Marriott Vacations Worldwide Corporation (VAC) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (VAC) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Gambling, Resorts & Casinos Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VAC | $101.30 | +2.60% | 3.5B | 14.99 | $6.75 | +3.22% |
| LVS | $47.12 | +1.82% | 31.2B | 14.14 | $3.33 | +2.34% |
| FLUT | $104.19 | +8.32% | 18.1B | 13.81 | $7.55 | N/A |
| DKNG | $25.70 | +11.26% | 12.8B | 37.79 | $0.68 | N/A |
| MGM | $49.19 | +4.22% | 12.6B | 15.76 | $3.12 | N/A |
| WYNN | $100.44 | +1.07% | 10.4B | 22.98 | $4.37 | +1.00% |
| LNW | $99.75 | +0.25% | 8.4B | 21.78 | $4.58 | N/A |
| RSI | $31.56 | +3.95% | 7.5B | 75.15 | $0.42 | N/A |
| SGHC | $13.77 | +2.99% | 7B | 28.50 | $0.49 | +3.10% |
| BYD | $89.70 | +1.00% | 6.7B | 12.13 | $7.40 | +0.85% |
Stock Comparison
VAC vs LVS Comparison July 2026
VAC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VAC stands at 3.5B. In comparison, LVS has a market cap of 31.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VAC is priced at $101.30, while LVS trades at $47.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VAC currently has a P/E ratio of 14.99, whereas LVS's P/E ratio is 14.14. In terms of profitability, VAC's ROE is -0.15%, compared to LVS's ROE of +1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, VAC is more volatile compared to LVS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VAC.Check LVS's competition here
VAC vs FLUT Comparison July 2026
VAC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VAC stands at 3.5B. In comparison, FLUT has a market cap of 18.1B. Regarding current trading prices, VAC is priced at $101.30, while FLUT trades at $104.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VAC currently has a P/E ratio of 14.99, whereas FLUT's P/E ratio is 13.81. In terms of profitability, VAC's ROE is -0.15%, compared to FLUT's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, VAC is less volatile compared to FLUT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VAC.Check FLUT's competition here
VAC vs DKNG Comparison July 2026
VAC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VAC stands at 3.5B. In comparison, DKNG has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, VAC is priced at $101.30, while DKNG trades at $25.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VAC currently has a P/E ratio of 14.99, whereas DKNG's P/E ratio is 37.79. In terms of profitability, VAC's ROE is -0.15%, compared to DKNG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, VAC is less volatile compared to DKNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VAC.Check DKNG's competition here
VAC vs MGM Comparison July 2026
VAC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VAC stands at 3.5B. In comparison, MGM has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VAC is priced at $101.30, while MGM trades at $49.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VAC currently has a P/E ratio of 14.99, whereas MGM's P/E ratio is 15.76. In terms of profitability, VAC's ROE is -0.15%, compared to MGM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, VAC is less volatile compared to MGM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VAC.Check MGM's competition here
VAC vs WYNN Comparison July 2026
VAC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VAC stands at 3.5B. In comparison, WYNN has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, VAC is priced at $101.30, while WYNN trades at $100.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VAC currently has a P/E ratio of 14.99, whereas WYNN's P/E ratio is 22.98. In terms of profitability, VAC's ROE is -0.15%, compared to WYNN's ROE of -1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, VAC is more volatile compared to WYNN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VAC.Check WYNN's competition here
VAC vs LNW Comparison July 2026
VAC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VAC stands at 3.5B. In comparison, LNW has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, VAC is priced at $101.30, while LNW trades at $99.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VAC currently has a P/E ratio of 14.99, whereas LNW's P/E ratio is 21.78. In terms of profitability, VAC's ROE is -0.15%, compared to LNW's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, VAC is more volatile compared to LNW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VAC.Check LNW's competition here
VAC vs RSI Comparison July 2026
VAC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VAC stands at 3.5B. In comparison, RSI has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VAC is priced at $101.30, while RSI trades at $31.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VAC currently has a P/E ratio of 14.99, whereas RSI's P/E ratio is 75.15. In terms of profitability, VAC's ROE is -0.15%, compared to RSI's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, VAC is less volatile compared to RSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VAC.Check RSI's competition here
VAC vs SGHC Comparison July 2026
VAC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VAC stands at 3.5B. In comparison, SGHC has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, VAC is priced at $101.30, while SGHC trades at $13.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VAC currently has a P/E ratio of 14.99, whereas SGHC's P/E ratio is 28.50. In terms of profitability, VAC's ROE is -0.15%, compared to SGHC's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, VAC is less volatile compared to SGHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VAC.Check SGHC's competition here
VAC vs BYD Comparison July 2026
VAC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VAC stands at 3.5B. In comparison, BYD has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, VAC is priced at $101.30, while BYD trades at $89.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VAC currently has a P/E ratio of 14.99, whereas BYD's P/E ratio is 12.13. In terms of profitability, VAC's ROE is -0.15%, compared to BYD's ROE of +0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, VAC is more volatile compared to BYD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VAC.Check BYD's competition here
VAC vs CHDN Comparison July 2026
VAC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VAC stands at 3.5B. In comparison, CHDN has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VAC is priced at $101.30, while CHDN trades at $88.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VAC currently has a P/E ratio of 14.99, whereas CHDN's P/E ratio is 13.96. In terms of profitability, VAC's ROE is -0.15%, compared to CHDN's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, VAC is less volatile compared to CHDN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VAC.Check CHDN's competition here
VAC vs CZR Comparison July 2026
VAC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VAC stands at 3.5B. In comparison, CZR has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, VAC is priced at $101.30, while CZR trades at $30.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VAC currently has a P/E ratio of 14.99, whereas CZR's P/E ratio is -12.74. In terms of profitability, VAC's ROE is -0.15%, compared to CZR's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, VAC is more volatile compared to CZR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VAC.Check CZR's competition here
VAC vs SGMS Comparison July 2026
VAC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VAC stands at 3.5B. In comparison, SGMS has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, VAC is priced at $101.30, while SGMS trades at $58.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VAC currently has a P/E ratio of 14.99, whereas SGMS's P/E ratio is 30.71. In terms of profitability, VAC's ROE is -0.15%, compared to SGMS's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, VAC is less volatile compared to SGMS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VAC.Check SGMS's competition here
VAC vs MTN Comparison July 2026
VAC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VAC stands at 3.5B. In comparison, MTN has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, VAC is priced at $101.30, while MTN trades at $137.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VAC currently has a P/E ratio of 14.99, whereas MTN's P/E ratio is 31.35. In terms of profitability, VAC's ROE is -0.15%, compared to MTN's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, VAC is less volatile compared to MTN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VAC.Check MTN's competition here
VAC vs RRR Comparison July 2026
VAC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VAC stands at 3.5B. In comparison, RRR has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, VAC is priced at $101.30, while RRR trades at $67.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VAC currently has a P/E ratio of 14.99, whereas RRR's P/E ratio is 21.63. In terms of profitability, VAC's ROE is -0.15%, compared to RRR's ROE of +0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, VAC is less volatile compared to RRR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VAC.Check RRR's competition here
VAC vs IGT Comparison July 2026
VAC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VAC stands at 3.5B. In comparison, IGT has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, VAC is priced at $101.30, while IGT trades at $16.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VAC currently has a P/E ratio of 14.99, whereas IGT's P/E ratio is 148.09. In terms of profitability, VAC's ROE is -0.15%, compared to IGT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, VAC is less volatile compared to IGT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VAC.Check IGT's competition here
VAC vs PENN Comparison July 2026
VAC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VAC stands at 3.5B. In comparison, PENN has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, VAC is priced at $101.30, while PENN trades at $21.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VAC currently has a P/E ratio of 14.99, whereas PENN's P/E ratio is 365.00. In terms of profitability, VAC's ROE is -0.15%, compared to PENN's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, VAC is less volatile compared to PENN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VAC.Check PENN's competition here
VAC vs MCRI Comparison July 2026
VAC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VAC stands at 3.5B. In comparison, MCRI has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, VAC is priced at $101.30, while MCRI trades at $133.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VAC currently has a P/E ratio of 14.99, whereas MCRI's P/E ratio is 22.69. In terms of profitability, VAC's ROE is -0.15%, compared to MCRI's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, VAC is more volatile compared to MCRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VAC.Check MCRI's competition here
VAC vs MLCO Comparison July 2026
VAC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VAC stands at 3.5B. In comparison, MLCO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, VAC is priced at $101.30, while MLCO trades at $5.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VAC currently has a P/E ratio of 14.99, whereas MLCO's P/E ratio is 6.78. In terms of profitability, VAC's ROE is -0.15%, compared to MLCO's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, VAC is more volatile compared to MLCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VAC.Check MLCO's competition here
VAC vs BRSL Comparison July 2026
VAC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VAC stands at 3.5B. In comparison, BRSL has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, VAC is priced at $101.30, while BRSL trades at $11.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VAC currently has a P/E ratio of 14.99, whereas BRSL's P/E ratio is 11.42. In terms of profitability, VAC's ROE is -0.15%, compared to BRSL's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, VAC is more volatile compared to BRSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VAC.Check BRSL's competition here
VAC vs PLYA Comparison July 2026
VAC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VAC stands at 3.5B. In comparison, PLYA has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, VAC is priced at $101.30, while PLYA trades at $13.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VAC currently has a P/E ratio of 14.99, whereas PLYA's P/E ratio is 26.43. In terms of profitability, VAC's ROE is -0.15%, compared to PLYA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, VAC is more volatile compared to PLYA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VAC.Check PLYA's competition here
VAC vs EVRI Comparison July 2026
VAC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VAC stands at 3.5B. In comparison, EVRI has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VAC is priced at $101.30, while EVRI trades at $14.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VAC currently has a P/E ratio of 14.99, whereas EVRI's P/E ratio is 89.00. In terms of profitability, VAC's ROE is -0.15%, compared to EVRI's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, VAC is more volatile compared to EVRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VAC.Check EVRI's competition here
VAC vs ACEL Comparison July 2026
VAC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VAC stands at 3.5B. In comparison, ACEL has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, VAC is priced at $101.30, while ACEL trades at $13.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VAC currently has a P/E ratio of 14.99, whereas ACEL's P/E ratio is 15.65. In terms of profitability, VAC's ROE is -0.15%, compared to ACEL's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, VAC is more volatile compared to ACEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VAC.Check ACEL's competition here
VAC vs BVH Comparison July 2026
VAC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VAC stands at 3.5B. In comparison, BVH has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, VAC is priced at $101.30, while BVH trades at $75.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VAC currently has a P/E ratio of 14.99, whereas BVH's P/E ratio is 20.05. In terms of profitability, VAC's ROE is -0.15%, compared to BVH's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, VAC is more volatile compared to BVH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VAC.Check BVH's competition here
VAC vs NGMS Comparison July 2026
VAC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VAC stands at 3.5B. In comparison, NGMS has a market cap of 998.2M. Regarding current trading prices, VAC is priced at $101.30, while NGMS trades at $29.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VAC currently has a P/E ratio of 14.99, whereas NGMS's P/E ratio is -81.81. In terms of profitability, VAC's ROE is -0.15%, compared to NGMS's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, VAC is more volatile compared to NGMS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VAC.Check NGMS's competition here
VAC vs FBYDP Comparison July 2026
VAC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VAC stands at 3.5B. In comparison, FBYDP has a market cap of 770.6M. Regarding current trading prices, VAC is priced at $101.30, while FBYDP trades at $14.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VAC currently has a P/E ratio of 14.99, whereas FBYDP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VAC's ROE is -0.15%, compared to FBYDP's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, VAC is less volatile compared to FBYDP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VAC.Check FBYDP's competition here
VAC vs GDEN Comparison July 2026
VAC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VAC stands at 3.5B. In comparison, GDEN has a market cap of 753.7M. Regarding current trading prices, VAC is priced at $101.30, while GDEN trades at $28.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VAC currently has a P/E ratio of 14.99, whereas GDEN's P/E ratio is -124.13. In terms of profitability, VAC's ROE is -0.15%, compared to GDEN's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, VAC is more volatile compared to GDEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VAC.Check GDEN's competition here
VAC vs BALY Comparison July 2026
VAC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VAC stands at 3.5B. In comparison, BALY has a market cap of 728.4M. Regarding current trading prices, VAC is priced at $101.30, while BALY trades at $14.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VAC currently has a P/E ratio of 14.99, whereas BALY's P/E ratio is -1.71. In terms of profitability, VAC's ROE is -0.15%, compared to BALY's ROE of -1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, VAC is less volatile compared to BALY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VAC.Check BALY's competition here
VAC vs TPGH-UN Comparison July 2026
VAC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VAC stands at 3.5B. In comparison, TPGH-UN has a market cap of 580.3M. Regarding current trading prices, VAC is priced at $101.30, while TPGH-UN trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VAC currently has a P/E ratio of 14.99, whereas TPGH-UN's P/E ratio is -1000.00. In terms of profitability, VAC's ROE is -0.15%, compared to TPGH-UN's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, VAC is more volatile compared to TPGH-UN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VAC.Check TPGH-UN's competition here
VAC vs AGS Comparison July 2026
VAC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VAC stands at 3.5B. In comparison, AGS has a market cap of 518.4M. Regarding current trading prices, VAC is priced at $101.30, while AGS trades at $12.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VAC currently has a P/E ratio of 14.99, whereas AGS's P/E ratio is 10.77. In terms of profitability, VAC's ROE is -0.15%, compared to AGS's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, VAC is more volatile compared to AGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VAC.Check AGS's competition here
VAC vs CDRO Comparison July 2026
VAC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VAC stands at 3.5B. In comparison, CDRO has a market cap of 438.3M. Regarding current trading prices, VAC is priced at $101.30, while CDRO trades at $9.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VAC currently has a P/E ratio of 14.99, whereas CDRO's P/E ratio is 48.44. In terms of profitability, VAC's ROE is -0.15%, compared to CDRO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, VAC is more volatile compared to CDRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VAC.Check CDRO's competition here
VAC vs CDROW Comparison July 2026
VAC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VAC stands at 3.5B. In comparison, CDROW has a market cap of 412M. Regarding current trading prices, VAC is priced at $101.30, while CDROW trades at $0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VAC currently has a P/E ratio of 14.99, whereas CDROW's P/E ratio is 4.90. In terms of profitability, VAC's ROE is -0.15%, compared to CDROW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, VAC is more volatile compared to CDROW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VAC.Check CDROW's competition here
VAC vs INSE Comparison July 2026
VAC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VAC stands at 3.5B. In comparison, INSE has a market cap of 216.9M. Regarding current trading prices, VAC is priced at $101.30, while INSE trades at $8.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VAC currently has a P/E ratio of 14.99, whereas INSE's P/E ratio is -73.91. In terms of profitability, VAC's ROE is -0.15%, compared to INSE's ROE of +1.48%. Regarding short-term risk, VAC is less volatile compared to INSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VAC.Check INSE's competition here
VAC vs FLL Comparison July 2026
VAC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VAC stands at 3.5B. In comparison, FLL has a market cap of 101.2M. Regarding current trading prices, VAC is priced at $101.30, while FLL trades at $2.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VAC currently has a P/E ratio of 14.99, whereas FLL's P/E ratio is -2.61. In terms of profitability, VAC's ROE is -0.15%, compared to FLL's ROE of -4.73%. Regarding short-term risk, VAC is less volatile compared to FLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VAC.Check FLL's competition here
VAC vs GAN Comparison July 2026
VAC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VAC stands at 3.5B. In comparison, GAN has a market cap of 91.5M. Regarding current trading prices, VAC is priced at $101.30, while GAN trades at $1.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VAC currently has a P/E ratio of 14.99, whereas GAN's P/E ratio is -8.21. In terms of profitability, VAC's ROE is -0.15%, compared to GAN's ROE of +0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, VAC is more volatile compared to GAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VAC.Check GAN's competition here
VAC vs MSC Comparison July 2026
VAC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VAC stands at 3.5B. In comparison, MSC has a market cap of 88.1M. Regarding current trading prices, VAC is priced at $101.30, while MSC trades at $1.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VAC currently has a P/E ratio of 14.99, whereas MSC's P/E ratio is -8.32. In terms of profitability, VAC's ROE is -0.15%, compared to MSC's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, VAC is less volatile compared to MSC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VAC.Check MSC's competition here
VAC vs CPHC Comparison July 2026
VAC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VAC stands at 3.5B. In comparison, CPHC has a market cap of 86.7M. Regarding current trading prices, VAC is priced at $101.30, while CPHC trades at $16.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VAC currently has a P/E ratio of 14.99, whereas CPHC's P/E ratio is -1684.00. In terms of profitability, VAC's ROE is -0.15%, compared to CPHC's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, VAC is less volatile compared to CPHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VAC.Check CPHC's competition here
VAC vs CNTY Comparison July 2026
VAC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VAC stands at 3.5B. In comparison, CNTY has a market cap of 37.4M. Regarding current trading prices, VAC is priced at $101.30, while CNTY trades at $1.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VAC currently has a P/E ratio of 14.99, whereas CNTY's P/E ratio is -0.69. In terms of profitability, VAC's ROE is -0.15%, compared to CNTY's ROE of +0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, VAC is more volatile compared to CNTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VAC.Check CNTY's competition here
VAC vs LTRY Comparison July 2026
VAC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VAC stands at 3.5B. In comparison, LTRY has a market cap of 36.6M. Regarding current trading prices, VAC is priced at $101.30, while LTRY trades at $1.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VAC currently has a P/E ratio of 14.99, whereas LTRY's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, VAC's ROE is -0.15%, compared to LTRY's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, VAC is less volatile compared to LTRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VAC.Check LTRY's competition here
VAC vs SLNA Comparison July 2026
VAC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VAC stands at 3.5B. In comparison, SLNA has a market cap of 16.3M. Regarding current trading prices, VAC is priced at $101.30, while SLNA trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VAC currently has a P/E ratio of 14.99, whereas SLNA's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, VAC's ROE is -0.15%, compared to SLNA's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, VAC is less volatile compared to SLNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VAC.Check SLNA's competition here
VAC vs SEGG Comparison July 2026
VAC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VAC stands at 3.5B. In comparison, SEGG has a market cap of 11.5M. Regarding current trading prices, VAC is priced at $101.30, while SEGG trades at $0.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VAC currently has a P/E ratio of 14.99, whereas SEGG's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, VAC's ROE is -0.15%, compared to SEGG's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, VAC is less volatile compared to SEGG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VAC.Check SEGG's competition here
VAC vs SLNAW Comparison July 2026
VAC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VAC stands at 3.5B. In comparison, SLNAW has a market cap of 526.4K. Regarding current trading prices, VAC is priced at $101.30, while SLNAW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VAC currently has a P/E ratio of 14.99, whereas SLNAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VAC's ROE is -0.15%, compared to SLNAW's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, VAC is less volatile compared to SLNAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VAC.Check SLNAW's competition here
VAC vs LTRYW Comparison July 2026
VAC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VAC stands at 3.5B. In comparison, LTRYW has a market cap of 39.4K. Regarding current trading prices, VAC is priced at $101.30, while LTRYW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VAC currently has a P/E ratio of 14.99, whereas LTRYW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VAC's ROE is -0.15%, compared to LTRYW's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, VAC is less volatile compared to LTRYW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VAC.Check LTRYW's competition here
VAC vs GMBLW Comparison July 2026
VAC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VAC stands at 3.5B. In comparison, GMBLW has a market cap of 31.1K. Regarding current trading prices, VAC is priced at $101.30, while GMBLW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VAC currently has a P/E ratio of 14.99, whereas GMBLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VAC's ROE is -0.15%, compared to GMBLW's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, VAC is less volatile compared to GMBLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VAC.Check GMBLW's competition here
VAC vs GMBLZ Comparison July 2026
VAC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VAC stands at 3.5B. In comparison, GMBLZ has a market cap of 1.5K. Regarding current trading prices, VAC is priced at $101.30, while GMBLZ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VAC currently has a P/E ratio of 14.99, whereas GMBLZ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, VAC's ROE is -0.15%, compared to GMBLZ's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, VAC is less volatile compared to GMBLZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VAC.Check GMBLZ's competition here
VAC vs GNOG Comparison July 2026
VAC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VAC stands at 3.5B. In comparison, GNOG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, VAC is priced at $101.30, while GNOG trades at $5.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VAC currently has a P/E ratio of 14.99, whereas GNOG's P/E ratio is -3.90. In terms of profitability, VAC's ROE is -0.15%, compared to GNOG's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, VAC is less volatile compared to GNOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VAC.Check GNOG's competition here
VAC vs PNK Comparison July 2026
VAC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VAC stands at 3.5B. In comparison, PNK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, VAC is priced at $101.30, while PNK trades at $32.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VAC currently has a P/E ratio of 14.99, whereas PNK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VAC's ROE is -0.15%, compared to PNK's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, VAC is more volatile compared to PNK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VAC.Check PNK's competition here