Lowe's Companies, Inc. (LOW) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (LOW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Home Improvement Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LOW | $222.48 | +0.25% | 124.8B | 17.95 | $12.40 | +2.17% |
| HD | $348.86 | +1.12% | 347.4B | 23.91 | $14.57 | +2.67% |
| FND | $59.61 | +2.21% | 6.4B | 32.39 | $1.84 | N/A |
| MLHR | $38.66 | +0.08% | 2.9B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| ARHS | $8.41 | +3.83% | 1.2B | 17.89 | $0.47 | +4.19% |
| HVT-A | $28.09 | +0.00% | 434.1M | 18.03 | $1.56 | +5.20% |
| HVT | $25.81 | +2.67% | 415.2M | 21.50 | $1.20 | +5.20% |
| EMPG | $17.36 | +0.00% | 143M | 192.89 | $0.09 | N/A |
| TTSH | $3.00 | -2.91% | 119.5M | -28.28 | -$0.11 | N/A |
| LESL | $9.59 | +9.73% | 89.8M | -1.47 | -$6.51 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
LOW vs HD Comparison July 2026
LOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOW stands at 124.8B. In comparison, HD has a market cap of 347.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LOW is priced at $222.48, while HD trades at $348.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOW currently has a P/E ratio of 17.95, whereas HD's P/E ratio is 23.91. In terms of profitability, LOW's ROE is -0.65%, compared to HD's ROE of +1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LOW is more volatile compared to HD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOW.Check HD's competition here
LOW vs FND Comparison July 2026
LOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOW stands at 124.8B. In comparison, FND has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LOW is priced at $222.48, while FND trades at $59.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOW currently has a P/E ratio of 17.95, whereas FND's P/E ratio is 32.39. In terms of profitability, LOW's ROE is -0.65%, compared to FND's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LOW is less volatile compared to FND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOW.Check FND's competition here
LOW vs MLHR Comparison July 2026
LOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOW stands at 124.8B. In comparison, MLHR has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LOW is priced at $222.48, while MLHR trades at $38.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOW currently has a P/E ratio of 17.95, whereas MLHR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LOW's ROE is -0.65%, compared to MLHR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LOW is more volatile compared to MLHR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOW.Check MLHR's competition here
LOW vs ARHS Comparison July 2026
LOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOW stands at 124.8B. In comparison, ARHS has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LOW is priced at $222.48, while ARHS trades at $8.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOW currently has a P/E ratio of 17.95, whereas ARHS's P/E ratio is 17.89. In terms of profitability, LOW's ROE is -0.65%, compared to ARHS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LOW is less volatile compared to ARHS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOW.Check ARHS's competition here
LOW vs HVT-A Comparison July 2026
LOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOW stands at 124.8B. In comparison, HVT-A has a market cap of 434.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LOW is priced at $222.48, while HVT-A trades at $28.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOW currently has a P/E ratio of 17.95, whereas HVT-A's P/E ratio is 18.03. In terms of profitability, LOW's ROE is -0.65%, compared to HVT-A's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LOW is more volatile compared to HVT-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOW.Check HVT-A's competition here
LOW vs HVT Comparison July 2026
LOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOW stands at 124.8B. In comparison, HVT has a market cap of 415.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LOW is priced at $222.48, while HVT trades at $25.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOW currently has a P/E ratio of 17.95, whereas HVT's P/E ratio is 21.50. In terms of profitability, LOW's ROE is -0.65%, compared to HVT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LOW is less volatile compared to HVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOW.Check HVT's competition here
LOW vs EMPG Comparison July 2026
LOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOW stands at 124.8B. In comparison, EMPG has a market cap of 143M. Regarding current trading prices, LOW is priced at $222.48, while EMPG trades at $17.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOW currently has a P/E ratio of 17.95, whereas EMPG's P/E ratio is 192.89. In terms of profitability, LOW's ROE is -0.65%, compared to EMPG's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, LOW is more volatile compared to EMPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOW.Check EMPG's competition here
LOW vs TTSH Comparison July 2026
LOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOW stands at 124.8B. In comparison, TTSH has a market cap of 119.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LOW is priced at $222.48, while TTSH trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOW currently has a P/E ratio of 17.95, whereas TTSH's P/E ratio is -28.28. In terms of profitability, LOW's ROE is -0.65%, compared to TTSH's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LOW is less volatile compared to TTSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOW.Check TTSH's competition here
LOW vs LESL Comparison July 2026
LOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOW stands at 124.8B. In comparison, LESL has a market cap of 89.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LOW is priced at $222.48, while LESL trades at $9.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOW currently has a P/E ratio of 17.95, whereas LESL's P/E ratio is -1.47. In terms of profitability, LOW's ROE is -0.65%, compared to LESL's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, LOW is less volatile compared to LESL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOW.Check LESL's competition here
LOW vs PFAI Comparison July 2026
LOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOW stands at 124.8B. In comparison, PFAI has a market cap of 42.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LOW is priced at $222.48, while PFAI trades at $3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOW currently has a P/E ratio of 17.95, whereas PFAI's P/E ratio is -21.29. In terms of profitability, LOW's ROE is -0.65%, compared to PFAI's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, LOW is more volatile compared to PFAI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOW.Check PFAI's competition here
LOW vs LIVE Comparison July 2026
LOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOW stands at 124.8B. In comparison, LIVE has a market cap of 32.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LOW is priced at $222.48, while LIVE trades at $10.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOW currently has a P/E ratio of 17.95, whereas LIVE's P/E ratio is 13.88. In terms of profitability, LOW's ROE is -0.65%, compared to LIVE's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LOW is less volatile compared to LIVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOW.Check LIVE's competition here
LOW vs LL Comparison July 2026
LOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOW stands at 124.8B. In comparison, LL has a market cap of 25.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LOW is priced at $222.48, while LL trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOW currently has a P/E ratio of 17.95, whereas LL's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, LOW's ROE is -0.65%, compared to LL's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, LOW is less volatile compared to LL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOW.Check LL's competition here
LOW vs FLE Comparison July 2026
LOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOW stands at 124.8B. In comparison, FLE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LOW is priced at $222.48, while FLE trades at $15,400.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOW currently has a P/E ratio of 17.95, whereas FLE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LOW's ROE is -0.65%, compared to FLE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LOW is more volatile compared to FLE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOW.Check FLE's competition here
LOW vs HBP Comparison July 2026
LOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOW stands at 124.8B. In comparison, HBP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LOW is priced at $222.48, while HBP trades at $10.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOW currently has a P/E ratio of 17.95, whereas HBP's P/E ratio is 6.07. In terms of profitability, LOW's ROE is -0.65%, compared to HBP's ROE of +0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, LOW is more volatile compared to HBP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOW.Check HBP's competition here
LOW vs CAA Comparison July 2026
LOW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOW stands at 124.8B. In comparison, CAA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LOW is priced at $222.48, while CAA trades at $53.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOW currently has a P/E ratio of 17.95, whereas CAA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LOW's ROE is -0.65%, compared to CAA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LOW is less volatile compared to CAA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOW.Check CAA's competition here