Pinnacle Food Group Limited Class A Common Shares
Pinnacle Food Group Limited Class A Common Shares (PFAI) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (PFAI) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Home Improvement Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PFAI | $4.00 | +6.95% | 42.7M | -21.47 | -$0.17 | N/A |
| HD | $297.51 | -2.25% | 296.3B | 20.80 | $14.30 | +3.10% |
| LOW | $218.42 | -2.32% | 122.3B | 18.43 | $11.85 | +2.20% |
| FND | $43.49 | -4.98% | 4.7B | 23.64 | $1.84 | N/A |
| MLHR | $38.66 | +0.08% | 2.9B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| ARHS | $5.75 | -2.21% | 813.9M | 12.23 | $0.47 | +6.09% |
| HVT-A | $22.82 | -3.90% | 367.2M | 18.70 | $1.22 | +6.24% |
| HVT | $20.81 | -0.53% | 334.9M | 17.06 | $1.22 | +6.24% |
| EMPG | $17.36 | +0.00% | 143M | 192.89 | $0.09 | N/A |
| TTSH | $2.66 | -1.85% | 105.9M | -26.60 | -$0.10 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
PFAI vs HD Comparison May 2026
PFAI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PFAI stands at 42.7M. In comparison, HD has a market cap of 296.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PFAI is priced at $4.00, while HD trades at $297.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PFAI currently has a P/E ratio of -21.47, whereas HD's P/E ratio is 20.80. In terms of profitability, PFAI's ROE is -0.29%, compared to HD's ROE of +1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, PFAI is more volatile compared to HD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFAI.Check HD's competition here
PFAI vs LOW Comparison May 2026
PFAI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PFAI stands at 42.7M. In comparison, LOW has a market cap of 122.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PFAI is priced at $4.00, while LOW trades at $218.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PFAI currently has a P/E ratio of -21.47, whereas LOW's P/E ratio is 18.43. In terms of profitability, PFAI's ROE is -0.29%, compared to LOW's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, PFAI is more volatile compared to LOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFAI.Check LOW's competition here
PFAI vs FND Comparison May 2026
PFAI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PFAI stands at 42.7M. In comparison, FND has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PFAI is priced at $4.00, while FND trades at $43.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PFAI currently has a P/E ratio of -21.47, whereas FND's P/E ratio is 23.64. In terms of profitability, PFAI's ROE is -0.29%, compared to FND's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PFAI is more volatile compared to FND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFAI.Check FND's competition here
PFAI vs MLHR Comparison May 2026
PFAI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PFAI stands at 42.7M. In comparison, MLHR has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PFAI is priced at $4.00, while MLHR trades at $38.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PFAI currently has a P/E ratio of -21.47, whereas MLHR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PFAI's ROE is -0.29%, compared to MLHR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PFAI is more volatile compared to MLHR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFAI.Check MLHR's competition here
PFAI vs ARHS Comparison May 2026
PFAI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PFAI stands at 42.7M. In comparison, ARHS has a market cap of 813.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PFAI is priced at $4.00, while ARHS trades at $5.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PFAI currently has a P/E ratio of -21.47, whereas ARHS's P/E ratio is 12.23. In terms of profitability, PFAI's ROE is -0.29%, compared to ARHS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PFAI is more volatile compared to ARHS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFAI.Check ARHS's competition here
PFAI vs HVT-A Comparison May 2026
PFAI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PFAI stands at 42.7M. In comparison, HVT-A has a market cap of 367.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PFAI is priced at $4.00, while HVT-A trades at $22.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PFAI currently has a P/E ratio of -21.47, whereas HVT-A's P/E ratio is 18.70. In terms of profitability, PFAI's ROE is -0.29%, compared to HVT-A's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PFAI is more volatile compared to HVT-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFAI.Check HVT-A's competition here
PFAI vs HVT Comparison May 2026
PFAI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PFAI stands at 42.7M. In comparison, HVT has a market cap of 334.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PFAI is priced at $4.00, while HVT trades at $20.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PFAI currently has a P/E ratio of -21.47, whereas HVT's P/E ratio is 17.06. In terms of profitability, PFAI's ROE is -0.29%, compared to HVT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PFAI is more volatile compared to HVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFAI.Check HVT's competition here
PFAI vs EMPG Comparison May 2026
PFAI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PFAI stands at 42.7M. In comparison, EMPG has a market cap of 143M. Regarding current trading prices, PFAI is priced at $4.00, while EMPG trades at $17.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PFAI currently has a P/E ratio of -21.47, whereas EMPG's P/E ratio is 192.89. In terms of profitability, PFAI's ROE is -0.29%, compared to EMPG's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, PFAI is more volatile compared to EMPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFAI.Check EMPG's competition here
PFAI vs TTSH Comparison May 2026
PFAI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PFAI stands at 42.7M. In comparison, TTSH has a market cap of 105.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PFAI is priced at $4.00, while TTSH trades at $2.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PFAI currently has a P/E ratio of -21.47, whereas TTSH's P/E ratio is -26.60. In terms of profitability, PFAI's ROE is -0.29%, compared to TTSH's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PFAI is more volatile compared to TTSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFAI.Check TTSH's competition here
PFAI vs LIVE Comparison May 2026
PFAI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PFAI stands at 42.7M. In comparison, LIVE has a market cap of 30.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PFAI is priced at $4.00, while LIVE trades at $10.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PFAI currently has a P/E ratio of -21.47, whereas LIVE's P/E ratio is 2.10. In terms of profitability, PFAI's ROE is -0.29%, compared to LIVE's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PFAI is less volatile compared to LIVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFAI.Check LIVE's competition here
PFAI vs LESL Comparison May 2026
PFAI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PFAI stands at 42.7M. In comparison, LESL has a market cap of 28.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PFAI is priced at $4.00, while LESL trades at $3.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PFAI currently has a P/E ratio of -21.47, whereas LESL's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, PFAI's ROE is -0.29%, compared to LESL's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, PFAI is less volatile compared to LESL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFAI.Check LESL's competition here
PFAI vs LL Comparison May 2026
PFAI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PFAI stands at 42.7M. In comparison, LL has a market cap of 25.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PFAI is priced at $4.00, while LL trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PFAI currently has a P/E ratio of -21.47, whereas LL's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, PFAI's ROE is -0.29%, compared to LL's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, PFAI is less volatile compared to LL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFAI.Check LL's competition here
PFAI vs CAA Comparison May 2026
PFAI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PFAI stands at 42.7M. In comparison, CAA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PFAI is priced at $4.00, while CAA trades at $53.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PFAI currently has a P/E ratio of -21.47, whereas CAA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PFAI's ROE is -0.29%, compared to CAA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PFAI is more volatile compared to CAA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFAI.Check CAA's competition here
PFAI vs HBP Comparison May 2026
PFAI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PFAI stands at 42.7M. In comparison, HBP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PFAI is priced at $4.00, while HBP trades at $10.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PFAI currently has a P/E ratio of -21.47, whereas HBP's P/E ratio is 6.07. In terms of profitability, PFAI's ROE is -0.29%, compared to HBP's ROE of +0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, PFAI is more volatile compared to HBP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFAI.Check HBP's competition here
PFAI vs FLE Comparison May 2026
PFAI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PFAI stands at 42.7M. In comparison, FLE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PFAI is priced at $4.00, while FLE trades at $15,400.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PFAI currently has a P/E ratio of -21.47, whereas FLE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PFAI's ROE is -0.29%, compared to FLE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PFAI is more volatile compared to FLE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFAI.Check FLE's competition here