The Cato Corporation (CATO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CATO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Apparel - Retail Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CATO | $3.18 | -3.05% | 59.1M | -325.00 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| TJX | $160.71 | +1.31% | 177.5B | 31.32 | $5.13 | +1.09% |
| ROST | $230.37 | -1.15% | 73.9B | 32.13 | $7.17 | +0.72% |
| BURL | $317.05 | -1.53% | 19.9B | 32.55 | $9.73 | N/A |
| LULU | $114.23 | -8.56% | 13.7B | 8.62 | $13.25 | N/A |
| ONON | $37.08 | -1.04% | 12.9B | 38.64 | $0.96 | N/A |
| GPS | $24.55 | +4.38% | 9.2B | 13.64 | $1.80 | +2.44% |
| GAP | $21.56 | +0.00% | 7.8B | 8.55 | $2.52 | +3.15% |
| URBN | $71.30 | -2.21% | 6.4B | 13.71 | $5.20 | N/A |
| VSCO | $74.60 | +2.08% | 5.9B | 38.51 | $1.93 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
CATO vs TJX Comparison June 2026
CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 59.1M. In comparison, TJX has a market cap of 177.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $3.18, while TJX trades at $160.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -325.00, whereas TJX's P/E ratio is 31.32. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to TJX's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is more volatile compared to TJX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check TJX's competition here
CATO vs ROST Comparison June 2026
CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 59.1M. In comparison, ROST has a market cap of 73.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $3.18, while ROST trades at $230.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -325.00, whereas ROST's P/E ratio is 32.13. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ROST's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is more volatile compared to ROST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check ROST's competition here
CATO vs BURL Comparison June 2026
CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 59.1M. In comparison, BURL has a market cap of 19.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $3.18, while BURL trades at $317.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -325.00, whereas BURL's P/E ratio is 32.55. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to BURL's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is more volatile compared to BURL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check BURL's competition here
CATO vs LULU Comparison June 2026
CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 59.1M. In comparison, LULU has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $3.18, while LULU trades at $114.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -325.00, whereas LULU's P/E ratio is 8.62. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to LULU's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is more volatile compared to LULU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check LULU's competition here
CATO vs ONON Comparison June 2026
CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 59.1M. In comparison, ONON has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $3.18, while ONON trades at $37.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -325.00, whereas ONON's P/E ratio is 38.64. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ONON's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is more volatile compared to ONON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check ONON's competition here
CATO vs GPS Comparison June 2026
CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 59.1M. In comparison, GPS has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $3.18, while GPS trades at $24.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -325.00, whereas GPS's P/E ratio is 13.64. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to GPS's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is more volatile compared to GPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check GPS's competition here
CATO vs GAP Comparison June 2026
CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 59.1M. In comparison, GAP has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $3.18, while GAP trades at $21.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -325.00, whereas GAP's P/E ratio is 8.55. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to GAP's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is more volatile compared to GAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check GAP's competition here
CATO vs URBN Comparison June 2026
CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 59.1M. In comparison, URBN has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $3.18, while URBN trades at $71.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -325.00, whereas URBN's P/E ratio is 13.71. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to URBN's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is more volatile compared to URBN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check URBN's competition here
CATO vs VSCO Comparison June 2026
CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 59.1M. In comparison, VSCO has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $3.18, while VSCO trades at $74.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -325.00, whereas VSCO's P/E ratio is 38.51. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to VSCO's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is more volatile compared to VSCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check VSCO's competition here
CATO vs BOOT Comparison June 2026
CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 59.1M. In comparison, BOOT has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $3.18, while BOOT trades at $167.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -325.00, whereas BOOT's P/E ratio is 22.78. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to BOOT's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is more volatile compared to BOOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check BOOT's competition here
CATO vs ANF Comparison June 2026
CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 59.1M. In comparison, ANF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $3.18, while ANF trades at $75.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -325.00, whereas ANF's P/E ratio is 7.28. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ANF's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is more volatile compared to ANF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check ANF's competition here
CATO vs AEO Comparison June 2026
CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 59.1M. In comparison, AEO has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $3.18, while AEO trades at $16.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -325.00, whereas AEO's P/E ratio is 10.34. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to AEO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is more volatile compared to AEO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check AEO's competition here
CATO vs BKE Comparison June 2026
CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 59.1M. In comparison, BKE has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $3.18, while BKE trades at $44.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -325.00, whereas BKE's P/E ratio is 10.28. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to BKE's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is more volatile compared to BKE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check BKE's competition here
CATO vs FL Comparison June 2026
CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 59.1M. In comparison, FL has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $3.18, while FL trades at $24.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -325.00, whereas FL's P/E ratio is -6.05. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to FL's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is more volatile compared to FL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check FL's competition here
CATO vs CRI Comparison June 2026
CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 59.1M. In comparison, CRI has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $3.18, while CRI trades at $38.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -325.00, whereas CRI's P/E ratio is 15.33. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CRI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is more volatile compared to CRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check CRI's competition here
CATO vs HIBB Comparison June 2026
CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 59.1M. In comparison, HIBB has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $3.18, while HIBB trades at $87.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -325.00, whereas HIBB's P/E ratio is 10.80. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to HIBB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is more volatile compared to HIBB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check HIBB's competition here
CATO vs CHS Comparison June 2026
CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 59.1M. In comparison, CHS has a market cap of 937M. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $3.18, while CHS trades at $7.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -325.00, whereas CHS's P/E ratio is 8.34. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CHS's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is more volatile compared to CHS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check CHS's competition here
CATO vs GES Comparison June 2026
CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 59.1M. In comparison, GES has a market cap of 876.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $3.18, while GES trades at $16.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -325.00, whereas GES's P/E ratio is 14.49. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to GES's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is more volatile compared to GES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check GES's competition here
CATO vs SFIX Comparison June 2026
CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 59.1M. In comparison, SFIX has a market cap of 466.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $3.18, while SFIX trades at $3.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -325.00, whereas SFIX's P/E ratio is -18.00. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SFIX's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is more volatile compared to SFIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check SFIX's competition here
CATO vs SCVL Comparison June 2026
CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 59.1M. In comparison, SCVL has a market cap of 448.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $3.18, while SCVL trades at $16.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -325.00, whereas SCVL's P/E ratio is 12.10. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SCVL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is more volatile compared to SCVL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check SCVL's competition here
CATO vs DBI Comparison June 2026
CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 59.1M. In comparison, DBI has a market cap of 427.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $3.18, while DBI trades at $8.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -325.00, whereas DBI's P/E ratio is -49.59. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to DBI's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is less volatile compared to DBI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check DBI's competition here
CATO vs GCO Comparison June 2026
CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 59.1M. In comparison, GCO has a market cap of 421.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $3.18, while GCO trades at $37.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -325.00, whereas GCO's P/E ratio is 20.51. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to GCO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is more volatile compared to GCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check GCO's competition here
CATO vs CTRN Comparison June 2026
CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 59.1M. In comparison, CTRN has a market cap of 360M. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $3.18, while CTRN trades at $43.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -325.00, whereas CTRN's P/E ratio is 30.11. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CTRN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is more volatile compared to CTRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check CTRN's competition here
CATO vs ZUMZ Comparison June 2026
CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 59.1M. In comparison, ZUMZ has a market cap of 300.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $3.18, while ZUMZ trades at $17.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -325.00, whereas ZUMZ's P/E ratio is 22.29. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ZUMZ's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is less volatile compared to ZUMZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check ZUMZ's competition here
CATO vs CURV Comparison June 2026
CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 59.1M. In comparison, CURV has a market cap of 162.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $3.18, while CURV trades at $1.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -325.00, whereas CURV's P/E ratio is -12.58. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CURV's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is less volatile compared to CURV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check CURV's competition here
CATO vs TLYS Comparison June 2026
CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 59.1M. In comparison, TLYS has a market cap of 153.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $3.18, while TLYS trades at $5.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -325.00, whereas TLYS's P/E ratio is -51.10. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to TLYS's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is less volatile compared to TLYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check TLYS's competition here
CATO vs JILL Comparison June 2026
CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 59.1M. In comparison, JILL has a market cap of 148M. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $3.18, while JILL trades at $13.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -325.00, whereas JILL's P/E ratio is 7.20. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to JILL's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is more volatile compared to JILL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check JILL's competition here
CATO vs DLTH Comparison June 2026
CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 59.1M. In comparison, DLTH has a market cap of 126.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $3.18, while DLTH trades at $3.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -325.00, whereas DLTH's P/E ratio is -7.06. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to DLTH's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is more volatile compared to DLTH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check DLTH's competition here
CATO vs PLCE Comparison June 2026
CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 59.1M. In comparison, PLCE has a market cap of 78.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $3.18, while PLCE trades at $3.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -325.00, whereas PLCE's P/E ratio is -0.88. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to PLCE's ROE of +5.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is more volatile compared to PLCE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check PLCE's competition here
CATO vs DXLG Comparison June 2026
CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 59.1M. In comparison, DXLG has a market cap of 40.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $3.18, while DXLG trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -325.00, whereas DXLG's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to DXLG's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is more volatile compared to DXLG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check DXLG's competition here
CATO vs DBGIW Comparison June 2026
CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 59.1M. In comparison, DBGIW has a market cap of 30.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $3.18, while DBGIW trades at $16.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -325.00, whereas DBGIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to DBGIW's ROE of -4.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is less volatile compared to DBGIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check DBGIW's competition here
CATO vs LVLU Comparison June 2026
CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 59.1M. In comparison, LVLU has a market cap of 24.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $3.18, while LVLU trades at $8.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -325.00, whereas LVLU's P/E ratio is -2.47. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to LVLU's ROE of -4.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is less volatile compared to LVLU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check LVLU's competition here
CATO vs RENT Comparison June 2026
CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 59.1M. In comparison, RENT has a market cap of 14.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $3.18, while RENT trades at $3.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -325.00, whereas RENT's P/E ratio is 0.44. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to RENT's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is more volatile compared to RENT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check RENT's competition here
CATO vs DBGI Comparison June 2026
CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 59.1M. In comparison, DBGI has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $3.18, while DBGI trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -325.00, whereas DBGI's P/E ratio is -0.36. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to DBGI's ROE of -4.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is less volatile compared to DBGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check DBGI's competition here
CATO vs EXPR Comparison June 2026
CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 59.1M. In comparison, EXPR has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $3.18, while EXPR trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -325.00, whereas EXPR's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to EXPR's ROE of +1.90%. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is less volatile compared to EXPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check EXPR's competition here
CATO vs JEM Comparison June 2026
CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 59.1M. In comparison, JEM has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $3.18, while JEM trades at $1.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -325.00, whereas JEM's P/E ratio is -0.36. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to JEM's ROE of +1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is more volatile compared to JEM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check JEM's competition here
CATO vs CLE Comparison June 2026
CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 59.1M. In comparison, CLE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $3.18, while CLE trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -325.00, whereas CLE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CLE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is more volatile compared to CLE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check CLE's competition here
CATO vs TSA Comparison June 2026
CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 59.1M. In comparison, TSA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $3.18, while TSA trades at $20.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -325.00, whereas TSA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to TSA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is more volatile compared to TSA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check TSA's competition here
CATO vs COX Comparison June 2026
CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 59.1M. In comparison, COX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $3.18, while COX trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -325.00, whereas COX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to COX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is more volatile compared to COX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check COX's competition here
CATO vs FINL Comparison June 2026
CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 59.1M. In comparison, FINL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $3.18, while FINL trades at $13.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -325.00, whereas FINL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to FINL's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is more volatile compared to FINL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check FINL's competition here
CATO vs LDG Comparison June 2026
CATO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CATO stands at 59.1M. In comparison, LDG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CATO is priced at $3.18, while LDG trades at $20,900.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CATO currently has a P/E ratio of -325.00, whereas LDG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CATO's ROE is -0.00%, compared to LDG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CATO is more volatile compared to LDG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CATO.Check LDG's competition here