Chico's FAS, Inc.
Chico's FAS, Inc. (CHS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CHS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Apparel - Retail Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHS | $7.59 | -0.13% | 937M | 8.34 | $0.91 | N/A |
| TJX | $157.03 | -0.83% | 174.4B | 32.24 | $4.87 | +1.08% |
| ROST | $226.37 | -0.24% | 73.2B | 34.25 | $6.61 | +0.73% |
| BURL | $331.77 | +0.65% | 20.9B | 34.94 | $9.50 | N/A |
| LULU | $143.80 | +1.51% | 16.9B | 10.84 | $13.26 | N/A |
| ONON | $36.25 | +0.08% | 12B | 47.69 | $0.76 | N/A |
| GAP | $24.99 | -0.85% | 9.3B | 11.72 | $2.13 | +2.69% |
| GPS | $24.55 | +4.38% | 9.2B | 13.64 | $1.80 | +2.44% |
| URBN | $73.64 | -0.28% | 6.6B | 14.55 | $5.06 | N/A |
| BOOT | $168.69 | +3.37% | 5.1B | 23.66 | $7.13 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
CHS vs TJX Comparison April 2026
CHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHS stands at 937M. In comparison, TJX has a market cap of 174.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CHS is priced at $7.59, while TJX trades at $157.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.34, whereas TJX's P/E ratio is 32.24. In terms of profitability, CHS's ROE is +0.39%, compared to TJX's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, CHS is less volatile compared to TJX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHS.Check TJX's competition here
CHS vs ROST Comparison April 2026
CHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHS stands at 937M. In comparison, ROST has a market cap of 73.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CHS is priced at $7.59, while ROST trades at $226.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.34, whereas ROST's P/E ratio is 34.25. In terms of profitability, CHS's ROE is +0.39%, compared to ROST's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CHS is less volatile compared to ROST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHS.Check ROST's competition here
CHS vs BURL Comparison April 2026
CHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHS stands at 937M. In comparison, BURL has a market cap of 20.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CHS is priced at $7.59, while BURL trades at $331.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.34, whereas BURL's P/E ratio is 34.94. In terms of profitability, CHS's ROE is +0.39%, compared to BURL's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CHS is less volatile compared to BURL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHS.Check BURL's competition here
CHS vs LULU Comparison April 2026
CHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHS stands at 937M. In comparison, LULU has a market cap of 16.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CHS is priced at $7.59, while LULU trades at $143.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.34, whereas LULU's P/E ratio is 10.84. In terms of profitability, CHS's ROE is +0.39%, compared to LULU's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, CHS is less volatile compared to LULU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHS.Check LULU's competition here
CHS vs ONON Comparison April 2026
CHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHS stands at 937M. In comparison, ONON has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, CHS is priced at $7.59, while ONON trades at $36.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.34, whereas ONON's P/E ratio is 47.69. In terms of profitability, CHS's ROE is +0.39%, compared to ONON's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CHS is less volatile compared to ONON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHS.Check ONON's competition here
CHS vs GAP Comparison April 2026
CHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHS stands at 937M. In comparison, GAP has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CHS is priced at $7.59, while GAP trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.34, whereas GAP's P/E ratio is 11.72. In terms of profitability, CHS's ROE is +0.39%, compared to GAP's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CHS is less volatile compared to GAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHS.Check GAP's competition here
CHS vs GPS Comparison April 2026
CHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHS stands at 937M. In comparison, GPS has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CHS is priced at $7.59, while GPS trades at $24.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.34, whereas GPS's P/E ratio is 13.64. In terms of profitability, CHS's ROE is +0.39%, compared to GPS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CHS is less volatile compared to GPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHS.Check GPS's competition here
CHS vs URBN Comparison April 2026
CHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHS stands at 937M. In comparison, URBN has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CHS is priced at $7.59, while URBN trades at $73.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.34, whereas URBN's P/E ratio is 14.55. In terms of profitability, CHS's ROE is +0.39%, compared to URBN's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CHS is less volatile compared to URBN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHS.Check URBN's competition here
CHS vs BOOT Comparison April 2026
CHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHS stands at 937M. In comparison, BOOT has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CHS is priced at $7.59, while BOOT trades at $168.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.34, whereas BOOT's P/E ratio is 23.66. In terms of profitability, CHS's ROE is +0.39%, compared to BOOT's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CHS is less volatile compared to BOOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHS.Check BOOT's competition here
CHS vs VSCO Comparison April 2026
CHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHS stands at 937M. In comparison, VSCO has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CHS is priced at $7.59, while VSCO trades at $52.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.34, whereas VSCO's P/E ratio is 27.37. In terms of profitability, CHS's ROE is +0.39%, compared to VSCO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CHS is less volatile compared to VSCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHS.Check VSCO's competition here
CHS vs ANF Comparison April 2026
CHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHS stands at 937M. In comparison, ANF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CHS is priced at $7.59, while ANF trades at $87.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.34, whereas ANF's P/E ratio is 8.32. In terms of profitability, CHS's ROE is +0.39%, compared to ANF's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, CHS is less volatile compared to ANF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHS.Check ANF's competition here
CHS vs AEO Comparison April 2026
CHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHS stands at 937M. In comparison, AEO has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, CHS is priced at $7.59, while AEO trades at $17.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.34, whereas AEO's P/E ratio is 16.42. In terms of profitability, CHS's ROE is +0.39%, compared to AEO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CHS is less volatile compared to AEO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHS.Check AEO's competition here
CHS vs BKE Comparison April 2026
CHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHS stands at 937M. In comparison, BKE has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CHS is priced at $7.59, while BKE trades at $56.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.34, whereas BKE's P/E ratio is 13.57. In terms of profitability, CHS's ROE is +0.39%, compared to BKE's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, CHS is less volatile compared to BKE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHS.Check BKE's competition here
CHS vs FL Comparison April 2026
CHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHS stands at 937M. In comparison, FL has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CHS is priced at $7.59, while FL trades at $24.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.34, whereas FL's P/E ratio is -6.05. In terms of profitability, CHS's ROE is +0.39%, compared to FL's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CHS is less volatile compared to FL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHS.Check FL's competition here
CHS vs CRI Comparison April 2026
CHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHS stands at 937M. In comparison, CRI has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CHS is priced at $7.59, while CRI trades at $37.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.34, whereas CRI's P/E ratio is 14.72. In terms of profitability, CHS's ROE is +0.39%, compared to CRI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CHS is less volatile compared to CRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHS.Check CRI's competition here
CHS vs HIBB Comparison April 2026
CHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHS stands at 937M. In comparison, HIBB has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, CHS is priced at $7.59, while HIBB trades at $87.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.34, whereas HIBB's P/E ratio is 10.80. In terms of profitability, CHS's ROE is +0.39%, compared to HIBB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CHS is more volatile compared to HIBB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHS.Check HIBB's competition here
CHS vs GES Comparison April 2026
CHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHS stands at 937M. In comparison, GES has a market cap of 876.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CHS is priced at $7.59, while GES trades at $16.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.34, whereas GES's P/E ratio is 14.49. In terms of profitability, CHS's ROE is +0.39%, compared to GES's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CHS is less volatile compared to GES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHS.Check GES's competition here
CHS vs SFIX Comparison April 2026
CHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHS stands at 937M. In comparison, SFIX has a market cap of 525.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CHS is priced at $7.59, while SFIX trades at $3.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.34, whereas SFIX's P/E ratio is -20.26. In terms of profitability, CHS's ROE is +0.39%, compared to SFIX's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CHS is less volatile compared to SFIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHS.Check SFIX's competition here
CHS vs SCVL Comparison April 2026
CHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHS stands at 937M. In comparison, SCVL has a market cap of 513.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CHS is priced at $7.59, while SCVL trades at $18.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.34, whereas SCVL's P/E ratio is 9.84. In terms of profitability, CHS's ROE is +0.39%, compared to SCVL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CHS is less volatile compared to SCVL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHS.Check SCVL's competition here
CHS vs CTRN Comparison April 2026
CHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHS stands at 937M. In comparison, CTRN has a market cap of 422.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CHS is priced at $7.59, while CTRN trades at $50.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.34, whereas CTRN's P/E ratio is 80.41. In terms of profitability, CHS's ROE is +0.39%, compared to CTRN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CHS is less volatile compared to CTRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHS.Check CTRN's competition here
CHS vs ZUMZ Comparison April 2026
CHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHS stands at 937M. In comparison, ZUMZ has a market cap of 416.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CHS is priced at $7.59, while ZUMZ trades at $24.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.34, whereas ZUMZ's P/E ratio is 31.49. In terms of profitability, CHS's ROE is +0.39%, compared to ZUMZ's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CHS is less volatile compared to ZUMZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHS.Check ZUMZ's competition here
CHS vs DBI Comparison April 2026
CHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHS stands at 937M. In comparison, DBI has a market cap of 410.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CHS is priced at $7.59, while DBI trades at $8.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.34, whereas DBI's P/E ratio is -47.65. In terms of profitability, CHS's ROE is +0.39%, compared to DBI's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CHS is less volatile compared to DBI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHS.Check DBI's competition here
CHS vs GCO Comparison April 2026
CHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHS stands at 937M. In comparison, GCO has a market cap of 381.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CHS is priced at $7.59, while GCO trades at $35.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.34, whereas GCO's P/E ratio is 28.14. In terms of profitability, CHS's ROE is +0.39%, compared to GCO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CHS is less volatile compared to GCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHS.Check GCO's competition here
CHS vs CURV Comparison April 2026
CHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHS stands at 937M. In comparison, CURV has a market cap of 181.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CHS is priced at $7.59, while CURV trades at $1.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.34, whereas CURV's P/E ratio is -26.07. In terms of profitability, CHS's ROE is +0.39%, compared to CURV's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CHS is less volatile compared to CURV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHS.Check CURV's competition here
CHS vs JILL Comparison April 2026
CHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHS stands at 937M. In comparison, JILL has a market cap of 149.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CHS is priced at $7.59, while JILL trades at $13.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.34, whereas JILL's P/E ratio is 7.25. In terms of profitability, CHS's ROE is +0.39%, compared to JILL's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CHS is less volatile compared to JILL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHS.Check JILL's competition here
CHS vs DLTH Comparison April 2026
CHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHS stands at 937M. In comparison, DLTH has a market cap of 132.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CHS is priced at $7.59, while DLTH trades at $3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.34, whereas DLTH's P/E ratio is -7.66. In terms of profitability, CHS's ROE is +0.39%, compared to DLTH's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CHS is less volatile compared to DLTH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHS.Check DLTH's competition here
CHS vs TLYS Comparison April 2026
CHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHS stands at 937M. In comparison, TLYS has a market cap of 121M. Regarding current trading prices, CHS is priced at $7.59, while TLYS trades at $3.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.34, whereas TLYS's P/E ratio is -6.93. In terms of profitability, CHS's ROE is +0.39%, compared to TLYS's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CHS is less volatile compared to TLYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHS.Check TLYS's competition here
CHS vs PLCE Comparison April 2026
CHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHS stands at 937M. In comparison, PLCE has a market cap of 74.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CHS is priced at $7.59, while PLCE trades at $3.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.34, whereas PLCE's P/E ratio is -0.84. In terms of profitability, CHS's ROE is +0.39%, compared to PLCE's ROE of +5.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CHS is less volatile compared to PLCE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHS.Check PLCE's competition here
CHS vs CATO Comparison April 2026
CHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHS stands at 937M. In comparison, CATO has a market cap of 52M. Regarding current trading prices, CHS is priced at $7.59, while CATO trades at $2.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.34, whereas CATO's P/E ratio is -9.32. In terms of profitability, CHS's ROE is +0.39%, compared to CATO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CHS is less volatile compared to CATO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHS.Check CATO's competition here
CHS vs DXLG Comparison April 2026
CHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHS stands at 937M. In comparison, DXLG has a market cap of 38M. Regarding current trading prices, CHS is priced at $7.59, while DXLG trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.34, whereas DXLG's P/E ratio is -1.05. In terms of profitability, CHS's ROE is +0.39%, compared to DXLG's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CHS is less volatile compared to DXLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHS.Check DXLG's competition here
CHS vs DBGIW Comparison April 2026
CHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHS stands at 937M. In comparison, DBGIW has a market cap of 30.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CHS is priced at $7.59, while DBGIW trades at $16.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.34, whereas DBGIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CHS's ROE is +0.39%, compared to DBGIW's ROE of -2.97%. Regarding short-term risk, CHS is less volatile compared to DBGIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHS.Check DBGIW's competition here
CHS vs LVLU Comparison April 2026
CHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHS stands at 937M. In comparison, LVLU has a market cap of 27.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CHS is priced at $7.59, while LVLU trades at $9.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.34, whereas LVLU's P/E ratio is -1.94. In terms of profitability, CHS's ROE is +0.39%, compared to LVLU's ROE of -3.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CHS is less volatile compared to LVLU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHS.Check LVLU's competition here
CHS vs RENT Comparison April 2026
CHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHS stands at 937M. In comparison, RENT has a market cap of 21.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CHS is priced at $7.59, while RENT trades at $4.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.34, whereas RENT's P/E ratio is 2.63. In terms of profitability, CHS's ROE is +0.39%, compared to RENT's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CHS is less volatile compared to RENT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHS.Check RENT's competition here
CHS vs DBGI Comparison April 2026
CHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHS stands at 937M. In comparison, DBGI has a market cap of 11.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CHS is priced at $7.59, while DBGI trades at $1.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.34, whereas DBGI's P/E ratio is -0.66. In terms of profitability, CHS's ROE is +0.39%, compared to DBGI's ROE of -2.97%. Regarding short-term risk, CHS is less volatile compared to DBGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHS.Check DBGI's competition here
CHS vs EXPR Comparison April 2026
CHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHS stands at 937M. In comparison, EXPR has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CHS is priced at $7.59, while EXPR trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.34, whereas EXPR's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, CHS's ROE is +0.39%, compared to EXPR's ROE of +1.90%. Regarding short-term risk, CHS is less volatile compared to EXPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHS.Check EXPR's competition here
CHS vs JEM Comparison April 2026
CHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHS stands at 937M. In comparison, JEM has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CHS is priced at $7.59, while JEM trades at $1.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.34, whereas JEM's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, CHS's ROE is +0.39%, compared to JEM's ROE of +1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CHS is less volatile compared to JEM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHS.Check JEM's competition here
CHS vs CLE Comparison April 2026
CHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHS stands at 937M. In comparison, CLE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CHS is priced at $7.59, while CLE trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.34, whereas CLE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CHS's ROE is +0.39%, compared to CLE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CHS is more volatile compared to CLE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHS.Check CLE's competition here
CHS vs TSA Comparison April 2026
CHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHS stands at 937M. In comparison, TSA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CHS is priced at $7.59, while TSA trades at $20.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.34, whereas TSA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CHS's ROE is +0.39%, compared to TSA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CHS is less volatile compared to TSA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHS.Check TSA's competition here
CHS vs FINL Comparison April 2026
CHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHS stands at 937M. In comparison, FINL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CHS is priced at $7.59, while FINL trades at $13.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.34, whereas FINL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CHS's ROE is +0.39%, compared to FINL's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CHS is more volatile compared to FINL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHS.Check FINL's competition here
CHS vs COX Comparison April 2026
CHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHS stands at 937M. In comparison, COX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CHS is priced at $7.59, while COX trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.34, whereas COX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CHS's ROE is +0.39%, compared to COX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CHS is less volatile compared to COX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHS.Check COX's competition here
CHS vs LDG Comparison April 2026
CHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHS stands at 937M. In comparison, LDG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CHS is priced at $7.59, while LDG trades at $20,900.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.34, whereas LDG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CHS's ROE is +0.39%, compared to LDG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CHS is less volatile compared to LDG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHS.Check LDG's competition here