Mistras Group, Inc.
Mistras Group, Inc. (MG) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (MG) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Security & Protection Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MG | $17.66 | +2.65% | 549.8M | 24.69 | $0.70 | N/A |
| ALLE | $131.39 | +0.53% | 11.2B | 17.82 | $7.32 | +1.59% |
| MSA | $170.61 | +1.22% | 6.6B | 23.10 | $7.40 | +1.25% |
| ADT | $6.98 | -0.36% | 5.1B | 9.17 | $0.76 | +3.16% |
| REZI | $29.30 | +0.98% | 4.4B | -8.03 | -$3.58 | N/A |
| BCO | $105.78 | +0.94% | 4.3B | 24.47 | $4.28 | +0.97% |
| BRC | $87.16 | +3.07% | 4.1B | 19.89 | $4.40 | +1.11% |
| GEO | $23.34 | +1.00% | 3.1B | 11.94 | $1.97 | N/A |
| VVNT | $12.00 | +0.00% | 2.6B | -50.00 | -$0.24 | N/A |
| ARLO | $13.06 | +2.59% | 1.4B | 47.00 | $0.28 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
MG vs ALLE Comparison May 2026
MG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MG stands at 549.8M. In comparison, ALLE has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MG is priced at $17.66, while ALLE trades at $131.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MG currently has a P/E ratio of 24.69, whereas ALLE's P/E ratio is 17.82. In terms of profitability, MG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ALLE's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, MG is more volatile compared to ALLE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MG.Check ALLE's competition here
MG vs MSA Comparison May 2026
MG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MG stands at 549.8M. In comparison, MSA has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MG is priced at $17.66, while MSA trades at $170.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MG currently has a P/E ratio of 24.69, whereas MSA's P/E ratio is 23.10. In terms of profitability, MG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MSA's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MG is more volatile compared to MSA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MG.Check MSA's competition here
MG vs ADT Comparison May 2026
MG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MG stands at 549.8M. In comparison, ADT has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MG is priced at $17.66, while ADT trades at $6.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MG currently has a P/E ratio of 24.69, whereas ADT's P/E ratio is 9.17. In terms of profitability, MG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ADT's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MG is more volatile compared to ADT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MG.Check ADT's competition here
MG vs REZI Comparison May 2026
MG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MG stands at 549.8M. In comparison, REZI has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MG is priced at $17.66, while REZI trades at $29.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MG currently has a P/E ratio of 24.69, whereas REZI's P/E ratio is -8.03. In terms of profitability, MG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to REZI's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MG is less volatile compared to REZI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MG.Check REZI's competition here
MG vs BCO Comparison May 2026
MG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MG stands at 549.8M. In comparison, BCO has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MG is priced at $17.66, while BCO trades at $105.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MG currently has a P/E ratio of 24.69, whereas BCO's P/E ratio is 24.47. In terms of profitability, MG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BCO's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, MG is less volatile compared to BCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MG.Check BCO's competition here
MG vs BRC Comparison May 2026
MG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MG stands at 549.8M. In comparison, BRC has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MG is priced at $17.66, while BRC trades at $87.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MG currently has a P/E ratio of 24.69, whereas BRC's P/E ratio is 19.89. In terms of profitability, MG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BRC's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MG is less volatile compared to BRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MG.Check BRC's competition here
MG vs GEO Comparison May 2026
MG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MG stands at 549.8M. In comparison, GEO has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MG is priced at $17.66, while GEO trades at $23.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MG currently has a P/E ratio of 24.69, whereas GEO's P/E ratio is 11.94. In terms of profitability, MG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GEO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MG is more volatile compared to GEO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MG.Check GEO's competition here
MG vs VVNT Comparison May 2026
MG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MG stands at 549.8M. In comparison, VVNT has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MG is priced at $17.66, while VVNT trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MG currently has a P/E ratio of 24.69, whereas VVNT's P/E ratio is -50.00. In terms of profitability, MG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VVNT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MG is more volatile compared to VVNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MG.Check VVNT's competition here
MG vs ARLO Comparison May 2026
MG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MG stands at 549.8M. In comparison, ARLO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MG is priced at $17.66, while ARLO trades at $13.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MG currently has a P/E ratio of 24.69, whereas ARLO's P/E ratio is 47.00. In terms of profitability, MG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ARLO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MG is less volatile compared to ARLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MG.Check ARLO's competition here
MG vs NSSC Comparison May 2026
MG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MG stands at 549.8M. In comparison, NSSC has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MG is priced at $17.66, while NSSC trades at $37.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MG currently has a P/E ratio of 24.69, whereas NSSC's P/E ratio is 36.32. In terms of profitability, MG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NSSC's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MG is more volatile compared to NSSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MG.Check NSSC's competition here
MG vs EVLV Comparison May 2026
MG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MG stands at 549.8M. In comparison, EVLV has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MG is priced at $17.66, while EVLV trades at $6.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MG currently has a P/E ratio of 24.69, whereas EVLV's P/E ratio is -28.36. In terms of profitability, MG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EVLV's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, MG is less volatile compared to EVLV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MG.Check EVLV's competition here
MG vs NL Comparison May 2026
MG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MG stands at 549.8M. In comparison, NL has a market cap of 344.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MG is priced at $17.66, while NL trades at $7.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MG currently has a P/E ratio of 24.69, whereas NL's P/E ratio is -10.22. In terms of profitability, MG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NL's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MG is less volatile compared to NL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MG.Check NL's competition here
MG vs CIX Comparison May 2026
MG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MG stands at 549.8M. In comparison, CIX has a market cap of 287.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MG is priced at $17.66, while CIX trades at $23.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MG currently has a P/E ratio of 24.69, whereas CIX's P/E ratio is 14.21. In terms of profitability, MG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CIX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MG is more volatile compared to CIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MG.Check CIX's competition here
MG vs BAER Comparison May 2026
MG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MG stands at 549.8M. In comparison, BAER has a market cap of 113.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MG is priced at $17.66, while BAER trades at $2.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MG currently has a P/E ratio of 24.69, whereas BAER's P/E ratio is -2.81. In terms of profitability, MG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BAER's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MG is less volatile compared to BAER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MG.Check BAER's competition here
MG vs SNT Comparison May 2026
MG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MG stands at 549.8M. In comparison, SNT has a market cap of 65.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MG is priced at $17.66, while SNT trades at $2.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MG currently has a P/E ratio of 24.69, whereas SNT's P/E ratio is 19.93. In terms of profitability, MG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SNT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MG is more volatile compared to SNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MG.Check SNT's competition here
MG vs NXTD Comparison May 2026
MG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MG stands at 549.8M. In comparison, NXTD has a market cap of 57.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MG is priced at $17.66, while NXTD trades at $2.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MG currently has a P/E ratio of 24.69, whereas NXTD's P/E ratio is -1.19. In terms of profitability, MG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NXTD's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, MG is less volatile compared to NXTD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MG.Check NXTD's competition here
MG vs SPCB Comparison May 2026
MG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MG stands at 549.8M. In comparison, SPCB has a market cap of 49M. Regarding current trading prices, MG is priced at $17.66, while SPCB trades at $11.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MG currently has a P/E ratio of 24.69, whereas SPCB's P/E ratio is 14.69. In terms of profitability, MG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SPCB's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MG is less volatile compared to SPCB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MG.Check SPCB's competition here
MG vs SUGP Comparison May 2026
MG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MG stands at 549.8M. In comparison, SUGP has a market cap of 47.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MG is priced at $17.66, while SUGP trades at $3.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MG currently has a P/E ratio of 24.69, whereas SUGP's P/E ratio is -2.01. In terms of profitability, MG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SUGP's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MG is less volatile compared to SUGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MG.Check SUGP's competition here
MG vs KSCP Comparison May 2026
MG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MG stands at 549.8M. In comparison, KSCP has a market cap of 25.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MG is priced at $17.66, while KSCP trades at $3.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MG currently has a P/E ratio of 24.69, whereas KSCP's P/E ratio is -0.87. In terms of profitability, MG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KSCP's ROE of -1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, MG is less volatile compared to KSCP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MG.Check KSCP's competition here
MG vs BAERW Comparison May 2026
MG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MG stands at 549.8M. In comparison, BAERW has a market cap of 18.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MG is priced at $17.66, while BAERW trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MG currently has a P/E ratio of 24.69, whereas BAERW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BAERW's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MG is less volatile compared to BAERW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MG.Check BAERW's competition here
MG vs UUU Comparison May 2026
MG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MG stands at 549.8M. In comparison, UUU has a market cap of 17.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MG is priced at $17.66, while UUU trades at $7.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MG currently has a P/E ratio of 24.69, whereas UUU's P/E ratio is -106.86. In terms of profitability, MG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to UUU's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MG is more volatile compared to UUU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MG.Check UUU's competition here
MG vs EVLVW Comparison May 2026
MG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MG stands at 549.8M. In comparison, EVLVW has a market cap of 13.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MG is priced at $17.66, while EVLVW trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MG currently has a P/E ratio of 24.69, whereas EVLVW's P/E ratio is -0.72. In terms of profitability, MG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EVLVW's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, MG is less volatile compared to EVLVW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MG.Check EVLVW's competition here
MG vs GFAI Comparison May 2026
MG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MG stands at 549.8M. In comparison, GFAI has a market cap of 10.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MG is priced at $17.66, while GFAI trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MG currently has a P/E ratio of 24.69, whereas GFAI's P/E ratio is -1.99. In terms of profitability, MG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GFAI's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MG is less volatile compared to GFAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MG.Check GFAI's competition here
MG vs VRME Comparison May 2026
MG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MG stands at 549.8M. In comparison, VRME has a market cap of 8.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MG is priced at $17.66, while VRME trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MG currently has a P/E ratio of 24.69, whereas VRME's P/E ratio is -1.70. In terms of profitability, MG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VRME's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, MG is more volatile compared to VRME. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MG.Check VRME's competition here
MG vs CIGL Comparison May 2026
MG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MG stands at 549.8M. In comparison, CIGL has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MG is priced at $17.66, while CIGL trades at $1.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MG currently has a P/E ratio of 24.69, whereas CIGL's P/E ratio is -13.27. In terms of profitability, MG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CIGL's ROE of -35.79%. Regarding short-term risk, MG is less volatile compared to CIGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MG.Check CIGL's competition here
MG vs BKYI Comparison May 2026
MG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MG stands at 549.8M. In comparison, BKYI has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MG is priced at $17.66, while BKYI trades at $4.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MG currently has a P/E ratio of 24.69, whereas BKYI's P/E ratio is -0.69. In terms of profitability, MG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BKYI's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, MG is less volatile compared to BKYI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MG.Check BKYI's competition here
MG vs IVDAW Comparison May 2026
MG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MG stands at 549.8M. In comparison, IVDAW has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MG is priced at $17.66, while IVDAW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MG currently has a P/E ratio of 24.69, whereas IVDAW's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, MG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IVDAW's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, MG is less volatile compared to IVDAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MG.Check IVDAW's competition here
MG vs IVDA Comparison May 2026
MG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MG stands at 549.8M. In comparison, IVDA has a market cap of 907.2K. Regarding current trading prices, MG is priced at $17.66, while IVDA trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MG currently has a P/E ratio of 24.69, whereas IVDA's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, MG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IVDA's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, MG is more volatile compared to IVDA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MG.Check IVDA's competition here
MG vs GFAIW Comparison May 2026
MG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MG stands at 549.8M. In comparison, GFAIW has a market cap of 749.8K. Regarding current trading prices, MG is priced at $17.66, while GFAIW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MG currently has a P/E ratio of 24.69, whereas GFAIW's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, MG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GFAIW's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MG is less volatile compared to GFAIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MG.Check GFAIW's competition here
MG vs LGMK Comparison May 2026
MG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MG stands at 549.8M. In comparison, LGMK has a market cap of 476.9K. Regarding current trading prices, MG is priced at $17.66, while LGMK trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MG currently has a P/E ratio of 24.69, whereas LGMK's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, MG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LGMK's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, MG is less volatile compared to LGMK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MG.Check LGMK's competition here
MG vs VRMEW Comparison May 2026
MG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MG stands at 549.8M. In comparison, VRMEW has a market cap of 172.8K. Regarding current trading prices, MG is priced at $17.66, while VRMEW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MG currently has a P/E ratio of 24.69, whereas VRMEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VRMEW's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, MG is less volatile compared to VRMEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MG.Check VRMEW's competition here
MG vs LOJN Comparison May 2026
MG plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MG stands at 549.8M. In comparison, LOJN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MG is priced at $17.66, while LOJN trades at $6.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MG currently has a P/E ratio of 24.69, whereas LOJN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LOJN's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MG is more volatile compared to LOJN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MG.Check LOJN's competition here