TETRA Technologies, Inc.
TETRA Technologies, Inc. TTI Peers
See (TTI) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Equipment & Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TTI | $3.01 | -0.17% | 399.88M | 3.41 | $0.88 | N/A |
| SLB | $34.15 | +1.16% | 46.44B | 10.98 | $3.11 | +3.07% |
| BKR | $37.84 | -0.89% | 37.49B | 12.91 | $2.93 | +2.32% |
| TS | $34.71 | -0.23% | 18.60B | 10.58 | $3.28 | +3.86% |
| HAL | $21.23 | -0.38% | 18.25B | 8.88 | $2.39 | +3.19% |
| FTI | $31.47 | +0.61% | 13.19B | 16.65 | $1.89 | +0.64% |
| LB | $78.43 | -0.66% | 6.00B | -27.04 | -$2.90 | +0.25% |
| CHX | $26.19 | -0.27% | 5.01B | 17.34 | $1.51 | +1.45% |
| NOV | $13.09 | +0.15% | 4.92B | 8.79 | $1.49 | +2.30% |
| AROC | $25.79 | +1.30% | 4.56B | 21.67 | $1.19 | +2.80% |
Stock Comparison
TTI vs SLB Comparison
TTI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTI stands at 399.88M. In comparison, SLB has a market cap of 46.44B. Regarding current trading prices, TTI is priced at $3.01, while SLB trades at $34.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.41, whereas SLB's P/E ratio is 10.98. In terms of profitability, TTI's ROE is +0.53%, compared to SLB's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TTI is less volatile compared to SLB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTI.
TTI vs BKR Comparison
TTI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTI stands at 399.88M. In comparison, BKR has a market cap of 37.49B. Regarding current trading prices, TTI is priced at $3.01, while BKR trades at $37.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.41, whereas BKR's P/E ratio is 12.91. In terms of profitability, TTI's ROE is +0.53%, compared to BKR's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TTI is more volatile compared to BKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTI.
TTI vs TS Comparison
TTI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTI stands at 399.88M. In comparison, TS has a market cap of 18.60B. Regarding current trading prices, TTI is priced at $3.01, while TS trades at $34.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.41, whereas TS's P/E ratio is 10.58. In terms of profitability, TTI's ROE is +0.53%, compared to TS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TTI is more volatile compared to TS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTI.
TTI vs HAL Comparison
TTI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTI stands at 399.88M. In comparison, HAL has a market cap of 18.25B. Regarding current trading prices, TTI is priced at $3.01, while HAL trades at $21.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.41, whereas HAL's P/E ratio is 8.88. In terms of profitability, TTI's ROE is +0.53%, compared to HAL's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TTI is more volatile compared to HAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTI.
TTI vs FTI Comparison
TTI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTI stands at 399.88M. In comparison, FTI has a market cap of 13.19B. Regarding current trading prices, TTI is priced at $3.01, while FTI trades at $31.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.41, whereas FTI's P/E ratio is 16.65. In terms of profitability, TTI's ROE is +0.53%, compared to FTI's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TTI is less volatile compared to FTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTI.
TTI vs LB Comparison
TTI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTI stands at 399.88M. In comparison, LB has a market cap of 6.00B. Regarding current trading prices, TTI is priced at $3.01, while LB trades at $78.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.41, whereas LB's P/E ratio is -27.04. In terms of profitability, TTI's ROE is +0.53%, compared to LB's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TTI is less volatile compared to LB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTI.
TTI vs CHX Comparison
TTI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTI stands at 399.88M. In comparison, CHX has a market cap of 5.01B. Regarding current trading prices, TTI is priced at $3.01, while CHX trades at $26.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.41, whereas CHX's P/E ratio is 17.34. In terms of profitability, TTI's ROE is +0.53%, compared to CHX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TTI is more volatile compared to CHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTI.
TTI vs NOV Comparison
TTI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTI stands at 399.88M. In comparison, NOV has a market cap of 4.92B. Regarding current trading prices, TTI is priced at $3.01, while NOV trades at $13.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.41, whereas NOV's P/E ratio is 8.79. In terms of profitability, TTI's ROE is +0.53%, compared to NOV's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TTI is more volatile compared to NOV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTI.
TTI vs AROC Comparison
TTI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTI stands at 399.88M. In comparison, AROC has a market cap of 4.56B. Regarding current trading prices, TTI is priced at $3.01, while AROC trades at $25.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.41, whereas AROC's P/E ratio is 21.67. In terms of profitability, TTI's ROE is +0.53%, compared to AROC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TTI is more volatile compared to AROC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTI.
TTI vs WFRD Comparison
TTI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTI stands at 399.88M. In comparison, WFRD has a market cap of 3.63B. Regarding current trading prices, TTI is priced at $3.01, while WFRD trades at $49.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.41, whereas WFRD's P/E ratio is 7.96. In terms of profitability, TTI's ROE is +0.53%, compared to WFRD's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, TTI is more volatile compared to WFRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTI.
TTI vs KGS Comparison
TTI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTI stands at 399.88M. In comparison, KGS has a market cap of 3.18B. Regarding current trading prices, TTI is priced at $3.01, while KGS trades at $36.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.41, whereas KGS's P/E ratio is 72.35. In terms of profitability, TTI's ROE is +0.53%, compared to KGS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TTI is more volatile compared to KGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTI.
TTI vs WHD Comparison
TTI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTI stands at 399.88M. In comparison, WHD has a market cap of 3.03B. Regarding current trading prices, TTI is priced at $3.01, while WHD trades at $44.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.41, whereas WHD's P/E ratio is 15.77. In terms of profitability, TTI's ROE is +0.53%, compared to WHD's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TTI is more volatile compared to WHD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTI.
TTI vs VAL-WT Comparison
TTI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTI stands at 399.88M. In comparison, VAL-WT has a market cap of 2.90B. Regarding current trading prices, TTI is priced at $3.01, while VAL-WT trades at $4.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.41, whereas VAL-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TTI's ROE is +0.53%, compared to VAL-WT's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TTI is less volatile compared to VAL-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTI.
TTI vs USAC Comparison
TTI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTI stands at 399.88M. In comparison, USAC has a market cap of 2.87B. Regarding current trading prices, TTI is priced at $3.01, while USAC trades at $24.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.41, whereas USAC's P/E ratio is 36.43. In terms of profitability, TTI's ROE is +0.53%, compared to USAC's ROE of +1.96%. Regarding short-term risk, TTI is more volatile compared to USAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTI.
TTI vs VAL Comparison
TTI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTI stands at 399.88M. In comparison, VAL has a market cap of 2.81B. Regarding current trading prices, TTI is priced at $3.01, while VAL trades at $39.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.41, whereas VAL's P/E ratio is 9.33. In terms of profitability, TTI's ROE is +0.53%, compared to VAL's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TTI is less volatile compared to VAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTI.
TTI vs TDW-WT Comparison
TTI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTI stands at 399.88M. In comparison, TDW-WT has a market cap of 2.65B. Regarding current trading prices, TTI is priced at $3.01, while TDW-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.41, whereas TDW-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TTI's ROE is +0.53%, compared to TDW-WT's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TTI is more volatile compared to TDW-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTI.
TTI vs NEX Comparison
TTI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTI stands at 399.88M. In comparison, NEX has a market cap of 2.42B. Regarding current trading prices, TTI is priced at $3.01, while NEX trades at $10.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.41, whereas NEX's P/E ratio is 3.94. In terms of profitability, TTI's ROE is +0.53%, compared to NEX's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, TTI is less volatile compared to NEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTI.
TTI vs TDW Comparison
TTI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTI stands at 399.88M. In comparison, TDW has a market cap of 2.11B. Regarding current trading prices, TTI is priced at $3.01, while TDW trades at $42.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.41, whereas TDW's P/E ratio is 12.74. In terms of profitability, TTI's ROE is +0.53%, compared to TDW's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TTI is less volatile compared to TDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTI.
TTI vs OII Comparison
TTI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTI stands at 399.88M. In comparison, OII has a market cap of 2.02B. Regarding current trading prices, TTI is priced at $3.01, while OII trades at $20.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.41, whereas OII's P/E ratio is 11.30. In terms of profitability, TTI's ROE is +0.53%, compared to OII's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TTI is more volatile compared to OII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTI.
TTI vs LBRT Comparison
TTI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTI stands at 399.88M. In comparison, LBRT has a market cap of 2.02B. Regarding current trading prices, TTI is priced at $3.01, while LBRT trades at $12.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.41, whereas LBRT's P/E ratio is 8.27. In terms of profitability, TTI's ROE is +0.53%, compared to LBRT's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TTI is more volatile compared to LBRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTI.
TTI vs DNOW Comparison
TTI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTI stands at 399.88M. In comparison, DNOW has a market cap of 1.65B. Regarding current trading prices, TTI is priced at $3.01, while DNOW trades at $15.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.41, whereas DNOW's P/E ratio is 20.78. In terms of profitability, TTI's ROE is +0.53%, compared to DNOW's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TTI is more volatile compared to DNOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTI.
TTI vs AESI Comparison
TTI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTI stands at 399.88M. In comparison, AESI has a market cap of 1.64B. Regarding current trading prices, TTI is priced at $3.01, while AESI trades at $13.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.41, whereas AESI's P/E ratio is 44.12. In terms of profitability, TTI's ROE is +0.53%, compared to AESI's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TTI is less volatile compared to AESI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTI.
TTI vs SEI Comparison
TTI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTI stands at 399.88M. In comparison, SEI has a market cap of 1.57B. Regarding current trading prices, TTI is priced at $3.01, while SEI trades at $23.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.41, whereas SEI's P/E ratio is 46.49. In terms of profitability, TTI's ROE is +0.53%, compared to SEI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TTI is less volatile compared to SEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTI.
TTI vs SLCA Comparison
TTI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTI stands at 399.88M. In comparison, SLCA has a market cap of 1.21B. Regarding current trading prices, TTI is priced at $3.01, while SLCA trades at $15.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.41, whereas SLCA's P/E ratio is 10.54. In terms of profitability, TTI's ROE is +0.53%, compared to SLCA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TTI is more volatile compared to SLCA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTI.
TTI vs PFHC Comparison
TTI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTI stands at 399.88M. In comparison, PFHC has a market cap of 1.21B. Regarding current trading prices, TTI is priced at $3.01, while PFHC trades at $22.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.41, whereas PFHC's P/E ratio is 105.14. In terms of profitability, TTI's ROE is +0.53%, compared to PFHC's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TTI is less volatile compared to PFHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTI.
TTI vs MRC Comparison
TTI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTI stands at 399.88M. In comparison, MRC has a market cap of 1.11B. Regarding current trading prices, TTI is priced at $3.01, while MRC trades at $12.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.41, whereas MRC's P/E ratio is 25.82. In terms of profitability, TTI's ROE is +0.53%, compared to MRC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TTI is more volatile compared to MRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTI.
TTI vs RES Comparison
TTI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTI stands at 399.88M. In comparison, RES has a market cap of 1.09B. Regarding current trading prices, TTI is priced at $3.01, while RES trades at $4.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.41, whereas RES's P/E ratio is 13.76. In terms of profitability, TTI's ROE is +0.53%, compared to RES's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TTI is less volatile compared to RES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTI.
TTI vs INVX Comparison
TTI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTI stands at 399.88M. In comparison, INVX has a market cap of 1.05B. Regarding current trading prices, TTI is priced at $3.01, while INVX trades at $15.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.41, whereas INVX's P/E ratio is 7.59. In terms of profitability, TTI's ROE is +0.53%, compared to INVX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TTI is more volatile compared to INVX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTI.
TTI vs HLX Comparison
TTI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTI stands at 399.88M. In comparison, HLX has a market cap of 1.02B. Regarding current trading prices, TTI is priced at $3.01, while HLX trades at $6.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.41, whereas HLX's P/E ratio is 12.20. In terms of profitability, TTI's ROE is +0.53%, compared to HLX's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TTI is less volatile compared to HLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTI.
TTI vs XPRO Comparison
TTI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTI stands at 399.88M. In comparison, XPRO has a market cap of 985.44M. Regarding current trading prices, TTI is priced at $3.01, while XPRO trades at $8.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.41, whereas XPRO's P/E ratio is 14.47. In terms of profitability, TTI's ROE is +0.53%, compared to XPRO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TTI is less volatile compared to XPRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTI.
TTI vs ACDC Comparison
TTI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTI stands at 399.88M. In comparison, ACDC has a market cap of 983.50M. Regarding current trading prices, TTI is priced at $3.01, while ACDC trades at $6.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.41, whereas ACDC's P/E ratio is -4.09. In terms of profitability, TTI's ROE is +0.53%, compared to ACDC's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TTI is less volatile compared to ACDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTI.
TTI vs WTTR Comparison
TTI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTI stands at 399.88M. In comparison, WTTR has a market cap of 898.51M. Regarding current trading prices, TTI is priced at $3.01, while WTTR trades at $8.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.41, whereas WTTR's P/E ratio is 25.41. In terms of profitability, TTI's ROE is +0.53%, compared to WTTR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TTI is more volatile compared to WTTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTI.
TTI vs EFXT Comparison
TTI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTI stands at 399.88M. In comparison, EFXT has a market cap of 891.35M. Regarding current trading prices, TTI is priced at $3.01, while EFXT trades at $7.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.41, whereas EFXT's P/E ratio is 11.97. In terms of profitability, TTI's ROE is +0.53%, compared to EFXT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TTI is less volatile compared to EFXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTI.
TTI vs VTOL Comparison
TTI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTI stands at 399.88M. In comparison, VTOL has a market cap of 863.83M. Regarding current trading prices, TTI is priced at $3.01, while VTOL trades at $30.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.41, whereas VTOL's P/E ratio is 7.70. In terms of profitability, TTI's ROE is +0.53%, compared to VTOL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TTI is more volatile compared to VTOL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTI.
TTI vs NPKI Comparison
TTI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTI stands at 399.88M. In comparison, NPKI has a market cap of 714.22M. Regarding current trading prices, TTI is priced at $3.01, while NPKI trades at $8.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.41, whereas NPKI's P/E ratio is 17.60. In terms of profitability, TTI's ROE is +0.53%, compared to NPKI's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, TTI is more volatile compared to NPKI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTI.
TTI vs PUMP Comparison
TTI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTI stands at 399.88M. In comparison, PUMP has a market cap of 629.18M. Regarding current trading prices, TTI is priced at $3.01, while PUMP trades at $6.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.41, whereas PUMP's P/E ratio is -4.26. In terms of profitability, TTI's ROE is +0.53%, compared to PUMP's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TTI is less volatile compared to PUMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTI.
TTI vs NR Comparison
TTI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTI stands at 399.88M. In comparison, NR has a market cap of 627.11M. Regarding current trading prices, TTI is priced at $3.01, while NR trades at $7.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.41, whereas NR's P/E ratio is 19.08. In terms of profitability, TTI's ROE is +0.53%, compared to NR's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, TTI is less volatile compared to NR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTI.
TTI vs NESR Comparison
TTI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTI stands at 399.88M. In comparison, NESR has a market cap of 626.22M. Regarding current trading prices, TTI is priced at $3.01, while NESR trades at $6.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.41, whereas NESR's P/E ratio is 8.15. In terms of profitability, TTI's ROE is +0.53%, compared to NESR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TTI is less volatile compared to NESR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTI.
TTI vs CLB Comparison
TTI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTI stands at 399.88M. In comparison, CLB has a market cap of 571.97M. Regarding current trading prices, TTI is priced at $3.01, while CLB trades at $12.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.41, whereas CLB's P/E ratio is 20.68. In terms of profitability, TTI's ROE is +0.53%, compared to CLB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TTI is less volatile compared to CLB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTI.
TTI vs DRQ Comparison
TTI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTI stands at 399.88M. In comparison, DRQ has a market cap of 530.91M. Regarding current trading prices, TTI is priced at $3.01, while DRQ trades at $15.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.41, whereas DRQ's P/E ratio is -19.76. In terms of profitability, TTI's ROE is +0.53%, compared to DRQ's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TTI is less volatile compared to DRQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTI.
TTI vs FLOC Comparison
TTI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTI stands at 399.88M. In comparison, FLOC has a market cap of 525.49M. Regarding current trading prices, TTI is priced at $3.01, while FLOC trades at $20.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.41, whereas FLOC's P/E ratio is 22.45. In terms of profitability, TTI's ROE is +0.53%, compared to FLOC's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, TTI is less volatile compared to FLOC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTI.
TTI vs NESRW Comparison
TTI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTI stands at 399.88M. In comparison, NESRW has a market cap of 524.53M. Regarding current trading prices, TTI is priced at $3.01, while NESRW trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.41, whereas NESRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TTI's ROE is +0.53%, compared to NESRW's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TTI is less volatile compared to NESRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTI.
TTI vs NOA Comparison
TTI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTI stands at 399.88M. In comparison, NOA has a market cap of 501.00M. Regarding current trading prices, TTI is priced at $3.01, while NOA trades at $16.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.41, whereas NOA's P/E ratio is 15.48. In terms of profitability, TTI's ROE is +0.53%, compared to NOA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TTI is less volatile compared to NOA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTI.
TTI vs SOI Comparison
TTI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTI stands at 399.88M. In comparison, SOI has a market cap of 498.11M. Regarding current trading prices, TTI is priced at $3.01, while SOI trades at $11.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.41, whereas SOI's P/E ratio is 17.15. In terms of profitability, TTI's ROE is +0.53%, compared to SOI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TTI is less volatile compared to SOI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTI.
TTI vs FTK Comparison
TTI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTI stands at 399.88M. In comparison, FTK has a market cap of 437.11M. Regarding current trading prices, TTI is priced at $3.01, while FTK trades at $14.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.41, whereas FTK's P/E ratio is 31.86. In terms of profitability, TTI's ROE is +0.53%, compared to FTK's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TTI is less volatile compared to FTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTI.
TTI vs CCLP Comparison
TTI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTI stands at 399.88M. In comparison, CCLP has a market cap of 344.84M. Regarding current trading prices, TTI is priced at $3.01, while CCLP trades at $2.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.41, whereas CCLP's P/E ratio is -34.57. In terms of profitability, TTI's ROE is +0.53%, compared to CCLP's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, TTI is less volatile compared to CCLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTI.
TTI vs NGS Comparison
TTI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTI stands at 399.88M. In comparison, NGS has a market cap of 314.50M. Regarding current trading prices, TTI is priced at $3.01, while NGS trades at $25.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.41, whereas NGS's P/E ratio is 18.32. In terms of profitability, TTI's ROE is +0.53%, compared to NGS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TTI is less volatile compared to NGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTI.
TTI vs OIS Comparison
TTI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTI stands at 399.88M. In comparison, OIS has a market cap of 295.73M. Regarding current trading prices, TTI is priced at $3.01, while OIS trades at $4.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.41, whereas OIS's P/E ratio is 59.75. In terms of profitability, TTI's ROE is +0.53%, compared to OIS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TTI is less volatile compared to OIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTI.
TTI vs RNGR Comparison
TTI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTI stands at 399.88M. In comparison, RNGR has a market cap of 272.00M. Regarding current trading prices, TTI is priced at $3.01, while RNGR trades at $12.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.41, whereas RNGR's P/E ratio is 13.58. In terms of profitability, TTI's ROE is +0.53%, compared to RNGR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TTI is more volatile compared to RNGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTI.
TTI vs FET Comparison
TTI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTI stands at 399.88M. In comparison, FET has a market cap of 202.24M. Regarding current trading prices, TTI is priced at $3.01, while FET trades at $16.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.41, whereas FET's P/E ratio is -1.63. In terms of profitability, TTI's ROE is +0.53%, compared to FET's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, TTI is less volatile compared to FET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTI.
TTI vs BOOM Comparison
TTI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTI stands at 399.88M. In comparison, BOOM has a market cap of 144.25M. Regarding current trading prices, TTI is priced at $3.01, while BOOM trades at $7.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.41, whereas BOOM's P/E ratio is -0.86. In terms of profitability, TTI's ROE is +0.53%, compared to BOOM's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, TTI is less volatile compared to BOOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTI.
TTI vs PFIE Comparison
TTI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTI stands at 399.88M. In comparison, PFIE has a market cap of 117.35M. Regarding current trading prices, TTI is priced at $3.01, while PFIE trades at $2.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.41, whereas PFIE's P/E ratio is 13.37. In terms of profitability, TTI's ROE is +0.53%, compared to PFIE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TTI is more volatile compared to PFIE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTI.
TTI vs LSE Comparison
TTI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTI stands at 399.88M. In comparison, LSE has a market cap of 89.38M. Regarding current trading prices, TTI is priced at $3.01, while LSE trades at $5.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.41, whereas LSE's P/E ratio is 10.94. In terms of profitability, TTI's ROE is +0.53%, compared to LSE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TTI is less volatile compared to LSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTI.
TTI vs DTI Comparison
TTI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTI stands at 399.88M. In comparison, DTI has a market cap of 88.98M. Regarding current trading prices, TTI is priced at $3.01, while DTI trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.41, whereas DTI's P/E ratio is 27.78. In terms of profitability, TTI's ROE is +0.53%, compared to DTI's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TTI is less volatile compared to DTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTI.
TTI vs SND Comparison
TTI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTI stands at 399.88M. In comparison, SND has a market cap of 87.73M. Regarding current trading prices, TTI is priced at $3.01, while SND trades at $1.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.41, whereas SND's P/E ratio is 24.88. In terms of profitability, TTI's ROE is +0.53%, compared to SND's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TTI is less volatile compared to SND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTI.
TTI vs NCSM Comparison
TTI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTI stands at 399.88M. In comparison, NCSM has a market cap of 78.92M. Regarding current trading prices, TTI is priced at $3.01, while NCSM trades at $31.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.41, whereas NCSM's P/E ratio is 9.59. In terms of profitability, TTI's ROE is +0.53%, compared to NCSM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TTI is less volatile compared to NCSM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTI.
TTI vs GEOS Comparison
TTI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTI stands at 399.88M. In comparison, GEOS has a market cap of 78.63M. Regarding current trading prices, TTI is priced at $3.01, while GEOS trades at $6.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.41, whereas GEOS's P/E ratio is -4.95. In terms of profitability, TTI's ROE is +0.53%, compared to GEOS's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TTI is less volatile compared to GEOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTI.
TTI vs RCON Comparison
TTI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTI stands at 399.88M. In comparison, RCON has a market cap of 49.86M. Regarding current trading prices, TTI is priced at $3.01, while RCON trades at $1.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.41, whereas RCON's P/E ratio is -1.32. In terms of profitability, TTI's ROE is +0.53%, compared to RCON's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TTI is more volatile compared to RCON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTI.
TTI vs KLXE Comparison
TTI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTI stands at 399.88M. In comparison, KLXE has a market cap of 39.06M. Regarding current trading prices, TTI is priced at $3.01, while KLXE trades at $2.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.41, whereas KLXE's P/E ratio is -0.63. In terms of profitability, TTI's ROE is +0.53%, compared to KLXE's ROE of +9.47%. Regarding short-term risk, TTI is less volatile compared to KLXE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTI.
TTI vs DWSN Comparison
TTI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTI stands at 399.88M. In comparison, DWSN has a market cap of 38.73M. Regarding current trading prices, TTI is priced at $3.01, while DWSN trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.41, whereas DWSN's P/E ratio is -9.62. In terms of profitability, TTI's ROE is +0.53%, compared to DWSN's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TTI is less volatile compared to DWSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTI.
TTI vs SDPI Comparison
TTI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTI stands at 399.88M. In comparison, SDPI has a market cap of 30.70M. Regarding current trading prices, TTI is priced at $3.01, while SDPI trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.41, whereas SDPI's P/E ratio is 7.21. In terms of profitability, TTI's ROE is +0.53%, compared to SDPI's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, TTI is more volatile compared to SDPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTI.
TTI vs NINE Comparison
TTI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTI stands at 399.88M. In comparison, NINE has a market cap of 29.35M. Regarding current trading prices, TTI is priced at $3.01, while NINE trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.41, whereas NINE's P/E ratio is -0.66. In terms of profitability, TTI's ROE is +0.53%, compared to NINE's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, TTI is less volatile compared to NINE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTI.
TTI vs ENSV Comparison
TTI plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTI stands at 399.88M. In comparison, ENSV has a market cap of 901833.00. Regarding current trading prices, TTI is priced at $3.01, while ENSV trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.41, whereas ENSV's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, TTI's ROE is +0.53%, compared to ENSV's ROE of -4.70%. Regarding short-term risk, TTI is less volatile compared to ENSV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTI.