PENN Entertainment, Inc. (PENN) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (PENN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Gambling, Resorts & Casinos Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PENN | $22.06 | +0.82% | 3B | 367.67 | $0.06 | N/A |
| LVS | $46.37 | -1.59% | 30.7B | 13.93 | $3.33 | +2.38% |
| FLUT | $104.12 | -0.07% | 18B | 13.79 | $7.55 | N/A |
| DKNG | $25.80 | +0.39% | 12.8B | 37.94 | $0.68 | N/A |
| MGM | $49.69 | +1.02% | 12.7B | 15.92 | $3.12 | N/A |
| WYNN | $99.42 | -1.02% | 10.3B | 22.75 | $4.37 | +1.01% |
| LNW | $99.75 | +0.25% | 8.4B | 21.78 | $4.58 | N/A |
| RSI | $31.32 | -0.76% | 7.4B | 74.55 | $0.42 | N/A |
| SGHC | $13.78 | +0.07% | 7B | 28.41 | $0.49 | +3.15% |
| BYD | $89.57 | -0.14% | 6.7B | 12.10 | $7.40 | +0.85% |
Stock Comparison
PENN vs LVS Comparison July 2026
PENN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENN stands at 3B. In comparison, LVS has a market cap of 30.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PENN is priced at $22.06, while LVS trades at $46.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENN currently has a P/E ratio of 367.67, whereas LVS's P/E ratio is 13.93. In terms of profitability, PENN's ROE is -0.44%, compared to LVS's ROE of +1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PENN is less volatile compared to LVS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENN.Check LVS's competition here
PENN vs FLUT Comparison July 2026
PENN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENN stands at 3B. In comparison, FLUT has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, PENN is priced at $22.06, while FLUT trades at $104.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENN currently has a P/E ratio of 367.67, whereas FLUT's P/E ratio is 13.79. In terms of profitability, PENN's ROE is -0.44%, compared to FLUT's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PENN is less volatile compared to FLUT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENN.Check FLUT's competition here
PENN vs DKNG Comparison July 2026
PENN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENN stands at 3B. In comparison, DKNG has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PENN is priced at $22.06, while DKNG trades at $25.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENN currently has a P/E ratio of 367.67, whereas DKNG's P/E ratio is 37.94. In terms of profitability, PENN's ROE is -0.44%, compared to DKNG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PENN is less volatile compared to DKNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENN.Check DKNG's competition here
PENN vs MGM Comparison July 2026
PENN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENN stands at 3B. In comparison, MGM has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PENN is priced at $22.06, while MGM trades at $49.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENN currently has a P/E ratio of 367.67, whereas MGM's P/E ratio is 15.92. In terms of profitability, PENN's ROE is -0.44%, compared to MGM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PENN is less volatile compared to MGM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENN.Check MGM's competition here
PENN vs WYNN Comparison July 2026
PENN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENN stands at 3B. In comparison, WYNN has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PENN is priced at $22.06, while WYNN trades at $99.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENN currently has a P/E ratio of 367.67, whereas WYNN's P/E ratio is 22.75. In terms of profitability, PENN's ROE is -0.44%, compared to WYNN's ROE of -1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PENN is more volatile compared to WYNN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENN.Check WYNN's competition here
PENN vs LNW Comparison July 2026
PENN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENN stands at 3B. In comparison, LNW has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PENN is priced at $22.06, while LNW trades at $99.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENN currently has a P/E ratio of 367.67, whereas LNW's P/E ratio is 21.78. In terms of profitability, PENN's ROE is -0.44%, compared to LNW's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, PENN is more volatile compared to LNW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENN.Check LNW's competition here
PENN vs RSI Comparison July 2026
PENN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENN stands at 3B. In comparison, RSI has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PENN is priced at $22.06, while RSI trades at $31.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENN currently has a P/E ratio of 367.67, whereas RSI's P/E ratio is 74.55. In terms of profitability, PENN's ROE is -0.44%, compared to RSI's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, PENN is less volatile compared to RSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENN.Check RSI's competition here
PENN vs SGHC Comparison July 2026
PENN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENN stands at 3B. In comparison, SGHC has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, PENN is priced at $22.06, while SGHC trades at $13.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENN currently has a P/E ratio of 367.67, whereas SGHC's P/E ratio is 28.41. In terms of profitability, PENN's ROE is -0.44%, compared to SGHC's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, PENN is less volatile compared to SGHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENN.Check SGHC's competition here
PENN vs BYD Comparison July 2026
PENN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENN stands at 3B. In comparison, BYD has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PENN is priced at $22.06, while BYD trades at $89.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENN currently has a P/E ratio of 367.67, whereas BYD's P/E ratio is 12.10. In terms of profitability, PENN's ROE is -0.44%, compared to BYD's ROE of +0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, PENN is more volatile compared to BYD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENN.Check BYD's competition here
PENN vs CHDN Comparison July 2026
PENN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENN stands at 3B. In comparison, CHDN has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PENN is priced at $22.06, while CHDN trades at $90.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENN currently has a P/E ratio of 367.67, whereas CHDN's P/E ratio is 14.27. In terms of profitability, PENN's ROE is -0.44%, compared to CHDN's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, PENN is less volatile compared to CHDN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENN.Check CHDN's competition here
PENN vs CZR Comparison July 2026
PENN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENN stands at 3B. In comparison, CZR has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PENN is priced at $22.06, while CZR trades at $29.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENN currently has a P/E ratio of 367.67, whereas CZR's P/E ratio is -12.58. In terms of profitability, PENN's ROE is -0.44%, compared to CZR's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PENN is more volatile compared to CZR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENN.Check CZR's competition here
PENN vs SGMS Comparison July 2026
PENN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENN stands at 3B. In comparison, SGMS has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PENN is priced at $22.06, while SGMS trades at $58.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENN currently has a P/E ratio of 367.67, whereas SGMS's P/E ratio is 30.71. In terms of profitability, PENN's ROE is -0.44%, compared to SGMS's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, PENN is less volatile compared to SGMS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENN.Check SGMS's competition here
PENN vs MTN Comparison July 2026
PENN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENN stands at 3B. In comparison, MTN has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PENN is priced at $22.06, while MTN trades at $135.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENN currently has a P/E ratio of 367.67, whereas MTN's P/E ratio is 30.72. In terms of profitability, PENN's ROE is -0.44%, compared to MTN's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, PENN is less volatile compared to MTN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENN.Check MTN's competition here
PENN vs RRR Comparison July 2026
PENN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENN stands at 3B. In comparison, RRR has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PENN is priced at $22.06, while RRR trades at $65.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENN currently has a P/E ratio of 367.67, whereas RRR's P/E ratio is 21.19. In terms of profitability, PENN's ROE is -0.44%, compared to RRR's ROE of +0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, PENN is less volatile compared to RRR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENN.Check RRR's competition here
PENN vs VAC Comparison July 2026
PENN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENN stands at 3B. In comparison, VAC has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PENN is priced at $22.06, while VAC trades at $103.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENN currently has a P/E ratio of 367.67, whereas VAC's P/E ratio is 15.27. In terms of profitability, PENN's ROE is -0.44%, compared to VAC's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PENN is less volatile compared to VAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENN.Check VAC's competition here
PENN vs IGT Comparison July 2026
PENN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENN stands at 3B. In comparison, IGT has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PENN is priced at $22.06, while IGT trades at $16.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENN currently has a P/E ratio of 367.67, whereas IGT's P/E ratio is 148.09. In terms of profitability, PENN's ROE is -0.44%, compared to IGT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PENN is less volatile compared to IGT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENN.Check IGT's competition here
PENN vs MCRI Comparison July 2026
PENN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENN stands at 3B. In comparison, MCRI has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PENN is priced at $22.06, while MCRI trades at $133.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENN currently has a P/E ratio of 367.67, whereas MCRI's P/E ratio is 22.57. In terms of profitability, PENN's ROE is -0.44%, compared to MCRI's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PENN is less volatile compared to MCRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENN.Check MCRI's competition here
PENN vs MLCO Comparison July 2026
PENN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENN stands at 3B. In comparison, MLCO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PENN is priced at $22.06, while MLCO trades at $5.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENN currently has a P/E ratio of 367.67, whereas MLCO's P/E ratio is 6.81. In terms of profitability, PENN's ROE is -0.44%, compared to MLCO's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PENN is more volatile compared to MLCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENN.Check MLCO's competition here
PENN vs BRSL Comparison July 2026
PENN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENN stands at 3B. In comparison, BRSL has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, PENN is priced at $22.06, while BRSL trades at $10.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENN currently has a P/E ratio of 367.67, whereas BRSL's P/E ratio is 11.13. In terms of profitability, PENN's ROE is -0.44%, compared to BRSL's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PENN is less volatile compared to BRSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENN.Check BRSL's competition here
PENN vs PLYA Comparison July 2026
PENN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENN stands at 3B. In comparison, PLYA has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PENN is priced at $22.06, while PLYA trades at $13.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENN currently has a P/E ratio of 367.67, whereas PLYA's P/E ratio is 26.43. In terms of profitability, PENN's ROE is -0.44%, compared to PLYA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PENN is more volatile compared to PLYA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENN.Check PLYA's competition here
PENN vs EVRI Comparison July 2026
PENN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENN stands at 3B. In comparison, EVRI has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PENN is priced at $22.06, while EVRI trades at $14.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENN currently has a P/E ratio of 367.67, whereas EVRI's P/E ratio is 89.00. In terms of profitability, PENN's ROE is -0.44%, compared to EVRI's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PENN is more volatile compared to EVRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENN.Check EVRI's competition here
PENN vs ACEL Comparison July 2026
PENN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENN stands at 3B. In comparison, ACEL has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PENN is priced at $22.06, while ACEL trades at $12.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENN currently has a P/E ratio of 367.67, whereas ACEL's P/E ratio is 15.24. In terms of profitability, PENN's ROE is -0.44%, compared to ACEL's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PENN is less volatile compared to ACEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENN.Check ACEL's competition here
PENN vs BVH Comparison July 2026
PENN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENN stands at 3B. In comparison, BVH has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, PENN is priced at $22.06, while BVH trades at $75.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENN currently has a P/E ratio of 367.67, whereas BVH's P/E ratio is 20.05. In terms of profitability, PENN's ROE is -0.44%, compared to BVH's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, PENN is more volatile compared to BVH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENN.Check BVH's competition here
PENN vs NGMS Comparison July 2026
PENN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENN stands at 3B. In comparison, NGMS has a market cap of 998.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PENN is priced at $22.06, while NGMS trades at $29.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENN currently has a P/E ratio of 367.67, whereas NGMS's P/E ratio is -81.81. In terms of profitability, PENN's ROE is -0.44%, compared to NGMS's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PENN is more volatile compared to NGMS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENN.Check NGMS's competition here
PENN vs FBYDP Comparison July 2026
PENN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENN stands at 3B. In comparison, FBYDP has a market cap of 770.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PENN is priced at $22.06, while FBYDP trades at $14.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENN currently has a P/E ratio of 367.67, whereas FBYDP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PENN's ROE is -0.44%, compared to FBYDP's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PENN is less volatile compared to FBYDP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENN.Check FBYDP's competition here
PENN vs GDEN Comparison July 2026
PENN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENN stands at 3B. In comparison, GDEN has a market cap of 753.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PENN is priced at $22.06, while GDEN trades at $28.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENN currently has a P/E ratio of 367.67, whereas GDEN's P/E ratio is -124.13. In terms of profitability, PENN's ROE is -0.44%, compared to GDEN's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PENN is more volatile compared to GDEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENN.Check GDEN's competition here
PENN vs BALY Comparison July 2026
PENN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENN stands at 3B. In comparison, BALY has a market cap of 655.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PENN is priced at $22.06, while BALY trades at $13.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENN currently has a P/E ratio of 367.67, whereas BALY's P/E ratio is -1.54. In terms of profitability, PENN's ROE is -0.44%, compared to BALY's ROE of -1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PENN is less volatile compared to BALY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENN.Check BALY's competition here
PENN vs TPGH-UN Comparison July 2026
PENN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENN stands at 3B. In comparison, TPGH-UN has a market cap of 580.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PENN is priced at $22.06, while TPGH-UN trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENN currently has a P/E ratio of 367.67, whereas TPGH-UN's P/E ratio is -1000.00. In terms of profitability, PENN's ROE is -0.44%, compared to TPGH-UN's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PENN is more volatile compared to TPGH-UN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENN.Check TPGH-UN's competition here
PENN vs CDROW Comparison July 2026
PENN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENN stands at 3B. In comparison, CDROW has a market cap of 541.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PENN is priced at $22.06, while CDROW trades at $0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENN currently has a P/E ratio of 367.67, whereas CDROW's P/E ratio is 6.06. In terms of profitability, PENN's ROE is -0.44%, compared to CDROW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PENN is less volatile compared to CDROW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENN.Check CDROW's competition here
PENN vs AGS Comparison July 2026
PENN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENN stands at 3B. In comparison, AGS has a market cap of 518.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PENN is priced at $22.06, while AGS trades at $12.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENN currently has a P/E ratio of 367.67, whereas AGS's P/E ratio is 10.77. In terms of profitability, PENN's ROE is -0.44%, compared to AGS's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, PENN is more volatile compared to AGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENN.Check AGS's competition here
PENN vs CDRO Comparison July 2026
PENN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENN stands at 3B. In comparison, CDRO has a market cap of 435.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PENN is priced at $22.06, while CDRO trades at $9.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENN currently has a P/E ratio of 367.67, whereas CDRO's P/E ratio is 48.12. In terms of profitability, PENN's ROE is -0.44%, compared to CDRO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PENN is less volatile compared to CDRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENN.Check CDRO's competition here
PENN vs INSE Comparison July 2026
PENN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENN stands at 3B. In comparison, INSE has a market cap of 215M. Regarding current trading prices, PENN is priced at $22.06, while INSE trades at $8.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENN currently has a P/E ratio of 367.67, whereas INSE's P/E ratio is -73.27. In terms of profitability, PENN's ROE is -0.44%, compared to INSE's ROE of +1.48%. Regarding short-term risk, PENN is less volatile compared to INSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENN.Check INSE's competition here
PENN vs FLL Comparison July 2026
PENN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENN stands at 3B. In comparison, FLL has a market cap of 103M. Regarding current trading prices, PENN is priced at $22.06, while FLL trades at $2.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENN currently has a P/E ratio of 367.67, whereas FLL's P/E ratio is -2.65. In terms of profitability, PENN's ROE is -0.44%, compared to FLL's ROE of -4.73%. Regarding short-term risk, PENN is less volatile compared to FLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENN.Check FLL's competition here
PENN vs GAN Comparison July 2026
PENN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENN stands at 3B. In comparison, GAN has a market cap of 91.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PENN is priced at $22.06, while GAN trades at $1.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENN currently has a P/E ratio of 367.67, whereas GAN's P/E ratio is -8.21. In terms of profitability, PENN's ROE is -0.44%, compared to GAN's ROE of +0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, PENN is more volatile compared to GAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENN.Check GAN's competition here
PENN vs MSC Comparison July 2026
PENN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENN stands at 3B. In comparison, MSC has a market cap of 88.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PENN is priced at $22.06, while MSC trades at $1.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENN currently has a P/E ratio of 367.67, whereas MSC's P/E ratio is -8.32. In terms of profitability, PENN's ROE is -0.44%, compared to MSC's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PENN is less volatile compared to MSC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENN.Check MSC's competition here
PENN vs CPHC Comparison July 2026
PENN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENN stands at 3B. In comparison, CPHC has a market cap of 82.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PENN is priced at $22.06, while CPHC trades at $16.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENN currently has a P/E ratio of 367.67, whereas CPHC's P/E ratio is -1605.00. In terms of profitability, PENN's ROE is -0.44%, compared to CPHC's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PENN is less volatile compared to CPHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENN.Check CPHC's competition here
PENN vs LTRY Comparison July 2026
PENN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENN stands at 3B. In comparison, LTRY has a market cap of 36.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PENN is priced at $22.06, while LTRY trades at $1.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENN currently has a P/E ratio of 367.67, whereas LTRY's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, PENN's ROE is -0.44%, compared to LTRY's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, PENN is less volatile compared to LTRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENN.Check LTRY's competition here
PENN vs CNTY Comparison July 2026
PENN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENN stands at 3B. In comparison, CNTY has a market cap of 36.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PENN is priced at $22.06, while CNTY trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENN currently has a P/E ratio of 367.67, whereas CNTY's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, PENN's ROE is -0.44%, compared to CNTY's ROE of +0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, PENN is less volatile compared to CNTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENN.Check CNTY's competition here
PENN vs SLNA Comparison July 2026
PENN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENN stands at 3B. In comparison, SLNA has a market cap of 16.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PENN is priced at $22.06, while SLNA trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENN currently has a P/E ratio of 367.67, whereas SLNA's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, PENN's ROE is -0.44%, compared to SLNA's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, PENN is less volatile compared to SLNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENN.Check SLNA's competition here
PENN vs SEGG Comparison July 2026
PENN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENN stands at 3B. In comparison, SEGG has a market cap of 11.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PENN is priced at $22.06, while SEGG trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENN currently has a P/E ratio of 367.67, whereas SEGG's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, PENN's ROE is -0.44%, compared to SEGG's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, PENN is less volatile compared to SEGG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENN.Check SEGG's competition here
PENN vs SLNAW Comparison July 2026
PENN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENN stands at 3B. In comparison, SLNAW has a market cap of 526.4K. Regarding current trading prices, PENN is priced at $22.06, while SLNAW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENN currently has a P/E ratio of 367.67, whereas SLNAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PENN's ROE is -0.44%, compared to SLNAW's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, PENN is less volatile compared to SLNAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENN.Check SLNAW's competition here
PENN vs LTRYW Comparison July 2026
PENN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENN stands at 3B. In comparison, LTRYW has a market cap of 39.8K. Regarding current trading prices, PENN is priced at $22.06, while LTRYW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENN currently has a P/E ratio of 367.67, whereas LTRYW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PENN's ROE is -0.44%, compared to LTRYW's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, PENN is less volatile compared to LTRYW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENN.Check LTRYW's competition here
PENN vs GMBLW Comparison July 2026
PENN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENN stands at 3B. In comparison, GMBLW has a market cap of 31.1K. Regarding current trading prices, PENN is priced at $22.06, while GMBLW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENN currently has a P/E ratio of 367.67, whereas GMBLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PENN's ROE is -0.44%, compared to GMBLW's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PENN is less volatile compared to GMBLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENN.Check GMBLW's competition here
PENN vs GMBLZ Comparison July 2026
PENN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENN stands at 3B. In comparison, GMBLZ has a market cap of 1.5K. Regarding current trading prices, PENN is priced at $22.06, while GMBLZ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENN currently has a P/E ratio of 367.67, whereas GMBLZ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, PENN's ROE is -0.44%, compared to GMBLZ's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PENN is less volatile compared to GMBLZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENN.Check GMBLZ's competition here
PENN vs GNOG Comparison July 2026
PENN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENN stands at 3B. In comparison, GNOG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PENN is priced at $22.06, while GNOG trades at $5.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENN currently has a P/E ratio of 367.67, whereas GNOG's P/E ratio is -3.90. In terms of profitability, PENN's ROE is -0.44%, compared to GNOG's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PENN is less volatile compared to GNOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENN.Check GNOG's competition here
PENN vs PNK Comparison July 2026
PENN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENN stands at 3B. In comparison, PNK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PENN is priced at $22.06, while PNK trades at $32.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENN currently has a P/E ratio of 367.67, whereas PNK's P/E ratio is 25.16. In terms of profitability, PENN's ROE is -0.44%, compared to PNK's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PENN is more volatile compared to PNK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENN.Check PNK's competition here