Chico's FAS, Inc. (CHS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CHS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Apparel - Retail Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHS | $7.59 | -0.13% | 937M | 8.34 | $0.91 | N/A |
| TJX | $149.95 | -3.53% | 167.1B | 30.25 | $5.00 | +1.16% |
| ROST | $206.23 | -3.30% | 67B | 29.17 | $7.16 | +0.82% |
| BURL | $311.01 | -3.04% | 19.8B | 30.54 | $10.29 | N/A |
| LULU | $112.26 | -4.52% | 13B | 9.22 | $12.39 | N/A |
| GPS | $24.55 | +4.38% | 9.2B | 13.64 | $1.80 | +2.44% |
| VSCO | $83.56 | -5.58% | 6.9B | 44.77 | $1.93 | N/A |
| GAP | $18.34 | -9.25% | 6.7B | 9.28 | $2.02 | +3.57% |
| URBN | $70.40 | -4.27% | 6.1B | 12.78 | $5.59 | N/A |
| BOOT | $161.67 | -8.96% | 5B | 22.30 | $7.35 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
CHS vs TJX Comparison July 2026
CHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHS stands at 937M. In comparison, TJX has a market cap of 167.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CHS is priced at $7.59, while TJX trades at $149.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.34, whereas TJX's P/E ratio is 30.25. In terms of profitability, CHS's ROE is +0.39%, compared to TJX's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, CHS is less volatile compared to TJX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHS.Check TJX's competition here
CHS vs ROST Comparison July 2026
CHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHS stands at 937M. In comparison, ROST has a market cap of 67B. Regarding current trading prices, CHS is priced at $7.59, while ROST trades at $206.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.34, whereas ROST's P/E ratio is 29.17. In terms of profitability, CHS's ROE is +0.39%, compared to ROST's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CHS is less volatile compared to ROST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHS.Check ROST's competition here
CHS vs BURL Comparison July 2026
CHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHS stands at 937M. In comparison, BURL has a market cap of 19.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CHS is priced at $7.59, while BURL trades at $311.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.34, whereas BURL's P/E ratio is 30.54. In terms of profitability, CHS's ROE is +0.39%, compared to BURL's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CHS is less volatile compared to BURL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHS.Check BURL's competition here
CHS vs LULU Comparison July 2026
CHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHS stands at 937M. In comparison, LULU has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, CHS is priced at $7.59, while LULU trades at $112.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.34, whereas LULU's P/E ratio is 9.22. In terms of profitability, CHS's ROE is +0.39%, compared to LULU's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CHS is less volatile compared to LULU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHS.Check LULU's competition here
CHS vs GPS Comparison July 2026
CHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHS stands at 937M. In comparison, GPS has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CHS is priced at $7.59, while GPS trades at $24.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.34, whereas GPS's P/E ratio is 13.64. In terms of profitability, CHS's ROE is +0.39%, compared to GPS's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CHS is less volatile compared to GPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHS.Check GPS's competition here
CHS vs VSCO Comparison July 2026
CHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHS stands at 937M. In comparison, VSCO has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CHS is priced at $7.59, while VSCO trades at $83.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.34, whereas VSCO's P/E ratio is 44.77. In terms of profitability, CHS's ROE is +0.39%, compared to VSCO's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CHS is less volatile compared to VSCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHS.Check VSCO's competition here
CHS vs GAP Comparison July 2026
CHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHS stands at 937M. In comparison, GAP has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CHS is priced at $7.59, while GAP trades at $18.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.34, whereas GAP's P/E ratio is 9.28. In terms of profitability, CHS's ROE is +0.39%, compared to GAP's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CHS is less volatile compared to GAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHS.Check GAP's competition here
CHS vs URBN Comparison July 2026
CHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHS stands at 937M. In comparison, URBN has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CHS is priced at $7.59, while URBN trades at $70.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.34, whereas URBN's P/E ratio is 12.78. In terms of profitability, CHS's ROE is +0.39%, compared to URBN's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CHS is less volatile compared to URBN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHS.Check URBN's competition here
CHS vs BOOT Comparison July 2026
CHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHS stands at 937M. In comparison, BOOT has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, CHS is priced at $7.59, while BOOT trades at $161.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.34, whereas BOOT's P/E ratio is 22.30. In terms of profitability, CHS's ROE is +0.39%, compared to BOOT's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CHS is less volatile compared to BOOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHS.Check BOOT's competition here
CHS vs ANF Comparison July 2026
CHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHS stands at 937M. In comparison, ANF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, CHS is priced at $7.59, while ANF trades at $87.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.34, whereas ANF's P/E ratio is 9.09. In terms of profitability, CHS's ROE is +0.39%, compared to ANF's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CHS is less volatile compared to ANF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHS.Check ANF's competition here
CHS vs AEO Comparison July 2026
CHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHS stands at 937M. In comparison, AEO has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CHS is priced at $7.59, while AEO trades at $16.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.34, whereas AEO's P/E ratio is 10.54. In terms of profitability, CHS's ROE is +0.39%, compared to AEO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CHS is less volatile compared to AEO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHS.Check AEO's competition here
CHS vs FL Comparison July 2026
CHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHS stands at 937M. In comparison, FL has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CHS is priced at $7.59, while FL trades at $24.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.34, whereas FL's P/E ratio is -6.05. In terms of profitability, CHS's ROE is +0.39%, compared to FL's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CHS is less volatile compared to FL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHS.Check FL's competition here
CHS vs BKE Comparison July 2026
CHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHS stands at 937M. In comparison, BKE has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CHS is priced at $7.59, while BKE trades at $41.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.34, whereas BKE's P/E ratio is 9.54. In terms of profitability, CHS's ROE is +0.39%, compared to BKE's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, CHS is less volatile compared to BKE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHS.Check BKE's competition here
CHS vs HIBB Comparison July 2026
CHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHS stands at 937M. In comparison, HIBB has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, CHS is priced at $7.59, while HIBB trades at $87.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.34, whereas HIBB's P/E ratio is 10.80. In terms of profitability, CHS's ROE is +0.39%, compared to HIBB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CHS is more volatile compared to HIBB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHS.Check HIBB's competition here
CHS vs GES Comparison July 2026
CHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHS stands at 937M. In comparison, GES has a market cap of 876.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CHS is priced at $7.59, while GES trades at $16.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.34, whereas GES's P/E ratio is 14.49. In terms of profitability, CHS's ROE is +0.39%, compared to GES's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CHS is less volatile compared to GES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHS.Check GES's competition here
CHS vs SFIX Comparison July 2026
CHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHS stands at 937M. In comparison, SFIX has a market cap of 584.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CHS is priced at $7.59, while SFIX trades at $4.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.34, whereas SFIX's P/E ratio is -29.20. In terms of profitability, CHS's ROE is +0.39%, compared to SFIX's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CHS is less volatile compared to SFIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHS.Check SFIX's competition here
CHS vs CTRN Comparison July 2026
CHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHS stands at 937M. In comparison, CTRN has a market cap of 465.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CHS is priced at $7.59, while CTRN trades at $55.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.34, whereas CTRN's P/E ratio is 243.07. In terms of profitability, CHS's ROE is +0.39%, compared to CTRN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CHS is less volatile compared to CTRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHS.Check CTRN's competition here
CHS vs SCVL Comparison July 2026
CHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHS stands at 937M. In comparison, SCVL has a market cap of 420.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CHS is priced at $7.59, while SCVL trades at $15.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.34, whereas SCVL's P/E ratio is 11.48. In terms of profitability, CHS's ROE is +0.39%, compared to SCVL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CHS is less volatile compared to SCVL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHS.Check SCVL's competition here
CHS vs SHOE Comparison July 2026
CHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHS stands at 937M. In comparison, SHOE has a market cap of 420.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CHS is priced at $7.59, while SHOE trades at $14.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.34, whereas SHOE's P/E ratio is 27.64. In terms of profitability, CHS's ROE is +0.39%, compared to SHOE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CHS is less volatile compared to SHOE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHS.Check SHOE's competition here
CHS vs GCO Comparison July 2026
CHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHS stands at 937M. In comparison, GCO has a market cap of 386.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CHS is priced at $7.59, while GCO trades at $34.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.34, whereas GCO's P/E ratio is 28.78. In terms of profitability, CHS's ROE is +0.39%, compared to GCO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CHS is less volatile compared to GCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHS.Check GCO's competition here
CHS vs DBI Comparison July 2026
CHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHS stands at 937M. In comparison, DBI has a market cap of 305.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CHS is priced at $7.59, while DBI trades at $5.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.34, whereas DBI's P/E ratio is 12.54. In terms of profitability, CHS's ROE is +0.39%, compared to DBI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CHS is less volatile compared to DBI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHS.Check DBI's competition here
CHS vs ZUMZ Comparison July 2026
CHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHS stands at 937M. In comparison, ZUMZ has a market cap of 299.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CHS is priced at $7.59, while ZUMZ trades at $17.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.34, whereas ZUMZ's P/E ratio is 23.96. In terms of profitability, CHS's ROE is +0.39%, compared to ZUMZ's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CHS is less volatile compared to ZUMZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHS.Check ZUMZ's competition here
CHS vs JILL Comparison July 2026
CHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHS stands at 937M. In comparison, JILL has a market cap of 181.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CHS is priced at $7.59, while JILL trades at $15.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.34, whereas JILL's P/E ratio is 8.01. In terms of profitability, CHS's ROE is +0.39%, compared to JILL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CHS is less volatile compared to JILL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHS.Check JILL's competition here
CHS vs CURV Comparison July 2026
CHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHS stands at 937M. In comparison, CURV has a market cap of 177.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CHS is priced at $7.59, while CURV trades at $1.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.34, whereas CURV's P/E ratio is -15.37. In terms of profitability, CHS's ROE is +0.39%, compared to CURV's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CHS is less volatile compared to CURV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHS.Check CURV's competition here
CHS vs DLTH Comparison July 2026
CHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHS stands at 937M. In comparison, DLTH has a market cap of 176.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CHS is priced at $7.59, while DLTH trades at $4.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.34, whereas DLTH's P/E ratio is -27.35. In terms of profitability, CHS's ROE is +0.39%, compared to DLTH's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CHS is less volatile compared to DLTH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHS.Check DLTH's competition here
CHS vs TLYS Comparison July 2026
CHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHS stands at 937M. In comparison, TLYS has a market cap of 116.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CHS is priced at $7.59, while TLYS trades at $4.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.34, whereas TLYS's P/E ratio is -35.09. In terms of profitability, CHS's ROE is +0.39%, compared to TLYS's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CHS is less volatile compared to TLYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHS.Check TLYS's competition here
CHS vs AKA Comparison July 2026
CHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHS stands at 937M. In comparison, AKA has a market cap of 113.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CHS is priced at $7.59, while AKA trades at $10.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.34, whereas AKA's P/E ratio is -4.65. In terms of profitability, CHS's ROE is +0.39%, compared to AKA's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CHS is more volatile compared to AKA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHS.Check AKA's competition here
CHS vs PLCE Comparison July 2026
CHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHS stands at 937M. In comparison, PLCE has a market cap of 66.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CHS is priced at $7.59, while PLCE trades at $2.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.34, whereas PLCE's P/E ratio is -0.66. In terms of profitability, CHS's ROE is +0.39%, compared to PLCE's ROE of +2.46%. Regarding short-term risk, CHS is less volatile compared to PLCE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHS.Check PLCE's competition here
CHS vs CATO Comparison July 2026
CHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHS stands at 937M. In comparison, CATO has a market cap of 58.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CHS is priced at $7.59, while CATO trades at $3.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.34, whereas CATO's P/E ratio is -321.00. In terms of profitability, CHS's ROE is +0.39%, compared to CATO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CHS is more volatile compared to CATO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHS.Check CATO's competition here
CHS vs DXLG Comparison July 2026
CHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHS stands at 937M. In comparison, DXLG has a market cap of 36.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CHS is priced at $7.59, while DXLG trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.34, whereas DXLG's P/E ratio is -2.69. In terms of profitability, CHS's ROE is +0.39%, compared to DXLG's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CHS is less volatile compared to DXLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHS.Check DXLG's competition here
CHS vs DBGIW Comparison July 2026
CHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHS stands at 937M. In comparison, DBGIW has a market cap of 30.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CHS is priced at $7.59, while DBGIW trades at $16.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.34, whereas DBGIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CHS's ROE is +0.39%, compared to DBGIW's ROE of -4.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CHS is less volatile compared to DBGIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHS.Check DBGIW's competition here
CHS vs LVLU Comparison July 2026
CHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHS stands at 937M. In comparison, LVLU has a market cap of 23.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CHS is priced at $7.59, while LVLU trades at $7.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.34, whereas LVLU's P/E ratio is -2.37. In terms of profitability, CHS's ROE is +0.39%, compared to LVLU's ROE of -4.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CHS is more volatile compared to LVLU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHS.Check LVLU's competition here
CHS vs RENT Comparison July 2026
CHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHS stands at 937M. In comparison, RENT has a market cap of 13.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CHS is priced at $7.59, while RENT trades at $3.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.34, whereas RENT's P/E ratio is 0.48. In terms of profitability, CHS's ROE is +0.39%, compared to RENT's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CHS is less volatile compared to RENT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHS.Check RENT's competition here
CHS vs DBGI Comparison July 2026
CHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHS stands at 937M. In comparison, DBGI has a market cap of 6M. Regarding current trading prices, CHS is priced at $7.59, while DBGI trades at $0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.34, whereas DBGI's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, CHS's ROE is +0.39%, compared to DBGI's ROE of -4.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CHS is less volatile compared to DBGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHS.Check DBGI's competition here
CHS vs EXPR Comparison July 2026
CHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHS stands at 937M. In comparison, EXPR has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CHS is priced at $7.59, while EXPR trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.34, whereas EXPR's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, CHS's ROE is +0.39%, compared to EXPR's ROE of +1.90%. Regarding short-term risk, CHS is less volatile compared to EXPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHS.Check EXPR's competition here
CHS vs JEM Comparison July 2026
CHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHS stands at 937M. In comparison, JEM has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CHS is priced at $7.59, while JEM trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.34, whereas JEM's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, CHS's ROE is +0.39%, compared to JEM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CHS is less volatile compared to JEM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHS.Check JEM's competition here
CHS vs TSA Comparison July 2026
CHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHS stands at 937M. In comparison, TSA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CHS is priced at $7.59, while TSA trades at $20.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.34, whereas TSA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CHS's ROE is +0.39%, compared to TSA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CHS is less volatile compared to TSA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHS.Check TSA's competition here
CHS vs LDG Comparison July 2026
CHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHS stands at 937M. In comparison, LDG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CHS is priced at $7.59, while LDG trades at $20,900.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.34, whereas LDG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CHS's ROE is +0.39%, compared to LDG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CHS is less volatile compared to LDG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHS.Check LDG's competition here
CHS vs CLE Comparison July 2026
CHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHS stands at 937M. In comparison, CLE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CHS is priced at $7.59, while CLE trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.34, whereas CLE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CHS's ROE is +0.39%, compared to CLE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CHS is more volatile compared to CLE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHS.Check CLE's competition here
CHS vs FINL Comparison July 2026
CHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHS stands at 937M. In comparison, FINL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CHS is priced at $7.59, while FINL trades at $13.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.34, whereas FINL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CHS's ROE is +0.39%, compared to FINL's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CHS is more volatile compared to FINL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHS.Check FINL's competition here
CHS vs PSUN Comparison July 2026
CHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHS stands at 937M. In comparison, PSUN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CHS is priced at $7.59, while PSUN trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.34, whereas PSUN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CHS's ROE is +0.39%, compared to PSUN's ROE of -1.71%. Regarding short-term risk, CHS is less volatile compared to PSUN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHS.Check PSUN's competition here
CHS vs COX Comparison July 2026
CHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHS stands at 937M. In comparison, COX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CHS is priced at $7.59, while COX trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.34, whereas COX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CHS's ROE is +0.39%, compared to COX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CHS is less volatile compared to COX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHS.Check COX's competition here