Lowe's Companies, Inc.
Lowe's Companies, Inc. (LOW) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (LOW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Home Improvement Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LOW | $244.45 | -0.85% | 136.9B | 20.61 | $11.86 | +1.97% |
| HD | $335.89 | -1.26% | 334.6B | 23.51 | $14.29 | +2.75% |
| FND | $51.08 | +0.26% | 5.5B | 26.60 | $1.92 | N/A |
| MLHR | $38.66 | +0.08% | 2.9B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| ARHS | $7.65 | +1.73% | 1.1B | 15.94 | $0.48 | +4.57% |
| HVT-A | $24.25 | +1.44% | 393.4M | 20.38 | $1.19 | +5.72% |
| HVT | $22.71 | -0.31% | 367.4M | 19.08 | $1.19 | +5.72% |
| EMPG | $17.36 | +0.00% | 143M | 192.89 | $0.09 | N/A |
| TTSH | $2.95 | -1.67% | 131.9M | -29.50 | -$0.10 | N/A |
| PFAI | $4.01 | +0.75% | 47.3M | -202.00 | -$0.02 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
LOW vs HD Comparison April 2026
LOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOW stands at 136.9B. In comparison, HD has a market cap of 334.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LOW is priced at $244.45, while HD trades at $335.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOW currently has a P/E ratio of 20.61, whereas HD's P/E ratio is 23.51. In terms of profitability, LOW's ROE is -0.59%, compared to HD's ROE of +1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LOW is more volatile compared to HD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOW.Check HD's competition here
LOW vs FND Comparison April 2026
LOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOW stands at 136.9B. In comparison, FND has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LOW is priced at $244.45, while FND trades at $51.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOW currently has a P/E ratio of 20.61, whereas FND's P/E ratio is 26.60. In terms of profitability, LOW's ROE is -0.59%, compared to FND's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LOW is less volatile compared to FND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOW.Check FND's competition here
LOW vs MLHR Comparison April 2026
LOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOW stands at 136.9B. In comparison, MLHR has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LOW is priced at $244.45, while MLHR trades at $38.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOW currently has a P/E ratio of 20.61, whereas MLHR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LOW's ROE is -0.59%, compared to MLHR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LOW is more volatile compared to MLHR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOW.Check MLHR's competition here
LOW vs ARHS Comparison April 2026
LOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOW stands at 136.9B. In comparison, ARHS has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LOW is priced at $244.45, while ARHS trades at $7.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOW currently has a P/E ratio of 20.61, whereas ARHS's P/E ratio is 15.94. In terms of profitability, LOW's ROE is -0.59%, compared to ARHS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LOW is less volatile compared to ARHS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOW.Check ARHS's competition here
LOW vs HVT-A Comparison April 2026
LOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOW stands at 136.9B. In comparison, HVT-A has a market cap of 393.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LOW is priced at $244.45, while HVT-A trades at $24.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOW currently has a P/E ratio of 20.61, whereas HVT-A's P/E ratio is 20.38. In terms of profitability, LOW's ROE is -0.59%, compared to HVT-A's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LOW is more volatile compared to HVT-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOW.Check HVT-A's competition here
LOW vs HVT Comparison April 2026
LOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOW stands at 136.9B. In comparison, HVT has a market cap of 367.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LOW is priced at $244.45, while HVT trades at $22.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOW currently has a P/E ratio of 20.61, whereas HVT's P/E ratio is 19.08. In terms of profitability, LOW's ROE is -0.59%, compared to HVT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LOW is more volatile compared to HVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOW.Check HVT's competition here
LOW vs EMPG Comparison April 2026
LOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOW stands at 136.9B. In comparison, EMPG has a market cap of 143M. Regarding current trading prices, LOW is priced at $244.45, while EMPG trades at $17.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOW currently has a P/E ratio of 20.61, whereas EMPG's P/E ratio is 192.89. In terms of profitability, LOW's ROE is -0.59%, compared to EMPG's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, LOW is more volatile compared to EMPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOW.Check EMPG's competition here
LOW vs TTSH Comparison April 2026
LOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOW stands at 136.9B. In comparison, TTSH has a market cap of 131.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LOW is priced at $244.45, while TTSH trades at $2.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOW currently has a P/E ratio of 20.61, whereas TTSH's P/E ratio is -29.50. In terms of profitability, LOW's ROE is -0.59%, compared to TTSH's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LOW is less volatile compared to TTSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOW.Check TTSH's competition here
LOW vs PFAI Comparison April 2026
LOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOW stands at 136.9B. In comparison, PFAI has a market cap of 47.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LOW is priced at $244.45, while PFAI trades at $4.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOW currently has a P/E ratio of 20.61, whereas PFAI's P/E ratio is -202.00. In terms of profitability, LOW's ROE is -0.59%, compared to PFAI's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, LOW is less volatile compared to PFAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOW.Check PFAI's competition here
LOW vs LIVE Comparison April 2026
LOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOW stands at 136.9B. In comparison, LIVE has a market cap of 42.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LOW is priced at $244.45, while LIVE trades at $13.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOW currently has a P/E ratio of 20.61, whereas LIVE's P/E ratio is 2.88. In terms of profitability, LOW's ROE is -0.59%, compared to LIVE's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LOW is more volatile compared to LIVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOW.Check LIVE's competition here
LOW vs LL Comparison April 2026
LOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOW stands at 136.9B. In comparison, LL has a market cap of 25.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LOW is priced at $244.45, while LL trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOW currently has a P/E ratio of 20.61, whereas LL's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, LOW's ROE is -0.59%, compared to LL's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, LOW is less volatile compared to LL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOW.Check LL's competition here
LOW vs LESL Comparison April 2026
LOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOW stands at 136.9B. In comparison, LESL has a market cap of 19.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LOW is priced at $244.45, while LESL trades at $2.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOW currently has a P/E ratio of 20.61, whereas LESL's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, LOW's ROE is -0.59%, compared to LESL's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, LOW is less volatile compared to LESL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOW.Check LESL's competition here
LOW vs HBP Comparison April 2026
LOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOW stands at 136.9B. In comparison, HBP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LOW is priced at $244.45, while HBP trades at $10.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOW currently has a P/E ratio of 20.61, whereas HBP's P/E ratio is 6.07. In terms of profitability, LOW's ROE is -0.59%, compared to HBP's ROE of +0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, LOW is more volatile compared to HBP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOW.Check HBP's competition here
LOW vs CAA Comparison April 2026
LOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOW stands at 136.9B. In comparison, CAA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LOW is priced at $244.45, while CAA trades at $53.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOW currently has a P/E ratio of 20.61, whereas CAA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LOW's ROE is -0.59%, compared to CAA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LOW is less volatile compared to CAA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOW.Check CAA's competition here
LOW vs FLE Comparison April 2026
LOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOW stands at 136.9B. In comparison, FLE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LOW is priced at $244.45, while FLE trades at $15,400.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOW currently has a P/E ratio of 20.61, whereas FLE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LOW's ROE is -0.59%, compared to FLE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LOW is more volatile compared to FLE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOW.Check FLE's competition here