MillerKnoll, Inc. (NASDAQ: MLHR) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

MillerKnoll, Inc. (NASDAQ: MLHR) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MLHR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, HD has a market cap of 292.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MLHR is priced at $38.66 on the NASDAQ, while HD trades at $293.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MLHR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HD's P/E ratio is 20.12. In terms of profitability, MLHR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HD's ROE of +1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MLHR is less volatile compared to HD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLHR.Check HD's competition here

MillerKnoll, Inc. (NASDAQ: MLHR) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MLHR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, LOW has a market cap of 106.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MLHR is priced at $38.66 on the NASDAQ, while LOW trades at $189.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MLHR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LOW's P/E ratio is 15.26. In terms of profitability, MLHR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LOW's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, MLHR is less volatile compared to LOW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLHR.Check LOW's competition here

MillerKnoll, Inc. (NASDAQ: MLHR) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MLHR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, FND has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, MLHR is priced at $38.66 on the NASDAQ, while FND trades at $47.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MLHR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FND's P/E ratio is 25.58. In terms of profitability, MLHR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FND's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MLHR is less volatile compared to FND. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLHR.Check FND's competition here

MillerKnoll, Inc. (NASDAQ: MLHR) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MLHR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, HVT has a market cap of 463.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MLHR is priced at $38.66 on the NASDAQ, while HVT trades at $27.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MLHR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HVT's P/E ratio is 21.69. In terms of profitability, MLHR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HVT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MLHR is less volatile compared to HVT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLHR.Check HVT's competition here

MillerKnoll, Inc. (NASDAQ: MLHR) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MLHR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, HVT-A has a market cap of 413.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MLHR is priced at $38.66 on the NASDAQ, while HVT-A trades at $28.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MLHR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HVT-A's P/E ratio is 19.91. In terms of profitability, MLHR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HVT-A's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MLHR is more volatile compared to HVT-A. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLHR.Check HVT-A's competition here

MillerKnoll, Inc. (NASDAQ: MLHR) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MLHR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, TTSH has a market cap of 81.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MLHR is priced at $38.66 on the NASDAQ, while TTSH trades at $2.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MLHR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TTSH's P/E ratio is -14.57. In terms of profitability, MLHR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TTSH's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MLHR is less volatile compared to TTSH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLHR.Check TTSH's competition here

MillerKnoll, Inc. (NASDAQ: MLHR) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MLHR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, LL has a market cap of 25.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MLHR is priced at $38.66 on the NASDAQ, while LL trades at $0.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MLHR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LL's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, MLHR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LL's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, MLHR is less volatile compared to LL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLHR.Check LL's competition here

MillerKnoll, Inc. (NASDAQ: MLHR) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MLHR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, LIVE has a market cap of 23.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MLHR is priced at $38.66 on the NASDAQ, while LIVE trades at $7.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MLHR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LIVE's P/E ratio is 9.79. In terms of profitability, MLHR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LIVE's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MLHR is less volatile compared to LIVE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLHR.Check LIVE's competition here

MillerKnoll, Inc. (NASDAQ: MLHR) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MLHR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, TBHC has a market cap of 21.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MLHR is priced at $38.66 on the NASDAQ, while TBHC trades at $0.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MLHR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TBHC's P/E ratio is -0.69. In terms of profitability, MLHR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TBHC's ROE of +1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MLHR is less volatile compared to TBHC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLHR.Check TBHC's competition here

MillerKnoll, Inc. (NASDAQ: MLHR) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MLHR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, MWYN has a market cap of 19.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MLHR is priced at $38.66 on the NASDAQ, while MWYN trades at $0.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MLHR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MWYN's P/E ratio is -32.18. In terms of profitability, MLHR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MWYN's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, MLHR is less volatile compared to MWYN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLHR.Check MWYN's competition here

MillerKnoll, Inc. (NASDAQ: MLHR) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MLHR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, HBP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MLHR is priced at $38.66 on the NASDAQ, while HBP trades at $10.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MLHR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HBP's P/E ratio is 6.07. In terms of profitability, MLHR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HBP's ROE of +0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, MLHR is more volatile compared to HBP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLHR.Check HBP's competition here

MillerKnoll, Inc. (NASDAQ: MLHR) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MLHR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, CAA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MLHR is priced at $38.66 on the NASDAQ, while CAA trades at $53.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MLHR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CAA's P/E ratio is 9.95. In terms of profitability, MLHR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CAA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MLHR is less volatile compared to CAA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLHR.Check CAA's competition here

MillerKnoll, Inc. (NASDAQ: MLHR) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MLHR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, FLE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MLHR is priced at $38.66 on the NASDAQ, while FLE trades at $15,400.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MLHR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MLHR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FLE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MLHR is more volatile compared to FLE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLHR.Check FLE's competition here