The Cato Corporation
The Cato Corporation (CATO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CATO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Apparel - Retail Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CATO | $2.94 | +0.00% | 52.7M | -9.48 | -$0.31 | N/A |
| TJX | $150.25 | +1.91% | 166.3B | 30.86 | $4.87 | +1.17% |
| ROST | $211.08 | -0.78% | 68.3B | 31.88 | $6.62 | +0.79% |
| BURL | $290.38 | -1.10% | 18.2B | 30.53 | $9.51 | N/A |
| LULU | $120.26 | +0.94% | 14.1B | 9.07 | $13.26 | N/A |
| ONON | $38.10 | +2.25% | 12.7B | 39.69 | $0.96 | N/A |
| GPS | $24.55 | +4.38% | 9.2B | 13.64 | $1.80 | +2.44% |
| GAP | $20.73 | -1.50% | 7.6B | 9.73 | $2.13 | +3.24% |
| URBN | $69.61 | +0.96% | 6.2B | 13.76 | $5.06 | N/A |
| BOOT | $141.09 | -1.92% | 4.3B | 19.19 | $7.35 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
CATO vs TJX Comparison May 2026
CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 52.7M. In comparison, TJX has a market cap of 166.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $2.94, while TJX trades at $150.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -9.48, whereas TJX's P/E ratio is 30.86. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to TJX's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is more volatile compared to TJX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check TJX's competition here
CATO vs ROST Comparison May 2026
CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 52.7M. In comparison, ROST has a market cap of 68.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $2.94, while ROST trades at $211.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -9.48, whereas ROST's P/E ratio is 31.88. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ROST's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is more volatile compared to ROST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check ROST's competition here
CATO vs BURL Comparison May 2026
CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 52.7M. In comparison, BURL has a market cap of 18.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $2.94, while BURL trades at $290.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -9.48, whereas BURL's P/E ratio is 30.53. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to BURL's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is more volatile compared to BURL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check BURL's competition here
CATO vs LULU Comparison May 2026
CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 52.7M. In comparison, LULU has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $2.94, while LULU trades at $120.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -9.48, whereas LULU's P/E ratio is 9.07. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to LULU's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is more volatile compared to LULU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check LULU's competition here
CATO vs ONON Comparison May 2026
CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 52.7M. In comparison, ONON has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $2.94, while ONON trades at $38.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -9.48, whereas ONON's P/E ratio is 39.69. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ONON's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is more volatile compared to ONON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check ONON's competition here
CATO vs GPS Comparison May 2026
CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 52.7M. In comparison, GPS has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $2.94, while GPS trades at $24.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -9.48, whereas GPS's P/E ratio is 13.64. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to GPS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is more volatile compared to GPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check GPS's competition here
CATO vs GAP Comparison May 2026
CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 52.7M. In comparison, GAP has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $2.94, while GAP trades at $20.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -9.48, whereas GAP's P/E ratio is 9.73. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to GAP's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is more volatile compared to GAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check GAP's competition here
CATO vs URBN Comparison May 2026
CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 52.7M. In comparison, URBN has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $2.94, while URBN trades at $69.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -9.48, whereas URBN's P/E ratio is 13.76. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to URBN's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is more volatile compared to URBN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check URBN's competition here
CATO vs BOOT Comparison May 2026
CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 52.7M. In comparison, BOOT has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $2.94, while BOOT trades at $141.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -9.48, whereas BOOT's P/E ratio is 19.19. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to BOOT's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is more volatile compared to BOOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check BOOT's competition here
CATO vs VSCO Comparison May 2026
CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 52.7M. In comparison, VSCO has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $2.94, while VSCO trades at $44.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -9.48, whereas VSCO's P/E ratio is 23.23. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to VSCO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is more volatile compared to VSCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check VSCO's competition here
CATO vs ANF Comparison May 2026
CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 52.7M. In comparison, ANF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $2.94, while ANF trades at $71.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -9.48, whereas ANF's P/E ratio is 6.88. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ANF's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is more volatile compared to ANF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check ANF's competition here
CATO vs BKE Comparison May 2026
CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 52.7M. In comparison, BKE has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $2.94, while BKE trades at $48.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -9.48, whereas BKE's P/E ratio is 11.71. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to BKE's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is more volatile compared to BKE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check BKE's competition here
CATO vs AEO Comparison May 2026
CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 52.7M. In comparison, AEO has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $2.94, while AEO trades at $14.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -9.48, whereas AEO's P/E ratio is 13.64. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to AEO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is more volatile compared to AEO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check AEO's competition here
CATO vs FL Comparison May 2026
CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 52.7M. In comparison, FL has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $2.94, while FL trades at $24.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -9.48, whereas FL's P/E ratio is -6.05. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to FL's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is more volatile compared to FL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check FL's competition here
CATO vs CRI Comparison May 2026
CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 52.7M. In comparison, CRI has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $2.94, while CRI trades at $35.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -9.48, whereas CRI's P/E ratio is 14.26. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CRI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is more volatile compared to CRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check CRI's competition here
CATO vs HIBB Comparison May 2026
CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 52.7M. In comparison, HIBB has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $2.94, while HIBB trades at $87.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -9.48, whereas HIBB's P/E ratio is 10.80. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to HIBB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is more volatile compared to HIBB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check HIBB's competition here
CATO vs CHS Comparison May 2026
CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 52.7M. In comparison, CHS has a market cap of 937M. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $2.94, while CHS trades at $7.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -9.48, whereas CHS's P/E ratio is 8.34. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CHS's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is more volatile compared to CHS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check CHS's competition here
CATO vs GES Comparison May 2026
CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 52.7M. In comparison, GES has a market cap of 876.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $2.94, while GES trades at $16.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -9.48, whereas GES's P/E ratio is 14.49. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to GES's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is more volatile compared to GES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check GES's competition here
CATO vs SCVL Comparison May 2026
CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 52.7M. In comparison, SCVL has a market cap of 421.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $2.94, while SCVL trades at $15.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -9.48, whereas SCVL's P/E ratio is 8.08. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SCVL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is more volatile compared to SCVL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check SCVL's competition here
CATO vs SFIX Comparison May 2026
CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 52.7M. In comparison, SFIX has a market cap of 419.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $2.94, while SFIX trades at $3.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -9.48, whereas SFIX's P/E ratio is -16.16. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SFIX's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is more volatile compared to SFIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check SFIX's competition here
CATO vs ZUMZ Comparison May 2026
CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 52.7M. In comparison, ZUMZ has a market cap of 397.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $2.94, while ZUMZ trades at $23.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -9.48, whereas ZUMZ's P/E ratio is 29.55. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ZUMZ's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is more volatile compared to ZUMZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check ZUMZ's competition here
CATO vs GCO Comparison May 2026
CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 52.7M. In comparison, GCO has a market cap of 347.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $2.94, while GCO trades at $32.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -9.48, whereas GCO's P/E ratio is 25.61. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to GCO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is more volatile compared to GCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check GCO's competition here
CATO vs CTRN Comparison May 2026
CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 52.7M. In comparison, CTRN has a market cap of 338.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $2.94, while CTRN trades at $40.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -9.48, whereas CTRN's P/E ratio is 64.33. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CTRN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is more volatile compared to CTRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check CTRN's competition here
CATO vs DBI Comparison May 2026
CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 52.7M. In comparison, DBI has a market cap of 308.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $2.94, while DBI trades at $6.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -9.48, whereas DBI's P/E ratio is -35.76. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to DBI's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is more volatile compared to DBI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check DBI's competition here
CATO vs JILL Comparison May 2026
CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 52.7M. In comparison, JILL has a market cap of 133.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $2.94, while JILL trades at $11.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -9.48, whereas JILL's P/E ratio is 6.51. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to JILL's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is more volatile compared to JILL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check JILL's competition here
CATO vs CURV Comparison May 2026
CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 52.7M. In comparison, CURV has a market cap of 133.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $2.94, while CURV trades at $1.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -9.48, whereas CURV's P/E ratio is -19.14. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CURV's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is more volatile compared to CURV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check CURV's competition here
CATO vs TLYS Comparison May 2026
CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 52.7M. In comparison, TLYS has a market cap of 132.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $2.94, while TLYS trades at $4.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -9.48, whereas TLYS's P/E ratio is -7.57. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to TLYS's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is more volatile compared to TLYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check TLYS's competition here
CATO vs DLTH Comparison May 2026
CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 52.7M. In comparison, DLTH has a market cap of 118.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $2.94, while DLTH trades at $3.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -9.48, whereas DLTH's P/E ratio is -6.62. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to DLTH's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is more volatile compared to DLTH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check DLTH's competition here
CATO vs PLCE Comparison May 2026
CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 52.7M. In comparison, PLCE has a market cap of 74.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $2.94, while PLCE trades at $3.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -9.48, whereas PLCE's P/E ratio is -0.84. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to PLCE's ROE of +5.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is more volatile compared to PLCE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check PLCE's competition here
CATO vs DXLG Comparison May 2026
CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 52.7M. In comparison, DXLG has a market cap of 37.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $2.94, while DXLG trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -9.48, whereas DXLG's P/E ratio is -1.04. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to DXLG's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is more volatile compared to DXLG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check DXLG's competition here
CATO vs DBGIW Comparison May 2026
CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 52.7M. In comparison, DBGIW has a market cap of 30.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $2.94, while DBGIW trades at $16.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -9.48, whereas DBGIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to DBGIW's ROE of -2.97%. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is less volatile compared to DBGIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check DBGIW's competition here
CATO vs LVLU Comparison May 2026
CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 52.7M. In comparison, LVLU has a market cap of 27.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $2.94, while LVLU trades at $9.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -9.48, whereas LVLU's P/E ratio is -2.76. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to LVLU's ROE of -3.91%. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is more volatile compared to LVLU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check LVLU's competition here
CATO vs RENT Comparison May 2026
CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 52.7M. In comparison, RENT has a market cap of 15.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $2.94, while RENT trades at $3.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -9.48, whereas RENT's P/E ratio is 1.88. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to RENT's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is less volatile compared to RENT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check RENT's competition here
CATO vs DBGI Comparison May 2026
CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 52.7M. In comparison, DBGI has a market cap of 8.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $2.94, while DBGI trades at $1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -9.48, whereas DBGI's P/E ratio is -0.47. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to DBGI's ROE of -2.97%. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is less volatile compared to DBGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check DBGI's competition here
CATO vs EXPR Comparison May 2026
CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 52.7M. In comparison, EXPR has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $2.94, while EXPR trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -9.48, whereas EXPR's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to EXPR's ROE of +1.90%. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is less volatile compared to EXPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check EXPR's competition here
CATO vs JEM Comparison May 2026
CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 52.7M. In comparison, JEM has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $2.94, while JEM trades at $1.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -9.48, whereas JEM's P/E ratio is -0.32. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to JEM's ROE of +1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is more volatile compared to JEM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check JEM's competition here
CATO vs TSA Comparison May 2026
CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 52.7M. In comparison, TSA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $2.94, while TSA trades at $20.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -9.48, whereas TSA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to TSA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is more volatile compared to TSA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check TSA's competition here
CATO vs FINL Comparison May 2026
CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 52.7M. In comparison, FINL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $2.94, while FINL trades at $13.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -9.48, whereas FINL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to FINL's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is more volatile compared to FINL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check FINL's competition here
CATO vs CLE Comparison May 2026
CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 52.7M. In comparison, CLE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $2.94, while CLE trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -9.48, whereas CLE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CLE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is more volatile compared to CLE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check CLE's competition here
CATO vs COX Comparison May 2026
CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 52.7M. In comparison, COX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $2.94, while COX trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -9.48, whereas COX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to COX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is more volatile compared to COX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check COX's competition here
CATO vs LDG Comparison May 2026
CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 52.7M. In comparison, LDG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $2.94, while LDG trades at $20,900.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -9.48, whereas LDG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.04%, compared to LDG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is more volatile compared to LDG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check LDG's competition here