GAN Limited (GAN) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (GAN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Gambling, Resorts & Casinos Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GAN | $1.97 | +0.00% | 91.5M | -8.21 | -$0.24 | N/A |
| LVS | $46.05 | -0.69% | 30.6B | 13.87 | $3.33 | +2.38% |
| FLUT | $106.18 | +1.98% | 17.7B | 13.53 | $7.55 | N/A |
| DKNG | $25.76 | -0.14% | 12.5B | 37.15 | $0.68 | N/A |
| MGM | $47.73 | -3.95% | 12.2B | 15.33 | $3.12 | N/A |
| WYNN | $96.56 | -2.88% | 10.1B | 22.22 | $4.37 | +1.03% |
| LNW | $99.75 | +0.25% | 8.4B | 21.78 | $4.58 | N/A |
| RSI | $31.46 | +0.45% | 7.1B | 70.74 | $0.42 | N/A |
| SGHC | $13.67 | -0.83% | 6.9B | 27.95 | $0.49 | +3.19% |
| BYD | $87.75 | -2.03% | 6.6B | 11.93 | $7.40 | +0.86% |
Stock Comparison
GAN vs LVS Comparison July 2026
GAN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAN stands at 91.5M. In comparison, LVS has a market cap of 30.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GAN is priced at $1.97, while LVS trades at $46.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.21, whereas LVS's P/E ratio is 13.87. In terms of profitability, GAN's ROE is +0.80%, compared to LVS's ROE of +1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GAN is less volatile compared to LVS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAN.Check LVS's competition here
GAN vs FLUT Comparison July 2026
GAN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAN stands at 91.5M. In comparison, FLUT has a market cap of 17.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GAN is priced at $1.97, while FLUT trades at $106.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.21, whereas FLUT's P/E ratio is 13.53. In terms of profitability, GAN's ROE is +0.80%, compared to FLUT's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GAN is less volatile compared to FLUT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAN.Check FLUT's competition here
GAN vs DKNG Comparison July 2026
GAN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAN stands at 91.5M. In comparison, DKNG has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GAN is priced at $1.97, while DKNG trades at $25.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.21, whereas DKNG's P/E ratio is 37.15. In terms of profitability, GAN's ROE is +0.80%, compared to DKNG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GAN is less volatile compared to DKNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAN.Check DKNG's competition here
GAN vs MGM Comparison July 2026
GAN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAN stands at 91.5M. In comparison, MGM has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GAN is priced at $1.97, while MGM trades at $47.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.21, whereas MGM's P/E ratio is 15.33. In terms of profitability, GAN's ROE is +0.80%, compared to MGM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GAN is less volatile compared to MGM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAN.Check MGM's competition here
GAN vs WYNN Comparison July 2026
GAN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAN stands at 91.5M. In comparison, WYNN has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GAN is priced at $1.97, while WYNN trades at $96.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.21, whereas WYNN's P/E ratio is 22.22. In terms of profitability, GAN's ROE is +0.80%, compared to WYNN's ROE of -1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GAN is less volatile compared to WYNN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAN.Check WYNN's competition here
GAN vs LNW Comparison July 2026
GAN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAN stands at 91.5M. In comparison, LNW has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GAN is priced at $1.97, while LNW trades at $99.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.21, whereas LNW's P/E ratio is 21.78. In terms of profitability, GAN's ROE is +0.80%, compared to LNW's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, GAN is less volatile compared to LNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAN.Check LNW's competition here
GAN vs RSI Comparison July 2026
GAN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAN stands at 91.5M. In comparison, RSI has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GAN is priced at $1.97, while RSI trades at $31.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.21, whereas RSI's P/E ratio is 70.74. In terms of profitability, GAN's ROE is +0.80%, compared to RSI's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, GAN is less volatile compared to RSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAN.Check RSI's competition here
GAN vs SGHC Comparison July 2026
GAN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAN stands at 91.5M. In comparison, SGHC has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GAN is priced at $1.97, while SGHC trades at $13.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.21, whereas SGHC's P/E ratio is 27.95. In terms of profitability, GAN's ROE is +0.80%, compared to SGHC's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, GAN is less volatile compared to SGHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAN.Check SGHC's competition here
GAN vs BYD Comparison July 2026
GAN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAN stands at 91.5M. In comparison, BYD has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GAN is priced at $1.97, while BYD trades at $87.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.21, whereas BYD's P/E ratio is 11.93. In terms of profitability, GAN's ROE is +0.80%, compared to BYD's ROE of +0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, GAN is less volatile compared to BYD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAN.Check BYD's competition here
GAN vs CHDN Comparison July 2026
GAN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAN stands at 91.5M. In comparison, CHDN has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GAN is priced at $1.97, while CHDN trades at $90.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.21, whereas CHDN's P/E ratio is 14.07. In terms of profitability, GAN's ROE is +0.80%, compared to CHDN's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, GAN is less volatile compared to CHDN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAN.Check CHDN's competition here
GAN vs CZR Comparison July 2026
GAN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAN stands at 91.5M. In comparison, CZR has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GAN is priced at $1.97, while CZR trades at $30.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.21, whereas CZR's P/E ratio is -12.73. In terms of profitability, GAN's ROE is +0.80%, compared to CZR's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GAN is less volatile compared to CZR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAN.Check CZR's competition here
GAN vs SGMS Comparison July 2026
GAN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAN stands at 91.5M. In comparison, SGMS has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GAN is priced at $1.97, while SGMS trades at $58.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.21, whereas SGMS's P/E ratio is 30.71. In terms of profitability, GAN's ROE is +0.80%, compared to SGMS's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, GAN is less volatile compared to SGMS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAN.Check SGMS's competition here
GAN vs MTN Comparison July 2026
GAN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAN stands at 91.5M. In comparison, MTN has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GAN is priced at $1.97, while MTN trades at $136.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.21, whereas MTN's P/E ratio is 30.96. In terms of profitability, GAN's ROE is +0.80%, compared to MTN's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, GAN is less volatile compared to MTN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAN.Check MTN's competition here
GAN vs RRR Comparison July 2026
GAN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAN stands at 91.5M. In comparison, RRR has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GAN is priced at $1.97, while RRR trades at $64.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.21, whereas RRR's P/E ratio is 20.92. In terms of profitability, GAN's ROE is +0.80%, compared to RRR's ROE of +0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, GAN is less volatile compared to RRR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAN.Check RRR's competition here
GAN vs VAC Comparison July 2026
GAN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAN stands at 91.5M. In comparison, VAC has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GAN is priced at $1.97, while VAC trades at $101.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.21, whereas VAC's P/E ratio is 15.08. In terms of profitability, GAN's ROE is +0.80%, compared to VAC's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GAN is less volatile compared to VAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAN.Check VAC's competition here
GAN vs IGT Comparison July 2026
GAN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAN stands at 91.5M. In comparison, IGT has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GAN is priced at $1.97, while IGT trades at $16.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.21, whereas IGT's P/E ratio is 148.09. In terms of profitability, GAN's ROE is +0.80%, compared to IGT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GAN is less volatile compared to IGT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAN.Check IGT's competition here
GAN vs PENN Comparison July 2026
GAN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAN stands at 91.5M. In comparison, PENN has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GAN is priced at $1.97, while PENN trades at $21.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.21, whereas PENN's P/E ratio is 356.50. In terms of profitability, GAN's ROE is +0.80%, compared to PENN's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, GAN is less volatile compared to PENN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAN.Check PENN's competition here
GAN vs MCRI Comparison July 2026
GAN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAN stands at 91.5M. In comparison, MCRI has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GAN is priced at $1.97, while MCRI trades at $130.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.21, whereas MCRI's P/E ratio is 22.31. In terms of profitability, GAN's ROE is +0.80%, compared to MCRI's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GAN is less volatile compared to MCRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAN.Check MCRI's competition here
GAN vs MLCO Comparison July 2026
GAN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAN stands at 91.5M. In comparison, MLCO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, GAN is priced at $1.97, while MLCO trades at $5.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.21, whereas MLCO's P/E ratio is 6.67. In terms of profitability, GAN's ROE is +0.80%, compared to MLCO's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GAN is less volatile compared to MLCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAN.Check MLCO's competition here
GAN vs BRSL Comparison July 2026
GAN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAN stands at 91.5M. In comparison, BRSL has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, GAN is priced at $1.97, while BRSL trades at $11.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.21, whereas BRSL's P/E ratio is 10.96. In terms of profitability, GAN's ROE is +0.80%, compared to BRSL's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GAN is less volatile compared to BRSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAN.Check BRSL's competition here
GAN vs PLYA Comparison July 2026
GAN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAN stands at 91.5M. In comparison, PLYA has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GAN is priced at $1.97, while PLYA trades at $13.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.21, whereas PLYA's P/E ratio is 26.43. In terms of profitability, GAN's ROE is +0.80%, compared to PLYA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GAN and PLYA have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PLYA's competition here
GAN vs EVRI Comparison July 2026
GAN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAN stands at 91.5M. In comparison, EVRI has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GAN is priced at $1.97, while EVRI trades at $14.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.21, whereas EVRI's P/E ratio is 89.00. In terms of profitability, GAN's ROE is +0.80%, compared to EVRI's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GAN is less volatile compared to EVRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAN.Check EVRI's competition here
GAN vs ACEL Comparison July 2026
GAN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAN stands at 91.5M. In comparison, ACEL has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, GAN is priced at $1.97, while ACEL trades at $12.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.21, whereas ACEL's P/E ratio is 14.85. In terms of profitability, GAN's ROE is +0.80%, compared to ACEL's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GAN is less volatile compared to ACEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAN.Check ACEL's competition here
GAN vs BVH Comparison July 2026
GAN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAN stands at 91.5M. In comparison, BVH has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, GAN is priced at $1.97, while BVH trades at $75.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.21, whereas BVH's P/E ratio is 20.05. In terms of profitability, GAN's ROE is +0.80%, compared to BVH's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, GAN is less volatile compared to BVH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAN.Check BVH's competition here
GAN vs NGMS Comparison July 2026
GAN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAN stands at 91.5M. In comparison, NGMS has a market cap of 998.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GAN is priced at $1.97, while NGMS trades at $29.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.21, whereas NGMS's P/E ratio is -81.81. In terms of profitability, GAN's ROE is +0.80%, compared to NGMS's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GAN is less volatile compared to NGMS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAN.Check NGMS's competition here
GAN vs FBYDP Comparison July 2026
GAN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAN stands at 91.5M. In comparison, FBYDP has a market cap of 770.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GAN is priced at $1.97, while FBYDP trades at $14.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.21, whereas FBYDP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GAN's ROE is +0.80%, compared to FBYDP's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GAN is less volatile compared to FBYDP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAN.Check FBYDP's competition here
GAN vs GDEN Comparison July 2026
GAN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAN stands at 91.5M. In comparison, GDEN has a market cap of 753.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GAN is priced at $1.97, while GDEN trades at $28.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.21, whereas GDEN's P/E ratio is -124.13. In terms of profitability, GAN's ROE is +0.80%, compared to GDEN's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GAN is less volatile compared to GDEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAN.Check GDEN's competition here
GAN vs BALY Comparison July 2026
GAN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAN stands at 91.5M. In comparison, BALY has a market cap of 672.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GAN is priced at $1.97, while BALY trades at $14.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.21, whereas BALY's P/E ratio is -1.58. In terms of profitability, GAN's ROE is +0.80%, compared to BALY's ROE of -1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GAN is less volatile compared to BALY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAN.Check BALY's competition here
GAN vs TPGH-UN Comparison July 2026
GAN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAN stands at 91.5M. In comparison, TPGH-UN has a market cap of 580.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GAN is priced at $1.97, while TPGH-UN trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.21, whereas TPGH-UN's P/E ratio is -1000.00. In terms of profitability, GAN's ROE is +0.80%, compared to TPGH-UN's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GAN and TPGH-UN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TPGH-UN's competition here
GAN vs AGS Comparison July 2026
GAN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAN stands at 91.5M. In comparison, AGS has a market cap of 518.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GAN is priced at $1.97, while AGS trades at $12.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.21, whereas AGS's P/E ratio is 10.77. In terms of profitability, GAN's ROE is +0.80%, compared to AGS's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, GAN is less volatile compared to AGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAN.Check AGS's competition here
GAN vs CDRO Comparison July 2026
GAN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAN stands at 91.5M. In comparison, CDRO has a market cap of 435.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GAN is priced at $1.97, while CDRO trades at $9.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.21, whereas CDRO's P/E ratio is 48.09. In terms of profitability, GAN's ROE is +0.80%, compared to CDRO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GAN is less volatile compared to CDRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAN.Check CDRO's competition here
GAN vs CDROW Comparison July 2026
GAN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAN stands at 91.5M. In comparison, CDROW has a market cap of 432.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GAN is priced at $1.97, while CDROW trades at $0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.21, whereas CDROW's P/E ratio is 6.02. In terms of profitability, GAN's ROE is +0.80%, compared to CDROW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GAN and CDROW have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CDROW's competition here
GAN vs INSE Comparison July 2026
GAN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAN stands at 91.5M. In comparison, INSE has a market cap of 220.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GAN is priced at $1.97, while INSE trades at $7.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.21, whereas INSE's P/E ratio is -75.00. In terms of profitability, GAN's ROE is +0.80%, compared to INSE's ROE of +1.48%. Regarding short-term risk, GAN is less volatile compared to INSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAN.Check INSE's competition here
GAN vs FLL Comparison July 2026
GAN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAN stands at 91.5M. In comparison, FLL has a market cap of 101.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GAN is priced at $1.97, while FLL trades at $2.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.21, whereas FLL's P/E ratio is -2.61. In terms of profitability, GAN's ROE is +0.80%, compared to FLL's ROE of -4.73%. Regarding short-term risk, GAN is less volatile compared to FLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAN.Check FLL's competition here
GAN vs MSC Comparison July 2026
GAN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAN stands at 91.5M. In comparison, MSC has a market cap of 88.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GAN is priced at $1.97, while MSC trades at $1.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.21, whereas MSC's P/E ratio is -8.32. In terms of profitability, GAN's ROE is +0.80%, compared to MSC's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GAN is less volatile compared to MSC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAN.Check MSC's competition here
GAN vs CPHC Comparison July 2026
GAN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAN stands at 91.5M. In comparison, CPHC has a market cap of 82.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GAN is priced at $1.97, while CPHC trades at $15.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.21, whereas CPHC's P/E ratio is -1595.00. In terms of profitability, GAN's ROE is +0.80%, compared to CPHC's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GAN is less volatile compared to CPHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAN.Check CPHC's competition here
GAN vs LTRY Comparison July 2026
GAN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAN stands at 91.5M. In comparison, LTRY has a market cap of 36.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GAN is priced at $1.97, while LTRY trades at $1.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.21, whereas LTRY's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, GAN's ROE is +0.80%, compared to LTRY's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, GAN is less volatile compared to LTRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAN.Check LTRY's competition here
GAN vs CNTY Comparison July 2026
GAN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAN stands at 91.5M. In comparison, CNTY has a market cap of 36M. Regarding current trading prices, GAN is priced at $1.97, while CNTY trades at $1.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.21, whereas CNTY's P/E ratio is -0.66. In terms of profitability, GAN's ROE is +0.80%, compared to CNTY's ROE of +0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, GAN is less volatile compared to CNTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAN.Check CNTY's competition here
GAN vs SLNA Comparison July 2026
GAN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAN stands at 91.5M. In comparison, SLNA has a market cap of 16.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GAN is priced at $1.97, while SLNA trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.21, whereas SLNA's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, GAN's ROE is +0.80%, compared to SLNA's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, GAN is less volatile compared to SLNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAN.Check SLNA's competition here
GAN vs SEGG Comparison July 2026
GAN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAN stands at 91.5M. In comparison, SEGG has a market cap of 11.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GAN is priced at $1.97, while SEGG trades at $0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.21, whereas SEGG's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, GAN's ROE is +0.80%, compared to SEGG's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, GAN is less volatile compared to SEGG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAN.Check SEGG's competition here
GAN vs SLNAW Comparison July 2026
GAN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAN stands at 91.5M. In comparison, SLNAW has a market cap of 526.4K. Regarding current trading prices, GAN is priced at $1.97, while SLNAW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.21, whereas SLNAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GAN's ROE is +0.80%, compared to SLNAW's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, GAN is less volatile compared to SLNAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAN.Check SLNAW's competition here
GAN vs LTRYW Comparison July 2026
GAN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAN stands at 91.5M. In comparison, LTRYW has a market cap of 40.6K. Regarding current trading prices, GAN is priced at $1.97, while LTRYW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.21, whereas LTRYW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GAN's ROE is +0.80%, compared to LTRYW's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, GAN is less volatile compared to LTRYW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAN.Check LTRYW's competition here
GAN vs GMBLW Comparison July 2026
GAN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAN stands at 91.5M. In comparison, GMBLW has a market cap of 31.1K. Regarding current trading prices, GAN is priced at $1.97, while GMBLW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.21, whereas GMBLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GAN's ROE is +0.80%, compared to GMBLW's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GAN is less volatile compared to GMBLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAN.Check GMBLW's competition here
GAN vs GMBLZ Comparison July 2026
GAN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAN stands at 91.5M. In comparison, GMBLZ has a market cap of 1.5K. Regarding current trading prices, GAN is priced at $1.97, while GMBLZ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.21, whereas GMBLZ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, GAN's ROE is +0.80%, compared to GMBLZ's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GAN is less volatile compared to GMBLZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAN.Check GMBLZ's competition here
GAN vs GNOG Comparison July 2026
GAN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAN stands at 91.5M. In comparison, GNOG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GAN is priced at $1.97, while GNOG trades at $5.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.21, whereas GNOG's P/E ratio is -3.90. In terms of profitability, GAN's ROE is +0.80%, compared to GNOG's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GAN is less volatile compared to GNOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GAN.Check GNOG's competition here
GAN vs PNK Comparison July 2026
GAN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GAN stands at 91.5M. In comparison, PNK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GAN is priced at $1.97, while PNK trades at $32.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GAN currently has a P/E ratio of -8.21, whereas PNK's P/E ratio is 25.16. In terms of profitability, GAN's ROE is +0.80%, compared to PNK's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GAN and PNK have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PNK's competition here