Vail Resorts, Inc.
Vail Resorts, Inc. (MTN) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (MTN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Gambling, Resorts & Casinos Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MTN | $119.02 | -3.68% | 4.3B | 18.96 | $6.28 | +7.40% |
| LVS | $52.81 | +1.66% | 35.1B | 19.49 | $2.71 | +2.00% |
| FLUT | $111.57 | +5.21% | 19.6B | -63.77 | -$1.75 | N/A |
| DKNG | $23.18 | +4.56% | 11.5B | -2318.00 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| WYNN | $105.67 | +0.06% | 11B | 33.65 | $3.14 | +0.94% |
| MGM | $39.54 | +1.54% | 10.8B | 52.05 | $0.76 | N/A |
| LNW | $99.75 | +0.25% | 8.4B | 21.78 | $4.58 | N/A |
| CHDN | $101.55 | +3.72% | 7.1B | 18.70 | $5.43 | +0.43% |
| SGHC | $12.53 | +2.29% | 6.4B | 29.14 | $0.43 | +3.34% |
| BYD | $83.88 | -5.91% | 6.3B | 3.71 | $22.62 | +0.89% |
Stock Comparison
MTN vs LVS Comparison April 2026
MTN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTN stands at 4.3B. In comparison, LVS has a market cap of 35.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MTN is priced at $119.02, while LVS trades at $52.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTN currently has a P/E ratio of 18.96, whereas LVS's P/E ratio is 19.49. In terms of profitability, MTN's ROE is +0.52%, compared to LVS's ROE of +0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, MTN is more volatile compared to LVS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTN.Check LVS's competition here
MTN vs FLUT Comparison April 2026
MTN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTN stands at 4.3B. In comparison, FLUT has a market cap of 19.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MTN is priced at $119.02, while FLUT trades at $111.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTN currently has a P/E ratio of 18.96, whereas FLUT's P/E ratio is -63.77. In terms of profitability, MTN's ROE is +0.52%, compared to FLUT's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MTN is less volatile compared to FLUT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTN.Check FLUT's competition here
MTN vs DKNG Comparison April 2026
MTN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTN stands at 4.3B. In comparison, DKNG has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MTN is priced at $119.02, while DKNG trades at $23.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTN currently has a P/E ratio of 18.96, whereas DKNG's P/E ratio is -2318.00. In terms of profitability, MTN's ROE is +0.52%, compared to DKNG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTN is less volatile compared to DKNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTN.Check DKNG's competition here
MTN vs WYNN Comparison April 2026
MTN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTN stands at 4.3B. In comparison, WYNN has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, MTN is priced at $119.02, while WYNN trades at $105.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTN currently has a P/E ratio of 18.96, whereas WYNN's P/E ratio is 33.65. In terms of profitability, MTN's ROE is +0.52%, compared to WYNN's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, MTN is more volatile compared to WYNN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTN.Check WYNN's competition here
MTN vs MGM Comparison April 2026
MTN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTN stands at 4.3B. In comparison, MGM has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MTN is priced at $119.02, while MGM trades at $39.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTN currently has a P/E ratio of 18.96, whereas MGM's P/E ratio is 52.05. In terms of profitability, MTN's ROE is +0.52%, compared to MGM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MTN is less volatile compared to MGM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTN.Check MGM's competition here
MTN vs LNW Comparison April 2026
MTN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTN stands at 4.3B. In comparison, LNW has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MTN is priced at $119.02, while LNW trades at $99.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTN currently has a P/E ratio of 18.96, whereas LNW's P/E ratio is 21.78. In terms of profitability, MTN's ROE is +0.52%, compared to LNW's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, MTN is more volatile compared to LNW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTN.Check LNW's competition here
MTN vs CHDN Comparison April 2026
MTN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTN stands at 4.3B. In comparison, CHDN has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MTN is priced at $119.02, while CHDN trades at $101.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTN currently has a P/E ratio of 18.96, whereas CHDN's P/E ratio is 18.70. In terms of profitability, MTN's ROE is +0.52%, compared to CHDN's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, MTN is less volatile compared to CHDN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTN.Check CHDN's competition here
MTN vs SGHC Comparison April 2026
MTN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTN stands at 4.3B. In comparison, SGHC has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MTN is priced at $119.02, while SGHC trades at $12.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTN currently has a P/E ratio of 18.96, whereas SGHC's P/E ratio is 29.14. In terms of profitability, MTN's ROE is +0.52%, compared to SGHC's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, MTN is less volatile compared to SGHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTN.Check SGHC's competition here
MTN vs BYD Comparison April 2026
MTN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTN stands at 4.3B. In comparison, BYD has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MTN is priced at $119.02, while BYD trades at $83.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTN currently has a P/E ratio of 18.96, whereas BYD's P/E ratio is 3.71. In terms of profitability, MTN's ROE is +0.52%, compared to BYD's ROE of +0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, MTN is less volatile compared to BYD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTN.Check BYD's competition here
MTN vs CZR Comparison April 2026
MTN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTN stands at 4.3B. In comparison, CZR has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MTN is priced at $119.02, while CZR trades at $28.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTN currently has a P/E ratio of 18.96, whereas CZR's P/E ratio is -11.62. In terms of profitability, MTN's ROE is +0.52%, compared to CZR's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MTN is more volatile compared to CZR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTN.Check CZR's competition here
MTN vs RSI Comparison April 2026
MTN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTN stands at 4.3B. In comparison, RSI has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MTN is priced at $119.02, while RSI trades at $23.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTN currently has a P/E ratio of 18.96, whereas RSI's P/E ratio is 76.28. In terms of profitability, MTN's ROE is +0.52%, compared to RSI's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MTN is more volatile compared to RSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTN.Check RSI's competition here
MTN vs SGMS Comparison April 2026
MTN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTN stands at 4.3B. In comparison, SGMS has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MTN is priced at $119.02, while SGMS trades at $58.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTN currently has a P/E ratio of 18.96, whereas SGMS's P/E ratio is 30.71. In terms of profitability, MTN's ROE is +0.52%, compared to SGMS's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, MTN is less volatile compared to SGMS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTN.Check SGMS's competition here
MTN vs HGV Comparison April 2026
MTN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTN stands at 4.3B. In comparison, HGV has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MTN is priced at $119.02, while HGV trades at $46.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTN currently has a P/E ratio of 18.96, whereas HGV's P/E ratio is 51.84. In terms of profitability, MTN's ROE is +0.52%, compared to HGV's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MTN is more volatile compared to HGV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTN.Check HGV's competition here
MTN vs IGT Comparison April 2026
MTN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTN stands at 4.3B. In comparison, IGT has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MTN is priced at $119.02, while IGT trades at $16.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTN currently has a P/E ratio of 18.96, whereas IGT's P/E ratio is 148.09. In terms of profitability, MTN's ROE is +0.52%, compared to IGT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MTN is less volatile compared to IGT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTN.Check IGT's competition here
MTN vs RRR Comparison April 2026
MTN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTN stands at 4.3B. In comparison, RRR has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MTN is priced at $119.02, while RRR trades at $54.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTN currently has a P/E ratio of 18.96, whereas RRR's P/E ratio is 17.33. In terms of profitability, MTN's ROE is +0.52%, compared to RRR's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, MTN is more volatile compared to RRR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTN.Check RRR's competition here
MTN vs VAC Comparison April 2026
MTN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTN stands at 4.3B. In comparison, VAC has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MTN is priced at $119.02, while VAC trades at $72.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTN currently has a P/E ratio of 18.96, whereas VAC's P/E ratio is -8.20. In terms of profitability, MTN's ROE is +0.52%, compared to VAC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MTN is more volatile compared to VAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTN.Check VAC's competition here
MTN vs BRSL Comparison April 2026
MTN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTN stands at 4.3B. In comparison, BRSL has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MTN is priced at $119.02, while BRSL trades at $12.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTN currently has a P/E ratio of 18.96, whereas BRSL's P/E ratio is -1292.50. In terms of profitability, MTN's ROE is +0.52%, compared to BRSL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MTN is more volatile compared to BRSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTN.Check BRSL's competition here
MTN vs PENN Comparison April 2026
MTN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTN stands at 4.3B. In comparison, PENN has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MTN is priced at $119.02, while PENN trades at $17.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTN currently has a P/E ratio of 18.96, whereas PENN's P/E ratio is -2.62. In terms of profitability, MTN's ROE is +0.52%, compared to PENN's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, MTN is less volatile compared to PENN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTN.Check PENN's competition here
MTN vs MLCO Comparison April 2026
MTN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTN stands at 4.3B. In comparison, MLCO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MTN is priced at $119.02, while MLCO trades at $5.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTN currently has a P/E ratio of 18.96, whereas MLCO's P/E ratio is 12.24. In terms of profitability, MTN's ROE is +0.52%, compared to MLCO's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MTN is more volatile compared to MLCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTN.Check MLCO's competition here
MTN vs MCRI Comparison April 2026
MTN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTN stands at 4.3B. In comparison, MCRI has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MTN is priced at $119.02, while MCRI trades at $114.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTN currently has a P/E ratio of 18.96, whereas MCRI's P/E ratio is 19.49. In terms of profitability, MTN's ROE is +0.52%, compared to MCRI's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MTN is less volatile compared to MCRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTN.Check MCRI's competition here
MTN vs PLYA Comparison April 2026
MTN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTN stands at 4.3B. In comparison, PLYA has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MTN is priced at $119.02, while PLYA trades at $13.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTN currently has a P/E ratio of 18.96, whereas PLYA's P/E ratio is 26.43. In terms of profitability, MTN's ROE is +0.52%, compared to PLYA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MTN is more volatile compared to PLYA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTN.Check PLYA's competition here
MTN vs EVRI Comparison April 2026
MTN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTN stands at 4.3B. In comparison, EVRI has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MTN is priced at $119.02, while EVRI trades at $14.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTN currently has a P/E ratio of 18.96, whereas EVRI's P/E ratio is 89.00. In terms of profitability, MTN's ROE is +0.52%, compared to EVRI's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MTN is more volatile compared to EVRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTN.Check EVRI's competition here
MTN vs ACEL Comparison April 2026
MTN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTN stands at 4.3B. In comparison, ACEL has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, MTN is priced at $119.02, while ACEL trades at $12.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTN currently has a P/E ratio of 18.96, whereas ACEL's P/E ratio is 20.52. In terms of profitability, MTN's ROE is +0.52%, compared to ACEL's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MTN is more volatile compared to ACEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTN.Check ACEL's competition here
MTN vs BVH Comparison April 2026
MTN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTN stands at 4.3B. In comparison, BVH has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, MTN is priced at $119.02, while BVH trades at $75.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTN currently has a P/E ratio of 18.96, whereas BVH's P/E ratio is 20.05. In terms of profitability, MTN's ROE is +0.52%, compared to BVH's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MTN is more volatile compared to BVH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTN.Check BVH's competition here
MTN vs NGMS Comparison April 2026
MTN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTN stands at 4.3B. In comparison, NGMS has a market cap of 998.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MTN is priced at $119.02, while NGMS trades at $29.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTN currently has a P/E ratio of 18.96, whereas NGMS's P/E ratio is -81.81. In terms of profitability, MTN's ROE is +0.52%, compared to NGMS's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MTN is more volatile compared to NGMS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTN.Check NGMS's competition here
MTN vs FBYDP Comparison April 2026
MTN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTN stands at 4.3B. In comparison, FBYDP has a market cap of 770.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MTN is priced at $119.02, while FBYDP trades at $14.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTN currently has a P/E ratio of 18.96, whereas FBYDP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTN's ROE is +0.52%, compared to FBYDP's ROE of -2.55%. Regarding short-term risk, MTN is less volatile compared to FBYDP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTN.Check FBYDP's competition here
MTN vs GDEN Comparison April 2026
MTN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTN stands at 4.3B. In comparison, GDEN has a market cap of 748.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MTN is priced at $119.02, while GDEN trades at $28.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTN currently has a P/E ratio of 18.96, whereas GDEN's P/E ratio is -123.26. In terms of profitability, MTN's ROE is +0.52%, compared to GDEN's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MTN is more volatile compared to GDEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTN.Check GDEN's competition here
MTN vs TPGH-UN Comparison April 2026
MTN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTN stands at 4.3B. In comparison, TPGH-UN has a market cap of 580.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MTN is priced at $119.02, while TPGH-UN trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTN currently has a P/E ratio of 18.96, whereas TPGH-UN's P/E ratio is -1000.00. In terms of profitability, MTN's ROE is +0.52%, compared to TPGH-UN's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, MTN is more volatile compared to TPGH-UN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTN.Check TPGH-UN's competition here
MTN vs BALY Comparison April 2026
MTN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTN stands at 4.3B. In comparison, BALY has a market cap of 521.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MTN is priced at $119.02, while BALY trades at $12.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTN currently has a P/E ratio of 18.96, whereas BALY's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, MTN's ROE is +0.52%, compared to BALY's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, MTN is less volatile compared to BALY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTN.Check BALY's competition here
MTN vs AGS Comparison April 2026
MTN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTN stands at 4.3B. In comparison, AGS has a market cap of 518.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MTN is priced at $119.02, while AGS trades at $12.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTN currently has a P/E ratio of 18.96, whereas AGS's P/E ratio is 10.77. In terms of profitability, MTN's ROE is +0.52%, compared to AGS's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, MTN is more volatile compared to AGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTN.Check AGS's competition here
MTN vs CDRO Comparison April 2026
MTN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTN stands at 4.3B. In comparison, CDRO has a market cap of 404.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MTN is priced at $119.02, while CDRO trades at $8.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTN currently has a P/E ratio of 18.96, whereas CDRO's P/E ratio is 443.50. In terms of profitability, MTN's ROE is +0.52%, compared to CDRO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MTN is more volatile compared to CDRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTN.Check CDRO's competition here
MTN vs INSE Comparison April 2026
MTN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTN stands at 4.3B. In comparison, INSE has a market cap of 190.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MTN is priced at $119.02, while INSE trades at $7.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTN currently has a P/E ratio of 18.96, whereas INSE's P/E ratio is -12.14. In terms of profitability, MTN's ROE is +0.52%, compared to INSE's ROE of +1.84%. Regarding short-term risk, MTN is less volatile compared to INSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTN.Check INSE's competition here
MTN vs MSC Comparison April 2026
MTN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTN stands at 4.3B. In comparison, MSC has a market cap of 130.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MTN is priced at $119.02, while MSC trades at $2.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTN currently has a P/E ratio of 18.96, whereas MSC's P/E ratio is -9.03. In terms of profitability, MTN's ROE is +0.52%, compared to MSC's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MTN is less volatile compared to MSC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTN.Check MSC's competition here
MTN vs GAMB Comparison April 2026
MTN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTN stands at 4.3B. In comparison, GAMB has a market cap of 128.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MTN is priced at $119.02, while GAMB trades at $3.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTN currently has a P/E ratio of 18.96, whereas GAMB's P/E ratio is -3.94. In terms of profitability, MTN's ROE is +0.52%, compared to GAMB's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MTN is less volatile compared to GAMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTN.Check GAMB's competition here
MTN vs GAN Comparison April 2026
MTN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTN stands at 4.3B. In comparison, GAN has a market cap of 91.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MTN is priced at $119.02, while GAN trades at $1.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTN currently has a P/E ratio of 18.96, whereas GAN's P/E ratio is -8.21. In terms of profitability, MTN's ROE is +0.52%, compared to GAN's ROE of +0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, MTN is more volatile compared to GAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTN.Check GAN's competition here
MTN vs FLL Comparison April 2026
MTN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTN stands at 4.3B. In comparison, FLL has a market cap of 90.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MTN is priced at $119.02, while FLL trades at $2.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTN currently has a P/E ratio of 18.96, whereas FLL's P/E ratio is -2.22. In terms of profitability, MTN's ROE is +0.52%, compared to FLL's ROE of -2.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MTN is less volatile compared to FLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTN.Check FLL's competition here
MTN vs CPHC Comparison April 2026
MTN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTN stands at 4.3B. In comparison, CPHC has a market cap of 80.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MTN is priced at $119.02, while CPHC trades at $15.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTN currently has a P/E ratio of 18.96, whereas CPHC's P/E ratio is -157.10. In terms of profitability, MTN's ROE is +0.52%, compared to CPHC's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MTN is more volatile compared to CPHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTN.Check CPHC's competition here
MTN vs ROLR Comparison April 2026
MTN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTN stands at 4.3B. In comparison, ROLR has a market cap of 79.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MTN is priced at $119.02, while ROLR trades at $9.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTN currently has a P/E ratio of 18.96, whereas ROLR's P/E ratio is 133.86. In terms of profitability, MTN's ROE is +0.52%, compared to ROLR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MTN is less volatile compared to ROLR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTN.Check ROLR's competition here
MTN vs CNTY Comparison April 2026
MTN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTN stands at 4.3B. In comparison, CNTY has a market cap of 42.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MTN is priced at $119.02, while CNTY trades at $1.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTN currently has a P/E ratio of 18.96, whereas CNTY's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, MTN's ROE is +0.52%, compared to CNTY's ROE of +1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTN is less volatile compared to CNTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTN.Check CNTY's competition here
MTN vs LTRY Comparison April 2026
MTN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTN stands at 4.3B. In comparison, LTRY has a market cap of 36.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MTN is priced at $119.02, while LTRY trades at $1.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTN currently has a P/E ratio of 18.96, whereas LTRY's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, MTN's ROE is +0.52%, compared to LTRY's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, MTN is less volatile compared to LTRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTN.Check LTRY's competition here
MTN vs CDROW Comparison April 2026
MTN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTN stands at 4.3B. In comparison, CDROW has a market cap of 34.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MTN is priced at $119.02, while CDROW trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTN currently has a P/E ratio of 18.96, whereas CDROW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTN's ROE is +0.52%, compared to CDROW's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MTN is more volatile compared to CDROW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTN.Check CDROW's competition here
MTN vs SLNA Comparison April 2026
MTN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTN stands at 4.3B. In comparison, SLNA has a market cap of 16.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MTN is priced at $119.02, while SLNA trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTN currently has a P/E ratio of 18.96, whereas SLNA's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, MTN's ROE is +0.52%, compared to SLNA's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, MTN is less volatile compared to SLNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTN.Check SLNA's competition here
MTN vs SEGG Comparison April 2026
MTN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTN stands at 4.3B. In comparison, SEGG has a market cap of 8.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MTN is priced at $119.02, while SEGG trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTN currently has a P/E ratio of 18.96, whereas SEGG's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, MTN's ROE is +0.52%, compared to SEGG's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, MTN is less volatile compared to SEGG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTN.Check SEGG's competition here
MTN vs SLNAW Comparison April 2026
MTN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTN stands at 4.3B. In comparison, SLNAW has a market cap of 526.4K. Regarding current trading prices, MTN is priced at $119.02, while SLNAW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTN currently has a P/E ratio of 18.96, whereas SLNAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTN's ROE is +0.52%, compared to SLNAW's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, MTN is less volatile compared to SLNAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTN.Check SLNAW's competition here
MTN vs GMBL Comparison April 2026
MTN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTN stands at 4.3B. In comparison, GMBL has a market cap of 194.8K. Regarding current trading prices, MTN is priced at $119.02, while GMBL trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTN currently has a P/E ratio of 18.96, whereas GMBL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTN's ROE is +0.52%, compared to GMBL's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MTN is more volatile compared to GMBL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTN.Check GMBL's competition here
MTN vs LTRYW Comparison April 2026
MTN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTN stands at 4.3B. In comparison, LTRYW has a market cap of 35.5K. Regarding current trading prices, MTN is priced at $119.02, while LTRYW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTN currently has a P/E ratio of 18.96, whereas LTRYW's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, MTN's ROE is +0.52%, compared to LTRYW's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, MTN is less volatile compared to LTRYW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTN.Check LTRYW's competition here
MTN vs GMBLW Comparison April 2026
MTN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTN stands at 4.3B. In comparison, GMBLW has a market cap of 31.1K. Regarding current trading prices, MTN is priced at $119.02, while GMBLW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTN currently has a P/E ratio of 18.96, whereas GMBLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTN's ROE is +0.52%, compared to GMBLW's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MTN is less volatile compared to GMBLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTN.Check GMBLW's competition here
MTN vs GMBLP Comparison April 2026
MTN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTN stands at 4.3B. In comparison, GMBLP has a market cap of 21.2K. Regarding current trading prices, MTN is priced at $119.02, while GMBLP trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTN currently has a P/E ratio of 18.96, whereas GMBLP's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MTN's ROE is +0.52%, compared to GMBLP's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MTN is more volatile compared to GMBLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTN.Check GMBLP's competition here
MTN vs EBET Comparison April 2026
MTN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTN stands at 4.3B. In comparison, EBET has a market cap of 1.5K. Regarding current trading prices, MTN is priced at $119.02, while EBET trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTN currently has a P/E ratio of 18.96, whereas EBET's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTN's ROE is +0.52%, compared to EBET's ROE of +6.32%. Regarding short-term risk, MTN is more volatile compared to EBET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTN.Check EBET's competition here
MTN vs GMBLZ Comparison April 2026
MTN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTN stands at 4.3B. In comparison, GMBLZ has a market cap of 1.5K. Regarding current trading prices, MTN is priced at $119.02, while GMBLZ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTN currently has a P/E ratio of 18.96, whereas GMBLZ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, MTN's ROE is +0.52%, compared to GMBLZ's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MTN is less volatile compared to GMBLZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTN.Check GMBLZ's competition here
MTN vs GNOG Comparison April 2026
MTN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTN stands at 4.3B. In comparison, GNOG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MTN is priced at $119.02, while GNOG trades at $5.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTN currently has a P/E ratio of 18.96, whereas GNOG's P/E ratio is -3.90. In terms of profitability, MTN's ROE is +0.52%, compared to GNOG's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MTN is less volatile compared to GNOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTN.Check GNOG's competition here
MTN vs PNK Comparison April 2026
MTN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTN stands at 4.3B. In comparison, PNK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MTN is priced at $119.02, while PNK trades at $32.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTN currently has a P/E ratio of 18.96, whereas PNK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTN's ROE is +0.52%, compared to PNK's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MTN is more volatile compared to PNK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTN.Check PNK's competition here