Abercrombie & Fitch Co.
Abercrombie & Fitch Co. (ANF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (ANF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Apparel - Retail Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ANF | $86.59 | -0.59% | 3.9B | 8.28 | $10.46 | N/A |
| TJX | $157.48 | +0.29% | 174.9B | 32.35 | $4.87 | +1.07% |
| ROST | $226.17 | -0.09% | 73.2B | 34.22 | $6.61 | +0.73% |
| BURL | $326.32 | -1.64% | 20.5B | 34.28 | $9.52 | N/A |
| LULU | $146.94 | +2.18% | 17.2B | 11.08 | $13.26 | N/A |
| ONON | $35.93 | -0.87% | 11.9B | 46.06 | $0.78 | N/A |
| GPS | $24.55 | +4.38% | 9.2B | 13.64 | $1.80 | +2.44% |
| GAP | $25.13 | +0.56% | 9.2B | 11.79 | $2.13 | +2.67% |
| URBN | $72.34 | -1.77% | 6.5B | 14.30 | $5.06 | N/A |
| BOOT | $170.28 | +0.94% | 5.2B | 23.87 | $7.14 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
ANF vs TJX Comparison April 2026
ANF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANF stands at 3.9B. In comparison, TJX has a market cap of 174.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ANF is priced at $86.59, while TJX trades at $157.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas TJX's P/E ratio is 32.35. In terms of profitability, ANF's ROE is +0.39%, compared to TJX's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, ANF is more volatile compared to TJX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANF.Check TJX's competition here
ANF vs ROST Comparison April 2026
ANF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANF stands at 3.9B. In comparison, ROST has a market cap of 73.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ANF is priced at $86.59, while ROST trades at $226.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas ROST's P/E ratio is 34.22. In terms of profitability, ANF's ROE is +0.39%, compared to ROST's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, ANF is more volatile compared to ROST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANF.Check ROST's competition here
ANF vs BURL Comparison April 2026
ANF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANF stands at 3.9B. In comparison, BURL has a market cap of 20.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ANF is priced at $86.59, while BURL trades at $326.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas BURL's P/E ratio is 34.28. In terms of profitability, ANF's ROE is +0.39%, compared to BURL's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, ANF is less volatile compared to BURL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANF.Check BURL's competition here
ANF vs LULU Comparison April 2026
ANF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANF stands at 3.9B. In comparison, LULU has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ANF is priced at $86.59, while LULU trades at $146.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas LULU's P/E ratio is 11.08. In terms of profitability, ANF's ROE is +0.39%, compared to LULU's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, ANF is less volatile compared to LULU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANF.Check LULU's competition here
ANF vs ONON Comparison April 2026
ANF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANF stands at 3.9B. In comparison, ONON has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ANF is priced at $86.59, while ONON trades at $35.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas ONON's P/E ratio is 46.06. In terms of profitability, ANF's ROE is +0.39%, compared to ONON's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ANF is less volatile compared to ONON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANF.Check ONON's competition here
ANF vs GPS Comparison April 2026
ANF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANF stands at 3.9B. In comparison, GPS has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ANF is priced at $86.59, while GPS trades at $24.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas GPS's P/E ratio is 13.64. In terms of profitability, ANF's ROE is +0.39%, compared to GPS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ANF is less volatile compared to GPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANF.Check GPS's competition here
ANF vs GAP Comparison April 2026
ANF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANF stands at 3.9B. In comparison, GAP has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ANF is priced at $86.59, while GAP trades at $25.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas GAP's P/E ratio is 11.79. In terms of profitability, ANF's ROE is +0.39%, compared to GAP's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ANF is less volatile compared to GAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANF.Check GAP's competition here
ANF vs URBN Comparison April 2026
ANF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANF stands at 3.9B. In comparison, URBN has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ANF is priced at $86.59, while URBN trades at $72.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas URBN's P/E ratio is 14.30. In terms of profitability, ANF's ROE is +0.39%, compared to URBN's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ANF is less volatile compared to URBN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANF.Check URBN's competition here
ANF vs BOOT Comparison April 2026
ANF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANF stands at 3.9B. In comparison, BOOT has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ANF is priced at $86.59, while BOOT trades at $170.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas BOOT's P/E ratio is 23.87. In terms of profitability, ANF's ROE is +0.39%, compared to BOOT's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ANF is less volatile compared to BOOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANF.Check BOOT's competition here
ANF vs VSCO Comparison April 2026
ANF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANF stands at 3.9B. In comparison, VSCO has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ANF is priced at $86.59, while VSCO trades at $52.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas VSCO's P/E ratio is 27.23. In terms of profitability, ANF's ROE is +0.39%, compared to VSCO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ANF is less volatile compared to VSCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANF.Check VSCO's competition here
ANF vs AEO Comparison April 2026
ANF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANF stands at 3.9B. In comparison, AEO has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, ANF is priced at $86.59, while AEO trades at $17.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas AEO's P/E ratio is 16.41. In terms of profitability, ANF's ROE is +0.39%, compared to AEO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ANF is less volatile compared to AEO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANF.Check AEO's competition here
ANF vs BKE Comparison April 2026
ANF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANF stands at 3.9B. In comparison, BKE has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ANF is priced at $86.59, while BKE trades at $56.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas BKE's P/E ratio is 13.65. In terms of profitability, ANF's ROE is +0.39%, compared to BKE's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, ANF is more volatile compared to BKE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANF.Check BKE's competition here
ANF vs FL Comparison April 2026
ANF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANF stands at 3.9B. In comparison, FL has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ANF is priced at $86.59, while FL trades at $24.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas FL's P/E ratio is -6.05. In terms of profitability, ANF's ROE is +0.39%, compared to FL's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ANF is more volatile compared to FL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANF.Check FL's competition here
ANF vs CRI Comparison April 2026
ANF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANF stands at 3.9B. In comparison, CRI has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ANF is priced at $86.59, while CRI trades at $38.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas CRI's P/E ratio is 15.12. In terms of profitability, ANF's ROE is +0.39%, compared to CRI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ANF is less volatile compared to CRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANF.Check CRI's competition here
ANF vs HIBB Comparison April 2026
ANF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANF stands at 3.9B. In comparison, HIBB has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, ANF is priced at $86.59, while HIBB trades at $87.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas HIBB's P/E ratio is 10.80. In terms of profitability, ANF's ROE is +0.39%, compared to HIBB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ANF is more volatile compared to HIBB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANF.Check HIBB's competition here
ANF vs CHS Comparison April 2026
ANF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANF stands at 3.9B. In comparison, CHS has a market cap of 937M. Regarding current trading prices, ANF is priced at $86.59, while CHS trades at $7.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas CHS's P/E ratio is 8.34. In terms of profitability, ANF's ROE is +0.39%, compared to CHS's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, ANF is more volatile compared to CHS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANF.Check CHS's competition here
ANF vs GES Comparison April 2026
ANF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANF stands at 3.9B. In comparison, GES has a market cap of 876.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ANF is priced at $86.59, while GES trades at $16.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas GES's P/E ratio is 14.49. In terms of profitability, ANF's ROE is +0.39%, compared to GES's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ANF is more volatile compared to GES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANF.Check GES's competition here
ANF vs SCVL Comparison April 2026
ANF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANF stands at 3.9B. In comparison, SCVL has a market cap of 518.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ANF is priced at $86.59, while SCVL trades at $18.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas SCVL's P/E ratio is 9.94. In terms of profitability, ANF's ROE is +0.39%, compared to SCVL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ANF is more volatile compared to SCVL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANF.Check SCVL's competition here
ANF vs SFIX Comparison April 2026
ANF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANF stands at 3.9B. In comparison, SFIX has a market cap of 509.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ANF is priced at $86.59, while SFIX trades at $3.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas SFIX's P/E ratio is -19.66. In terms of profitability, ANF's ROE is +0.39%, compared to SFIX's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ANF is less volatile compared to SFIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANF.Check SFIX's competition here
ANF vs ZUMZ Comparison April 2026
ANF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANF stands at 3.9B. In comparison, ZUMZ has a market cap of 417.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ANF is priced at $86.59, while ZUMZ trades at $24.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas ZUMZ's P/E ratio is 31.51. In terms of profitability, ANF's ROE is +0.39%, compared to ZUMZ's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ANF is less volatile compared to ZUMZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANF.Check ZUMZ's competition here
ANF vs CTRN Comparison April 2026
ANF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANF stands at 3.9B. In comparison, CTRN has a market cap of 410.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ANF is priced at $86.59, while CTRN trades at $49.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas CTRN's P/E ratio is 78.10. In terms of profitability, ANF's ROE is +0.39%, compared to CTRN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ANF is less volatile compared to CTRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANF.Check CTRN's competition here
ANF vs DBI Comparison April 2026
ANF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANF stands at 3.9B. In comparison, DBI has a market cap of 385.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ANF is priced at $86.59, while DBI trades at $7.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas DBI's P/E ratio is -44.76. In terms of profitability, ANF's ROE is +0.39%, compared to DBI's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ANF is less volatile compared to DBI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANF.Check DBI's competition here
ANF vs GCO Comparison April 2026
ANF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANF stands at 3.9B. In comparison, GCO has a market cap of 384.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ANF is priced at $86.59, while GCO trades at $35.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas GCO's P/E ratio is 28.30. In terms of profitability, ANF's ROE is +0.39%, compared to GCO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ANF is less volatile compared to GCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANF.Check GCO's competition here
ANF vs CURV Comparison April 2026
ANF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANF stands at 3.9B. In comparison, CURV has a market cap of 176.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ANF is priced at $86.59, while CURV trades at $1.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas CURV's P/E ratio is -25.43. In terms of profitability, ANF's ROE is +0.39%, compared to CURV's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ANF is less volatile compared to CURV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANF.Check CURV's competition here
ANF vs JILL Comparison April 2026
ANF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANF stands at 3.9B. In comparison, JILL has a market cap of 145.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ANF is priced at $86.59, while JILL trades at $12.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas JILL's P/E ratio is 7.05. In terms of profitability, ANF's ROE is +0.39%, compared to JILL's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ANF is less volatile compared to JILL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANF.Check JILL's competition here
ANF vs DLTH Comparison April 2026
ANF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANF stands at 3.9B. In comparison, DLTH has a market cap of 139.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ANF is priced at $86.59, while DLTH trades at $3.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas DLTH's P/E ratio is -7.81. In terms of profitability, ANF's ROE is +0.39%, compared to DLTH's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ANF is less volatile compared to DLTH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANF.Check DLTH's competition here
ANF vs TLYS Comparison April 2026
ANF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANF stands at 3.9B. In comparison, TLYS has a market cap of 111.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ANF is priced at $86.59, while TLYS trades at $3.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas TLYS's P/E ratio is -6.37. In terms of profitability, ANF's ROE is +0.39%, compared to TLYS's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ANF is less volatile compared to TLYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANF.Check TLYS's competition here
ANF vs PLCE Comparison April 2026
ANF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANF stands at 3.9B. In comparison, PLCE has a market cap of 73.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ANF is priced at $86.59, while PLCE trades at $3.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas PLCE's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, ANF's ROE is +0.39%, compared to PLCE's ROE of +5.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ANF is less volatile compared to PLCE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANF.Check PLCE's competition here
ANF vs CATO Comparison April 2026
ANF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANF stands at 3.9B. In comparison, CATO has a market cap of 51M. Regarding current trading prices, ANF is priced at $86.59, while CATO trades at $2.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas CATO's P/E ratio is -9.18. In terms of profitability, ANF's ROE is +0.39%, compared to CATO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ANF is less volatile compared to CATO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANF.Check CATO's competition here
ANF vs DXLG Comparison April 2026
ANF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANF stands at 3.9B. In comparison, DXLG has a market cap of 35.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ANF is priced at $86.59, while DXLG trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas DXLG's P/E ratio is -0.98. In terms of profitability, ANF's ROE is +0.39%, compared to DXLG's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ANF is less volatile compared to DXLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANF.Check DXLG's competition here
ANF vs DBGIW Comparison April 2026
ANF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANF stands at 3.9B. In comparison, DBGIW has a market cap of 30.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ANF is priced at $86.59, while DBGIW trades at $16.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas DBGIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ANF's ROE is +0.39%, compared to DBGIW's ROE of -2.97%. Regarding short-term risk, ANF is less volatile compared to DBGIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANF.Check DBGIW's competition here
ANF vs LVLU Comparison April 2026
ANF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANF stands at 3.9B. In comparison, LVLU has a market cap of 30.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ANF is priced at $86.59, while LVLU trades at $10.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas LVLU's P/E ratio is -2.16. In terms of profitability, ANF's ROE is +0.39%, compared to LVLU's ROE of -3.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ANF is less volatile compared to LVLU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANF.Check LVLU's competition here
ANF vs RENT Comparison April 2026
ANF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANF stands at 3.9B. In comparison, RENT has a market cap of 20.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ANF is priced at $86.59, while RENT trades at $4.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas RENT's P/E ratio is 2.54. In terms of profitability, ANF's ROE is +0.39%, compared to RENT's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ANF is less volatile compared to RENT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANF.Check RENT's competition here
ANF vs DBGI Comparison April 2026
ANF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANF stands at 3.9B. In comparison, DBGI has a market cap of 11.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ANF is priced at $86.59, while DBGI trades at $1.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas DBGI's P/E ratio is -0.63. In terms of profitability, ANF's ROE is +0.39%, compared to DBGI's ROE of -2.97%. Regarding short-term risk, ANF is less volatile compared to DBGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANF.Check DBGI's competition here
ANF vs EXPR Comparison April 2026
ANF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANF stands at 3.9B. In comparison, EXPR has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ANF is priced at $86.59, while EXPR trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas EXPR's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, ANF's ROE is +0.39%, compared to EXPR's ROE of +1.90%. Regarding short-term risk, ANF is less volatile compared to EXPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANF.Check EXPR's competition here
ANF vs JEM Comparison April 2026
ANF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANF stands at 3.9B. In comparison, JEM has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ANF is priced at $86.59, while JEM trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas JEM's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, ANF's ROE is +0.39%, compared to JEM's ROE of +1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ANF is less volatile compared to JEM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANF.Check JEM's competition here
ANF vs COX Comparison April 2026
ANF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANF stands at 3.9B. In comparison, COX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ANF is priced at $86.59, while COX trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas COX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ANF's ROE is +0.39%, compared to COX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ANF is less volatile compared to COX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANF.Check COX's competition here
ANF vs TSA Comparison April 2026
ANF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANF stands at 3.9B. In comparison, TSA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ANF is priced at $86.59, while TSA trades at $20.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas TSA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ANF's ROE is +0.39%, compared to TSA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ANF is more volatile compared to TSA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANF.Check TSA's competition here
ANF vs FINL Comparison April 2026
ANF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANF stands at 3.9B. In comparison, FINL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ANF is priced at $86.59, while FINL trades at $13.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas FINL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ANF's ROE is +0.39%, compared to FINL's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ANF is more volatile compared to FINL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANF.Check FINL's competition here
ANF vs CLE Comparison April 2026
ANF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANF stands at 3.9B. In comparison, CLE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ANF is priced at $86.59, while CLE trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas CLE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ANF's ROE is +0.39%, compared to CLE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ANF is more volatile compared to CLE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANF.Check CLE's competition here
ANF vs LDG Comparison April 2026
ANF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ANF stands at 3.9B. In comparison, LDG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ANF is priced at $86.59, while LDG trades at $20,900.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ANF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.28, whereas LDG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ANF's ROE is +0.39%, compared to LDG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ANF is less volatile compared to LDG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ANF.Check LDG's competition here