Haverty Furniture Companies, Inc.
Haverty Furniture Companies, Inc. (HVT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (HVT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Home Improvement Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HVT | $22.33 | -1.50% | 361.8M | 18.78 | $1.19 | +5.81% |
| HD | $329.06 | -0.98% | 327.8B | 23.11 | $14.24 | +2.81% |
| LOW | $240.32 | -0.92% | 134.6B | 20.27 | $11.86 | +2.00% |
| FND | $49.41 | -0.80% | 5.3B | 25.73 | $1.92 | N/A |
| MLHR | $38.66 | +0.08% | 2.9B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| ARHS | $7.54 | +0.13% | 1.1B | 15.71 | $0.48 | +4.64% |
| HVT-A | $23.06 | +0.00% | 374M | 19.37 | $1.19 | +5.81% |
| EMPG | $17.36 | +0.00% | 143M | 192.89 | $0.09 | N/A |
| TTSH | $2.90 | +1.05% | 115.5M | -29.00 | -$0.10 | N/A |
| PFAI | $3.92 | -4.51% | 45.8M | -195.75 | -$0.02 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
HVT vs HD Comparison April 2026
HVT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HVT stands at 361.8M. In comparison, HD has a market cap of 327.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HVT is priced at $22.33, while HD trades at $329.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HVT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.78, whereas HD's P/E ratio is 23.11. In terms of profitability, HVT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to HD's ROE of +1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, HVT is more volatile compared to HD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HVT.Check HD's competition here
HVT vs LOW Comparison April 2026
HVT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HVT stands at 361.8M. In comparison, LOW has a market cap of 134.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HVT is priced at $22.33, while LOW trades at $240.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HVT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.78, whereas LOW's P/E ratio is 20.27. In terms of profitability, HVT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to LOW's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, HVT is more volatile compared to LOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HVT.Check LOW's competition here
HVT vs FND Comparison April 2026
HVT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HVT stands at 361.8M. In comparison, FND has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HVT is priced at $22.33, while FND trades at $49.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HVT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.78, whereas FND's P/E ratio is 25.73. In terms of profitability, HVT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to FND's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HVT is less volatile compared to FND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HVT.Check FND's competition here
HVT vs MLHR Comparison April 2026
HVT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HVT stands at 361.8M. In comparison, MLHR has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HVT is priced at $22.33, while MLHR trades at $38.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HVT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.78, whereas MLHR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HVT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MLHR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HVT is more volatile compared to MLHR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HVT.Check MLHR's competition here
HVT vs ARHS Comparison April 2026
HVT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HVT stands at 361.8M. In comparison, ARHS has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HVT is priced at $22.33, while ARHS trades at $7.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HVT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.78, whereas ARHS's P/E ratio is 15.71. In terms of profitability, HVT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ARHS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HVT is less volatile compared to ARHS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HVT.Check ARHS's competition here
HVT vs HVT-A Comparison April 2026
HVT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HVT stands at 361.8M. In comparison, HVT-A has a market cap of 374M. Regarding current trading prices, HVT is priced at $22.33, while HVT-A trades at $23.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HVT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.78, whereas HVT-A's P/E ratio is 19.37. In terms of profitability, HVT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to HVT-A's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HVT is more volatile compared to HVT-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HVT.Check HVT-A's competition here
HVT vs EMPG Comparison April 2026
HVT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HVT stands at 361.8M. In comparison, EMPG has a market cap of 143M. Regarding current trading prices, HVT is priced at $22.33, while EMPG trades at $17.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HVT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.78, whereas EMPG's P/E ratio is 192.89. In terms of profitability, HVT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to EMPG's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, HVT is more volatile compared to EMPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HVT.Check EMPG's competition here
HVT vs TTSH Comparison April 2026
HVT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HVT stands at 361.8M. In comparison, TTSH has a market cap of 115.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HVT is priced at $22.33, while TTSH trades at $2.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HVT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.78, whereas TTSH's P/E ratio is -29.00. In terms of profitability, HVT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TTSH's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HVT is less volatile compared to TTSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HVT.Check TTSH's competition here
HVT vs PFAI Comparison April 2026
HVT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HVT stands at 361.8M. In comparison, PFAI has a market cap of 45.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HVT is priced at $22.33, while PFAI trades at $3.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HVT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.78, whereas PFAI's P/E ratio is -195.75. In terms of profitability, HVT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PFAI's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, HVT is less volatile compared to PFAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HVT.Check PFAI's competition here
HVT vs LIVE Comparison April 2026
HVT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HVT stands at 361.8M. In comparison, LIVE has a market cap of 41.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HVT is priced at $22.33, while LIVE trades at $13.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HVT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.78, whereas LIVE's P/E ratio is 2.87. In terms of profitability, HVT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to LIVE's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, HVT is more volatile compared to LIVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HVT.Check LIVE's competition here
HVT vs LL Comparison April 2026
HVT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HVT stands at 361.8M. In comparison, LL has a market cap of 25.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HVT is priced at $22.33, while LL trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HVT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.78, whereas LL's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, HVT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to LL's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, HVT is less volatile compared to LL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HVT.Check LL's competition here
HVT vs LESL Comparison April 2026
HVT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HVT stands at 361.8M. In comparison, LESL has a market cap of 17.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HVT is priced at $22.33, while LESL trades at $1.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HVT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.78, whereas LESL's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, HVT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to LESL's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, HVT is less volatile compared to LESL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HVT.Check LESL's competition here
HVT vs HBP Comparison April 2026
HVT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HVT stands at 361.8M. In comparison, HBP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HVT is priced at $22.33, while HBP trades at $10.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HVT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.78, whereas HBP's P/E ratio is 6.07. In terms of profitability, HVT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to HBP's ROE of +0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, HVT is more volatile compared to HBP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HVT.Check HBP's competition here
HVT vs CAA Comparison April 2026
HVT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HVT stands at 361.8M. In comparison, CAA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HVT is priced at $22.33, while CAA trades at $53.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HVT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.78, whereas CAA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HVT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CAA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HVT is less volatile compared to CAA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HVT.Check CAA's competition here
HVT vs FLE Comparison April 2026
HVT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HVT stands at 361.8M. In comparison, FLE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HVT is priced at $22.33, while FLE trades at $15,400.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HVT currently has a P/E ratio of 18.78, whereas FLE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HVT's ROE is +0.03%, compared to FLE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HVT is more volatile compared to FLE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HVT.Check FLE's competition here