Las Vegas Sands Corp.
Las Vegas Sands Corp. (LVS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (LVS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Gambling, Resorts & Casinos Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LVS | $54.48 | +3.16% | 36.1B | 20.10 | $2.71 | +1.94% |
| FLUT | $110.93 | -0.57% | 19.4B | -63.41 | -$1.75 | N/A |
| DKNG | $23.53 | +1.51% | 11.7B | -2353.00 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| WYNN | $105.51 | -0.15% | 11B | 33.60 | $3.14 | +0.94% |
| MGM | $40.55 | +2.55% | 10.4B | 53.37 | $0.76 | N/A |
| LNW | $99.75 | +0.25% | 8.4B | 21.78 | $4.58 | N/A |
| CHDN | $102.84 | +1.27% | 7B | 18.49 | $5.43 | +0.43% |
| BYD | $87.53 | +4.35% | 6.6B | 3.87 | $22.62 | +0.85% |
| SGHC | $12.48 | -0.40% | 6.3B | 29.05 | $0.43 | +3.36% |
| CZR | $28.03 | -0.32% | 5.7B | -11.58 | -$2.42 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
LVS vs FLUT Comparison April 2026
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 36.1B. In comparison, FLUT has a market cap of 19.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $54.48, while FLUT trades at $110.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.10, whereas FLUT's P/E ratio is -63.41. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +1.16%, compared to FLUT's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is more volatile compared to FLUT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check FLUT's competition here
LVS vs DKNG Comparison April 2026
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 36.1B. In comparison, DKNG has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $54.48, while DKNG trades at $23.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.10, whereas DKNG's P/E ratio is -2353.00. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +1.16%, compared to DKNG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is less volatile compared to DKNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check DKNG's competition here
LVS vs WYNN Comparison April 2026
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 36.1B. In comparison, WYNN has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $54.48, while WYNN trades at $105.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.10, whereas WYNN's P/E ratio is 33.60. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +1.16%, compared to WYNN's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is more volatile compared to WYNN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check WYNN's competition here
LVS vs MGM Comparison April 2026
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 36.1B. In comparison, MGM has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $54.48, while MGM trades at $40.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.10, whereas MGM's P/E ratio is 53.37. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +1.16%, compared to MGM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is more volatile compared to MGM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check MGM's competition here
LVS vs LNW Comparison April 2026
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 36.1B. In comparison, LNW has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $54.48, while LNW trades at $99.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.10, whereas LNW's P/E ratio is 21.78. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +1.16%, compared to LNW's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is more volatile compared to LNW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check LNW's competition here
LVS vs CHDN Comparison April 2026
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 36.1B. In comparison, CHDN has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $54.48, while CHDN trades at $102.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.10, whereas CHDN's P/E ratio is 18.49. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +1.16%, compared to CHDN's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is more volatile compared to CHDN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check CHDN's competition here
LVS vs BYD Comparison April 2026
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 36.1B. In comparison, BYD has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $54.48, while BYD trades at $87.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.10, whereas BYD's P/E ratio is 3.87. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +1.16%, compared to BYD's ROE of +0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is less volatile compared to BYD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check BYD's competition here
LVS vs SGHC Comparison April 2026
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 36.1B. In comparison, SGHC has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $54.48, while SGHC trades at $12.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.10, whereas SGHC's P/E ratio is 29.05. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +1.16%, compared to SGHC's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is more volatile compared to SGHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check SGHC's competition here
LVS vs CZR Comparison April 2026
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 36.1B. In comparison, CZR has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $54.48, while CZR trades at $28.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.10, whereas CZR's P/E ratio is -11.58. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +1.16%, compared to CZR's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is more volatile compared to CZR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check CZR's competition here
LVS vs RSI Comparison April 2026
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 36.1B. In comparison, RSI has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $54.48, while RSI trades at $24.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.10, whereas RSI's P/E ratio is 78.32. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +1.16%, compared to RSI's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is more volatile compared to RSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check RSI's competition here
LVS vs SGMS Comparison April 2026
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 36.1B. In comparison, SGMS has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $54.48, while SGMS trades at $58.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.10, whereas SGMS's P/E ratio is 30.71. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +1.16%, compared to SGMS's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is less volatile compared to SGMS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check SGMS's competition here
LVS vs MTN Comparison April 2026
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 36.1B. In comparison, MTN has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $54.48, while MTN trades at $120.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.10, whereas MTN's P/E ratio is 19.18. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +1.16%, compared to MTN's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is more volatile compared to MTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check MTN's competition here
LVS vs HGV Comparison April 2026
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 36.1B. In comparison, HGV has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $54.48, while HGV trades at $46.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.10, whereas HGV's P/E ratio is 52.10. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +1.16%, compared to HGV's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is more volatile compared to HGV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check HGV's competition here
LVS vs IGT Comparison April 2026
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 36.1B. In comparison, IGT has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $54.48, while IGT trades at $16.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.10, whereas IGT's P/E ratio is 148.09. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +1.16%, compared to IGT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is less volatile compared to IGT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check IGT's competition here
LVS vs RRR Comparison April 2026
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 36.1B. In comparison, RRR has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $54.48, while RRR trades at $54.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.10, whereas RRR's P/E ratio is 17.45. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +1.16%, compared to RRR's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is more volatile compared to RRR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check RRR's competition here
LVS vs VAC Comparison April 2026
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 36.1B. In comparison, VAC has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $54.48, while VAC trades at $72.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.10, whereas VAC's P/E ratio is -8.19. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +1.16%, compared to VAC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is more volatile compared to VAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check VAC's competition here
LVS vs PENN Comparison April 2026
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 36.1B. In comparison, PENN has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $54.48, while PENN trades at $17.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.10, whereas PENN's P/E ratio is -2.71. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +1.16%, compared to PENN's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is less volatile compared to PENN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check PENN's competition here
LVS vs BRSL Comparison April 2026
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 36.1B. In comparison, BRSL has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $54.48, while BRSL trades at $12.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.10, whereas BRSL's P/E ratio is -1285.00. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +1.16%, compared to BRSL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is more volatile compared to BRSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check BRSL's competition here
LVS vs MLCO Comparison April 2026
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 36.1B. In comparison, MLCO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $54.48, while MLCO trades at $5.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.10, whereas MLCO's P/E ratio is 12.15. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +1.16%, compared to MLCO's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is more volatile compared to MLCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check MLCO's competition here
LVS vs MCRI Comparison April 2026
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 36.1B. In comparison, MCRI has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $54.48, while MCRI trades at $117.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.10, whereas MCRI's P/E ratio is 19.93. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +1.16%, compared to MCRI's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is more volatile compared to MCRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check MCRI's competition here
LVS vs PLYA Comparison April 2026
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 36.1B. In comparison, PLYA has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $54.48, while PLYA trades at $13.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.10, whereas PLYA's P/E ratio is 26.43. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +1.16%, compared to PLYA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is more volatile compared to PLYA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check PLYA's competition here
LVS vs EVRI Comparison April 2026
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 36.1B. In comparison, EVRI has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $54.48, while EVRI trades at $14.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.10, whereas EVRI's P/E ratio is 89.00. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +1.16%, compared to EVRI's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is more volatile compared to EVRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check EVRI's competition here
LVS vs ACEL Comparison April 2026
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 36.1B. In comparison, ACEL has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $54.48, while ACEL trades at $12.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.10, whereas ACEL's P/E ratio is 20.59. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +1.16%, compared to ACEL's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is more volatile compared to ACEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check ACEL's competition here
LVS vs BVH Comparison April 2026
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 36.1B. In comparison, BVH has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $54.48, while BVH trades at $75.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.10, whereas BVH's P/E ratio is 20.05. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +1.16%, compared to BVH's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is more volatile compared to BVH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check BVH's competition here
LVS vs NGMS Comparison April 2026
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 36.1B. In comparison, NGMS has a market cap of 998.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $54.48, while NGMS trades at $29.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.10, whereas NGMS's P/E ratio is -81.81. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +1.16%, compared to NGMS's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is more volatile compared to NGMS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check NGMS's competition here
LVS vs FBYDP Comparison April 2026
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 36.1B. In comparison, FBYDP has a market cap of 770.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $54.48, while FBYDP trades at $14.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.10, whereas FBYDP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +1.16%, compared to FBYDP's ROE of -2.55%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is less volatile compared to FBYDP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check FBYDP's competition here
LVS vs GDEN Comparison April 2026
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 36.1B. In comparison, GDEN has a market cap of 750M. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $54.48, while GDEN trades at $28.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.10, whereas GDEN's P/E ratio is -123.52. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +1.16%, compared to GDEN's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is more volatile compared to GDEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check GDEN's competition here
LVS vs TPGH-UN Comparison April 2026
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 36.1B. In comparison, TPGH-UN has a market cap of 580.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $54.48, while TPGH-UN trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.10, whereas TPGH-UN's P/E ratio is -1000.00. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +1.16%, compared to TPGH-UN's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is more volatile compared to TPGH-UN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check TPGH-UN's competition here
LVS vs BALY Comparison April 2026
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 36.1B. In comparison, BALY has a market cap of 536.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $54.48, while BALY trades at $12.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.10, whereas BALY's P/E ratio is -0.98. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +1.16%, compared to BALY's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is less volatile compared to BALY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check BALY's competition here
LVS vs AGS Comparison April 2026
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 36.1B. In comparison, AGS has a market cap of 518.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $54.48, while AGS trades at $12.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.10, whereas AGS's P/E ratio is 10.77. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +1.16%, compared to AGS's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is more volatile compared to AGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check AGS's competition here
LVS vs CDRO Comparison April 2026
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 36.1B. In comparison, CDRO has a market cap of 404.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $54.48, while CDRO trades at $8.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.10, whereas CDRO's P/E ratio is 444.25. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +1.16%, compared to CDRO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is less volatile compared to CDRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check CDRO's competition here
LVS vs INSE Comparison April 2026
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 36.1B. In comparison, INSE has a market cap of 189.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $54.48, while INSE trades at $7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.10, whereas INSE's P/E ratio is -12.09. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +1.16%, compared to INSE's ROE of +1.84%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is less volatile compared to INSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check INSE's competition here
LVS vs GAMB Comparison April 2026
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 36.1B. In comparison, GAMB has a market cap of 133.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $54.48, while GAMB trades at $3.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.10, whereas GAMB's P/E ratio is -4.10. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +1.16%, compared to GAMB's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is less volatile compared to GAMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check GAMB's competition here
LVS vs MSC Comparison April 2026
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 36.1B. In comparison, MSC has a market cap of 121.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $54.48, while MSC trades at $2.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.10, whereas MSC's P/E ratio is -8.40. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +1.16%, compared to MSC's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is less volatile compared to MSC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check MSC's competition here
LVS vs ROLR Comparison April 2026
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 36.1B. In comparison, ROLR has a market cap of 93.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $54.48, while ROLR trades at $11.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.10, whereas ROLR's P/E ratio is 157.57. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +1.16%, compared to ROLR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is less volatile compared to ROLR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check ROLR's competition here
LVS vs GAN Comparison April 2026
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 36.1B. In comparison, GAN has a market cap of 91.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $54.48, while GAN trades at $1.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.10, whereas GAN's P/E ratio is -8.21. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +1.16%, compared to GAN's ROE of +0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is more volatile compared to GAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check GAN's competition here
LVS vs FLL Comparison April 2026
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 36.1B. In comparison, FLL has a market cap of 87.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $54.48, while FLL trades at $2.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.10, whereas FLL's P/E ratio is -2.16. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +1.16%, compared to FLL's ROE of -2.33%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is less volatile compared to FLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check FLL's competition here
LVS vs CPHC Comparison April 2026
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 36.1B. In comparison, CPHC has a market cap of 79.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $54.48, while CPHC trades at $15.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.10, whereas CPHC's P/E ratio is -155.60. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +1.16%, compared to CPHC's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is more volatile compared to CPHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check CPHC's competition here
LVS vs CNTY Comparison April 2026
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 36.1B. In comparison, CNTY has a market cap of 41.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $54.48, while CNTY trades at $1.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.10, whereas CNTY's P/E ratio is -0.71. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +1.16%, compared to CNTY's ROE of +1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is less volatile compared to CNTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check CNTY's competition here
LVS vs LTRY Comparison April 2026
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 36.1B. In comparison, LTRY has a market cap of 36.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $54.48, while LTRY trades at $1.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.10, whereas LTRY's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +1.16%, compared to LTRY's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is less volatile compared to LTRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check LTRY's competition here
LVS vs CDROW Comparison April 2026
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 36.1B. In comparison, CDROW has a market cap of 34.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $54.48, while CDROW trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.10, whereas CDROW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +1.16%, compared to CDROW's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is more volatile compared to CDROW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check CDROW's competition here
LVS vs SLNA Comparison April 2026
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 36.1B. In comparison, SLNA has a market cap of 16.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $54.48, while SLNA trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.10, whereas SLNA's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +1.16%, compared to SLNA's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is less volatile compared to SLNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check SLNA's competition here
LVS vs SEGG Comparison April 2026
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 36.1B. In comparison, SEGG has a market cap of 11.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $54.48, while SEGG trades at $0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.10, whereas SEGG's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +1.16%, compared to SEGG's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is less volatile compared to SEGG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check SEGG's competition here
LVS vs SLNAW Comparison April 2026
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 36.1B. In comparison, SLNAW has a market cap of 526.4K. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $54.48, while SLNAW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.10, whereas SLNAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +1.16%, compared to SLNAW's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is less volatile compared to SLNAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check SLNAW's competition here
LVS vs GMBL Comparison April 2026
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 36.1B. In comparison, GMBL has a market cap of 175.2K. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $54.48, while GMBL trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.10, whereas GMBL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +1.16%, compared to GMBL's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is more volatile compared to GMBL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check GMBL's competition here
LVS vs LTRYW Comparison April 2026
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 36.1B. In comparison, LTRYW has a market cap of 43.3K. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $54.48, while LTRYW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.10, whereas LTRYW's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +1.16%, compared to LTRYW's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is less volatile compared to LTRYW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check LTRYW's competition here
LVS vs GMBLW Comparison April 2026
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 36.1B. In comparison, GMBLW has a market cap of 31.1K. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $54.48, while GMBLW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.10, whereas GMBLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +1.16%, compared to GMBLW's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is less volatile compared to GMBLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check GMBLW's competition here
LVS vs GMBLP Comparison April 2026
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 36.1B. In comparison, GMBLP has a market cap of 21.2K. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $54.48, while GMBLP trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.10, whereas GMBLP's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +1.16%, compared to GMBLP's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is more volatile compared to GMBLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check GMBLP's competition here
LVS vs EBET Comparison April 2026
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 36.1B. In comparison, EBET has a market cap of 3K. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $54.48, while EBET trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.10, whereas EBET's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +1.16%, compared to EBET's ROE of +6.32%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is less volatile compared to EBET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check EBET's competition here
LVS vs GMBLZ Comparison April 2026
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 36.1B. In comparison, GMBLZ has a market cap of 1.5K. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $54.48, while GMBLZ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.10, whereas GMBLZ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +1.16%, compared to GMBLZ's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is less volatile compared to GMBLZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check GMBLZ's competition here
LVS vs GNOG Comparison April 2026
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 36.1B. In comparison, GNOG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $54.48, while GNOG trades at $5.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.10, whereas GNOG's P/E ratio is -3.90. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +1.16%, compared to GNOG's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is less volatile compared to GNOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check GNOG's competition here
LVS vs PNK Comparison April 2026
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 36.1B. In comparison, PNK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $54.48, while PNK trades at $32.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.10, whereas PNK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +1.16%, compared to PNK's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is more volatile compared to PNK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check PNK's competition here