Inspired Entertainment, Inc. (INSE) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (INSE) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Gambling, Resorts & Casinos Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| INSE | $7.80 | -5.52% | 206.7M | -70.45 | -$0.11 | N/A |
| LVS | $47.24 | +2.26% | 30.6B | 13.89 | $3.33 | +2.39% |
| FLUT | $106.81 | +4.54% | 18.3B | 13.96 | $7.55 | N/A |
| DKNG | $25.84 | +2.31% | 12.8B | 37.90 | $0.68 | N/A |
| MGM | $46.92 | -1.86% | 12.2B | 15.24 | $3.12 | N/A |
| WYNN | $95.81 | -1.32% | 10B | 21.99 | $4.37 | +1.03% |
| LNW | $99.75 | +0.25% | 8.4B | 21.78 | $4.58 | N/A |
| RSI | $31.60 | +6.25% | 7.4B | 74.45 | $0.42 | N/A |
| SGHC | $14.63 | +7.97% | 7.1B | 28.82 | $0.49 | +3.09% |
| BYD | $87.34 | -1.13% | 6.5B | 11.89 | $7.40 | +0.87% |
Stock Comparison
INSE vs LVS Comparison July 2026
INSE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INSE stands at 206.7M. In comparison, LVS has a market cap of 30.6B. Regarding current trading prices, INSE is priced at $7.80, while LVS trades at $47.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INSE currently has a P/E ratio of -70.45, whereas LVS's P/E ratio is 13.89. In terms of profitability, INSE's ROE is +1.48%, compared to LVS's ROE of +1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, INSE is more volatile compared to LVS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INSE.Check LVS's competition here
INSE vs FLUT Comparison July 2026
INSE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INSE stands at 206.7M. In comparison, FLUT has a market cap of 18.3B. Regarding current trading prices, INSE is priced at $7.80, while FLUT trades at $106.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INSE currently has a P/E ratio of -70.45, whereas FLUT's P/E ratio is 13.96. In terms of profitability, INSE's ROE is +1.48%, compared to FLUT's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, INSE is less volatile compared to FLUT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INSE.Check FLUT's competition here
INSE vs DKNG Comparison July 2026
INSE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INSE stands at 206.7M. In comparison, DKNG has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, INSE is priced at $7.80, while DKNG trades at $25.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INSE currently has a P/E ratio of -70.45, whereas DKNG's P/E ratio is 37.90. In terms of profitability, INSE's ROE is +1.48%, compared to DKNG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, INSE is more volatile compared to DKNG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INSE.Check DKNG's competition here
INSE vs MGM Comparison July 2026
INSE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INSE stands at 206.7M. In comparison, MGM has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, INSE is priced at $7.80, while MGM trades at $46.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INSE currently has a P/E ratio of -70.45, whereas MGM's P/E ratio is 15.24. In terms of profitability, INSE's ROE is +1.48%, compared to MGM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, INSE is more volatile compared to MGM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INSE.Check MGM's competition here
INSE vs WYNN Comparison July 2026
INSE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INSE stands at 206.7M. In comparison, WYNN has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, INSE is priced at $7.80, while WYNN trades at $95.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INSE currently has a P/E ratio of -70.45, whereas WYNN's P/E ratio is 21.99. In terms of profitability, INSE's ROE is +1.48%, compared to WYNN's ROE of -1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, INSE is more volatile compared to WYNN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INSE.Check WYNN's competition here
INSE vs LNW Comparison July 2026
INSE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INSE stands at 206.7M. In comparison, LNW has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, INSE is priced at $7.80, while LNW trades at $99.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INSE currently has a P/E ratio of -70.45, whereas LNW's P/E ratio is 21.78. In terms of profitability, INSE's ROE is +1.48%, compared to LNW's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, INSE is more volatile compared to LNW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INSE.Check LNW's competition here
INSE vs RSI Comparison July 2026
INSE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INSE stands at 206.7M. In comparison, RSI has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, INSE is priced at $7.80, while RSI trades at $31.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INSE currently has a P/E ratio of -70.45, whereas RSI's P/E ratio is 74.45. In terms of profitability, INSE's ROE is +1.48%, compared to RSI's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, INSE is more volatile compared to RSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INSE.Check RSI's competition here
INSE vs SGHC Comparison July 2026
INSE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INSE stands at 206.7M. In comparison, SGHC has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, INSE is priced at $7.80, while SGHC trades at $14.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INSE currently has a P/E ratio of -70.45, whereas SGHC's P/E ratio is 28.82. In terms of profitability, INSE's ROE is +1.48%, compared to SGHC's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, INSE is less volatile compared to SGHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INSE.Check SGHC's competition here
INSE vs BYD Comparison July 2026
INSE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INSE stands at 206.7M. In comparison, BYD has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, INSE is priced at $7.80, while BYD trades at $87.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INSE currently has a P/E ratio of -70.45, whereas BYD's P/E ratio is 11.89. In terms of profitability, INSE's ROE is +1.48%, compared to BYD's ROE of +0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, INSE is more volatile compared to BYD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INSE.Check BYD's competition here
INSE vs CHDN Comparison July 2026
INSE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INSE stands at 206.7M. In comparison, CHDN has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, INSE is priced at $7.80, while CHDN trades at $90.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INSE currently has a P/E ratio of -70.45, whereas CHDN's P/E ratio is 14.00. In terms of profitability, INSE's ROE is +1.48%, compared to CHDN's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, INSE is more volatile compared to CHDN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INSE.Check CHDN's competition here
INSE vs CZR Comparison July 2026
INSE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INSE stands at 206.7M. In comparison, CZR has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, INSE is priced at $7.80, while CZR trades at $30.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INSE currently has a P/E ratio of -70.45, whereas CZR's P/E ratio is -12.83. In terms of profitability, INSE's ROE is +1.48%, compared to CZR's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, INSE is more volatile compared to CZR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INSE.Check CZR's competition here
INSE vs SGMS Comparison July 2026
INSE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INSE stands at 206.7M. In comparison, SGMS has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, INSE is priced at $7.80, while SGMS trades at $58.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INSE currently has a P/E ratio of -70.45, whereas SGMS's P/E ratio is 30.71. In terms of profitability, INSE's ROE is +1.48%, compared to SGMS's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, INSE is less volatile compared to SGMS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INSE.Check SGMS's competition here
INSE vs MTN Comparison July 2026
INSE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INSE stands at 206.7M. In comparison, MTN has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, INSE is priced at $7.80, while MTN trades at $140.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INSE currently has a P/E ratio of -70.45, whereas MTN's P/E ratio is 30.99. In terms of profitability, INSE's ROE is +1.48%, compared to MTN's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, INSE is more volatile compared to MTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INSE.Check MTN's competition here
INSE vs RRR Comparison July 2026
INSE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INSE stands at 206.7M. In comparison, RRR has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, INSE is priced at $7.80, while RRR trades at $64.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INSE currently has a P/E ratio of -70.45, whereas RRR's P/E ratio is 20.64. In terms of profitability, INSE's ROE is +1.48%, compared to RRR's ROE of +0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, INSE is less volatile compared to RRR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INSE.Check RRR's competition here
INSE vs VAC Comparison July 2026
INSE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INSE stands at 206.7M. In comparison, VAC has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, INSE is priced at $7.80, while VAC trades at $98.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INSE currently has a P/E ratio of -70.45, whereas VAC's P/E ratio is 14.82. In terms of profitability, INSE's ROE is +1.48%, compared to VAC's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, INSE is less volatile compared to VAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INSE.Check VAC's competition here
INSE vs IGT Comparison July 2026
INSE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INSE stands at 206.7M. In comparison, IGT has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, INSE is priced at $7.80, while IGT trades at $16.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INSE currently has a P/E ratio of -70.45, whereas IGT's P/E ratio is 148.09. In terms of profitability, INSE's ROE is +1.48%, compared to IGT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, INSE is less volatile compared to IGT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INSE.Check IGT's competition here
INSE vs PENN Comparison July 2026
INSE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INSE stands at 206.7M. In comparison, PENN has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, INSE is priced at $7.80, while PENN trades at $21.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INSE currently has a P/E ratio of -70.45, whereas PENN's P/E ratio is 358.17. In terms of profitability, INSE's ROE is +1.48%, compared to PENN's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, INSE is more volatile compared to PENN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INSE.Check PENN's competition here
INSE vs MCRI Comparison July 2026
INSE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INSE stands at 206.7M. In comparison, MCRI has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, INSE is priced at $7.80, while MCRI trades at $130.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INSE currently has a P/E ratio of -70.45, whereas MCRI's P/E ratio is 22.05. In terms of profitability, INSE's ROE is +1.48%, compared to MCRI's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, INSE is more volatile compared to MCRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INSE.Check MCRI's competition here
INSE vs BRSL Comparison July 2026
INSE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INSE stands at 206.7M. In comparison, BRSL has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, INSE is priced at $7.80, while BRSL trades at $11.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INSE currently has a P/E ratio of -70.45, whereas BRSL's P/E ratio is 11.36. In terms of profitability, INSE's ROE is +1.48%, compared to BRSL's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, INSE is more volatile compared to BRSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INSE.Check BRSL's competition here
INSE vs MLCO Comparison July 2026
INSE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INSE stands at 206.7M. In comparison, MLCO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, INSE is priced at $7.80, while MLCO trades at $5.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INSE currently has a P/E ratio of -70.45, whereas MLCO's P/E ratio is 6.63. In terms of profitability, INSE's ROE is +1.48%, compared to MLCO's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, INSE is less volatile compared to MLCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INSE.Check MLCO's competition here
INSE vs PLYA Comparison July 2026
INSE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INSE stands at 206.7M. In comparison, PLYA has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, INSE is priced at $7.80, while PLYA trades at $13.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INSE currently has a P/E ratio of -70.45, whereas PLYA's P/E ratio is 26.43. In terms of profitability, INSE's ROE is +1.48%, compared to PLYA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, INSE is more volatile compared to PLYA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INSE.Check PLYA's competition here
INSE vs EVRI Comparison July 2026
INSE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INSE stands at 206.7M. In comparison, EVRI has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, INSE is priced at $7.80, while EVRI trades at $14.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INSE currently has a P/E ratio of -70.45, whereas EVRI's P/E ratio is 89.00. In terms of profitability, INSE's ROE is +1.48%, compared to EVRI's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, INSE is more volatile compared to EVRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INSE.Check EVRI's competition here
INSE vs ACEL Comparison July 2026
INSE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INSE stands at 206.7M. In comparison, ACEL has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, INSE is priced at $7.80, while ACEL trades at $12.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INSE currently has a P/E ratio of -70.45, whereas ACEL's P/E ratio is 15.02. In terms of profitability, INSE's ROE is +1.48%, compared to ACEL's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, INSE is more volatile compared to ACEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INSE.Check ACEL's competition here
INSE vs BVH Comparison July 2026
INSE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INSE stands at 206.7M. In comparison, BVH has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, INSE is priced at $7.80, while BVH trades at $75.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INSE currently has a P/E ratio of -70.45, whereas BVH's P/E ratio is 20.05. In terms of profitability, INSE's ROE is +1.48%, compared to BVH's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, INSE is more volatile compared to BVH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INSE.Check BVH's competition here
INSE vs NGMS Comparison July 2026
INSE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INSE stands at 206.7M. In comparison, NGMS has a market cap of 998.2M. Regarding current trading prices, INSE is priced at $7.80, while NGMS trades at $29.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INSE currently has a P/E ratio of -70.45, whereas NGMS's P/E ratio is -81.81. In terms of profitability, INSE's ROE is +1.48%, compared to NGMS's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, INSE is more volatile compared to NGMS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INSE.Check NGMS's competition here
INSE vs FBYDP Comparison July 2026
INSE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INSE stands at 206.7M. In comparison, FBYDP has a market cap of 770.6M. Regarding current trading prices, INSE is priced at $7.80, while FBYDP trades at $14.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INSE currently has a P/E ratio of -70.45, whereas FBYDP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INSE's ROE is +1.48%, compared to FBYDP's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, INSE is less volatile compared to FBYDP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INSE.Check FBYDP's competition here
INSE vs GDEN Comparison July 2026
INSE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INSE stands at 206.7M. In comparison, GDEN has a market cap of 753.7M. Regarding current trading prices, INSE is priced at $7.80, while GDEN trades at $28.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INSE currently has a P/E ratio of -70.45, whereas GDEN's P/E ratio is -124.13. In terms of profitability, INSE's ROE is +1.48%, compared to GDEN's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, INSE is more volatile compared to GDEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INSE.Check GDEN's competition here
INSE vs BALY Comparison July 2026
INSE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INSE stands at 206.7M. In comparison, BALY has a market cap of 697.5M. Regarding current trading prices, INSE is priced at $7.80, while BALY trades at $14.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INSE currently has a P/E ratio of -70.45, whereas BALY's P/E ratio is -1.64. In terms of profitability, INSE's ROE is +1.48%, compared to BALY's ROE of -1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, INSE is more volatile compared to BALY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INSE.Check BALY's competition here
INSE vs TPGH-UN Comparison July 2026
INSE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INSE stands at 206.7M. In comparison, TPGH-UN has a market cap of 580.3M. Regarding current trading prices, INSE is priced at $7.80, while TPGH-UN trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INSE currently has a P/E ratio of -70.45, whereas TPGH-UN's P/E ratio is -1000.00. In terms of profitability, INSE's ROE is +1.48%, compared to TPGH-UN's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, INSE is more volatile compared to TPGH-UN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INSE.Check TPGH-UN's competition here
INSE vs AGS Comparison July 2026
INSE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INSE stands at 206.7M. In comparison, AGS has a market cap of 518.4M. Regarding current trading prices, INSE is priced at $7.80, while AGS trades at $12.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INSE currently has a P/E ratio of -70.45, whereas AGS's P/E ratio is 10.77. In terms of profitability, INSE's ROE is +1.48%, compared to AGS's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, INSE is more volatile compared to AGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INSE.Check AGS's competition here
INSE vs CDRO Comparison July 2026
INSE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INSE stands at 206.7M. In comparison, CDRO has a market cap of 427.4M. Regarding current trading prices, INSE is priced at $7.80, while CDRO trades at $9.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INSE currently has a P/E ratio of -70.45, whereas CDRO's P/E ratio is 47.24. In terms of profitability, INSE's ROE is +1.48%, compared to CDRO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, INSE is more volatile compared to CDRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INSE.Check CDRO's competition here
INSE vs CDROW Comparison July 2026
INSE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INSE stands at 206.7M. In comparison, CDROW has a market cap of 377.6M. Regarding current trading prices, INSE is priced at $7.80, while CDROW trades at $0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INSE currently has a P/E ratio of -70.45, whereas CDROW's P/E ratio is 5.26. In terms of profitability, INSE's ROE is +1.48%, compared to CDROW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, INSE is more volatile compared to CDROW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INSE.Check CDROW's competition here
INSE vs FLL Comparison July 2026
INSE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INSE stands at 206.7M. In comparison, FLL has a market cap of 103M. Regarding current trading prices, INSE is priced at $7.80, while FLL trades at $2.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INSE currently has a P/E ratio of -70.45, whereas FLL's P/E ratio is -2.65. In terms of profitability, INSE's ROE is +1.48%, compared to FLL's ROE of -4.73%. Regarding short-term risk, INSE is less volatile compared to FLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INSE.Check FLL's competition here
INSE vs MSC Comparison July 2026
INSE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INSE stands at 206.7M. In comparison, MSC has a market cap of 93.4M. Regarding current trading prices, INSE is priced at $7.80, while MSC trades at $1.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INSE currently has a P/E ratio of -70.45, whereas MSC's P/E ratio is -8.82. In terms of profitability, INSE's ROE is +1.48%, compared to MSC's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, INSE is more volatile compared to MSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INSE.Check MSC's competition here
INSE vs GAN Comparison July 2026
INSE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INSE stands at 206.7M. In comparison, GAN has a market cap of 91.5M. Regarding current trading prices, INSE is priced at $7.80, while GAN trades at $1.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INSE currently has a P/E ratio of -70.45, whereas GAN's P/E ratio is -8.21. In terms of profitability, INSE's ROE is +1.48%, compared to GAN's ROE of +0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, INSE is more volatile compared to GAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INSE.Check GAN's competition here
INSE vs CPHC Comparison July 2026
INSE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INSE stands at 206.7M. In comparison, CPHC has a market cap of 83.1M. Regarding current trading prices, INSE is priced at $7.80, while CPHC trades at $16.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INSE currently has a P/E ratio of -70.45, whereas CPHC's P/E ratio is -1614.00. In terms of profitability, INSE's ROE is +1.48%, compared to CPHC's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, INSE is more volatile compared to CPHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INSE.Check CPHC's competition here
INSE vs LTRY Comparison July 2026
INSE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INSE stands at 206.7M. In comparison, LTRY has a market cap of 36.6M. Regarding current trading prices, INSE is priced at $7.80, while LTRY trades at $1.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INSE currently has a P/E ratio of -70.45, whereas LTRY's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, INSE's ROE is +1.48%, compared to LTRY's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, INSE is less volatile compared to LTRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INSE.Check LTRY's competition here
INSE vs CNTY Comparison July 2026
INSE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INSE stands at 206.7M. In comparison, CNTY has a market cap of 36.3M. Regarding current trading prices, INSE is priced at $7.80, while CNTY trades at $1.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INSE currently has a P/E ratio of -70.45, whereas CNTY's P/E ratio is -0.66. In terms of profitability, INSE's ROE is +1.48%, compared to CNTY's ROE of +0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, INSE is less volatile compared to CNTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INSE.Check CNTY's competition here
INSE vs SLNA Comparison July 2026
INSE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INSE stands at 206.7M. In comparison, SLNA has a market cap of 16.3M. Regarding current trading prices, INSE is priced at $7.80, while SLNA trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INSE currently has a P/E ratio of -70.45, whereas SLNA's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, INSE's ROE is +1.48%, compared to SLNA's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, INSE is less volatile compared to SLNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INSE.Check SLNA's competition here
INSE vs SEGG Comparison July 2026
INSE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INSE stands at 206.7M. In comparison, SEGG has a market cap of 11.8M. Regarding current trading prices, INSE is priced at $7.80, while SEGG trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INSE currently has a P/E ratio of -70.45, whereas SEGG's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, INSE's ROE is +1.48%, compared to SEGG's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, INSE is less volatile compared to SEGG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INSE.Check SEGG's competition here
INSE vs SLNAW Comparison July 2026
INSE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INSE stands at 206.7M. In comparison, SLNAW has a market cap of 526.4K. Regarding current trading prices, INSE is priced at $7.80, while SLNAW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INSE currently has a P/E ratio of -70.45, whereas SLNAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INSE's ROE is +1.48%, compared to SLNAW's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, INSE is less volatile compared to SLNAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INSE.Check SLNAW's competition here
INSE vs LTRYW Comparison July 2026
INSE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INSE stands at 206.7M. In comparison, LTRYW has a market cap of 40.6K. Regarding current trading prices, INSE is priced at $7.80, while LTRYW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INSE currently has a P/E ratio of -70.45, whereas LTRYW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INSE's ROE is +1.48%, compared to LTRYW's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, INSE is less volatile compared to LTRYW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INSE.Check LTRYW's competition here
INSE vs GMBLW Comparison July 2026
INSE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INSE stands at 206.7M. In comparison, GMBLW has a market cap of 31.1K. Regarding current trading prices, INSE is priced at $7.80, while GMBLW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INSE currently has a P/E ratio of -70.45, whereas GMBLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INSE's ROE is +1.48%, compared to GMBLW's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, INSE is less volatile compared to GMBLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INSE.Check GMBLW's competition here
INSE vs GMBLZ Comparison July 2026
INSE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INSE stands at 206.7M. In comparison, GMBLZ has a market cap of 1.5K. Regarding current trading prices, INSE is priced at $7.80, while GMBLZ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INSE currently has a P/E ratio of -70.45, whereas GMBLZ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, INSE's ROE is +1.48%, compared to GMBLZ's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, INSE is less volatile compared to GMBLZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INSE.Check GMBLZ's competition here
INSE vs GNOG Comparison July 2026
INSE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INSE stands at 206.7M. In comparison, GNOG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, INSE is priced at $7.80, while GNOG trades at $5.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INSE currently has a P/E ratio of -70.45, whereas GNOG's P/E ratio is -3.90. In terms of profitability, INSE's ROE is +1.48%, compared to GNOG's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, INSE is less volatile compared to GNOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INSE.Check GNOG's competition here
INSE vs PNK Comparison July 2026
INSE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INSE stands at 206.7M. In comparison, PNK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, INSE is priced at $7.80, while PNK trades at $32.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INSE currently has a P/E ratio of -70.45, whereas PNK's P/E ratio is 25.16. In terms of profitability, INSE's ROE is +1.48%, compared to PNK's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, INSE is more volatile compared to PNK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INSE.Check PNK's competition here