Huttig Building Products, Inc.
Huttig Building Products, Inc. (HBP) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (HBP) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Home Improvement Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HBP | $10.70 | +0.00% | 0 | 6.07 | $1.76 | N/A |
| HD | $310.58 | +2.69% | 309.4B | 22.05 | $14.09 | +2.98% |
| LOW | $221.05 | +1.23% | 123.8B | 18.64 | $11.86 | +2.18% |
| FND | $47.04 | +6.38% | 5.1B | 25.57 | $1.84 | N/A |
| MLHR | $38.66 | +0.08% | 2.9B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| ARHS | $5.99 | +3.63% | 847.1M | 12.73 | $0.47 | +5.88% |
| HVT-A | $23.23 | -2.15% | 373.9M | 19.04 | $1.22 | +5.97% |
| HVT | $21.80 | +2.73% | 351M | 17.88 | $1.22 | +5.97% |
| EMPG | $17.36 | +0.00% | 143M | 192.89 | $0.09 | N/A |
| TTSH | $2.65 | -1.85% | 105.5M | -26.50 | -$0.10 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
HBP vs HD Comparison May 2026
HBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBP stands at 0. In comparison, HD has a market cap of 309.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HBP is priced at $10.70, while HD trades at $310.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.07, whereas HD's P/E ratio is 22.05. In terms of profitability, HBP's ROE is +0.72%, compared to HD's ROE of +1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HBP is less volatile compared to HD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBP.Check HD's competition here
HBP vs LOW Comparison May 2026
HBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBP stands at 0. In comparison, LOW has a market cap of 123.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HBP is priced at $10.70, while LOW trades at $221.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.07, whereas LOW's P/E ratio is 18.64. In terms of profitability, HBP's ROE is +0.72%, compared to LOW's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, HBP is less volatile compared to LOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBP.Check LOW's competition here
HBP vs FND Comparison May 2026
HBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBP stands at 0. In comparison, FND has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HBP is priced at $10.70, while FND trades at $47.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.07, whereas FND's P/E ratio is 25.57. In terms of profitability, HBP's ROE is +0.72%, compared to FND's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HBP is less volatile compared to FND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBP.Check FND's competition here
HBP vs MLHR Comparison May 2026
HBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBP stands at 0. In comparison, MLHR has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HBP is priced at $10.70, while MLHR trades at $38.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.07, whereas MLHR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HBP's ROE is +0.72%, compared to MLHR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HBP is less volatile compared to MLHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBP.Check MLHR's competition here
HBP vs ARHS Comparison May 2026
HBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBP stands at 0. In comparison, ARHS has a market cap of 847.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HBP is priced at $10.70, while ARHS trades at $5.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.07, whereas ARHS's P/E ratio is 12.73. In terms of profitability, HBP's ROE is +0.72%, compared to ARHS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HBP is less volatile compared to ARHS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBP.Check ARHS's competition here
HBP vs HVT-A Comparison May 2026
HBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBP stands at 0. In comparison, HVT-A has a market cap of 373.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HBP is priced at $10.70, while HVT-A trades at $23.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.07, whereas HVT-A's P/E ratio is 19.04. In terms of profitability, HBP's ROE is +0.72%, compared to HVT-A's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HBP is more volatile compared to HVT-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBP.Check HVT-A's competition here
HBP vs HVT Comparison May 2026
HBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBP stands at 0. In comparison, HVT has a market cap of 351M. Regarding current trading prices, HBP is priced at $10.70, while HVT trades at $21.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.07, whereas HVT's P/E ratio is 17.88. In terms of profitability, HBP's ROE is +0.72%, compared to HVT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HBP is less volatile compared to HVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBP.Check HVT's competition here
HBP vs EMPG Comparison May 2026
HBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBP stands at 0. In comparison, EMPG has a market cap of 143M. Regarding current trading prices, HBP is priced at $10.70, while EMPG trades at $17.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.07, whereas EMPG's P/E ratio is 192.89. In terms of profitability, HBP's ROE is +0.72%, compared to EMPG's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, HBP is more volatile compared to EMPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBP.Check EMPG's competition here
HBP vs TTSH Comparison May 2026
HBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBP stands at 0. In comparison, TTSH has a market cap of 105.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HBP is priced at $10.70, while TTSH trades at $2.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.07, whereas TTSH's P/E ratio is -26.50. In terms of profitability, HBP's ROE is +0.72%, compared to TTSH's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HBP is less volatile compared to TTSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBP.Check TTSH's competition here
HBP vs PFAI Comparison May 2026
HBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBP stands at 0. In comparison, PFAI has a market cap of 42.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HBP is priced at $10.70, while PFAI trades at $3.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.07, whereas PFAI's P/E ratio is -21.47. In terms of profitability, HBP's ROE is +0.72%, compared to PFAI's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, HBP is less volatile compared to PFAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBP.Check PFAI's competition here
HBP vs LIVE Comparison May 2026
HBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBP stands at 0. In comparison, LIVE has a market cap of 33.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HBP is priced at $10.70, while LIVE trades at $10.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.07, whereas LIVE's P/E ratio is -9.88. In terms of profitability, HBP's ROE is +0.72%, compared to LIVE's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HBP is less volatile compared to LIVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBP.Check LIVE's competition here
HBP vs LESL Comparison May 2026
HBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBP stands at 0. In comparison, LESL has a market cap of 28.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HBP is priced at $10.70, while LESL trades at $3.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.07, whereas LESL's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, HBP's ROE is +0.72%, compared to LESL's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, HBP is less volatile compared to LESL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBP.Check LESL's competition here
HBP vs LL Comparison May 2026
HBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBP stands at 0. In comparison, LL has a market cap of 25.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HBP is priced at $10.70, while LL trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.07, whereas LL's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, HBP's ROE is +0.72%, compared to LL's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, HBP is less volatile compared to LL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBP.Check LL's competition here
HBP vs CAA Comparison May 2026
HBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBP stands at 0. In comparison, CAA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HBP is priced at $10.70, while CAA trades at $53.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.07, whereas CAA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HBP's ROE is +0.72%, compared to CAA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HBP is less volatile compared to CAA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBP.Check CAA's competition here
HBP vs FLE Comparison May 2026
HBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HBP stands at 0. In comparison, FLE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HBP is priced at $10.70, while FLE trades at $15,400.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HBP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.07, whereas FLE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HBP's ROE is +0.72%, compared to FLE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HBP is more volatile compared to FLE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBP.Check FLE's competition here