TETRA Technologies, Inc.
TETRA Technologies, Inc. (TTI) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (TTI) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Equipment & Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TTI | $3.77 | +1.34% | 501.7M | 4.28 | $0.88 | N/A |
| SLB | $36.00 | +1.48% | 54B | 12.33 | $2.92 | +3.14% |
| BKR | $46.55 | +1.09% | 45.9B | 15.22 | $3.06 | +1.91% |
| TS | $38.02 | -0.13% | 20.1B | 11.59 | $3.28 | +5.77% |
| HAL | $22.84 | +1.74% | 19.6B | 10.72 | $2.13 | +3.01% |
| FTI | $36.81 | +0.99% | 15.1B | 17.53 | $2.10 | +0.54% |
| NOV | $14.18 | +1.50% | 5.3B | 9.51 | $1.49 | +3.66% |
| CHX | $25.81 | -2.97% | 4.9B | 17.09 | $1.51 | +1.47% |
| WFRD | $58.97 | +3.71% | 4.2B | 9.09 | $6.49 | +1.75% |
| AROC | $23.31 | +0.04% | 4.1B | 19.58 | $1.19 | +3.08% |
Stock Comparison
TTI vs SLB Comparison July 2025
TTI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTI stands at 501.7M. In comparison, SLB has a market cap of 54B. Regarding current trading prices, TTI is priced at $3.77, while SLB trades at $36.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTI currently has a P/E ratio of 4.28, whereas SLB's P/E ratio is 12.33. In terms of profitability, TTI's ROE is +0.53%, compared to SLB's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TTI is more volatile compared to SLB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTI.Check SLB's competition here
TTI vs BKR Comparison July 2025
TTI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTI stands at 501.7M. In comparison, BKR has a market cap of 45.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TTI is priced at $3.77, while BKR trades at $46.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTI currently has a P/E ratio of 4.28, whereas BKR's P/E ratio is 15.22. In terms of profitability, TTI's ROE is +0.53%, compared to BKR's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TTI is more volatile compared to BKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTI.Check BKR's competition here
TTI vs TS Comparison July 2025
TTI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTI stands at 501.7M. In comparison, TS has a market cap of 20.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TTI is priced at $3.77, while TS trades at $38.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTI currently has a P/E ratio of 4.28, whereas TS's P/E ratio is 11.59. In terms of profitability, TTI's ROE is +0.53%, compared to TS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TTI is more volatile compared to TS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTI.Check TS's competition here
TTI vs HAL Comparison July 2025
TTI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTI stands at 501.7M. In comparison, HAL has a market cap of 19.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TTI is priced at $3.77, while HAL trades at $22.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTI currently has a P/E ratio of 4.28, whereas HAL's P/E ratio is 10.72. In terms of profitability, TTI's ROE is +0.53%, compared to HAL's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TTI is more volatile compared to HAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTI.Check HAL's competition here
TTI vs FTI Comparison July 2025
TTI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTI stands at 501.7M. In comparison, FTI has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TTI is priced at $3.77, while FTI trades at $36.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTI currently has a P/E ratio of 4.28, whereas FTI's P/E ratio is 17.53. In terms of profitability, TTI's ROE is +0.53%, compared to FTI's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, TTI is more volatile compared to FTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTI.Check FTI's competition here
TTI vs NOV Comparison July 2025
TTI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTI stands at 501.7M. In comparison, NOV has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TTI is priced at $3.77, while NOV trades at $14.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTI currently has a P/E ratio of 4.28, whereas NOV's P/E ratio is 9.51. In terms of profitability, TTI's ROE is +0.53%, compared to NOV's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TTI is more volatile compared to NOV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTI.Check NOV's competition here
TTI vs CHX Comparison July 2025
TTI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTI stands at 501.7M. In comparison, CHX has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TTI is priced at $3.77, while CHX trades at $25.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTI currently has a P/E ratio of 4.28, whereas CHX's P/E ratio is 17.09. In terms of profitability, TTI's ROE is +0.53%, compared to CHX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TTI is more volatile compared to CHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTI.Check CHX's competition here
TTI vs WFRD Comparison July 2025
TTI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTI stands at 501.7M. In comparison, WFRD has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TTI is priced at $3.77, while WFRD trades at $58.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTI currently has a P/E ratio of 4.28, whereas WFRD's P/E ratio is 9.09. In terms of profitability, TTI's ROE is +0.53%, compared to WFRD's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, TTI is more volatile compared to WFRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTI.Check WFRD's competition here
TTI vs AROC Comparison July 2025
TTI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTI stands at 501.7M. In comparison, AROC has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TTI is priced at $3.77, while AROC trades at $23.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTI currently has a P/E ratio of 4.28, whereas AROC's P/E ratio is 19.58. In terms of profitability, TTI's ROE is +0.53%, compared to AROC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TTI is more volatile compared to AROC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTI.Check AROC's competition here
TTI vs VAL-WT Comparison July 2025
TTI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTI stands at 501.7M. In comparison, VAL-WT has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TTI is priced at $3.77, while VAL-WT trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTI currently has a P/E ratio of 4.28, whereas VAL-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TTI's ROE is +0.53%, compared to VAL-WT's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TTI is less volatile compared to VAL-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTI.Check VAL-WT's competition here
TTI vs VAL Comparison July 2025
TTI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTI stands at 501.7M. In comparison, VAL has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TTI is priced at $3.77, while VAL trades at $51.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTI currently has a P/E ratio of 4.28, whereas VAL's P/E ratio is 12.17. In terms of profitability, TTI's ROE is +0.53%, compared to VAL's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TTI is more volatile compared to VAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTI.Check VAL's competition here
TTI vs WHD Comparison July 2025
TTI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTI stands at 501.7M. In comparison, WHD has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TTI is priced at $3.77, while WHD trades at $47.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTI currently has a P/E ratio of 4.28, whereas WHD's P/E ratio is 17.01. In terms of profitability, TTI's ROE is +0.53%, compared to WHD's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TTI is more volatile compared to WHD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTI.Check WHD's competition here
TTI vs USAC Comparison July 2025
TTI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTI stands at 501.7M. In comparison, USAC has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TTI is priced at $3.77, while USAC trades at $24.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTI currently has a P/E ratio of 4.28, whereas USAC's P/E ratio is 35.81. In terms of profitability, TTI's ROE is +0.53%, compared to USAC's ROE of +1.96%. Regarding short-term risk, TTI is more volatile compared to USAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTI.Check USAC's competition here
TTI vs KGS Comparison July 2025
TTI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTI stands at 501.7M. In comparison, KGS has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TTI is priced at $3.77, while KGS trades at $31.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTI currently has a P/E ratio of 4.28, whereas KGS's P/E ratio is 63.26. In terms of profitability, TTI's ROE is +0.53%, compared to KGS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TTI is more volatile compared to KGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTI.Check KGS's competition here
TTI vs TDW-WT Comparison July 2025
TTI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTI stands at 501.7M. In comparison, TDW-WT has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TTI is priced at $3.77, while TDW-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTI currently has a P/E ratio of 4.28, whereas TDW-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TTI's ROE is +0.53%, compared to TDW-WT's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TTI is more volatile compared to TDW-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTI.Check TDW-WT's competition here
TTI vs TDW Comparison July 2025
TTI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTI stands at 501.7M. In comparison, TDW has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TTI is priced at $3.77, while TDW trades at $52.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTI currently has a P/E ratio of 4.28, whereas TDW's P/E ratio is 15.86. In terms of profitability, TTI's ROE is +0.53%, compared to TDW's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TTI is more volatile compared to TDW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTI.Check TDW's competition here
TTI vs NEX Comparison July 2025
TTI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTI stands at 501.7M. In comparison, NEX has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TTI is priced at $3.77, while NEX trades at $10.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTI currently has a P/E ratio of 4.28, whereas NEX's P/E ratio is 3.94. In terms of profitability, TTI's ROE is +0.53%, compared to NEX's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, TTI is less volatile compared to NEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTI.Check NEX's competition here
TTI vs OII Comparison July 2025
TTI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTI stands at 501.7M. In comparison, OII has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TTI is priced at $3.77, while OII trades at $22.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTI currently has a P/E ratio of 4.28, whereas OII's P/E ratio is 11.58. In terms of profitability, TTI's ROE is +0.53%, compared to OII's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TTI is more volatile compared to OII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTI.Check OII's competition here
TTI vs SEI Comparison July 2025
TTI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTI stands at 501.7M. In comparison, SEI has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TTI is priced at $3.77, while SEI trades at $32.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTI currently has a P/E ratio of 4.28, whereas SEI's P/E ratio is 65.19. In terms of profitability, TTI's ROE is +0.53%, compared to SEI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TTI is less volatile compared to SEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTI.Check SEI's competition here
TTI vs LBRT Comparison July 2025
TTI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTI stands at 501.7M. In comparison, LBRT has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TTI is priced at $3.77, while LBRT trades at $13.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTI currently has a P/E ratio of 4.28, whereas LBRT's P/E ratio is 10.05. In terms of profitability, TTI's ROE is +0.53%, compared to LBRT's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TTI is less volatile compared to LBRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTI.Check LBRT's competition here
TTI vs FLOC Comparison July 2025
TTI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTI stands at 501.7M. In comparison, FLOC has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TTI is priced at $3.77, while FLOC trades at $20.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTI currently has a P/E ratio of 4.28, whereas FLOC's P/E ratio is 26.38. In terms of profitability, TTI's ROE is +0.53%, compared to FLOC's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, TTI is more volatile compared to FLOC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTI.Check FLOC's competition here
TTI vs AESI Comparison July 2025
TTI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTI stands at 501.7M. In comparison, AESI has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TTI is priced at $3.77, while AESI trades at $14.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTI currently has a P/E ratio of 4.28, whereas AESI's P/E ratio is 47.23. In terms of profitability, TTI's ROE is +0.53%, compared to AESI's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TTI is more volatile compared to AESI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTI.Check AESI's competition here
TTI vs DNOW Comparison July 2025
TTI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTI stands at 501.7M. In comparison, DNOW has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TTI is priced at $3.77, while DNOW trades at $15.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTI currently has a P/E ratio of 4.28, whereas DNOW's P/E ratio is 21.11. In terms of profitability, TTI's ROE is +0.53%, compared to DNOW's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TTI is less volatile compared to DNOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTI.Check DNOW's competition here
TTI vs ACDC Comparison July 2025
TTI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTI stands at 501.7M. In comparison, ACDC has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TTI is priced at $3.77, while ACDC trades at $8.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTI currently has a P/E ratio of 4.28, whereas ACDC's P/E ratio is -5.42. In terms of profitability, TTI's ROE is +0.53%, compared to ACDC's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TTI is less volatile compared to ACDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTI.Check ACDC's competition here
TTI vs MRC Comparison July 2025
TTI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTI stands at 501.7M. In comparison, MRC has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TTI is priced at $3.77, while MRC trades at $15.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTI currently has a P/E ratio of 4.28, whereas MRC's P/E ratio is 30.08. In terms of profitability, TTI's ROE is +0.53%, compared to MRC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TTI is less volatile compared to MRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTI.Check MRC's competition here
TTI vs LB Comparison July 2025
TTI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTI stands at 501.7M. In comparison, LB has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TTI is priced at $3.77, while LB trades at $54.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTI currently has a P/E ratio of 4.28, whereas LB's P/E ratio is -18.92. In terms of profitability, TTI's ROE is +0.53%, compared to LB's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TTI is less volatile compared to LB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTI.Check LB's competition here
TTI vs SLCA Comparison July 2025
TTI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTI stands at 501.7M. In comparison, SLCA has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TTI is priced at $3.77, while SLCA trades at $15.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTI currently has a P/E ratio of 4.28, whereas SLCA's P/E ratio is 10.54. In terms of profitability, TTI's ROE is +0.53%, compared to SLCA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TTI is more volatile compared to SLCA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTI.Check SLCA's competition here
TTI vs INVX Comparison July 2025
TTI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTI stands at 501.7M. In comparison, INVX has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TTI is priced at $3.77, while INVX trades at $17.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTI currently has a P/E ratio of 4.28, whereas INVX's P/E ratio is 8.78. In terms of profitability, TTI's ROE is +0.53%, compared to INVX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TTI is less volatile compared to INVX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTI.Check INVX's competition here
TTI vs PFHC Comparison July 2025
TTI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTI stands at 501.7M. In comparison, PFHC has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TTI is priced at $3.77, while PFHC trades at $22.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTI currently has a P/E ratio of 4.28, whereas PFHC's P/E ratio is 105.14. In terms of profitability, TTI's ROE is +0.53%, compared to PFHC's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TTI is more volatile compared to PFHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTI.Check PFHC's competition here
TTI vs RES Comparison July 2025
TTI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTI stands at 501.7M. In comparison, RES has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TTI is priced at $3.77, while RES trades at $4.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTI currently has a P/E ratio of 4.28, whereas RES's P/E ratio is 19.80. In terms of profitability, TTI's ROE is +0.53%, compared to RES's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TTI is more volatile compared to RES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTI.Check RES's competition here
TTI vs VTOL Comparison July 2025
TTI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTI stands at 501.7M. In comparison, VTOL has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, TTI is priced at $3.77, while VTOL trades at $36.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTI currently has a P/E ratio of 4.28, whereas VTOL's P/E ratio is 9.29. In terms of profitability, TTI's ROE is +0.53%, compared to VTOL's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TTI is more volatile compared to VTOL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTI.Check VTOL's competition here
TTI vs XPRO Comparison July 2025
TTI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTI stands at 501.7M. In comparison, XPRO has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, TTI is priced at $3.77, while XPRO trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTI currently has a P/E ratio of 4.28, whereas XPRO's P/E ratio is 15.25. In terms of profitability, TTI's ROE is +0.53%, compared to XPRO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TTI is less volatile compared to XPRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTI.Check XPRO's competition here
TTI vs WTTR Comparison July 2025
TTI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTI stands at 501.7M. In comparison, WTTR has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, TTI is priced at $3.77, while WTTR trades at $9.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTI currently has a P/E ratio of 4.28, whereas WTTR's P/E ratio is 28.78. In terms of profitability, TTI's ROE is +0.53%, compared to WTTR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TTI is more volatile compared to WTTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTI.Check WTTR's competition here
TTI vs EFXT Comparison July 2025
TTI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTI stands at 501.7M. In comparison, EFXT has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, TTI is priced at $3.77, while EFXT trades at $8.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTI currently has a P/E ratio of 4.28, whereas EFXT's P/E ratio is 13.55. In terms of profitability, TTI's ROE is +0.53%, compared to EFXT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TTI is more volatile compared to EFXT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTI.Check EFXT's competition here
TTI vs HLX Comparison July 2025
TTI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTI stands at 501.7M. In comparison, HLX has a market cap of 917.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TTI is priced at $3.77, while HLX trades at $6.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTI currently has a P/E ratio of 4.28, whereas HLX's P/E ratio is 19.50. In terms of profitability, TTI's ROE is +0.53%, compared to HLX's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TTI is less volatile compared to HLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTI.Check HLX's competition here
TTI vs NPKI Comparison July 2025
TTI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTI stands at 501.7M. In comparison, NPKI has a market cap of 770.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TTI is priced at $3.77, while NPKI trades at $9.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTI currently has a P/E ratio of 4.28, whereas NPKI's P/E ratio is 19.00. In terms of profitability, TTI's ROE is +0.53%, compared to NPKI's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, TTI is more volatile compared to NPKI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTI.Check NPKI's competition here
TTI vs NESR Comparison July 2025
TTI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTI stands at 501.7M. In comparison, NESR has a market cap of 701.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TTI is priced at $3.77, while NESR trades at $7.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTI currently has a P/E ratio of 4.28, whereas NESR's P/E ratio is 8.77. In terms of profitability, TTI's ROE is +0.53%, compared to NESR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TTI is less volatile compared to NESR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTI.Check NESR's competition here
TTI vs PUMP Comparison July 2025
TTI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTI stands at 501.7M. In comparison, PUMP has a market cap of 641.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TTI is priced at $3.77, while PUMP trades at $6.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTI currently has a P/E ratio of 4.28, whereas PUMP's P/E ratio is -4.41. In terms of profitability, TTI's ROE is +0.53%, compared to PUMP's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TTI is less volatile compared to PUMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTI.Check PUMP's competition here
TTI vs NR Comparison July 2025
TTI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTI stands at 501.7M. In comparison, NR has a market cap of 627.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TTI is priced at $3.77, while NR trades at $7.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTI currently has a P/E ratio of 4.28, whereas NR's P/E ratio is 19.08. In terms of profitability, TTI's ROE is +0.53%, compared to NR's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, TTI is less volatile compared to NR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTI.Check NR's competition here
TTI vs NESRW Comparison July 2025
TTI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTI stands at 501.7M. In comparison, NESRW has a market cap of 564.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TTI is priced at $3.77, while NESRW trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTI currently has a P/E ratio of 4.28, whereas NESRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TTI's ROE is +0.53%, compared to NESRW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TTI is less volatile compared to NESRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTI.Check NESRW's competition here
TTI vs CLB Comparison July 2025
TTI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTI stands at 501.7M. In comparison, CLB has a market cap of 560.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TTI is priced at $3.77, while CLB trades at $11.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTI currently has a P/E ratio of 4.28, whereas CLB's P/E ratio is 19.28. In terms of profitability, TTI's ROE is +0.53%, compared to CLB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TTI is more volatile compared to CLB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTI.Check CLB's competition here
TTI vs DRQ Comparison July 2025
TTI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTI stands at 501.7M. In comparison, DRQ has a market cap of 530.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TTI is priced at $3.77, while DRQ trades at $15.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTI currently has a P/E ratio of 4.28, whereas DRQ's P/E ratio is -19.76. In terms of profitability, TTI's ROE is +0.53%, compared to DRQ's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TTI is less volatile compared to DRQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTI.Check DRQ's competition here
TTI vs SOI Comparison July 2025
TTI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTI stands at 501.7M. In comparison, SOI has a market cap of 498.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TTI is priced at $3.77, while SOI trades at $11.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTI currently has a P/E ratio of 4.28, whereas SOI's P/E ratio is 17.15. In terms of profitability, TTI's ROE is +0.53%, compared to SOI's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TTI is more volatile compared to SOI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTI.Check SOI's competition here
TTI vs NOA Comparison July 2025
TTI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTI stands at 501.7M. In comparison, NOA has a market cap of 454.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TTI is priced at $3.77, while NOA trades at $15.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTI currently has a P/E ratio of 4.28, whereas NOA's P/E ratio is 15.76. In terms of profitability, TTI's ROE is +0.53%, compared to NOA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TTI is more volatile compared to NOA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTI.Check NOA's competition here
TTI vs FTK Comparison July 2025
TTI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTI stands at 501.7M. In comparison, FTK has a market cap of 362.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TTI is priced at $3.77, while FTK trades at $12.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTI currently has a P/E ratio of 4.28, whereas FTK's P/E ratio is 26.37. In terms of profitability, TTI's ROE is +0.53%, compared to FTK's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TTI is more volatile compared to FTK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTI.Check FTK's competition here
TTI vs OIS Comparison July 2025
TTI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTI stands at 501.7M. In comparison, OIS has a market cap of 361.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TTI is priced at $3.77, while OIS trades at $5.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTI currently has a P/E ratio of 4.28, whereas OIS's P/E ratio is 73.06. In terms of profitability, TTI's ROE is +0.53%, compared to OIS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TTI is more volatile compared to OIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTI.Check OIS's competition here
TTI vs CCLP Comparison July 2025
TTI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTI stands at 501.7M. In comparison, CCLP has a market cap of 344.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TTI is priced at $3.77, while CCLP trades at $2.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTI currently has a P/E ratio of 4.28, whereas CCLP's P/E ratio is -34.57. In terms of profitability, TTI's ROE is +0.53%, compared to CCLP's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, TTI is less volatile compared to CCLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTI.Check CCLP's competition here
TTI vs NGS Comparison July 2025
TTI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTI stands at 501.7M. In comparison, NGS has a market cap of 306.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TTI is priced at $3.77, while NGS trades at $24.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTI currently has a P/E ratio of 4.28, whereas NGS's P/E ratio is 18.25. In terms of profitability, TTI's ROE is +0.53%, compared to NGS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TTI is more volatile compared to NGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTI.Check NGS's competition here
TTI vs RNGR Comparison July 2025
TTI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTI stands at 501.7M. In comparison, RNGR has a market cap of 292.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TTI is priced at $3.77, while RNGR trades at $12.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTI currently has a P/E ratio of 4.28, whereas RNGR's P/E ratio is 14.76. In terms of profitability, TTI's ROE is +0.53%, compared to RNGR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TTI is less volatile compared to RNGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTI.Check RNGR's competition here
TTI vs FET Comparison July 2025
TTI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTI stands at 501.7M. In comparison, FET has a market cap of 254.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TTI is priced at $3.77, while FET trades at $20.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTI currently has a P/E ratio of 4.28, whereas FET's P/E ratio is -2.04. In terms of profitability, TTI's ROE is +0.53%, compared to FET's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, TTI is more volatile compared to FET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTI.Check FET's competition here
TTI vs GEOS Comparison July 2025
TTI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTI stands at 501.7M. In comparison, GEOS has a market cap of 202.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TTI is priced at $3.77, while GEOS trades at $15.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTI currently has a P/E ratio of 4.28, whereas GEOS's P/E ratio is -12.73. In terms of profitability, TTI's ROE is +0.53%, compared to GEOS's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TTI is less volatile compared to GEOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTI.Check GEOS's competition here
TTI vs BOOM Comparison July 2025
TTI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTI stands at 501.7M. In comparison, BOOM has a market cap of 181.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TTI is priced at $3.77, while BOOM trades at $8.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTI currently has a P/E ratio of 4.28, whereas BOOM's P/E ratio is -1.08. In terms of profitability, TTI's ROE is +0.53%, compared to BOOM's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, TTI is less volatile compared to BOOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTI.Check BOOM's competition here
TTI vs PFIE Comparison July 2025
TTI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTI stands at 501.7M. In comparison, PFIE has a market cap of 117.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TTI is priced at $3.77, while PFIE trades at $2.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTI currently has a P/E ratio of 4.28, whereas PFIE's P/E ratio is 13.37. In terms of profitability, TTI's ROE is +0.53%, compared to PFIE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TTI is more volatile compared to PFIE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTI.Check PFIE's competition here
TTI vs LSE Comparison July 2025
TTI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTI stands at 501.7M. In comparison, LSE has a market cap of 94.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TTI is priced at $3.77, while LSE trades at $5.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTI currently has a P/E ratio of 4.28, whereas LSE's P/E ratio is 11.56. In terms of profitability, TTI's ROE is +0.53%, compared to LSE's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TTI is more volatile compared to LSE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTI.Check LSE's competition here
TTI vs RCON Comparison July 2025
TTI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTI stands at 501.7M. In comparison, RCON has a market cap of 90.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TTI is priced at $3.77, while RCON trades at $2.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTI currently has a P/E ratio of 4.28, whereas RCON's P/E ratio is -2.16. In terms of profitability, TTI's ROE is +0.53%, compared to RCON's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TTI is less volatile compared to RCON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTI.Check RCON's competition here
TTI vs SND Comparison July 2025
TTI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTI stands at 501.7M. In comparison, SND has a market cap of 88.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TTI is priced at $3.77, while SND trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTI currently has a P/E ratio of 4.28, whereas SND's P/E ratio is -3.77. In terms of profitability, TTI's ROE is +0.53%, compared to SND's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TTI is more volatile compared to SND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTI.Check SND's competition here
TTI vs DTI Comparison July 2025
TTI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTI stands at 501.7M. In comparison, DTI has a market cap of 80.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TTI is priced at $3.77, while DTI trades at $2.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTI currently has a P/E ratio of 4.28, whereas DTI's P/E ratio is -32.14. In terms of profitability, TTI's ROE is +0.53%, compared to DTI's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TTI is more volatile compared to DTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTI.Check DTI's competition here
TTI vs NCSM Comparison July 2025
TTI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTI stands at 501.7M. In comparison, NCSM has a market cap of 77.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TTI is priced at $3.77, while NCSM trades at $30.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTI currently has a P/E ratio of 4.28, whereas NCSM's P/E ratio is 9.37. In terms of profitability, TTI's ROE is +0.53%, compared to NCSM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TTI is less volatile compared to NCSM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTI.Check NCSM's competition here
TTI vs DWSN Comparison July 2025
TTI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTI stands at 501.7M. In comparison, DWSN has a market cap of 46.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TTI is priced at $3.77, while DWSN trades at $1.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTI currently has a P/E ratio of 4.28, whereas DWSN's P/E ratio is -5.14. In terms of profitability, TTI's ROE is +0.53%, compared to DWSN's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, TTI is less volatile compared to DWSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTI.Check DWSN's competition here
TTI vs KLXE Comparison July 2025
TTI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTI stands at 501.7M. In comparison, KLXE has a market cap of 34.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TTI is priced at $3.77, while KLXE trades at $1.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTI currently has a P/E ratio of 4.28, whereas KLXE's P/E ratio is -0.56. In terms of profitability, TTI's ROE is +0.53%, compared to KLXE's ROE of +9.47%. Regarding short-term risk, TTI is less volatile compared to KLXE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTI.Check KLXE's competition here
TTI vs NINE Comparison July 2025
TTI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTI stands at 501.7M. In comparison, NINE has a market cap of 33.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TTI is priced at $3.77, while NINE trades at $0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTI currently has a P/E ratio of 4.28, whereas NINE's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, TTI's ROE is +0.53%, compared to NINE's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, TTI is less volatile compared to NINE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTI.Check NINE's competition here
TTI vs SDPI Comparison July 2025
TTI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTI stands at 501.7M. In comparison, SDPI has a market cap of 30.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TTI is priced at $3.77, while SDPI trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTI currently has a P/E ratio of 4.28, whereas SDPI's P/E ratio is 7.21. In terms of profitability, TTI's ROE is +0.53%, compared to SDPI's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TTI is more volatile compared to SDPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTI.Check SDPI's competition here
TTI vs ENSV Comparison July 2025
TTI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTI stands at 501.7M. In comparison, ENSV has a market cap of 369.5K. Regarding current trading prices, TTI is priced at $3.77, while ENSV trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTI currently has a P/E ratio of 4.28, whereas ENSV's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, TTI's ROE is +0.53%, compared to ENSV's ROE of -4.70%. Regarding short-term risk, TTI is more volatile compared to ENSV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTI.Check ENSV's competition here
TTI vs CELP Comparison July 2025
TTI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTI stands at 501.7M. In comparison, CELP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TTI is priced at $3.77, while CELP trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTI currently has a P/E ratio of 4.28, whereas CELP's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, TTI's ROE is +0.53%, compared to CELP's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TTI is less volatile compared to CELP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTI.Check CELP's competition here
TTI vs EXTN Comparison July 2025
TTI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTI stands at 501.7M. In comparison, EXTN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TTI is priced at $3.77, while EXTN trades at $4.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTI currently has a P/E ratio of 4.28, whereas EXTN's P/E ratio is -1.35. In terms of profitability, TTI's ROE is +0.53%, compared to EXTN's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, TTI is less volatile compared to EXTN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTI.Check EXTN's competition here
TTI vs FTSI Comparison July 2025
TTI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTI stands at 501.7M. In comparison, FTSI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TTI is priced at $3.77, while FTSI trades at $26.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTI currently has a P/E ratio of 4.28, whereas FTSI's P/E ratio is 4.67. In terms of profitability, TTI's ROE is +0.53%, compared to FTSI's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TTI is less volatile compared to FTSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTI.Check FTSI's competition here
TTI vs USWS Comparison July 2025
TTI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTI stands at 501.7M. In comparison, USWS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TTI is priced at $3.77, while USWS trades at $7.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTI currently has a P/E ratio of 4.28, whereas USWS's P/E ratio is -3.94. In terms of profitability, TTI's ROE is +0.53%, compared to USWS's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TTI is less volatile compared to USWS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTI.Check USWS's competition here
TTI vs ACDCW Comparison July 2025
TTI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTI stands at 501.7M. In comparison, ACDCW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TTI is priced at $3.77, while ACDCW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTI currently has a P/E ratio of 4.28, whereas ACDCW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TTI's ROE is +0.53%, compared to ACDCW's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TTI is less volatile compared to ACDCW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTI.Check ACDCW's competition here
TTI vs IO Comparison July 2025
TTI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTI stands at 501.7M. In comparison, IO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TTI is priced at $3.77, while IO trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTI currently has a P/E ratio of 4.28, whereas IO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TTI's ROE is +0.53%, compared to IO's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, TTI is less volatile compared to IO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTI.Check IO's competition here