SR Bancorp, Inc. Common stock
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for SRBK
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for SRBK
SR Bancorp, Inc. Common stock (SRBK) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SRBK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Banks - Regional Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SRBK | $17.65 | -0.40% | 135.4M | 32.69 | $0.54 | +1.14% |
| USB-PA | $766.90 | +0.44% | 1.3T | 218.49 | $3.51 | +3.67% |
| HDB | $26.80 | +0.26% | 137.5B | 18.36 | $1.46 | +4.12% |
| MFG | $8.65 | +0.23% | 106.8B | 16.31 | $0.53 | +1.99% |
| ITUB | $9.17 | +0.11% | 101.1B | 11.61 | $0.79 | +6.63% |
| IBN | $28.04 | +1.12% | 100.2B | 17.63 | $1.59 | +0.92% |
| PNC | $223.00 | +0.85% | 90B | 13.45 | $16.59 | +3.02% |
| USB | $56.51 | +1.53% | 87.8B | 12.23 | $4.62 | +3.67% |
| LYG | $5.53 | +0.73% | 81.3B | 14.95 | $0.37 | +3.55% |
| USB-PP | $21.93 | -0.09% | 68.8B | 4.73 | $4.64 | +3.67% |
Stock Comparison
SRBK vs USB-PA Comparison April 2026
SRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRBK stands at 135.4M. In comparison, USB-PA has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, SRBK is priced at $17.65, while USB-PA trades at $766.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 32.69, whereas USB-PA's P/E ratio is 218.49. In terms of profitability, SRBK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to USB-PA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SRBK is more volatile compared to USB-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRBK.Check USB-PA's competition here
SRBK vs HDB Comparison April 2026
SRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRBK stands at 135.4M. In comparison, HDB has a market cap of 137.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SRBK is priced at $17.65, while HDB trades at $26.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 32.69, whereas HDB's P/E ratio is 18.36. In terms of profitability, SRBK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HDB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SRBK is less volatile compared to HDB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRBK.Check HDB's competition here
SRBK vs MFG Comparison April 2026
SRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRBK stands at 135.4M. In comparison, MFG has a market cap of 106.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SRBK is priced at $17.65, while MFG trades at $8.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 32.69, whereas MFG's P/E ratio is 16.31. In terms of profitability, SRBK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MFG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SRBK is less volatile compared to MFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRBK.Check MFG's competition here
SRBK vs ITUB Comparison April 2026
SRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRBK stands at 135.4M. In comparison, ITUB has a market cap of 101.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SRBK is priced at $17.65, while ITUB trades at $9.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 32.69, whereas ITUB's P/E ratio is 11.61. In terms of profitability, SRBK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ITUB's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SRBK is less volatile compared to ITUB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRBK.Check ITUB's competition here
SRBK vs IBN Comparison April 2026
SRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRBK stands at 135.4M. In comparison, IBN has a market cap of 100.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SRBK is priced at $17.65, while IBN trades at $28.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 32.69, whereas IBN's P/E ratio is 17.63. In terms of profitability, SRBK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to IBN's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SRBK is less volatile compared to IBN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRBK.Check IBN's competition here
SRBK vs PNC Comparison April 2026
SRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRBK stands at 135.4M. In comparison, PNC has a market cap of 90B. Regarding current trading prices, SRBK is priced at $17.65, while PNC trades at $223.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 32.69, whereas PNC's P/E ratio is 13.45. In terms of profitability, SRBK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PNC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SRBK is less volatile compared to PNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRBK.Check PNC's competition here
SRBK vs USB Comparison April 2026
SRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRBK stands at 135.4M. In comparison, USB has a market cap of 87.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SRBK is priced at $17.65, while USB trades at $56.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 32.69, whereas USB's P/E ratio is 12.23. In terms of profitability, SRBK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to USB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SRBK is less volatile compared to USB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRBK.Check USB's competition here
SRBK vs LYG Comparison April 2026
SRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRBK stands at 135.4M. In comparison, LYG has a market cap of 81.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SRBK is priced at $17.65, while LYG trades at $5.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 32.69, whereas LYG's P/E ratio is 14.95. In terms of profitability, SRBK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to LYG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SRBK is less volatile compared to LYG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRBK.Check LYG's competition here
SRBK vs USB-PP Comparison April 2026
SRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRBK stands at 135.4M. In comparison, USB-PP has a market cap of 68.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SRBK is priced at $17.65, while USB-PP trades at $21.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 32.69, whereas USB-PP's P/E ratio is 4.73. In terms of profitability, SRBK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to USB-PP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SRBK is more volatile compared to USB-PP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRBK.Check USB-PP's competition here
SRBK vs USB-PS Comparison April 2026
SRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRBK stands at 135.4M. In comparison, USB-PS has a market cap of 68B. Regarding current trading prices, SRBK is priced at $17.65, while USB-PS trades at $17.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 32.69, whereas USB-PS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SRBK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to USB-PS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SRBK is more volatile compared to USB-PS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRBK.Check USB-PS's competition here
SRBK vs USB-PH Comparison April 2026
SRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRBK stands at 135.4M. In comparison, USB-PH has a market cap of 67.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SRBK is priced at $17.65, while USB-PH trades at $18.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 32.69, whereas USB-PH's P/E ratio is 4.06. In terms of profitability, SRBK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to USB-PH's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SRBK is less volatile compared to USB-PH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRBK.Check USB-PH's competition here
SRBK vs TFC Comparison April 2026
SRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRBK stands at 135.4M. In comparison, TFC has a market cap of 62.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SRBK is priced at $17.65, while TFC trades at $50.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 32.69, whereas TFC's P/E ratio is 13.09. In terms of profitability, SRBK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TFC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SRBK is less volatile compared to TFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRBK.Check TFC's competition here
SRBK vs DB Comparison April 2026
SRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRBK stands at 135.4M. In comparison, DB has a market cap of 62.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SRBK is priced at $17.65, while DB trades at $32.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 32.69, whereas DB's P/E ratio is 9.10. In terms of profitability, SRBK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SRBK is less volatile compared to DB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRBK.Check DB's competition here
SRBK vs BSBR Comparison April 2026
SRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRBK stands at 135.4M. In comparison, BSBR has a market cap of 48.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SRBK is priced at $17.65, while BSBR trades at $6.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 32.69, whereas BSBR's P/E ratio is 20.19. In terms of profitability, SRBK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BSBR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SRBK is less volatile compared to BSBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRBK.Check BSBR's competition here
SRBK vs BBD Comparison April 2026
SRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRBK stands at 135.4M. In comparison, BBD has a market cap of 43.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SRBK is priced at $17.65, while BBD trades at $4.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 32.69, whereas BBD's P/E ratio is 9.75. In terms of profitability, SRBK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BBD's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SRBK is less volatile compared to BBD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRBK.Check BBD's competition here
SRBK vs HBANZ Comparison April 2026
SRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRBK stands at 135.4M. In comparison, HBANZ has a market cap of 42.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SRBK is priced at $17.65, while HBANZ trades at $20.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 32.69, whereas HBANZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SRBK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HBANZ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SRBK is more volatile compared to HBANZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRBK.Check HBANZ's competition here
SRBK vs BBDO Comparison April 2026
SRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRBK stands at 135.4M. In comparison, BBDO has a market cap of 38.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SRBK is priced at $17.65, while BBDO trades at $3.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 32.69, whereas BBDO's P/E ratio is 8.75. In terms of profitability, SRBK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BBDO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SRBK is less volatile compared to BBDO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRBK.Check BBDO's competition here
SRBK vs KB Comparison April 2026
SRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRBK stands at 135.4M. In comparison, KB has a market cap of 38.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SRBK is priced at $17.65, while KB trades at $109.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 32.69, whereas KB's P/E ratio is 10.59. In terms of profitability, SRBK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to KB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SRBK is less volatile compared to KB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRBK.Check KB's competition here
SRBK vs HBANL Comparison April 2026
SRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRBK stands at 135.4M. In comparison, HBANL has a market cap of 37.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SRBK is priced at $17.65, while HBANL trades at $25.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 32.69, whereas HBANL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SRBK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HBANL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SRBK is more volatile compared to HBANL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRBK.Check HBANL's competition here
SRBK vs SHG Comparison April 2026
SRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRBK stands at 135.4M. In comparison, SHG has a market cap of 33.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SRBK is priced at $17.65, while SHG trades at $67.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 32.69, whereas SHG's P/E ratio is 10.24. In terms of profitability, SRBK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SHG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SRBK is less volatile compared to SHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRBK.Check SHG's competition here
SRBK vs FITB Comparison April 2026
SRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRBK stands at 135.4M. In comparison, FITB has a market cap of 33.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SRBK is priced at $17.65, while FITB trades at $49.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 32.69, whereas FITB's P/E ratio is 14.12. In terms of profitability, SRBK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FITB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SRBK is less volatile compared to FITB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRBK.Check FITB's competition here
SRBK vs MTB Comparison April 2026
SRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRBK stands at 135.4M. In comparison, MTB has a market cap of 33B. Regarding current trading prices, SRBK is priced at $17.65, while MTB trades at $221.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 32.69, whereas MTB's P/E ratio is 12.79. In terms of profitability, SRBK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MTB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SRBK is less volatile compared to MTB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRBK.Check MTB's competition here
SRBK vs HBANM Comparison April 2026
SRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRBK stands at 135.4M. In comparison, HBANM has a market cap of 32.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SRBK is priced at $17.65, while HBANM trades at $21.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 32.69, whereas HBANM's P/E ratio is 27.97. In terms of profitability, SRBK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HBANM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SRBK is more volatile compared to HBANM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRBK.Check HBANM's competition here
SRBK vs BAP Comparison April 2026
SRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRBK stands at 135.4M. In comparison, BAP has a market cap of 28.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SRBK is priced at $17.65, while BAP trades at $361.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 32.69, whereas BAP's P/E ratio is 14.49. In terms of profitability, SRBK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BAP's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SRBK is less volatile compared to BAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRBK.Check BAP's competition here
SRBK vs TFC-PO Comparison April 2026
SRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRBK stands at 135.4M. In comparison, TFC-PO has a market cap of 27.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SRBK is priced at $17.65, while TFC-PO trades at $21.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 32.69, whereas TFC-PO's P/E ratio is 4.78. In terms of profitability, SRBK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TFC-PO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SRBK is less volatile compared to TFC-PO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRBK.Check TFC-PO's competition here
SRBK vs CFG Comparison April 2026
SRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRBK stands at 135.4M. In comparison, CFG has a market cap of 27.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SRBK is priced at $17.65, while CFG trades at $64.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 32.69, whereas CFG's P/E ratio is 16.48. In terms of profitability, SRBK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CFG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SRBK is less volatile compared to CFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRBK.Check CFG's competition here
SRBK vs KEY-PL Comparison April 2026
SRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRBK stands at 135.4M. In comparison, KEY-PL has a market cap of 27.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SRBK is priced at $17.65, while KEY-PL trades at $24.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 32.69, whereas KEY-PL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SRBK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to KEY-PL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SRBK is less volatile compared to KEY-PL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRBK.Check KEY-PL's competition here
SRBK vs HBANP Comparison April 2026
SRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRBK stands at 135.4M. In comparison, HBANP has a market cap of 25.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SRBK is priced at $17.65, while HBANP trades at $17.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 32.69, whereas HBANP's P/E ratio is 22.02. In terms of profitability, SRBK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HBANP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SRBK is more volatile compared to HBANP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRBK.Check HBANP's competition here
SRBK vs USB-PR Comparison April 2026
SRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRBK stands at 135.4M. In comparison, USB-PR has a market cap of 24.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SRBK is priced at $17.65, while USB-PR trades at $15.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 32.69, whereas USB-PR's P/E ratio is 3.44. In terms of profitability, SRBK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to USB-PR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SRBK is more volatile compared to USB-PR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRBK.Check USB-PR's competition here
SRBK vs TFC-PI Comparison April 2026
SRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRBK stands at 135.4M. In comparison, TFC-PI has a market cap of 24.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SRBK is priced at $17.65, while TFC-PI trades at $19.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 32.69, whereas TFC-PI's P/E ratio is 4.29. In terms of profitability, SRBK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TFC-PI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SRBK is more volatile compared to TFC-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRBK.Check TFC-PI's competition here
SRBK vs HBAN Comparison April 2026
SRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRBK stands at 135.4M. In comparison, HBAN has a market cap of 24.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SRBK is priced at $17.65, while HBAN trades at $16.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 32.69, whereas HBAN's P/E ratio is 11.96. In terms of profitability, SRBK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HBAN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SRBK is less volatile compared to HBAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRBK.Check HBAN's competition here
SRBK vs TFC-PR Comparison April 2026
SRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRBK stands at 135.4M. In comparison, TFC-PR has a market cap of 24.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SRBK is priced at $17.65, while TFC-PR trades at $18.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 32.69, whereas TFC-PR's P/E ratio is 4.21. In terms of profitability, SRBK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TFC-PR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SRBK is more volatile compared to TFC-PR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRBK.Check TFC-PR's competition here
SRBK vs RF Comparison April 2026
SRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRBK stands at 135.4M. In comparison, RF has a market cap of 24B. Regarding current trading prices, SRBK is priced at $17.65, while RF trades at $27.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 32.69, whereas RF's P/E ratio is 12.10. In terms of profitability, SRBK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SRBK is less volatile compared to RF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRBK.Check RF's competition here
SRBK vs FCNCA Comparison April 2026
SRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRBK stands at 135.4M. In comparison, FCNCA has a market cap of 23.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SRBK is priced at $17.65, while FCNCA trades at $2,000.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 32.69, whereas FCNCA's P/E ratio is 12.11. In terms of profitability, SRBK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FCNCA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SRBK is less volatile compared to FCNCA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRBK.Check FCNCA's competition here
SRBK vs KEY Comparison April 2026
SRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRBK stands at 135.4M. In comparison, KEY has a market cap of 23.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SRBK is priced at $17.65, while KEY trades at $21.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 32.69, whereas KEY's P/E ratio is 14.28. In terms of profitability, SRBK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to KEY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SRBK is less volatile compared to KEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRBK.Check KEY's competition here
SRBK vs FITBM Comparison April 2026
SRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRBK stands at 135.4M. In comparison, FITBM has a market cap of 23.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SRBK is priced at $17.65, while FITBM trades at $26.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 32.69, whereas FITBM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SRBK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FITBM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SRBK is more volatile compared to FITBM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRBK.Check FITBM's competition here
SRBK vs USB-PQ Comparison April 2026
SRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRBK stands at 135.4M. In comparison, USB-PQ has a market cap of 23.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SRBK is priced at $17.65, while USB-PQ trades at $15.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 32.69, whereas USB-PQ's P/E ratio is 3.25. In terms of profitability, SRBK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to USB-PQ's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SRBK is more volatile compared to USB-PQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRBK.Check USB-PQ's competition here
SRBK vs RF-PF Comparison April 2026
SRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRBK stands at 135.4M. In comparison, RF-PF has a market cap of 22.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SRBK is priced at $17.65, while RF-PF trades at $25.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 32.69, whereas RF-PF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SRBK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RF-PF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SRBK is more volatile compared to RF-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRBK.Check RF-PF's competition here
SRBK vs FCNCN Comparison April 2026
SRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRBK stands at 135.4M. In comparison, FCNCN has a market cap of 22.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SRBK is priced at $17.65, while FCNCN trades at $25.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 32.69, whereas FCNCN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SRBK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FCNCN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SRBK is more volatile compared to FCNCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRBK.Check FCNCN's competition here
SRBK vs KEY-PJ Comparison April 2026
SRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRBK stands at 135.4M. In comparison, KEY-PJ has a market cap of 22B. Regarding current trading prices, SRBK is priced at $17.65, while KEY-PJ trades at $21.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 32.69, whereas KEY-PJ's P/E ratio is 8.59. In terms of profitability, SRBK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to KEY-PJ's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SRBK is more volatile compared to KEY-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRBK.Check KEY-PJ's competition here
SRBK vs RF-PC Comparison April 2026
SRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRBK stands at 135.4M. In comparison, RF-PC has a market cap of 21.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SRBK is priced at $17.65, while RF-PC trades at $24.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 32.69, whereas RF-PC's P/E ratio is 10.16. In terms of profitability, SRBK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RF-PC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SRBK is more volatile compared to RF-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRBK.Check RF-PC's competition here
SRBK vs CIB Comparison April 2026
SRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRBK stands at 135.4M. In comparison, CIB has a market cap of 20.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SRBK is priced at $17.65, while CIB trades at $77.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 32.69, whereas CIB's P/E ratio is 10.04. In terms of profitability, SRBK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CIB's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SRBK is less volatile compared to CIB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRBK.Check CIB's competition here
SRBK vs KEY-PI Comparison April 2026
SRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRBK stands at 135.4M. In comparison, KEY-PI has a market cap of 20.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SRBK is priced at $17.65, while KEY-PI trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 32.69, whereas KEY-PI's P/E ratio is 10.12. In terms of profitability, SRBK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to KEY-PI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SRBK is more volatile compared to KEY-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRBK.Check KEY-PI's competition here
SRBK vs BCH Comparison April 2026
SRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRBK stands at 135.4M. In comparison, BCH has a market cap of 19.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SRBK is priced at $17.65, while BCH trades at $38.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 32.69, whereas BCH's P/E ratio is 15.10. In terms of profitability, SRBK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BCH's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SRBK is less volatile compared to BCH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRBK.Check BCH's competition here
SRBK vs WF Comparison April 2026
SRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRBK stands at 135.4M. In comparison, WF has a market cap of 17.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SRBK is priced at $17.65, while WF trades at $71.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 32.69, whereas WF's P/E ratio is 8.83. In terms of profitability, SRBK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to WF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SRBK is less volatile compared to WF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRBK.Check WF's competition here
SRBK vs KEY-PK Comparison April 2026
SRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRBK stands at 135.4M. In comparison, KEY-PK has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, SRBK is priced at $17.65, while KEY-PK trades at $21.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 32.69, whereas KEY-PK's P/E ratio is 14.85. In terms of profitability, SRBK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to KEY-PK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SRBK is less volatile compared to KEY-PK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRBK.Check KEY-PK's competition here
SRBK vs BSAC Comparison April 2026
SRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRBK stands at 135.4M. In comparison, BSAC has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SRBK is priced at $17.65, while BSAC trades at $35.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 32.69, whereas BSAC's P/E ratio is 14.65. In terms of profitability, SRBK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BSAC's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SRBK is less volatile compared to BSAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRBK.Check BSAC's competition here
SRBK vs FITBI Comparison April 2026
SRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRBK stands at 135.4M. In comparison, FITBI has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SRBK is priced at $17.65, while FITBI trades at $25.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 32.69, whereas FITBI's P/E ratio is 7.28. In terms of profitability, SRBK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FITBI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SRBK is more volatile compared to FITBI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRBK.Check FITBI's competition here
SRBK vs FITBP Comparison April 2026
SRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRBK stands at 135.4M. In comparison, FITBP has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SRBK is priced at $17.65, while FITBP trades at $23.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 32.69, whereas FITBP's P/E ratio is 6.84. In terms of profitability, SRBK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FITBP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SRBK is more volatile compared to FITBP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRBK.Check FITBP's competition here
SRBK vs RF-PE Comparison April 2026
SRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRBK stands at 135.4M. In comparison, RF-PE has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, SRBK is priced at $17.65, while RF-PE trades at $16.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 32.69, whereas RF-PE's P/E ratio is 6.96. In terms of profitability, SRBK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RF-PE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SRBK is more volatile compared to RF-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRBK.Check RF-PE's competition here
SRBK vs CFG-PD Comparison April 2026
SRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRBK stands at 135.4M. In comparison, CFG-PD has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SRBK is priced at $17.65, while CFG-PD trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 32.69, whereas CFG-PD's P/E ratio is 5.29. In terms of profitability, SRBK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CFG-PD's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SRBK is more volatile compared to CFG-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRBK.Check CFG-PD's competition here
SRBK vs VLYPN Comparison April 2026
SRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRBK stands at 135.4M. In comparison, VLYPN has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SRBK is priced at $17.65, while VLYPN trades at $25.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 32.69, whereas VLYPN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SRBK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to VLYPN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SRBK is more volatile compared to VLYPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRBK.Check VLYPN's competition here
SRBK vs FITBO Comparison April 2026
SRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRBK stands at 135.4M. In comparison, FITBO has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SRBK is priced at $17.65, while FITBO trades at $19.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 32.69, whereas FITBO's P/E ratio is 5.56. In terms of profitability, SRBK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FITBO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SRBK is less volatile compared to FITBO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRBK.Check FITBO's competition here
SRBK vs FHN-PC Comparison April 2026
SRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRBK stands at 135.4M. In comparison, FHN-PC has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SRBK is priced at $17.65, while FHN-PC trades at $25.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 32.69, whereas FHN-PC's P/E ratio is 15.10. In terms of profitability, SRBK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FHN-PC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SRBK is more volatile compared to FHN-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRBK.Check FHN-PC's competition here
SRBK vs FHN-PB Comparison April 2026
SRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRBK stands at 135.4M. In comparison, FHN-PB has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SRBK is priced at $17.65, while FHN-PB trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 32.69, whereas FHN-PB's P/E ratio is 14.88. In terms of profitability, SRBK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FHN-PB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SRBK is more volatile compared to FHN-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRBK.Check FHN-PB's competition here
SRBK vs FHN-PE Comparison April 2026
SRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRBK stands at 135.4M. In comparison, FHN-PE has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SRBK is priced at $17.65, while FHN-PE trades at $24.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 32.69, whereas FHN-PE's P/E ratio is 14.58. In terms of profitability, SRBK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FHN-PE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SRBK is more volatile compared to FHN-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRBK.Check FHN-PE's competition here
SRBK vs CFG-PH Comparison April 2026
SRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRBK stands at 135.4M. In comparison, CFG-PH has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SRBK is priced at $17.65, while CFG-PH trades at $25.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 32.69, whereas CFG-PH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SRBK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CFG-PH's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SRBK is more volatile compared to CFG-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRBK.Check CFG-PH's competition here
SRBK vs FHN Comparison April 2026
SRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRBK stands at 135.4M. In comparison, FHN has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SRBK is priced at $17.65, while FHN trades at $24.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 32.69, whereas FHN's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, SRBK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FHN's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SRBK is less volatile compared to FHN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRBK.Check FHN's competition here
SRBK vs WBS Comparison April 2026
SRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRBK stands at 135.4M. In comparison, WBS has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SRBK is priced at $17.65, while WBS trades at $72.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 32.69, whereas WBS's P/E ratio is 12.21. In terms of profitability, SRBK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to WBS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SRBK is more volatile compared to WBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRBK.Check WBS's competition here
SRBK vs CMA Comparison April 2026
SRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRBK stands at 135.4M. In comparison, CMA has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SRBK is priced at $17.65, while CMA trades at $88.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 32.69, whereas CMA's P/E ratio is 16.79. In terms of profitability, SRBK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CMA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SRBK is less volatile compared to CMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRBK.Check CMA's competition here
SRBK vs WTFC Comparison April 2026
SRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRBK stands at 135.4M. In comparison, WTFC has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SRBK is priced at $17.65, while WTFC trades at $147.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 32.69, whereas WTFC's P/E ratio is 12.91. In terms of profitability, SRBK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to WTFC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SRBK is less volatile compared to WTFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRBK.Check WTFC's competition here
SRBK vs SSB Comparison April 2026
SRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRBK stands at 135.4M. In comparison, SSB has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SRBK is priced at $17.65, while SSB trades at $97.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 32.69, whereas SSB's P/E ratio is 12.43. In terms of profitability, SRBK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SSB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SRBK is less volatile compared to SSB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRBK.Check SSB's competition here
SRBK vs BPOP Comparison April 2026
SRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRBK stands at 135.4M. In comparison, BPOP has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SRBK is priced at $17.65, while BPOP trades at $146.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 32.69, whereas BPOP's P/E ratio is 11.90. In terms of profitability, SRBK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BPOP's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SRBK is less volatile compared to BPOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRBK.Check BPOP's competition here
SRBK vs ONB Comparison April 2026
SRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRBK stands at 135.4M. In comparison, ONB has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SRBK is priced at $17.65, while ONB trades at $23.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 32.69, whereas ONB's P/E ratio is 13.19. In terms of profitability, SRBK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ONB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SRBK is less volatile compared to ONB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRBK.Check ONB's competition here
SRBK vs UMBF Comparison April 2026
SRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRBK stands at 135.4M. In comparison, UMBF has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SRBK is priced at $17.65, while UMBF trades at $120.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 32.69, whereas UMBF's P/E ratio is 12.97. In terms of profitability, SRBK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to UMBF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SRBK is less volatile compared to UMBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRBK.Check UMBF's competition here
SRBK vs ONBPO Comparison April 2026
SRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRBK stands at 135.4M. In comparison, ONBPO has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SRBK is priced at $17.65, while ONBPO trades at $25.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 32.69, whereas ONBPO's P/E ratio is 28.14. In terms of profitability, SRBK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ONBPO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SRBK is more volatile compared to ONBPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRBK.Check ONBPO's competition here
SRBK vs ZION Comparison April 2026
SRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRBK stands at 135.4M. In comparison, ZION has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SRBK is priced at $17.65, while ZION trades at $61.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 32.69, whereas ZION's P/E ratio is 10.24. In terms of profitability, SRBK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ZION's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SRBK is less volatile compared to ZION. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRBK.Check ZION's competition here
SRBK vs ONBPP Comparison April 2026
SRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRBK stands at 135.4M. In comparison, ONBPP has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SRBK is priced at $17.65, while ONBPP trades at $24.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 32.69, whereas ONBPP's P/E ratio is 27.99. In terms of profitability, SRBK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ONBPP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SRBK is more volatile compared to ONBPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRBK.Check ONBPP's competition here
SRBK vs CFR Comparison April 2026
SRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRBK stands at 135.4M. In comparison, CFR has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, SRBK is priced at $17.65, while CFR trades at $143.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 32.69, whereas CFR's P/E ratio is 14.40. In terms of profitability, SRBK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CFR's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SRBK is less volatile compared to CFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRBK.Check CFR's competition here
SRBK vs FHN-PF Comparison April 2026
SRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRBK stands at 135.4M. In comparison, FHN-PF has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SRBK is priced at $17.65, while FHN-PF trades at $17.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 32.69, whereas FHN-PF's P/E ratio is 10.54. In terms of profitability, SRBK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FHN-PF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SRBK is more volatile compared to FHN-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRBK.Check FHN-PF's competition here
SRBK vs FHN-PD Comparison April 2026
SRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRBK stands at 135.4M. In comparison, FHN-PD has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SRBK is priced at $17.65, while FHN-PD trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 32.69, whereas FHN-PD's P/E ratio is 14.88. In terms of profitability, SRBK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FHN-PD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SRBK is more volatile compared to FHN-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRBK.Check FHN-PD's competition here
SRBK vs WAL Comparison April 2026
SRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRBK stands at 135.4M. In comparison, WAL has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SRBK is priced at $17.65, while WAL trades at $77.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 32.69, whereas WAL's P/E ratio is 8.64. In terms of profitability, SRBK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to WAL's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SRBK is less volatile compared to WAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRBK.Check WAL's competition here
SRBK vs CFG-PE Comparison April 2026
SRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRBK stands at 135.4M. In comparison, CFG-PE has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SRBK is priced at $17.65, while CFG-PE trades at $18.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 32.69, whereas CFG-PE's P/E ratio is 4.02. In terms of profitability, SRBK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CFG-PE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SRBK is more volatile compared to CFG-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRBK.Check CFG-PE's competition here
SRBK vs BOKF Comparison April 2026
SRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRBK stands at 135.4M. In comparison, BOKF has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SRBK is priced at $17.65, while BOKF trades at $135.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 32.69, whereas BOKF's P/E ratio is 14.76. In terms of profitability, SRBK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BOKF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SRBK is less volatile compared to BOKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRBK.Check BOKF's competition here
SRBK vs CHYM Comparison April 2026
SRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRBK stands at 135.4M. In comparison, CHYM has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SRBK is priced at $17.65, while CHYM trades at $21.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 32.69, whereas CHYM's P/E ratio is -4.98. In terms of profitability, SRBK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CHYM's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, SRBK is less volatile compared to CHYM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRBK.Check CHYM's competition here
SRBK vs GGAL Comparison April 2026
SRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRBK stands at 135.4M. In comparison, GGAL has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SRBK is priced at $17.65, while GGAL trades at $48.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 32.69, whereas GGAL's P/E ratio is 55.51. In terms of profitability, SRBK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GGAL's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SRBK is less volatile compared to GGAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRBK.Check GGAL's competition here
SRBK vs CADE Comparison April 2026
SRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRBK stands at 135.4M. In comparison, CADE has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SRBK is priced at $17.65, while CADE trades at $42.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 32.69, whereas CADE's P/E ratio is 15.20. In terms of profitability, SRBK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CADE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SRBK is less volatile compared to CADE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRBK.Check CADE's competition here
SRBK vs CBSH Comparison April 2026
SRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRBK stands at 135.4M. In comparison, CBSH has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SRBK is priced at $17.65, while CBSH trades at $50.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 32.69, whereas CBSH's P/E ratio is 12.60. In terms of profitability, SRBK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CBSH's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SRBK is less volatile compared to CBSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRBK.Check CBSH's competition here
SRBK vs BSMX Comparison April 2026
SRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRBK stands at 135.4M. In comparison, BSMX has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SRBK is priced at $17.65, while BSMX trades at $5.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 32.69, whereas BSMX's P/E ratio is 4.88. In terms of profitability, SRBK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BSMX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SRBK is less volatile compared to BSMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRBK.Check BSMX's competition here
SRBK vs VLY Comparison April 2026
SRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRBK stands at 135.4M. In comparison, VLY has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SRBK is priced at $17.65, while VLY trades at $13.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 32.69, whereas VLY's P/E ratio is 12.98. In terms of profitability, SRBK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to VLY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SRBK is less volatile compared to VLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRBK.Check VLY's competition here
SRBK vs PNFP Comparison April 2026
SRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRBK stands at 135.4M. In comparison, PNFP has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SRBK is priced at $17.65, while PNFP trades at $92.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 32.69, whereas PNFP's P/E ratio is 11.85. In terms of profitability, SRBK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PNFP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SRBK is less volatile compared to PNFP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRBK.Check PNFP's competition here
SRBK vs PB Comparison April 2026
SRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRBK stands at 135.4M. In comparison, PB has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, SRBK is priced at $17.65, while PB trades at $69.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 32.69, whereas PB's P/E ratio is 12.10. In terms of profitability, SRBK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PB's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SRBK is less volatile compared to PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRBK.Check PB's competition here
SRBK vs SNV Comparison April 2026
SRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRBK stands at 135.4M. In comparison, SNV has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SRBK is priced at $17.65, while SNV trades at $50.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 32.69, whereas SNV's P/E ratio is 9.37. In terms of profitability, SRBK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SNV's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SRBK is less volatile compared to SNV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRBK.Check SNV's competition here
SRBK vs COLB Comparison April 2026
SRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRBK stands at 135.4M. In comparison, COLB has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SRBK is priced at $17.65, while COLB trades at $29.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 32.69, whereas COLB's P/E ratio is 12.68. In terms of profitability, SRBK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to COLB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SRBK is less volatile compared to COLB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRBK.Check COLB's competition here
SRBK vs SNV-PD Comparison April 2026
SRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRBK stands at 135.4M. In comparison, SNV-PD has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SRBK is priced at $17.65, while SNV-PD trades at $25.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 32.69, whereas SNV-PD's P/E ratio is 5.25. In terms of profitability, SRBK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SNV-PD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SRBK is more volatile compared to SNV-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRBK.Check SNV-PD's competition here
SRBK vs CUBI-PE Comparison April 2026
SRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRBK stands at 135.4M. In comparison, CUBI-PE has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SRBK is priced at $17.65, while CUBI-PE trades at $205.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 32.69, whereas CUBI-PE's P/E ratio is 20.53. In terms of profitability, SRBK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CUBI-PE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SRBK is less volatile compared to CUBI-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRBK.Check CUBI-PE's competition here
SRBK vs FNB Comparison April 2026
SRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRBK stands at 135.4M. In comparison, FNB has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SRBK is priced at $17.65, while FNB trades at $17.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 32.69, whereas FNB's P/E ratio is 11.40. In terms of profitability, SRBK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FNB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SRBK is less volatile compared to FNB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRBK.Check FNB's competition here
SRBK vs GBCI Comparison April 2026
SRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRBK stands at 135.4M. In comparison, GBCI has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SRBK is priced at $17.65, while GBCI trades at $48.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 32.69, whereas GBCI's P/E ratio is 24.45. In terms of profitability, SRBK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GBCI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SRBK is less volatile compared to GBCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRBK.Check GBCI's competition here
SRBK vs UBSI Comparison April 2026
SRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRBK stands at 135.4M. In comparison, UBSI has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SRBK is priced at $17.65, while UBSI trades at $43.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 32.69, whereas UBSI's P/E ratio is 13.45. In terms of profitability, SRBK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to UBSI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SRBK is less volatile compared to UBSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRBK.Check UBSI's competition here
SRBK vs CBC Comparison April 2026
SRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRBK stands at 135.4M. In comparison, CBC has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SRBK is priced at $17.65, while CBC trades at $24.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 32.69, whereas CBC's P/E ratio is 14.13. In terms of profitability, SRBK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CBC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SRBK is less volatile compared to CBC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRBK.Check CBC's competition here
SRBK vs FLG Comparison April 2026
SRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRBK stands at 135.4M. In comparison, FLG has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SRBK is priced at $17.65, while FLG trades at $14.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 32.69, whereas FLG's P/E ratio is -28.12. In terms of profitability, SRBK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FLG's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SRBK is less volatile compared to FLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRBK.Check FLG's competition here
SRBK vs HOMB Comparison April 2026
SRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRBK stands at 135.4M. In comparison, HOMB has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SRBK is priced at $17.65, while HOMB trades at $28.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 32.69, whereas HOMB's P/E ratio is 11.71. In terms of profitability, SRBK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HOMB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SRBK is less volatile compared to HOMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRBK.Check HOMB's competition here
SRBK vs ABCB Comparison April 2026
SRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRBK stands at 135.4M. In comparison, ABCB has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SRBK is priced at $17.65, while ABCB trades at $83.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 32.69, whereas ABCB's P/E ratio is 13.90. In terms of profitability, SRBK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ABCB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SRBK is less volatile compared to ABCB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRBK.Check ABCB's competition here
SRBK vs IFS Comparison April 2026
SRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRBK stands at 135.4M. In comparison, IFS has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SRBK is priced at $17.65, while IFS trades at $51.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 32.69, whereas IFS's P/E ratio is 10.63. In terms of profitability, SRBK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to IFS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SRBK is less volatile compared to IFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRBK.Check IFS's competition here
SRBK vs HWC Comparison April 2026
SRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRBK stands at 135.4M. In comparison, HWC has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SRBK is priced at $17.65, while HWC trades at $67.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 32.69, whereas HWC's P/E ratio is 11.92. In terms of profitability, SRBK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HWC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SRBK is less volatile compared to HWC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRBK.Check HWC's competition here
SRBK vs AVAL Comparison April 2026
SRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRBK stands at 135.4M. In comparison, AVAL has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SRBK is priced at $17.65, while AVAL trades at $4.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 32.69, whereas AVAL's P/E ratio is 12.11. In terms of profitability, SRBK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AVAL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SRBK is less volatile compared to AVAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRBK.Check AVAL's competition here
SRBK vs AUB Comparison April 2026
SRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRBK stands at 135.4M. In comparison, AUB has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SRBK is priced at $17.65, while AUB trades at $38.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 32.69, whereas AUB's P/E ratio is 18.88. In terms of profitability, SRBK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AUB's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SRBK is less volatile compared to AUB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRBK.Check AUB's competition here
SRBK vs VLYPP Comparison April 2026
SRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRBK stands at 135.4M. In comparison, VLYPP has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SRBK is priced at $17.65, while VLYPP trades at $25.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 32.69, whereas VLYPP's P/E ratio is 22.59. In terms of profitability, SRBK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to VLYPP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SRBK is more volatile compared to VLYPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRBK.Check VLYPP's competition here
SRBK vs VLYPO Comparison April 2026
SRBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRBK stands at 135.4M. In comparison, VLYPO has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SRBK is priced at $17.65, while VLYPO trades at $24.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRBK currently has a P/E ratio of 32.69, whereas VLYPO's P/E ratio is 22.32. In terms of profitability, SRBK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to VLYPO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SRBK is more volatile compared to VLYPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRBK.Check VLYPO's competition here