Selina Hospitality PLC
Selina Hospitality PLC SLNAW Peers
See (SLNAW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Gambling, Resorts & Casinos Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SLNAW | $0.01 | -42.16% | 526.4K | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| FLUT | $285.76 | +0.00% | 50.3B | 97.48 | $2.92 | N/A |
| LVS | $43.51 | +0.00% | 33.5B | 26.48 | $1.79 | +1.90% |
| DKNG | $42.89 | +0.00% | 20.8B | -51.21 | -$0.82 | N/A |
| WYNN | $93.67 | +0.00% | 10.7B | 27.26 | $3.74 | +0.98% |
| MGM | $34.39 | +0.00% | 10B | 16.46 | $2.24 | N/A |
| LNW | $96.26 | +0.00% | 8.1B | 25.66 | $3.74 | N/A |
| CHDN | $101.00 | +0.00% | 7.5B | 18.54 | $5.62 | +0.39% |
| BYD | $78.23 | +0.00% | 6.5B | 12.98 | $6.20 | +0.87% |
| CZR | $28.39 | +0.00% | 6.2B | -26.92 | -$1.10 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
SLNAW vs FLUT Comparison
SLNAW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLNAW stands at 526.4K. In comparison, FLUT has a market cap of 50.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SLNAW is priced at $0.01, while FLUT trades at $285.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLNAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLUT's P/E ratio is 97.48. In terms of profitability, SLNAW's ROE is +0.81%, compared to FLUT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SLNAW is more volatile compared to FLUT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLNAW.
SLNAW vs LVS Comparison
SLNAW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLNAW stands at 526.4K. In comparison, LVS has a market cap of 33.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SLNAW is priced at $0.01, while LVS trades at $43.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLNAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LVS's P/E ratio is 26.48. In terms of profitability, SLNAW's ROE is +0.81%, compared to LVS's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, SLNAW is more volatile compared to LVS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLNAW.
SLNAW vs DKNG Comparison
SLNAW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLNAW stands at 526.4K. In comparison, DKNG has a market cap of 20.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SLNAW is priced at $0.01, while DKNG trades at $42.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLNAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DKNG's P/E ratio is -51.21. In terms of profitability, SLNAW's ROE is +0.81%, compared to DKNG's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, SLNAW is more volatile compared to DKNG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLNAW.
SLNAW vs WYNN Comparison
SLNAW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLNAW stands at 526.4K. In comparison, WYNN has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SLNAW is priced at $0.01, while WYNN trades at $93.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLNAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WYNN's P/E ratio is 27.26. In terms of profitability, SLNAW's ROE is +0.81%, compared to WYNN's ROE of -1.76%. Regarding short-term risk, SLNAW is more volatile compared to WYNN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLNAW.
SLNAW vs MGM Comparison
SLNAW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLNAW stands at 526.4K. In comparison, MGM has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, SLNAW is priced at $0.01, while MGM trades at $34.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLNAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MGM's P/E ratio is 16.46. In terms of profitability, SLNAW's ROE is +0.81%, compared to MGM's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SLNAW is more volatile compared to MGM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLNAW.
SLNAW vs LNW Comparison
SLNAW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLNAW stands at 526.4K. In comparison, LNW has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SLNAW is priced at $0.01, while LNW trades at $96.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLNAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LNW's P/E ratio is 25.66. In terms of profitability, SLNAW's ROE is +0.81%, compared to LNW's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, SLNAW is more volatile compared to LNW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLNAW.
SLNAW vs CHDN Comparison
SLNAW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLNAW stands at 526.4K. In comparison, CHDN has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SLNAW is priced at $0.01, while CHDN trades at $101.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLNAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHDN's P/E ratio is 18.54. In terms of profitability, SLNAW's ROE is +0.81%, compared to CHDN's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, SLNAW is more volatile compared to CHDN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLNAW.
SLNAW vs BYD Comparison
SLNAW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLNAW stands at 526.4K. In comparison, BYD has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SLNAW is priced at $0.01, while BYD trades at $78.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLNAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BYD's P/E ratio is 12.98. In terms of profitability, SLNAW's ROE is +0.81%, compared to BYD's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, SLNAW is more volatile compared to BYD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLNAW.
SLNAW vs CZR Comparison
SLNAW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLNAW stands at 526.4K. In comparison, CZR has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SLNAW is priced at $0.01, while CZR trades at $28.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLNAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CZR's P/E ratio is -26.92. In terms of profitability, SLNAW's ROE is +0.81%, compared to CZR's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SLNAW is more volatile compared to CZR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLNAW.
SLNAW vs MTN Comparison
SLNAW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLNAW stands at 526.4K. In comparison, MTN has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, SLNAW is priced at $0.01, while MTN trades at $157.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLNAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MTN's P/E ratio is 20.53. In terms of profitability, SLNAW's ROE is +0.81%, compared to MTN's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, SLNAW is more volatile compared to MTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLNAW.
SLNAW vs SGHC Comparison
SLNAW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLNAW stands at 526.4K. In comparison, SGHC has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SLNAW is priced at $0.01, while SGHC trades at $10.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLNAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SGHC's P/E ratio is 41.94. In terms of profitability, SLNAW's ROE is +0.81%, compared to SGHC's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SLNAW is more volatile compared to SGHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLNAW.
SLNAW vs SGMS Comparison
SLNAW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLNAW stands at 526.4K. In comparison, SGMS has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SLNAW is priced at $0.01, while SGMS trades at $58.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLNAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SGMS's P/E ratio is 30.71. In terms of profitability, SLNAW's ROE is +0.81%, compared to SGMS's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, SLNAW is more volatile compared to SGMS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLNAW.
SLNAW vs RSI Comparison
SLNAW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLNAW stands at 526.4K. In comparison, RSI has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SLNAW is priced at $0.01, while RSI trades at $14.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLNAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RSI's P/E ratio is 165.33. In terms of profitability, SLNAW's ROE is +0.81%, compared to RSI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SLNAW is more volatile compared to RSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLNAW.
SLNAW vs HGV Comparison
SLNAW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLNAW stands at 526.4K. In comparison, HGV has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, SLNAW is priced at $0.01, while HGV trades at $41.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLNAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HGV's P/E ratio is 134.75. In terms of profitability, SLNAW's ROE is +0.81%, compared to HGV's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SLNAW is more volatile compared to HGV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLNAW.
SLNAW vs IGT Comparison
SLNAW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLNAW stands at 526.4K. In comparison, IGT has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SLNAW is priced at $0.01, while IGT trades at $15.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLNAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IGT's P/E ratio is 148.14. In terms of profitability, SLNAW's ROE is +0.81%, compared to IGT's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SLNAW is more volatile compared to IGT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLNAW.
SLNAW vs RRR Comparison
SLNAW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLNAW stands at 526.4K. In comparison, RRR has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SLNAW is priced at $0.01, while RRR trades at $52.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLNAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RRR's P/E ratio is 20.58. In terms of profitability, SLNAW's ROE is +0.81%, compared to RRR's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, SLNAW is more volatile compared to RRR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLNAW.
SLNAW vs PENN Comparison
SLNAW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLNAW stands at 526.4K. In comparison, PENN has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SLNAW is priced at $0.01, while PENN trades at $17.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLNAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PENN's P/E ratio is -29.90. In terms of profitability, SLNAW's ROE is +0.81%, compared to PENN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SLNAW is more volatile compared to PENN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLNAW.
SLNAW vs VAC Comparison
SLNAW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLNAW stands at 526.4K. In comparison, VAC has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SLNAW is priced at $0.01, while VAC trades at $72.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLNAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VAC's P/E ratio is 13.01. In terms of profitability, SLNAW's ROE is +0.81%, compared to VAC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SLNAW is more volatile compared to VAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLNAW.
SLNAW vs PLYA Comparison
SLNAW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLNAW stands at 526.4K. In comparison, PLYA has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SLNAW is priced at $0.01, while PLYA trades at $13.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLNAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PLYA's P/E ratio is 26.43. In terms of profitability, SLNAW's ROE is +0.81%, compared to PLYA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SLNAW is more volatile compared to PLYA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLNAW.
SLNAW vs MCRI Comparison
SLNAW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLNAW stands at 526.4K. In comparison, MCRI has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SLNAW is priced at $0.01, while MCRI trades at $86.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLNAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MCRI's P/E ratio is 22.44. In terms of profitability, SLNAW's ROE is +0.81%, compared to MCRI's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SLNAW is more volatile compared to MCRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLNAW.
SLNAW vs EVRI Comparison
SLNAW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLNAW stands at 526.4K. In comparison, EVRI has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SLNAW is priced at $0.01, while EVRI trades at $14.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLNAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EVRI's P/E ratio is 89.00. In terms of profitability, SLNAW's ROE is +0.81%, compared to EVRI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SLNAW is more volatile compared to EVRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLNAW.
SLNAW vs MLCO Comparison
SLNAW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLNAW stands at 526.4K. In comparison, MLCO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SLNAW is priced at $0.01, while MLCO trades at $7.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLNAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MLCO's P/E ratio is 57.57. In terms of profitability, SLNAW's ROE is +0.81%, compared to MLCO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SLNAW is more volatile compared to MLCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLNAW.
SLNAW vs ACEL Comparison
SLNAW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLNAW stands at 526.4K. In comparison, ACEL has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, SLNAW is priced at $0.01, while ACEL trades at $11.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLNAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ACEL's P/E ratio is 24.52. In terms of profitability, SLNAW's ROE is +0.81%, compared to ACEL's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SLNAW is more volatile compared to ACEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLNAW.
SLNAW vs BVH Comparison
SLNAW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLNAW stands at 526.4K. In comparison, BVH has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, SLNAW is priced at $0.01, while BVH trades at $75.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLNAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BVH's P/E ratio is 20.05. In terms of profitability, SLNAW's ROE is +0.81%, compared to BVH's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SLNAW is more volatile compared to BVH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLNAW.
SLNAW vs NGMS Comparison
SLNAW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLNAW stands at 526.4K. In comparison, NGMS has a market cap of 998.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SLNAW is priced at $0.01, while NGMS trades at $29.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLNAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NGMS's P/E ratio is -81.81. In terms of profitability, SLNAW's ROE is +0.81%, compared to NGMS's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SLNAW is more volatile compared to NGMS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLNAW.
SLNAW vs GDEN Comparison
SLNAW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLNAW stands at 526.4K. In comparison, GDEN has a market cap of 802.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SLNAW is priced at $0.01, while GDEN trades at $29.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLNAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GDEN's P/E ratio is 70.58. In terms of profitability, SLNAW's ROE is +0.81%, compared to GDEN's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SLNAW is more volatile compared to GDEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLNAW.
SLNAW vs TPGH-UN Comparison
SLNAW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLNAW stands at 526.4K. In comparison, TPGH-UN has a market cap of 580.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SLNAW is priced at $0.01, while TPGH-UN trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLNAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TPGH-UN's P/E ratio is -1000.00. In terms of profitability, SLNAW's ROE is +0.81%, compared to TPGH-UN's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SLNAW is more volatile compared to TPGH-UN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLNAW.
SLNAW vs SBET Comparison
SLNAW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLNAW stands at 526.4K. In comparison, SBET has a market cap of 569.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SLNAW is priced at $0.01, while SBET trades at $9.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLNAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SBET's P/E ratio is 0.20. In terms of profitability, SLNAW's ROE is +0.81%, compared to SBET's ROE of -1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, SLNAW is more volatile compared to SBET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLNAW.
SLNAW vs AGS Comparison
SLNAW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLNAW stands at 526.4K. In comparison, AGS has a market cap of 518.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SLNAW is priced at $0.01, while AGS trades at $12.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLNAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AGS's P/E ratio is 10.77. In terms of profitability, SLNAW's ROE is +0.81%, compared to AGS's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, SLNAW is more volatile compared to AGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLNAW.
SLNAW vs BALY Comparison
SLNAW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLNAW stands at 526.4K. In comparison, BALY has a market cap of 465.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SLNAW is priced at $0.01, while BALY trades at $9.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLNAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BALY's P/E ratio is -1.09. In terms of profitability, SLNAW's ROE is +0.81%, compared to BALY's ROE of -1.56%. Regarding short-term risk, SLNAW is more volatile compared to BALY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLNAW.
SLNAW vs GAMB Comparison
SLNAW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLNAW stands at 526.4K. In comparison, GAMB has a market cap of 425.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SLNAW is priced at $0.01, while GAMB trades at $11.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLNAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GAMB's P/E ratio is 12.46. In terms of profitability, SLNAW's ROE is +0.81%, compared to GAMB's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SLNAW is more volatile compared to GAMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLNAW.
SLNAW vs CDRO Comparison
SLNAW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLNAW stands at 526.4K. In comparison, CDRO has a market cap of 383.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SLNAW is priced at $0.01, while CDRO trades at $8.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLNAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CDRO's P/E ratio is 93.33. In terms of profitability, SLNAW's ROE is +0.81%, compared to CDRO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SLNAW is more volatile compared to CDRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLNAW.
SLNAW vs INSE Comparison
SLNAW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLNAW stands at 526.4K. In comparison, INSE has a market cap of 225.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SLNAW is priced at $0.01, while INSE trades at $8.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLNAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INSE's P/E ratio is 3.44. In terms of profitability, SLNAW's ROE is +0.81%, compared to INSE's ROE of -1.75%. Regarding short-term risk, SLNAW is more volatile compared to INSE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLNAW.
SLNAW vs MSC Comparison
SLNAW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLNAW stands at 526.4K. In comparison, MSC has a market cap of 215.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SLNAW is priced at $0.01, while MSC trades at $3.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLNAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MSC's P/E ratio is -8.96. In terms of profitability, SLNAW's ROE is +0.81%, compared to MSC's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SLNAW is more volatile compared to MSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLNAW.
SLNAW vs FLL Comparison
SLNAW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLNAW stands at 526.4K. In comparison, FLL has a market cap of 141.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SLNAW is priced at $0.01, while FLL trades at $3.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLNAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLL's P/E ratio is -3.58. In terms of profitability, SLNAW's ROE is +0.81%, compared to FLL's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, SLNAW is more volatile compared to FLL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLNAW.
SLNAW vs CPHC Comparison
SLNAW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLNAW stands at 526.4K. In comparison, CPHC has a market cap of 96.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SLNAW is priced at $0.01, while CPHC trades at $18.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLNAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CPHC's P/E ratio is 119.00. In terms of profitability, SLNAW's ROE is +0.81%, compared to CPHC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SLNAW is more volatile compared to CPHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLNAW.
SLNAW vs GAN Comparison
SLNAW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLNAW stands at 526.4K. In comparison, GAN has a market cap of 91.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SLNAW is priced at $0.01, while GAN trades at $1.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLNAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GAN's P/E ratio is -8.21. In terms of profitability, SLNAW's ROE is +0.81%, compared to GAN's ROE of +0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, SLNAW is more volatile compared to GAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLNAW.
SLNAW vs CNTY Comparison
SLNAW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLNAW stands at 526.4K. In comparison, CNTY has a market cap of 66M. Regarding current trading prices, SLNAW is priced at $0.01, while CNTY trades at $2.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLNAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNTY's P/E ratio is -0.49. In terms of profitability, SLNAW's ROE is +0.81%, compared to CNTY's ROE of -6.50%. Regarding short-term risk, SLNAW is more volatile compared to CNTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLNAW.
SLNAW vs CDROW Comparison
SLNAW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLNAW stands at 526.4K. In comparison, CDROW has a market cap of 46.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SLNAW is priced at $0.01, while CDROW trades at $1.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLNAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CDROW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLNAW's ROE is +0.81%, compared to CDROW's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SLNAW is more volatile compared to CDROW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLNAW.
SLNAW vs LTRY Comparison
SLNAW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLNAW stands at 526.4K. In comparison, LTRY has a market cap of 34.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SLNAW is priced at $0.01, while LTRY trades at $1.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLNAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LTRY's P/E ratio is -0.63. In terms of profitability, SLNAW's ROE is +0.81%, compared to LTRY's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, SLNAW is more volatile compared to LTRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLNAW.
SLNAW vs LTRYW Comparison
SLNAW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLNAW stands at 526.4K. In comparison, LTRYW has a market cap of 29.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SLNAW is priced at $0.01, while LTRYW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLNAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LTRYW's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, SLNAW's ROE is +0.81%, compared to LTRYW's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, SLNAW is more volatile compared to LTRYW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLNAW.
SLNAW vs SLNA Comparison
SLNAW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLNAW stands at 526.4K. In comparison, SLNA has a market cap of 16.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SLNAW is priced at $0.01, while SLNA trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLNAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SLNA's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, SLNAW's ROE is +0.81%, compared to SLNA's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, SLNAW is less volatile compared to SLNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLNAW.
SLNAW vs GMBL Comparison
SLNAW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLNAW stands at 526.4K. In comparison, GMBL has a market cap of 339.2K. Regarding current trading prices, SLNAW is priced at $0.01, while GMBL trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLNAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GMBL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLNAW's ROE is +0.81%, compared to GMBL's ROE of +1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, SLNAW is more volatile compared to GMBL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLNAW.
SLNAW vs GMBLP Comparison
SLNAW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLNAW stands at 526.4K. In comparison, GMBLP has a market cap of 41K. Regarding current trading prices, SLNAW is priced at $0.01, while GMBLP trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLNAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GMBLP's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SLNAW's ROE is +0.81%, compared to GMBLP's ROE of +1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, SLNAW is more volatile compared to GMBLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLNAW.
SLNAW vs GMBLW Comparison
SLNAW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLNAW stands at 526.4K. In comparison, GMBLW has a market cap of 31.1K. Regarding current trading prices, SLNAW is priced at $0.01, while GMBLW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLNAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GMBLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLNAW's ROE is +0.81%, compared to GMBLW's ROE of +1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, SLNAW is less volatile compared to GMBLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLNAW.
SLNAW vs EBET Comparison
SLNAW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLNAW stands at 526.4K. In comparison, EBET has a market cap of 12K. Regarding current trading prices, SLNAW is priced at $0.01, while EBET trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLNAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EBET's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLNAW's ROE is +0.81%, compared to EBET's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SLNAW is more volatile compared to EBET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLNAW.
SLNAW vs GMBLZ Comparison
SLNAW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLNAW stands at 526.4K. In comparison, GMBLZ has a market cap of 1.5K. Regarding current trading prices, SLNAW is priced at $0.01, while GMBLZ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLNAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GMBLZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLNAW's ROE is +0.81%, compared to GMBLZ's ROE of +1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, SLNAW is more volatile compared to GMBLZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLNAW.
SLNAW vs GNOG Comparison
SLNAW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLNAW stands at 526.4K. In comparison, GNOG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SLNAW is priced at $0.01, while GNOG trades at $5.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLNAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GNOG's P/E ratio is -3.90. In terms of profitability, SLNAW's ROE is +0.81%, compared to GNOG's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SLNAW is more volatile compared to GNOG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLNAW.