Haverty Furniture Companies, Inc.
Haverty Furniture Companies, Inc. (HVT-A) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (HVT-A) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Home Improvement Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HVT-A | $22.50 | -5.88% | 393.4M | 20.38 | $1.19 | +5.72% |
| HD | $333.96 | -1.82% | 334.6B | 23.51 | $14.29 | +2.75% |
| LOW | $243.83 | -1.10% | 136.9B | 20.61 | $11.86 | +1.97% |
| FND | $49.87 | -2.12% | 5.5B | 26.60 | $1.92 | N/A |
| MLHR | $38.66 | +0.08% | 2.9B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| ARHS | $7.55 | +0.40% | 1.1B | 15.94 | $0.48 | +4.57% |
| HVT | $22.59 | -0.83% | 367.4M | 19.08 | $1.19 | +5.72% |
| EMPG | $17.36 | +0.00% | 143M | 192.89 | $0.09 | N/A |
| TTSH | $3.24 | +8.00% | 131.9M | -29.50 | -$0.10 | N/A |
| PFAI | $4.00 | +0.50% | 47.3M | -202.00 | -$0.02 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
HVT-A vs HD Comparison April 2026
HVT-A plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HVT-A stands at 393.4M. In comparison, HD has a market cap of 334.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HVT-A is priced at $22.50, while HD trades at $333.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HVT-A currently has a P/E ratio of 20.38, whereas HD's P/E ratio is 23.51. In terms of profitability, HVT-A's ROE is +0.03%, compared to HD's ROE of +1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, HVT-A is less volatile compared to HD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HVT-A.Check HD's competition here
HVT-A vs LOW Comparison April 2026
HVT-A plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HVT-A stands at 393.4M. In comparison, LOW has a market cap of 136.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HVT-A is priced at $22.50, while LOW trades at $243.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HVT-A currently has a P/E ratio of 20.38, whereas LOW's P/E ratio is 20.61. In terms of profitability, HVT-A's ROE is +0.03%, compared to LOW's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, HVT-A is less volatile compared to LOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HVT-A.Check LOW's competition here
HVT-A vs FND Comparison April 2026
HVT-A plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HVT-A stands at 393.4M. In comparison, FND has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HVT-A is priced at $22.50, while FND trades at $49.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HVT-A currently has a P/E ratio of 20.38, whereas FND's P/E ratio is 26.60. In terms of profitability, HVT-A's ROE is +0.03%, compared to FND's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HVT-A is less volatile compared to FND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HVT-A.Check FND's competition here
HVT-A vs MLHR Comparison April 2026
HVT-A plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HVT-A stands at 393.4M. In comparison, MLHR has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HVT-A is priced at $22.50, while MLHR trades at $38.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HVT-A currently has a P/E ratio of 20.38, whereas MLHR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HVT-A's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MLHR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HVT-A is more volatile compared to MLHR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HVT-A.Check MLHR's competition here
HVT-A vs ARHS Comparison April 2026
HVT-A plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HVT-A stands at 393.4M. In comparison, ARHS has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HVT-A is priced at $22.50, while ARHS trades at $7.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HVT-A currently has a P/E ratio of 20.38, whereas ARHS's P/E ratio is 15.94. In terms of profitability, HVT-A's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ARHS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HVT-A is less volatile compared to ARHS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HVT-A.Check ARHS's competition here
HVT-A vs HVT Comparison April 2026
HVT-A plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HVT-A stands at 393.4M. In comparison, HVT has a market cap of 367.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HVT-A is priced at $22.50, while HVT trades at $22.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HVT-A currently has a P/E ratio of 20.38, whereas HVT's P/E ratio is 19.08. In terms of profitability, HVT-A's ROE is +0.03%, compared to HVT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HVT-A is less volatile compared to HVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HVT-A.Check HVT's competition here
HVT-A vs EMPG Comparison April 2026
HVT-A plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HVT-A stands at 393.4M. In comparison, EMPG has a market cap of 143M. Regarding current trading prices, HVT-A is priced at $22.50, while EMPG trades at $17.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HVT-A currently has a P/E ratio of 20.38, whereas EMPG's P/E ratio is 192.89. In terms of profitability, HVT-A's ROE is +0.03%, compared to EMPG's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, HVT-A is more volatile compared to EMPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HVT-A.Check EMPG's competition here
HVT-A vs TTSH Comparison April 2026
HVT-A plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HVT-A stands at 393.4M. In comparison, TTSH has a market cap of 131.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HVT-A is priced at $22.50, while TTSH trades at $3.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HVT-A currently has a P/E ratio of 20.38, whereas TTSH's P/E ratio is -29.50. In terms of profitability, HVT-A's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TTSH's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HVT-A is more volatile compared to TTSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HVT-A.Check TTSH's competition here
HVT-A vs PFAI Comparison April 2026
HVT-A plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HVT-A stands at 393.4M. In comparison, PFAI has a market cap of 47.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HVT-A is priced at $22.50, while PFAI trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HVT-A currently has a P/E ratio of 20.38, whereas PFAI's P/E ratio is -202.00. In terms of profitability, HVT-A's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PFAI's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, HVT-A is less volatile compared to PFAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HVT-A.Check PFAI's competition here
HVT-A vs LIVE Comparison April 2026
HVT-A plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HVT-A stands at 393.4M. In comparison, LIVE has a market cap of 42.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HVT-A is priced at $22.50, while LIVE trades at $13.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HVT-A currently has a P/E ratio of 20.38, whereas LIVE's P/E ratio is 2.88. In terms of profitability, HVT-A's ROE is +0.03%, compared to LIVE's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, HVT-A is less volatile compared to LIVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HVT-A.Check LIVE's competition here
HVT-A vs LL Comparison April 2026
HVT-A plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HVT-A stands at 393.4M. In comparison, LL has a market cap of 25.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HVT-A is priced at $22.50, while LL trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HVT-A currently has a P/E ratio of 20.38, whereas LL's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, HVT-A's ROE is +0.03%, compared to LL's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, HVT-A is less volatile compared to LL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HVT-A.Check LL's competition here
HVT-A vs LESL Comparison April 2026
HVT-A plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HVT-A stands at 393.4M. In comparison, LESL has a market cap of 19.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HVT-A is priced at $22.50, while LESL trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HVT-A currently has a P/E ratio of 20.38, whereas LESL's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, HVT-A's ROE is +0.03%, compared to LESL's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, HVT-A is less volatile compared to LESL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HVT-A.Check LESL's competition here
HVT-A vs HBP Comparison April 2026
HVT-A plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HVT-A stands at 393.4M. In comparison, HBP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HVT-A is priced at $22.50, while HBP trades at $10.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HVT-A currently has a P/E ratio of 20.38, whereas HBP's P/E ratio is 6.07. In terms of profitability, HVT-A's ROE is +0.03%, compared to HBP's ROE of +0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, HVT-A is more volatile compared to HBP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HVT-A.Check HBP's competition here
HVT-A vs FLE Comparison April 2026
HVT-A plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HVT-A stands at 393.4M. In comparison, FLE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HVT-A is priced at $22.50, while FLE trades at $15,400.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HVT-A currently has a P/E ratio of 20.38, whereas FLE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HVT-A's ROE is +0.03%, compared to FLE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HVT-A is more volatile compared to FLE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HVT-A.Check FLE's competition here
HVT-A vs CAA Comparison April 2026
HVT-A plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HVT-A stands at 393.4M. In comparison, CAA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HVT-A is priced at $22.50, while CAA trades at $53.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HVT-A currently has a P/E ratio of 20.38, whereas CAA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HVT-A's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CAA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HVT-A is less volatile compared to CAA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HVT-A.Check CAA's competition here