Selina Hospitality PLC
Selina Hospitality PLC SLNA Peers
See (SLNA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Gambling, Resorts & Casinos Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SLNA | $0.03 | -20.21% | 16.3M | -0.02 | -$1.49 | N/A |
| FLUT | $283.36 | +4.46% | 49.2B | 95.41 | $2.92 | N/A |
| LVS | $43.51 | -0.25% | 31.2B | 24.65 | $1.79 | +2.05% |
| DKNG | $42.70 | +1.11% | 21.3B | -52.30 | -$0.82 | N/A |
| WYNN | $93.51 | +0.94% | 9.9B | 25.32 | $3.74 | +1.07% |
| MGM | $34.25 | +1.35% | 9.4B | 15.34 | $2.24 | N/A |
| LNW | $95.75 | +0.10% | 8.1B | 25.62 | $3.74 | N/A |
| CHDN | $101.12 | +0.52% | 7.3B | 17.96 | $5.62 | +0.41% |
| BYD | $78.16 | +0.50% | 6.4B | 12.95 | $6.10 | +0.90% |
| CZR | $28.33 | -0.62% | 6B | -26.24 | -$1.10 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
SLNA vs FLUT Comparison
SLNA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLNA stands at 16.3M. In comparison, FLUT has a market cap of 49.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SLNA is priced at $0.03, while FLUT trades at $283.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLNA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas FLUT's P/E ratio is 95.41. In terms of profitability, SLNA's ROE is +0.81%, compared to FLUT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SLNA is more volatile compared to FLUT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLNA.
SLNA vs LVS Comparison
SLNA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLNA stands at 16.3M. In comparison, LVS has a market cap of 31.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SLNA is priced at $0.03, while LVS trades at $43.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLNA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas LVS's P/E ratio is 24.65. In terms of profitability, SLNA's ROE is +0.81%, compared to LVS's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, SLNA is more volatile compared to LVS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLNA.
SLNA vs DKNG Comparison
SLNA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLNA stands at 16.3M. In comparison, DKNG has a market cap of 21.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SLNA is priced at $0.03, while DKNG trades at $42.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLNA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas DKNG's P/E ratio is -52.30. In terms of profitability, SLNA's ROE is +0.81%, compared to DKNG's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, SLNA is more volatile compared to DKNG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLNA.
SLNA vs WYNN Comparison
SLNA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLNA stands at 16.3M. In comparison, WYNN has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SLNA is priced at $0.03, while WYNN trades at $93.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLNA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas WYNN's P/E ratio is 25.32. In terms of profitability, SLNA's ROE is +0.81%, compared to WYNN's ROE of -1.76%. Regarding short-term risk, SLNA is more volatile compared to WYNN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLNA.
SLNA vs MGM Comparison
SLNA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLNA stands at 16.3M. In comparison, MGM has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SLNA is priced at $0.03, while MGM trades at $34.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLNA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas MGM's P/E ratio is 15.34. In terms of profitability, SLNA's ROE is +0.81%, compared to MGM's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SLNA is more volatile compared to MGM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLNA.
SLNA vs LNW Comparison
SLNA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLNA stands at 16.3M. In comparison, LNW has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SLNA is priced at $0.03, while LNW trades at $95.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLNA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas LNW's P/E ratio is 25.62. In terms of profitability, SLNA's ROE is +0.81%, compared to LNW's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, SLNA is more volatile compared to LNW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLNA.
SLNA vs CHDN Comparison
SLNA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLNA stands at 16.3M. In comparison, CHDN has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SLNA is priced at $0.03, while CHDN trades at $101.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLNA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas CHDN's P/E ratio is 17.96. In terms of profitability, SLNA's ROE is +0.81%, compared to CHDN's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, SLNA is more volatile compared to CHDN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLNA.
SLNA vs BYD Comparison
SLNA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLNA stands at 16.3M. In comparison, BYD has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SLNA is priced at $0.03, while BYD trades at $78.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLNA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas BYD's P/E ratio is 12.95. In terms of profitability, SLNA's ROE is +0.81%, compared to BYD's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, SLNA is more volatile compared to BYD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLNA.
SLNA vs CZR Comparison
SLNA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLNA stands at 16.3M. In comparison, CZR has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, SLNA is priced at $0.03, while CZR trades at $28.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLNA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas CZR's P/E ratio is -26.24. In terms of profitability, SLNA's ROE is +0.81%, compared to CZR's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SLNA is more volatile compared to CZR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLNA.
SLNA vs MTN Comparison
SLNA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLNA stands at 16.3M. In comparison, MTN has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SLNA is priced at $0.03, while MTN trades at $156.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLNA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas MTN's P/E ratio is 20.05. In terms of profitability, SLNA's ROE is +0.81%, compared to MTN's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, SLNA is more volatile compared to MTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLNA.
SLNA vs SGHC Comparison
SLNA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLNA stands at 16.3M. In comparison, SGHC has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SLNA is priced at $0.03, while SGHC trades at $10.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLNA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SGHC's P/E ratio is 42.72. In terms of profitability, SLNA's ROE is +0.81%, compared to SGHC's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SLNA is more volatile compared to SGHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLNA.
SLNA vs SGMS Comparison
SLNA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLNA stands at 16.3M. In comparison, SGMS has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SLNA is priced at $0.03, while SGMS trades at $58.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLNA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SGMS's P/E ratio is 30.71. In terms of profitability, SLNA's ROE is +0.81%, compared to SGMS's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, SLNA is more volatile compared to SGMS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLNA.
SLNA vs RSI Comparison
SLNA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLNA stands at 16.3M. In comparison, RSI has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SLNA is priced at $0.03, while RSI trades at $14.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLNA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas RSI's P/E ratio is 163.39. In terms of profitability, SLNA's ROE is +0.81%, compared to RSI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SLNA is more volatile compared to RSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLNA.
SLNA vs HGV Comparison
SLNA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLNA stands at 16.3M. In comparison, HGV has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SLNA is priced at $0.03, while HGV trades at $41.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLNA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas HGV's P/E ratio is 130.28. In terms of profitability, SLNA's ROE is +0.81%, compared to HGV's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SLNA is more volatile compared to HGV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLNA.
SLNA vs IGT Comparison
SLNA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLNA stands at 16.3M. In comparison, IGT has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SLNA is priced at $0.03, while IGT trades at $15.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLNA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas IGT's P/E ratio is 143.09. In terms of profitability, SLNA's ROE is +0.81%, compared to IGT's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SLNA is more volatile compared to IGT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLNA.
SLNA vs RRR Comparison
SLNA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLNA stands at 16.3M. In comparison, RRR has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SLNA is priced at $0.03, while RRR trades at $51.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLNA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas RRR's P/E ratio is 19.94. In terms of profitability, SLNA's ROE is +0.81%, compared to RRR's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, SLNA is more volatile compared to RRR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLNA.
SLNA vs PENN Comparison
SLNA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLNA stands at 16.3M. In comparison, PENN has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SLNA is priced at $0.03, while PENN trades at $17.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLNA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas PENN's P/E ratio is -29.97. In terms of profitability, SLNA's ROE is +0.81%, compared to PENN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SLNA is more volatile compared to PENN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLNA.
SLNA vs VAC Comparison
SLNA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLNA stands at 16.3M. In comparison, VAC has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SLNA is priced at $0.03, while VAC trades at $72.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLNA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas VAC's P/E ratio is 12.63. In terms of profitability, SLNA's ROE is +0.81%, compared to VAC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SLNA is more volatile compared to VAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLNA.
SLNA vs PLYA Comparison
SLNA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLNA stands at 16.3M. In comparison, PLYA has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SLNA is priced at $0.03, while PLYA trades at $13.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLNA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas PLYA's P/E ratio is 26.43. In terms of profitability, SLNA's ROE is +0.81%, compared to PLYA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SLNA is more volatile compared to PLYA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLNA.
SLNA vs MCRI Comparison
SLNA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLNA stands at 16.3M. In comparison, MCRI has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SLNA is priced at $0.03, while MCRI trades at $86.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLNA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas MCRI's P/E ratio is 22.02. In terms of profitability, SLNA's ROE is +0.81%, compared to MCRI's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SLNA is more volatile compared to MCRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLNA.
SLNA vs EVRI Comparison
SLNA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLNA stands at 16.3M. In comparison, EVRI has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SLNA is priced at $0.03, while EVRI trades at $14.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLNA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas EVRI's P/E ratio is 88.88. In terms of profitability, SLNA's ROE is +0.81%, compared to EVRI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SLNA is more volatile compared to EVRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLNA.
SLNA vs ACEL Comparison
SLNA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLNA stands at 16.3M. In comparison, ACEL has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, SLNA is priced at $0.03, while ACEL trades at $11.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLNA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas ACEL's P/E ratio is 24.27. In terms of profitability, SLNA's ROE is +0.81%, compared to ACEL's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SLNA is more volatile compared to ACEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLNA.
SLNA vs BVH Comparison
SLNA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLNA stands at 16.3M. In comparison, BVH has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, SLNA is priced at $0.03, while BVH trades at $75.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLNA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas BVH's P/E ratio is 20.05. In terms of profitability, SLNA's ROE is +0.81%, compared to BVH's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SLNA is more volatile compared to BVH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLNA.
SLNA vs NGMS Comparison
SLNA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLNA stands at 16.3M. In comparison, NGMS has a market cap of 998.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SLNA is priced at $0.03, while NGMS trades at $29.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLNA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas NGMS's P/E ratio is -81.81. In terms of profitability, SLNA's ROE is +0.81%, compared to NGMS's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SLNA is more volatile compared to NGMS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLNA.
SLNA vs MLCO Comparison
SLNA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLNA stands at 16.3M. In comparison, MLCO has a market cap of 986.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SLNA is priced at $0.03, while MLCO trades at $7.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLNA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas MLCO's P/E ratio is 51.43. In terms of profitability, SLNA's ROE is +0.81%, compared to MLCO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SLNA is more volatile compared to MLCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLNA.
SLNA vs GDEN Comparison
SLNA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLNA stands at 16.3M. In comparison, GDEN has a market cap of 780.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SLNA is priced at $0.03, while GDEN trades at $29.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLNA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas GDEN's P/E ratio is 68.63. In terms of profitability, SLNA's ROE is +0.81%, compared to GDEN's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SLNA is more volatile compared to GDEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLNA.
SLNA vs TPGH-UN Comparison
SLNA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLNA stands at 16.3M. In comparison, TPGH-UN has a market cap of 580.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SLNA is priced at $0.03, while TPGH-UN trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLNA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas TPGH-UN's P/E ratio is -1000.00. In terms of profitability, SLNA's ROE is +0.81%, compared to TPGH-UN's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SLNA is more volatile compared to TPGH-UN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLNA.
SLNA vs SBET Comparison
SLNA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLNA stands at 16.3M. In comparison, SBET has a market cap of 570.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SLNA is priced at $0.03, while SBET trades at $9.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLNA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SBET's P/E ratio is 0.20. In terms of profitability, SLNA's ROE is +0.81%, compared to SBET's ROE of -1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, SLNA is more volatile compared to SBET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLNA.
SLNA vs AGS Comparison
SLNA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLNA stands at 16.3M. In comparison, AGS has a market cap of 518.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SLNA is priced at $0.03, while AGS trades at $12.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLNA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas AGS's P/E ratio is 10.76. In terms of profitability, SLNA's ROE is +0.81%, compared to AGS's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, SLNA is more volatile compared to AGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLNA.
SLNA vs GAMB Comparison
SLNA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLNA stands at 16.3M. In comparison, GAMB has a market cap of 428M. Regarding current trading prices, SLNA is priced at $0.03, while GAMB trades at $12.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLNA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas GAMB's P/E ratio is 12.52. In terms of profitability, SLNA's ROE is +0.81%, compared to GAMB's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SLNA is more volatile compared to GAMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLNA.
SLNA vs BALY Comparison
SLNA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLNA stands at 16.3M. In comparison, BALY has a market cap of 412.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SLNA is priced at $0.03, while BALY trades at $9.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLNA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas BALY's P/E ratio is -0.97. In terms of profitability, SLNA's ROE is +0.81%, compared to BALY's ROE of -1.56%. Regarding short-term risk, SLNA is more volatile compared to BALY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLNA.
SLNA vs CDRO Comparison
SLNA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLNA stands at 16.3M. In comparison, CDRO has a market cap of 385.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SLNA is priced at $0.03, while CDRO trades at $8.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLNA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas CDRO's P/E ratio is 93.78. In terms of profitability, SLNA's ROE is +0.81%, compared to CDRO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SLNA is more volatile compared to CDRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLNA.
SLNA vs INSE Comparison
SLNA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLNA stands at 16.3M. In comparison, INSE has a market cap of 214.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SLNA is priced at $0.03, while INSE trades at $8.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLNA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas INSE's P/E ratio is 3.26. In terms of profitability, SLNA's ROE is +0.81%, compared to INSE's ROE of -1.75%. Regarding short-term risk, SLNA is more volatile compared to INSE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLNA.
SLNA vs MSC Comparison
SLNA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLNA stands at 16.3M. In comparison, MSC has a market cap of 155.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SLNA is priced at $0.03, while MSC trades at $3.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLNA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas MSC's P/E ratio is -6.46. In terms of profitability, SLNA's ROE is +0.81%, compared to MSC's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SLNA is more volatile compared to MSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLNA.
SLNA vs FLL Comparison
SLNA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLNA stands at 16.3M. In comparison, FLL has a market cap of 134.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SLNA is priced at $0.03, while FLL trades at $3.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLNA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas FLL's P/E ratio is -3.41. In terms of profitability, SLNA's ROE is +0.81%, compared to FLL's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, SLNA is more volatile compared to FLL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLNA.
SLNA vs CPHC Comparison
SLNA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLNA stands at 16.3M. In comparison, CPHC has a market cap of 94.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SLNA is priced at $0.03, while CPHC trades at $18.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLNA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas CPHC's P/E ratio is 117.56. In terms of profitability, SLNA's ROE is +0.81%, compared to CPHC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SLNA is more volatile compared to CPHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLNA.
SLNA vs GAN Comparison
SLNA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLNA stands at 16.3M. In comparison, GAN has a market cap of 91.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SLNA is priced at $0.03, while GAN trades at $1.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLNA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas GAN's P/E ratio is -8.21. In terms of profitability, SLNA's ROE is +0.81%, compared to GAN's ROE of +0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, SLNA is more volatile compared to GAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLNA.
SLNA vs CNTY Comparison
SLNA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLNA stands at 16.3M. In comparison, CNTY has a market cap of 73M. Regarding current trading prices, SLNA is priced at $0.03, while CNTY trades at $2.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLNA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas CNTY's P/E ratio is -0.54. In terms of profitability, SLNA's ROE is +0.81%, compared to CNTY's ROE of -6.50%. Regarding short-term risk, SLNA is more volatile compared to CNTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLNA.
SLNA vs CDROW Comparison
SLNA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLNA stands at 16.3M. In comparison, CDROW has a market cap of 41.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SLNA is priced at $0.03, while CDROW trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLNA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas CDROW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLNA's ROE is +0.81%, compared to CDROW's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SLNA is more volatile compared to CDROW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLNA.
SLNA vs LTRYW Comparison
SLNA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLNA stands at 16.3M. In comparison, LTRYW has a market cap of 36.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SLNA is priced at $0.03, while LTRYW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLNA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas LTRYW's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, SLNA's ROE is +0.81%, compared to LTRYW's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, SLNA is more volatile compared to LTRYW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLNA.
SLNA vs LTRY Comparison
SLNA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLNA stands at 16.3M. In comparison, LTRY has a market cap of 29.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SLNA is priced at $0.03, while LTRY trades at $1.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLNA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas LTRY's P/E ratio is -0.54. In terms of profitability, SLNA's ROE is +0.81%, compared to LTRY's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, SLNA is more volatile compared to LTRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLNA.
SLNA vs SLNAW Comparison
SLNA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLNA stands at 16.3M. In comparison, SLNAW has a market cap of 526.4K. Regarding current trading prices, SLNA is priced at $0.03, while SLNAW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLNA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SLNAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLNA's ROE is +0.81%, compared to SLNAW's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, SLNA is more volatile compared to SLNAW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLNA.
SLNA vs GMBL Comparison
SLNA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLNA stands at 16.3M. In comparison, GMBL has a market cap of 339.2K. Regarding current trading prices, SLNA is priced at $0.03, while GMBL trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLNA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas GMBL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLNA's ROE is +0.81%, compared to GMBL's ROE of +1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, SLNA is more volatile compared to GMBL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLNA.
SLNA vs GMBLP Comparison
SLNA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLNA stands at 16.3M. In comparison, GMBLP has a market cap of 47.2K. Regarding current trading prices, SLNA is priced at $0.03, while GMBLP trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLNA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas GMBLP's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SLNA's ROE is +0.81%, compared to GMBLP's ROE of +1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, SLNA is more volatile compared to GMBLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLNA.
SLNA vs GMBLW Comparison
SLNA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLNA stands at 16.3M. In comparison, GMBLW has a market cap of 31.1K. Regarding current trading prices, SLNA is priced at $0.03, while GMBLW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLNA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas GMBLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLNA's ROE is +0.81%, compared to GMBLW's ROE of +1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, SLNA is less volatile compared to GMBLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLNA.
SLNA vs EBET Comparison
SLNA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLNA stands at 16.3M. In comparison, EBET has a market cap of 12K. Regarding current trading prices, SLNA is priced at $0.03, while EBET trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLNA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas EBET's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLNA's ROE is +0.81%, compared to EBET's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SLNA is more volatile compared to EBET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLNA.
SLNA vs GMBLZ Comparison
SLNA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLNA stands at 16.3M. In comparison, GMBLZ has a market cap of 1.5K. Regarding current trading prices, SLNA is priced at $0.03, while GMBLZ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLNA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas GMBLZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLNA's ROE is +0.81%, compared to GMBLZ's ROE of +1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, SLNA is more volatile compared to GMBLZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLNA.
SLNA vs GNOG Comparison
SLNA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLNA stands at 16.3M. In comparison, GNOG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SLNA is priced at $0.03, while GNOG trades at $5.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLNA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas GNOG's P/E ratio is -3.90. In terms of profitability, SLNA's ROE is +0.81%, compared to GNOG's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SLNA is more volatile compared to GNOG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLNA.