Digital Brands Group, Inc.
Digital Brands Group, Inc. (DBGIW) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (DBGIW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Apparel - Retail Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DBGIW | $16.00 | +26.88% | 30.5M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| TJX | $157.03 | -0.83% | 174.4B | 32.24 | $4.87 | +1.08% |
| ROST | $226.37 | -0.24% | 73.2B | 34.25 | $6.61 | +0.73% |
| BURL | $331.77 | +0.65% | 20.9B | 34.94 | $9.50 | N/A |
| LULU | $143.80 | +1.51% | 16.9B | 10.84 | $13.26 | N/A |
| ONON | $36.25 | +0.08% | 12B | 47.69 | $0.76 | N/A |
| GAP | $24.99 | -0.85% | 9.3B | 11.72 | $2.13 | +2.69% |
| GPS | $24.55 | +4.38% | 9.2B | 13.64 | $1.80 | +2.44% |
| URBN | $73.64 | -0.28% | 6.6B | 14.55 | $5.06 | N/A |
| BOOT | $168.69 | +3.37% | 5.1B | 23.66 | $7.13 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
DBGIW vs TJX Comparison April 2026
DBGIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBGIW stands at 30.5M. In comparison, TJX has a market cap of 174.4B. Regarding current trading prices, DBGIW is priced at $16.00, while TJX trades at $157.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBGIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TJX's P/E ratio is 32.24. In terms of profitability, DBGIW's ROE is -2.97%, compared to TJX's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, DBGIW is more volatile compared to TJX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBGIW.Check TJX's competition here
DBGIW vs ROST Comparison April 2026
DBGIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBGIW stands at 30.5M. In comparison, ROST has a market cap of 73.2B. Regarding current trading prices, DBGIW is priced at $16.00, while ROST trades at $226.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBGIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ROST's P/E ratio is 34.25. In terms of profitability, DBGIW's ROE is -2.97%, compared to ROST's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, DBGIW is more volatile compared to ROST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBGIW.Check ROST's competition here
DBGIW vs BURL Comparison April 2026
DBGIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBGIW stands at 30.5M. In comparison, BURL has a market cap of 20.9B. Regarding current trading prices, DBGIW is priced at $16.00, while BURL trades at $331.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBGIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BURL's P/E ratio is 34.94. In terms of profitability, DBGIW's ROE is -2.97%, compared to BURL's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, DBGIW is more volatile compared to BURL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBGIW.Check BURL's competition here
DBGIW vs LULU Comparison April 2026
DBGIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBGIW stands at 30.5M. In comparison, LULU has a market cap of 16.9B. Regarding current trading prices, DBGIW is priced at $16.00, while LULU trades at $143.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBGIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LULU's P/E ratio is 10.84. In terms of profitability, DBGIW's ROE is -2.97%, compared to LULU's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, DBGIW is more volatile compared to LULU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBGIW.Check LULU's competition here
DBGIW vs ONON Comparison April 2026
DBGIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBGIW stands at 30.5M. In comparison, ONON has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, DBGIW is priced at $16.00, while ONON trades at $36.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBGIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ONON's P/E ratio is 47.69. In terms of profitability, DBGIW's ROE is -2.97%, compared to ONON's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, DBGIW is more volatile compared to ONON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBGIW.Check ONON's competition here
DBGIW vs GAP Comparison April 2026
DBGIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBGIW stands at 30.5M. In comparison, GAP has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, DBGIW is priced at $16.00, while GAP trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBGIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GAP's P/E ratio is 11.72. In terms of profitability, DBGIW's ROE is -2.97%, compared to GAP's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, DBGIW is more volatile compared to GAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBGIW.Check GAP's competition here
DBGIW vs GPS Comparison April 2026
DBGIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBGIW stands at 30.5M. In comparison, GPS has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, DBGIW is priced at $16.00, while GPS trades at $24.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBGIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GPS's P/E ratio is 13.64. In terms of profitability, DBGIW's ROE is -2.97%, compared to GPS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, DBGIW is more volatile compared to GPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBGIW.Check GPS's competition here
DBGIW vs URBN Comparison April 2026
DBGIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBGIW stands at 30.5M. In comparison, URBN has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, DBGIW is priced at $16.00, while URBN trades at $73.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBGIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas URBN's P/E ratio is 14.55. In terms of profitability, DBGIW's ROE is -2.97%, compared to URBN's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, DBGIW is more volatile compared to URBN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBGIW.Check URBN's competition here
DBGIW vs BOOT Comparison April 2026
DBGIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBGIW stands at 30.5M. In comparison, BOOT has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, DBGIW is priced at $16.00, while BOOT trades at $168.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBGIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BOOT's P/E ratio is 23.66. In terms of profitability, DBGIW's ROE is -2.97%, compared to BOOT's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, DBGIW is more volatile compared to BOOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBGIW.Check BOOT's competition here
DBGIW vs VSCO Comparison April 2026
DBGIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBGIW stands at 30.5M. In comparison, VSCO has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, DBGIW is priced at $16.00, while VSCO trades at $52.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBGIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VSCO's P/E ratio is 27.37. In terms of profitability, DBGIW's ROE is -2.97%, compared to VSCO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, DBGIW is more volatile compared to VSCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBGIW.Check VSCO's competition here
DBGIW vs ANF Comparison April 2026
DBGIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBGIW stands at 30.5M. In comparison, ANF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, DBGIW is priced at $16.00, while ANF trades at $87.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBGIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ANF's P/E ratio is 8.32. In terms of profitability, DBGIW's ROE is -2.97%, compared to ANF's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, DBGIW is more volatile compared to ANF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBGIW.Check ANF's competition here
DBGIW vs AEO Comparison April 2026
DBGIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBGIW stands at 30.5M. In comparison, AEO has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, DBGIW is priced at $16.00, while AEO trades at $17.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBGIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AEO's P/E ratio is 16.42. In terms of profitability, DBGIW's ROE is -2.97%, compared to AEO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, DBGIW is more volatile compared to AEO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBGIW.Check AEO's competition here
DBGIW vs BKE Comparison April 2026
DBGIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBGIW stands at 30.5M. In comparison, BKE has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, DBGIW is priced at $16.00, while BKE trades at $56.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBGIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BKE's P/E ratio is 13.57. In terms of profitability, DBGIW's ROE is -2.97%, compared to BKE's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, DBGIW is more volatile compared to BKE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBGIW.Check BKE's competition here
DBGIW vs FL Comparison April 2026
DBGIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBGIW stands at 30.5M. In comparison, FL has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, DBGIW is priced at $16.00, while FL trades at $24.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBGIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FL's P/E ratio is -6.05. In terms of profitability, DBGIW's ROE is -2.97%, compared to FL's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, DBGIW is more volatile compared to FL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBGIW.Check FL's competition here
DBGIW vs CRI Comparison April 2026
DBGIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBGIW stands at 30.5M. In comparison, CRI has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, DBGIW is priced at $16.00, while CRI trades at $37.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBGIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRI's P/E ratio is 14.72. In terms of profitability, DBGIW's ROE is -2.97%, compared to CRI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, DBGIW is more volatile compared to CRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBGIW.Check CRI's competition here
DBGIW vs HIBB Comparison April 2026
DBGIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBGIW stands at 30.5M. In comparison, HIBB has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, DBGIW is priced at $16.00, while HIBB trades at $87.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBGIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HIBB's P/E ratio is 10.80. In terms of profitability, DBGIW's ROE is -2.97%, compared to HIBB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, DBGIW is more volatile compared to HIBB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBGIW.Check HIBB's competition here
DBGIW vs CHS Comparison April 2026
DBGIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBGIW stands at 30.5M. In comparison, CHS has a market cap of 937M. Regarding current trading prices, DBGIW is priced at $16.00, while CHS trades at $7.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBGIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHS's P/E ratio is 8.34. In terms of profitability, DBGIW's ROE is -2.97%, compared to CHS's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, DBGIW is more volatile compared to CHS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBGIW.Check CHS's competition here
DBGIW vs GES Comparison April 2026
DBGIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBGIW stands at 30.5M. In comparison, GES has a market cap of 876.7M. Regarding current trading prices, DBGIW is priced at $16.00, while GES trades at $16.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBGIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GES's P/E ratio is 14.49. In terms of profitability, DBGIW's ROE is -2.97%, compared to GES's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, DBGIW is more volatile compared to GES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBGIW.Check GES's competition here
DBGIW vs SFIX Comparison April 2026
DBGIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBGIW stands at 30.5M. In comparison, SFIX has a market cap of 525.6M. Regarding current trading prices, DBGIW is priced at $16.00, while SFIX trades at $3.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBGIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SFIX's P/E ratio is -20.26. In terms of profitability, DBGIW's ROE is -2.97%, compared to SFIX's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, DBGIW is more volatile compared to SFIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBGIW.Check SFIX's competition here
DBGIW vs SCVL Comparison April 2026
DBGIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBGIW stands at 30.5M. In comparison, SCVL has a market cap of 513.7M. Regarding current trading prices, DBGIW is priced at $16.00, while SCVL trades at $18.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBGIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SCVL's P/E ratio is 9.84. In terms of profitability, DBGIW's ROE is -2.97%, compared to SCVL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, DBGIW is more volatile compared to SCVL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBGIW.Check SCVL's competition here
DBGIW vs CTRN Comparison April 2026
DBGIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBGIW stands at 30.5M. In comparison, CTRN has a market cap of 422.8M. Regarding current trading prices, DBGIW is priced at $16.00, while CTRN trades at $50.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBGIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTRN's P/E ratio is 80.41. In terms of profitability, DBGIW's ROE is -2.97%, compared to CTRN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, DBGIW is more volatile compared to CTRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBGIW.Check CTRN's competition here
DBGIW vs ZUMZ Comparison April 2026
DBGIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBGIW stands at 30.5M. In comparison, ZUMZ has a market cap of 416.8M. Regarding current trading prices, DBGIW is priced at $16.00, while ZUMZ trades at $24.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBGIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZUMZ's P/E ratio is 31.49. In terms of profitability, DBGIW's ROE is -2.97%, compared to ZUMZ's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, DBGIW is more volatile compared to ZUMZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBGIW.Check ZUMZ's competition here
DBGIW vs DBI Comparison April 2026
DBGIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBGIW stands at 30.5M. In comparison, DBI has a market cap of 410.7M. Regarding current trading prices, DBGIW is priced at $16.00, while DBI trades at $8.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBGIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DBI's P/E ratio is -47.65. In terms of profitability, DBGIW's ROE is -2.97%, compared to DBI's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, DBGIW is more volatile compared to DBI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBGIW.Check DBI's competition here
DBGIW vs GCO Comparison April 2026
DBGIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBGIW stands at 30.5M. In comparison, GCO has a market cap of 381.9M. Regarding current trading prices, DBGIW is priced at $16.00, while GCO trades at $35.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBGIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GCO's P/E ratio is 28.14. In terms of profitability, DBGIW's ROE is -2.97%, compared to GCO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, DBGIW is more volatile compared to GCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBGIW.Check GCO's competition here
DBGIW vs CURV Comparison April 2026
DBGIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBGIW stands at 30.5M. In comparison, CURV has a market cap of 181.3M. Regarding current trading prices, DBGIW is priced at $16.00, while CURV trades at $1.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBGIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CURV's P/E ratio is -26.07. In terms of profitability, DBGIW's ROE is -2.97%, compared to CURV's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, DBGIW is more volatile compared to CURV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBGIW.Check CURV's competition here
DBGIW vs JILL Comparison April 2026
DBGIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBGIW stands at 30.5M. In comparison, JILL has a market cap of 149.2M. Regarding current trading prices, DBGIW is priced at $16.00, while JILL trades at $13.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBGIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JILL's P/E ratio is 7.25. In terms of profitability, DBGIW's ROE is -2.97%, compared to JILL's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, DBGIW is more volatile compared to JILL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBGIW.Check JILL's competition here
DBGIW vs DLTH Comparison April 2026
DBGIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBGIW stands at 30.5M. In comparison, DLTH has a market cap of 132.3M. Regarding current trading prices, DBGIW is priced at $16.00, while DLTH trades at $3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBGIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DLTH's P/E ratio is -7.66. In terms of profitability, DBGIW's ROE is -2.97%, compared to DLTH's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, DBGIW is more volatile compared to DLTH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBGIW.Check DLTH's competition here
DBGIW vs TLYS Comparison April 2026
DBGIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBGIW stands at 30.5M. In comparison, TLYS has a market cap of 121M. Regarding current trading prices, DBGIW is priced at $16.00, while TLYS trades at $3.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBGIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TLYS's P/E ratio is -6.93. In terms of profitability, DBGIW's ROE is -2.97%, compared to TLYS's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, DBGIW is more volatile compared to TLYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBGIW.Check TLYS's competition here
DBGIW vs PLCE Comparison April 2026
DBGIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBGIW stands at 30.5M. In comparison, PLCE has a market cap of 74.9M. Regarding current trading prices, DBGIW is priced at $16.00, while PLCE trades at $3.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBGIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PLCE's P/E ratio is -0.84. In terms of profitability, DBGIW's ROE is -2.97%, compared to PLCE's ROE of +5.33%. Regarding short-term risk, DBGIW is more volatile compared to PLCE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBGIW.Check PLCE's competition here
DBGIW vs CATO Comparison April 2026
DBGIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBGIW stands at 30.5M. In comparison, CATO has a market cap of 52M. Regarding current trading prices, DBGIW is priced at $16.00, while CATO trades at $2.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBGIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CATO's P/E ratio is -9.32. In terms of profitability, DBGIW's ROE is -2.97%, compared to CATO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, DBGIW is more volatile compared to CATO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBGIW.Check CATO's competition here
DBGIW vs DXLG Comparison April 2026
DBGIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBGIW stands at 30.5M. In comparison, DXLG has a market cap of 38M. Regarding current trading prices, DBGIW is priced at $16.00, while DXLG trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBGIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DXLG's P/E ratio is -1.05. In terms of profitability, DBGIW's ROE is -2.97%, compared to DXLG's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, DBGIW is more volatile compared to DXLG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBGIW.Check DXLG's competition here
DBGIW vs LVLU Comparison April 2026
DBGIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBGIW stands at 30.5M. In comparison, LVLU has a market cap of 27.1M. Regarding current trading prices, DBGIW is priced at $16.00, while LVLU trades at $9.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBGIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LVLU's P/E ratio is -1.94. In terms of profitability, DBGIW's ROE is -2.97%, compared to LVLU's ROE of -3.27%. Regarding short-term risk, DBGIW is more volatile compared to LVLU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBGIW.Check LVLU's competition here
DBGIW vs RENT Comparison April 2026
DBGIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBGIW stands at 30.5M. In comparison, RENT has a market cap of 21.4M. Regarding current trading prices, DBGIW is priced at $16.00, while RENT trades at $4.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBGIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RENT's P/E ratio is 2.63. In terms of profitability, DBGIW's ROE is -2.97%, compared to RENT's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, DBGIW is more volatile compared to RENT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBGIW.Check RENT's competition here
DBGIW vs DBGI Comparison April 2026
DBGIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBGIW stands at 30.5M. In comparison, DBGI has a market cap of 11.7M. Regarding current trading prices, DBGIW is priced at $16.00, while DBGI trades at $1.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBGIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DBGI's P/E ratio is -0.66. In terms of profitability, DBGIW's ROE is -2.97%, compared to DBGI's ROE of -2.97%. Regarding short-term risk, DBGIW is more volatile compared to DBGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBGIW.Check DBGI's competition here
DBGIW vs EXPR Comparison April 2026
DBGIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBGIW stands at 30.5M. In comparison, EXPR has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, DBGIW is priced at $16.00, while EXPR trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBGIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXPR's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, DBGIW's ROE is -2.97%, compared to EXPR's ROE of +1.90%. Regarding short-term risk, DBGIW is less volatile compared to EXPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBGIW.Check EXPR's competition here
DBGIW vs JEM Comparison April 2026
DBGIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBGIW stands at 30.5M. In comparison, JEM has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, DBGIW is priced at $16.00, while JEM trades at $1.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBGIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JEM's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, DBGIW's ROE is -2.97%, compared to JEM's ROE of +1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, DBGIW is more volatile compared to JEM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBGIW.Check JEM's competition here
DBGIW vs COX Comparison April 2026
DBGIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBGIW stands at 30.5M. In comparison, COX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, DBGIW is priced at $16.00, while COX trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBGIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas COX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DBGIW's ROE is -2.97%, compared to COX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DBGIW is more volatile compared to COX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBGIW.Check COX's competition here
DBGIW vs LDG Comparison April 2026
DBGIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBGIW stands at 30.5M. In comparison, LDG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, DBGIW is priced at $16.00, while LDG trades at $20,900.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBGIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LDG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DBGIW's ROE is -2.97%, compared to LDG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DBGIW is more volatile compared to LDG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBGIW.Check LDG's competition here
DBGIW vs FINL Comparison April 2026
DBGIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBGIW stands at 30.5M. In comparison, FINL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, DBGIW is priced at $16.00, while FINL trades at $13.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBGIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FINL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DBGIW's ROE is -2.97%, compared to FINL's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, DBGIW is more volatile compared to FINL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBGIW.Check FINL's competition here
DBGIW vs CLE Comparison April 2026
DBGIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBGIW stands at 30.5M. In comparison, CLE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, DBGIW is priced at $16.00, while CLE trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBGIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DBGIW's ROE is -2.97%, compared to CLE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DBGIW is more volatile compared to CLE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBGIW.Check CLE's competition here
DBGIW vs TSA Comparison April 2026
DBGIW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DBGIW stands at 30.5M. In comparison, TSA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, DBGIW is priced at $16.00, while TSA trades at $20.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DBGIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TSA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DBGIW's ROE is -2.97%, compared to TSA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DBGIW is more volatile compared to TSA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DBGIW.Check TSA's competition here