MillerKnoll, Inc.
MillerKnoll, Inc. (MLHR) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (MLHR) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Home Improvement Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MLHR | $38.66 | +0.08% | 2.9B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| HD | $327.74 | -0.40% | 321.6B | 22.67 | $14.24 | +2.87% |
| LOW | $236.42 | -1.62% | 130.8B | 19.69 | $11.86 | +2.07% |
| FND | $48.58 | -1.69% | 5.1B | 24.81 | $1.92 | N/A |
| ARHS | $7.51 | -0.46% | 1B | 15.29 | $0.48 | +4.77% |
| HVT-A | $23.06 | +0.00% | 374M | 19.37 | $1.19 | +5.96% |
| HVT | $21.94 | -1.75% | 351.7M | 18.26 | $1.19 | +5.96% |
| EMPG | $17.36 | +0.00% | 143M | 192.89 | $0.09 | N/A |
| TTSH | $3.00 | +3.45% | 115.9M | -29.10 | -$0.10 | N/A |
| PFAI | $3.55 | -13.41% | 46.4M | -198.50 | -$0.02 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
MLHR vs HD Comparison April 2026
MLHR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLHR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, HD has a market cap of 321.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MLHR is priced at $38.66, while HD trades at $327.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLHR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HD's P/E ratio is 22.67. In terms of profitability, MLHR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HD's ROE of +1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, MLHR is less volatile compared to HD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLHR.Check HD's competition here
MLHR vs LOW Comparison April 2026
MLHR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLHR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, LOW has a market cap of 130.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MLHR is priced at $38.66, while LOW trades at $236.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLHR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LOW's P/E ratio is 19.69. In terms of profitability, MLHR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LOW's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, MLHR is less volatile compared to LOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLHR.Check LOW's competition here
MLHR vs FND Comparison April 2026
MLHR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLHR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, FND has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MLHR is priced at $38.66, while FND trades at $48.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLHR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FND's P/E ratio is 24.81. In terms of profitability, MLHR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FND's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MLHR is less volatile compared to FND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLHR.Check FND's competition here
MLHR vs ARHS Comparison April 2026
MLHR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLHR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, ARHS has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, MLHR is priced at $38.66, while ARHS trades at $7.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLHR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARHS's P/E ratio is 15.29. In terms of profitability, MLHR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ARHS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MLHR is less volatile compared to ARHS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLHR.Check ARHS's competition here
MLHR vs HVT-A Comparison April 2026
MLHR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLHR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, HVT-A has a market cap of 374M. Regarding current trading prices, MLHR is priced at $38.66, while HVT-A trades at $23.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLHR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HVT-A's P/E ratio is 19.37. In terms of profitability, MLHR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HVT-A's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MLHR is more volatile compared to HVT-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLHR.Check HVT-A's competition here
MLHR vs HVT Comparison April 2026
MLHR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLHR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, HVT has a market cap of 351.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MLHR is priced at $38.66, while HVT trades at $21.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLHR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HVT's P/E ratio is 18.26. In terms of profitability, MLHR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HVT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MLHR is more volatile compared to HVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLHR.Check HVT's competition here
MLHR vs EMPG Comparison April 2026
MLHR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLHR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, EMPG has a market cap of 143M. Regarding current trading prices, MLHR is priced at $38.66, while EMPG trades at $17.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLHR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EMPG's P/E ratio is 192.89. In terms of profitability, MLHR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to EMPG's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, MLHR is more volatile compared to EMPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLHR.Check EMPG's competition here
MLHR vs TTSH Comparison April 2026
MLHR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLHR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, TTSH has a market cap of 115.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MLHR is priced at $38.66, while TTSH trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLHR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TTSH's P/E ratio is -29.10. In terms of profitability, MLHR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TTSH's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MLHR is more volatile compared to TTSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLHR.Check TTSH's competition here
MLHR vs PFAI Comparison April 2026
MLHR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLHR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, PFAI has a market cap of 46.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MLHR is priced at $38.66, while PFAI trades at $3.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLHR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PFAI's P/E ratio is -198.50. In terms of profitability, MLHR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PFAI's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, MLHR is more volatile compared to PFAI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLHR.Check PFAI's competition here
MLHR vs LIVE Comparison April 2026
MLHR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLHR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, LIVE has a market cap of 41.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MLHR is priced at $38.66, while LIVE trades at $13.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLHR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LIVE's P/E ratio is 2.82. In terms of profitability, MLHR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LIVE's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MLHR is more volatile compared to LIVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLHR.Check LIVE's competition here
MLHR vs LL Comparison April 2026
MLHR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLHR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, LL has a market cap of 25.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MLHR is priced at $38.66, while LL trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLHR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LL's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, MLHR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LL's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, MLHR is less volatile compared to LL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLHR.Check LL's competition here
MLHR vs LESL Comparison April 2026
MLHR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLHR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, LESL has a market cap of 14.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MLHR is priced at $38.66, while LESL trades at $1.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLHR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LESL's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, MLHR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LESL's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, MLHR is less volatile compared to LESL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLHR.Check LESL's competition here
MLHR vs HBP Comparison April 2026
MLHR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLHR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, HBP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MLHR is priced at $38.66, while HBP trades at $10.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLHR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HBP's P/E ratio is 6.07. In terms of profitability, MLHR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HBP's ROE of +0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, MLHR is more volatile compared to HBP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLHR.Check HBP's competition here
MLHR vs CAA Comparison April 2026
MLHR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLHR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, CAA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MLHR is priced at $38.66, while CAA trades at $53.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLHR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CAA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MLHR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CAA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MLHR is less volatile compared to CAA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLHR.Check CAA's competition here
MLHR vs FLE Comparison April 2026
MLHR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLHR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, FLE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MLHR is priced at $38.66, while FLE trades at $15,400.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLHR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MLHR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FLE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MLHR is more volatile compared to FLE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLHR.Check FLE's competition here