Pinnacle Food Group Limited Class A Common Shares (PFAI) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (PFAI) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Home Improvement Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PFAI | $3.60 | -3.74% | 42.5M | -21.29 | -$0.17 | N/A |
| HD | $348.86 | +1.12% | 347.4B | 23.91 | $14.57 | +2.67% |
| LOW | $222.48 | +0.25% | 124.8B | 17.95 | $12.40 | +2.17% |
| FND | $59.61 | +2.21% | 6.4B | 32.39 | $1.84 | N/A |
| MLHR | $38.66 | +0.08% | 2.9B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| ARHS | $8.41 | +3.83% | 1.2B | 17.89 | $0.47 | +4.19% |
| HVT-A | $28.09 | +0.00% | 434.1M | 18.03 | $1.56 | +5.20% |
| HVT | $25.81 | +2.67% | 415.2M | 21.50 | $1.20 | +5.20% |
| EMPG | $17.36 | +0.00% | 143M | 192.89 | $0.09 | N/A |
| TTSH | $3.00 | -2.91% | 119.5M | -28.28 | -$0.11 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
PFAI vs HD Comparison July 2026
PFAI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PFAI stands at 42.5M. In comparison, HD has a market cap of 347.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PFAI is priced at $3.60, while HD trades at $348.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PFAI currently has a P/E ratio of -21.29, whereas HD's P/E ratio is 23.91. In terms of profitability, PFAI's ROE is -0.29%, compared to HD's ROE of +1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PFAI is less volatile compared to HD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFAI.Check HD's competition here
PFAI vs LOW Comparison July 2026
PFAI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PFAI stands at 42.5M. In comparison, LOW has a market cap of 124.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PFAI is priced at $3.60, while LOW trades at $222.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PFAI currently has a P/E ratio of -21.29, whereas LOW's P/E ratio is 17.95. In terms of profitability, PFAI's ROE is -0.29%, compared to LOW's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, PFAI is less volatile compared to LOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFAI.Check LOW's competition here
PFAI vs FND Comparison July 2026
PFAI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PFAI stands at 42.5M. In comparison, FND has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PFAI is priced at $3.60, while FND trades at $59.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PFAI currently has a P/E ratio of -21.29, whereas FND's P/E ratio is 32.39. In terms of profitability, PFAI's ROE is -0.29%, compared to FND's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PFAI is less volatile compared to FND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFAI.Check FND's competition here
PFAI vs MLHR Comparison July 2026
PFAI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PFAI stands at 42.5M. In comparison, MLHR has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PFAI is priced at $3.60, while MLHR trades at $38.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PFAI currently has a P/E ratio of -21.29, whereas MLHR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PFAI's ROE is -0.29%, compared to MLHR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PFAI is less volatile compared to MLHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFAI.Check MLHR's competition here
PFAI vs ARHS Comparison July 2026
PFAI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PFAI stands at 42.5M. In comparison, ARHS has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PFAI is priced at $3.60, while ARHS trades at $8.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PFAI currently has a P/E ratio of -21.29, whereas ARHS's P/E ratio is 17.89. In terms of profitability, PFAI's ROE is -0.29%, compared to ARHS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PFAI is less volatile compared to ARHS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFAI.Check ARHS's competition here
PFAI vs HVT-A Comparison July 2026
PFAI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PFAI stands at 42.5M. In comparison, HVT-A has a market cap of 434.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PFAI is priced at $3.60, while HVT-A trades at $28.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PFAI currently has a P/E ratio of -21.29, whereas HVT-A's P/E ratio is 18.03. In terms of profitability, PFAI's ROE is -0.29%, compared to HVT-A's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PFAI is more volatile compared to HVT-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFAI.Check HVT-A's competition here
PFAI vs HVT Comparison July 2026
PFAI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PFAI stands at 42.5M. In comparison, HVT has a market cap of 415.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PFAI is priced at $3.60, while HVT trades at $25.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PFAI currently has a P/E ratio of -21.29, whereas HVT's P/E ratio is 21.50. In terms of profitability, PFAI's ROE is -0.29%, compared to HVT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PFAI is less volatile compared to HVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFAI.Check HVT's competition here
PFAI vs EMPG Comparison July 2026
PFAI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PFAI stands at 42.5M. In comparison, EMPG has a market cap of 143M. Regarding current trading prices, PFAI is priced at $3.60, while EMPG trades at $17.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PFAI currently has a P/E ratio of -21.29, whereas EMPG's P/E ratio is 192.89. In terms of profitability, PFAI's ROE is -0.29%, compared to EMPG's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, PFAI is more volatile compared to EMPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFAI.Check EMPG's competition here
PFAI vs TTSH Comparison July 2026
PFAI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PFAI stands at 42.5M. In comparison, TTSH has a market cap of 119.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PFAI is priced at $3.60, while TTSH trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PFAI currently has a P/E ratio of -21.29, whereas TTSH's P/E ratio is -28.28. In terms of profitability, PFAI's ROE is -0.29%, compared to TTSH's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PFAI is less volatile compared to TTSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFAI.Check TTSH's competition here
PFAI vs LESL Comparison July 2026
PFAI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PFAI stands at 42.5M. In comparison, LESL has a market cap of 89.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PFAI is priced at $3.60, while LESL trades at $9.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PFAI currently has a P/E ratio of -21.29, whereas LESL's P/E ratio is -1.47. In terms of profitability, PFAI's ROE is -0.29%, compared to LESL's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, PFAI is less volatile compared to LESL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFAI.Check LESL's competition here
PFAI vs LIVE Comparison July 2026
PFAI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PFAI stands at 42.5M. In comparison, LIVE has a market cap of 32.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PFAI is priced at $3.60, while LIVE trades at $10.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PFAI currently has a P/E ratio of -21.29, whereas LIVE's P/E ratio is 13.88. In terms of profitability, PFAI's ROE is -0.29%, compared to LIVE's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PFAI is less volatile compared to LIVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFAI.Check LIVE's competition here
PFAI vs LL Comparison July 2026
PFAI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PFAI stands at 42.5M. In comparison, LL has a market cap of 25.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PFAI is priced at $3.60, while LL trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PFAI currently has a P/E ratio of -21.29, whereas LL's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, PFAI's ROE is -0.29%, compared to LL's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, PFAI is less volatile compared to LL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFAI.Check LL's competition here
PFAI vs FLE Comparison July 2026
PFAI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PFAI stands at 42.5M. In comparison, FLE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PFAI is priced at $3.60, while FLE trades at $15,400.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PFAI currently has a P/E ratio of -21.29, whereas FLE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PFAI's ROE is -0.29%, compared to FLE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PFAI is more volatile compared to FLE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFAI.Check FLE's competition here
PFAI vs CAA Comparison July 2026
PFAI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PFAI stands at 42.5M. In comparison, CAA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PFAI is priced at $3.60, while CAA trades at $53.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PFAI currently has a P/E ratio of -21.29, whereas CAA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PFAI's ROE is -0.29%, compared to CAA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PFAI is less volatile compared to CAA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFAI.Check CAA's competition here
PFAI vs HBP Comparison July 2026
PFAI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PFAI stands at 42.5M. In comparison, HBP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PFAI is priced at $3.60, while HBP trades at $10.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PFAI currently has a P/E ratio of -21.29, whereas HBP's P/E ratio is 6.07. In terms of profitability, PFAI's ROE is -0.29%, compared to HBP's ROE of +0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, PFAI is more volatile compared to HBP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PFAI.Check HBP's competition here