International Game Technology PLC (IGT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (IGT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Gambling, Resorts & Casinos Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IGT | $16.29 | +3.07% | 3.3B | 148.09 | $0.11 | +2.46% |
| LVS | $47.12 | +1.82% | 31.2B | 14.14 | $3.33 | +2.34% |
| FLUT | $104.19 | +8.32% | 18.1B | 13.81 | $7.55 | N/A |
| DKNG | $25.70 | +11.26% | 12.8B | 37.79 | $0.68 | N/A |
| MGM | $49.19 | +4.22% | 12.6B | 15.76 | $3.12 | N/A |
| WYNN | $100.44 | +1.07% | 10.4B | 22.98 | $4.37 | +1.00% |
| LNW | $99.75 | +0.25% | 8.4B | 21.78 | $4.58 | N/A |
| RSI | $31.56 | +3.95% | 7.5B | 75.15 | $0.42 | N/A |
| SGHC | $13.77 | +2.99% | 7B | 28.50 | $0.49 | +3.10% |
| BYD | $89.70 | +1.00% | 6.7B | 12.13 | $7.40 | +0.85% |
Stock Comparison
IGT vs LVS Comparison July 2026
IGT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IGT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, LVS has a market cap of 31.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IGT is priced at $16.29, while LVS trades at $47.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IGT currently has a P/E ratio of 148.09, whereas LVS's P/E ratio is 14.14. In terms of profitability, IGT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LVS's ROE of +1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IGT is more volatile compared to LVS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IGT.Check LVS's competition here
IGT vs FLUT Comparison July 2026
IGT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IGT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, FLUT has a market cap of 18.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IGT is priced at $16.29, while FLUT trades at $104.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IGT currently has a P/E ratio of 148.09, whereas FLUT's P/E ratio is 13.81. In terms of profitability, IGT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FLUT's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IGT is less volatile compared to FLUT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IGT.Check FLUT's competition here
IGT vs DKNG Comparison July 2026
IGT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IGT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, DKNG has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IGT is priced at $16.29, while DKNG trades at $25.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IGT currently has a P/E ratio of 148.09, whereas DKNG's P/E ratio is 37.79. In terms of profitability, IGT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DKNG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IGT is less volatile compared to DKNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IGT.Check DKNG's competition here
IGT vs MGM Comparison July 2026
IGT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IGT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, MGM has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IGT is priced at $16.29, while MGM trades at $49.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IGT currently has a P/E ratio of 148.09, whereas MGM's P/E ratio is 15.76. In terms of profitability, IGT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MGM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IGT is more volatile compared to MGM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IGT.Check MGM's competition here
IGT vs WYNN Comparison July 2026
IGT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IGT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, WYNN has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IGT is priced at $16.29, while WYNN trades at $100.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IGT currently has a P/E ratio of 148.09, whereas WYNN's P/E ratio is 22.98. In terms of profitability, IGT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WYNN's ROE of -1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IGT is more volatile compared to WYNN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IGT.Check WYNN's competition here
IGT vs LNW Comparison July 2026
IGT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IGT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, LNW has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IGT is priced at $16.29, while LNW trades at $99.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IGT currently has a P/E ratio of 148.09, whereas LNW's P/E ratio is 21.78. In terms of profitability, IGT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LNW's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, IGT is more volatile compared to LNW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IGT.Check LNW's competition here
IGT vs RSI Comparison July 2026
IGT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IGT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, RSI has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IGT is priced at $16.29, while RSI trades at $31.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IGT currently has a P/E ratio of 148.09, whereas RSI's P/E ratio is 75.15. In terms of profitability, IGT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RSI's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, IGT is more volatile compared to RSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IGT.Check RSI's competition here
IGT vs SGHC Comparison July 2026
IGT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IGT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, SGHC has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, IGT is priced at $16.29, while SGHC trades at $13.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IGT currently has a P/E ratio of 148.09, whereas SGHC's P/E ratio is 28.50. In terms of profitability, IGT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SGHC's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, IGT is more volatile compared to SGHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IGT.Check SGHC's competition here
IGT vs BYD Comparison July 2026
IGT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IGT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, BYD has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IGT is priced at $16.29, while BYD trades at $89.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IGT currently has a P/E ratio of 148.09, whereas BYD's P/E ratio is 12.13. In terms of profitability, IGT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BYD's ROE of +0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, IGT is more volatile compared to BYD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IGT.Check BYD's competition here
IGT vs CHDN Comparison July 2026
IGT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IGT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, CHDN has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IGT is priced at $16.29, while CHDN trades at $88.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IGT currently has a P/E ratio of 148.09, whereas CHDN's P/E ratio is 13.96. In terms of profitability, IGT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CHDN's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, IGT is more volatile compared to CHDN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IGT.Check CHDN's competition here
IGT vs CZR Comparison July 2026
IGT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IGT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, CZR has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IGT is priced at $16.29, while CZR trades at $30.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IGT currently has a P/E ratio of 148.09, whereas CZR's P/E ratio is -12.74. In terms of profitability, IGT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CZR's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IGT is more volatile compared to CZR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IGT.Check CZR's competition here
IGT vs SGMS Comparison July 2026
IGT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IGT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, SGMS has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IGT is priced at $16.29, while SGMS trades at $58.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IGT currently has a P/E ratio of 148.09, whereas SGMS's P/E ratio is 30.71. In terms of profitability, IGT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SGMS's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, IGT is more volatile compared to SGMS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IGT.Check SGMS's competition here
IGT vs MTN Comparison July 2026
IGT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IGT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, MTN has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IGT is priced at $16.29, while MTN trades at $137.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IGT currently has a P/E ratio of 148.09, whereas MTN's P/E ratio is 31.35. In terms of profitability, IGT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MTN's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, IGT is more volatile compared to MTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IGT.Check MTN's competition here
IGT vs RRR Comparison July 2026
IGT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IGT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, RRR has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IGT is priced at $16.29, while RRR trades at $67.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IGT currently has a P/E ratio of 148.09, whereas RRR's P/E ratio is 21.63. In terms of profitability, IGT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RRR's ROE of +0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, IGT is more volatile compared to RRR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IGT.Check RRR's competition here
IGT vs VAC Comparison July 2026
IGT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IGT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, VAC has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IGT is priced at $16.29, while VAC trades at $101.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IGT currently has a P/E ratio of 148.09, whereas VAC's P/E ratio is 14.99. In terms of profitability, IGT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VAC's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IGT is more volatile compared to VAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IGT.Check VAC's competition here
IGT vs PENN Comparison July 2026
IGT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IGT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, PENN has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IGT is priced at $16.29, while PENN trades at $21.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IGT currently has a P/E ratio of 148.09, whereas PENN's P/E ratio is 365.00. In terms of profitability, IGT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PENN's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, IGT is more volatile compared to PENN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IGT.Check PENN's competition here
IGT vs MCRI Comparison July 2026
IGT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IGT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, MCRI has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IGT is priced at $16.29, while MCRI trades at $133.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IGT currently has a P/E ratio of 148.09, whereas MCRI's P/E ratio is 22.69. In terms of profitability, IGT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MCRI's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, IGT is more volatile compared to MCRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IGT.Check MCRI's competition here
IGT vs MLCO Comparison July 2026
IGT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IGT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, MLCO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IGT is priced at $16.29, while MLCO trades at $5.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IGT currently has a P/E ratio of 148.09, whereas MLCO's P/E ratio is 6.78. In terms of profitability, IGT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MLCO's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, IGT is more volatile compared to MLCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IGT.Check MLCO's competition here
IGT vs BRSL Comparison July 2026
IGT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IGT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, BRSL has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IGT is priced at $16.29, while BRSL trades at $11.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IGT currently has a P/E ratio of 148.09, whereas BRSL's P/E ratio is 11.42. In terms of profitability, IGT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BRSL's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IGT is more volatile compared to BRSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IGT.Check BRSL's competition here
IGT vs PLYA Comparison July 2026
IGT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IGT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, PLYA has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IGT is priced at $16.29, while PLYA trades at $13.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IGT currently has a P/E ratio of 148.09, whereas PLYA's P/E ratio is 26.43. In terms of profitability, IGT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PLYA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IGT is more volatile compared to PLYA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IGT.Check PLYA's competition here
IGT vs EVRI Comparison July 2026
IGT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IGT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, EVRI has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IGT is priced at $16.29, while EVRI trades at $14.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IGT currently has a P/E ratio of 148.09, whereas EVRI's P/E ratio is 89.00. In terms of profitability, IGT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EVRI's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IGT is more volatile compared to EVRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IGT.Check EVRI's competition here
IGT vs ACEL Comparison July 2026
IGT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IGT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, ACEL has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IGT is priced at $16.29, while ACEL trades at $13.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IGT currently has a P/E ratio of 148.09, whereas ACEL's P/E ratio is 15.65. In terms of profitability, IGT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ACEL's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, IGT is more volatile compared to ACEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IGT.Check ACEL's competition here
IGT vs BVH Comparison July 2026
IGT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IGT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, BVH has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, IGT is priced at $16.29, while BVH trades at $75.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IGT currently has a P/E ratio of 148.09, whereas BVH's P/E ratio is 20.05. In terms of profitability, IGT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BVH's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, IGT is more volatile compared to BVH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IGT.Check BVH's competition here
IGT vs NGMS Comparison July 2026
IGT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IGT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, NGMS has a market cap of 998.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IGT is priced at $16.29, while NGMS trades at $29.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IGT currently has a P/E ratio of 148.09, whereas NGMS's P/E ratio is -81.81. In terms of profitability, IGT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NGMS's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IGT is more volatile compared to NGMS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IGT.Check NGMS's competition here
IGT vs FBYDP Comparison July 2026
IGT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IGT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, FBYDP has a market cap of 770.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IGT is priced at $16.29, while FBYDP trades at $14.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IGT currently has a P/E ratio of 148.09, whereas FBYDP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IGT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FBYDP's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IGT is less volatile compared to FBYDP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IGT.Check FBYDP's competition here
IGT vs GDEN Comparison July 2026
IGT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IGT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, GDEN has a market cap of 753.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IGT is priced at $16.29, while GDEN trades at $28.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IGT currently has a P/E ratio of 148.09, whereas GDEN's P/E ratio is -124.13. In terms of profitability, IGT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GDEN's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IGT is more volatile compared to GDEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IGT.Check GDEN's competition here
IGT vs BALY Comparison July 2026
IGT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IGT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, BALY has a market cap of 728.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IGT is priced at $16.29, while BALY trades at $14.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IGT currently has a P/E ratio of 148.09, whereas BALY's P/E ratio is -1.71. In terms of profitability, IGT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BALY's ROE of -1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IGT is more volatile compared to BALY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IGT.Check BALY's competition here
IGT vs TPGH-UN Comparison July 2026
IGT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IGT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, TPGH-UN has a market cap of 580.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IGT is priced at $16.29, while TPGH-UN trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IGT currently has a P/E ratio of 148.09, whereas TPGH-UN's P/E ratio is -1000.00. In terms of profitability, IGT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TPGH-UN's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, IGT is more volatile compared to TPGH-UN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IGT.Check TPGH-UN's competition here
IGT vs AGS Comparison July 2026
IGT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IGT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, AGS has a market cap of 518.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IGT is priced at $16.29, while AGS trades at $12.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IGT currently has a P/E ratio of 148.09, whereas AGS's P/E ratio is 10.77. In terms of profitability, IGT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AGS's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, IGT is more volatile compared to AGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IGT.Check AGS's competition here
IGT vs CDRO Comparison July 2026
IGT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IGT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, CDRO has a market cap of 438.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IGT is priced at $16.29, while CDRO trades at $9.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IGT currently has a P/E ratio of 148.09, whereas CDRO's P/E ratio is 48.44. In terms of profitability, IGT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CDRO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IGT is more volatile compared to CDRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IGT.Check CDRO's competition here
IGT vs CDROW Comparison July 2026
IGT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IGT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, CDROW has a market cap of 412M. Regarding current trading prices, IGT is priced at $16.29, while CDROW trades at $0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IGT currently has a P/E ratio of 148.09, whereas CDROW's P/E ratio is 4.90. In terms of profitability, IGT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CDROW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IGT is more volatile compared to CDROW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IGT.Check CDROW's competition here
IGT vs INSE Comparison July 2026
IGT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IGT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, INSE has a market cap of 216.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IGT is priced at $16.29, while INSE trades at $8.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IGT currently has a P/E ratio of 148.09, whereas INSE's P/E ratio is -73.91. In terms of profitability, IGT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to INSE's ROE of +1.48%. Regarding short-term risk, IGT is more volatile compared to INSE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IGT.Check INSE's competition here
IGT vs FLL Comparison July 2026
IGT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IGT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, FLL has a market cap of 101.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IGT is priced at $16.29, while FLL trades at $2.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IGT currently has a P/E ratio of 148.09, whereas FLL's P/E ratio is -2.61. In terms of profitability, IGT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FLL's ROE of -4.73%. Regarding short-term risk, IGT is more volatile compared to FLL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IGT.Check FLL's competition here
IGT vs GAN Comparison July 2026
IGT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IGT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, GAN has a market cap of 91.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IGT is priced at $16.29, while GAN trades at $1.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IGT currently has a P/E ratio of 148.09, whereas GAN's P/E ratio is -8.21. In terms of profitability, IGT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GAN's ROE of +0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, IGT is more volatile compared to GAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IGT.Check GAN's competition here
IGT vs MSC Comparison July 2026
IGT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IGT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, MSC has a market cap of 88.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IGT is priced at $16.29, while MSC trades at $1.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IGT currently has a P/E ratio of 148.09, whereas MSC's P/E ratio is -8.32. In terms of profitability, IGT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MSC's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IGT is more volatile compared to MSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IGT.Check MSC's competition here
IGT vs CPHC Comparison July 2026
IGT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IGT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, CPHC has a market cap of 86.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IGT is priced at $16.29, while CPHC trades at $16.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IGT currently has a P/E ratio of 148.09, whereas CPHC's P/E ratio is -1684.00. In terms of profitability, IGT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CPHC's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IGT is more volatile compared to CPHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IGT.Check CPHC's competition here
IGT vs CNTY Comparison July 2026
IGT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IGT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, CNTY has a market cap of 37.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IGT is priced at $16.29, while CNTY trades at $1.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IGT currently has a P/E ratio of 148.09, whereas CNTY's P/E ratio is -0.69. In terms of profitability, IGT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CNTY's ROE of +0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, IGT is more volatile compared to CNTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IGT.Check CNTY's competition here
IGT vs LTRY Comparison July 2026
IGT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IGT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, LTRY has a market cap of 36.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IGT is priced at $16.29, while LTRY trades at $1.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IGT currently has a P/E ratio of 148.09, whereas LTRY's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, IGT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LTRY's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, IGT is less volatile compared to LTRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IGT.Check LTRY's competition here
IGT vs SLNA Comparison July 2026
IGT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IGT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, SLNA has a market cap of 16.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IGT is priced at $16.29, while SLNA trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IGT currently has a P/E ratio of 148.09, whereas SLNA's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, IGT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SLNA's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, IGT is less volatile compared to SLNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IGT.Check SLNA's competition here
IGT vs SEGG Comparison July 2026
IGT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IGT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, SEGG has a market cap of 11.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IGT is priced at $16.29, while SEGG trades at $0.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IGT currently has a P/E ratio of 148.09, whereas SEGG's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, IGT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SEGG's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, IGT is less volatile compared to SEGG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IGT.Check SEGG's competition here
IGT vs SLNAW Comparison July 2026
IGT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IGT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, SLNAW has a market cap of 526.4K. Regarding current trading prices, IGT is priced at $16.29, while SLNAW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IGT currently has a P/E ratio of 148.09, whereas SLNAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IGT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SLNAW's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, IGT is less volatile compared to SLNAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IGT.Check SLNAW's competition here
IGT vs LTRYW Comparison July 2026
IGT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IGT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, LTRYW has a market cap of 39.4K. Regarding current trading prices, IGT is priced at $16.29, while LTRYW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IGT currently has a P/E ratio of 148.09, whereas LTRYW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IGT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LTRYW's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, IGT is more volatile compared to LTRYW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IGT.Check LTRYW's competition here
IGT vs GMBLW Comparison July 2026
IGT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IGT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, GMBLW has a market cap of 31.1K. Regarding current trading prices, IGT is priced at $16.29, while GMBLW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IGT currently has a P/E ratio of 148.09, whereas GMBLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IGT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GMBLW's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, IGT is less volatile compared to GMBLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IGT.Check GMBLW's competition here
IGT vs GMBLZ Comparison July 2026
IGT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IGT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, GMBLZ has a market cap of 1.5K. Regarding current trading prices, IGT is priced at $16.29, while GMBLZ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IGT currently has a P/E ratio of 148.09, whereas GMBLZ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, IGT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GMBLZ's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, IGT is less volatile compared to GMBLZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IGT.Check GMBLZ's competition here
IGT vs GNOG Comparison July 2026
IGT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IGT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, GNOG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IGT is priced at $16.29, while GNOG trades at $5.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IGT currently has a P/E ratio of 148.09, whereas GNOG's P/E ratio is -3.90. In terms of profitability, IGT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GNOG's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IGT is less volatile compared to GNOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IGT.Check GNOG's competition here
IGT vs PNK Comparison July 2026
IGT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IGT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, PNK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IGT is priced at $16.29, while PNK trades at $32.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IGT currently has a P/E ratio of 148.09, whereas PNK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IGT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PNK's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, IGT is more volatile compared to PNK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IGT.Check PNK's competition here