Grupo Supervielle S.A.
Grupo Supervielle S.A. (SUPV) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SUPV) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Banks - Regional Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SUPV | $8.92 | +1.02% | 780.9M | -28.77 | -$0.31 | +2.27% |
| USB-PA | $782.88 | -0.64% | 1.3T | 221.54 | $3.51 | +3.66% |
| HDB | $25.35 | -1.40% | 130B | 17.60 | $1.44 | +4.41% |
| MFG | $8.45 | +2.18% | 104.4B | 15.94 | $0.53 | +2.32% |
| ITUB | $8.85 | +0.57% | 97.5B | 11.06 | $0.80 | +7.05% |
| IBN | $26.91 | -2.29% | 96.3B | 16.81 | $1.60 | +0.92% |
| PNC | $220.89 | -0.20% | 89.1B | 12.83 | $17.22 | +3.08% |
| USB | $56.21 | +0.43% | 87.4B | 11.79 | $4.77 | +3.66% |
| LYG | $5.33 | +0.00% | 78.3B | 14.41 | $0.37 | +3.70% |
| USB-PP | $22.09 | -0.05% | 69.2B | 4.76 | $4.64 | +3.66% |
Stock Comparison
SUPV vs USB-PA Comparison April 2026
SUPV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPV stands at 780.9M. In comparison, USB-PA has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, SUPV is priced at $8.92, while USB-PA trades at $782.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPV currently has a P/E ratio of -28.77, whereas USB-PA's P/E ratio is 221.54. In terms of profitability, SUPV's ROE is -0.05%, compared to USB-PA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPV is more volatile compared to USB-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPV.Check USB-PA's competition here
SUPV vs HDB Comparison April 2026
SUPV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPV stands at 780.9M. In comparison, HDB has a market cap of 130B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPV is priced at $8.92, while HDB trades at $25.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPV currently has a P/E ratio of -28.77, whereas HDB's P/E ratio is 17.60. In terms of profitability, SUPV's ROE is -0.05%, compared to HDB's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPV is more volatile compared to HDB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPV.Check HDB's competition here
SUPV vs MFG Comparison April 2026
SUPV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPV stands at 780.9M. In comparison, MFG has a market cap of 104.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPV is priced at $8.92, while MFG trades at $8.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPV currently has a P/E ratio of -28.77, whereas MFG's P/E ratio is 15.94. In terms of profitability, SUPV's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MFG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPV is more volatile compared to MFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPV.Check MFG's competition here
SUPV vs ITUB Comparison April 2026
SUPV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPV stands at 780.9M. In comparison, ITUB has a market cap of 97.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPV is priced at $8.92, while ITUB trades at $8.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPV currently has a P/E ratio of -28.77, whereas ITUB's P/E ratio is 11.06. In terms of profitability, SUPV's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ITUB's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPV is more volatile compared to ITUB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPV.Check ITUB's competition here
SUPV vs IBN Comparison April 2026
SUPV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPV stands at 780.9M. In comparison, IBN has a market cap of 96.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPV is priced at $8.92, while IBN trades at $26.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPV currently has a P/E ratio of -28.77, whereas IBN's P/E ratio is 16.81. In terms of profitability, SUPV's ROE is -0.05%, compared to IBN's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPV is more volatile compared to IBN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPV.Check IBN's competition here
SUPV vs PNC Comparison April 2026
SUPV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPV stands at 780.9M. In comparison, PNC has a market cap of 89.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPV is priced at $8.92, while PNC trades at $220.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPV currently has a P/E ratio of -28.77, whereas PNC's P/E ratio is 12.83. In terms of profitability, SUPV's ROE is -0.05%, compared to PNC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPV is more volatile compared to PNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPV.Check PNC's competition here
SUPV vs USB Comparison April 2026
SUPV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPV stands at 780.9M. In comparison, USB has a market cap of 87.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPV is priced at $8.92, while USB trades at $56.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPV currently has a P/E ratio of -28.77, whereas USB's P/E ratio is 11.79. In terms of profitability, SUPV's ROE is -0.05%, compared to USB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPV is more volatile compared to USB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPV.Check USB's competition here
SUPV vs LYG Comparison April 2026
SUPV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPV stands at 780.9M. In comparison, LYG has a market cap of 78.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPV is priced at $8.92, while LYG trades at $5.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPV currently has a P/E ratio of -28.77, whereas LYG's P/E ratio is 14.41. In terms of profitability, SUPV's ROE is -0.05%, compared to LYG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPV is more volatile compared to LYG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPV.Check LYG's competition here
SUPV vs USB-PP Comparison April 2026
SUPV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPV stands at 780.9M. In comparison, USB-PP has a market cap of 69.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPV is priced at $8.92, while USB-PP trades at $22.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPV currently has a P/E ratio of -28.77, whereas USB-PP's P/E ratio is 4.76. In terms of profitability, SUPV's ROE is -0.05%, compared to USB-PP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPV is more volatile compared to USB-PP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPV.Check USB-PP's competition here
SUPV vs USB-PS Comparison April 2026
SUPV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPV stands at 780.9M. In comparison, USB-PS has a market cap of 68.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPV is priced at $8.92, while USB-PS trades at $17.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPV currently has a P/E ratio of -28.77, whereas USB-PS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUPV's ROE is -0.05%, compared to USB-PS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPV is more volatile compared to USB-PS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPV.Check USB-PS's competition here
SUPV vs USB-PH Comparison April 2026
SUPV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPV stands at 780.9M. In comparison, USB-PH has a market cap of 67.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPV is priced at $8.92, while USB-PH trades at $18.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPV currently has a P/E ratio of -28.77, whereas USB-PH's P/E ratio is 4.05. In terms of profitability, SUPV's ROE is -0.05%, compared to USB-PH's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPV is more volatile compared to USB-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPV.Check USB-PH's competition here
SUPV vs TFC Comparison April 2026
SUPV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPV stands at 780.9M. In comparison, TFC has a market cap of 63.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPV is priced at $8.92, while TFC trades at $51.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPV currently has a P/E ratio of -28.77, whereas TFC's P/E ratio is 12.66. In terms of profitability, SUPV's ROE is -0.05%, compared to TFC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPV is more volatile compared to TFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPV.Check TFC's competition here
SUPV vs DB Comparison April 2026
SUPV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPV stands at 780.9M. In comparison, DB has a market cap of 60.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPV is priced at $8.92, while DB trades at $31.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPV currently has a P/E ratio of -28.77, whereas DB's P/E ratio is 8.83. In terms of profitability, SUPV's ROE is -0.05%, compared to DB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPV is more volatile compared to DB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPV.Check DB's competition here
SUPV vs BSBR Comparison April 2026
SUPV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPV stands at 780.9M. In comparison, BSBR has a market cap of 44.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPV is priced at $8.92, while BSBR trades at $5.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPV currently has a P/E ratio of -28.77, whereas BSBR's P/E ratio is 17.88. In terms of profitability, SUPV's ROE is -0.05%, compared to BSBR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPV is more volatile compared to BSBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPV.Check BSBR's competition here
SUPV vs HBANZ Comparison April 2026
SUPV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPV stands at 780.9M. In comparison, HBANZ has a market cap of 42.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPV is priced at $8.92, while HBANZ trades at $21.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPV currently has a P/E ratio of -28.77, whereas HBANZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUPV's ROE is -0.05%, compared to HBANZ's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPV is more volatile compared to HBANZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPV.Check HBANZ's competition here
SUPV vs BBD Comparison April 2026
SUPV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPV stands at 780.9M. In comparison, BBD has a market cap of 41B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPV is priced at $8.92, while BBD trades at $3.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPV currently has a P/E ratio of -28.77, whereas BBD's P/E ratio is 9.02. In terms of profitability, SUPV's ROE is -0.05%, compared to BBD's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPV is more volatile compared to BBD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPV.Check BBD's competition here
SUPV vs HBANL Comparison April 2026
SUPV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPV stands at 780.9M. In comparison, HBANL has a market cap of 40.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPV is priced at $8.92, while HBANL trades at $25.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPV currently has a P/E ratio of -28.77, whereas HBANL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUPV's ROE is -0.05%, compared to HBANL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPV is more volatile compared to HBANL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPV.Check HBANL's competition here
SUPV vs KB Comparison April 2026
SUPV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPV stands at 780.9M. In comparison, KB has a market cap of 38B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPV is priced at $8.92, while KB trades at $107.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPV currently has a P/E ratio of -28.77, whereas KB's P/E ratio is 10.40. In terms of profitability, SUPV's ROE is -0.05%, compared to KB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPV is more volatile compared to KB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPV.Check KB's competition here
SUPV vs BBDO Comparison April 2026
SUPV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPV stands at 780.9M. In comparison, BBDO has a market cap of 36.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPV is priced at $8.92, while BBDO trades at $3.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPV currently has a P/E ratio of -28.77, whereas BBDO's P/E ratio is 8.05. In terms of profitability, SUPV's ROE is -0.05%, compared to BBDO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPV is more volatile compared to BBDO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPV.Check BBDO's competition here
SUPV vs FITB Comparison April 2026
SUPV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPV stands at 780.9M. In comparison, FITB has a market cap of 35.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPV is priced at $8.92, while FITB trades at $50.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPV currently has a P/E ratio of -28.77, whereas FITB's P/E ratio is 16.94. In terms of profitability, SUPV's ROE is -0.05%, compared to FITB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPV is more volatile compared to FITB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPV.Check FITB's competition here
SUPV vs HBANM Comparison April 2026
SUPV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPV stands at 780.9M. In comparison, HBANM has a market cap of 35B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPV is priced at $8.92, while HBANM trades at $22.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPV currently has a P/E ratio of -28.77, whereas HBANM's P/E ratio is 28.42. In terms of profitability, SUPV's ROE is -0.05%, compared to HBANM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPV is more volatile compared to HBANM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPV.Check HBANM's competition here
SUPV vs SHG Comparison April 2026
SUPV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPV stands at 780.9M. In comparison, SHG has a market cap of 33.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPV is priced at $8.92, while SHG trades at $66.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPV currently has a P/E ratio of -28.77, whereas SHG's P/E ratio is 10.15. In terms of profitability, SUPV's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SHG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPV is more volatile compared to SHG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPV.Check SHG's competition here
SUPV vs MTB Comparison April 2026
SUPV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPV stands at 780.9M. In comparison, MTB has a market cap of 32.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPV is priced at $8.92, while MTB trades at $217.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPV currently has a P/E ratio of -28.77, whereas MTB's P/E ratio is 12.21. In terms of profitability, SUPV's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MTB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPV is more volatile compared to MTB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPV.Check MTB's competition here
SUPV vs CFG Comparison April 2026
SUPV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPV stands at 780.9M. In comparison, CFG has a market cap of 27.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPV is priced at $8.92, while CFG trades at $65.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPV currently has a P/E ratio of -28.77, whereas CFG's P/E ratio is 15.40. In terms of profitability, SUPV's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CFG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPV is more volatile compared to CFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPV.Check CFG's competition here
SUPV vs TFC-PO Comparison April 2026
SUPV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPV stands at 780.9M. In comparison, TFC-PO has a market cap of 27.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPV is priced at $8.92, while TFC-PO trades at $21.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPV currently has a P/E ratio of -28.77, whereas TFC-PO's P/E ratio is 4.81. In terms of profitability, SUPV's ROE is -0.05%, compared to TFC-PO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPV is more volatile compared to TFC-PO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPV.Check TFC-PO's competition here
SUPV vs KEY-PL Comparison April 2026
SUPV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPV stands at 780.9M. In comparison, KEY-PL has a market cap of 27.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPV is priced at $8.92, while KEY-PL trades at $24.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPV currently has a P/E ratio of -28.77, whereas KEY-PL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUPV's ROE is -0.05%, compared to KEY-PL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPV is more volatile compared to KEY-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPV.Check KEY-PL's competition here
SUPV vs HBANP Comparison April 2026
SUPV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPV stands at 780.9M. In comparison, HBANP has a market cap of 26.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPV is priced at $8.92, while HBANP trades at $17.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPV currently has a P/E ratio of -28.77, whereas HBANP's P/E ratio is 21.86. In terms of profitability, SUPV's ROE is -0.05%, compared to HBANP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPV is more volatile compared to HBANP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPV.Check HBANP's competition here
SUPV vs HBAN Comparison April 2026
SUPV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPV stands at 780.9M. In comparison, HBAN has a market cap of 26.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPV is priced at $8.92, while HBAN trades at $16.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPV currently has a P/E ratio of -28.77, whereas HBAN's P/E ratio is 12.73. In terms of profitability, SUPV's ROE is -0.05%, compared to HBAN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPV is more volatile compared to HBAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPV.Check HBAN's competition here
SUPV vs BAP Comparison April 2026
SUPV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPV stands at 780.9M. In comparison, BAP has a market cap of 25.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPV is priced at $8.92, while BAP trades at $320.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPV currently has a P/E ratio of -28.77, whereas BAP's P/E ratio is 12.92. In terms of profitability, SUPV's ROE is -0.05%, compared to BAP's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPV is more volatile compared to BAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPV.Check BAP's competition here
SUPV vs USB-PR Comparison April 2026
SUPV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPV stands at 780.9M. In comparison, USB-PR has a market cap of 24.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPV is priced at $8.92, while USB-PR trades at $15.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPV currently has a P/E ratio of -28.77, whereas USB-PR's P/E ratio is 3.44. In terms of profitability, SUPV's ROE is -0.05%, compared to USB-PR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPV is more volatile compared to USB-PR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPV.Check USB-PR's competition here
SUPV vs TFC-PI Comparison April 2026
SUPV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPV stands at 780.9M. In comparison, TFC-PI has a market cap of 24.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPV is priced at $8.92, while TFC-PI trades at $19.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPV currently has a P/E ratio of -28.77, whereas TFC-PI's P/E ratio is 4.29. In terms of profitability, SUPV's ROE is -0.05%, compared to TFC-PI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPV is more volatile compared to TFC-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPV.Check TFC-PI's competition here
SUPV vs RF Comparison April 2026
SUPV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPV stands at 780.9M. In comparison, RF has a market cap of 24.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPV is priced at $8.92, while RF trades at $28.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPV currently has a P/E ratio of -28.77, whereas RF's P/E ratio is 11.77. In terms of profitability, SUPV's ROE is -0.05%, compared to RF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPV is more volatile compared to RF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPV.Check RF's competition here
SUPV vs TFC-PR Comparison April 2026
SUPV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPV stands at 780.9M. In comparison, TFC-PR has a market cap of 23.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPV is priced at $8.92, while TFC-PR trades at $18.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPV currently has a P/E ratio of -28.77, whereas TFC-PR's P/E ratio is 4.19. In terms of profitability, SUPV's ROE is -0.05%, compared to TFC-PR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPV is more volatile compared to TFC-PR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPV.Check TFC-PR's competition here
SUPV vs KEY Comparison April 2026
SUPV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPV stands at 780.9M. In comparison, KEY has a market cap of 23.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPV is priced at $8.92, while KEY trades at $21.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPV currently has a P/E ratio of -28.77, whereas KEY's P/E ratio is 13.48. In terms of profitability, SUPV's ROE is -0.05%, compared to KEY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPV is more volatile compared to KEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPV.Check KEY's competition here
SUPV vs USB-PQ Comparison April 2026
SUPV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPV stands at 780.9M. In comparison, USB-PQ has a market cap of 23.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPV is priced at $8.92, while USB-PQ trades at $15.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPV currently has a P/E ratio of -28.77, whereas USB-PQ's P/E ratio is 3.25. In terms of profitability, SUPV's ROE is -0.05%, compared to USB-PQ's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPV is more volatile compared to USB-PQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPV.Check USB-PQ's competition here
SUPV vs FITBM Comparison April 2026
SUPV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPV stands at 780.9M. In comparison, FITBM has a market cap of 23.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPV is priced at $8.92, while FITBM trades at $25.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPV currently has a P/E ratio of -28.77, whereas FITBM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUPV's ROE is -0.05%, compared to FITBM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPV is more volatile compared to FITBM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPV.Check FITBM's competition here
SUPV vs FCNCA Comparison April 2026
SUPV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPV stands at 780.9M. In comparison, FCNCA has a market cap of 23B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPV is priced at $8.92, while FCNCA trades at $1,983.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPV currently has a P/E ratio of -28.77, whereas FCNCA's P/E ratio is 11.43. In terms of profitability, SUPV's ROE is -0.05%, compared to FCNCA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPV is more volatile compared to FCNCA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPV.Check FCNCA's competition here
SUPV vs FCNCN Comparison April 2026
SUPV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPV stands at 780.9M. In comparison, FCNCN has a market cap of 22.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPV is priced at $8.92, while FCNCN trades at $25.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPV currently has a P/E ratio of -28.77, whereas FCNCN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUPV's ROE is -0.05%, compared to FCNCN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPV is more volatile compared to FCNCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPV.Check FCNCN's competition here
SUPV vs RF-PF Comparison April 2026
SUPV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPV stands at 780.9M. In comparison, RF-PF has a market cap of 22.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPV is priced at $8.92, while RF-PF trades at $25.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPV currently has a P/E ratio of -28.77, whereas RF-PF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUPV's ROE is -0.05%, compared to RF-PF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPV is more volatile compared to RF-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPV.Check RF-PF's competition here
SUPV vs KEY-PJ Comparison April 2026
SUPV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPV stands at 780.9M. In comparison, KEY-PJ has a market cap of 22.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPV is priced at $8.92, while KEY-PJ trades at $21.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPV currently has a P/E ratio of -28.77, whereas KEY-PJ's P/E ratio is 8.73. In terms of profitability, SUPV's ROE is -0.05%, compared to KEY-PJ's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPV is more volatile compared to KEY-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPV.Check KEY-PJ's competition here
SUPV vs RF-PC Comparison April 2026
SUPV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPV stands at 780.9M. In comparison, RF-PC has a market cap of 21.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPV is priced at $8.92, while RF-PC trades at $24.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPV currently has a P/E ratio of -28.77, whereas RF-PC's P/E ratio is 10.30. In terms of profitability, SUPV's ROE is -0.05%, compared to RF-PC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPV is more volatile compared to RF-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPV.Check RF-PC's competition here
SUPV vs KEY-PI Comparison April 2026
SUPV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPV stands at 780.9M. In comparison, KEY-PI has a market cap of 20.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPV is priced at $8.92, while KEY-PI trades at $25.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPV currently has a P/E ratio of -28.77, whereas KEY-PI's P/E ratio is 10.11. In terms of profitability, SUPV's ROE is -0.05%, compared to KEY-PI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPV is more volatile compared to KEY-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPV.Check KEY-PI's competition here
SUPV vs BCH Comparison April 2026
SUPV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPV stands at 780.9M. In comparison, BCH has a market cap of 19.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPV is priced at $8.92, while BCH trades at $37.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPV currently has a P/E ratio of -28.77, whereas BCH's P/E ratio is 14.30. In terms of profitability, SUPV's ROE is -0.05%, compared to BCH's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPV is more volatile compared to BCH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPV.Check BCH's competition here
SUPV vs KEY-PK Comparison April 2026
SUPV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPV stands at 780.9M. In comparison, KEY-PK has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPV is priced at $8.92, while KEY-PK trades at $21.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPV currently has a P/E ratio of -28.77, whereas KEY-PK's P/E ratio is 15.02. In terms of profitability, SUPV's ROE is -0.05%, compared to KEY-PK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPV is more volatile compared to KEY-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPV.Check KEY-PK's competition here
SUPV vs FITBP Comparison April 2026
SUPV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPV stands at 780.9M. In comparison, FITBP has a market cap of 16.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPV is priced at $8.92, while FITBP trades at $23.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPV currently has a P/E ratio of -28.77, whereas FITBP's P/E ratio is 6.86. In terms of profitability, SUPV's ROE is -0.05%, compared to FITBP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPV is more volatile compared to FITBP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPV.Check FITBP's competition here
SUPV vs FITBI Comparison April 2026
SUPV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPV stands at 780.9M. In comparison, FITBI has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPV is priced at $8.92, while FITBI trades at $25.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPV currently has a P/E ratio of -28.77, whereas FITBI's P/E ratio is 7.28. In terms of profitability, SUPV's ROE is -0.05%, compared to FITBI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPV is more volatile compared to FITBI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPV.Check FITBI's competition here
SUPV vs WF Comparison April 2026
SUPV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPV stands at 780.9M. In comparison, WF has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPV is priced at $8.92, while WF trades at $67.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPV currently has a P/E ratio of -28.77, whereas WF's P/E ratio is 8.26. In terms of profitability, SUPV's ROE is -0.05%, compared to WF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPV is more volatile compared to WF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPV.Check WF's competition here
SUPV vs CIB Comparison April 2026
SUPV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPV stands at 780.9M. In comparison, CIB has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPV is priced at $8.92, while CIB trades at $68.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPV currently has a P/E ratio of -28.77, whereas CIB's P/E ratio is 8.70. In terms of profitability, SUPV's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CIB's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPV is less volatile compared to CIB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPV.Check CIB's competition here
SUPV vs BSAC Comparison April 2026
SUPV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPV stands at 780.9M. In comparison, BSAC has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPV is priced at $8.92, while BSAC trades at $33.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPV currently has a P/E ratio of -28.77, whereas BSAC's P/E ratio is 13.51. In terms of profitability, SUPV's ROE is -0.05%, compared to BSAC's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPV is more volatile compared to BSAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPV.Check BSAC's competition here
SUPV vs CFG-PD Comparison April 2026
SUPV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPV stands at 780.9M. In comparison, CFG-PD has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPV is priced at $8.92, while CFG-PD trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPV currently has a P/E ratio of -28.77, whereas CFG-PD's P/E ratio is 5.29. In terms of profitability, SUPV's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CFG-PD's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPV is more volatile compared to CFG-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPV.Check CFG-PD's competition here
SUPV vs RF-PE Comparison April 2026
SUPV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPV stands at 780.9M. In comparison, RF-PE has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPV is priced at $8.92, while RF-PE trades at $16.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPV currently has a P/E ratio of -28.77, whereas RF-PE's P/E ratio is 6.96. In terms of profitability, SUPV's ROE is -0.05%, compared to RF-PE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPV is more volatile compared to RF-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPV.Check RF-PE's competition here
SUPV vs VLYPN Comparison April 2026
SUPV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPV stands at 780.9M. In comparison, VLYPN has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPV is priced at $8.92, while VLYPN trades at $26.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPV currently has a P/E ratio of -28.77, whereas VLYPN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUPV's ROE is -0.05%, compared to VLYPN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPV is more volatile compared to VLYPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPV.Check VLYPN's competition here
SUPV vs FITBO Comparison April 2026
SUPV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPV stands at 780.9M. In comparison, FITBO has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPV is priced at $8.92, while FITBO trades at $19.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPV currently has a P/E ratio of -28.77, whereas FITBO's P/E ratio is 5.56. In terms of profitability, SUPV's ROE is -0.05%, compared to FITBO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPV is more volatile compared to FITBO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPV.Check FITBO's competition here
SUPV vs FHN-PB Comparison April 2026
SUPV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPV stands at 780.9M. In comparison, FHN-PB has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPV is priced at $8.92, while FHN-PB trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPV currently has a P/E ratio of -28.77, whereas FHN-PB's P/E ratio is 14.88. In terms of profitability, SUPV's ROE is -0.05%, compared to FHN-PB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPV is more volatile compared to FHN-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPV.Check FHN-PB's competition here
SUPV vs FHN-PE Comparison April 2026
SUPV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPV stands at 780.9M. In comparison, FHN-PE has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPV is priced at $8.92, while FHN-PE trades at $24.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPV currently has a P/E ratio of -28.77, whereas FHN-PE's P/E ratio is 14.73. In terms of profitability, SUPV's ROE is -0.05%, compared to FHN-PE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPV is more volatile compared to FHN-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPV.Check FHN-PE's competition here
SUPV vs CFG-PH Comparison April 2026
SUPV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPV stands at 780.9M. In comparison, CFG-PH has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPV is priced at $8.92, while CFG-PH trades at $25.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPV currently has a P/E ratio of -28.77, whereas CFG-PH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUPV's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CFG-PH's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPV is more volatile compared to CFG-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPV.Check CFG-PH's competition here
SUPV vs FHN-PC Comparison April 2026
SUPV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPV stands at 780.9M. In comparison, FHN-PC has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPV is priced at $8.92, while FHN-PC trades at $24.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPV currently has a P/E ratio of -28.77, whereas FHN-PC's P/E ratio is 14.87. In terms of profitability, SUPV's ROE is -0.05%, compared to FHN-PC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPV is more volatile compared to FHN-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPV.Check FHN-PC's competition here
SUPV vs FHN Comparison April 2026
SUPV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPV stands at 780.9M. In comparison, FHN has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPV is priced at $8.92, while FHN trades at $24.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPV currently has a P/E ratio of -28.77, whereas FHN's P/E ratio is 12.39. In terms of profitability, SUPV's ROE is -0.05%, compared to FHN's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPV is more volatile compared to FHN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPV.Check FHN's competition here
SUPV vs WBS Comparison April 2026
SUPV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPV stands at 780.9M. In comparison, WBS has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPV is priced at $8.92, while WBS trades at $72.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPV currently has a P/E ratio of -28.77, whereas WBS's P/E ratio is 12.21. In terms of profitability, SUPV's ROE is -0.05%, compared to WBS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPV is more volatile compared to WBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPV.Check WBS's competition here
SUPV vs CMA Comparison April 2026
SUPV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPV stands at 780.9M. In comparison, CMA has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPV is priced at $8.92, while CMA trades at $88.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPV currently has a P/E ratio of -28.77, whereas CMA's P/E ratio is 16.79. In terms of profitability, SUPV's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CMA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPV is less volatile compared to CMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPV.Check CMA's competition here
SUPV vs WTFC Comparison April 2026
SUPV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPV stands at 780.9M. In comparison, WTFC has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPV is priced at $8.92, while WTFC trades at $150.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPV currently has a P/E ratio of -28.77, whereas WTFC's P/E ratio is 12.63. In terms of profitability, SUPV's ROE is -0.05%, compared to WTFC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPV is more volatile compared to WTFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPV.Check WTFC's competition here
SUPV vs BPOP Comparison April 2026
SUPV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPV stands at 780.9M. In comparison, BPOP has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPV is priced at $8.92, while BPOP trades at $150.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPV currently has a P/E ratio of -28.77, whereas BPOP's P/E ratio is 11.14. In terms of profitability, SUPV's ROE is -0.05%, compared to BPOP's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPV is more volatile compared to BPOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPV.Check BPOP's competition here
SUPV vs SSB Comparison April 2026
SUPV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPV stands at 780.9M. In comparison, SSB has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPV is priced at $8.92, while SSB trades at $98.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPV currently has a P/E ratio of -28.77, whereas SSB's P/E ratio is 10.60. In terms of profitability, SUPV's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SSB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPV is more volatile compared to SSB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPV.Check SSB's competition here
SUPV vs UMBF Comparison April 2026
SUPV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPV stands at 780.9M. In comparison, UMBF has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPV is priced at $8.92, while UMBF trades at $125.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPV currently has a P/E ratio of -28.77, whereas UMBF's P/E ratio is 13.49. In terms of profitability, SUPV's ROE is -0.05%, compared to UMBF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPV is more volatile compared to UMBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPV.Check UMBF's competition here
SUPV vs ONBPP Comparison April 2026
SUPV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPV stands at 780.9M. In comparison, ONBPP has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPV is priced at $8.92, while ONBPP trades at $24.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPV currently has a P/E ratio of -28.77, whereas ONBPP's P/E ratio is 28.01. In terms of profitability, SUPV's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ONBPP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPV is more volatile compared to ONBPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPV.Check ONBPP's competition here
SUPV vs ONBPO Comparison April 2026
SUPV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPV stands at 780.9M. In comparison, ONBPO has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPV is priced at $8.92, while ONBPO trades at $24.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPV currently has a P/E ratio of -28.77, whereas ONBPO's P/E ratio is 27.98. In terms of profitability, SUPV's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ONBPO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPV is more volatile compared to ONBPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPV.Check ONBPO's competition here
SUPV vs ZION Comparison April 2026
SUPV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPV stands at 780.9M. In comparison, ZION has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPV is priced at $8.92, while ZION trades at $63.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPV currently has a P/E ratio of -28.77, whereas ZION's P/E ratio is 9.81. In terms of profitability, SUPV's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ZION's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPV is more volatile compared to ZION. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPV.Check ZION's competition here
SUPV vs ONB Comparison April 2026
SUPV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPV stands at 780.9M. In comparison, ONB has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPV is priced at $8.92, while ONB trades at $23.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPV currently has a P/E ratio of -28.77, whereas ONB's P/E ratio is 12.36. In terms of profitability, SUPV's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ONB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPV is more volatile compared to ONB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPV.Check ONB's competition here
SUPV vs CFR Comparison April 2026
SUPV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPV stands at 780.9M. In comparison, CFR has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPV is priced at $8.92, while CFR trades at $143.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPV currently has a P/E ratio of -28.77, whereas CFR's P/E ratio is 14.80. In terms of profitability, SUPV's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CFR's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPV is more volatile compared to CFR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPV.Check CFR's competition here
SUPV vs FHN-PD Comparison April 2026
SUPV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPV stands at 780.9M. In comparison, FHN-PD has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPV is priced at $8.92, while FHN-PD trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPV currently has a P/E ratio of -28.77, whereas FHN-PD's P/E ratio is 14.88. In terms of profitability, SUPV's ROE is -0.05%, compared to FHN-PD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPV is more volatile compared to FHN-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPV.Check FHN-PD's competition here
SUPV vs WAL Comparison April 2026
SUPV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPV stands at 780.9M. In comparison, WAL has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPV is priced at $8.92, while WAL trades at $80.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPV currently has a P/E ratio of -28.77, whereas WAL's P/E ratio is 9.36. In terms of profitability, SUPV's ROE is -0.05%, compared to WAL's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPV is more volatile compared to WAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPV.Check WAL's competition here
SUPV vs FHN-PF Comparison April 2026
SUPV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPV stands at 780.9M. In comparison, FHN-PF has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPV is priced at $8.92, while FHN-PF trades at $17.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPV currently has a P/E ratio of -28.77, whereas FHN-PF's P/E ratio is 10.53. In terms of profitability, SUPV's ROE is -0.05%, compared to FHN-PF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPV is more volatile compared to FHN-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPV.Check FHN-PF's competition here
SUPV vs CFG-PE Comparison April 2026
SUPV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPV stands at 780.9M. In comparison, CFG-PE has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPV is priced at $8.92, while CFG-PE trades at $19.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPV currently has a P/E ratio of -28.77, whereas CFG-PE's P/E ratio is 4.10. In terms of profitability, SUPV's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CFG-PE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPV is more volatile compared to CFG-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPV.Check CFG-PE's competition here
SUPV vs CHYM Comparison April 2026
SUPV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPV stands at 780.9M. In comparison, CHYM has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPV is priced at $8.92, while CHYM trades at $21.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPV currently has a P/E ratio of -28.77, whereas CHYM's P/E ratio is -5.06. In terms of profitability, SUPV's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CHYM's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPV is less volatile compared to CHYM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPV.Check CHYM's competition here
SUPV vs BOKF Comparison April 2026
SUPV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPV stands at 780.9M. In comparison, BOKF has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPV is priced at $8.92, while BOKF trades at $133.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPV currently has a P/E ratio of -28.77, whereas BOKF's P/E ratio is 13.55. In terms of profitability, SUPV's ROE is -0.05%, compared to BOKF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPV is more volatile compared to BOKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPV.Check BOKF's competition here
SUPV vs CADE Comparison April 2026
SUPV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPV stands at 780.9M. In comparison, CADE has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPV is priced at $8.92, while CADE trades at $42.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPV currently has a P/E ratio of -28.77, whereas CADE's P/E ratio is 15.20. In terms of profitability, SUPV's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CADE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPV is less volatile compared to CADE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPV.Check CADE's competition here
SUPV vs CBSH Comparison April 2026
SUPV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPV stands at 780.9M. In comparison, CBSH has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPV is priced at $8.92, while CBSH trades at $51.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPV currently has a P/E ratio of -28.77, whereas CBSH's P/E ratio is 12.80. In terms of profitability, SUPV's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CBSH's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPV is more volatile compared to CBSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPV.Check CBSH's competition here
SUPV vs PNFP Comparison April 2026
SUPV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPV stands at 780.9M. In comparison, PNFP has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPV is priced at $8.92, while PNFP trades at $98.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPV currently has a P/E ratio of -28.77, whereas PNFP's P/E ratio is 12.62. In terms of profitability, SUPV's ROE is -0.05%, compared to PNFP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPV is more volatile compared to PNFP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPV.Check PNFP's competition here
SUPV vs VLY Comparison April 2026
SUPV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPV stands at 780.9M. In comparison, VLY has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPV is priced at $8.92, while VLY trades at $13.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPV currently has a P/E ratio of -28.77, whereas VLY's P/E ratio is 12.27. In terms of profitability, SUPV's ROE is -0.05%, compared to VLY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPV is more volatile compared to VLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPV.Check VLY's competition here
SUPV vs BSMX Comparison April 2026
SUPV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPV stands at 780.9M. In comparison, BSMX has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPV is priced at $8.92, while BSMX trades at $5.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPV currently has a P/E ratio of -28.77, whereas BSMX's P/E ratio is 4.88. In terms of profitability, SUPV's ROE is -0.05%, compared to BSMX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPV is less volatile compared to BSMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPV.Check BSMX's competition here
SUPV vs PB Comparison April 2026
SUPV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPV stands at 780.9M. In comparison, PB has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPV is priced at $8.92, while PB trades at $69.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPV currently has a P/E ratio of -28.77, whereas PB's P/E ratio is 12.15. In terms of profitability, SUPV's ROE is -0.05%, compared to PB's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPV is more volatile compared to PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPV.Check PB's competition here
SUPV vs COLB Comparison April 2026
SUPV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPV stands at 780.9M. In comparison, COLB has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPV is priced at $8.92, while COLB trades at $29.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPV currently has a P/E ratio of -28.77, whereas COLB's P/E ratio is 11.62. In terms of profitability, SUPV's ROE is -0.05%, compared to COLB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPV is more volatile compared to COLB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPV.Check COLB's competition here
SUPV vs GGAL Comparison April 2026
SUPV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPV stands at 780.9M. In comparison, GGAL has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPV is priced at $8.92, while GGAL trades at $43.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPV currently has a P/E ratio of -28.77, whereas GGAL's P/E ratio is 45.88. In terms of profitability, SUPV's ROE is -0.05%, compared to GGAL's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPV is less volatile compared to GGAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPV.Check GGAL's competition here
SUPV vs SNV Comparison April 2026
SUPV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPV stands at 780.9M. In comparison, SNV has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPV is priced at $8.92, while SNV trades at $50.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPV currently has a P/E ratio of -28.77, whereas SNV's P/E ratio is 9.37. In terms of profitability, SUPV's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SNV's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPV is more volatile compared to SNV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPV.Check SNV's competition here
SUPV vs SNV-PD Comparison April 2026
SUPV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPV stands at 780.9M. In comparison, SNV-PD has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPV is priced at $8.92, while SNV-PD trades at $25.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPV currently has a P/E ratio of -28.77, whereas SNV-PD's P/E ratio is 5.25. In terms of profitability, SUPV's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SNV-PD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPV is more volatile compared to SNV-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPV.Check SNV-PD's competition here
SUPV vs CUBI-PE Comparison April 2026
SUPV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPV stands at 780.9M. In comparison, CUBI-PE has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPV is priced at $8.92, while CUBI-PE trades at $205.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPV currently has a P/E ratio of -28.77, whereas CUBI-PE's P/E ratio is 20.53. In terms of profitability, SUPV's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CUBI-PE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPV is less volatile compared to CUBI-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPV.Check CUBI-PE's competition here
SUPV vs GBCI Comparison April 2026
SUPV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPV stands at 780.9M. In comparison, GBCI has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPV is priced at $8.92, while GBCI trades at $49.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPV currently has a P/E ratio of -28.77, whereas GBCI's P/E ratio is 24.84. In terms of profitability, SUPV's ROE is -0.05%, compared to GBCI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPV is more volatile compared to GBCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPV.Check GBCI's competition here
SUPV vs FNB Comparison April 2026
SUPV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPV stands at 780.9M. In comparison, FNB has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPV is priced at $8.92, while FNB trades at $17.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPV currently has a P/E ratio of -28.77, whereas FNB's P/E ratio is 10.95. In terms of profitability, SUPV's ROE is -0.05%, compared to FNB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPV is more volatile compared to FNB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPV.Check FNB's competition here
SUPV vs CBC Comparison April 2026
SUPV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPV stands at 780.9M. In comparison, CBC has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPV is priced at $8.92, while CBC trades at $25.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPV currently has a P/E ratio of -28.77, whereas CBC's P/E ratio is 863.00. In terms of profitability, SUPV's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CBC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SUPV is less volatile compared to CBC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPV.Check CBC's competition here
SUPV vs UBSI Comparison April 2026
SUPV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPV stands at 780.9M. In comparison, UBSI has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPV is priced at $8.92, while UBSI trades at $44.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPV currently has a P/E ratio of -28.77, whereas UBSI's P/E ratio is 12.35. In terms of profitability, SUPV's ROE is -0.05%, compared to UBSI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPV is more volatile compared to UBSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPV.Check UBSI's competition here
SUPV vs ABCB Comparison April 2026
SUPV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPV stands at 780.9M. In comparison, ABCB has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPV is priced at $8.92, while ABCB trades at $85.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPV currently has a P/E ratio of -28.77, whereas ABCB's P/E ratio is 13.47. In terms of profitability, SUPV's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ABCB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPV is more volatile compared to ABCB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPV.Check ABCB's competition here
SUPV vs FLG Comparison April 2026
SUPV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPV stands at 780.9M. In comparison, FLG has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPV is priced at $8.92, while FLG trades at $14.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPV currently has a P/E ratio of -28.77, whereas FLG's P/E ratio is -28.02. In terms of profitability, SUPV's ROE is -0.05%, compared to FLG's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPV is more volatile compared to FLG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPV.Check FLG's competition here
SUPV vs AX Comparison April 2026
SUPV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPV stands at 780.9M. In comparison, AX has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPV is priced at $8.92, while AX trades at $98.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPV currently has a P/E ratio of -28.77, whereas AX's P/E ratio is 12.54. In terms of profitability, SUPV's ROE is -0.05%, compared to AX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPV is more volatile compared to AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPV.Check AX's competition here
SUPV vs HWC Comparison April 2026
SUPV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPV stands at 780.9M. In comparison, HWC has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPV is priced at $8.92, while HWC trades at $67.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPV currently has a P/E ratio of -28.77, whereas HWC's P/E ratio is 13.84. In terms of profitability, SUPV's ROE is -0.05%, compared to HWC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPV is more volatile compared to HWC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPV.Check HWC's competition here
SUPV vs HOMB Comparison April 2026
SUPV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPV stands at 780.9M. In comparison, HOMB has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPV is priced at $8.92, while HOMB trades at $27.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPV currently has a P/E ratio of -28.77, whereas HOMB's P/E ratio is 11.13. In terms of profitability, SUPV's ROE is -0.05%, compared to HOMB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPV is more volatile compared to HOMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPV.Check HOMB's competition here
SUPV vs AUB Comparison April 2026
SUPV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPV stands at 780.9M. In comparison, AUB has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPV is priced at $8.92, while AUB trades at $38.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPV currently has a P/E ratio of -28.77, whereas AUB's P/E ratio is 16.29. In terms of profitability, SUPV's ROE is -0.05%, compared to AUB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPV is more volatile compared to AUB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPV.Check AUB's competition here
SUPV vs VLYPP Comparison April 2026
SUPV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPV stands at 780.9M. In comparison, VLYPP has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPV is priced at $8.92, while VLYPP trades at $25.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPV currently has a P/E ratio of -28.77, whereas VLYPP's P/E ratio is 22.79. In terms of profitability, SUPV's ROE is -0.05%, compared to VLYPP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPV is more volatile compared to VLYPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPV.Check VLYPP's competition here
SUPV vs VLYPO Comparison April 2026
SUPV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPV stands at 780.9M. In comparison, VLYPO has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPV is priced at $8.92, while VLYPO trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPV currently has a P/E ratio of -28.77, whereas VLYPO's P/E ratio is 22.52. In terms of profitability, SUPV's ROE is -0.05%, compared to VLYPO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPV is more volatile compared to VLYPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPV.Check VLYPO's competition here
SUPV vs AVAL Comparison April 2026
SUPV plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUPV stands at 780.9M. In comparison, AVAL has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SUPV is priced at $8.92, while AVAL trades at $4.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUPV currently has a P/E ratio of -28.77, whereas AVAL's P/E ratio is 11.62. In terms of profitability, SUPV's ROE is -0.05%, compared to AVAL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SUPV is more volatile compared to AVAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUPV.Check AVAL's competition here