Las Vegas Sands Corp. (LVS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (LVS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Gambling, Resorts & Casinos Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LVS | $46.25 | +0.13% | 30.6B | 13.89 | $3.33 | +2.39% |
| FLUT | $105.39 | +3.15% | 18.3B | 13.96 | $7.55 | N/A |
| DKNG | $25.77 | +2.02% | 12.8B | 37.90 | $0.68 | N/A |
| MGM | $47.52 | -0.61% | 12.2B | 15.24 | $3.12 | N/A |
| WYNN | $96.11 | -1.01% | 10B | 21.99 | $4.37 | +1.03% |
| LNW | $99.75 | +0.25% | 8.4B | 21.78 | $4.58 | N/A |
| RSI | $31.26 | +5.11% | 7.4B | 74.45 | $0.42 | N/A |
| SGHC | $13.97 | +3.10% | 7.1B | 28.82 | $0.49 | +3.09% |
| BYD | $87.98 | -0.40% | 6.5B | 11.89 | $7.40 | +0.87% |
| CHDN | $89.15 | -0.55% | 6.2B | 14.00 | $6.37 | +0.49% |
Stock Comparison
LVS vs FLUT Comparison July 2026
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 30.6B. In comparison, FLUT has a market cap of 18.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $46.25, while FLUT trades at $105.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.89, whereas FLUT's P/E ratio is 13.96. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +1.16%, compared to FLUT's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is less volatile compared to FLUT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check FLUT's competition here
LVS vs DKNG Comparison July 2026
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 30.6B. In comparison, DKNG has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $46.25, while DKNG trades at $25.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.89, whereas DKNG's P/E ratio is 37.90. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +1.16%, compared to DKNG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is less volatile compared to DKNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check DKNG's competition here
LVS vs MGM Comparison July 2026
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 30.6B. In comparison, MGM has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $46.25, while MGM trades at $47.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.89, whereas MGM's P/E ratio is 15.24. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +1.16%, compared to MGM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is more volatile compared to MGM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check MGM's competition here
LVS vs WYNN Comparison July 2026
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 30.6B. In comparison, WYNN has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $46.25, while WYNN trades at $96.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.89, whereas WYNN's P/E ratio is 21.99. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +1.16%, compared to WYNN's ROE of -1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is less volatile compared to WYNN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check WYNN's competition here
LVS vs LNW Comparison July 2026
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 30.6B. In comparison, LNW has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $46.25, while LNW trades at $99.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.89, whereas LNW's P/E ratio is 21.78. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +1.16%, compared to LNW's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is less volatile compared to LNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check LNW's competition here
LVS vs RSI Comparison July 2026
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 30.6B. In comparison, RSI has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $46.25, while RSI trades at $31.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.89, whereas RSI's P/E ratio is 74.45. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +1.16%, compared to RSI's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is less volatile compared to RSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check RSI's competition here
LVS vs SGHC Comparison July 2026
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 30.6B. In comparison, SGHC has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $46.25, while SGHC trades at $13.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.89, whereas SGHC's P/E ratio is 28.82. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +1.16%, compared to SGHC's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is less volatile compared to SGHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check SGHC's competition here
LVS vs BYD Comparison July 2026
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 30.6B. In comparison, BYD has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $46.25, while BYD trades at $87.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.89, whereas BYD's P/E ratio is 11.89. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +1.16%, compared to BYD's ROE of +0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is less volatile compared to BYD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check BYD's competition here
LVS vs CHDN Comparison July 2026
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 30.6B. In comparison, CHDN has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $46.25, while CHDN trades at $89.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.89, whereas CHDN's P/E ratio is 14.00. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +1.16%, compared to CHDN's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is less volatile compared to CHDN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check CHDN's competition here
LVS vs CZR Comparison July 2026
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 30.6B. In comparison, CZR has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $46.25, while CZR trades at $30.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.89, whereas CZR's P/E ratio is -12.83. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +1.16%, compared to CZR's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is less volatile compared to CZR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check CZR's competition here
LVS vs SGMS Comparison July 2026
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 30.6B. In comparison, SGMS has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $46.25, while SGMS trades at $58.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.89, whereas SGMS's P/E ratio is 30.71. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +1.16%, compared to SGMS's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is less volatile compared to SGMS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check SGMS's competition here
LVS vs MTN Comparison July 2026
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 30.6B. In comparison, MTN has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $46.25, while MTN trades at $136.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.89, whereas MTN's P/E ratio is 30.99. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +1.16%, compared to MTN's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is less volatile compared to MTN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check MTN's competition here
LVS vs RRR Comparison July 2026
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 30.6B. In comparison, RRR has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $46.25, while RRR trades at $64.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.89, whereas RRR's P/E ratio is 20.64. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +1.16%, compared to RRR's ROE of +0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is less volatile compared to RRR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check RRR's competition here
LVS vs VAC Comparison July 2026
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 30.6B. In comparison, VAC has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $46.25, while VAC trades at $99.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.89, whereas VAC's P/E ratio is 14.82. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +1.16%, compared to VAC's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is less volatile compared to VAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check VAC's competition here
LVS vs IGT Comparison July 2026
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 30.6B. In comparison, IGT has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $46.25, while IGT trades at $16.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.89, whereas IGT's P/E ratio is 148.09. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +1.16%, compared to IGT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is less volatile compared to IGT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check IGT's competition here
LVS vs PENN Comparison July 2026
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 30.6B. In comparison, PENN has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $46.25, while PENN trades at $21.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.89, whereas PENN's P/E ratio is 358.17. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +1.16%, compared to PENN's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is less volatile compared to PENN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check PENN's competition here
LVS vs MCRI Comparison July 2026
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 30.6B. In comparison, MCRI has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $46.25, while MCRI trades at $130.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.89, whereas MCRI's P/E ratio is 22.05. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +1.16%, compared to MCRI's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is less volatile compared to MCRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check MCRI's competition here
LVS vs BRSL Comparison July 2026
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 30.6B. In comparison, BRSL has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $46.25, while BRSL trades at $11.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.89, whereas BRSL's P/E ratio is 11.36. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +1.16%, compared to BRSL's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is less volatile compared to BRSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check BRSL's competition here
LVS vs MLCO Comparison July 2026
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 30.6B. In comparison, MLCO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $46.25, while MLCO trades at $5.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.89, whereas MLCO's P/E ratio is 6.63. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +1.16%, compared to MLCO's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is less volatile compared to MLCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check MLCO's competition here
LVS vs PLYA Comparison July 2026
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 30.6B. In comparison, PLYA has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $46.25, while PLYA trades at $13.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.89, whereas PLYA's P/E ratio is 26.43. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +1.16%, compared to PLYA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is more volatile compared to PLYA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check PLYA's competition here
LVS vs EVRI Comparison July 2026
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 30.6B. In comparison, EVRI has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $46.25, while EVRI trades at $14.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.89, whereas EVRI's P/E ratio is 89.00. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +1.16%, compared to EVRI's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is more volatile compared to EVRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check EVRI's competition here
LVS vs ACEL Comparison July 2026
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 30.6B. In comparison, ACEL has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $46.25, while ACEL trades at $12.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.89, whereas ACEL's P/E ratio is 15.02. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +1.16%, compared to ACEL's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is more volatile compared to ACEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check ACEL's competition here
LVS vs BVH Comparison July 2026
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 30.6B. In comparison, BVH has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $46.25, while BVH trades at $75.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.89, whereas BVH's P/E ratio is 20.05. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +1.16%, compared to BVH's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is more volatile compared to BVH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check BVH's competition here
LVS vs NGMS Comparison July 2026
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 30.6B. In comparison, NGMS has a market cap of 998.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $46.25, while NGMS trades at $29.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.89, whereas NGMS's P/E ratio is -81.81. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +1.16%, compared to NGMS's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is more volatile compared to NGMS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check NGMS's competition here
LVS vs FBYDP Comparison July 2026
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 30.6B. In comparison, FBYDP has a market cap of 770.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $46.25, while FBYDP trades at $14.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.89, whereas FBYDP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +1.16%, compared to FBYDP's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is less volatile compared to FBYDP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check FBYDP's competition here
LVS vs GDEN Comparison July 2026
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 30.6B. In comparison, GDEN has a market cap of 753.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $46.25, while GDEN trades at $28.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.89, whereas GDEN's P/E ratio is -124.13. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +1.16%, compared to GDEN's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is more volatile compared to GDEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check GDEN's competition here
LVS vs BALY Comparison July 2026
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 30.6B. In comparison, BALY has a market cap of 697.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $46.25, while BALY trades at $14.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.89, whereas BALY's P/E ratio is -1.64. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +1.16%, compared to BALY's ROE of -1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is less volatile compared to BALY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check BALY's competition here
LVS vs TPGH-UN Comparison July 2026
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 30.6B. In comparison, TPGH-UN has a market cap of 580.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $46.25, while TPGH-UN trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.89, whereas TPGH-UN's P/E ratio is -1000.00. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +1.16%, compared to TPGH-UN's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is more volatile compared to TPGH-UN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check TPGH-UN's competition here
LVS vs AGS Comparison July 2026
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 30.6B. In comparison, AGS has a market cap of 518.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $46.25, while AGS trades at $12.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.89, whereas AGS's P/E ratio is 10.77. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +1.16%, compared to AGS's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is more volatile compared to AGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check AGS's competition here
LVS vs CDRO Comparison July 2026
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 30.6B. In comparison, CDRO has a market cap of 427.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $46.25, while CDRO trades at $9.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.89, whereas CDRO's P/E ratio is 47.24. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +1.16%, compared to CDRO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is less volatile compared to CDRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check CDRO's competition here
LVS vs CDROW Comparison July 2026
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 30.6B. In comparison, CDROW has a market cap of 377.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $46.25, while CDROW trades at $0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.89, whereas CDROW's P/E ratio is 5.26. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +1.16%, compared to CDROW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is more volatile compared to CDROW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check CDROW's competition here
LVS vs INSE Comparison July 2026
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 30.6B. In comparison, INSE has a market cap of 206.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $46.25, while INSE trades at $7.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.89, whereas INSE's P/E ratio is -70.45. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +1.16%, compared to INSE's ROE of +1.48%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is less volatile compared to INSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check INSE's competition here
LVS vs FLL Comparison July 2026
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 30.6B. In comparison, FLL has a market cap of 103M. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $46.25, while FLL trades at $2.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.89, whereas FLL's P/E ratio is -2.65. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +1.16%, compared to FLL's ROE of -4.73%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is less volatile compared to FLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check FLL's competition here
LVS vs MSC Comparison July 2026
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 30.6B. In comparison, MSC has a market cap of 93.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $46.25, while MSC trades at $1.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.89, whereas MSC's P/E ratio is -8.82. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +1.16%, compared to MSC's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is less volatile compared to MSC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check MSC's competition here
LVS vs GAN Comparison July 2026
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 30.6B. In comparison, GAN has a market cap of 91.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $46.25, while GAN trades at $1.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.89, whereas GAN's P/E ratio is -8.21. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +1.16%, compared to GAN's ROE of +0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is more volatile compared to GAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check GAN's competition here
LVS vs CPHC Comparison July 2026
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 30.6B. In comparison, CPHC has a market cap of 83.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $46.25, while CPHC trades at $16.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.89, whereas CPHC's P/E ratio is -1614.00. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +1.16%, compared to CPHC's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is less volatile compared to CPHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check CPHC's competition here
LVS vs LTRY Comparison July 2026
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 30.6B. In comparison, LTRY has a market cap of 36.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $46.25, while LTRY trades at $1.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.89, whereas LTRY's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +1.16%, compared to LTRY's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is less volatile compared to LTRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check LTRY's competition here
LVS vs CNTY Comparison July 2026
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 30.6B. In comparison, CNTY has a market cap of 36.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $46.25, while CNTY trades at $1.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.89, whereas CNTY's P/E ratio is -0.66. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +1.16%, compared to CNTY's ROE of +0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is less volatile compared to CNTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check CNTY's competition here
LVS vs SLNA Comparison July 2026
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 30.6B. In comparison, SLNA has a market cap of 16.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $46.25, while SLNA trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.89, whereas SLNA's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +1.16%, compared to SLNA's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is less volatile compared to SLNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check SLNA's competition here
LVS vs SEGG Comparison July 2026
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 30.6B. In comparison, SEGG has a market cap of 11.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $46.25, while SEGG trades at $0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.89, whereas SEGG's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +1.16%, compared to SEGG's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is less volatile compared to SEGG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check SEGG's competition here
LVS vs SLNAW Comparison July 2026
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 30.6B. In comparison, SLNAW has a market cap of 526.4K. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $46.25, while SLNAW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.89, whereas SLNAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +1.16%, compared to SLNAW's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is less volatile compared to SLNAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check SLNAW's competition here
LVS vs LTRYW Comparison July 2026
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 30.6B. In comparison, LTRYW has a market cap of 40.6K. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $46.25, while LTRYW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.89, whereas LTRYW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +1.16%, compared to LTRYW's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is less volatile compared to LTRYW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check LTRYW's competition here
LVS vs GMBLW Comparison July 2026
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 30.6B. In comparison, GMBLW has a market cap of 31.1K. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $46.25, while GMBLW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.89, whereas GMBLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +1.16%, compared to GMBLW's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is less volatile compared to GMBLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check GMBLW's competition here
LVS vs GMBLZ Comparison July 2026
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 30.6B. In comparison, GMBLZ has a market cap of 1.5K. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $46.25, while GMBLZ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.89, whereas GMBLZ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +1.16%, compared to GMBLZ's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is less volatile compared to GMBLZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check GMBLZ's competition here
LVS vs PNK Comparison July 2026
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 30.6B. In comparison, PNK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $46.25, while PNK trades at $32.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.89, whereas PNK's P/E ratio is 25.16. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +1.16%, compared to PNK's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is more volatile compared to PNK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check PNK's competition here
LVS vs GNOG Comparison July 2026
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 30.6B. In comparison, GNOG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $46.25, while GNOG trades at $5.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.89, whereas GNOG's P/E ratio is -3.90. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +1.16%, compared to GNOG's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is less volatile compared to GNOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check GNOG's competition here