International Game Technology PLC
International Game Technology PLC (IGT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (IGT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Gambling, Resorts & Casinos Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IGT | $16.29 | +3.07% | 3.3B | 148.09 | $0.11 | +2.46% |
| LVS | $52.81 | +1.66% | 35.1B | 19.49 | $2.71 | +2.00% |
| FLUT | $111.57 | +5.21% | 19.6B | -63.77 | -$1.75 | N/A |
| DKNG | $23.18 | +4.56% | 11.5B | -2318.00 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| WYNN | $105.67 | +0.06% | 11B | 33.65 | $3.14 | +0.94% |
| MGM | $39.54 | +1.54% | 10.8B | 52.05 | $0.76 | N/A |
| LNW | $99.75 | +0.25% | 8.4B | 21.78 | $4.58 | N/A |
| CHDN | $101.55 | +3.72% | 7.1B | 18.70 | $5.43 | +0.43% |
| SGHC | $12.53 | +2.29% | 6.4B | 29.14 | $0.43 | +3.34% |
| BYD | $83.88 | -5.91% | 6.3B | 3.71 | $22.62 | +0.89% |
Stock Comparison
IGT vs LVS Comparison April 2026
IGT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IGT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, LVS has a market cap of 35.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IGT is priced at $16.29, while LVS trades at $52.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IGT currently has a P/E ratio of 148.09, whereas LVS's P/E ratio is 19.49. In terms of profitability, IGT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LVS's ROE of +0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, IGT is more volatile compared to LVS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IGT.Check LVS's competition here
IGT vs FLUT Comparison April 2026
IGT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IGT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, FLUT has a market cap of 19.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IGT is priced at $16.29, while FLUT trades at $111.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IGT currently has a P/E ratio of 148.09, whereas FLUT's P/E ratio is -63.77. In terms of profitability, IGT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FLUT's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IGT is more volatile compared to FLUT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IGT.Check FLUT's competition here
IGT vs DKNG Comparison April 2026
IGT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IGT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, DKNG has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IGT is priced at $16.29, while DKNG trades at $23.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IGT currently has a P/E ratio of 148.09, whereas DKNG's P/E ratio is -2318.00. In terms of profitability, IGT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DKNG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IGT is less volatile compared to DKNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IGT.Check DKNG's competition here
IGT vs WYNN Comparison April 2026
IGT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IGT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, WYNN has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, IGT is priced at $16.29, while WYNN trades at $105.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IGT currently has a P/E ratio of 148.09, whereas WYNN's P/E ratio is 33.65. In terms of profitability, IGT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WYNN's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, IGT is more volatile compared to WYNN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IGT.Check WYNN's competition here
IGT vs MGM Comparison April 2026
IGT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IGT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, MGM has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IGT is priced at $16.29, while MGM trades at $39.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IGT currently has a P/E ratio of 148.09, whereas MGM's P/E ratio is 52.05. In terms of profitability, IGT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MGM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IGT is more volatile compared to MGM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IGT.Check MGM's competition here
IGT vs LNW Comparison April 2026
IGT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IGT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, LNW has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IGT is priced at $16.29, while LNW trades at $99.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IGT currently has a P/E ratio of 148.09, whereas LNW's P/E ratio is 21.78. In terms of profitability, IGT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LNW's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, IGT is more volatile compared to LNW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IGT.Check LNW's competition here
IGT vs CHDN Comparison April 2026
IGT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IGT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, CHDN has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IGT is priced at $16.29, while CHDN trades at $101.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IGT currently has a P/E ratio of 148.09, whereas CHDN's P/E ratio is 18.70. In terms of profitability, IGT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CHDN's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, IGT is more volatile compared to CHDN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IGT.Check CHDN's competition here
IGT vs SGHC Comparison April 2026
IGT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IGT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, SGHC has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IGT is priced at $16.29, while SGHC trades at $12.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IGT currently has a P/E ratio of 148.09, whereas SGHC's P/E ratio is 29.14. In terms of profitability, IGT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SGHC's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, IGT is more volatile compared to SGHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IGT.Check SGHC's competition here
IGT vs BYD Comparison April 2026
IGT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IGT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, BYD has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IGT is priced at $16.29, while BYD trades at $83.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IGT currently has a P/E ratio of 148.09, whereas BYD's P/E ratio is 3.71. In terms of profitability, IGT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BYD's ROE of +0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, IGT is more volatile compared to BYD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IGT.Check BYD's competition here
IGT vs CZR Comparison April 2026
IGT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IGT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, CZR has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IGT is priced at $16.29, while CZR trades at $28.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IGT currently has a P/E ratio of 148.09, whereas CZR's P/E ratio is -11.62. In terms of profitability, IGT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CZR's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IGT is more volatile compared to CZR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IGT.Check CZR's competition here
IGT vs RSI Comparison April 2026
IGT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IGT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, RSI has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IGT is priced at $16.29, while RSI trades at $23.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IGT currently has a P/E ratio of 148.09, whereas RSI's P/E ratio is 76.28. In terms of profitability, IGT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RSI's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, IGT is more volatile compared to RSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IGT.Check RSI's competition here
IGT vs SGMS Comparison April 2026
IGT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IGT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, SGMS has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IGT is priced at $16.29, while SGMS trades at $58.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IGT currently has a P/E ratio of 148.09, whereas SGMS's P/E ratio is 30.71. In terms of profitability, IGT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SGMS's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, IGT is more volatile compared to SGMS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IGT.Check SGMS's competition here
IGT vs MTN Comparison April 2026
IGT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IGT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, MTN has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IGT is priced at $16.29, while MTN trades at $119.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IGT currently has a P/E ratio of 148.09, whereas MTN's P/E ratio is 18.96. In terms of profitability, IGT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MTN's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, IGT is more volatile compared to MTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IGT.Check MTN's competition here
IGT vs HGV Comparison April 2026
IGT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IGT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, HGV has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IGT is priced at $16.29, while HGV trades at $46.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IGT currently has a P/E ratio of 148.09, whereas HGV's P/E ratio is 51.84. In terms of profitability, IGT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HGV's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IGT is more volatile compared to HGV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IGT.Check HGV's competition here
IGT vs RRR Comparison April 2026
IGT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IGT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, RRR has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IGT is priced at $16.29, while RRR trades at $54.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IGT currently has a P/E ratio of 148.09, whereas RRR's P/E ratio is 17.33. In terms of profitability, IGT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RRR's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, IGT is more volatile compared to RRR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IGT.Check RRR's competition here
IGT vs VAC Comparison April 2026
IGT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IGT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, VAC has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IGT is priced at $16.29, while VAC trades at $72.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IGT currently has a P/E ratio of 148.09, whereas VAC's P/E ratio is -8.20. In terms of profitability, IGT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VAC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IGT is more volatile compared to VAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IGT.Check VAC's competition here
IGT vs BRSL Comparison April 2026
IGT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IGT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, BRSL has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IGT is priced at $16.29, while BRSL trades at $12.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IGT currently has a P/E ratio of 148.09, whereas BRSL's P/E ratio is -1292.50. In terms of profitability, IGT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BRSL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IGT is more volatile compared to BRSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IGT.Check BRSL's competition here
IGT vs PENN Comparison April 2026
IGT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IGT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, PENN has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IGT is priced at $16.29, while PENN trades at $17.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IGT currently has a P/E ratio of 148.09, whereas PENN's P/E ratio is -2.62. In terms of profitability, IGT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PENN's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, IGT is more volatile compared to PENN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IGT.Check PENN's competition here
IGT vs MLCO Comparison April 2026
IGT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IGT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, MLCO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IGT is priced at $16.29, while MLCO trades at $5.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IGT currently has a P/E ratio of 148.09, whereas MLCO's P/E ratio is 12.24. In terms of profitability, IGT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MLCO's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IGT is more volatile compared to MLCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IGT.Check MLCO's competition here
IGT vs MCRI Comparison April 2026
IGT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IGT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, MCRI has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IGT is priced at $16.29, while MCRI trades at $114.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IGT currently has a P/E ratio of 148.09, whereas MCRI's P/E ratio is 19.49. In terms of profitability, IGT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MCRI's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, IGT is more volatile compared to MCRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IGT.Check MCRI's competition here
IGT vs PLYA Comparison April 2026
IGT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IGT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, PLYA has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IGT is priced at $16.29, while PLYA trades at $13.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IGT currently has a P/E ratio of 148.09, whereas PLYA's P/E ratio is 26.43. In terms of profitability, IGT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PLYA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IGT is more volatile compared to PLYA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IGT.Check PLYA's competition here
IGT vs EVRI Comparison April 2026
IGT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IGT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, EVRI has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IGT is priced at $16.29, while EVRI trades at $14.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IGT currently has a P/E ratio of 148.09, whereas EVRI's P/E ratio is 89.00. In terms of profitability, IGT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EVRI's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IGT is more volatile compared to EVRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IGT.Check EVRI's competition here
IGT vs ACEL Comparison April 2026
IGT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IGT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, ACEL has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, IGT is priced at $16.29, while ACEL trades at $12.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IGT currently has a P/E ratio of 148.09, whereas ACEL's P/E ratio is 20.52. In terms of profitability, IGT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ACEL's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, IGT is more volatile compared to ACEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IGT.Check ACEL's competition here
IGT vs BVH Comparison April 2026
IGT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IGT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, BVH has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, IGT is priced at $16.29, while BVH trades at $75.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IGT currently has a P/E ratio of 148.09, whereas BVH's P/E ratio is 20.05. In terms of profitability, IGT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BVH's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, IGT is more volatile compared to BVH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IGT.Check BVH's competition here
IGT vs NGMS Comparison April 2026
IGT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IGT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, NGMS has a market cap of 998.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IGT is priced at $16.29, while NGMS trades at $29.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IGT currently has a P/E ratio of 148.09, whereas NGMS's P/E ratio is -81.81. In terms of profitability, IGT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NGMS's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IGT is more volatile compared to NGMS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IGT.Check NGMS's competition here
IGT vs FBYDP Comparison April 2026
IGT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IGT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, FBYDP has a market cap of 770.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IGT is priced at $16.29, while FBYDP trades at $14.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IGT currently has a P/E ratio of 148.09, whereas FBYDP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IGT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FBYDP's ROE of -2.55%. Regarding short-term risk, IGT is less volatile compared to FBYDP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IGT.Check FBYDP's competition here
IGT vs GDEN Comparison April 2026
IGT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IGT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, GDEN has a market cap of 748.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IGT is priced at $16.29, while GDEN trades at $28.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IGT currently has a P/E ratio of 148.09, whereas GDEN's P/E ratio is -123.26. In terms of profitability, IGT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GDEN's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IGT is more volatile compared to GDEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IGT.Check GDEN's competition here
IGT vs TPGH-UN Comparison April 2026
IGT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IGT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, TPGH-UN has a market cap of 580.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IGT is priced at $16.29, while TPGH-UN trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IGT currently has a P/E ratio of 148.09, whereas TPGH-UN's P/E ratio is -1000.00. In terms of profitability, IGT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TPGH-UN's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, IGT is more volatile compared to TPGH-UN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IGT.Check TPGH-UN's competition here
IGT vs BALY Comparison April 2026
IGT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IGT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, BALY has a market cap of 521.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IGT is priced at $16.29, while BALY trades at $12.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IGT currently has a P/E ratio of 148.09, whereas BALY's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, IGT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BALY's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, IGT is less volatile compared to BALY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IGT.Check BALY's competition here
IGT vs AGS Comparison April 2026
IGT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IGT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, AGS has a market cap of 518.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IGT is priced at $16.29, while AGS trades at $12.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IGT currently has a P/E ratio of 148.09, whereas AGS's P/E ratio is 10.77. In terms of profitability, IGT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AGS's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, IGT is more volatile compared to AGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IGT.Check AGS's competition here
IGT vs CDRO Comparison April 2026
IGT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IGT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, CDRO has a market cap of 404.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IGT is priced at $16.29, while CDRO trades at $8.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IGT currently has a P/E ratio of 148.09, whereas CDRO's P/E ratio is 443.50. In terms of profitability, IGT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CDRO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IGT is more volatile compared to CDRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IGT.Check CDRO's competition here
IGT vs INSE Comparison April 2026
IGT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IGT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, INSE has a market cap of 190.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IGT is priced at $16.29, while INSE trades at $7.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IGT currently has a P/E ratio of 148.09, whereas INSE's P/E ratio is -12.14. In terms of profitability, IGT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to INSE's ROE of +1.84%. Regarding short-term risk, IGT is more volatile compared to INSE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IGT.Check INSE's competition here
IGT vs MSC Comparison April 2026
IGT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IGT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, MSC has a market cap of 130.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IGT is priced at $16.29, while MSC trades at $2.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IGT currently has a P/E ratio of 148.09, whereas MSC's P/E ratio is -9.03. In terms of profitability, IGT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MSC's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IGT is less volatile compared to MSC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IGT.Check MSC's competition here
IGT vs GAMB Comparison April 2026
IGT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IGT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, GAMB has a market cap of 128.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IGT is priced at $16.29, while GAMB trades at $3.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IGT currently has a P/E ratio of 148.09, whereas GAMB's P/E ratio is -3.94. In terms of profitability, IGT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GAMB's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, IGT is more volatile compared to GAMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IGT.Check GAMB's competition here
IGT vs GAN Comparison April 2026
IGT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IGT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, GAN has a market cap of 91.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IGT is priced at $16.29, while GAN trades at $1.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IGT currently has a P/E ratio of 148.09, whereas GAN's P/E ratio is -8.21. In terms of profitability, IGT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GAN's ROE of +0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, IGT is more volatile compared to GAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IGT.Check GAN's competition here
IGT vs FLL Comparison April 2026
IGT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IGT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, FLL has a market cap of 90.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IGT is priced at $16.29, while FLL trades at $2.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IGT currently has a P/E ratio of 148.09, whereas FLL's P/E ratio is -2.22. In terms of profitability, IGT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FLL's ROE of -2.33%. Regarding short-term risk, IGT is more volatile compared to FLL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IGT.Check FLL's competition here
IGT vs CPHC Comparison April 2026
IGT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IGT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, CPHC has a market cap of 80.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IGT is priced at $16.29, while CPHC trades at $15.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IGT currently has a P/E ratio of 148.09, whereas CPHC's P/E ratio is -157.10. In terms of profitability, IGT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CPHC's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IGT is more volatile compared to CPHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IGT.Check CPHC's competition here
IGT vs ROLR Comparison April 2026
IGT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IGT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, ROLR has a market cap of 79.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IGT is priced at $16.29, while ROLR trades at $9.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IGT currently has a P/E ratio of 148.09, whereas ROLR's P/E ratio is 133.86. In terms of profitability, IGT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ROLR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IGT is less volatile compared to ROLR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IGT.Check ROLR's competition here
IGT vs CNTY Comparison April 2026
IGT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IGT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, CNTY has a market cap of 42.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IGT is priced at $16.29, while CNTY trades at $1.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IGT currently has a P/E ratio of 148.09, whereas CNTY's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, IGT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CNTY's ROE of +1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IGT is more volatile compared to CNTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IGT.Check CNTY's competition here
IGT vs LTRY Comparison April 2026
IGT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IGT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, LTRY has a market cap of 36.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IGT is priced at $16.29, while LTRY trades at $1.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IGT currently has a P/E ratio of 148.09, whereas LTRY's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, IGT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LTRY's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, IGT is less volatile compared to LTRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IGT.Check LTRY's competition here
IGT vs CDROW Comparison April 2026
IGT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IGT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, CDROW has a market cap of 34.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IGT is priced at $16.29, while CDROW trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IGT currently has a P/E ratio of 148.09, whereas CDROW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IGT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CDROW's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IGT is more volatile compared to CDROW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IGT.Check CDROW's competition here
IGT vs SLNA Comparison April 2026
IGT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IGT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, SLNA has a market cap of 16.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IGT is priced at $16.29, while SLNA trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IGT currently has a P/E ratio of 148.09, whereas SLNA's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, IGT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SLNA's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, IGT is less volatile compared to SLNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IGT.Check SLNA's competition here
IGT vs SEGG Comparison April 2026
IGT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IGT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, SEGG has a market cap of 8.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IGT is priced at $16.29, while SEGG trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IGT currently has a P/E ratio of 148.09, whereas SEGG's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, IGT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SEGG's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, IGT is less volatile compared to SEGG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IGT.Check SEGG's competition here
IGT vs SLNAW Comparison April 2026
IGT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IGT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, SLNAW has a market cap of 526.4K. Regarding current trading prices, IGT is priced at $16.29, while SLNAW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IGT currently has a P/E ratio of 148.09, whereas SLNAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IGT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SLNAW's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, IGT is less volatile compared to SLNAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IGT.Check SLNAW's competition here
IGT vs GMBL Comparison April 2026
IGT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IGT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, GMBL has a market cap of 194.8K. Regarding current trading prices, IGT is priced at $16.29, while GMBL trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IGT currently has a P/E ratio of 148.09, whereas GMBL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IGT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GMBL's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, IGT is more volatile compared to GMBL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IGT.Check GMBL's competition here
IGT vs LTRYW Comparison April 2026
IGT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IGT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, LTRYW has a market cap of 35.5K. Regarding current trading prices, IGT is priced at $16.29, while LTRYW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IGT currently has a P/E ratio of 148.09, whereas LTRYW's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, IGT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LTRYW's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, IGT is less volatile compared to LTRYW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IGT.Check LTRYW's competition here
IGT vs GMBLW Comparison April 2026
IGT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IGT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, GMBLW has a market cap of 31.1K. Regarding current trading prices, IGT is priced at $16.29, while GMBLW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IGT currently has a P/E ratio of 148.09, whereas GMBLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IGT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GMBLW's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, IGT is less volatile compared to GMBLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IGT.Check GMBLW's competition here
IGT vs GMBLP Comparison April 2026
IGT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IGT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, GMBLP has a market cap of 21.2K. Regarding current trading prices, IGT is priced at $16.29, while GMBLP trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IGT currently has a P/E ratio of 148.09, whereas GMBLP's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, IGT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GMBLP's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, IGT is more volatile compared to GMBLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IGT.Check GMBLP's competition here
IGT vs EBET Comparison April 2026
IGT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IGT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, EBET has a market cap of 1.5K. Regarding current trading prices, IGT is priced at $16.29, while EBET trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IGT currently has a P/E ratio of 148.09, whereas EBET's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IGT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EBET's ROE of +6.32%. Regarding short-term risk, IGT is more volatile compared to EBET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IGT.Check EBET's competition here
IGT vs GMBLZ Comparison April 2026
IGT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IGT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, GMBLZ has a market cap of 1.5K. Regarding current trading prices, IGT is priced at $16.29, while GMBLZ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IGT currently has a P/E ratio of 148.09, whereas GMBLZ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, IGT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GMBLZ's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, IGT is less volatile compared to GMBLZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IGT.Check GMBLZ's competition here
IGT vs GNOG Comparison April 2026
IGT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IGT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, GNOG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IGT is priced at $16.29, while GNOG trades at $5.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IGT currently has a P/E ratio of 148.09, whereas GNOG's P/E ratio is -3.90. In terms of profitability, IGT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GNOG's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IGT is less volatile compared to GNOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IGT.Check GNOG's competition here
IGT vs PNK Comparison April 2026
IGT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IGT stands at 3.3B. In comparison, PNK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IGT is priced at $16.29, while PNK trades at $32.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IGT currently has a P/E ratio of 148.09, whereas PNK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IGT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PNK's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, IGT is more volatile compared to PNK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IGT.Check PNK's competition here