.9M. In comparison, HVT has a market cap of 342.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LL is priced at $0.84, while HVT trades at $21.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas HVT's P/E ratio is 17.46. In terms of profitability, LL's ROE is -0.50%, compared to HVT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LL is more volatile compared to HVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LL.Check HVT's competition here
LL vs EMPG Comparison May 2026
LL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LL stands at 25.9M. In comparison, EMPG has a market cap of 143M. Regarding current trading prices, LL is priced at $0.84, while EMPG trades at $17.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas EMPG's P/E ratio is 192.89. In terms of profitability, LL's ROE is -0.50%, compared to EMPG's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, LL is more volatile compared to EMPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LL.Check EMPG's competition here
LL vs TTSH Comparison May 2026
LL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LL stands at 25.9M. In comparison, TTSH has a market cap of 107.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LL is priced at $0.84, while TTSH trades at $2.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas TTSH's P/E ratio is -27.00. In terms of profitability, LL's ROE is -0.50%, compared to TTSH's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LL is more volatile compared to TTSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LL.Check TTSH's competition here
LL vs PFAI Comparison May 2026
LL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LL stands at 25.9M. In comparison, PFAI has a market cap of 46.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LL is priced at $0.84, while PFAI trades at $3.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas PFAI's P/E ratio is -23.18. In terms of profitability, LL's ROE is -0.50%, compared to PFAI's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, LL is more volatile compared to PFAI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LL.Check PFAI's competition here
LL vs LIVE Comparison May 2026
LL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LL stands at 25.9M. In comparison, LIVE has a market cap of 34.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LL is priced at $0.84, while LIVE trades at $11.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas LIVE's P/E ratio is -10.28. In terms of profitability, LL's ROE is -0.50%, compared to LIVE's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LL is less volatile compared to LIVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LL.Check LIVE's competition here
LL vs LESL Comparison May 2026
LL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LL stands at 25.9M. In comparison, LESL has a market cap of 24.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LL is priced at $0.84, while LESL trades at $2.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas LESL's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, LL's ROE is -0.50%, compared to LESL's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, LL is less volatile compared to LESL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LL.Check LESL's competition here
LL vs CAA Comparison May 2026
LL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LL stands at 25.9M. In comparison, CAA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LL is priced at $0.84, while CAA trades at $53.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas CAA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LL's ROE is -0.50%, compared to CAA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LL is more volatile compared to CAA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LL.Check CAA's competition here
LL vs FLE Comparison May 2026
LL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LL stands at 25.9M. In comparison, FLE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LL is priced at $0.84, while FLE trades at $15,400.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas FLE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LL's ROE is -0.50%, compared to FLE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LL is more volatile compared to FLE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LL.Check FLE's competition here
LL vs HBP Comparison May 2026
LL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LL stands at 25.9M. In comparison, HBP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LL is priced at $0.84, while HBP trades at $10.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas HBP's P/E ratio is 6.07. In terms of profitability, LL's ROE is -0.50%, compared to HBP's ROE of +0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, LL is more volatile compared to HBP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LL.Check HBP's competition here