Live Ventures Incorporated (LIVE) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (LIVE) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Home Improvement Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LIVE | $10.00 | -6.45% | 32M | 13.53 | $0.77 | N/A |
| HD | $350.81 | +0.56% | 349.6B | 24.06 | $14.57 | +2.65% |
| LOW | $219.65 | -1.27% | 123.1B | 17.71 | $12.40 | +2.18% |
| FND | $58.54 | -1.80% | 6.3B | 31.81 | $1.84 | N/A |
| MLHR | $38.66 | +0.08% | 2.9B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| ARHS | $8.42 | +0.12% | 1.2B | 17.91 | $0.47 | +4.07% |
| HVT-A | $28.21 | +0.43% | 417.2M | 18.11 | $1.56 | +5.13% |
| HVT | $25.48 | -1.28% | 409.8M | 21.22 | $1.20 | +5.13% |
| EMPG | $17.36 | +0.00% | 143M | 192.89 | $0.09 | N/A |
| TTSH | $2.99 | -0.33% | 119.1M | -28.19 | -$0.11 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
LIVE vs HD Comparison July 2026
LIVE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIVE stands at 32M. In comparison, HD has a market cap of 349.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LIVE is priced at $10.00, while HD trades at $350.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIVE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.53, whereas HD's P/E ratio is 24.06. In terms of profitability, LIVE's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HD's ROE of +1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LIVE is more volatile compared to HD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIVE.Check HD's competition here
LIVE vs LOW Comparison July 2026
LIVE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIVE stands at 32M. In comparison, LOW has a market cap of 123.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LIVE is priced at $10.00, while LOW trades at $219.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIVE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.53, whereas LOW's P/E ratio is 17.71. In terms of profitability, LIVE's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LOW's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, LIVE is more volatile compared to LOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIVE.Check LOW's competition here
LIVE vs FND Comparison July 2026
LIVE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIVE stands at 32M. In comparison, FND has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LIVE is priced at $10.00, while FND trades at $58.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIVE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.53, whereas FND's P/E ratio is 31.81. In terms of profitability, LIVE's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FND's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LIVE is less volatile compared to FND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIVE.Check FND's competition here
LIVE vs MLHR Comparison July 2026
LIVE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIVE stands at 32M. In comparison, MLHR has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LIVE is priced at $10.00, while MLHR trades at $38.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIVE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.53, whereas MLHR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIVE's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MLHR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LIVE is more volatile compared to MLHR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIVE.Check MLHR's competition here
LIVE vs ARHS Comparison July 2026
LIVE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIVE stands at 32M. In comparison, ARHS has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LIVE is priced at $10.00, while ARHS trades at $8.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIVE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.53, whereas ARHS's P/E ratio is 17.91. In terms of profitability, LIVE's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ARHS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LIVE is less volatile compared to ARHS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIVE.Check ARHS's competition here
LIVE vs HVT-A Comparison July 2026
LIVE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIVE stands at 32M. In comparison, HVT-A has a market cap of 417.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LIVE is priced at $10.00, while HVT-A trades at $28.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIVE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.53, whereas HVT-A's P/E ratio is 18.11. In terms of profitability, LIVE's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HVT-A's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LIVE is less volatile compared to HVT-A. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIVE.Check HVT-A's competition here
LIVE vs HVT Comparison July 2026
LIVE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIVE stands at 32M. In comparison, HVT has a market cap of 409.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LIVE is priced at $10.00, while HVT trades at $25.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIVE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.53, whereas HVT's P/E ratio is 21.22. In terms of profitability, LIVE's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HVT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LIVE is less volatile compared to HVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIVE.Check HVT's competition here
LIVE vs EMPG Comparison July 2026
LIVE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIVE stands at 32M. In comparison, EMPG has a market cap of 143M. Regarding current trading prices, LIVE is priced at $10.00, while EMPG trades at $17.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIVE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.53, whereas EMPG's P/E ratio is 192.89. In terms of profitability, LIVE's ROE is +0.04%, compared to EMPG's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, LIVE is more volatile compared to EMPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIVE.Check EMPG's competition here
LIVE vs TTSH Comparison July 2026
LIVE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIVE stands at 32M. In comparison, TTSH has a market cap of 119.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LIVE is priced at $10.00, while TTSH trades at $2.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIVE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.53, whereas TTSH's P/E ratio is -28.19. In terms of profitability, LIVE's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TTSH's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LIVE is more volatile compared to TTSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIVE.Check TTSH's competition here
LIVE vs LESL Comparison July 2026
LIVE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIVE stands at 32M. In comparison, LESL has a market cap of 100.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LIVE is priced at $10.00, while LESL trades at $10.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIVE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.53, whereas LESL's P/E ratio is -1.65. In terms of profitability, LIVE's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LESL's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, LIVE is less volatile compared to LESL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIVE.Check LESL's competition here
LIVE vs PFAI Comparison July 2026
LIVE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIVE stands at 32M. In comparison, PFAI has a market cap of 43.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LIVE is priced at $10.00, while PFAI trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIVE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.53, whereas PFAI's P/E ratio is -21.76. In terms of profitability, LIVE's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PFAI's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, LIVE is less volatile compared to PFAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIVE.Check PFAI's competition here
LIVE vs LL Comparison July 2026
LIVE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIVE stands at 32M. In comparison, LL has a market cap of 25.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LIVE is priced at $10.00, while LL trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIVE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.53, whereas LL's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, LIVE's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LL's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, LIVE is less volatile compared to LL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIVE.Check LL's competition here
LIVE vs FLE Comparison July 2026
LIVE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIVE stands at 32M. In comparison, FLE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LIVE is priced at $10.00, while FLE trades at $15,400.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIVE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.53, whereas FLE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIVE's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FLE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LIVE is more volatile compared to FLE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIVE.Check FLE's competition here
LIVE vs HBP Comparison July 2026
LIVE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIVE stands at 32M. In comparison, HBP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LIVE is priced at $10.00, while HBP trades at $10.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIVE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.53, whereas HBP's P/E ratio is 6.07. In terms of profitability, LIVE's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HBP's ROE of +0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, LIVE is more volatile compared to HBP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIVE.Check HBP's competition here
LIVE vs CAA Comparison July 2026
LIVE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIVE stands at 32M. In comparison, CAA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LIVE is priced at $10.00, while CAA trades at $53.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIVE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.53, whereas CAA's P/E ratio is 15.73. In terms of profitability, LIVE's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CAA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LIVE is less volatile compared to CAA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIVE.Check CAA's competition here