Live Ventures Incorporated
Live Ventures Incorporated (LIVE) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (LIVE) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Home Improvement Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LIVE | $13.25 | -0.59% | 40.2M | 2.75 | $4.75 | N/A |
| HD | $332.30 | -1.07% | 330.9B | 23.33 | $14.24 | +2.77% |
| LOW | $242.55 | -0.78% | 135.8B | 20.45 | $11.86 | +1.97% |
| FND | $49.81 | -2.49% | 5.4B | 25.93 | $1.92 | N/A |
| MLHR | $38.66 | +0.08% | 2.9B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| ARHS | $7.53 | -1.57% | 1.1B | 15.70 | $0.48 | +4.64% |
| HVT-A | $23.06 | -3.53% | 374M | 19.37 | $1.19 | +5.72% |
| HVT | $22.67 | -0.18% | 367.9M | 19.10 | $1.19 | +5.72% |
| EMPG | $17.36 | +0.00% | 143M | 192.89 | $0.09 | N/A |
| TTSH | $2.87 | -2.71% | 114.3M | -28.70 | -$0.10 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
LIVE vs HD Comparison April 2026
LIVE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIVE stands at 40.2M. In comparison, HD has a market cap of 330.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LIVE is priced at $13.25, while HD trades at $332.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIVE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.75, whereas HD's P/E ratio is 23.33. In terms of profitability, LIVE's ROE is +0.24%, compared to HD's ROE of +1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LIVE is more volatile compared to HD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIVE.Check HD's competition here
LIVE vs LOW Comparison April 2026
LIVE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIVE stands at 40.2M. In comparison, LOW has a market cap of 135.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LIVE is priced at $13.25, while LOW trades at $242.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIVE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.75, whereas LOW's P/E ratio is 20.45. In terms of profitability, LIVE's ROE is +0.24%, compared to LOW's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, LIVE is more volatile compared to LOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIVE.Check LOW's competition here
LIVE vs FND Comparison April 2026
LIVE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIVE stands at 40.2M. In comparison, FND has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LIVE is priced at $13.25, while FND trades at $49.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIVE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.75, whereas FND's P/E ratio is 25.93. In terms of profitability, LIVE's ROE is +0.24%, compared to FND's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LIVE is less volatile compared to FND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIVE.Check FND's competition here
LIVE vs MLHR Comparison April 2026
LIVE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIVE stands at 40.2M. In comparison, MLHR has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LIVE is priced at $13.25, while MLHR trades at $38.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIVE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.75, whereas MLHR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIVE's ROE is +0.24%, compared to MLHR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LIVE is more volatile compared to MLHR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIVE.Check MLHR's competition here
LIVE vs ARHS Comparison April 2026
LIVE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIVE stands at 40.2M. In comparison, ARHS has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LIVE is priced at $13.25, while ARHS trades at $7.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIVE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.75, whereas ARHS's P/E ratio is 15.70. In terms of profitability, LIVE's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ARHS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LIVE is more volatile compared to ARHS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIVE.Check ARHS's competition here
LIVE vs HVT-A Comparison April 2026
LIVE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIVE stands at 40.2M. In comparison, HVT-A has a market cap of 374M. Regarding current trading prices, LIVE is priced at $13.25, while HVT-A trades at $23.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIVE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.75, whereas HVT-A's P/E ratio is 19.37. In terms of profitability, LIVE's ROE is +0.24%, compared to HVT-A's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LIVE is more volatile compared to HVT-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIVE.Check HVT-A's competition here
LIVE vs HVT Comparison April 2026
LIVE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIVE stands at 40.2M. In comparison, HVT has a market cap of 367.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LIVE is priced at $13.25, while HVT trades at $22.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIVE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.75, whereas HVT's P/E ratio is 19.10. In terms of profitability, LIVE's ROE is +0.24%, compared to HVT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LIVE is more volatile compared to HVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIVE.Check HVT's competition here
LIVE vs EMPG Comparison April 2026
LIVE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIVE stands at 40.2M. In comparison, EMPG has a market cap of 143M. Regarding current trading prices, LIVE is priced at $13.25, while EMPG trades at $17.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIVE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.75, whereas EMPG's P/E ratio is 192.89. In terms of profitability, LIVE's ROE is +0.24%, compared to EMPG's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, LIVE is more volatile compared to EMPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIVE.Check EMPG's competition here
LIVE vs TTSH Comparison April 2026
LIVE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIVE stands at 40.2M. In comparison, TTSH has a market cap of 114.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LIVE is priced at $13.25, while TTSH trades at $2.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIVE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.75, whereas TTSH's P/E ratio is -28.70. In terms of profitability, LIVE's ROE is +0.24%, compared to TTSH's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LIVE is less volatile compared to TTSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIVE.Check TTSH's competition here
LIVE vs PFAI Comparison April 2026
LIVE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIVE stands at 40.2M. In comparison, PFAI has a market cap of 46.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LIVE is priced at $13.25, while PFAI trades at $4.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIVE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.75, whereas PFAI's P/E ratio is -197.00. In terms of profitability, LIVE's ROE is +0.24%, compared to PFAI's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, LIVE is less volatile compared to PFAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIVE.Check PFAI's competition here
LIVE vs LL Comparison April 2026
LIVE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIVE stands at 40.2M. In comparison, LL has a market cap of 25.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LIVE is priced at $13.25, while LL trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIVE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.75, whereas LL's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, LIVE's ROE is +0.24%, compared to LL's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, LIVE is less volatile compared to LL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIVE.Check LL's competition here
LIVE vs LESL Comparison April 2026
LIVE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIVE stands at 40.2M. In comparison, LESL has a market cap of 19.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LIVE is priced at $13.25, while LESL trades at $2.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIVE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.75, whereas LESL's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, LIVE's ROE is +0.24%, compared to LESL's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, LIVE is less volatile compared to LESL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIVE.Check LESL's competition here
LIVE vs HBP Comparison April 2026
LIVE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIVE stands at 40.2M. In comparison, HBP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LIVE is priced at $13.25, while HBP trades at $10.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIVE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.75, whereas HBP's P/E ratio is 6.07. In terms of profitability, LIVE's ROE is +0.24%, compared to HBP's ROE of +0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, LIVE is more volatile compared to HBP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIVE.Check HBP's competition here
LIVE vs FLE Comparison April 2026
LIVE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIVE stands at 40.2M. In comparison, FLE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LIVE is priced at $13.25, while FLE trades at $15,400.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIVE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.75, whereas FLE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIVE's ROE is +0.24%, compared to FLE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LIVE is more volatile compared to FLE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIVE.Check FLE's competition here
LIVE vs CAA Comparison April 2026
LIVE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIVE stands at 40.2M. In comparison, CAA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LIVE is priced at $13.25, while CAA trades at $53.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIVE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.75, whereas CAA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIVE's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CAA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LIVE is less volatile compared to CAA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIVE.Check CAA's competition here