Guess', Inc.

GES plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GES stands at 876.7M. In comparison, TJX has a market cap of 174.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GES is priced at $16.81, while TJX trades at $158.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GES currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas TJX's P/E ratio is 32.24. In terms of profitability, GES's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TJX's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, GES is less volatile compared to TJX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GES.Check TJX's competition here

GES plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GES stands at 876.7M. In comparison, ROST has a market cap of 73.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GES is priced at $16.81, while ROST trades at $226.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GES currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas ROST's P/E ratio is 34.25. In terms of profitability, GES's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ROST's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, GES is less volatile compared to ROST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GES.Check ROST's competition here

GES plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GES stands at 876.7M. In comparison, BURL has a market cap of 20.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GES is priced at $16.81, while BURL trades at $326.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GES currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas BURL's P/E ratio is 34.94. In terms of profitability, GES's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BURL's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, GES is less volatile compared to BURL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GES.Check BURL's competition here

GES plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GES stands at 876.7M. In comparison, LULU has a market cap of 16.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GES is priced at $16.81, while LULU trades at $146.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GES currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas LULU's P/E ratio is 10.84. In terms of profitability, GES's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LULU's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, GES is less volatile compared to LULU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GES.Check LULU's competition here

GES plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GES stands at 876.7M. In comparison, ONON has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, GES is priced at $16.81, while ONON trades at $35.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GES currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas ONON's P/E ratio is 47.69. In terms of profitability, GES's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ONON's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GES is less volatile compared to ONON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GES.Check ONON's competition here

GES plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GES stands at 876.7M. In comparison, GAP has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GES is priced at $16.81, while GAP trades at $25.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GES currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas GAP's P/E ratio is 11.72. In terms of profitability, GES's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GAP's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, GES is less volatile compared to GAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GES.Check GAP's competition here

GES plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GES stands at 876.7M. In comparison, GPS has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GES is priced at $16.81, while GPS trades at $24.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GES currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas GPS's P/E ratio is 13.64. In terms of profitability, GES's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GPS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, GES is less volatile compared to GPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GES.Check GPS's competition here

GES plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GES stands at 876.7M. In comparison, URBN has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GES is priced at $16.81, while URBN trades at $72.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GES currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas URBN's P/E ratio is 14.55. In terms of profitability, GES's ROE is +0.16%, compared to URBN's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GES is less volatile compared to URBN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GES.Check URBN's competition here

GES plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GES stands at 876.7M. In comparison, BOOT has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GES is priced at $16.81, while BOOT trades at $169.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GES currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas BOOT's P/E ratio is 23.66. In terms of profitability, GES's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BOOT's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GES is less volatile compared to BOOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GES.Check BOOT's competition here

GES plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GES stands at 876.7M. In comparison, VSCO has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GES is priced at $16.81, while VSCO trades at $52.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GES currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas VSCO's P/E ratio is 27.37. In terms of profitability, GES's ROE is +0.16%, compared to VSCO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, GES is less volatile compared to VSCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GES.Check VSCO's competition here

GES plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GES stands at 876.7M. In comparison, ANF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GES is priced at $16.81, while ANF trades at $86.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GES currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas ANF's P/E ratio is 8.32. In terms of profitability, GES's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ANF's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, GES is less volatile compared to ANF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GES.Check ANF's competition here

GES plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GES stands at 876.7M. In comparison, AEO has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, GES is priced at $16.81, while AEO trades at $17.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GES currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas AEO's P/E ratio is 16.42. In terms of profitability, GES's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AEO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GES is less volatile compared to AEO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GES.Check AEO's competition here

GES plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GES stands at 876.7M. In comparison, BKE has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GES is priced at $16.81, while BKE trades at $56.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GES currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas BKE's P/E ratio is 13.57. In terms of profitability, GES's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BKE's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, GES is less volatile compared to BKE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GES.Check BKE's competition here

GES plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GES stands at 876.7M. In comparison, FL has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GES is priced at $16.81, while FL trades at $24.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GES currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas FL's P/E ratio is -6.05. In terms of profitability, GES's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FL's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GES is more volatile compared to FL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GES.Check FL's competition here

GES plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GES stands at 876.7M. In comparison, CRI has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GES is priced at $16.81, while CRI trades at $38.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GES currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas CRI's P/E ratio is 14.72. In terms of profitability, GES's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CRI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GES is less volatile compared to CRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GES.Check CRI's competition here

GES plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GES stands at 876.7M. In comparison, HIBB has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, GES is priced at $16.81, while HIBB trades at $87.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GES currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas HIBB's P/E ratio is 10.80. In terms of profitability, GES's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HIBB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GES is more volatile compared to HIBB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GES.Check HIBB's competition here

GES plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GES stands at 876.7M. In comparison, CHS has a market cap of 937M. Regarding current trading prices, GES is priced at $16.81, while CHS trades at $7.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GES currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas CHS's P/E ratio is 8.34. In terms of profitability, GES's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CHS's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, GES is more volatile compared to CHS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GES.Check CHS's competition here

GES plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GES stands at 876.7M. In comparison, SFIX has a market cap of 525.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GES is priced at $16.81, while SFIX trades at $3.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GES currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas SFIX's P/E ratio is -20.26. In terms of profitability, GES's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SFIX's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GES is less volatile compared to SFIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GES.Check SFIX's competition here

GES plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GES stands at 876.7M. In comparison, SCVL has a market cap of 513.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GES is priced at $16.81, while SCVL trades at $18.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GES currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas SCVL's P/E ratio is 9.84. In terms of profitability, GES's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SCVL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GES is less volatile compared to SCVL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GES.Check SCVL's competition here

GES plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GES stands at 876.7M. In comparison, CTRN has a market cap of 422.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GES is priced at $16.81, while CTRN trades at $49.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GES currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas CTRN's P/E ratio is 80.41. In terms of profitability, GES's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CTRN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GES is less volatile compared to CTRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GES.Check CTRN's competition here

GES plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GES stands at 876.7M. In comparison, ZUMZ has a market cap of 416.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GES is priced at $16.81, while ZUMZ trades at $24.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GES currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas ZUMZ's P/E ratio is 31.49. In terms of profitability, GES's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ZUMZ's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GES is less volatile compared to ZUMZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GES.Check ZUMZ's competition here

GES plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GES stands at 876.7M. In comparison, DBI has a market cap of 410.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GES is priced at $16.81, while DBI trades at $7.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GES currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas DBI's P/E ratio is -47.65. In terms of profitability, GES's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DBI's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GES is less volatile compared to DBI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GES.Check DBI's competition here

GES plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GES stands at 876.7M. In comparison, GCO has a market cap of 381.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GES is priced at $16.81, while GCO trades at $35.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GES currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas GCO's P/E ratio is 28.14. In terms of profitability, GES's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GCO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GES is less volatile compared to GCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GES.Check GCO's competition here

GES plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GES stands at 876.7M. In comparison, CURV has a market cap of 181.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GES is priced at $16.81, while CURV trades at $1.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GES currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas CURV's P/E ratio is -26.07. In terms of profitability, GES's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CURV's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GES is less volatile compared to CURV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GES.Check CURV's competition here

GES plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GES stands at 876.7M. In comparison, JILL has a market cap of 149.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GES is priced at $16.81, while JILL trades at $12.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GES currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas JILL's P/E ratio is 7.25. In terms of profitability, GES's ROE is +0.16%, compared to JILL's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, GES is less volatile compared to JILL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GES.Check JILL's competition here

GES plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GES stands at 876.7M. In comparison, DLTH has a market cap of 132.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GES is priced at $16.81, while DLTH trades at $3.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GES currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas DLTH's P/E ratio is -7.66. In terms of profitability, GES's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DLTH's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GES is less volatile compared to DLTH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GES.Check DLTH's competition here

GES plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GES stands at 876.7M. In comparison, TLYS has a market cap of 121M. Regarding current trading prices, GES is priced at $16.81, while TLYS trades at $3.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GES currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas TLYS's P/E ratio is -6.93. In terms of profitability, GES's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TLYS's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GES is less volatile compared to TLYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GES.Check TLYS's competition here

GES plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GES stands at 876.7M. In comparison, PLCE has a market cap of 74.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GES is priced at $16.81, while PLCE trades at $3.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GES currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas PLCE's P/E ratio is -0.84. In terms of profitability, GES's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PLCE's ROE of +5.33%. Regarding short-term risk, GES is less volatile compared to PLCE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GES.Check PLCE's competition here

GES plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GES stands at 876.7M. In comparison, CATO has a market cap of 52M. Regarding current trading prices, GES is priced at $16.81, while CATO trades at $2.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GES currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas CATO's P/E ratio is -9.32. In terms of profitability, GES's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CATO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GES is less volatile compared to CATO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GES.Check CATO's competition here

GES plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GES stands at 876.7M. In comparison, DXLG has a market cap of 38M. Regarding current trading prices, GES is priced at $16.81, while DXLG trades at $0.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GES currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas DXLG's P/E ratio is -1.05. In terms of profitability, GES's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DXLG's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, GES is less volatile compared to DXLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GES.Check DXLG's competition here

GES plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GES stands at 876.7M. In comparison, DBGIW has a market cap of 30.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GES is priced at $16.81, while DBGIW trades at $16.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GES currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas DBGIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GES's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DBGIW's ROE of -2.97%. Regarding short-term risk, GES is less volatile compared to DBGIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GES.Check DBGIW's competition here

GES plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GES stands at 876.7M. In comparison, LVLU has a market cap of 27.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GES is priced at $16.81, while LVLU trades at $10.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GES currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas LVLU's P/E ratio is -1.94. In terms of profitability, GES's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LVLU's ROE of -3.27%. Regarding short-term risk, GES is less volatile compared to LVLU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GES.Check LVLU's competition here

GES plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GES stands at 876.7M. In comparison, RENT has a market cap of 21.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GES is priced at $16.81, while RENT trades at $4.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GES currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas RENT's P/E ratio is 2.63. In terms of profitability, GES's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RENT's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GES is less volatile compared to RENT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GES.Check RENT's competition here

GES plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GES stands at 876.7M. In comparison, DBGI has a market cap of 11.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GES is priced at $16.81, while DBGI trades at $1.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GES currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas DBGI's P/E ratio is -0.66. In terms of profitability, GES's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DBGI's ROE of -2.97%. Regarding short-term risk, GES is less volatile compared to DBGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GES.Check DBGI's competition here

GES plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GES stands at 876.7M. In comparison, EXPR has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GES is priced at $16.81, while EXPR trades at $0.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GES currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas EXPR's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, GES's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EXPR's ROE of +1.90%. Regarding short-term risk, GES is less volatile compared to EXPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GES.Check EXPR's competition here

GES plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GES stands at 876.7M. In comparison, JEM has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GES is priced at $16.81, while JEM trades at $1.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GES currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas JEM's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, GES's ROE is +0.16%, compared to JEM's ROE of +1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GES is less volatile compared to JEM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GES.Check JEM's competition here

GES plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GES stands at 876.7M. In comparison, CLE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GES is priced at $16.81, while CLE trades at $0.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GES currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas CLE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GES's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CLE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GES is more volatile compared to CLE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GES.Check CLE's competition here

GES plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GES stands at 876.7M. In comparison, TSA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GES is priced at $16.81, while TSA trades at $20.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GES currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas TSA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GES's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TSA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GES is less volatile compared to TSA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GES.Check TSA's competition here

GES plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GES stands at 876.7M. In comparison, FINL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GES is priced at $16.81, while FINL trades at $13.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GES currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas FINL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GES's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FINL's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GES is more volatile compared to FINL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GES.Check FINL's competition here

GES plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GES stands at 876.7M. In comparison, COX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GES is priced at $16.81, while COX trades at $0.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GES currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas COX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GES's ROE is +0.16%, compared to COX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GES is less volatile compared to COX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GES.Check COX's competition here

GES plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GES stands at 876.7M. In comparison, LDG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GES is priced at $16.81, while LDG trades at $20,900.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GES currently has a P/E ratio of 14.49, whereas LDG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GES's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LDG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GES is less volatile compared to LDG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GES.Check LDG's competition here