Shoe Carnival, Inc. Common Stock (SHOE) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SHOE) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Apparel - Retail Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SHOE | $15.98 | +2.30% | 433.9M | 28.54 | $0.56 | +3.96% |
| TJX | $155.29 | +0.06% | 171.7B | 31.08 | $5.00 | +1.13% |
| ROST | $213.26 | -0.87% | 68.4B | 29.78 | $7.16 | +0.79% |
| BURL | $320.77 | -1.14% | 20.2B | 31.19 | $10.29 | N/A |
| LULU | $117.57 | +4.92% | 13.4B | 9.49 | $12.39 | N/A |
| GPS | $24.55 | +4.38% | 9.2B | 13.64 | $1.80 | +2.44% |
| GAP | $20.21 | -0.05% | 7.3B | 10.00 | $2.02 | +3.33% |
| VSCO | $88.50 | +6.63% | 6.8B | 44.14 | $1.93 | N/A |
| URBN | $73.54 | +3.04% | 6.3B | 13.16 | $5.59 | N/A |
| BOOT | $177.58 | +1.39% | 5.4B | 24.16 | $7.35 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
SHOE vs TJX Comparison July 2026
SHOE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHOE stands at 433.9M. In comparison, TJX has a market cap of 171.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOE is priced at $15.98, while TJX trades at $155.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHOE currently has a P/E ratio of 28.54, whereas TJX's P/E ratio is 31.08. In terms of profitability, SHOE's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TJX's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOE is more volatile compared to TJX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOE.Check TJX's competition here
SHOE vs ROST Comparison July 2026
SHOE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHOE stands at 433.9M. In comparison, ROST has a market cap of 68.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOE is priced at $15.98, while ROST trades at $213.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHOE currently has a P/E ratio of 28.54, whereas ROST's P/E ratio is 29.78. In terms of profitability, SHOE's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ROST's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOE is more volatile compared to ROST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOE.Check ROST's competition here
SHOE vs BURL Comparison July 2026
SHOE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHOE stands at 433.9M. In comparison, BURL has a market cap of 20.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOE is priced at $15.98, while BURL trades at $320.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHOE currently has a P/E ratio of 28.54, whereas BURL's P/E ratio is 31.19. In terms of profitability, SHOE's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BURL's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOE is less volatile compared to BURL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOE.Check BURL's competition here
SHOE vs LULU Comparison July 2026
SHOE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHOE stands at 433.9M. In comparison, LULU has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOE is priced at $15.98, while LULU trades at $117.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHOE currently has a P/E ratio of 28.54, whereas LULU's P/E ratio is 9.49. In terms of profitability, SHOE's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LULU's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOE is less volatile compared to LULU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOE.Check LULU's competition here
SHOE vs GPS Comparison July 2026
SHOE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHOE stands at 433.9M. In comparison, GPS has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOE is priced at $15.98, while GPS trades at $24.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHOE currently has a P/E ratio of 28.54, whereas GPS's P/E ratio is 13.64. In terms of profitability, SHOE's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GPS's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOE is less volatile compared to GPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOE.Check GPS's competition here
SHOE vs GAP Comparison July 2026
SHOE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHOE stands at 433.9M. In comparison, GAP has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOE is priced at $15.98, while GAP trades at $20.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHOE currently has a P/E ratio of 28.54, whereas GAP's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, SHOE's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GAP's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOE is more volatile compared to GAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOE.Check GAP's competition here
SHOE vs VSCO Comparison July 2026
SHOE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHOE stands at 433.9M. In comparison, VSCO has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOE is priced at $15.98, while VSCO trades at $88.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHOE currently has a P/E ratio of 28.54, whereas VSCO's P/E ratio is 44.14. In terms of profitability, SHOE's ROE is +0.05%, compared to VSCO's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOE is less volatile compared to VSCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOE.Check VSCO's competition here
SHOE vs URBN Comparison July 2026
SHOE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHOE stands at 433.9M. In comparison, URBN has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOE is priced at $15.98, while URBN trades at $73.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHOE currently has a P/E ratio of 28.54, whereas URBN's P/E ratio is 13.16. In terms of profitability, SHOE's ROE is +0.05%, compared to URBN's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOE is less volatile compared to URBN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOE.Check URBN's competition here
SHOE vs BOOT Comparison July 2026
SHOE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHOE stands at 433.9M. In comparison, BOOT has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOE is priced at $15.98, while BOOT trades at $177.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHOE currently has a P/E ratio of 28.54, whereas BOOT's P/E ratio is 24.16. In terms of profitability, SHOE's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BOOT's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOE is less volatile compared to BOOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOE.Check BOOT's competition here
SHOE vs ANF Comparison July 2026
SHOE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHOE stands at 433.9M. In comparison, ANF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOE is priced at $15.98, while ANF trades at $91.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHOE currently has a P/E ratio of 28.54, whereas ANF's P/E ratio is 9.30. In terms of profitability, SHOE's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ANF's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOE is less volatile compared to ANF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOE.Check ANF's competition here
SHOE vs AEO Comparison July 2026
SHOE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHOE stands at 433.9M. In comparison, AEO has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOE is priced at $15.98, while AEO trades at $17.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHOE currently has a P/E ratio of 28.54, whereas AEO's P/E ratio is 11.03. In terms of profitability, SHOE's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AEO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOE is less volatile compared to AEO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOE.Check AEO's competition here
SHOE vs FL Comparison July 2026
SHOE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHOE stands at 433.9M. In comparison, FL has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOE is priced at $15.98, while FL trades at $24.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHOE currently has a P/E ratio of 28.54, whereas FL's P/E ratio is -6.05. In terms of profitability, SHOE's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FL's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOE is more volatile compared to FL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOE.Check FL's competition here
SHOE vs BKE Comparison July 2026
SHOE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHOE stands at 433.9M. In comparison, BKE has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOE is priced at $15.98, while BKE trades at $43.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHOE currently has a P/E ratio of 28.54, whereas BKE's P/E ratio is 9.90. In terms of profitability, SHOE's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BKE's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOE is less volatile compared to BKE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOE.Check BKE's competition here
SHOE vs HIBB Comparison July 2026
SHOE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHOE stands at 433.9M. In comparison, HIBB has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOE is priced at $15.98, while HIBB trades at $87.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHOE currently has a P/E ratio of 28.54, whereas HIBB's P/E ratio is 10.80. In terms of profitability, SHOE's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HIBB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOE is more volatile compared to HIBB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOE.Check HIBB's competition here
SHOE vs CHS Comparison July 2026
SHOE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHOE stands at 433.9M. In comparison, CHS has a market cap of 937M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOE is priced at $15.98, while CHS trades at $7.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHOE currently has a P/E ratio of 28.54, whereas CHS's P/E ratio is 8.34. In terms of profitability, SHOE's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CHS's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOE is more volatile compared to CHS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOE.Check CHS's competition here
SHOE vs GES Comparison July 2026
SHOE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHOE stands at 433.9M. In comparison, GES has a market cap of 876.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOE is priced at $15.98, while GES trades at $16.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHOE currently has a P/E ratio of 28.54, whereas GES's P/E ratio is 14.49. In terms of profitability, SHOE's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GES's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOE is more volatile compared to GES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOE.Check GES's competition here
SHOE vs SFIX Comparison July 2026
SHOE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHOE stands at 433.9M. In comparison, SFIX has a market cap of 605.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOE is priced at $15.98, while SFIX trades at $4.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHOE currently has a P/E ratio of 28.54, whereas SFIX's P/E ratio is -30.27. In terms of profitability, SHOE's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SFIX's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOE is less volatile compared to SFIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOE.Check SFIX's competition here
SHOE vs CTRN Comparison July 2026
SHOE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHOE stands at 433.9M. In comparison, CTRN has a market cap of 492.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOE is priced at $15.98, while CTRN trades at $59.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHOE currently has a P/E ratio of 28.54, whereas CTRN's P/E ratio is 257.04. In terms of profitability, SHOE's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CTRN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOE is less volatile compared to CTRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOE.Check CTRN's competition here
SHOE vs SCVL Comparison July 2026
SHOE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHOE stands at 433.9M. In comparison, SCVL has a market cap of 433.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOE is priced at $15.98, while SCVL trades at $15.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHOE currently has a P/E ratio of 28.54, whereas SCVL's P/E ratio is 11.81. In terms of profitability, SHOE's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SCVL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOE and SCVL have similar daily volatility (2.98).Check SCVL's competition here
SHOE vs GCO Comparison July 2026
SHOE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHOE stands at 433.9M. In comparison, GCO has a market cap of 402.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOE is priced at $15.98, while GCO trades at $36.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHOE currently has a P/E ratio of 28.54, whereas GCO's P/E ratio is 29.93. In terms of profitability, SHOE's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GCO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOE is less volatile compared to GCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOE.Check GCO's competition here
SHOE vs DBI Comparison July 2026
SHOE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHOE stands at 433.9M. In comparison, DBI has a market cap of 316.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOE is priced at $15.98, while DBI trades at $6.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHOE currently has a P/E ratio of 28.54, whereas DBI's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, SHOE's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DBI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOE is less volatile compared to DBI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOE.Check DBI's competition here
SHOE vs ZUMZ Comparison July 2026
SHOE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHOE stands at 433.9M. In comparison, ZUMZ has a market cap of 307.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOE is priced at $15.98, while ZUMZ trades at $18.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHOE currently has a P/E ratio of 28.54, whereas ZUMZ's P/E ratio is 24.66. In terms of profitability, SHOE's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ZUMZ's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOE is more volatile compared to ZUMZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOE.Check ZUMZ's competition here
SHOE vs CURV Comparison July 2026
SHOE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHOE stands at 433.9M. In comparison, CURV has a market cap of 197.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOE is priced at $15.98, while CURV trades at $1.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHOE currently has a P/E ratio of 28.54, whereas CURV's P/E ratio is -17.09. In terms of profitability, SHOE's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CURV's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOE is less volatile compared to CURV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOE.Check CURV's competition here
SHOE vs JILL Comparison July 2026
SHOE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHOE stands at 433.9M. In comparison, JILL has a market cap of 178.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOE is priced at $15.98, while JILL trades at $15.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHOE currently has a P/E ratio of 28.54, whereas JILL's P/E ratio is 7.88. In terms of profitability, SHOE's ROE is +0.05%, compared to JILL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOE is less volatile compared to JILL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOE.Check JILL's competition here
SHOE vs DLTH Comparison July 2026
SHOE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHOE stands at 433.9M. In comparison, DLTH has a market cap of 160.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOE is priced at $15.98, while DLTH trades at $4.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHOE currently has a P/E ratio of 28.54, whereas DLTH's P/E ratio is -24.88. In terms of profitability, SHOE's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DLTH's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOE is less volatile compared to DLTH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOE.Check DLTH's competition here
SHOE vs TLYS Comparison July 2026
SHOE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHOE stands at 433.9M. In comparison, TLYS has a market cap of 123.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOE is priced at $15.98, while TLYS trades at $4.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHOE currently has a P/E ratio of 28.54, whereas TLYS's P/E ratio is -37.23. In terms of profitability, SHOE's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TLYS's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOE is less volatile compared to TLYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOE.Check TLYS's competition here
SHOE vs AKA Comparison July 2026
SHOE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHOE stands at 433.9M. In comparison, AKA has a market cap of 109.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOE is priced at $15.98, while AKA trades at $10.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHOE currently has a P/E ratio of 28.54, whereas AKA's P/E ratio is -4.49. In terms of profitability, SHOE's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AKA's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOE is less volatile compared to AKA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOE.Check AKA's competition here
SHOE vs PLCE Comparison July 2026
SHOE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHOE stands at 433.9M. In comparison, PLCE has a market cap of 62.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOE is priced at $15.98, while PLCE trades at $2.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHOE currently has a P/E ratio of 28.54, whereas PLCE's P/E ratio is -0.62. In terms of profitability, SHOE's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PLCE's ROE of +2.46%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOE is less volatile compared to PLCE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOE.Check PLCE's competition here
SHOE vs CATO Comparison July 2026
SHOE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHOE stands at 433.9M. In comparison, CATO has a market cap of 58.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOE is priced at $15.98, while CATO trades at $3.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHOE currently has a P/E ratio of 28.54, whereas CATO's P/E ratio is -320.00. In terms of profitability, SHOE's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CATO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOE is less volatile compared to CATO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOE.Check CATO's competition here
SHOE vs DXLG Comparison July 2026
SHOE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHOE stands at 433.9M. In comparison, DXLG has a market cap of 35.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOE is priced at $15.98, while DXLG trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHOE currently has a P/E ratio of 28.54, whereas DXLG's P/E ratio is -2.60. In terms of profitability, SHOE's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DXLG's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOE is less volatile compared to DXLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOE.Check DXLG's competition here
SHOE vs DBGIW Comparison July 2026
SHOE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHOE stands at 433.9M. In comparison, DBGIW has a market cap of 30.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOE is priced at $15.98, while DBGIW trades at $16.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHOE currently has a P/E ratio of 28.54, whereas DBGIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHOE's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DBGIW's ROE of -4.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOE is less volatile compared to DBGIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOE.Check DBGIW's competition here
SHOE vs LVLU Comparison July 2026
SHOE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHOE stands at 433.9M. In comparison, LVLU has a market cap of 22.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOE is priced at $15.98, while LVLU trades at $7.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHOE currently has a P/E ratio of 28.54, whereas LVLU's P/E ratio is -2.23. In terms of profitability, SHOE's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LVLU's ROE of -4.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOE is less volatile compared to LVLU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOE.Check LVLU's competition here
SHOE vs RENT Comparison July 2026
SHOE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHOE stands at 433.9M. In comparison, RENT has a market cap of 14.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOE is priced at $15.98, while RENT trades at $3.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHOE currently has a P/E ratio of 28.54, whereas RENT's P/E ratio is 0.49. In terms of profitability, SHOE's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RENT's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOE is less volatile compared to RENT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOE.Check RENT's competition here
SHOE vs DBGI Comparison July 2026
SHOE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHOE stands at 433.9M. In comparison, DBGI has a market cap of 5.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOE is priced at $15.98, while DBGI trades at $0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHOE currently has a P/E ratio of 28.54, whereas DBGI's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, SHOE's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DBGI's ROE of -4.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOE is less volatile compared to DBGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOE.Check DBGI's competition here
SHOE vs EXPR Comparison July 2026
SHOE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHOE stands at 433.9M. In comparison, EXPR has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOE is priced at $15.98, while EXPR trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHOE currently has a P/E ratio of 28.54, whereas EXPR's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, SHOE's ROE is +0.05%, compared to EXPR's ROE of +1.90%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOE is less volatile compared to EXPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOE.Check EXPR's competition here
SHOE vs JEM Comparison July 2026
SHOE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHOE stands at 433.9M. In comparison, JEM has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOE is priced at $15.98, while JEM trades at $1.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHOE currently has a P/E ratio of 28.54, whereas JEM's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, SHOE's ROE is +0.05%, compared to JEM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SHOE is less volatile compared to JEM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOE.Check JEM's competition here
SHOE vs LDG Comparison July 2026
SHOE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHOE stands at 433.9M. In comparison, LDG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SHOE is priced at $15.98, while LDG trades at $20,900.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHOE currently has a P/E ratio of 28.54, whereas LDG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHOE's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LDG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SHOE is less volatile compared to LDG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOE.Check LDG's competition here
SHOE vs PSUN Comparison July 2026
SHOE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHOE stands at 433.9M. In comparison, PSUN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SHOE is priced at $15.98, while PSUN trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHOE currently has a P/E ratio of 28.54, whereas PSUN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHOE's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PSUN's ROE of -1.71%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOE is less volatile compared to PSUN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOE.Check PSUN's competition here
SHOE vs COX Comparison July 2026
SHOE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHOE stands at 433.9M. In comparison, COX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SHOE is priced at $15.98, while COX trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHOE currently has a P/E ratio of 28.54, whereas COX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHOE's ROE is +0.05%, compared to COX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SHOE is less volatile compared to COX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOE.Check COX's competition here
SHOE vs FINL Comparison July 2026
SHOE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHOE stands at 433.9M. In comparison, FINL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SHOE is priced at $15.98, while FINL trades at $13.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHOE currently has a P/E ratio of 28.54, whereas FINL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHOE's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FINL's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOE is more volatile compared to FINL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOE.Check FINL's competition here
SHOE vs TSA Comparison July 2026
SHOE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHOE stands at 433.9M. In comparison, TSA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SHOE is priced at $15.98, while TSA trades at $20.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHOE currently has a P/E ratio of 28.54, whereas TSA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHOE's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TSA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SHOE is more volatile compared to TSA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOE.Check TSA's competition here
SHOE vs CLE Comparison July 2026
SHOE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SHOE stands at 433.9M. In comparison, CLE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SHOE is priced at $15.98, while CLE trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SHOE currently has a P/E ratio of 28.54, whereas CLE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHOE's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CLE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SHOE is more volatile compared to CLE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOE.Check CLE's competition here