SU Group Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares
SU Group Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares (SUGP) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SUGP) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Security & Protection Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SUGP | $5.06 | -1.36% | 70.1M | -2.96 | -$1.71 | N/A |
| ALLE | $145.35 | +0.03% | 12.5B | 19.55 | $7.43 | +1.43% |
| MSA | $177.22 | -1.24% | 6.9B | 25.00 | $7.09 | +1.19% |
| REZI | $33.56 | +0.03% | 5.1B | -8.90 | -$3.77 | N/A |
| ADT | $6.41 | +0.55% | 4.9B | 9.43 | $0.68 | +3.43% |
| BCO | $107.07 | -0.21% | 4.4B | 22.79 | $4.70 | +0.95% |
| BRC | $85.12 | -0.29% | 4B | 19.94 | $4.27 | +1.15% |
| VVNT | $12.00 | +0.00% | 2.6B | -50.00 | -$0.24 | N/A |
| GEO | $14.55 | +3.19% | 2B | 8.00 | $1.82 | N/A |
| NSSC | $42.57 | +1.00% | 1.5B | 32.25 | $1.32 | +1.34% |
Stock Comparison
SUGP vs ALLE Comparison March 2026
SUGP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUGP stands at 70.1M. In comparison, ALLE has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SUGP is priced at $5.06, while ALLE trades at $145.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUGP currently has a P/E ratio of -2.96, whereas ALLE's P/E ratio is 19.55. In terms of profitability, SUGP's ROE is -0.19%, compared to ALLE's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, SUGP is more volatile compared to ALLE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUGP.Check ALLE's competition here
SUGP vs MSA Comparison March 2026
SUGP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUGP stands at 70.1M. In comparison, MSA has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SUGP is priced at $5.06, while MSA trades at $177.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUGP currently has a P/E ratio of -2.96, whereas MSA's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, SUGP's ROE is -0.19%, compared to MSA's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SUGP is more volatile compared to MSA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUGP.Check MSA's competition here
SUGP vs REZI Comparison March 2026
SUGP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUGP stands at 70.1M. In comparison, REZI has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SUGP is priced at $5.06, while REZI trades at $33.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUGP currently has a P/E ratio of -2.96, whereas REZI's P/E ratio is -8.90. In terms of profitability, SUGP's ROE is -0.19%, compared to REZI's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SUGP is less volatile compared to REZI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUGP.Check REZI's competition here
SUGP vs ADT Comparison March 2026
SUGP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUGP stands at 70.1M. In comparison, ADT has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SUGP is priced at $5.06, while ADT trades at $6.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUGP currently has a P/E ratio of -2.96, whereas ADT's P/E ratio is 9.43. In terms of profitability, SUGP's ROE is -0.19%, compared to ADT's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SUGP is more volatile compared to ADT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUGP.Check ADT's competition here
SUGP vs BCO Comparison March 2026
SUGP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUGP stands at 70.1M. In comparison, BCO has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SUGP is priced at $5.06, while BCO trades at $107.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUGP currently has a P/E ratio of -2.96, whereas BCO's P/E ratio is 22.79. In terms of profitability, SUGP's ROE is -0.19%, compared to BCO's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, SUGP is more volatile compared to BCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUGP.Check BCO's competition here
SUGP vs BRC Comparison March 2026
SUGP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUGP stands at 70.1M. In comparison, BRC has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, SUGP is priced at $5.06, while BRC trades at $85.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUGP currently has a P/E ratio of -2.96, whereas BRC's P/E ratio is 19.94. In terms of profitability, SUGP's ROE is -0.19%, compared to BRC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SUGP is more volatile compared to BRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUGP.Check BRC's competition here
SUGP vs VVNT Comparison March 2026
SUGP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUGP stands at 70.1M. In comparison, VVNT has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SUGP is priced at $5.06, while VVNT trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUGP currently has a P/E ratio of -2.96, whereas VVNT's P/E ratio is -50.00. In terms of profitability, SUGP's ROE is -0.19%, compared to VVNT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SUGP is more volatile compared to VVNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUGP.Check VVNT's competition here
SUGP vs GEO Comparison March 2026
SUGP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUGP stands at 70.1M. In comparison, GEO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, SUGP is priced at $5.06, while GEO trades at $14.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUGP currently has a P/E ratio of -2.96, whereas GEO's P/E ratio is 8.00. In terms of profitability, SUGP's ROE is -0.19%, compared to GEO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SUGP is less volatile compared to GEO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUGP.Check GEO's competition here
SUGP vs NSSC Comparison March 2026
SUGP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUGP stands at 70.1M. In comparison, NSSC has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SUGP is priced at $5.06, while NSSC trades at $42.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUGP currently has a P/E ratio of -2.96, whereas NSSC's P/E ratio is 32.25. In terms of profitability, SUGP's ROE is -0.19%, compared to NSSC's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SUGP is more volatile compared to NSSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUGP.Check NSSC's competition here
SUGP vs ARLO Comparison March 2026
SUGP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUGP stands at 70.1M. In comparison, ARLO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SUGP is priced at $5.06, while ARLO trades at $13.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUGP currently has a P/E ratio of -2.96, whereas ARLO's P/E ratio is 97.14. In terms of profitability, SUGP's ROE is -0.19%, compared to ARLO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SUGP is less volatile compared to ARLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUGP.Check ARLO's competition here
SUGP vs EVLV Comparison March 2026
SUGP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUGP stands at 70.1M. In comparison, EVLV has a market cap of 892.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SUGP is priced at $5.06, while EVLV trades at $5.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUGP currently has a P/E ratio of -2.96, whereas EVLV's P/E ratio is -14.60. In terms of profitability, SUGP's ROE is -0.19%, compared to EVLV's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SUGP is less volatile compared to EVLV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUGP.Check EVLV's competition here
SUGP vs MG Comparison March 2026
SUGP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUGP stands at 70.1M. In comparison, MG has a market cap of 445.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SUGP is priced at $5.06, while MG trades at $14.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUGP currently has a P/E ratio of -2.96, whereas MG's P/E ratio is 24.77. In terms of profitability, SUGP's ROE is -0.19%, compared to MG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SUGP is less volatile compared to MG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUGP.Check MG's competition here
SUGP vs CIX Comparison March 2026
SUGP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUGP stands at 70.1M. In comparison, CIX has a market cap of 295.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SUGP is priced at $5.06, while CIX trades at $24.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUGP currently has a P/E ratio of -2.96, whereas CIX's P/E ratio is 15.16. In terms of profitability, SUGP's ROE is -0.19%, compared to CIX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SUGP is more volatile compared to CIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUGP.Check CIX's competition here
SUGP vs NL Comparison March 2026
SUGP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUGP stands at 70.1M. In comparison, NL has a market cap of 290.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SUGP is priced at $5.06, while NL trades at $5.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUGP currently has a P/E ratio of -2.96, whereas NL's P/E ratio is 29.71. In terms of profitability, SUGP's ROE is -0.19%, compared to NL's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SUGP is more volatile compared to NL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUGP.Check NL's competition here
SUGP vs BAER Comparison March 2026
SUGP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUGP stands at 70.1M. In comparison, BAER has a market cap of 111.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SUGP is priced at $5.06, while BAER trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUGP currently has a P/E ratio of -2.96, whereas BAER's P/E ratio is -4.76. In terms of profitability, SUGP's ROE is -0.19%, compared to BAER's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SUGP is less volatile compared to BAER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUGP.Check BAER's competition here
SUGP vs SNT Comparison March 2026
SUGP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUGP stands at 70.1M. In comparison, SNT has a market cap of 72.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SUGP is priced at $5.06, while SNT trades at $3.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUGP currently has a P/E ratio of -2.96, whereas SNT's P/E ratio is 14.71. In terms of profitability, SUGP's ROE is -0.19%, compared to SNT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SUGP is less volatile compared to SNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUGP.Check SNT's competition here
SUGP vs NXTD Comparison March 2026
SUGP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUGP stands at 70.1M. In comparison, NXTD has a market cap of 57.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SUGP is priced at $5.06, while NXTD trades at $2.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUGP currently has a P/E ratio of -2.96, whereas NXTD's P/E ratio is -1.19. In terms of profitability, SUGP's ROE is -0.19%, compared to NXTD's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, SUGP is less volatile compared to NXTD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUGP.Check NXTD's competition here
SUGP vs SPCB Comparison March 2026
SUGP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUGP stands at 70.1M. In comparison, SPCB has a market cap of 37.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SUGP is priced at $5.06, while SPCB trades at $7.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUGP currently has a P/E ratio of -2.96, whereas SPCB's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, SUGP's ROE is -0.19%, compared to SPCB's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SUGP is less volatile compared to SPCB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUGP.Check SPCB's competition here
SUGP vs KSCP Comparison March 2026
SUGP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUGP stands at 70.1M. In comparison, KSCP has a market cap of 31.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SUGP is priced at $5.06, while KSCP trades at $3.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUGP currently has a P/E ratio of -2.96, whereas KSCP's P/E ratio is -0.99. In terms of profitability, SUGP's ROE is -0.19%, compared to KSCP's ROE of -1.57%. Regarding short-term risk, SUGP is less volatile compared to KSCP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUGP.Check KSCP's competition here
SUGP vs BAERW Comparison March 2026
SUGP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUGP stands at 70.1M. In comparison, BAERW has a market cap of 23.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SUGP is priced at $5.06, while BAERW trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUGP currently has a P/E ratio of -2.96, whereas BAERW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUGP's ROE is -0.19%, compared to BAERW's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SUGP is less volatile compared to BAERW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUGP.Check BAERW's competition here
SUGP vs UUU Comparison March 2026
SUGP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUGP stands at 70.1M. In comparison, UUU has a market cap of 14M. Regarding current trading prices, SUGP is priced at $5.06, while UUU trades at $5.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUGP currently has a P/E ratio of -2.96, whereas UUU's P/E ratio is -86.71. In terms of profitability, SUGP's ROE is -0.19%, compared to UUU's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SUGP is less volatile compared to UUU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUGP.Check UUU's competition here
SUGP vs EVLVW Comparison March 2026
SUGP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUGP stands at 70.1M. In comparison, EVLVW has a market cap of 12.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SUGP is priced at $5.06, while EVLVW trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUGP currently has a P/E ratio of -2.96, whereas EVLVW's P/E ratio is -0.66. In terms of profitability, SUGP's ROE is -0.19%, compared to EVLVW's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SUGP is less volatile compared to EVLVW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUGP.Check EVLVW's competition here
SUGP vs GFAI Comparison March 2026
SUGP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUGP stands at 70.1M. In comparison, GFAI has a market cap of 11.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SUGP is priced at $5.06, while GFAI trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUGP currently has a P/E ratio of -2.96, whereas GFAI's P/E ratio is -1.19. In terms of profitability, SUGP's ROE is -0.19%, compared to GFAI's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SUGP is less volatile compared to GFAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUGP.Check GFAI's competition here
SUGP vs VRME Comparison March 2026
SUGP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUGP stands at 70.1M. In comparison, VRME has a market cap of 11.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SUGP is priced at $5.06, while VRME trades at $0.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUGP currently has a P/E ratio of -2.96, whereas VRME's P/E ratio is -2.34. In terms of profitability, SUGP's ROE is -0.19%, compared to VRME's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, SUGP is less volatile compared to VRME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUGP.Check VRME's competition here
SUGP vs IVDAW Comparison March 2026
SUGP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUGP stands at 70.1M. In comparison, IVDAW has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, SUGP is priced at $5.06, while IVDAW trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUGP currently has a P/E ratio of -2.96, whereas IVDAW's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, SUGP's ROE is -0.19%, compared to IVDAW's ROE of -1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, SUGP is more volatile compared to IVDAW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUGP.Check IVDAW's competition here
SUGP vs BKYI Comparison March 2026
SUGP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUGP stands at 70.1M. In comparison, BKYI has a market cap of 4.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SUGP is priced at $5.06, while BKYI trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUGP currently has a P/E ratio of -2.96, whereas BKYI's P/E ratio is -0.72. In terms of profitability, SUGP's ROE is -0.19%, compared to BKYI's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, SUGP is less volatile compared to BKYI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUGP.Check BKYI's competition here
SUGP vs CIGL Comparison March 2026
SUGP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUGP stands at 70.1M. In comparison, CIGL has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SUGP is priced at $5.06, while CIGL trades at $1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUGP currently has a P/E ratio of -2.96, whereas CIGL's P/E ratio is -11.00. In terms of profitability, SUGP's ROE is -0.19%, compared to CIGL's ROE of -35.79%. Regarding short-term risk, SUGP is less volatile compared to CIGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUGP.Check CIGL's competition here
SUGP vs GFAIW Comparison March 2026
SUGP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUGP stands at 70.1M. In comparison, GFAIW has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SUGP is priced at $5.06, while GFAIW trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUGP currently has a P/E ratio of -2.96, whereas GFAIW's P/E ratio is -0.38. In terms of profitability, SUGP's ROE is -0.19%, compared to GFAIW's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SUGP is less volatile compared to GFAIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUGP.Check GFAIW's competition here
SUGP vs IVDA Comparison March 2026
SUGP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUGP stands at 70.1M. In comparison, IVDA has a market cap of 839.2K. Regarding current trading prices, SUGP is priced at $5.06, while IVDA trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUGP currently has a P/E ratio of -2.96, whereas IVDA's P/E ratio is -0.26. In terms of profitability, SUGP's ROE is -0.19%, compared to IVDA's ROE of -1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, SUGP is less volatile compared to IVDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUGP.Check IVDA's competition here
SUGP vs LGMK Comparison March 2026
SUGP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUGP stands at 70.1M. In comparison, LGMK has a market cap of 334.4K. Regarding current trading prices, SUGP is priced at $5.06, while LGMK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUGP currently has a P/E ratio of -2.96, whereas LGMK's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, SUGP's ROE is -0.19%, compared to LGMK's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. SUGP has daily volatility of 3.31 and LGMK has daily volatility of N/A.Check LGMK's competition here
SUGP vs VRMEW Comparison March 2026
SUGP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SUGP stands at 70.1M. In comparison, VRMEW has a market cap of 172.8K. Regarding current trading prices, SUGP is priced at $5.06, while VRMEW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SUGP currently has a P/E ratio of -2.96, whereas VRMEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SUGP's ROE is -0.19%, compared to VRMEW's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, SUGP is less volatile compared to VRMEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SUGP.Check VRMEW's competition here