Abercrombie & Fitch Co. (ANF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (ANF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Apparel - Retail Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ANF | $90.01 | +0.69% | 4B | 9.15 | $9.83 | N/A |
| TJX | $151.50 | +0.18% | 167.4B | 30.30 | $5.00 | +1.16% |
| ROST | $212.85 | +1.93% | 68.2B | 29.71 | $7.16 | +0.80% |
| BURL | $316.80 | +0.80% | 19.9B | 30.79 | $10.29 | N/A |
| LULU | $114.18 | -0.10% | 13B | 9.22 | $12.39 | N/A |
| GPS | $24.55 | +4.38% | 9.2B | 13.64 | $1.80 | +2.44% |
| GAP | $18.68 | -0.27% | 6.7B | 9.24 | $2.02 | +3.62% |
| VSCO | $83.48 | -3.44% | 6.6B | 43.25 | $1.93 | N/A |
| URBN | $70.86 | -0.84% | 6.1B | 12.68 | $5.59 | N/A |
| BOOT | $164.27 | -0.17% | 5B | 22.35 | $7.35 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
ANF vs TJX Comparison July 2026
ANF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANF stands at 4B. In comparison, TJX has a market cap of 167.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ANF is priced at $90.01, while TJX trades at $151.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.15, whereas TJX's P/E ratio is 30.30. In terms of profitability, ANF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to TJX's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, ANF is more volatile compared to TJX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANF.Check TJX's competition here
ANF vs ROST Comparison July 2026
ANF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANF stands at 4B. In comparison, ROST has a market cap of 68.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ANF is priced at $90.01, while ROST trades at $212.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.15, whereas ROST's P/E ratio is 29.71. In terms of profitability, ANF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to ROST's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, ANF is more volatile compared to ROST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANF.Check ROST's competition here
ANF vs BURL Comparison July 2026
ANF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANF stands at 4B. In comparison, BURL has a market cap of 19.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ANF is priced at $90.01, while BURL trades at $316.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.15, whereas BURL's P/E ratio is 30.79. In terms of profitability, ANF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to BURL's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, ANF is more volatile compared to BURL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANF.Check BURL's competition here
ANF vs LULU Comparison July 2026
ANF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANF stands at 4B. In comparison, LULU has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, ANF is priced at $90.01, while LULU trades at $114.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.15, whereas LULU's P/E ratio is 9.22. In terms of profitability, ANF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to LULU's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, ANF is more volatile compared to LULU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANF.Check LULU's competition here
ANF vs GPS Comparison July 2026
ANF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANF stands at 4B. In comparison, GPS has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ANF is priced at $90.01, while GPS trades at $24.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.15, whereas GPS's P/E ratio is 13.64. In terms of profitability, ANF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to GPS's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ANF is more volatile compared to GPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANF.Check GPS's competition here
ANF vs GAP Comparison July 2026
ANF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANF stands at 4B. In comparison, GAP has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ANF is priced at $90.01, while GAP trades at $18.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.15, whereas GAP's P/E ratio is 9.24. In terms of profitability, ANF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to GAP's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ANF is more volatile compared to GAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANF.Check GAP's competition here
ANF vs VSCO Comparison July 2026
ANF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANF stands at 4B. In comparison, VSCO has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ANF is priced at $90.01, while VSCO trades at $83.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.15, whereas VSCO's P/E ratio is 43.25. In terms of profitability, ANF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to VSCO's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ANF is more volatile compared to VSCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANF.Check VSCO's competition here
ANF vs URBN Comparison July 2026
ANF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANF stands at 4B. In comparison, URBN has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ANF is priced at $90.01, while URBN trades at $70.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.15, whereas URBN's P/E ratio is 12.68. In terms of profitability, ANF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to URBN's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ANF is more volatile compared to URBN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANF.Check URBN's competition here
ANF vs BOOT Comparison July 2026
ANF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANF stands at 4B. In comparison, BOOT has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, ANF is priced at $90.01, while BOOT trades at $164.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.15, whereas BOOT's P/E ratio is 22.35. In terms of profitability, ANF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to BOOT's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ANF is more volatile compared to BOOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANF.Check BOOT's competition here
ANF vs AEO Comparison July 2026
ANF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANF stands at 4B. In comparison, AEO has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ANF is priced at $90.01, while AEO trades at $17.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.15, whereas AEO's P/E ratio is 10.62. In terms of profitability, ANF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to AEO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ANF is more volatile compared to AEO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANF.Check AEO's competition here
ANF vs FL Comparison July 2026
ANF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANF stands at 4B. In comparison, FL has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ANF is priced at $90.01, while FL trades at $24.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.15, whereas FL's P/E ratio is -6.05. In terms of profitability, ANF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to FL's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ANF is more volatile compared to FL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANF.Check FL's competition here
ANF vs BKE Comparison July 2026
ANF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANF stands at 4B. In comparison, BKE has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ANF is priced at $90.01, while BKE trades at $42.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.15, whereas BKE's P/E ratio is 9.68. In terms of profitability, ANF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to BKE's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, ANF is more volatile compared to BKE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANF.Check BKE's competition here
ANF vs HIBB Comparison July 2026
ANF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANF stands at 4B. In comparison, HIBB has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, ANF is priced at $90.01, while HIBB trades at $87.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.15, whereas HIBB's P/E ratio is 10.80. In terms of profitability, ANF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to HIBB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ANF is more volatile compared to HIBB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANF.Check HIBB's competition here
ANF vs CHS Comparison July 2026
ANF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANF stands at 4B. In comparison, CHS has a market cap of 937M. Regarding current trading prices, ANF is priced at $90.01, while CHS trades at $7.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.15, whereas CHS's P/E ratio is 8.34. In terms of profitability, ANF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to CHS's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, ANF is more volatile compared to CHS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANF.Check CHS's competition here
ANF vs GES Comparison July 2026
ANF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANF stands at 4B. In comparison, GES has a market cap of 876.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ANF is priced at $90.01, while GES trades at $16.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.15, whereas GES's P/E ratio is 14.49. In terms of profitability, ANF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to GES's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ANF is more volatile compared to GES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANF.Check GES's competition here
ANF vs SFIX Comparison July 2026
ANF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANF stands at 4B. In comparison, SFIX has a market cap of 548.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ANF is priced at $90.01, while SFIX trades at $4.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.15, whereas SFIX's P/E ratio is -27.40. In terms of profitability, ANF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to SFIX's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ANF is less volatile compared to SFIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANF.Check SFIX's competition here
ANF vs CTRN Comparison July 2026
ANF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANF stands at 4B. In comparison, CTRN has a market cap of 481.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ANF is priced at $90.01, while CTRN trades at $57.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.15, whereas CTRN's P/E ratio is 251.48. In terms of profitability, ANF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to CTRN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ANF is less volatile compared to CTRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANF.Check CTRN's competition here
ANF vs SCVL Comparison July 2026
ANF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANF stands at 4B. In comparison, SCVL has a market cap of 402.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ANF is priced at $90.01, while SCVL trades at $14.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.15, whereas SCVL's P/E ratio is 10.99. In terms of profitability, ANF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to SCVL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ANF is more volatile compared to SCVL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANF.Check SCVL's competition here
ANF vs SHOE Comparison July 2026
ANF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANF stands at 4B. In comparison, SHOE has a market cap of 402.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ANF is priced at $90.01, while SHOE trades at $14.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.15, whereas SHOE's P/E ratio is 26.48. In terms of profitability, ANF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to SHOE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ANF is more volatile compared to SHOE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANF.Check SHOE's competition here
ANF vs GCO Comparison July 2026
ANF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANF stands at 4B. In comparison, GCO has a market cap of 376.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ANF is priced at $90.01, while GCO trades at $33.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.15, whereas GCO's P/E ratio is 28.00. In terms of profitability, ANF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to GCO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ANF is more volatile compared to GCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANF.Check GCO's competition here
ANF vs ZUMZ Comparison July 2026
ANF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANF stands at 4B. In comparison, ZUMZ has a market cap of 300.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ANF is priced at $90.01, while ZUMZ trades at $17.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.15, whereas ZUMZ's P/E ratio is 24.05. In terms of profitability, ANF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to ZUMZ's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ANF is more volatile compared to ZUMZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANF.Check ZUMZ's competition here
ANF vs DBI Comparison July 2026
ANF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANF stands at 4B. In comparison, DBI has a market cap of 297M. Regarding current trading prices, ANF is priced at $90.01, while DBI trades at $5.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.15, whereas DBI's P/E ratio is 12.19. In terms of profitability, ANF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to DBI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ANF is less volatile compared to DBI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANF.Check DBI's competition here
ANF vs CURV Comparison July 2026
ANF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANF stands at 4B. In comparison, CURV has a market cap of 184.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ANF is priced at $90.01, while CURV trades at $1.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.15, whereas CURV's P/E ratio is -15.97. In terms of profitability, ANF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to CURV's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ANF is less volatile compared to CURV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANF.Check CURV's competition here
ANF vs JILL Comparison July 2026
ANF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANF stands at 4B. In comparison, JILL has a market cap of 179.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ANF is priced at $90.01, while JILL trades at $15.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.15, whereas JILL's P/E ratio is 7.94. In terms of profitability, ANF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to JILL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ANF is more volatile compared to JILL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANF.Check JILL's competition here
ANF vs DLTH Comparison July 2026
ANF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANF stands at 4B. In comparison, DLTH has a market cap of 170.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ANF is priced at $90.01, while DLTH trades at $4.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.15, whereas DLTH's P/E ratio is -26.35. In terms of profitability, ANF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to DLTH's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ANF is more volatile compared to DLTH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANF.Check DLTH's competition here
ANF vs TLYS Comparison July 2026
ANF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANF stands at 4B. In comparison, TLYS has a market cap of 127.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ANF is priced at $90.01, while TLYS trades at $4.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.15, whereas TLYS's P/E ratio is -38.45. In terms of profitability, ANF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to TLYS's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ANF is less volatile compared to TLYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANF.Check TLYS's competition here
ANF vs AKA Comparison July 2026
ANF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANF stands at 4B. In comparison, AKA has a market cap of 121.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ANF is priced at $90.01, while AKA trades at $10.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.15, whereas AKA's P/E ratio is -4.98. In terms of profitability, ANF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to AKA's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, ANF is less volatile compared to AKA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANF.Check AKA's competition here
ANF vs PLCE Comparison July 2026
ANF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANF stands at 4B. In comparison, PLCE has a market cap of 67.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ANF is priced at $90.01, while PLCE trades at $3.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.15, whereas PLCE's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, ANF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to PLCE's ROE of +2.46%. Regarding short-term risk, ANF is more volatile compared to PLCE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANF.Check PLCE's competition here
ANF vs CATO Comparison July 2026
ANF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANF stands at 4B. In comparison, CATO has a market cap of 58.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ANF is priced at $90.01, while CATO trades at $3.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.15, whereas CATO's P/E ratio is -323.00. In terms of profitability, ANF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to CATO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ANF is more volatile compared to CATO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANF.Check CATO's competition here
ANF vs DXLG Comparison July 2026
ANF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANF stands at 4B. In comparison, DXLG has a market cap of 37M. Regarding current trading prices, ANF is priced at $90.01, while DXLG trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.15, whereas DXLG's P/E ratio is -2.74. In terms of profitability, ANF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to DXLG's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ANF is less volatile compared to DXLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANF.Check DXLG's competition here
ANF vs DBGIW Comparison July 2026
ANF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANF stands at 4B. In comparison, DBGIW has a market cap of 30.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ANF is priced at $90.01, while DBGIW trades at $16.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.15, whereas DBGIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ANF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to DBGIW's ROE of -4.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ANF is less volatile compared to DBGIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANF.Check DBGIW's competition here
ANF vs LVLU Comparison July 2026
ANF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANF stands at 4B. In comparison, LVLU has a market cap of 22.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ANF is priced at $90.01, while LVLU trades at $8.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.15, whereas LVLU's P/E ratio is -2.29. In terms of profitability, ANF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to LVLU's ROE of -4.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ANF is less volatile compared to LVLU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANF.Check LVLU's competition here
ANF vs RENT Comparison July 2026
ANF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANF stands at 4B. In comparison, RENT has a market cap of 13.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ANF is priced at $90.01, while RENT trades at $3.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.15, whereas RENT's P/E ratio is 0.47. In terms of profitability, ANF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to RENT's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ANF is less volatile compared to RENT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANF.Check RENT's competition here
ANF vs DBGI Comparison July 2026
ANF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANF stands at 4B. In comparison, DBGI has a market cap of 6.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ANF is priced at $90.01, while DBGI trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.15, whereas DBGI's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, ANF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to DBGI's ROE of -4.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ANF is more volatile compared to DBGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANF.Check DBGI's competition here
ANF vs JEM Comparison July 2026
ANF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANF stands at 4B. In comparison, JEM has a market cap of 4.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ANF is priced at $90.01, while JEM trades at $3.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.15, whereas JEM's P/E ratio is -0.84. In terms of profitability, ANF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to JEM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ANF is less volatile compared to JEM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANF.Check JEM's competition here
ANF vs EXPR Comparison July 2026
ANF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANF stands at 4B. In comparison, EXPR has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ANF is priced at $90.01, while EXPR trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.15, whereas EXPR's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, ANF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to EXPR's ROE of +1.90%. Regarding short-term risk, ANF is less volatile compared to EXPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANF.Check EXPR's competition here
ANF vs TSA Comparison July 2026
ANF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANF stands at 4B. In comparison, TSA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ANF is priced at $90.01, while TSA trades at $20.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.15, whereas TSA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ANF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to TSA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ANF is more volatile compared to TSA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANF.Check TSA's competition here
ANF vs LDG Comparison July 2026
ANF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANF stands at 4B. In comparison, LDG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ANF is priced at $90.01, while LDG trades at $20,900.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.15, whereas LDG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ANF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to LDG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ANF is more volatile compared to LDG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANF.Check LDG's competition here
ANF vs CLE Comparison July 2026
ANF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANF stands at 4B. In comparison, CLE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ANF is priced at $90.01, while CLE trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.15, whereas CLE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ANF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to CLE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ANF is more volatile compared to CLE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANF.Check CLE's competition here
ANF vs FINL Comparison July 2026
ANF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANF stands at 4B. In comparison, FINL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ANF is priced at $90.01, while FINL trades at $13.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.15, whereas FINL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ANF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to FINL's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ANF is more volatile compared to FINL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANF.Check FINL's competition here
ANF vs PSUN Comparison July 2026
ANF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANF stands at 4B. In comparison, PSUN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ANF is priced at $90.01, while PSUN trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.15, whereas PSUN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ANF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to PSUN's ROE of -1.71%. Regarding short-term risk, ANF is less volatile compared to PSUN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANF.Check PSUN's competition here
ANF vs COX Comparison July 2026
ANF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANF stands at 4B. In comparison, COX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ANF is priced at $90.01, while COX trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.15, whereas COX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ANF's ROE is +0.37%, compared to COX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ANF is less volatile compared to COX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANF.Check COX's competition here